Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Franklin D. Roosevelt Vs. George Bush
Common Ground Common Sense > National & International News > Original Essays, Research and Op-ed Pieces by Our members
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Mar 7 2005, 01:36 PM)
Yes - an accurate summation.

I still find it offensive to think of these two persons in the same breath.

FDR gaves us ---

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself

Bush gaves us ---

The only thing we have to fear is ourselves and all the other little scares Dick and I dream up.

For a christian Bush certainly has little understanding of doctrine. Christian's put their faith in God - and God tells us to fear nothing - but trust in him - this is certainly contrary to terror threat W.
*


Ye, Tazvil04, you sure are correct in your comments.

Right now, Mr. Bush is running around the country like a snake oil salesman, shilling his own brand of snake oil, which is - how imperative it is for future generations to embrace the Bush Doctrine of Social Security reform.

When FDR originated Social Security in 1935 , it was on the premise that S.S. was to be an insurance program with payments certain.

The present occupant of the White House is not content to make a few necessary adjustments to this program.

What is more suitable to him is to have the U.S. go deeper and deeper into debt in order to promote his plan to have seniors play the stock market.

Wall street brokers endorse this whole heartedly. Go figure.

Also in 1935, as part of Roosevelt's New Deal, he pushed through heavier taxes on the wealthy, new controls over banks, a great number of which had gone belly up, causing thousands if not millions of depositors to lose every dime they had saved with no recourse. My own parents lost every cent of their savings because of this.

He also put into place new controls over utilities. If the utility companies want less controls why do they not welcome free competition? How many utility companies are there in your town?

The banks in my town caused the city ( Cleveland, OH ) to go into default in the 1970's because our mayor would not sell the municipal power company to the one and only and powerful power company. The mayor's name ---- Dennis Kucinich.
For more details go to the thread " Life in Our America " page 5, posting # 120.

Franklin Roosevelt also pledged the United States to the " good neighbor " policy which transformed the Monroe Doctrine from a unilateral American manifesto into arrangements for mutual action against aggressors.

Compare these policies with those of the current president.

Is a comparison even possible?

A.B.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Mar 7 2005, 02:54 PM)
Compare these policies with those of the current president.

Is a comparison even possible?

A.B.

Oh, the comparison is STARK, Mr. A.B., STARK, and when it is made, as it is in here, with someone who is George W. Bush's POLAR OPPOSITE, it really serves to show us exactly what we have got here with this George W. Bush and his crowd, and it is a comparison that keeps needing to be made, because FDR is just so long ago that there are very few people anymore with actual, living memories of those times, WHO HAVE THE GUTS TO STAND UP AND SPEAK OUT about the mockery of FDR that it makes when George W. Bush compares himself favorably to FDR!

If George W. Bush is looking for some contemporaries to compare himself to, to make himself stand out in the company that he really should be found in, try Idi Amin, George, and then, LOOK IN A DAMN MIRROR, for with some slight adjustments to size and skin tone, George, you know what I'm trying to say here?

YOU AIN'T NO FDR!

Not by a long shot, so, leave off with the hype that you even might be!
tazvil04
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Mar 7 2005, 02:54 PM)
Ye, Tazvil04, you sure are correct in your comments.

Right now, Mr. Bush is running around the country like a snake oil salesman, shilling his own brand of snake oil, which is - how imperative it is for future generations to embrace the Bush Doctrine of Social Security reform.

When FDR originated Social Security in 1935 , it was on the premise that S.S. was to be an insurance program with payments certain.

The present occupant of the White House is not content to make a few necessary adjustments to this program.

What is more suitable to him is to have the U.S. go deeper and deeper into debt in order to promote his plan to have seniors play the stock market.

Wall street brokers endorse this whole heartedly. Go figure.

Also in 1935, as part of Roosevelt's New Deal, he pushed through heavier taxes on the wealthy, new controls over banks, a great number of which had gone belly up, causing thousands if not millions of depositors to lose every dime they had saved with no recourse. My own parents lost every cent of their savings because of this.

He also put into place new controls over utilities. If the utility companies want less controls why do they not welcome free competition? How many utility companies are there in your town?

The banks in my town caused the city ( Cleveland, OH ) to go into default in the 1970's because our mayor would not sell the municipal power company to the one and only and powerful power company. The mayor's name ---- Dennis Kucinich.
For more details go to the thread " Life in Our America " page 5, posting # 120.

