Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Mystery White Plane
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > 9/11: Theories, etc.
Snuffysmith
EXCLUSIVE VID OF BUSH ENTERING UNDERGROUND COMMAND CENTER SEPT 11 + E-4B (MYSTERY WHITE PLANE) ON THE GROUND + MUCH MORE

The mystery white plane.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgF9Fd4UyMY

Air Force One landed at Offutt shortly before 3:00 p.m. [Washington Post, 9/11/01] At 3:06, Bush passed through security to the US Strategic Command Underground Command Center [Salon, 9/11/01, CBS, 9/11/02] and was taken into an underground bunker designed to withstand a nuclear blast. [Telegraph, 12/16/01]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYGMXlrv-PQ

As a side note, Warren Buffett, one of the richest people in the world, was hosting an unpublicized charity benefit inside the high security Offutt military base at 8:00 a.m. With him were business leaders and several executives from the World Trade Center, including Anne Tatlock of Fiduciary Trust Co. International, who likely would have died had it not been for the meeting. [San Francisco Business Times, 2/1/02] They watched a lot of the television coverage that morning, but it's unknown if any of these people were still at Offutt by the time Bush arrived in the afternoon.

http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?ar...ninterestingday

Now if Warren Buffett hosting a "charity event" at the U.S. Strategic Commander headquarters on 9/11 in which one of the invited guests was a CEO who's offices were where the 2nd hijacked plane crashed into at the WTC and that the head of the 9/11 investigation used to be the director of her company doesn't raise an eyebrow or two, then maybe the following little tidbits will.

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has a subsidiary company called NetJets.

► Subsidiary Companies: NetJets®

(Formerly Executive Jet)

NETJETS INC AND BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY
In 1995, world-renowned financier Warren Buffett purchased his first fractional share in the NetJets® program. Three-and-a-half years later, Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway purchased NetJets Inc.


"As a NetJets fractional aircraft Owner, I had Three-and-a-half years to examine the service of NetJets before Berkshire Hathaway purchased NetJets Inc. We knew we were purchasing the premier provider of aviation solutions in the world. And you can quote me to the world on that."
- WARREN BUFFETT, Chairman and CEO Berkshire Hathaway Inc.


Business Partners - The Boeing Company, FlightSafety International, Inc., Raytheon Company

Oddly enough, a NetJets executive company jet was "tracking" Flight 93 when it crashed in an open field in Shanksville, PA.

► "Additional recordings would be played from the cockpit of an executive jet that tracked Flight 93 on Sept. 11...
An official for NetJets, a company that sells shares in private business aircraft, confirmed that the plane tracking Flight 93 belonged to the company.
The official, who asked not to be identified by name, said the company was asked not to comment on the Sept. 11 flight but would not say who made the request." -Holland Sentinel/AP (8/09/02)


Now why was an executive jet owned by one of Warren Buffett's companies "tracking" Flight 93 instead of a military jet try to intercept it?

More interesting is that fact that Flight 93 was rumored to have been shot down (in which the U.S. Government vehemently denies) and that a number of witnesses claimed to have seen a "mysterious small white jet" in the same area that Flight 93 was before it crashed in which the FBI claimed there was no other plane in the area and then changed it's story and said there was one, but it was just "taking pictures" of the crash.

Susan Mcelwain, 51 - "It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50ft above my mini-van," she recalled.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gliHOhXYFQ

"There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look.

"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around."

"Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000ft up."
"But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40ft above my head. They did not want my story - nobody here did."
"She said her husband had called her that morning and said 'I can't talk, but we've just shot a plane down,' " Susan said. "I presumed they meant Flight 93." -Daily Mirror (9/13/02)
-----


Is this the white jet she saw?

http://killtown.911review.org/buffett.html
See also;
http://www.unknownnews.net/cdd061002.html


Raytheon Company Why Were Raytheon Employees on Every 9/11 Flight that Officially Hit a Building?

Fascinating findings.

Flight 11:
Peter Gay was Raytheon's Vice President of Operations for Electronic Systems and had been on special assignment to a company office in El Segundo, Calif.


This division is one of two divisions making the Global Hawk.

Kenneth Waldie was a senior quality control engineer for Raytheon's electronic systems.

David Kovalcin was a senior mechanical engineer for Raytheon's electronic systems.

Flight 175:
Herbert Homer was a corporate executive working with the Department of Defense.


And for some very strange reasons he was listed for several days as having died in the while working in the Pentagon.

Flight 77:
Stanley Hall was director of program management for Raytheon Electronics Warfare. One Raytheon colleague calls him "our dean of electronic warfare."


Charles S. Falkenberg: He worked on "EOS Webster" a mapping system which provides Landsat Images, which are part of the mapping system for the Global Hawk technology.

Raytheon is working on Global Hawk piloltless aircraft program.

