Warlords in Afghan Vote Concerns Groups Updated 2:07 PM ET September 12, 2005
http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/news?e=pr...8cis7rg0&src=apBy DANIEL COONEY
KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) - Human rights groups accuse his fighters of killing civilians, raping women and plundering at will during Afghanistan's civil war, yet
Abdul Rasul Sayyaf will be among several reputed warlords running in Sunday's parliamentary elections.
Twenty-one other candidates were disqualified Monday for allegedly having continued ties with militias, but
rights activists fear the presence of Sayyaf and others on the ballot means the key step toward democracy may be undermined by the very men it is trying to marginalize.
"It's like a recurring cancer," said Saman Zia-Zarifi, deputy Asia director for New York-based Human Rights Watch. "The international community and the Afghan government have wasted a great opportunity for this country to move away from the rule of the gun."
Electoral law bars anyone with links to armed groups from competing in the election and a total of 32 candidates have been struck off the ballot for that reason.
But with nearly 2,800 candidates,
activists say many of the warlords involved in the bloodshed of the past quarter-century have slipped through a U.N.-backed review they call woefully inadequate.
"The most powerful people in the provinces are the ones with money and arms, and they are the ones running to be members of parliament," said Kazim Malwan, deputy secretary-general of the National Assembly, which has an administrative structure but no legislators yet. "A big percentage of the candidates are still linked to armed groups."
Some Afghans worry that warlords elected to the legislature may grant themselves immunity from prosecution for past abuses.
"These people are a threat to the future National Assembly. They may impose their own interpretation of the laws and will promote impunity," said Ahmad Nader Nadery, spokesman for the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission. "We are very concerned."
Top U.N. envoy Jean Arnault admitted in an interview with The Associated Press that the vetting process had not been perfect.
"There are, as anybody would expect after 25 years of war, a number of people who will be running that should not be running under the law," he said. "This will not be a perfect election. ... But overall we feel fairly confident the process meets some basic requirements."
Zia-Zarifi, from Human Rights Watch, blamed the review's weakness on a lack of U.S. pressure on the Afghan government and the United Nations.He said the U.S.-led military coalition relies on many local militia leaders in its battle to quash a reinvigorated insurgency by Taliban-led rebels in the south and east.
"There is a lack of appetite in Washington to take on these militias," Zia-Zarifi told the AP.
But even alleged warlords not involved in the fight against the Taliban are being permitted to compete in the elections.
Sayyaf was a powerful leader of guerrillas who helped drive out a Soviet occupation army in the 1980s, and his militia, Ittihad-e Islami, then was heavily involved in the 1990s civil war. He has denied having current links to armed groups, but declined requests for an interview.
Sayyaf "is directly implicated in the abductions and the indiscriminate and intentional targeting of civilians," a Human Rights Watch report charged in July. "There is clear and compelling evidence ... Ittihad forces specifically engaged in widespread killing."
Zia-Zarifi went further: "Sayyaf's name is a symbol for atrocities." He said Sayyaf still commands a militia force based just west of Kabul.
Sayyaf also is an ally of President Hamid Karzai, which worries rights activists. They say the review commission relied on evidence provided by a government-backed disarmament agency, raising questions that those in power used the process to remove rivals from the election.
None of the 21 candidates knocked off the ballot Monday are known to have close ties to Karzai.
The disqualifications, announced by Grant Kippen, chairman of the Electoral Complaints Commission, sparked an immediate denial _ and a threat _ from one of the candidates, Qumandan Didar.
"My supporters will protest and will sabotage the election process," Didar said. "I have no weapons. I have completely disarmed and have no links to armed groups. But I still have thousands of supporters."
Didar was a militia commander during the civil war in the early 1990s but is believed to have fled to Pakistan when the Taliban took control of much of the country later in the decade.