QUOTE(Livyjr @ Dec 13 2006, 06:52 AM)

"Maybe we military men were all weak."
"Maybe we should have stood up and pounded the table."
".... I was part of it (ABDICATING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE TROOPS DURING THE VIET NAM WAR) and I'm sort of ashamed of myself, too."
"AT TIMES I WONDER, 'WHY DID I GO ALONG WITH THIS KIND OF STUFF?'"
- Adm. David Lamar McDonald, 1976 (Chief of Navy in 1965)
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Dec 26 2006, 06:53 PM)

THE PRESIDENT (Lyndon Baines Johnson) REMAINED DETERMINED TO DEEPEN AMERICAN INVOLVEMENT IN VIETNAM WITHOUT A CONGRESSIONAL DEBATE (April-June 1965).
EVEN AS HE CIRCUMVENTED THE CONSTITUTION, LBJ ABDICATED LEADERSHIP IN CONNECTION WITH VIETNAM.
- Page 294, Dereliction of Duty - Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, The Joint Chiefs of Staff, AND THE LIES THAT LED TO VIET NAM by H.R. McMaster .....
(U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert) McNamara's trip to Saigon (July 1965) raised the level of congressional interest in Vietnam.
While (U.S. Army General and Chairman of the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff Earle) Wheeler was away with McNamara, the other chiefs met with members of the House Armed Services Committee in Chairman L. Mendel River's office.
The representatives wanted the JCS to provide them with a comprehensive estimate of the amount of force that the war would ultimately require.
IF THE CHIEFS ANSWERED THE QUESTIONS DIRECTLY AND HONESTLY, THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO FOIL THE PRESIDENT'S PLANS FOR "SOFTENING UP" THE PUBLIC AND THE CONGRESS UPON MCNAMARA'S RETURN FROM SAIGON.
"COACH" JOHNSON (President Lyndon Baines Johnson) WOULD HAVE BEEN PROUD OF HIS "TEAM" (the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States military, to include the Commandant of the United States Marine Corps).When the representatives asked if mobilization was necessary, the officers avoided answering.
ALTHOUGH HAROLD JOHNSON (United States Army Chief) HAD ALREADY NOTIFIED MAJOR ARMY COMMANDERS TO PREPARE FOR A ONE-YEAR MOBILIZATION OF RESERVE UNITS AND HAD OUTLINED TO THEM A SPECIFIC PROGRAM FOR INCREASING THE STRENGTH OF THE ARMY BY SIXTY-THREE BATTALIONS, THE ARMY CHIEF TOLD THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS THAT HE "DIDN'T REALLY KNOW" WHAT HIS REQUIREMENT WAS "NOW OR IN THE FUTURE."
After repeated questioning Johnson replied that some 250,000 U.S. troops would be needed in Vietnam - ABOUT HALF THE NUMBER HE PRIVATELY BELIEVED WOULD BE NECESSARY TO END THE WAR ON TERMS FAVORABLE TO THE UNITED STATES AND SOUTH VIETNAM.
McConnell refused to estimate the number of men the Air Force would require to satisfy the demands of the war.
McDonald said that the Navy would require 40,000 more sailors, but did not state whether the increase would require mobilization of reserve forces.
ALTHOUGH (United States Marine Corps Commandant) GREENE BELIEVED THAT THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS MUST HAVE DEDUCED FROM THE DISCUSSION THE NEED FOR MOBILIZATION, THE CHIEFS NEVER MADE THAT REQUIREMENT EXPLICIT.
Near the end of the meeting, one of the legislators asked Greene directly how many men would be needed to win the war in Vietnam.
Amid the confusing and contradictory estimates of his colleagues, however, Greene's estimate of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND made no visible impression on the legislators.
- Pages 309,310,
Dereliction of Duty - Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, The Joint Chiefs of Staff, AND THE LIES THAT LED TO VIET NAM by H.R. McMaster ......