Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Political Opinion
Common Ground Common Sense > National & International News > Op-Ed Articles from the Mainstream Media
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Snuffysmith

Now Comes The Hard Part
Yesterday, under bright skies and before an estimated crowd of more than a million people gathered on the National Mall, Barack Hussein Obama took the oath of office to become the 44th President of the United States. President Obama marked the historic occasion with a somber but stirring inaugural address, telling America that the "challenges we face" -- real, many, and serious -- "will be met."After eight years of conservative misrule in a complex and changing world, the United States faces war, recession, the climate crisis, and systems of health care and education that continue to fail too many Americans. Obama declared these ills not just a "consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some" but also "our collective failure to make hard choices." He repeated a common theme of his candidacy -- that good government alone is not sufficient to restore America's promise. Instead, "the faith and determination of the American people" set the course of the nation. "Starting today," Obama said, "we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America."

'THE WORK OF REMAKING AMERICA': The Bush administration was marked by a near-ideological adherence to irresponsibility. The dismissal of facts, the failure to plan, and the elevation of politics over competence, led to a host of problems that now consume this nation. Repeatedly, Obama obliquely rebuked the legacy of the previous office-holder. Obama pledged to change the course of government, saying that "our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions -- that time has surely passed." He pledged to "restore science to its rightful place" -- after eight years of "concerted assault" on the environment and inaction on global warming. Obama rejected "as false the choice between our safety and our ideals" -- in contrast to Bush, who personally authorized torture. And he signaled a new course in foreign policy, telling the Muslim world that "we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect."

'THE PRICE AND THE PROMISE OF CITIZENSHIP': In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, Bush rallied the nation to continue shopping. In 2006, with recession looming, Bush asked the American people to "go shopping more." In a stark contrast, Obama defined his ideal of the "price and the promise of citizenship." He called for "a new era of responsibility," in which every American recognizes "that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and our world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character than giving our all to a difficult task." In a service event on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, "when a grateful nation emulates Dr. King's sacrifice and service to others," Obama explained his vision of shared responsibility. "If we're just waiting around for somebody else to do it for us, if we're waiting around for somebody else to clean up the vacant lot or waiting for somebody else to get involved in tutoring a child, if we're waiting for somebody else to do something, it never gets done," he said. "We're going to have to take responsibility -- all of us."

'THE SPIRIT OF SERVICE': Obama honored the men and women of the armed services "not only because they are guardians of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service: a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves," he said. Obama then argued that this spirit "must inhabit us all." this call to service is not new. In the early days of his presidential campaign, Obama "advocated a major expansion of the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps and other national service programs," and established a goal of "50 hours of community service per year for middle and high school students." For MLK Day, Obama asked "all Americans to make an ongoing commitment to better the lives of others." The Obama team established USAService.org, a website meant to be a clearinghouse for service opportunities. Over 11,000 service projects across the country -- "from working in homeless shelters and mentoring young people to assembling more than 80,000 care packages for our troops at a service event here in Washington, D.C." -- were organized on the site. As one volunteer in Albuquerque, NM, told reporters, "More people need to be aware that this isn't just six people building a fence, but instead a community coming together to say, 'All right we're getting involved, we're going to make a difference.'"





ADMINISTRATION -- OBAMA ORDERS HALT TO LAST-MINUTE BUSH REGULATIONS: Hours after being sworn in as America's 44th president, Barack Obama ordered "a freeze on new or proposed regulations at all government agencies and departments" made in the final months and weeks of Bush administration. A memo from White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said that every regulation would have to be reviewed by the department or agency head appointed by Obama. In some cases, however, Obama is too late. For example, "just six weeks ago, the Bush administration issued revised endangered species regulations to reduce the input of federal scientists and to block the law from being used to fight global warming." The rule went into effect before Obama took office, therefore requiring him "to restart the lengthy rulemaking process." For rules that have already taken effect, "the Democratic-controlled Congress might be able to help the Obama administration by using the Congressional Review Act, a legislative tool to bring new federal regulations under scrutiny," notes the AP. Obama will also act to overturn older Bush regulations; one of his first moves in office will be to reverse the "global gag rule" that "prevents federal money from going to international family planning groups that" provide abortion counseling or services.

IRAQ-- IRAQ IS WILLING TO HAVE U.S. WITHDRAW AT A FASTER PACE: In November, the Bush administration and the Iraqi government signed an agreement that would remove all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. With the inauguration of President Obama, who has pledged to withdraw on a 16-month time frame, Iraqi government spokesperson Ali al-Dabbagh said yesterday that government officials support the U.S. leaving "even before the end of 2011." "The government-owned newspaper Al-Sabah reported Wednesday that Iraqi authorities have drafted contingency plans in case Obama orders a 'sudden' withdrawal of all forces and not just combat troops," the AP notes. "We are capable of controlling the situation in the country and we believe we have passed the worst," remarked the chairman of the Iraqi parliament's defense committee, Abbas al-Bayati. Today, Obama will meet with senior commanders to discuss the withdrawal from Iraq. Obama reaffirmed in his inaugural address Tuesday that he would "begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people."

JUSTICE -- FEDERAL JUDGE RULES CHENEY DID NOT INTEND TO ILLEGALLY DISCARD RECORDS: U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly has lifted an injunction mandating the preservation of outgoing Vice President Cheney's records. A group of historians and nonprofit organizations -- including the American Historical Association, the Society of American Archivists, and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington -- filed a joint lawsuit in September asking that Cheney's papers be made public. In her decision, which came on the eve of President Obama's inauguration, Kollar-Kotelly rejected the plaintiffs' claim that Cheney "intended to illegally discard some of his official records." While the Justice Department offered what Kollar-Kotelly called "constantly shifting arguments," that was not enough to undermine the testimony of Claire M. O'Donnell, a Cheney aide, who pledged that "key Cheney documents and other materials will be transferred as required to the National Archives." Stanley I. Kutler of the University of Wisconsin Law School and one of the plaintiffs in the case does not expect Cheney to comply with the law. "When the Archives goes to open Cheney's papers, they are going to find empty boxes," he said. "Why did he fight this order so much if he did not have the intent to leave with these papers?" The DOJ had previously argued, unsuccessfully, that the lawsuit was unconstitutional.

Snuffysmith
Paterson's Giant Mistake - New York Daily News
Thanks, Governor - Chicago Tribune
Unraveling Bush's Excesses - Los Angeles Times
Barney Frank's Hypocrisy - Boston Herald
Snuffysmith
Fear Hath No Shelf-Life: Our Torture Dilemma - Robert Kaplan, Atlantic
The Obama-Kennedy Question - Michael Barone, RealClearPolitics
Obama Brings More Than Charisma - Bob Herbert, New York Times
Why Obama Must Be a Radical - Clive Crook, National Journal
GOP Badly Needs Political Entrepreneurs - Bill Kristol, Weekly Standard
America's Next Step - Mikhail Gorbachev, International Herald Tribune
Netanyahu: Iran Is the Terrorist 'Mother Regime' - Bret Stephens, WSJ
Clinton's Needy Missteps - Colbert King, Washington Post
“Brothers Should Pull Up Their Pants” - Deroy Murdock, Boston Herald
Bush Was a Big-Government Disaster - Nick Gillespie, Reason
Teacher on a World Stage - Jim Hoagland, Washington Post
Nannies, Taxes, Kennedy & Geithner - Eleanor Clift, Newsweek
A Free Pass For Geithner - Jonah Goldberg, National Review
Gitmo & National Security Courts: Poor Law, Poor PR - David Rittgers, RCP
The Rich Still Want to Own Newspapers - Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson, FT
Pro-Life Movement in the Age of Obama - James Antle, American Spectator
Ms. Kennedy Regrets - Larissa MacFarquhar, The New Yorker
Snuffysmith
10 Most Popular Stories

1. Ted Kennedy's Circle Upset by Caroline's Awkward Exit
By Karen Tumulty / Washington By citing "personal reasons" for withdrawing her name from consideration for New York's U.S. Senate seat, was she referring to her uncle's illness?

2. Obama Promises New Destiny, Work Begins Today
By JOE KLEIN Barack Obama's Inauguration showed the world a more sober, civil and exuberant America

3. Obama's Inaugural Address: The Full Tex
By Barack Obama President Barack Obama addresses the nation on January 20, 2009

4. Old Nazi News Makes Headlines in Germany
By Stephanie Kirchner / Berlin Facsimile publications of Hitler-era newspapers prove a big hit in Germany

5. The Story of Barack Obama's Mother
By Amanda Ripley / Honolulu Barack Obama's greatest influence was a woman most know nothing about. How her uncommon life shaped his worldview

6. Michelle Obama's Dress: A Bold Choice in Designer Isabel Toledo
By Kate Betts Choosing an elegant, optimistic yellow, Michelle Obama begins her term as First Lady wearing an ensemble by Cuban-American designer Isabel Toledo

7. How Obama Is Wooing the Military
By Mark Thompson / Washington Obama is taking measures both subtle and loud to make sure he earns the respect and admiration of the men and women in uniform

8. Playboy Shows Signs of Withdrawal
By Belinda Luscombe After 54 years, the thinking man's girly magazine is having a difficult time staying relevant in the Internet age

9. Bright Spot in the Housing Crash: Cheaper Rents
By Barbara Kiviat Rent prices across the U.S. are declining for the first time in six years — and they're likely to continue falling.

10. Shhh. Obama Repeals the Abortion Gag Rule, Very Quietly
By Amy Sullivan / Washington By not making a show of signing the order to repeal what's called the "global gag rule," the new President sent a clear signal he wants to turn down the heat on the divisive issue of abortion
Snuffysmith
PAUL KRUGMAN
Bad Faith Economics
nytimes.com — As the debate over President Obama's economic stimulus plan gets under way, one thing is certain: many of the plan's opponents aren't arguing in good faith. Basically, conservatives are throwing any objection they can think of against the Obama plan, hoping that something will stick.

DEAN BAKER
The Banks Have Stolen Enough; It's Time to Take Them Over
tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com — Hold onto your wallets. The bankers are coming bank for more money. These executives bankrupted their banks and brought the economy down with them. They belong in an unemployment line not collecting multi-million dollar paychecks in their designer office suites. The obvious answer is to take over the insolvent banks, just as we did with the insolvent S&Ls.

ROBERT REICH
How America Embraced Lemon Socialism
robertreich.blogspot.com — America has embraced Lemon Socialism. Taxpayers support the lemons. Capitalism is reserved for the winners.

SAM PIZZIGATI
Have You 'Hurd'? Greed Still Living Large
ourfuture.org — We all know about the greed and grasping at Wall Street's failed giants. But the greed at 'successful' companies elsewhere in America is getting a free pass.

TOM PHILPOTT
Sorry, Miss Jackson
gristmill.grist.org — Few Obama officials have quite as much mess to clean up as EPA administrator Lisa Jackson. As if to warn her of the gravity of her task, the General Accounting Office has just added a key EPA oversight area to its list of government functions that are at "high risk" of "fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement."

PAUL ROSENBERG
Let's Face It
openleft.com — There are millions of perfectly competent, perfectly decent individual conservatives. But when you shift your gaze from their individual lives to the philosophy they share, and its historical record, the conclusion is inescapable: It's a complete disaster, utterly incapable of producing sound, sustainable policies.

TOM SULLIVAN
And Justice For Some
ourfuture.org — President Barack Obama's order to close the Guantanamo Bay prison highlights one of the Bush administration's few successes — the campaign to undermine America's belief in the rule of law.