Franklin Roosevelt also pledged the United States to the " good neighbor " policy which transformed the Monroe Doctrine from a unilateral American manifesto into arrangements for mutual action against aggressors.

Compare these policies with those of the current president.

Is a comparison even possible?

A.B.
*


This is perhaps my biggest gripe with Bush.

There is absolutely nothing statesmanlike about him. '

Everything is politically motivated.

It is outcome driven.

Feed the base.

Pay political dues.

Strengthen political base.

The rest of America be damned.

I wish there was a modern film done of Roosevelt so people could be educated as to the true leadership that this man provided and how it differs from what we have today.

The courage this man had.

Granted he got frustrated and wanted to run roughsod over the Supreme Court - but he did not. He ended up working within the frabric of our democracy and he made our nation stronger.

He made each and every individual feel important.

Bush demeans and attacks and belittles.

This shows the smallness of him as a leader and as a person.

He is afraid of ideas and principles...and it shows.
Livyjr
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Mar 7 2005, 04:33 PM)
Bush demeans and attacks and belittles.

This shows the smallness of him as a leader and as a person.

He is afraid of ideas and principles...and it shows.

Yes, it does, but thanks for making sure to point it out all over again!

That is necessary because a lot of people are just too young, or too uninformed to see!

RECALL GEORGE W. BUSH!

VOTE NO CONFIDENCE IN GEORGE W. BUSH.

RECALL GEORGE W. BUSH!
Livyjr
And here, I want to note that the Republicans have kicked up their "grass-roots" internet machine once again, sending out an "article" that was sent around during the campaign season, WHERE FDR IS ATTACKED for having attacked Germany, WITHOUT PROVOCATION, which of course, caused a lot of needless American deaths, and used up a lot of needed American resources, while the HUMANITARIAN BUSH restored liberty, and freedom and justice and GOD, of course, to the hapless people of Iraq, in less time than it took Hillary Clinton to dig up some Rose Law Firm records, or some such crap as that!

FDR IS A WAR CRIMINAL is the message that comes across, and that e-mail is being sent all over America, via the conduit, or more appropriately, "RUNNING SEWER" that the Republicans have turned the internet into, on behalf of George W. Bush, their GOD on earth.

FDR IS A WAR CRIMINAL!

FDR MADE AGGRESSIVE WAR ON THE POOR PEACE-LOVING PEOPLE OF GERMANY!

HE FIRE-BOMBED THEM, WHEN ALL THEY REALLY WANTED WAS HUGS AND KISSES!

FDR IS A MONSTER!

Classic stuff!

And people obviously believe it, because someone sent me the e-mail, to show me just how wrong I am in condemning George W. Bush!

Battle lines are being drawn, here in OUR America, and make no mistake about it, folks!

The only question is that eternal one: WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?

And if you aren't with FDR, take a good hard look at what he was opposing back then, and guess what, THAT IS WHO YOU ARE A PART OF TODAY!

SO!

Be proud, I guess, if you can only stand the stink!

OF DEATH, that surrounds you!
tazvil04
mad.gif
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Mar 8 2005, 09:42 AM)
And here, I want to note that the Republicans have kicked up their "grass-roots" internet machine once again, sending out an "article" that was sent around during the campaign season, WHERE FDR IS ATTACKED for having attacked Germany, WITHOUT PROVOCATION, which of course, caused a lot of needless American deaths, and used up a lot of needed American resources, while the HUMANITARIAN BUSH restored liberty, and freedom and justice and GOD, of course, to the hapless people of Iraq, in less time than it took Hillary Clinton to dig up some Rose Law Firm records, or some such crap as that!

FDR IS A WAR CRIMINAL is the message that comes across, and that e-mail is being sent all over America, via the conduit, or more appropriately, "RUNNING SEWER" that the Republicans have turned the internet into, on behalf of George W. Bush, their GOD on earth.

!
*


This is unbelievable, if true. I wonder if this might be a hoax, making the rounds.

Like every president, FDR had his detractors, but basically, he was so liked, in fact almost revered by the public.

This type of mud slinging could be very counter productive.

When FDR died, I was still in the South Pacific, but from all accounts that I read, and also saw in the news reels that were very popular at the time, there was a huge amount of national mourning.

People shocked.

Thousands and thousands crying in the streets.

FDR was a true icon.

Unlike certain others.