Now, if this is not coincidental enough for you:

What are the odds that Raytheon also had one office in the WTC2?

http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2005/...s-on-every.html
------------


As you can see, the web becomes more intricate as further information comes to light.
Why was Warren having a 'party' at 8 in the morning, with high ranking CEO's who should have been working in the WTC on that day???


http://www.unknownnews.net/cdd061002.html


cutecat
Living in Omaha I can tell you White House one the Presidents plane landed at Offutt Air Base. We saw it come in and his being here was covered on our local news.
Rumor was he was out of control and needed to contact Chaney and military and time to calm down and get it together.

Now since Offutt is known for looking glass air planes and maneuvers A Military Doomsday Plane over White House would make sense.
I Had heard that Chaney had ordered planes shot down but never confirmed if one was. So if the conspirator's are saying this plane shot down the plane that crashed into the Pentagon I would not be surprised that no one would acknowledge. If it was a dooms day white house plane no one would talk about it.
I would suspect that film was the reason that the White House said they were targeted.

Also remember how fast every plane in the sky were landed. I rmember because my sister was on a plane from Omaha to Texas. I also remember the aviation reports showing how fast planes were landing and how fast the sky became empty.
Magmak1
QUOTE(cutecat @ Dec 13 2008, 05:54 PM) *
... remember how fast every plane in the sky were landed.



Isn't it interesting that the very same FAA/airspace command network

that was so bumblingly incompetent from 8:45 to 10:00 AM that morning that they looked like Keystone cops, unable to clearly and correctly identify four key aircraft or vector combat air patrol aircraft onto them
suddenly turned into such an efficient and adept crew that they could bring the totality of all air traffic in the US to a safe landing -- for the very first time in history -- later that very same morning?






Isn't it interesting that a former member of the Board of Directors from the company that had remote fly-by-wire technology and PROmis software -- and which now may be given a no-bid contract to build two new high-altitude spy satellites under a no-bid contract -- sat (having been brought there by the Secret Service) in the White House command bunker with her husband the war games maestro at the same time as the National Reconaissance Office was evacuated and three aircraft were guided into precise locations in three separate impacts?

"The flight paths of the September 11, 2001 attack aircraft bear characteristics common to the capabilities provided by precision automated flight control systems and related technology that emerged just prior to these attacks. The clandestine use of precise augmented GPS guided auto-pilot aircraft systems in order to perform the said aircraft attacks is hypothesized."

"Because the Flight Data Recorders (FDRs) for American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines flight 175 were not recovered, details regarding the operation of each aircraft are not known. The FDRs for American Airlines flight 77 and United Airlines flight 93 were recovered and indicate pilot control of each aircraft. However, the FDR readout file for American Airlines flight 77 was completed four hours and fifteen minutes before the said FDR was recovered, suggesting false or altered FDR information.[43] And the FDRs for American Airlines flight 77 and United Airlines flight 93 are virtually the only ones during the previous 20 years of major National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) U.S. aviation mishap investigations, for which unique inventory control serial numbers were not published.[44] Such serial numbers are required to facilitate FDR data readouts.[45] In fact the NTSB possesses no records pertaining to the positive identification of the FDRs for American Airlines flight 77 and United Airlines flight 93.[46]

Isn't that interesting..


Isn’t it interesting that, at about 10:23 a.m on 9/11/01 “Counterterrorism “tsar” Richard Clarke hears these reports [of other terrorism attacks in D.C.] at this time and asks Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage in the State Department to see if the building he’s in has been hit. Armitage goes outside the building, finds out there’s no bomb, and calls his colleagues to inform them that the reports are false.”

There was no one else at the State Department who could go outside and see?
No security systems, camera coverage, or anything else?

Isn’t it interesting that one of the most highly decorated “spooks” in the American toolkit, a former covert operative and Navy Seal and a man with deep connections to Pakistani intelligence (as well as a role in the Iran-Contra affair), is detailed to go outside and see if a car bomb detonated?

Isn’t it interesting that the man who was Deputy Secretary of State while Colin Powell was out of the country and therefore “out of the [OODA] loop” and thus Acting Secretary of State, was asked by the chief crisis manager on 9/11 to go outdoors and see if a car bomb had gone off outside the State Department?

This is the man who held seats in many prominent corporate boardrooms, including Raytheon and Mantech International. His company's clients have included multimillion-dollar defense contractors such as Boeing, Science Application International Corporation, and Halliburton subsidiary Brown & Root, as well as financial powerhouses Goldman Sachs and Chase Manhattan. and has personally invested millions in companies such as Pfizer, Chase Manhattan and American International Group.

As noted above… as well as in Aidan Monaghan’s recently-released hypothesis, Raytheon was involved in 9/11.