STEPHEN SCHLESINGER
Bush Did Not Keep Us Safe
huffingtonpost.com — One-time members of the Bush administration are complaining that Obama, as he prepares to close down Guantanamo Bay is dangerously weakening America. Their common assertion is that Bush, through all of the techniques Obama is dismantling, protected America from further attacks. But Mr. Bush did not keep America safe.

PENIEL JOSEPH
President Obama And The Price And Promise Of American Citizenship
tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com — History may well judge Obama's administration in part on his ability to turn eloquent words into bold policy that unites the many strands of American identity, hopes, and dreams into a singular national tapestry that renews the expansive vision of democracy that emboldened many to dream of a day like his inauguration.
Snuffysmith
RADICAL RIGHT
Breaking Free From Rush
Last week, President Obama met with congressional leaders from both parties to discuss his economic recovery program, despite the GOP's apparent reluctance to compromise on the package. Obama told GOP members at the meeting that they need to stop listening to hate radio host Rush Limbaugh if Congress is to accomplish anything. "You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," Obama told Republican leaders. His scolding of the far right came days after Limbaugh notoriously declared, "I hope he fails," referring to Obama. Limbaugh fired back yesterday, stating, "I think Obama wants me to fail." The verbal tit-for-tat between Obama and Limbaugh carries a more significant meaning than what appears on the surface. In this time of crisis, the country needs a strong economic recovery package to be quickly shuttled through Congress and onto Obama's desk. Given that Limbaugh carries tremendous sway over congressional GOP, will they break away from him on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act? Or will they continue to partake in Limbaugh's brand of "reflexive obstructionism?"

HOPING FOR FAILURE: Limbaugh's recent comment saying that he hopes Obama fails as president is deeply hypocritical. Conservatives long claimed that any criticism of President Bush's policies was evidence that liberals "want[ed] Bush to fail." For example, during the debate over Iraq, perhaps the most frequent right-wing talking point was that liberals wanted to "surrender." This straw man argument, of course, had no basis in reality. Yet today, with a progressive at the country's helm, Limbaugh is perfectly content saying that he wants the President to fail at reviving the economy. The comment also underscores just how radical Limbaugh is. Even fellow conservative talk radio host Bill Bennett hinted at disagreement, stating, "The locution 'I want him to fail' is not what you say the first week the man's been inaugurated." Limbaugh also remarked last week, "We are being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles, bend over forward, backward, whichever, because his father was black, because this is the first black president."

FOLLOWING RUSH: Nevertheless, despite his radical and hateful views, Limbaugh has held considerable influence on the actions of the congressional GOP. His role in pulling the GOP away from immigration reform in 2007 was undeniable. His rants on the Fairness Doctrine culminated in legislation from Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN). Last year, when Limbaugh infamously referred to U.S. soldiers in Iraq who were critical of the war as "phony soldiers," the congressional GOP rushed to his defense. Rep. Jack Kingston (R-GA), for example, introduced a resolution "commending Rush Hudson Limbaugh III for his ongoing public support of American troops serving both here and abroad." Furthermore, GOP members have long boasted about their close relationship with Rush. "I mean, there's nothing particularly inflammatory about anything Rush Limbaugh says," Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said in 2002. In 1994, former House speaker Newt Gingrich made Limbaugh an honorary member of the 104th Congress.

GOP OBSTRUCTIONISM: In recent weeks, Limbaugh has been mounting a fight against Obama's ambitious recovery package. "Obama's plan would buy votes for the Democrat Party, in the same way FDR's New Deal established majority power for 50 years of Democrat rule," he said last week. The question going forward is whether congressional conservatives will work with Obama to pass a strong recovery package or continue to buckle under Limbaugh's demands. Thus far, the signs are discouraging. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) -- who said this week that he will not vote for the recovery as it stands -- and Limbaugh have been marching in lockstep in harping on the inclusion of family planning funding in the legislation. Several other prominent conservatives are buckling to their right-wing base in publicly opposing the recovery. Limbaugh has also made Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner his punching bag in recent weeks, upping the pressure around the controversy over Geithner's taxes. Yesterday, Geithner was confirmed by a 60-34 Senate vote. "[C]onservative talk radio rallied a flood of calls to Capitol Hill on Monday opposing his nomination. A majority of Senate Republicans heeded those calls," observes Politico.



ECONOMY -- CONSERVATIVES PEDDLE MYTH THAT STIMULUS SPENDS $275,000 FOR EVERY JOB CREATED: Over the past few weeks, conservatives have been staking out their opposition the economic recovery package by peddling a <a target="_blank" href="http://app.mx3.americanprogressaction.org/e/er.aspx?s=785&lid=15096&elq=53F64756CFC44CA18172745ED5C2DE44">variety of myths. One favorite is that taxpayers will be forced to pay $275,000 for every job created by the plan. "All told, the plan would spend a whopping $275,000 in taxpayer dollars for every new job it aims to create, saddling each and every household with $6,700 in additional debt," House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) said. "It is more than likely the private sector could have created more than one job for $275,000," according to Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA). Nobel laureate Paul Krugman addressed this "bogus talking point" yesterday in his New York Times column, saying that it "involves taking the cost of a plan that will extend over several years, creating millions of jobs each year, and dividing it by the jobs created in just one of those years," Krugman wrote. Time's Joe Klein called the number "phony-baloney propaganda," while economist Dean Baker noted that "the media have been typically derelict in simply reporting this number without making any assessment to evaluate it." And as Center for American Progress Action Fund senior fellow and budget expert Scott Lilly pointed out, the actual cost per job is closer to $50,000, without taking into account the "substantial number of additional jobs [created] beyond 2012."

CONGRESS -- McCAIN VOTES AGAINST CONFIRMING GEITHNER AFTER SAYING HE WOULD SUPPORT HIM: Yesterday, the Senate confirmed former New York Federal Reserve president Timothy Geithner as the new Treasury Secretary with a vote of 60 to 34. Geithner was sworn in last night by President Obama, who said, "Tim's work and the work of the entire Treasury Department must begin at once." Thirty Republicans, including Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), voted against Geithner in their "first organized attempt to embarrass President Obama," noted Politico. McCain's vote, however, contradicts the position he took last week when CNN's Larry King asked him if he would vote for Geithner. "Yes. Most likely," he replied, adding that though he was "concerned about this tax issue and also the role that he played in the TARP," he believed that the president should "be able to appoint the president's team." Last week, McCain stepped in to help another one of Obama's nominees, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose confirmation had been delayed in a procedural move by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX). "I think the message that the American people are sending us right now is that they want us to work together and get to work," said McCain.

WOMEN'S RIGHTS -- IS ADMINISTRATION CAVING TO THE RIGHT ON FAMILY PLANNING IN RECOVERY BILL?: At President Obama's behest, House Democrats are "nearly certain" to strike funding for family planning and programs battling the spread of sexually transmitted diseases from the economic stimulus package, according to press reports. "The principles of what he [Obama] thought should be in the package -- that wasn't part of that," said White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton. Conservatives have been pushing the lie that progressives think birth control is the answer to the country's economic crisis, and Obama is "eager" to knock out this potential conservative attack line. Like less controversial measures to the bill, this funding allocation supports states and will promote a healthier, more productive workforce by providing women access to services to prevent unplanned pregnancies and promote maternal and infant health -- not abortion. No one would be forcing states to pay for family planning services. States can now cover low-income women if they get a state waiver, but approval can take a long time. Despite these bureaucratic hassles, 27 states have already "obtained federal approval to extend Medicaid eligibility for family planning services to individuals who would otherwise not be eligible." This bill would simply allow states to skip the administrative delays.

Snuffysmith
Congress Must Focus Stimulus Package - San Francisco Chronicle
Hiking Fuel Rules Won't Get America Working - Detroit News
New Day on Climate Change - New York Times
Drill Like Brazil - Investor's Business Daily
Snuffysmith
Geography Divides Democrats Over Energy - New York Times
Cantor Whips Votes, Raises Cash - Politico
Bunning Draws Challenger for 2010 - Lexington Herald-Leader
Obama, Fenty Assist D.C. Voting Rights - The Hill
Snuffysmith
Al-Arabiya Gets Obama Interview - Joe Gandelman, Moderate Voice
Hearts and Minds... - Steve Benen, Washington Monthly
Dems To Drop Family Planning - Marc Ambinder, Atlantic
Contraception Under Obama's Bus - Michelle Malkin, MichelleMalkin.com
Birth Control As a Stimulus - Betsy Newmark, Betsy's Page
Snuffysmith
GOP's Best Weapon is Obama Himself
- Fred Barnes, Weekly Standard
The Gray Lady Turns a Deathly Shade of Pale
- Tom Lifson, Am. Thinker
Enough Happy Talk
- Jennifer Rubin, Commentary
A Wonderful Day for Washington, D.C.
- Christopher Hitchens, Slate
Snuffysmith

Arianna Huffington: The Era of Not Getting It: The Marie Antoinettes of the Meltdown


Tony Blankley nailed it on our radio show when he said that far too many Wall Street CEOs "have been studying at the Marie Antoinette School of Public Presentation." Among those following in the footsteps of the tone deaf queen and her "let them eat cake" is former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain, the poster child for the modern era of Not Getting It -- with his $1.2 million office makeover while preparing to lay off thousands. But Thain is not alone. Execs at Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and State Street have also shown themselves to be tone deaf. So has Barney Frank who secured bailout money for a home state bank that had been accused of poor lending practices and that made Marie Antoinette moves such as providing a Porsche SUV for executives to use. Not Getting It: There is no substitute.

Read Post
Snuffysmith

The Progressive National Security Era
While President Obama's interview with Al Arabiya -- his first interview since taking office on Jan. 20 -- signaled a new rhetorical posture toward the world, his initial appointments and directives have shown that, unlike the previous administration, this president intends to put policy weight behind that rhetoric and effect a significant change in U.S. foreign policy. In the first week of his administration, Obama "gave his national security team a new mission to end the war in Iraq," as he had promised during the campaign. The President "revoked all executive directives issued by the CIA between Sept. 11, 2001, and Jan. 20, 2009," that have been used to justify torture. He created a commission to examine options for closing the Guantanamo Bay prison, which has been a source of outrage around the world, with the goal of shutting it down within a year. The President empowered high-level envoys for two key areas -- George Mitchell for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Richard Holbrooke for Afghanistan and Pakistan -- signaling that these conflicts will receive the sort of presidential attention that they sorely lacked over the last eight years.

HITTING THE GROUND RUNNING: In December, even before Obama took office, it was clear that he and his national security team intended to enact "a sweeping shift of priorities and resources in the national security arena." Reporting on the selection of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, James L. Jones as National Security Adviser, and Obama's retention of Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense, the New York Times quoted a senior Obama adviser as saying that all three have embraced "a rebalancing of America's national security portfolio" after an emphasis on military capabilities during the Bush years. Another senior adviser, Denis McDonough, noted that the new direction was "a pragmatic solution to a long-acknowledged problem," signifying a recognition of "the need to strengthen and integrate the other tools of national power to succeed against unconventional threats." Appearing before Congress yesterday to discuss Afghanistan, Gates affirmed this view, making clear that he sees "no purely military solution" for the insurgency, preferring a "fully integrated civil-military strategy."