RECALL GEORGE BUSH'

A.B.
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Mar 8 2005, 07:42 AM)
And here, I want to note that the Republicans have kicked up their "grass-roots" internet machine once again, sending out an "article" that was sent around during the campaign season, WHERE FDR IS ATTACKED for having attacked Germany, WITHOUT PROVOCATION, which of course, caused a lot of needless American deaths, and used up a lot of needed American resources, while the HUMANITARIAN BUSH restored liberty, and freedom and justice and GOD, of course, to the hapless people of Iraq, in less time than it took Hillary Clinton to dig up some Rose Law Firm records, or some such crap as that!

FDR IS A WAR CRIMINAL is the message that comes across, and that e-mail is being sent all over America, via the conduit, or more appropriately, "RUNNING SEWER" that the Republicans have turned the internet into, on behalf of George W. Bush, their GOD on earth.

FDR IS A WAR CRIMINAL!

FDR MADE AGGRESSIVE WAR ON THE POOR PEACE-LOVING PEOPLE OF GERMANY!

HE FIRE-BOMBED THEM, WHEN ALL THEY REALLY WANTED WAS HUGS AND KISSES!

FDR IS A MONSTER!

Classic stuff!

And people obviously believe it, because someone sent me the e-mail, to show me just how wrong I am in condemning George W. Bush!

Battle lines are being drawn, here in OUR America, and make no mistake about it, folks!

The only question is that eternal one: WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?

And if you aren't with FDR, take a good hard look at what he was opposing back then, and guess what, THAT IS WHO YOU ARE A PART OF TODAY!

SO!

Be proud, I guess, if you can only stand the stink!

OF DEATH, that surrounds you!
*



That's a laff! The Bush family made its fortune by trading with the Nazis. See

http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm
tazvil04
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Mar 8 2005, 09:18 AM)
This is unbelievable, if true. I wonder if this might be a hoax, making the rounds.

Like every president, FDR had his detractors, but basically, he was so liked, in fact almost revered by the public.

This type of mud slinging could be very counter productive.

When FDR died, I was still in the South Pacific, but from all accounts that I read, and also saw in the news reels that were very popular at the time, there was a huge amount of national mourning.

People shocked.

Thousands and thousands crying in the streets.

FDR was a true icon.

Unlike certain others.

RECALL GEORGE BUSH'

A.B.
*


Absolutely - despicable muckraking.

The Republican Party led by George Bush is destroying America and its proud history of world leadership.

Just look at how the Eisenhower family disavowed Bush when one of his sons came out in support of Kerry --- and Bush quoting LIncoln has looked so small in his wake - and then we have Ronald Reagan, Jr. in his column calling Bush no Ronald Reagan...

It is so sad that the Republican Party hasn't the political courage to deal honestly with the American people or Bush...
Livyjr
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Mar 8 2005, 09:18 AM)
This is unbelievable, if true.

I wonder if this might be a hoax, making the rounds.

RECALL GEORGE BUSH'

A.B.

NO!

It is not a hoax, Mr. A.B., as I know this particular "sender", although only through the internet, and this person, as a fellow "military" is trying to get me, as a fellow veteran, to see just how screwed up I really am in my thinking about GOD and George W. Bush!

In his words to me, I am a "left-leaner", which is modern-day speak for COMMIE!

"YOU'RE ON THE WRONG SIDE, Livyjr!"

"YEAH, like HELL!"

And this person is another generation removed from mine, which itself, me included, HAD NO REAL LIVING CONTACT with FDR, so that all we know is what we heard OUR parents, and other adults of the time, say about FDR.

IF OUR parents liked George Herbert Walker, who is the father of the wife of Prescott Bush, who is the father of George H. W. Bush, who is the father of George W. Bush, AND IF OUR parents liked Prescott Bush, THEN THEY HATED FDR, because FDR brought down both George Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush!

AND THERE IS WHERE IT IS, Mr. A.B., RIGHT EXACTLY THERE!

IF YOU ARE ON THE ONE SIDE, says the propaganda, well, then you are on the wrong side, and that is just that!

George Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush WERE GOOD PEOPLE HELPING THE PEACE-LOVING PEOPLE OF GERMANY GET THEIR ECONOMY GOING!

FDR WAS A BAD MAN!

FDR WAS A MEAN MAN!

FDR ATTACKED THE PEACE-LOVING PEOPLE OF GERMANY, WITHOUT PROVOCATION, and he also attacked George Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush, without provocation, and he took, stole, their money!

Q.E.D.!

According to the "revisionist" history OF OUR TIMES, anyway!

You, Mr. A.B., have powerful memories of those times, BECAUSE YOU WERE THERE!