According to Managhan, “Raytheon's director of satellite navigation systems even reported that rescue personnel utilized the newly activated WAAS signal, in order to precisely survey the Ground Zero site following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.[7] WAAS: Back in Step, Avionics Magazine, February 1, 2002 http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/categories...cial/12571.html

Raytheon also produces the FIRSTplus Air Traffic Control Simulator. Raytheon also produces and runs the ABACUS (Advanced BAttlefield CompUter Simulation). More specifically, in communications, Raytheon’s Universal Control System (UCS) is "an unmanned aerial system (UAS) "cockpit" that improves operator awareness and efficiency, while providing the ability to control multiple unmanned aircraft".... The company also makes several software radio and digital communication systems for military applications such as Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC), is participating in Navy-Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI), ECHELON and the Joint Tactical Terminal (JTT) programs.

##############


Google search for "Richard Armitage on 9/11"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=R...mp;aq=f&oq=


History Commons search (all projects) for "Richard Armitage"
http://www.historycommons.org/searchResult...n&search=Go


jeffmoskin
QUOTE(Magmak1 @ Apr 8 2009, 11:11 PM) *
...that was so bumblingly incompetent from 8:45 to 10:00 AM that morning that they looked like Keystone cops, unable to clearly and correctly identify four key aircraft or vector combat air patrol aircraft onto them...

Air Traffic Control was designed to direct the "blips" on the radar screens. With the transponders turned OFF on the 4 hijacked planes, the FAA's job became a lot more difficult.

Then there is the unproven allegation from Mike Ruppert that Cheney had NORAD (he appointed himself Commander as of May) inject bogus "targets" onto the FAA screens, forcing them to choose which blip was the actual plane.

The REAL question is how our Air Force, which depends on no outside help and for which we have spent 50 years worth of DOD money, could not spot them.

Or why they didn't even try.
Magmak1
“Important new evidence corroborates Gaffney's conclusion, and raises further questions about the role played by the E-4B planes on 9/11. This evidence appears in the 2003 book Black Ice: The Invisible Threat of Cyber-Terrorism, written by Dan Verton, a former intelligence officer in the U.S. Marine Corps and former senior writer for Computerworld magazine, who has written extensively on national security, the intelligence community, and national defense topics. Verton reported that, the morning of September 11, an E-4B was launched from "an airfield outside of the nation's capital." (He did not, however, state which specific base.) This plane was carrying "civilian and military officials," and was going "to conduct a previously scheduled Defense Department exercise." This exercise would involve "the use and testing of the aircraft's various advanced technology and communications equipment."

http://www.911blogger.com/node/10441 Mon, 08/06/2007

****************

Black Ice: The Invisible Threat of Cyber-Terrorism
Chapter Seven: 9/11: The Cyber-terrorist Attack

http://books.mcgraw-hill.com/downloads/pro...227877_ch07.pdf


"One of the first things that all U.S. military officers are taught is to accept the inevitability of the “fog of war,” a phrase that refers to the uncertainty and confusion that often arises in the heat of battle as a result of a commander lacking adequate information about the enemy and terrain, or receiving faulty intelligence. More importantly, however, is the emphasis that U.S. military officer training courses place on being able to operate effectively and decisively under such circumstances. And on September 11, 2001, that training would be put to the test in America’s own backyard.

On the fifth floor Strategic Information and Operations Center at the FBI’s headquarters facility in Washington, D.C., Ron Dick, former director of the FBI’s National Infrastructure Protection Center and a 24-year veteran of the FBI, began the process of setting up a 24-hour Cyber-Crisis Action Team (C-CAT) that would be responsible for not only helping Brenton Greene’s physical recovery effort in New York but also monitoring the Internet infrastructure for signs of a follow-on cyber-attack that might target additional sectors of the economy. “There were a lot of unknowns,” recalled Dick.

snip

While Greene was rushing back to the NCS operations center to get a better understanding of what had happened in New York, civilian and military officials were boarding a militarized version of a Boeing 747, known as the E-4B National Airborne Operations Center (NAOC), at an airfield outside of the nation’s capital. They were preparing to conduct a previously scheduled Defense Department exercise.

There are four E-4Bs, code-named “Night Watch,” in the U.S. military arsenal. They exist to provide the president, vice president, and Joint Chiefs of Staff with an airborne command center that can be used to execute war plans and coordinate other emergency government operations in the event of a national emergency or destruction of ground command and control centers. As a result, they are often referred to unofficially as “the doomsday planes.” One E-4B remains on alert at all times.

As the crew of the E-4B was preparing to begin the regularly scheduled training exercise, including the use and testing of the aircraft’s various advanced technology and communications equipment, the FAA was ordering all New York City area airports to cease flight operations. Minutes later, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey ordered all bridges and tunnels in the new York area closed. The fog of war was thick and officials were left wondering if other airplanes were about to come careening out of the haze like jet-powered artillery shells.