GENERATING NEW IDEAS: Many of the ideas that underpin the Obama administration's new foreign policy direction have been developed by progressive thinkers at or associated with the Center for American Progress. In 2004, amid the unilateralist militarism of President Bush's "war on terror," CAP-affiliated scholar Suzanne Nossel argued that progressives had "a historic opportunity to reorient U.S. foreign policy around an ambitious agenda...that renders more effective the fight against terrorism but that also goes well beyond it -- focusing on the smart use of power to promote U.S. interests through a stable grid of allies, institutions, and norms." Likewise, a 2005 CAP report, Integrated Power, called for "wholesale changes in the way the United States engages with the developing world." Integrated Power identified three main threats faced by the United States: "global terrorist networks, extreme regimes, and weak and failing states." It argued that the Bush administration's approach "has not only been ineffective at confronting these threats, but it has eroded America's global leadership position and exposed us to new dangers." In 2008, CAP published a series of reports on "Sustainable Security," which Senior Fellow Gayle Smith described as "a fundamental shift from our outdated notion of national security to a more modern concept of sustainable security -- that is, our security as defined by the contours of a world gone global and shaped by our common humanity." In their book The Prosperity Agenda, authors Nancy Soderberg, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and Brian Katulis, a Senior Fellow at CAP, argued that ameliorating global deprivation and improving governance must be seen as a U.S. national security imperative, one that requires the application of the full range of American power, not just military.

FAREWELL TO FAILED POLICIES: In his inaugural address, President Obama stated, "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." His first presidential directives have shown a commitment to both. Some conservatives have tried to argue that Obama's national security policies don't represent much of a change from the Bush administration. Appearing on on NBC's "Today" show, former Bush adviser Karl Rove said Obama's team is "a reminder that continuity exists particularly in our foreign and international relations." Thankfully, this is untrue. Where there is continuity, it is only because Bush, in the last years of his administration, had out of necessity moved away from the more extreme conservative policies that have proven so disastrous for America's security. Bush's acceptance of a withdrawal timeline from Iraq, after years of refusing one, and his 11th hour attempt to broker Israeli-Palestinian peace, are examples of these shifts. But unlike the previous president, in the first days of administration, Obama has shown -- with both words and deeds -- that he will not wait until the last days of his term to confront America's national security challenges, and that he will embrace new solutions for dealing with those challenges.



WOMEN'S RIGHTS -- OBAMA SET TO SIGN FAIR PAY LEGISLATION: Tomorrow, President Obama will sign into law his first significant piece of legislation as president when he signs the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in an East Room signing ceremony. The bill essentially overturns a 2007 Supreme Court decision and allows workers to "bring a lawsuit for up to six months after they receive any paycheck that they allege is discriminatory." The Court had ruled that workers had only six months from the very first discriminatory paycheck, even if they did not know they were being discriminated against. The House had passed a similar bill last year, but it was blocked by conservatives in the Senate and faced a veto threat from President Bush. At the time, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said women simply needed "education and training" to secure equal pay, and said the law would only "help trial lawyers." This time around, the bill passed with strong bipartisan support, winning 61 votes in the Senate; President Obama called the bill a priority during his campaign, and invited Ledbetter to join him on his pre-inaugural train ride on the way to Washington. Countering conservatives' complaints that the bill would open companies to lawsuits, Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), the bill's chief sponsor, offered this advice to employers: "If you don't want to be sued, don't discriminate."

HEALTH CARE -- CONSERVATIVES ONCE AGAIN FIGHT HEALTH INSURANCE FOR CHILDREN: Last year, President Bush vetoed legislation providing health insurance to low-income children, known as the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). This year, congressional Democrats are introducing an SCHIP bill that would expand the program by $32.8 billion over four and a half years and provide coverage for roughly four million previously uninsured children. The new bill would also eliminate "a five-year waiting period for new, legal immigrant children and mothers to enroll in the program, slightly loosening identity requirements, and in some cases loosening family income limits on eligibility for SCHIP coverage." But congressional Republicans are bent on staging a fight over the new bill. "Our Democratic colleagues have gone back on many of the prior agreements that were reached in creating that bill last year," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). As the Wonk Room noted, "forcing immigrant children to go five years without affordable insurance only increases SCHIP’s costs once the now sicker children become eligible for insurance." Some conservatives are trotting out the same talking points that were used last year to fight the popular legislation, calling it "socialism" and stoking baseless fears about massive federal bureaucracy. Democrats are hoping to pass the bill by the end of the week.

JUSTICE -- WATCHDOG GROUPS DEMAND THE RELEASE OF SECRET BUSH ADMINISTRATION MEMOS: Seizing on President Obama's executive order last week proclaiming "a new era of openness" in Washington, two watchdog groups have asked the White House to release key documents that the Bush administration previously fought to keep secret. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sent a letter today to the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) requesting the release of "at least 50" DOJ memos that were used as the legal foundation for approving torture, warrantless wiretapping, and secret prisons. "We don't have anything resembling a full picture of what happened over the last eight years and on what grounds the Bush administration believed it could order such methods," said Jameel Jaffer of the ACLU. The request came after Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) demanded the release of "a broad spectrum" of Bush administration documents previously withheld from the public. CREW asked for documents related to Vice President Cheney's interview with the FBI during their investigation of the CIA leak scandal, the disappearance of White House e-mails, and President Bush's role in the U.S. Attorney firings. "Signing an executive order is one thing," said CREW's Melanie Sloan. "Actually releasing documents is another." Dawn Johnsen, Obama's nominee to head the OLC, has previously indicated her belief that such documents should be made public.




House Democrats are stripping funding for the National Mall from the recovery legislation, after a <a target="_blank" href="http://app.mx3.americanprogressaction.org/e/er.aspx?s=785&lid=15072&elq=32F42A01A4454131B664B4E53431C32B">wave of right-wing criticism. The move came after President Obama's chief of staff Rahm Emanuel "hosted eleven relatively moderate House Republicans...hoping to secure their support." Family planning funding was also stripped from the bill earlier this week.

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) say they want "100 percent" opposition to the recovery package. In a House GOP meeting yesterday, no Republicans "spoke up in disagreement when urged to oppose the legislation by their leaders."

The economic stimulus plan "would shower the nation's school districts, child care centers and university campuses with $150 billion in new federal spending, a vast two-year investment that would more than double the Department of Education's current budget." The expenditures "amount to the largest increase in federal aid since Washington began to spend significantly on education after World War II."

A new report from the American Society of Civil Engineers has "assigned an overall D grade to the nation’s infrastructure and estimated that it would take a $2.2 trillion investment from all levels of government over the next five years to bring it into a state of good repair."

Al Gore will testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and urge Congress "not to be sidetracked by the current financial crisis and to take 'decisive action' this year to reduce the heat-trapping gases responsible for global warming." "It starts with the passage of President Barack Obama's stimulus bill in its entirety," Gore told the AP. "And then, secondly, we need to put a price on carbon by passing cap and trade legislation."

After forcing Senate Democrats to delay Attorney General nominee Eric Holder's confirmation vote, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) announced yesterday he would support Holder’s nomination. "I think that Mr. Holder is entitled to the benefit of the doubt in the context of the excellent record he has," Specter said.

The U.N.'s International Labor Organization warned that up to "51 million jobs worldwide could disappear by the end of this year as a result of the...global employment crisis," driving worldwide unemployment to 7.1 percent. Even under the most optimistic scenario, the U.N. panel expects at least 18 million people to loose their jobs by the end of 2009, with developing countries suffering the most.

President Obama plans to "adopt a tougher line toward Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, as part of a new American approach to Afghanistan that will put more emphasis on waging war than on development." The new strategy will include "provincial leaders as an alternative to the central government" and leave “nation-building increasingly to European allies."

And finally: First the Jonas Brothers, now Harry Potter. In an interview with the Daily Beast, British actor Daniel Radcliffe says that he is "so proud and happy" for this country because President Obama is "everything the rest of the world liked about America and now likes again." He later extends a special offer: a "public invitation to the Obamas that if their daughters would like a private tour of the Harry Potter set, I would be honored to be their personal tour guide."

Snuffysmith
SAM STEIN
Bailed-Out Bankers Plotted Against EFCA huffingtonpost.com — Three days after receiving $25 billion in federal bailout funds, Bank of America hosted a conference call with conservative activists and business officials to organize opposition to the U.S. labor community's top legislative priority.

ROBERT B. REICH
The Union Way Up latimes.com — America, and its faltering economy, need unions to restore prosperity to the middle class.

WILLIAM RIVERS PITT
America Needs a Job truthout.org — America needs a job. The Republicans who have jobs and are thwarting this stimulus package should be ashamed. More to the point, they should be dismissed with cause. They do not deserve to be laid off, but should be fired outright.

DAVID ROBERTS
Everybody Loves Stimulus gristmill.grist.org — Obama doesn't need to back away from investment to appease conservatives.

JEREMY BRECHER AND BRENDAN SMITH AND TIM COSTELLO
The Financial Crisis Is Too Dire to Be Left to Politicians alternet.org — Current leaders of the world's nations have utterly failed to develop a solution. Now it's up to ordinary citizens.

DAN KAUFMANN
Corruption And The Global Financial Crisis forbes.com — The financial debacle has many causes and implications, but it would be wrong to underestimate systemic corruption.

WINOGRAD AND HAIS

New Rules for a New Era ndnblog.org — Makeovers or realignments change almost everything about U.S. politics — election results, public policy, and presidential behavior. Apparently not everyone has noticed this change.

MIKE LUX
History's Lesson: No Progress Without Struggle openleft.com — History doesn't really support the whole post-partisan, bring-everybody-together theory of change. Every big change in American history has only come after a very intense and rancorous battle to the end between progressives and conservatives.

FRANK SCHAEFFER
Limbaugh and Al-Qaeda Agree huffingtonpost.com — Rush Limbaugh and the Al-Qaeda have something in common: they both are afraid President Obama will succeed.
Snuffysmith
BERNIE HORN
Obama's Economic Recovery Plan Is Almost As Pure As Ivory Soap President Obama's economic recovery plan is a remarkably "clean" bill. Only between 1.5 percent and 3 percent is being wasted on tax cuts for business. Put another way, the bill is about 98 percent pure — money dedicated to good, progressive causes.

ISAIAH J. POOLE

Infrastructure Grade: D. Conservative Grade: F. The American Society of Civil Engineers' preliminary release today of its 2009 Report Card on Infrastructure lays bare the toll conservative ideology has taken on our transportation system, public facilities, water network and power grid.

DAVID SIROTA

Economic Stimulus Bill: Sound Policy vs. D.C. "Bipartisanship" On Rachel Maddow's MSNBC show last night, I discuss a key question I first began raising weeks ago: How much should taxpayers have to pay for political aesthetics? Let's look at the facts surrounding the legislative wrangling over the economic recovery package.
Snuffysmith
HEALTH CARE
Obstructing Children's Health Care
On Wednesday, the House is expected to pass the Senate version of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) reauthorization bill. The legislation renews the joint state-federal program, spends an additional $32.8 billion to expand coverage to four million more children and gives states the option of extending health coverage to legal immigrant children. "Governors, business executives and consumer advocates lobbied for the expansion, arguing that more and more families have sought the assistance in this weakened economy," notes the Washington Postl. "During this economic turmoil, it is critical that we maintain and strengthen this important lifeline to our nation's children and that we help financially strapped states respond to the growing need for affordable health-care coverage," said Cindy Mann, executive director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Yet despite the broad consensus, the bill passed the Senate on the heels of "rancorous debate," as Republican lawmakers introduced numerous amendments to water down the legislation and limit its reach. GOP lawmakers in both the House and the Senate objected to a provision allowing states to eliminate the five year waiting period for immigrants to obtain health coverage and criticized the bill for expanding eligibility to too many low-income children.

