Maoist Threat Molds Nepalese Reaction to King's Takeover
http://enews.voanews.com/t?ctl=B7F338:2F72C9DLast week, Nepal's King Gyanendra sacked government and ordered
crackdown against political rivals - putting politicians and activists
under house arrest and censoring the media
Soldiers keep vigil on a street in KatmanduLast week, Nepal's King
Gyanendra sacked the government and ordered a crackdown against his
political rivals - putting politicians and activists under house
arrest and censoring the media. Rights activists call the moves a
coup, but the king says he acted to end months of government stalemate
and to fight a Maoist insurgency in the countryside.
Teachers at the Bal Mandir school in the town of Dulekhel consider the
area safe from the threat of Nepal's Maoist insurgency. But one
teacher, Dhruba Prasad Chaulagain, had to flee his home village - just
60 kilometers away - when his life was threatened by the guerrillas.
Mr. Chaulagain says he believes in democracy and has full faith in it,
but if you do not agree with what the Maoists say, they threaten to
torture you, kill you or beat you.
Dulekhel countryside; VOA photo - P. NunanMr. Chaulagain's
experience is unusual in Dulekhel, a small town 32 kilometers from
Nepal's capital Kathmandu. Most here say they have not come into
contact with the Maoists - a guerrilla organization that occupies
about two-thirds of Nepal's countryside, contributing to the nation's
political turmoil.
Nepal's government has been at a virtual standstill since 2002, when
King Gyanendra first dismissed the government and handpicked a new
prime minister. The move led to months of bickering between the king
and political parties, in part over how to end the Maoist insurgency.
The instability also led to the government turning over twice before
King Gyanendra again dismissed the government last week.
This time, the king went further, putting political leaders and
activists under house arrest, censoring the media, cutting off
telecommunications, and deploying troops to the streets of the
capital. He also made it illegal to criticize the government or the
armed forces.
King Gyanendra says he acted because the political parties failed to
organize elections or end the Maoist insurgency. The moves were widely
condemned by rights groups and much of the international community.
But some Nepalese are grateful the king took matters into his own
hands.
Bhagwan Das Shrestra VOA photo - P. NunanIn Dulekhel, shopkeeper
Bhagwan Das Shrestra says he worries about the threat posed by the
Maoists, who have been accused of stealing private property. He says
that before, it was democracy in name only and there was not any sort
of rule. But now that the king has taken over, he is happier because
earlier, if anyone came to loot his shop, he could not have said
anything. Now, he says, law is going to be restored to the land and
that sort of thing will not happen.
The Maoists launched their insurgency in 1996, in an effort to topple
the monarchy. The group loosely models their rebellion on the
teachings of China's late communist leader, Mao Zedong. Since then,
about 11,000 people have died - many in attacks by Maoists for
opposing them, or in attacks by the military for supporting the
rebels.
In Kathmandu, politicians and rights activists charge that King
Gyanendra is using the Maoist rebellion as an excuse to strengthen his
power.
Sujata Koirala of the Nepali Congress Party wants the international
community to stop all support to the government, including military
assistance it receives from several countries, including the United
States, to fight the Maoists.
"We are hoping that … democratic countries like America, the European
Union and our neighbor country India will not support the king's move
and they will not support by giving this undemocratic country
financial support, [and] aid," she said. "And we hope that they will
not give aid to the army. That is the only way how we can stop this
king taking power, because he has only guns with him."
Nepal's new foreign minister, Ramesh Nath Pandey, says he is confident
the donor countries will continue to support Nepal, because of the
international community's broader interest in fighting all forms of
terror.
"To support this government, to support our move, our efforts to
restore peace and security here, our commitment to defeat terrorism -
that is in accordance with the commitment of the free world on
democracy," said Mr. Pandey. "To do anything contradictory to it would
be contradictory to their own fate."
Residents of
Dulekhel;
VOA photo - P. NunanIn Dulekhel, many people say they were angry about
the king's actions - especially his decision to cut off phone and
Internet lines. But many, like this woman, also voice a certain
resignation. She says, that whatever steps the king has taken, they
are done, so people can just hope he can establish peace and security.
In Kathmandu, political party leaders say they are planning to take to
the streets to protest against the government. But it may be difficult
to convince many people that protests are the way to establish
stability for Nepal.