President George W. Bush, who had been speaking to second graders at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida, was notified immediately of the unfolding crisis. At 9:30, Bush informed his audience and the nation that America had become a victim of “an apparent terrorist attack.” Ten minutes later, the FAA ordered a historic nationwide grounding of all air traffic. It was clear to many officials, however, that the crisis was far from over. And that fact was driven home at 9:43, when American Airlines Flight 77 plowed through the thick concrete walls of the Pentagon. There were thousands of airplanes still in the air and heading toward airports all over the country. And one of them, a 747 code-named “Night Watch,” had only just taken off and was immediately ordered to cease the military exercise it was conducting and prepare to become the actual national airborne operations center. America was under attack.

snip

"As the president was being whisked off to a secure command and control facility at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska, the White House began an evacuation of all nonessential personnel. Specific concerns had been relayed by the intelligence community about the potential targeting of the White House and the Capitol building. It was an apparent effort to decapitate the government and sow mass confusion.

Clarke, acting on direct orders from the president and vice president, then initiated the emergency continuity of the government plan, which called for all federal departments to relocate to alternate sites and for the Speaker of the House of Representatives to be moved to a secure location outside of Washington. Although the secretary of defense remained at the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense, was moved to an alternate military command and control center. Shortly thereafter, all ports and border crossings were ordered closed, and all available military fighter aircraft were launched.

For Clarke, most of the morning was spent ensuring that all of the various orders relating to the emergency action plan were being carried out. Members of Clarke’s staff would remain in close contact with the FBI’s National Infrastructure Protection Center. Meanwhile, as the public watched the horrible human tragedy unfold live on television, Clarke, Dick, and their respective staffs were forced to deal with another possibility: that the morning’s attacks could be one phase of a multi-pronged assault that could include attacks against the digital infrastructure of the U.S. economy. If that was the case, then they were staring at the one scenario that had often kept them awake at night.

Across town at the NIPC, Dick summoned his key advisors into an emergency meeting to analyze all available cyber-intelligence. Among those Dick relied on for expert advice were Bob Gerber, a career CIA officer who had been detailed to the NIPC to serve as the agency’s chief of analysis and warning; Navy rear admiral James Plehal, who served as Dick’s deputy and was a key link to the Defense Department establishment; and Les Wiser, the FBI agent responsible for tracking down CIA spy Aldrich Ames. A major cyber-attack now would prove absolutely devastating to the rescue and recovery effort and would almost certainly amplify the sense of fear and uncertainty far away from the epicenter of the main attack in New York. Such an assault had to be stopped at all costs.

But with the crash of hijacked American Airlines Flight 93 in Pennsylvania, the fog of war had settled firmly over official Washington. Despite the billions of dollars invested every year in advanced information technology designed to provide key government and military decision-makers with what is known in military parlance as “situation awareness,” the fog of September 11 proved too thick to see through. America’s national security community was thrown off-balance and had lost (in fact, may never have had) the initiative. What should have been an offensive war of maneuver had quickly turned into a reactive war fought from trenches and hardened bunkers.

September 11 was far from over when a small cadre of highly respected national security experts began warning of the potential for the physical attacks to be followed by cyber-attacks.

Marv Langston, the former deputy CIO at the Defense Department, characterized the events during an interview with Computerworld magazine as an act of war and said the country needed to be on alert for what he described as an “electronic Pearl Harbor.” Likewise, retired Air Force Lt. General Al Edmonds, who at one time headed the Defense Information Systems Agency, said he feared a cyber-attack could be next and added that such an event would be “absolutely paralyzing.”

Meanwhile, Atlanta-based Internet Security Systems, Inc. (ISS), which operates the IT industry’s Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC), placed its operations center on what it called AlertCon 3 (the highest is AlertCon 4), “in order to focus IT security efforts on the potential for (and defense against) an Internet component to these attacks.” The IT-ISAC was one of several ISACs established in cooperation with the FBI and the NIPC to share information between the government and the private sector about cyber-threats.

In a threat assessment issued to the private sector members of the ISAC, ISS stated, “This is a time to partner all security assets on what is most important to your enterprise. While physical security concerns are paramount, it is essential to keep some eyes on the networks focused on malicious activity. We can expect a significant increase in disaster-recovery activity—plans being activated, dusted off, etc. No doubt the [disaster recovery] industry will be sorely stressed at this point, and it would behoove staffs to consider security as a move to alternate sites is contemplated or enacted.”

At FBI headquarters, the NIPC began what Dick characterized as “harvesting” physical threat information pertaining to critical infrastructures and pushing that data out to thousands of private-sector companies that owned and operated those facilities, such as power plants, telecommunications facilities, water companies, and financial institutions. Dick relied on the FBI’s InfraGard program and the various private-sector-run Information Sharing and Analysis Centers for much of that outreach effort. On September 11, ISACs had already been established in the Financial Services sector, the Electric Power sector, the Telecommunications sector, the Information Technology industry, and the computer software anti-virus industry. In addition, the NIPC would set in motion a daily threat briefing schedule for the Water sector, the Oil and Gas sector, and the Aviation and Railroad sectors.