DENYING THE AFFORDABILITY PROBLEM: Republicans maintained that no expansion should occur until the very poorest children -- those at 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Line -- are covered and argued that expanding children's health insurance would force millions of children with private coverage into a public program. But as a new report by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Urban Institute concludes, health insurance costs have risen so much that even for families at 300 percent of the Federal Poverty Line, employer sponsored insurance premiums for family now make up as much as "19 percent of income on average for a family of four." Indeed, health insurance premiums have grown faster than paychecks, placing health insurance out of reach for many working class families. Despite 44 states facing budget shortfalls and many "scrambling for months to cut aid to schools, universities and, increasingly, residents who rely on the state for medical care," Republican were concerned about too many children being 'crowded into' public coverage. But as the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities explains, "crowd-out is not the same as voluntarily dropping private health insurance for public program coverage." In fact, a "Congressionally-mandated 10-state evaluation of SCHIP found that while 28 percent of newly enrolled children had private coverage before joining SCHIP, half of them — or 14 percent —lost their private insurance for involuntary reasons before enrolling in SCHIP, such as when parents lost their jobs or became divorced or employers stopped offering health insurance fordependents." As Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) pointed out, "It's the cost of private insurance that excludes them from having coverage. More and more Americans are losing coverage because they can’t afford it. Small businesses can't afford to provide it."

DENYING THE PROBLEM OF LEGAL IMMIGRANT CHILDREN: During a debate about expanding health care coverage to more children, Republican lawmakers tried to turn the conversation to immigration reform. Explaining his support for a provision that currently subjects most legal permanent residents to a five-year ban on eligibility for Medicaid and SCHIP, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said, "I simply cannot support a CHIP bill that allows states to cover legal immigrant children when there are 6 million at the 200% level and below eligible for [S]CHIP and Medicaid. These children ought to be our first priority." But since the five-year waiting period was instituted in 1996, immigrant children and pregnant women with no other source of coverage have been prevented from obtaining essential health care. The ban has contributed to "higher costs for emergency room visits and poorer health outcomes," "exacerbated the disparity in health coverage between immigrants and native citizens," contributed to the increasing uninsured rates among immigrants, and "shifted the burden of covering this population to states and local safety net providers." But the argument for including tax-paying non-citizens in the SCHIP program is as much economic as it is moral. Forcing immigrant children to go five years without seeing a medical professional only increases SCHIP's costs once the now sicker children become eligible for insurance. In fact, diagnosing and treating childhood diabetes or asthma before those conditions progress, improves the health status of the patient and saves money on costly treatments within the system.

MOVING AHEAD ON AFFORDABLE HEALTH REFORM: The swift passage of children's health shows that comprehensive health reform is possible, despite the complexity of the problems. But we cannot stop here; the current economic crisis demands that we reform the broken health care system. Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, has declared that "you never want a serious crisis to go to waste." As Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman points out, "F.D.R. was able to enact Social Security in part because the Great Depression highlighted the need for a stronger social safety net. And the current crisis presents a real opportunity to fix the gaping holes that remain in that safety net, especially with regard to health care."



RADICAL RIGHT -- LOYAL BUSHIES CREATE BUSH-CHENEY ALUMNI WEBSITE, AIMS TO 'HELP BUILD A LASTING LEGACY': Even before President Bush left office, he and his loyal Bushies were <a target="_blank" href="http://app.mx3.americanprogressaction.org/e/er.aspx?s=785&lid=15371&elq=F4C337DDBE724980BA159C6BA1352F9A">hard at work shaping his legacy, comparing him to Abraham Lincoln and claiming his failed policies were smashing successes. Work on his presidential library has also been increasing in recent months. The newest installment of "George Bush is a wonderful person" is now online: the Bush-Cheney Alumni Association website. All Bush employees, appointees, interns, campaign donors, and volunteers are eligible to join. The site's mission is to be "a forum in which alumni can stay connected and help build a lasting legacy for President George W. Bush and the Bush-Cheney Administration." The site contains a considerable amount of hagiography, with the highlighted "Bush Record Documents" compilations called: "Praise For President's Accomplishments" and "More Praise For President's Accomplishments." Many of the articles were written by conservative columnists or former Bush aides. These loyal Bushies have also set up several Facebook pages, including "Bush Cheney Alumni" and "Bush-Cheney Administration Alumni." Users on those sites have left comments such as: "Is it too soon to miss them?" and "Got a kiss from W yesterday at his farewell ceremony at Andrews :o(."

IRAQ -- AUDITOR: RECONSTRUCTION IN IRAQ WAS A FAILURE: Today, Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) Stuart Bowen will release a book, published by the bipartisan Commission on Wartime Contracting, that "concludes that the U.S. reconstruction effort in Iraq was a failure, largely because there was no overall strategy behind it," the Washington Post reports. The book, called "Hard Lessons," portrays "in colorful detail" the internal Bush administration fights over responsibility for reconstruction, detailing "an argument between Rumsfeld and Rice in the fall of 2003 during which each said the other was in charge of supervising the Coalition Provisional Authority." There are now 154 open criminal investigations into allegations of bribery, conflicts of interest, bid rigging, and theft from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The book is hardly the first reporting of the massive waste in Iraq funding: In 2007, a SIGIR report found $5.1 billion in expenses for Iraq's reconstruction were charged without any documentation, and a Government Accountability Office report cited another $10 billion in wasteful or poorly tracked spending. Last year, the GAO Comptroller testified that a "significant" amount of U.S. funds were being funneled to Sunni and Shi'ite militias. Bowen said that many of the same mistakes will likely happen in Afghanistan. "None of the substantive changes in oversight, contracting and reconstruction planning or personnel assignments that Congress, auditors and outside experts proposed as the Iraq debacle unfolded has been implemented in Afghanistan," the Post reports.

ENERGY -- ECONOMIC RECOVERY PLAN'S BOLD MOVE TO REPOWER AMERICA: President Obama's recovery plan makes a bold investment in the modernization of our electricity infrastructure, in order to transform an often-overwhelmed patchwork of balkanized regional networks into a national "smart grid" based on Internet-like technology. In addition to a $20 billion investment in smart grid deployment, the recovery plan offers $2 billion in grants to promote a subtle but key shift in electric utility regulatory policy that "decouples" energy industry profits from demand. Electric utilities traditionally make higher profits when they sell more electricity to consumers. The key problem is that this discourages utilities from promoting conservation and efficiency -- instead, the more wasteful their consumers are, the better. So demand goes up, utilities build new, expensive, and polluting power plants, and still costs rise. Utility shareholders' interests are pitted against the rest of society. In response, several states have implemented policies that decouple profitability ("recovery of prudent fixed costs of service") from demand ("retail sales"), by using public funds and rate adjustments to guarantee an expected annual profit for the utility company and to subsidize investment in energy efficiency. Obama's economic recovery package contains $2 billion in state-level block grants that will be released "only if the governor of the recipient State notifies the Secretary of Energy that the governor will seek, to the extent of his or her authority, to ensure" that decoupling and energy efficiency incentive programs will occur.

Snuffysmith
Daschle Should Withdraw - New York Times
Dodd's Peek-A-Boo Disclosure - Wall Street Journal
How Much Will Steele Change the GOP? - Los Angeles Times
Did the DCCC Miss Mr. Obama's Memo? - Washington Post
Snuffysmith
Gregg to be Commerce Secretary - Justin Gardner, Donklephant
GOP Rolled by Gregg Pick? - John McCormack, The Blog
Is Gregg Pick About Passing the Stimulus? - Todd Beeton, MyDD
Dems Won't Get 60 - Donny Shaw, Open Congress
Lynchian Bargain - D-Day
Snuffysmith
A History Lesson for Rush Limbaugh
- James Carville, CNN
Strange Stimulus Legislation
- George Will, Newsweek
The Daschle Embarrassment
- Dick Polman, Philadelphia Inquirer
The Republican Revival is Underway
- Reihan Salam, Forbes
Snuffysmith
ARIANNA HUFFINGTON
Clueless on CNBC huffingtonpost.com — CNBC's Mark Haines called me "clueless" for suggesting that taxpayers should stop subsidizing equity holders in insolvent banks. I missed the chapter in Adam Smith — or Ayn Rand for that matter — where it says that equity holders in insolvent banks need to be paid taxpayer-funded dividends. So, who's "clueless"?

GEORGE SOROS
We Can Do Better Than a 'Bad Bank' online.wsj.com — And we already have the resources to recapitalize lenders.

MARTIN WOLF
Why Davos Man is Waiting for Obama to Save Him ft.com — A hyperpower's place is in the wrong. Yet, however easy it may be to blame the U.S. for the current global economic woes, it is also to the U.S. that the world looks for a solution.

ROBERT B. REICH
Tom Daschle and the Populist Revolt robertreich.blogspot.com — What's going on here? Maybe official Washington, much like most of Wall Street, is still not quite getting it.

EUGENE ROBINSON
Who Knew Bankers Were This Stupid? truthdig.com — Earth to Wall Street: It's over, people. You had a terrific run, better than you deserved, but now you'd be wise to pay attention to those citizens outside — the ones with the pitchforks and the torches.

CHUCK COLLINS
Rein in Runaway CEO Pay We need to curb the audacity of greed. We need to do more than condemn Wall Street firms paying $18 billion in bonuses after receiving bailout funds. We need to get that money back, and then rein in runaway CEO pay across corporate America.

SIMON ROSENBERG
Spend? Save? What Is the Right Course Now for Everyday Americans? ndnblog.org — In discussions of the stimulus, particularly in defense of the tax cuts, you hear about the need to put money in people's pockets so they will go out and spend,

accelerating economic activity, helping bring about an end to the recession. But is this really the best course for American families now?

THE REAL NEWS

Obama's Afghanistan Dilemma consortiumnews.com — The war in Afghanistan is one of President Barack Obama's most challenging foreign policy problems, in part because it was allowed to get worse over the past five years as the Bush administration concentrated on Iraq.

KERRY TRUEMAN

The Bitter Taste of "Lemon Socialism": Let Them Eat Crap openleft.com — Thanks to our tanking economy, folks are eating crap en mass. Who knew that a pyramid scheme would generate its own food pyramid?
Snuffysmith
President Obama Shames Wall St. Bankers - New York Daily News
Progress in Iraq - Miami Herald
A Whiff of Smoot-Hawley - Rocky Mountain News
Move Over, Subprime - The Economist
Snuffysmith
Senate Agrees to Dilute 'Buy America' - New York Times
Faith-Based Program Gets Wider Focus - Wall Street Journal
Obama Breaks Five-Day Pledge - Politico
GOP Renews Calls for Rangel to Step Down - CQ Politics
Snuffysmith
Dems Should Take Blame on the Stimulus - Jim Geraghty, Campaign Spot
Obama Lost Control Of Agenda - Jon Gandelman, Moderate Voice
Stimulus Defenders Speak - Sam Stein, Huffington Post
Stimulus Bill Not Dead Yet - Alex Koppelman, War Room
Panetta's Pinata - Don Surber, Daily Mail
Snuffysmith
ABOR
Shutting Out Solis
President Obama has nominated his top appointees at a record speed -- far faster than his two immediate predecessors, but the confirmation process has been far slower for him. Even after a rocky transition, President Clinton had all but one cabinet nominee confirmed by the end of his first day in office; President Bush had all but one confirmed by the end of January, despite the lengthy 2000 recount. Some of Obama's confirmation problems have been a result of the nominees' own errors -- as with Timothy Geithner and Tom Daschle -- but others have been caused by nothing more than conservative obstruction. In particular, the widely praised Hilda Solis, currently a Democratic U.S. representative from California, is being blocked by Senate Republicans for her progressive views supporting American workers. "This is just harassment," said Scott Lilly, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. "I haven't seen anything that has been raised that looks like a truly substantive question about whether President Obama should have her serve him as labor secretary." After waiting 55 days since her nomination on Dec. 19, Solis will finally face a scheduled vote in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee today.

