QUOTE(Pie @ May 7 2005, 06:43 PM)
Winston, you are slipping.
Must have finished off KT's merlot
I had the most enjoyable few hours on my birthday........ reading a certain novel in toto. Could not wait to get back into town and to my computer to change my signature
Now who's that author that is being quoted...... albeit out of context a bit
Who is Tom Bombadil?
http://www.cas.unt.edu/~hargrove/bombadil.htmlAn Essay by Gene Hargrove
An earlier version of this paper was published in Mythlore, no. 47 (August 1986).
This version takes into account criticism of the essay and my response in Beyond Bree.
Within the Tolkien household Tom Bombadil was originally a Dutch doll belonging to one of Tolkien's children (Carpenter, Tolkien, p. 162; Grotta-Rurska, Tolkien, p. 101). Tolkien later wrote a poem about him called "The Adventures of Tom Bombadil," published in Oxford Magazine in 1934, long before the writing of the Lord of the Rings began. When Tolkien decided to introduce Tom into the trilogy, little needed to be changed about him or his poem except for the feather in his hat - changed from peacock to swan-wing, since peacocks do not live in Middle-earth (Tolkien, Letters, pp. 318-19).
Many readers of the Lord of the Rings consider Tom's presence in the first book to be an unnecessary intrusion into the narrative, which could be omitted without loss. Tolkien was aware of their feelings, and in part their judgment was correct. As Tolkien wrote in a letter in 1954, ". . . many have found him an odd and indeed discordant ingredient. In historical fact I put him in because I had already invented him. . . and wanted an 'adventure' on the way. But I kept him in, and as he was, because he represents certain things otherwise left out" (Ibid., p. 192). Judging by these remarks, critical readers are correct about the arbitrariness of Tom's introduction into the story; however, as Tolkien continues, he deliberately (nonarbitrary) kept Tom in to fulfill a particular role, to provide an additional dimension
Ms. Pie, you are going to give winston and morambar the impression that I'm a wino!
....and winston, how did you draw the conclusion that Tom was a sexist?
Now say goodnight Gracie!
KT