Accurate and timely information was the only thing that could cut through the fog of war. And the government was doing everything it could to get that information flowing to the right people at the right time."

-- -- -- -- -- --

Secretary of State Colin Powell was in Lima, Peru, attending a meeting of the Organization of American States when he received word of the attacks. He immediately cut his trip short and boarded a government aircraft for the seven-hour flight back to Washington. The former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff understood and appreciated the advantage the U.S. enjoyed over most nations when it came to the advanced electronics and communications capabilities. The former Army General had put his name on various Pentagon war-fighting manuals that outlined the Department’s commitment to what the military called “network-centric warfare” and “information superiority.” He had even written an article in Byte Magazine in 1992 titled “Personal Computer Technology May Determine the Outcome of Future Conflicts.” But what really made Powell’s experience on September 11 unique was his understanding and continued devotion to the military’s decision cycle, known as the OODA loop. OODA is an acronym for the cycle of Observation, Orientation, Decision, and Action. For Powell, it was absolutely critical that he be inside of his counterpart’s or enemy’s loop. But on September 11, Powell got a taste of what communications must have been like for his early nineteenth-century counterparts.

“I never felt more useless in my life than on the morning of the 11th of September,” Powell told members of the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) during a meeting held at the State Department on March 13, 2002. For most of the seven-hour return flight, Powell was unable to communicate with other senior government leaders in Washington. “Phones[were] gone because of what happened here and what happened to the [communications] system here in Washington,” he said. “They couldn’t get a phone line through. I was able to get some radio communications—two radio spots on the way back—but for most of that seven-hour period, I could not tell what was going on here in my capital, and I’m the Secretary of State.”

The implications of the communications failure on September 11 went beyond the seven-hour window during which Powell was unable to communicate with Washington. For Powell, this meant that there was the chance he and his department could be severed from the world again in the future, removing the initiative from America’s diplomatic and foreign policy efforts around the world. “Power to me now, as Secretary of State, is to be inside of everybody else’s information loop or decision loop,” he told the group of telecommunications experts. “I had called the President of Pakistan last Friday [March 8] to talk some business and just as I was concluding I said ‘I’m sorry to hear about the deaths that occurred in Karachi today.’ And he said, ‘what deaths?’ I’m inside his information loop.”

Read this and more about cyber-warfare and 9/11, the NIMDA virus and the E911 virus in my blog entry dated Mar 25 2006 here: http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/for...amp;&st=300


***************

“From the day in April 2007 when I [Mark Gaffney] posted my initial research about this on the Internet, the “debunkers of conspiracy theories” have remained conspicuously silent on the matter. I suspect they have avoided the E-4B fly-over because they are nervous about what they might find if they opened Pandora's Box.”

“While my book was in press I received an email from a staff member of the 9/11 Commission. The staffer, whose name must remain confidential for the present, was involved in the radar analysis for the official 9/11 investigation. He had formerly worked at the Pentagon. The staffer acknowledged that he knew about VENUS 77 (and also SWORD 31, a second E-4B that departed from Andrews AFB at 9:26 AM) but did not investigate either of these command and control flights because he was told by his supervisor, Daniel Marcus, that the US Air Force had already briefed the commissioners about these departures. The staffer assumed the flights had been covered and focused on other issues. Marcus served as the general counsel for the 9/11 Commission and when I contacted him at American University, where he currently teaches law, he confirmed that “sensitive briefings” had indeed taken place. Marcus refused to elaborate, however.

This appears to contradict 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton’s statement to CNN in 2007. During a CNN interview which aired on national television on September 12, 2007, Hamilton stated that his staffers looked into the E-4B fly-over issue, but that it “didn’t rise to the level of a discussion.” Was Hamilton fibbing to CNN? The full story remains to be told.”

http://the911mysteryplane.com/

*********

Google search for “the white mystery plane”
http://www.google.com/search?q=the+white+m...tart=0&sa=N

*********


"The secretive think-tank MITRE corporation is just one of Lincoln Labs’ 80 spin-off companies. MITRE is a private corporation based in Bedford, MA (with both national and international research sites), and it is a major advanced weapons and intelligence think-tank primarily supported by the USAF. From its inception in 1958, MITRE has been pivotal in the development of advanced tactical satellite systems in the 1960s and 1970s.252

Entrenched in UAV technologies, MITRE today plays a major role in classified R&D programs for C4IST/R, electronic warfare, intelligence, and tactical missiles and ballistic missile defense (Star Wars) technologies. As noted above, MITRE is frequently partnered -- on major aerospace and intelligence programs -- with some of the most secretive corporations: SAIC, Polexis, Bechtel, Lockheed Martin, General Atomics and Northrup Grumman."