REBUILDING THE ECONOMY BY STRENGTHENING WORKERS: Solis has been one of Congress's strongest backers of the Employee Free Choice Act, serving as a co-sponsor of the measure in 2007. "The Employee Free Choice Act provides more protections for workers and requires employers have to recognize a union elected by authorization cards," wrote Solis, the daughter of an immigrant union family, on the Huffington Post that same year. "The current system stacks the deck against workers." Indeed, under the current system, employees who have the option to join a union are regularly intimidated and pressured by management against doing so. At a time when the economy is struggling and workers are facing layoffs and pay cuts, the case for increased participation in organized labor is stronger than ever. As the SEIU notes, workers in unions "earn 14 percent higher wages than workers who are not, are 28 percent more likely to have health insurance, and 54 percent more likely to have a pension." However, the Center for American Progress's David Madland and Berkeley Professor Harley Shaiken write that even "non-union workers -- particularly in highly unionized industries -- receive financial benefits from employers who increase wages to match what unions would win in order to avoid unionization."

A 'PROXY FIGHT FOR EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE': The right wing strongly opposes EFCA and any attempts to increase participation in unions, arguing that the bill unnecessary, "a threat to one of the fundamentals of democracy," and an attempt to "Europeanize America." Last month, Senate Republicans initially attempted to passive-aggressively bury Solis in paperwork, saying that they needed her to clarify her position on the Employee Free Choice Act. As CQ wrote on Jan. 29, "Although the written questionnaires don't constitute an official hold on Solis' nomination, the paperwork has the same delaying effect." The New York Times similarly remarked, "The delay in confirming Ms. Solis isn't because the Senate needs to know more. It's a way for Republican senators to score tough-guy points with business constituents who are driven to distraction by the thought of unions." Since that time, the right wing has gone all out to block her, now claiming that she is facing ethics issues. Earlier this week, the Heritage Foundation called her "The Next Tom Daschle," and the National Review wrote, "While everyone is looking at Tom Daschle's tax problems...a new issue has arisen concerning another Obama cabinet nomination, that of Rep. Hilda Solis to be Secretary of Labor." According to The Hill, Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY) "has questioned whether Solis had done lobbying work while she was both a House member and an official at a pro-labor group, American Rights at Work" (ARAW). There is no conflict-of-issue problem here. Solis wasn't paid for her activities with ARAW, and as the Washington Independent pointed out, her role was "well-known and ceremonial." As one official at a union noted, these excuses to hold up Solis are nothing more than a "clear proxy fight for Employee Free Choice."

RESTORING THE TRUST OF WORKERS: Obama has made clear that his Labor Department won't be anything like the one under Bush. "Remember, this is supposed to be the Department of Labor, not the Department of Management," he has stated. Elaine Chao -- Bush's Secretary of Labor who was confirmed in just 18 days -- made it through all eight years of the Bush administration, causing such a drop in morale at the Labor Department that staffers threw a "good-riddance party" to cheer her departure. She left behind a "deeply troubled department" that "spent eight years attacking workers' rights, strong workplace health and safety rules, and unions while they carried the water for Big Business." Chao, of course, was also a stalwart opponent of the Employee Free Choice Act. Under Solis, the Department of Labor will once again defend the rights of workers. As a state senator, Solis authored the first environmental justice law in the nation, and she has since said she is committed to creating green jobs. She also told the Senate that she would address the retirement security crisis; ensure that workplaces are safe, healthy, and fair; and protect workers from job discrimination.



AFGHANISTAN -- TOP MILITARY OFFICIAL SAYS 'WE DON'T HAVE' AN END GAME IN AFGHANISTAN: President Obama is finalizing a plan to send tens of thousands of more American troops to Afghanistan as "<a target="_blank" href="http://app.mx3.americanprogressaction.org/e/er.aspx?s=785&lid=15596&elq=0B7413F6E7A74C219E2C8576543670E3">part of a push to beat back the resurgent Taliban and secure regions of Afghanistan that are beyond the reach of the weak central government in Kabul." However, NBC military correspondent Jim Miklaszewski reports that according to military officials, during a meeting last week at the Pentagon with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, "the president specifically asked, 'What is the end game?' in the U.S. military's strategy for Afghanistan." "When asked what the answer was, one military official told NBC News, 'Frankly, we don't have one.' But they're working on it." The New York Times reported recently that even Obama's "military planners prepare for the first wave of the new Afghanistan 'surge,' there is growing debate, including among those who agree with the plan to send more troops, about whether -- or how -- the troops can accomplish their mission, and just what the mission is."

ENVIRONMENT -- SECRETARY CHU TELLS AMERICA TO 'WAKE UP' TO THE REALITIES OF CLIMATE CHANGE: In his first interview as Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu "offered some of the starkest comments yet on how seriously President Obama's cabinet views the threat of climate change." Chu told the Los Angeles Times that the nation is like "a family buying an old house and being told by an inspector that it must pay a hefty sum to rewire it or risk an electrical fire that could burn everything down." "I'm hoping that the American people will wake up," he continued. Chu also worried the nation doesn't yet recognize how great a threat global warming represents, saying, "I don't think the American public has gripped in its gut what could happen." One danger Chu highlighted in the interview was more frequent drought throughout the West, with major declines in the snowpack that waters California. In the worst case, Chu explained, "We're looking at a scenario where there's no more agriculture in California. I don't actually see how they can keep their cities going." Chu described "public education as a key part of the administration's strategy to fight global warming" -- in addition to clean energy research, infrastructure, a national renewable electricity standard, and a greenhouse gas cap-and-trade system. Perhaps proving his point that Americans have yet to "wake up," right-wing climate-change-denial bloggers retort that the Nobel Prize-winning quantum physicist and energy expert can't be believed because he "isn't a climate scientist."

JUSTICE -- U.S. THREATENS TO WITHHOLD INTELLIGENCE FROM BRITAIN IF EVIDENCE ON SUSPECTED TERROR SUSPECT IS RELEASED: Two senior judges in Great Britain yesterday accused the United States of attempting to cover-up evidence of the torture of former Guantanamo Bay detainee Binyam Mohamed. Mohamed, an Ethiopian national who resides in Britain, was arrested in 2002 because of his suspected ties to al-Qaeda. He alleges that, after his arrest, he was tortured by the Bush administration in a variety of ghost prisons, ending up at Guantanamo. But the detainee's descriptions of his torture were redacted. The British government claims that the U.S. "threatened" the British with "repercussions if details of the case were made public." "We did not consider that a democracy governed by the rule of law would expect a court in another democracy to suppress a summary of the evidence" of torture, the justices wrote in the opinion. The justices also called on President Obama to reconsider the U.S. position because it is "so important to the rule of law, free speech and democratic accountability." The ACLU on Wednesday sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, asking her to comment on the Obama administration's position on Mohamed as well as Obama's pledge to reject the Bush administration's claims of "national security to avoid judicial review of controversial programs."

Snuffysmith
The Action Americans Need washingtonpost.com — Americans expect action from Washington that matches the urgency they feel in their daily lives — action that's swift, bold and wise enough to help us climb out of this crisis. Because each day we wait to begin the work of turning our economy around our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse. That's why I feel such a sense of urgency about the recovery plan before Congress.

E.J.
Time to Play Hardball washingtonpost.com — The administration's visionary emphasis on winning expansive Republican support for the stimulus has been replaced by a down-to-earth struggle to get a bill through the Senate. Its hopes rest in part on a different form of bipartisanship.

DANIEL GROSS

Economic Know-Nothingism slate.com — Despite the congressional conservatives' nutso claim that government spending doesn't create jobs, Today, government accounts for 22.5 million of the nation's 135.5 million payroll jobs " including, by the way, their own.

DEAN BAKER
Buy America and the Knee-Jerk "Free Trade" Crowd tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com — After ignoring the growth of an $8 trillion housing bubble, fueled by junk loans issued by over-leveraged banks, the "free-trade" crew is worried that a "buy America" provision in the stimulus bill will give us a trade war leading to another Great Depression. This complaint should be put in perspective so we can all get a good laugh at their expense.

JULIA EISMAN
Obama to Kids: Yes You Can (Have Health Care) standupforhealthcare.org — With a stroke of a pen, President Obama granted health care for 4 million previously uninsured children by signing into law a reauthorization and expansion of the Children's Health Insurance Program. Now, these kids and those already enrolled in the program can see their doctor when they get sick — and not depend on the emergency room for basic care.
JIM YOUNGDAHL
Corporate America's Chicken Little Strategy seiu.org — Chicken Little was a one-trick chicken: "The sky is falling!" she would proclaim, in response to any situation, and to anyone who would listen. Well, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers have adapted Chicken's strategy.

ELANA SCHOR
The Senate Has Its Own Cap for CEOs tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com — Here's an important point about President Obama's new restrictions on executive pay: they're not retroactive. A bank that has already received bailout money would not need to abide by the limits unless it accepts more cash in the future. But Sen. Claire McCaskill's executive-pay cap bill is retroactive. And she's not giving up on it.

MARK TRUMBULL
Ending an Era Of Excess features.csmonitor.com — The financial sector has moved to the forefront of the long-simmering national debate over executive compensation, largely because it is receiving the greatest government assistance. But what happens in that industry could set trends that will affect others. The big question now may not be whether executive pay practices will change, but how.
Snuffysmith
ISAIAH J. POOLE
"We're Falling Without a Parachute" Three economists have laid out in stark terms what the stakes are for the economy in the economic recovery debate now going on in the Senate — and brought home just how dangerous conservative obstructionist rhetoric really is.

BILL SCHER
Obama Reminds Conservatives: Your Tax Cuts Lost Something tells me President Barack Obama has had it with the free ride that fact-challenged conservative obstructionists have been getting lately.

DAVID SIROTA
The "Make Him Do It" Dynamic In Action: Dems Pass Buy America Law Over McCain's Poison Pill Sen. John McCain's amendment to gut Buy America laws was soundly defeated in the U.S. Senate.

White House: Priority Is Legislation That "Doesn't Signal A Change In Our Overall Stance on Trade" Whether or not you are among the tiny minority of Americans who thinks our trade and globalization policies are good for our country, it is undeniable that Barack Obama campaigned on very explicit pledges to radically change those policies.

Green Jobs and "Buy America" Laws The Wall Street Journal explains why "Buy America" provisions and domestic preferences will likely be integral to making sure the green energy revolution actually happens in our country — and isn't outsourced:
Snuffysmith
MICHAEL MANDEL
Obama's PATCO Moment businessweek.com — The President has a chance to set a new direction on executive pay and Wall Street, just as Reagan did with organized labor.

UWE. E. REINHARDT
Supply, Demand and Executive Pay economix.blogs.nytimes.com — With very few exceptions, economists defend current executive compensation in the United States with an appeal to supply and demand. But whether or not compensation is fair depends on assumptions about an employee's contributions to the company.

SUSAN J. DOUGLAS
The Dragon We Must Slay inthesetimes.com — Government oversight and regulation aren't necessary evils; they are crucial to our political, economic and social survival. Period.

JOSH MARSHALL
Denial As Political Strategy talkingpointsmemo.com — This reality the national — and global — economic crisis was palpable in the political debate until as recently as a few weeks ago. But Republicans are using a strategy of conscious denial to push it off the stage. Because a successful stimulus bill would be devastating politically for their party. And they know it.

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS
The Failed Prophet inthesetimes.com — As Wall Street collapses, so does Milton Friedman's legacy.

SETH WESSLER
Our Shrinking Safety Net afro-netizen.com — A society cannot survive without a safety net and we don't have one during the worst economic crisis in decades.

