SSCI FRACTURES OVER CIA DETENTION POLICY
Tensions within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI)
over how to address the continuing controversy regarding CIA prisoner
detention and interrogation policies became manifest this week as
the Committee leaders brought their dispute to the Senate floor.
Their contrasting views reflect fundamentally distinct conceptions
of the role of intelligence oversight.
SSCI Vice Chairman Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) filed a "sense of the
Senate" amendment stating that the SSCI "should conduct an
investigation into ... all matters relating to the ... detention,
interrogation, or rendition of prisoners for intelligence
purposes." The text of the amendment is here:
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2005_cr/sa437.htmlSen. Rockefeller introduced his amendment after Committee Chairman
Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) rebuffed Committee Democrats' call for such
an investigation in a closed-door meeting last week, according to
an article in The Hill newspaper on April 19.
In response to the Rockefeller amendment, Sen. Roberts then filed
his own amendment.
"My amendment actually expresses support for our Armed Forces and
intelligence officers, rather than calling into question their
actions, while they are on the front lines in the war on terror,"
Sen. Roberts said. The Roberts amendment is here:
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2005_cr/sa559.htmlIn the end, neither amendment was taken up by the Senate. But both
Senators presented their perspectives during the floor debate over
the nomination of John D. Negroponte to be Director of National
Intelligence, who was confirmed by a vote of 98-2.
The Senate debate also encompassed a number other interesting and
important issues, including Amb. Negronponte's past role in
Honduras, problems of overclassification, and intelligence agency
responsiveness to congressional requests for information. See:
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2005_cr/s042105.html