***

Dov Zakheim

Dov Zakheim, prior to his service within the DoD, was affiliated with System Planning Corporation, a company who "manufactures a highly sophisticated technology that enables an operator to fly by remote control as many as eight different airborne vehicles at the same time from one position either on the ground or airborne".

A member of the Council on Foreign Relations who joined the PNAC in calling for a restructuring of the Middle East, noting that a Pearl Harbor type of event would be needed to foster public support for their radical foreign policy ideas, he was the fellow who misplaced the trillion dollars from within the Pentagon: http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1047.shtml .

*********

Of course, there is widely-available information noted by Mike Ruppert and Indira Singh on the interconnection between MITRE, PTECH and PROmis software. See as well the tale of how future Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff took over the PTECH investigation and buried it. ... which might explain partially why Ruppert's theory has never been proven.

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005...e-of-ptech.html .


*********

http://www.senate.gov/~armed_services/stat...711eberhart.pdf.

UNCLASSIFIED
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNTIL RELEASED BY THE
SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STRATEGIC SUBCOMMITTEE
STATEMENT OF
GENERAL RALPH E. EBERHART, USAF
COMMANDER IN CHIEF
NORTH AMERICAN AEROSPACE DEFENSE COMMAND
AND
UNITED STATES SPACE COMMAND
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE
STRATEGIC SUBCOMMITTEE
11 JULY 2001
UNCLASSIFIED
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNTIL RELEASED BY THE
SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STRATEGIC SUBCOMMITTEE

Page 2

Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee:

It is an honor to appear before you again representing the outstanding men and women of North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and United States Space Command (USSPACECOM).

<snip>

Air Sovereignty.

The traditional NORAD mission of aerospace control, or more specifically airspace sovereignty, remains a fundamental priority. The United States must maintain the radar systems, aircraft and command and control capabilities, which serve as pillars for homeland defense. In addition, we must continue to pursue improved space-based surveillance, intelligence and communications capabilities as essential contributions for NORAD mission success.

Force Enhancement. Our force enhancement efforts over the last decade have helped us "operationalize" space. Global Positioning System (GPS) navigation satellites and our Satellite Communications (SATCOM) systems are fully integrated into the warfighting capabilities of all our Services and Unified Commands. The readiness of our military forces depends on the modernization of these systems.

GPS has become a way of life for both our military and commercial industry around the world. From precision farming to financial transactions to surveying remote parts of the earth's surface, every sector of our society relies on the timing and navigation services provided by this system. As a result, we have initiated a modernization program that will provide a more robust anti-jam capability for our warfighters and additional civil signals for aviation, safety-of-life services and other commercial enterprises. We appreciate Congress' continued support in sustaining and modernizing this national resource.

Reliable and secure SATCOM systems are also key to our military's readiness. We continue to exploit our current SATCOM fleet while developing new, technologically advanced systems. Over the past year, we worked with the other Commanders in Chief to revalidate SATCOM requirements. We reaffirmed the need to modernize our capabilities with a blend of military, civil and commercial systems. As we update our satellites, we cannot forget the user terminals. All aspects of SATCOM must be synchronized for maximum utility. We need your continued support to make this critical modernization effort a reality.

Over the past decade, a significant amount of radio frequency spectrum has been reallocated from the DoD to the Federal Communications Commission for auction to the private sector. Our space and air systems depend upon the spectrum to perform our missions. In order to maintain our state of readiness, we need to carefully consider the national security implications of spectrum reallocations. The FY99 Defense Authorization Act restored some of the spectrum previously reallocated. We appreciate Congress' help; however, we face continued requests for expanded non-federal civil and commercial use of this limited spectrum. For instance, there is a proposal being considered to accelerate the reallocation of the Space Ground Link Subsystem frequency, which supports our on-orbit satellite systems. If this proposal is implemented without adequate alternative spectrum for critical military functions, it will limit our ability to effectively command and control our space assets.

<snip>


********

Can we put to rest once and for all the debunking meme
“how on earth do you think it is possible to get all those people involved
in a conspiracy of this nature?


Clearly those people who say this have extremely limited (if any) experience working in an emergency operating center, incident command center, military command center or participating in inter-linked multi-center drills and exercises. The atmosphere is chaotic and noisy. Read the literature about tactical decision-making in a crisis (TADMUS) that grew out of the USS Vincennnes incident, or the work on situation awareness by Mica Endsley et al that grew out of the on-runway collision of two large commercial aircraft in the Azores. One's attention must be narrowly riveted on critical elements, functions, read-outs, and it is very easy for someone else to effect something nefarious without anyone else being aware.