ELIOT SPITZER
Can We Finally Kill Social Security Privatization? slate.com — "We told you so" is just about the most annoying sentence one can utter. But when it comes to the debate over Social Security, this is a moment for Democrats to say: We told you so

. WILL BUNCH
Tearing Down The Reagan 'Myth' npr.org — Ronald Reagan was a divisive president with only average approval ratings. His trickle-down theory of economics didn't save the American economy, nor was he responsible for "winning" the Cold War.

STEVE BENEN
It's Not 'Anti-Christian' washingtonmonthly.com — As if it weren't enough to endure painfully inane stimulus arguments from the far-right, we've had to deal with fabricated culture-war nonsense, too. Indeed, this story offers a classic case study in the spreading of a right-wing meme.
Snuffysmith
Obama Changes Tone, Goes on Offensive - Jonathan Martin, Politico
"I Won" Isn't Going to Close the Deal - Rich Lowry, New York Post
On the Edge of an Economic Abyss - Paul Krugman, New York Times
So Much For Hope Over Fear - Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post
With Friends Like These - Steven Stark, Boston Phoenix
GOP Stumbles Upon Seriousness of Purpose - Peggy Noonan, WSJ
Don't Be Silly: All Spending is Stimulus - Steven Pearlstein, Wash Post
Keynes Can't Help Us Now - Niall Ferguson, Los Angeles Times
Obama's New Map of the World - Thomas Barnett, Esquire
The Shape of Obama's Foreign Policy - Gideon Rachman, Financial Times
Biden Was Right About Obama Being Tested - Bill Kristol, Weekly Standard
Should There be Limits on Fertility? - Ellen Goodman, Miami Herald
What Is Robert Reich Talking About? - Ralph Reiland, American Spectator
How Amazon.com Is Thriving in a Dismal Economy - Farhad Manjoo, Slate
UofC Regents Tries Staving Off ‘Yellow Peril’ - Stephan Thernstrom, NRO
It Only Looks Like Blago Got Railroaded - Jonathan Rauch, National Jrnl
Democrats, Beware Michael Steele - Bob Beckel, RealClearPolitics
Snuffysmith
An Early Fork In The Road for Obama - Charlie Cook, National Journal
A Large Stimulus Bill for Large Problems - Scot Lehigh, Boston Globe
The Real Danger Is Doing Too Much - Clark Judge, US News & World Report
The Limits of the RNC - Jay Cost, HorseRaceBlog
Steele Is Not the GOP's Answer - Terence Samuel, The American Prospect
Conservatism Isn't Dead - It's Resting - David Frum, The New Majority
Freedom For Pakistan's Nuclear Proliferator - Omar Waraich, Time
Afghanistan Will Be a Quagmire for al Qaeda - Sen. Joe Lieberman, WSJ
Snuffysmith
Getting Tough in Washington - New York Times
The Worst Mortgage Idea Since Barney Frank's Last One - WSJ
Denying the Deniers - New York Daily News
Obama's Faith in Faith-based Works - Christian Science Monitor
Snuffysmith
Conservatives, Liberals, and Empiricism - Jonathan Chair, The Plank
Obama Diminishes Himself to Serve Pelosi - Paul Mirengoff, Powerline
CBO Report Really Says Stimulus Will Work - Ezra Klein, AP
Obey and "So What?" - Stephen Spruiell, The Corner
It's Stimulus Versus Saving the Environment - Michael Barone, TJ Street
Snuffysmith
Sunday February 8, 2009
Snuffysmith
ROBERT KUTTNER
Stimulus, Yes; Bank Bailout II, No
huffingtonpost.com — While the compromise bill has too many concessions to tax cutters in both parties, at least the administration has the basic concept about right. The bill is clearly not just meant as a one-shot, but a down payment on more adequate social outlay and 2st century infrastructure.

JOHN NICHOLS
Just the Beginning
thenation.com — Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has the whole executive accountability issue exactly right. Congress should "go further" and write stricter limits into law.

E.J. DIONNE
The Fighting Conciliator
washingtonpost.com — It took less than three weeks for the real Barack Obama to come into view. He turns out to be both a conciliator and a fighter.

BOB HERBERT
Playing With Fire
nytimes.com — The Republicans still don't get it. Most act as if they don't understand that in this radical economic downturn the demand for goods and services has fallen off a cliff, and that government spending is needed — and needed quickly — to replace a large portion of that lost demand.

STEVE BENEN
Why State Cuts Matter
washingtonmonthly.com — When a handful of Senate Republicans slashed over $100 billion from the economic stimulus package, they specifically targeted $40 billion in proposed aid to states. It's worth taking a moment to consider the consequences. States, facing the kind of crisis unseen in generations, are prohibited from running deficits, and are averse to raising taxes, so drastic shortfalls mean drastic cuts — which in turn make the effects of the recession worse.

SAMUEL JOHNSON

Geithner v. The American Oligarchs
tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com — There comes a time in every economic crisis when someone steps up to the podium to promise the policies that — they say — will deliver you back to growth. The person has political support, a strong track record, and every incentive to enter the history books. But one nagging question remains. Can this person really break with the vested elites that got you into this much trouble?

WILLIAM PFAFF

Public Policy and Private Wealth Hopelessly Tangled in Washington
truthdig.com — How do you find someone in Washington who knows what needs to be known about an issue who is not already financially tied to a solution?

TOM ENGELHARDT
The Graveyard v. The Empire
tomdispatch.com — Right now, Washington is whistling past the graveyard. In Afghanistan and Pakistan the question is no longer whether the U.S. is in command, but whether it can get out in time. If not, when the moment for a bailout comes, don't expect the other pressed powers of the planet to do for Washington what it has been willing to do for the John Thains of our world.
Snuffysmith
ECONOMY
Dueling Recovery Bills
Last week, the Senate took up the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, an economic stimulus package aimed at boosting the tanking economy. The legislation that emerged from the Senate debate, which is up for a procedural vote today, is substantively different from that which passed the House in January. The differences are due to an effort by a group of "centrist" senators -- the 'gang of moderates' -- to rein in what they characterized as unnecessary spending in the House version. Led by Sens. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Susan Collins (R-ME), the gang crafted a compromise that cut spending in the bill by about $100 billion, reducing the total cost to about $780 billion. However, that total does not factor in two new tax breaks that the Senate added -- one for new car purchases and another for home-buyers. With these tax breaks added in, the estimated cost stands at about $827 billion. As a result of the "compromise," though, the Senate bill is now inferior to the House's in terms of stimulative effect. More than two-thirds of the cuts are in areas that would provide the most effective stimulus. As the Center for American Progress' Michael Ettlinger wrote, "there are other smaller cuts in the remaining third that make little sense if the goal is, in fact, to weed out the least effective stimulus provisions."

THE DIFFERENCE IS JOBS: The unemployment rate is currently at 7.6 percent, after employers shed 598,000 jobs in a "brutal January." This number jumps to 13.9 percent when the underemployed -- those working part-time who want to be working full-time, or those who have simply given up on finding a job -- are factored in. Over the last three months, 1.8 million jobs have disappeared. As the Center for American Progress' Heather Boushey pointed out, "the United States has not seen job losses of this magnitude over a three month period since 1945." This highlights why job creation in the stimulus package is critical, yet the Senate bill would create between 430,000 and 538,000 fewer jobs than its House counterpart. Of course, as economist Brad Delong noted, "relative to the alternative of no bill we do boost employment in America a year from now by on the order of 3 million." But with potential job losses expected to continue "for another year nationwide" those jobs would mean a lot, and the stimulus should be aimed at those areas in which it can do the most good.

OUT -- STATE AID AND EDUCATION: Of the $83 billion cut by the Nelson-Collins gang, $40 billion of it was for state stabilization funding. This is incredibly important funding meant for "helping states and localities avoid wide-scale cuts in services and layoffs of public employees." There are 46 states facing budget shortfalls this year or next, and at least 41 states anticipate shortfalls for fiscal 2010 and beyond. Economist Mark Zandi calculated that every dollar invested in aid to the states has a return of $1.36. Also, this funding moves into the economy quickly, as "states that receive a check from the federal government will quickly pass on the money to workers, vendors, and program beneficiaries." A second area hard-hit by the gang's compromise is education (which the state funding would also have gone towards); the Senate bill "cuts all $16 billion from the original bill for K-12 school construction, [and] trims more than $1 billion from Head Start programs for youngsters." But as the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities pointed out, "thirty-four states have cut education or proposed such cuts because they face massive, devastating budget deficits in this recession." These cuts come in the form of per-pupil expenditure, school meal programs, and teacher layoffs. As one school board president said, "We are at that point where we have no other place to go (for cuts)." This money would have had immediate effects "in terms of forestalling layoffs and really preventing the symptoms of recession from exacerbating the economic woes that we're currently experiencing," CAP's Raegen Miller noted.

IN -- INEFFECTIVE TAX BREAKS: While state aid and education were cut, added into the bill in the Senate were tax breaks that will do little to jumpstart the economy. The Senate found just $18 billion in tax breaks it was willing to cut, but among these was a scaling back of the Child Tax Credit expansion proposed by the House. The House bill eliminates the income floor for the credit in 2009 and 2010, opening it up to the working poor who are most apt to spend it; the Senate set an income floor of $8,100. The Senate also included patching the Alternative Minimum Tax, which takes place every year and can hardly be called stimulative. Finally, the Senate included a $15,000 home-buyers credit, in an attempt to address the housing crisis. While it is undeniable that a fix for housing must be found, this tax credit is not it. It is not likely to incentivize anyone who was not going to purchase a home anyway, and as Dean Baker noted, the credit will "cost more than promised." Furthermore, it can go to any home-buyer, "the vast majority of whom will be people who already own a home. If a person buys a home, but sells their current home, it has no net effect on the market." In the end, it will amount to little more than a "house-flipping subsidy."



MEDIA -- GOP EMBRACES RUSH LIMBAUGH AS ITS 'UNOFFICIAL LEADER': The Los Angeles Times wrote yesterday that "Rush Limbaugh has his grip on the GOP microphone," having become "<a target="_blank" href="http://app.mx3.americanprogressaction.org/e/er.aspx?s=785&lid=15739&elq=D4EFE44ACBDC4839800E7BAB0CD14C14">the politically wounded party's unofficial leader." Limbaugh -- who said he hopes that Barack Obama will fail -- has seen his "prominence and political import" increased. One example of Limbaugh's influence, unmentioned in the article, is the fact that he coined the messaging strategy for stimulus opponents, referring to the economic recovery package as "porkulus." On his Jan. 23 radio show, Limbaugh said that "it's not a stimulus, it's a porkulus." On his Jan. 28 show, Limbaugh introduced the term to Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), saying "You could call this the 'porkulus.'" "Right. ... It is porkulus. That's a great description," Cantor replied. Limbaugh cynically wrote in the Wall Street Journal last month, "This 'porkulus' bill is designed to repair the Democratic Party's power losses from the 1990s forward, and to cement the party's majority power for decades." Eventually, Limbaugh's phrase trickled down to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who has also embraced the term. Bloomberg's Hans Nichols wrote recently, "Every superhero needs an archenemy. President Barack Obama has yet to find one." Rush Limbaugh seems eager to acquire that role.