And what percent of the population are you now?

One percent?

Three percent?

A half percent?

In the meantime, the Republicans, thanks to Karl Rove, HAVE CONTROL OF THE INTERNET, which is something a good part of your generation and mine included, have little real knowledge of, as far as actual control of the medium as a tool of mass communications.

WHAT IS THE TRUTH, Mr. A.B., and who "OWNS" it?

If I think, OR RATHER, IF I WANT THE WORLD TO THINK THAT you are nothing but a crazy old fool, SO THAT I CAN SUPPRESS AND DISCREDIT EVERY WORD OF TRUTH THAT YOU UTTER IN HERE, and I know the internet, through these Yahoo groups, etc., I can take your words and disseminate them as the ravings of "ONE OF THEM", the "crazies", the "zanies", who are "un-patriotic", the "left-leaners", the "FDR SOCIALISTS" who want to lay America low, who want to pick the pockets of America's deservedly rich folks, who unlike the "poor", actually WORK FOR THEIR MONEY, and therefore, DESERVE TO HAVE EVEN MORE, and thereby, I can discredit, IN THE EYES OF AMERICA, every word you are saying, to a relatively small group of people in here, AND you will likely not even know that you are under attack!

And there is the "GAME"!

FDR IS A BAD MAN!

SEE WHAT HE DID TO THE PEACE-LOVING PEOPLE OF GERMANY?

GEORGE W. BUSH IS A GOOD MAN!

SEE WHAT HE DID FOR THE FREEDOM-LOVING PEOPLE OF IRAQ?

Repeat it over and over and well, I know you get the picture, because you are old, and you have seen!

But as for America?

Outside of where the best shopping mall in America really is, and whether Michael Jackson might be a pervert, well, ..........
Livyjr
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Mar 8 2005, 09:36 AM)
It is so sad that the Republican Party hasn't the political courage to deal honestly with the American people or Bush...

tazvil, come, come, here!

Deal honestly?

THIS IS HARD-BALL POLITICS!

IT IS ABOUT POWER!

IT IS ABOUT BEING DOMINANT!

Words right from the mouth of the "ARCHITECT", Karl Rove!

You keep talking that "truth and honesty" crap, and why someone might just accuse you of being me!
tazvil04
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Mar 8 2005, 09:58 AM)
tazvil, come, come, here!

Deal honestly?

THIS IS HARD-BALL POLITICS!

IT IS ABOUT POWER!

IT IS ABOUT BEING DOMINANT!

Words right from the mouth of the "ARCHITECT", Karl Rove!

You keep talking that "truth and honesty" crap, and why someone might just accuse you of being me!
*

lol.gif

Sorry - I come from the school of idealism or wishful reality.

I thought I was awakened in 1988 when I came to the conclusion that statesmanship did not begin until you were elected - meaning you do whatever you need to to get elected - but once elected you have an obligation to govern based upon your principles and convictions in the best interests of all Americans.

I beleive this is how our greatest presidents governed.

I even believe that this is how Reagan and Bush I governed. I did not always - in fact rarely - agreed with their policies - but I believe that they felt they were doing what was best for the nation as a whole even if it turned out they were wrong.

However, with Bush - I believe we have slid into the zero sum game of politics where Bush does whatever he can to advance the political and partisan goals he has - no matter what effect it has on the rest or the most of America...

This machiavellian display has perverted the American system of governance and at the same time our international standing in the world. blink.gif
pennsylvaniagal
I add this - from The Nation

Roosevelt vs. Bush
by John Nichols

President Bush is losing his fight to privatize Social Security.

Even his own allies, such as House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., are warning the president that he cannot force the American people to accept the radical reworking of Social Security that Bush's allies in the financial services industry want.

In fact, the only hope the president has left is outright distortion of the facts - by the White House and by its amen corner in the media.

The Fox News Channel, which has a long history of being more loyal to the Bush administration than it is to the truth, is currently peddling the biggest of the big lies.

Fox news analyst Brit Hume and other Fox personalities have begun claiming that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, an iconic figure among elderly Americans at least in part because of the role he played in creating the Social Security system, favored privatizations schemes of the sort that President Bush is pushing.

Roosevelt:"It turns out that FDR himself planned to include private investment accounts in the Social Security program when he proposed it," claimed Hume in a recent broadcast, where he also suggested that Roosevelt wanted the federal program to ultimately be supplanted by "self-supporting annuity plans."