From Americom:

QUOTE
About National Coordinating Center

The National Coordinating Center (NCC) was established in 1984 as a result of a National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) recommendation to develop a joint government-industry national coordinating mechanism to respond to the Federal Government's National Security and Emergency Preparedness (NS/EP) communications service requirements. Composed of up to 30 industry chief executives representing the major communications and network service providers and information technology, finance, and aerospace companies, the NSTAC provides industry-based advice and expertise to the President on issues and problems related to implementing the NS/EP communications policy. By virtue of its mandate to address NS/EP communications issues, the NSTAC's partnership with government through the National Communications System (NCS) is unique in two ways - direct industry involvement with both the defense agencies and the civil agencies comprising the NCS; and regular, sustained interaction between industry and the NCS member departments and agencies.

Source: http://www.americom-gs.com/media/2003/2003-07-17.html


QUOTE
NCC's goal is to ensure that the government's communications infrastructure is available to make an immediate and coordinated response to all emergencies, such as natural disasters, domestic terrorism, man-made disasters or cyber attacks. The NCC also functions as an Information Sharing and Analysis Center, which gathers information about vulnerabilities, threats, intrusions and anomalies from various telecommunications and government sources and analyzes the data to mitigate the effects on the communications infrastructure. This information is ultimately provided to the President of the United States and his national security team.

***

The Global Dominance Group
9/11 Pre-Warnings & Election Irregularities in Context
by Peter Phillips, Bridget Thornton and Celeste Vogler
projectcensored.org (pdf)

QUOTE
This study examines how interlocking public private partnerships, including the corporate media, public relations firms, military contractors, policy elites, and government officials, jointly support a US military global domination agenda...

(thoroughly referenced)

http://www.projectcensored.org/downloads/G...nance_Group.pdf archive

****

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOMKdILRM5I
warning: this video may have been alteredsee the pods under the podium?


****

“…All things considered, the strikes of September 11, 2001, from the perspective of the skyjackers, amount to a miracle of timing. Let’s start with the timing of appointments of key U.S. personnel.

Part of this topic has been canvassed elsewhere, but a quick overview with the 20-20 of hindsight still comes as something of a shock. Everybody recalls that, among key personnel, Robert Mueller, new Director of the FBI, took his position one week before 9/11. Former FBI man and the globe’s premier bin Laden nemesis John O’Neill had left the Bureau only the month before 9/11, taking his final, fatal position as chief of security at the World Trade Center in August 2001. As everyone also knows by now, the first meeting of Principals regarding counterterrorism – that is, the first time Richard Clarke as counterterrorism chief expert for the executive branch was able to meet with heads of pertinent agencies – was also one week before the attacks, on September 4.

There were other relatively new men in the biggest jobs. The president had announced the appointments of his new Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Richard B. Myers, and of his Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Pete Pace, on August 24, 2001. A brand new member and Chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board was announced on September 4, 2001, along with other appointments including the new Commissioner of Customs. The new Associate Attorney General of the United States was named on September 10, 2001.

The heads of the branches of the armed forces were also comparatively new, although they were at least in their respective positions by the date of the strikes; Thomas E. White at Army, Gordon England at Navy, and Thomas Roche at Air Force had been named in May 2001 and took their offices that summer. A new Assistant Secretary of the Air Force was named on July 31, among other appointments.

The National Operations Manager at the FAA, Ben Sliney, was in his first day on the job on September 11, 2001. Bush’s Director of Security for the FAA, Mike Canavan, was comparatively speaking an old hand, having taken his job at the end of 2000. (Unfortunately, Canavan was in Puerto Rico on 9/11.)”

www.margieburns.com/blog/_archives/2006/7/6/2088660.html

****

Here’s an article on the destruction of the FAA controller tapes: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?p...y6%C2Found=true

No coverup is complete without the destruction of evidence.”

****

Agent Smart: Wait a minute, Chief. If KAOS goes out of business, what happens to us?

Chief: Well, I guess the Control organization would be out of business too. There wouldn't be any need for us.

Agent Smart: Well, maybe we could get together and give KAOS enough money to keep going for a few years.

Chief: Max, that's a ridiculous notion! That would be like the police cooperating with organized crime!

*****

In exchange for theater tickets and limousine-chauffeured dinner dates, employees of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey granted no-show jobs to contractors who were supposed to be clearing wreckage from the World Trade Center, according to Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau. "We were providing checks for employees that did not exist," the Port Authority's inspector general, Robert Van Etten, said.


….


The Total Information Awareness program was ready to roll out before Sept 11, and John Poindexter's office was established in the Pentagon no later than Sept 12.



"Fifteen minutes after JFK is shot, Dallas Police dispatch an APB for a suspect fitting Lee Harvey Oswald's exact description, although Oswald has neither been implicated nor his weapon found. Moments after 9-11 attack, a scorched passport allegedly belonging to an Islamic hijacker is found near the WTC wreckage. Alleged JFK assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was a former CIA operative. Alleged 9-11 mastermind, Osama Bin Ladin, was former CIA operative...”