TERRORISM -- RIGHT-WING SENATORS FAIL TO NOTICE 50-DAY HUNGER STRIKE AT GITMO: Recently, Sens. James Inhofe (R-OK), David Vitter (R-LA), and other Senate Republicans went on a fact-finding mission to Guantanamo Bay to rally opposition to President Obama's executive order closing the detention facility within one year. Upon returning, Inhofe praised the conditions of the prison, saying it is "the only complex in the world that can safely and humanely hold these individuals." Vitter agreed, telling right-wing radio host Laura Ingraham last week, "There is no abuse issue. There is no torture issue." He even claimed there were "specific cases that prove" that detainees would prefer to stay at Guantanamo than return to their home countries. But according to a Guantanamo military lawyer, detainees are still being "beaten" and are living in horrific conditions. Yesterday, the Guardian reported that Lt. Col. Yvonne Bradley is demanding the release of her client, who is "dying" because of his treatment. "Fifty of its 260 detainees are on hunger strike and, say witnesses, are being strapped to chairs and force-fed, with those who resist being beaten. At least 20 are described as being so unhealthy they are on a 'critical list', according to Bradley." None of the senators, however, reported on these disturbing -- and worsening -- conditions. In fact, Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) praised the facility for being "in keeping with our Nation's highest ideals," adding, "If anyone receives mistreatment at Guantanamo, it is the guard force."

ADMINISTRATION -- FEMA DENIES ASSISTANCE TO 650,000 HURRICANE IKE VICTIMS: Victims of Hurricane Ike, which hit southeastern Texas in September 2008, have had a hard time receiving assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Roughly 650,000 applicants have been denied any assistance so far. Lawyers for many of the people found ineligible are saying that "unqualified or poorly trained FEMA inspectors" are to be blamed for FEMA's failure to help the region. According to Mark J. Grandich, who represents a homeowner whose request for aid had been denied, FEMA merely "hired a bunch of people, basically just anybody, and put them on the street after one day of training." The 2,360 inspectors hired by FEMA appeared to have been "motivated to work quickly because they are paid a flat fee per inspection and must cover most of their own expenses." One former FEMA inspector said that the agency's training program is "a scam" and that FEMA's "goal is to get as many inspections as they can done every day to keep their heads above water." FEMA argues that many people "do not understand the limits of the agency's help" and that the agency attempts to make only the most uninhabitable homes "safe, secure and functional."

Snuffysmith
<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 20px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">1. 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You</h3> By Claire Suddath A list of 25 things I wish people hadn't shared with me on Facebook

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">2. A 10-Year-Old Divorcée Takes Paris</h3> By Vivienne Walt / Paris A Yemeni girl's request to split with her husband leads to a change in the law — and global accolades and interest

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">3. What Is Real Stimulus and What Isn't?</h3> By Michael Grunwald There are valid criticisms of the economic stimulus plans, but much of the proposed package will both create jobs and serve long-term goals

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">4. How to Save Your Newspaper</h3> By Walter Isaacson It's now or never for America's dailies. A former TIME managing editor offers a way to return journalism to prosperity: charge for it, a nickel at a time

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">5. Are We Bringing Our Germs to Mars?</h3> By Bryan Walsh A NASA scientist suggests we need a stronger policy controlling potential contamination created by space exploration

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">6. Auto-Tune: Why Pop Music Sounds Perfect</h3> By Josh Tyrangiel Why do pop vocals suddenly sound perfect--or intentionally imperfect?

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">7. Ron Jeremy: My Life as a Porn Star</h3> By Andrea Sachs A star of XXX-rated movies talks about life and achieving liftoff

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">8. Christians and Atheists Battle in London Bus Wars</h3> By William Lee Adams / London Believers and non-believers take their advertising campaigns onto British public transport in a bid to woo public

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">9. The Octuplet Mom Speaks, and the Questions Grow</h3> By Alison Stateman / Los Angeles In spite of guidelines, the medical establishment can do little when a patient insists on implanting multiple embryos. Should that be changed?

<h3 style="padding: 0pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt;">10. The Best and Worst Super Bowl Commercials 2009</h3> Which commercials scored touchdowns and which fumbled? TIME TV critic James Poniewozik grades the players

Snuffysmith
1. 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
By Claire Suddath A list of 25 things I wish people hadn't shared with me on Facebook

2. A 10-Year-Old Divorcée Takes Paris
By Vivienne Walt / Paris A Yemeni girl's request to split with her husband leads to a change in the law — and global accolades and interest

3. What Is Real Stimulus and What Isn't?
By Michael Grunwald There are valid criticisms of the economic stimulus plans, but much of the proposed package will both create jobs and serve long-term goals

4. How to Save Your Newspaper
By Walter Isaacson It's now or never for America's dailies. A former TIME managing editor offers a way to return journalism to prosperity: charge for it, a nickel at a time

5. Are We Bringing Our Germs to Mars?
By Bryan Walsh A NASA scientist suggests we need a stronger policy controlling potential contamination created by space exploration

6. Auto-Tune: Why Pop Music Sounds Perfect
By Josh Tyrangiel Why do pop vocals suddenly sound perfect--or intentionally imperfect?
. Ron Jeremy: My Life as a Porn Sta
By Andrea Sachs A star of XXX-rated movies talks about life and achieving liftoff

8. Christians and Atheists Battle in London Bus Wars
By William Lee Adams / London Believers and non-believers take their advertising campaigns onto British public transport in a bid to woo public

9. The Octuplet Mom Speaks, and the Questions Grow
By Alison Stateman / Los Angeles In spite of guidelines, the medical establishment can do little when a patient insists on implanting multiple embryos. Should that be changed?

10. The Best and Worst Super Bowl Commercials 2009
Which commercials scored touchdowns and which fumbled? TIME TV critic James Poniewozik grades the players
Snuffysmith
ECONOMY
The Establishment Vs. The Public
While Congress debates the economic recovery package this week, President Obama is touring areas of the country hardest hit by the economic meltdown. Yesterday, Obama spoke in Elkart, IN, a town with a 15 percent unemployment rate, the nation's fastest-rising. Obama will be traveling to Ft. Myers, FL today, which is plagued by a 10 percent unemployment and America's highest foreclosure rate. On Thursday, he will visit Peoria, IL, where Caterpillar has 22,000 job cuts. In the meantime, the debate in Washington has somewhat turned against Obama's recovery package. House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) argued that congressional conservatives are "standing up on principle and just saying no" to the recovery bill. The national media have been blindly following right wing talking points, baselessly lambasting Obama's recovery legislation as excessive spending. "A lot of America’s high-powered political journalists seem, at least as evidenced by the questions they ask, to have a very poor grasp of macroeconomic issues," observed Center for American Progress Fellow Matthew Yglesias yesterday.

PUBLIC WANTS A REAL RECOVERY: The national media has proclaimed that Obama is "losing [the] stimulus message war." But the perception across the country could not be more different. As a Gallup poll released yesterday noted, "The American public gives President Barack Obama a strong 67% approval rating for the way in which he is handling the government's efforts to pass an economic stimulus bill." Despite conservatives' vocal opposition to the recovery bill, 52 percent favor a roughly $800 billion package, while 38 percent are opposed. Independent voters favor the progressive priorities set forth by Obama: 50 percent independents favor "increased government funding of projects" in the recovery package, compared to only 36 percent who favor "tax cuts for individuals/businesses" promulgated by conservatives. Congressional Republicans, who see political gain from their "party of no" status, have a "staggeringly high" disapproval of 58 percent. Their approval rating is at 44 percent compared to 60 percent for Democrats.

PUSHING THE CONSERVATIVE AGENDA: The media debate over the economic recovery has been reduced to one that is hostile to government spending and increasingly receptive to the conservative "tax-cut-only" line. Yesterday, for example, after Obama's press conference, CBS's Bob Scheiffer told Katie Couric, "He's got to somehow keep [Democrats] from loading up this bill with more spending -- so much spending." "As you know, there's a lot of people in the public, a lot of members of Congress who think this is pork-stuffed and that it really doesn't stimulate. A lot of people have said it's a spending bill and not a stimulus," remarked ABC's Charles Gibson last week. "I'm confused as to why we're being tricked into thinking this is a stimulus bill, when it’s packed with welfare programs," said MSNBC's Mika Brzenzski. The list goes on. The Progress Report has conducted two analyses of the debate showing that cable news is helping advance the right wing's message. During the Senate debate, between Feb. 2 and Feb. 5, Republican lawmakers outnumbered Democratic lawmakers 75 to 41 in interviews. During the House debate the week earlier, cable outlets hosted a 2 to 1 ratio of GOP to Democratic lawmakers.

RESTORING CONFIDENCE.: Examining "districts that tend to be swing or conservative districts," Rep. Chris Van Hollen's (D-MD) office determined that 92 percent of the local stories portrayed the recovery package in a positive light, "touting the benefits the spending would bring to struggling local economies. Of newspaper stories, 91 percent were positive; TV, 96 percent; and radio, 85 percent." As senior Obama advisor David Axelrod observed, "The American people support [the recovery], and we're urging everyone in Congress to catch up with the people on this one." "I think there's a myopic viewpoint in Washington. And I think Washington needs to understand what happens in Florida, and Indiana, and Michigan, and Ohio, and Pennsylvania -- states that have seen huge in[creases in] unemployment," added Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. Obama's tour of the country seems to be having some benefit in returning public hope. Prior to his visit, the local newspaper -- The Elkhart Truth -- wrote, "We are weak. We are tired. We are frustrated, and sometimes the burdens of our struggles cause us to stop and cry." One day later, the same paper wrote that Obama's visit "brought back some confidence to a community struggling with high unemployment."



ADMINISTRATION -- OBAMA'S UNSCREENED TOWN HALL AUDIENCE IS CLEAN BREAK FROM BUSH'S SUPPORTERS-ONLY EVENTS: Yesterday, President Obama hosted a town hall meeting in Elkhart, IN to promote his recovery and reinvestment plan. As the Washington Post's Dan Froomkin pointed out, Obama traveled to relatively unfriendly territory, since Obama lost the county to Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) in the presidential election <a target="_blank" href="http://app.mx3.americanprogressaction.org/e/er.aspx?s=785&lid=15813&elq=7FF8A6B9C9714FD19C79ACBA0D773AE3">44 percent to 56 percent. Despite this fact, the White House did not screen its audience, which had the chance to ask the president questions. "In a dramatic contrast to former President Bush's town-hall meetings -- which were held almost exclusively in party strongholds, with tickets distributed primarily to supporters -- it was first come, first served in Elkhart" when tickets were distributed," noted the Washington Post. Former President Bush aggressively screened his audience members, even requiring volunteer service or loyalty oaths before being allowed to attend his events. For instance, in March 2005, people seeking tickets to a Social Security event were quizzed about their support of Bush and his Social Security plan ahead of time. At the town hall yesterday, Obama underscored the openness of his events, saying: "Here's the deal on questions: First of all, we didn't screen anybody, so there's some people who like me in the audience, some people that don't, some people agree with me, some people who don't. It doesn't matter. We want to take questions from everybody."

JUSTICE -- LEAHY URGES TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION TO INVESTIGATE BUSH: At his first official press conference last night, President Obama got a question from Huffington Post's Sam Stein about Sen. Patrick Leahy's (D-VT) proposed "truth commission" to investigate "misdeeds" committed by the Bush administration. Obama said, "My view is also that nobody's above the law and, if there are clear instances of wrongdoing, that people should be prosecuted just like any ordinary citizen. But that, generally speaking, I'm more interested in looking forward than I am in looking backwards." Leahy first advocated such a commission while speaking yesterday at a Georgetown University forum, proposing a group of people who don't have an "axe to grind," to probe offenses committed by the Bush administration, including torture and warrantless wiretapping. The commission would be authorized by the Senate and would have subpoena powers and the ability to obtain immunity from prosecutors. "We need to be able to read the page before we turn the page," Leahy said,. He also praised Attorney General Eric Holder for not partaking in a "devil's bargain" with conservative senators, who had wanted a promise from him that he would not investigate Bush officials, in exchange for votes during his confirmation hearing. Leahy's proposal yesterday echoes calls by Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's (D-RI) to investigate various Bush administration crimes. Regardless of Obama's actions on the issue, Whitehouse said, Congress "has an independent responsibility" to pursue a criminal investigation.

