Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: attacks begin
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Civil Rights and Civil Liberties > Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Archive
Stonewallsteve
Rove: Bush To Push Gay Marriage Amendment
by Paul Johnson 365Gay.com Washington Bureau Chief

Posted: November 8, 2004 12:01 am ET



(Washington) President Bush's senior political adviser said Sunday that an amendment to the US Constitution to ban same-sex marriage is high on the Presidents agenda for the first year of his new mandate.

But, Karl Rove, who delivered the evangelical vote to Bush and who orchestrated the use of gay marriage as a campaign tool for Republicans in the election, also seemed to hold out a small olive branch.

Rove said that Bush wants states to look at options for giving some limited recognition to same-sex couples.

Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Rove said that states should decide whether to give gay couples insurance benefits, inheritance and visitation rights in hospitals.

The option, however, would provide none of the federal benefits of marriage to gay and lesbian couples, and civil unions could be nullified by the proposed federal amendment to the Constitution.

Human Rights Campaign President Cheryl Jacques said Sunday that the proposed amendment, as written would ban civil unions.

"President Bush should unite Americans, not try to enact a discriminatory constitutional amendment that goes beyond marriage to ban hospital visitation rights for same-sex couples," said Jacques.

Rove also said that Bush is determined that "activist judges" don't redefine marriage.

"Without the protection of that amendment, we are at the mercy of activist federal judges or activist state judges who could, without the involvement of the people, determine ... that marriage no longer consists of a union between a man and a woman," Rove told Fox News.

"Marriage is a very important part of our culture and our society. If we want to have a hopeful and decent society, we ought to aim for the ideal. And the ideal is that marriage ought to be and should be a union of a man and a woman," he continued.

In his victory speech Bush called Rove "the architect" of his campaign. Admirers describe Rove as shrewd and ingenious, familiar with the political climate down to the county level, skilled at knowing where to find untapped Republican voters. Critics call him devious and willing to use smear tactics or distortion.

Rove's comments about states and same-sex benefits appear to mirror remarks made by Bush in the days leading up to the election.

Bush told ABC's Charles Gibson that he would support civil unions but remains opposed to gay marriage. (story)

"I view the definition of marriage difference from legal arrangements that enable people to have rights," he told ABC. "And I strongly believe that marriage ought to be defined as between, a union between a man and a woman," Bush said. "Now, having said that, states ought to be able to have the right to pass … laws that enable people to you know, be able to have rights, like others."

The remarks angered many evangelicals, but, with Rove's backing could put Democrats and moderate Republicans in Congress in a squeeze if they continue to block the federal amendment.

With the presidential election over, Rover is now looking at 2006 Congressional election.

©365Gay.com 2004
purduejake
"President Bush's senior political adviser said Sunday that an amendment to the US Constitution to ban same-sex marriage is high on the Presidents agenda for the first year of his new mandate."

Ugh, I am amazed how fast they are working to piss everybody off. First the queers, then the women, then who?
QUOTE
"Rove said that Bush wants states to look at options for giving some limited recognition to same-sex couples."

HAHA, riiiight. Put it in the f*cking amendment if that's what you want, reeper.

QUOTE
Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Rove said that states should decide whether to give gay couples insurance benefits, inheritance and visitation rights in hospitals.


Does anybody else see a problem with picking and choosing which rights people will get? It's sick.

QUOTE
Rove also said that Bush is determined that "activist judges" don't redefine marriage.


Since when did upholding the Constitution become an activist act? Oh, since Bush came into office... silly me.

QUOTE
"Without the protection of that amendment, we are at the mercy of activist federal judges or activist state judges who could, without the involvement of the people, determine ... that marriage no longer consists of a union between a man and a woman," Rove told Fox News.


At the mercy of them? How in the hell are they threatening YOU?!?

QUOTE
"Marriage is a very important part of our culture and our society. If we want to have a hopeful and decent society, we ought to aim for the ideal. And the ideal is that marriage ought to be and should be a union of a man and a woman," he continued.


And ideally everybody would be white, rich, and straight. I wonder how in the hell is is planning to to work for an ideal society. We all know the poor are being slaughtered in Iraq. I wonder how long before we start lopping off heads here at home.
QUOTE
Rove's comments about states and same-sex benefits appear to mirror remarks made by Bush in the days leading up to the election.


Flip-flop?

QUOTE
Bush told ABC's Charles Gibson that he would support civil unions but remains opposed to gay marriage.


Then put it in your f'ing amendment and give them all the rights everybody else has.
QUOTE
"I view the definition of marriage difference from legal arrangements that enable people to have rights," he told ABC. "And I strongly believe that marriage ought to be defined as between, a union between a man and a woman," Bush said. "Now, having said that, states ought to be able to have the right to pass … laws that enable people to you know, be able to have rights, like others."


Yea, like the African Americans who supposedly have the right to vote in OH and FL.
QUOTE
The remarks angered many evangelicals, but, with Rove's backing could put Democrats and moderate Republicans in Congress in a squeeze if they continue to block the federal amendment.


Evangelicals = perverted God

QUOTE
With the presidential election over, Rover is now looking at 2006 Congressional election.


Hah, well Bunny Pants hasn't been inaugurated yet, Rove.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.