“U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' pilot, Commander Ralph Kolstad, started questioning the official account of 9/11 within days of the event... Commander Kolstad is especially critical of the account of American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon. He says, "At the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying. [color="#FF8C00"]I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757’s and 767’s and I could not have flown it the way the flight path was described[/color]..."



The National Institute for Standards and Technology has been forced to admit that the total free-fall collapse of the twin towers cannot be explained after an exhaustive scientific study, implicitly acknowledging that controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have come down.


“…the 9/11 Commission’s executive director, Philip Zelikow, engaged in "surreptitious" communications with presidential adviser Karl Rove and other Bush administration officials during the commission’s 20-month investigation into the 9/11 attacks, according to a book entitled The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation, written by the individual who led The New York Times’ coverage of the 9/11 panel.”



“Those who have fully studied the issues and facts concerning 9/11 and the Bush administration's inexplicable coverup and lies understand rationally that this is not a topic of "conspiracy theory" but instead a true scandal of serious proportions. This can no longer be denied.”



"It wasn't a bipartisan commission; it was more like a bipolar commission."

Ray McGovern



Among the words that do not appear in the 9/11 Commission Report:

Building 7, Marvin Bush, Pakistani ISI, John O'Neil, power down, Securacom

****


“Only one force on Earth can directly confront and defeat the U.S. Corporate State and its criminal Government. That force is us, the overwhelming majority of the people in this country.”

-- Don Paul, author, "9/11: Facing Our Fascist State"

****

10-5 the message about the remote controlled plane".

Istoodforu
There were several sightings of the "mystery plane over the WH on 9/11 between 9:30 and 10:00. A CNN videotape accompanying a John King report shows enough details to clearly identify this aircraft as the E4B "doomsday" plane, a modified 747 designed to be an airborne command and control center during a national emergency.


E4B Factsheet

Two theories:

1. Three of these planes were airborne on a routine exercise labeled "Global Guardian" Shortly after the 2nd WTC tower was hit, the exercise was called off and one or pehaps two of these planes responded to the 9/11 emergency by overflying DC to gather information about a possible attack on the capital in accordance with the mission of these planes during such a national emergency.

2. Advanced technology in these air craft was being used to remotely control one or more of the 4 flights involved in the 9/11 attacks, use electronic countermeasures to produce false radar indications for NORAD and ATC, and otherwise disrupt communications needed to scramble fighters to intercept these flights. The "Global Guardian" exercise was a cover story.

In his last post, Mag asks this question:

QUOTE
Can we put to rest once and for all the debunking meme
“how on earth do you think it is possible to get all those people involved
in a conspiracy of this nature?


Clearly those people who say this have extremely limited (if any) experience working in an emergency operating center, incident command center, military command center or participating in inter-linked multi-center drills and exercises. The atmosphere is chaotic and noisy. Read the literature about tactical decision-making in a crisis (TADMUS) that grew out of the USS Vincennnes incident, or the work on situation awareness by Mica Endsley et al that grew out of the on-runway collision of two large commercial aircraft in the Azores. One's attention must be narrowly riveted on critical elements, functions, read-outs, and it is very easy for someone else to effect something nefarious without anyone else being aware.


But could it also be that the E4B crew were just like many other responders on that day-----groping around in the fog of war and trying to get a handle on the situation.
jeffmoskin
QUOTE
Can we put to rest once and for all the debunking meme
“how on earth do you think it is possible to get all those people involved
in a conspiracy of this nature?


Clearly those people who say this have extremely limited (if any) experience working in an emergency operating center, incident command center, military command center or participating in inter-linked multi-center drills and exercises. The atmosphere is chaotic and noisy. Read the literature about tactical decision-making in a crisis (TADMUS) that grew out of the USS Vincennnes incident, or the work on situation awareness by Mica Endsley et al that grew out of the on-runway collision of two large commercial aircraft in the Azores. One's attention must be narrowly riveted on critical elements, functions, read-outs, and it is very easy for someone else to effect something nefarious without anyone else being aware.


The mafia has known for centuries how to cover up a crime.

Kill the perpetrator.

Like Ruby killed Oswald.

Then died.

Clues gone.

So, let us suppose that the 19 hijackers were told that 9/11 was a huge stunt to embarrass the USA. The plan was to hijack the 4 planes with box cutters and muscle, then flip a switch on the control panel to allow remote control of the aircraft by ground personnel

link:

http://geocities.com/mknemesis/homerun.html?20063

The planes would be flown to some obscure military bases, landed, the passengers taken hostage, etc etc.

You make up the story.

My point is that the hijackers may not have known in advance of their fate. It could all have been set up.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.