TORTURE -- OBAMA DOJ AFFIRMS BUSH'S STATE SECRETS POSITION ON RENDITION CASE: In federal court yesterday, the Obama administration signaled it would uphold the Bush administration's state secrets position in a lawsuit regarding an airline's complicity in Bush's use of extraordinary rendition. Five men who say they were victims of extraordinary rendition -- including current Guantanamo detainee and torture victim Binyam Mohamed -- sued, but the case was thrown out last year after Bush declared it to be a matter of state secrets. In the appeal yesterday, the new administration took the same position. ABC News reported that the Obama administration "stands behind arguments that previous administration made, with no ambiguity at all. The Justice Department lawyer said the entire subject matter remains a state secret." Mohamed was also at the center of a recent case in the U.K. in which two High Court judges ruled against releasing documents -- reportedly at the request of the British government -- that described his harsh treatment while held by Americans and their allies. The London Daily Telegraph reported last weekend that, according to a British intelligence official, the documents reveal that "Mohamed's genitals were sliced with a scalpel and other torture methods so extreme that waterboarding, the controversial technique of simulated drowning, 'is very far down the list of things they did.'"

Snuffysmith
The President Paints a Bleak Economic Picture - Josh Gerstein, Politico
Obama's Bipartisanship Means Agreeing with Him - David Keene, The Hill
Now is No Time for Compromise - Eugene Robinson, Washington Post
Public is Growing More Skeptical of Content in Bill - William McGurn, WSJ
Obama's Unimpressive News Conference - Walter Shapiro, New Republic
Up Next for Bankers: A Flogging - Andrew Ross Sorkin, New York Times
Congress Misreads Public Anger at Wall Street - Caroline Baum, Bloomberg
The Critical State of the Economy - Jeffrey Sachs, Huffington Post
Stimulus: A History of Folly - James Glassman, Commentary
Random Thoughts on the Passing Scene - Thomas Sowell, RealClearPolitics
Is Zimbabwe Now a Rogue State? - Christopher Hitchens, Slate
Only Obama Offers Change for Israel - Gideon Rachman, Financial Times
'We Love To Talk,' Declares Biden - Mona Charen, National Review
The Cost of Criticizing Jihadists - Nat Hentoff, Cato Institute
The Rise of Extremism in London - HDS Greenway, Boston Globe
New Law on Toys is Nightmare for Small Business - Sen. Jim DeMint, RCP
A Race Against Time in Afghanistan - Sen. John Kerry, Washington Post
Snuffysmith
A Prime-Time Plea - San Francisco Chronicle
Health Care Debate Should Be Separate from Stimulus - Chicago Tribune
Curb America's Debt Culture - Christian Science Monitor
Buy American, Buy Depression - Investor's Business Daily
Snuffysmith
Obama's Conflicted Economic Language - Tim Kaine, Growthology
Geithner v. Axelrod - Matthew Yglesias, Think Progress
Obama's First Prime-Time Presser - Joel Achenbach, Achenblog
Who Said Anything About Change? - Jennifer Rubin, Contentions
The President on the Role of Government - Charles Lemos, MyDD
Snuffysmith
POLITICS
The Gingrich-ization Of Conservatives
From the presidential campaign to his election and inauguration, President Obama often pledged to reach out to Republicans in an effort to change the bitter partisan tone in Washington. "The monopoly on good ideas does not belong to a single party," Obama said last month. "If it's a good idea, we will consider it." Indeed, in the run-up to the passage last week of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Obama acted in good faith by preemptively including Republican-favored tax cuts in the original House version of the bill, meeting personally with House and Senate Republicans, and stripping stimulative spending initiatives because of GOP complaints. But conservatives ended up taking their cues from hate radio host Rush Limbaugh, who declared early on that he hoped Obama fails in his effort to rebuild the economy. As a result, Obama received support from just three Senate Republicans, while zero House Republicans voted for the bill, with many participating in a campaign to perpetuate myths and falsehoods about the plan's specifics before the final vote. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), one of the three Republicans who voted for the package, said bluntly that the GOP risks becoming "the party of Hoover" because of its near complete rejection of the stimulus. But while Limbaugh is leading the rhetorical battle, conservatives appear to be looking for political strategy from former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

LEADER GINGRICH: The GOP has been scrambling to pick up the pieces after two devastating elections, in which they lost control of the House, Senate and the White House, and Gingrich is seizing upon the leadership vacuum. Last September, Gingrich "was whipping against" President Bush's TARP plan "up until the last minute" and was reportedly in part responsible for the GOP voting against it. As House Speaker from 1995 to 1999, Gingrich whipped his colleagues into opposing most of President Clinton's policy agenda, most famously health care reform. Now he is advising the GOP leadership to follow the same path with Obama's agenda. The New York Times reported this weekend that House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) "had studied Mr. Gingrich's years in power and had been in regular touch with him as he sought to help his party find the right tone and message." "I talk to Newt on a regular basis," Cantor said.

SMART STRATEGY?: Yesterday on MSNBC, host Chris Matthews noted that "the Republicans plan to say, 'I told you,'" if Obama's recovery plan fails. He asked, "So how smart is it for the Grand Old Party to place all its chips on the grand defeat of the American economy?" Also, how smart is it to follow Gingrich's lead? Conventional wisdom suggests Gingrich's obstruction tactics in the early 1990s were a success, but as Center for American Progress Action Fund Fellow Matt Yglesias pointed out, "those tactics included lockstep opposition to a Clinton economic program" that "laid the groundwork for years of prosperity." Obstructing Clinton's health care reform initiatives in the '90s have been costly. Nearly 10 million more Americans have joined the rolls of the uninsured and health care costs "surpassed $2 trillion in 2006, almost three times the $714 billion spent in 1990." Gingrich's credibility on major issues is also in question. In 1993, he warned that Clinton's budget proposals "will lead to a recession next year. This is the Democrat machine's recession, and each one of them will be held personally accountable." Moreover, the American public became disgruntled with Gingrich's political tactics, especially during the budget standoff that led to the government shutdowns of 1995-96. Newsday reported on Nov. 11, 1995, that a "USA Today/CNN poll released yesterday suggested Americans by wide margins have soured on the Republican agenda, with 60 percent saying he [Clinton] should veto the budget bill and 33 percent saying he should sign it." And on the first day of the government shutdown, a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll found that 36 percent favored the GOP position while 49 percent favored the Democratic position.

A BLEAK FUTURE: Newly-elected Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said recently that he hopes to return to "the principles" of the Gingrich era. "We had a contract with America, 1994, with the American people and the party bound together in agreement that these would be some 10 principles that we would follow. We moved away from that...the principles that we espoused then are still true and good today," he said. The GOP also plans to bring back elements of the old K Street Project, a pay-to-play machine set up by former representative Tom DeLay where lobbyists were given influence over legislation in exchange for contributions to Republicans and refusal to hire Democrats. And like the days of Gingrich, the GOP is also beginning a campaign to obstruct Obama's health care reform agenda. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) announced the creation of a task force that will devise "free-market solutions" to health care and highlight the "consequences" of a "government-dominated health care bureaucracy." The panel is also stacked with lawmakers cozy with the health care industry. But it seems that the GOP's move toward Gingrich and the far right is already having consequences. The New York Times reports today that the GOP's charge against Obama's recovery package has led to a "disconnect" between Republicans in Congress and GOP governors, some of whom openly and avidly support Obama's plan. "It really is a matter of perspective," Florida Gov. Charlie Crist ® said. "As a governor, the pragmatism that you have to exercise because of the constitutional obligation to balance your budget is a very compelling pull."



ENVIRONMENT -- GEORGE WILL MAKES UP FACTS IN HIS COLUMN DENYING GLOBAL WARMING: In the Washington Post yesterday, conservative columnist George Will chastised Energy Secretary Stephen Chu for "<a target="_blank" href="http://app.mx3.americanprogressaction.org/e/er.aspx?s=785&lid=16102&elq=9632FE637B954E25852A2FA5A048A30E">doomsaying" about global warming, arguing that concerns about climate change are just "eco-pessimism." As evidence to support his point, Will claimed that "according to the University of Illinois' Arctic Climate Research Center, global sea ice levels now equal those of 1979." But as TPMMuckraker notes, the Arctic Climate Research Center (ACRC) quickly disputed Will's claim. "We do not know where George Will is getting his information," wrote the organization on its website "but our data shows that on February 15, 1979, global sea ice area was 16.79 million sq. km and on February 15, 2009, global sea ice area was 15.45 million sq. km. Therefore, global sea ice levels are 1.34 million sq. km less in February 2009 than in February 1979." In its statement, the ACRC added, "It is disturbing that the Washington Post would publish such information without first checking the facts." Washington Post editorial page editor Fred Hiatt told TPMMuckraker that "he'd try to respond to questions about the editing process later today." The site has yet to hear back from him. Noting other factual problems with Will's column, The American Prospect's Ezra Klein slammed Will, writing that "sadly, our political pundits have outsourced their scientific research to an intern charged with a superficial skim of Newsweek covers." He added, "I look forward to [Will's] correction."

JUSTICE -- DOJ REPORT SHARPLY CRITICIZES BUSH ADMINISTRATION'S LEGAL REASONING BEHIND TORTURE: A soon to be completed internal Justice Department report condemns the legal reasoning offered by Bush administration lawyers to justify waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics. The report is the culmination of over a year of research led by H. Marshall Jarrett of the DOJ's watchdog unit, the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), aiming to determine if the Bush team's legal advice permitting unprecedented interrogation methods "was consistent with the professional standards that apply to Department of Justice attorneys." It focuses primarily on the legal memos authorizing torture written by three top Bush officials: Jay Bybee, John Yoo, and Steven Bradbury. A draft of the report submitted in the final weeks of the Bush administration prompted the sharp criticism of then-attorney general Michael Mukasey. "OPR is not competent to judge [the opinions by Justice attorneys]," he said. "They're not constitutional scholars." Attorney General Eric Holder will have to decide whether or not to approve the findings and make the report public. But Holder's expected response to this report remains unclear. During his confirmation hearing, he explicitly stated that waterboarding is torture, but he has declined to say whether he will pursue charges against Bush officials who authorized the the technique.

EDUCATION -- BRISTOL PALIN SAYS ABSTINENCE 'IS NOT REALISTIC AT ALL': In 2006, as an Alaska gubernatorial candidate, Sarah Palin filled out a questionnaire emphasizing her support for abstinence education. She wrote that "the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support." Palin's hard-right views came under fire when it was revealed that her then-17-year-old daughter Bristol was pregnant. In her first public interview, Bristol told Fox News's chief Palin cheerleader Greta Van Susteren last night that abstinence is "not realistic at all." "I think abstinence is, like -- like, the -- I don't know how to put it -- like, the main -- everyone should be abstinent or whatever, but it’s not realistic at all," Bristol said. When Van Susteren asked Gov. Palin about abstinence later, she seemed similarly dismissive of her former views, admitting, "It sounds naive." Bristol added, "I just -- I hope that people learn from my story and just, like, I don't know, prevent teen pregnancy, I guess." Despite its record of failure, conservatives continue to beat the drum for abstinence-only education. Last week, Republicans were angry that "essential" abstinence education funding had been "eliminated" from President Obama's recovery and reinvestment bill. A Republican report on the bill expressed its concern "that while abstinence education receives only $176 million annually...contraceptives and family planning already receive $1.6 billion of federal funding."

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.