To "substantiate" his statement, Hume rearranged Roosevelt's words to fake up "quotes" that seemed to suggest the 32nd president would have approved of undermining the Social Security system in order to enrich Wall Street.

The former president's grandson, James Roosevelt Jr., was so offended by Hume's abuse of FDR's words that he said last week, "(Hume) rearranged those sentences in an outrageous distortion, one that really calls for a retraction, an apology, maybe even a resignation."

James Roosevelt Jr. is not merely a guardian of his grandfather's legacy, he is a former associate commissioner for the Social Security system. In other words, he knows what he is talking about.
That's more than can be said for Hume and other conservative commentators - notably William Bennett and the Wall Street Journal's John Fund - who have tried to suggest that FDR would have favored privatization.

"It is really quite amazing to me that all of the folks supporting privatization, from the president on down, keep invoking the name of my grandfather, Franklin Delano Roosevelt," says James Roosevelt. "I think it's, in a way, it is flattering to him. It is testimony to how successful the program that he put in place has been and continues to be."

Asked by MSNBC host Keith Olbermann whether his grandfather was opposed to the sort of privatization schemes the Bush administration is now proposing, James Roosevelt said, "I'm definitely convinced of that."

Noting that "the dedicated Social Security tax has been very successful over the years in raising almost all of our elderly citizens out of poverty," where half of them were in poverty before Social Security, James Roosevelt said of his grandfather, "I'm convinced he never intended to phase it out."

Here's a tip: In the great debate over Social Security, put your faith in people named Roosevelt, not Bush - or certainly not Hume.

Copyright © 2005 The Nation

http://www.commondreams.org/cgi-bin/print....s05/0306-24.htm


'Nuff said.
tazvil04
good post pagal ---

That's where my faith lies.

In the Roosevelts.

The Bush's could have three presidencies and not compare to the one of FDR...
pennsylvaniagal
One only has to think about the stock market crash of 1929. Who in their right mind would come back six years later, after the depression had begun, the banks failing, and say that "the stock market is where you should put some of your money"???

Hogwash mad.gif
Livyjr
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Mar 8 2005, 10:09 AM)
lol.gif

Sorry - I come from the school of idealism or wishful reality.

I thought I was awakened in 1988 when I came to the conclusion that statesmanship did not begin until you were elected - meaning you do whatever you need to to get elected - but once elected you have an obligation to govern based upon your principles and convictions in the best interests of all Americans.

I believe this is how our greatest presidents governed.

However, with Bush - I believe we have slid into the zero sum game of politics where Bush does whatever he can to advance the political and partisan goals he has - no matter what effect it has on the rest or the most of America...

This machiavellian display has perverted the American system of governance and at the same time our international standing in the world. 

And well said, tazvil!

Well said, indeed!

George W. Bush is out to dismantle OUR America, and re-make it in his image, which will be in essence a return to the politics of the 1880's and 1890's, when the Jay Goulds and the ROBBER BARONS were KINGS, and the common folks OWED their souls to the COMPANY STORE!
tazvil04
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Mar 8 2005, 03:02 PM)
And well said, tazvil!

Well said, indeed!

George W. Bush is out to dismantle OUR America, and re-make it in his image, which will be in essence a return to the politics of the 1880's and 1890's, when the Jay Goulds and the ROBBER BARONS were KINGS, and the common folks OWED their souls to the COMPANY STORE!
*


Robber Baron is a perfect analogy - except the difference is none of the robber barons were ever president - they may have owned presidents - but they never actually controlled the institutions of government.

Dangerous precedent.
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Mar 8 2005, 02:12 PM)
Robber Baron is a perfect analogy - except the difference is none of the robber barons were ever president - they may have owned presidents - but they never actually controlled the institutions of government.

Dangerous precedent.
*

It's easier to understand when you remember that Cheney is the organ grinder; Bush is merely the monkey.
Livyjr
George W. Bush - SOFT ON CORPORATE CRIME!
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Mar 9 2005, 11:11 PM)
It's easier to understand when you remember that Cheney is the organ grinder; Bush is merely the monkey.
*



In 1932 When FDR was elected president, he recognized that what was needed badly was for the people to have jobs and to have confidence in the government.

The following write up illustrates some of the actions FDR put into place immediately after he took office.

Compare these with what is going on in Washington now.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected to the presidency in 1932, it was on a promise to restore the confidence of the American people and to bring America out of the Great Depression. Roosevelt stated in his first inaugural address that "we have nothing to fear but fear itself." His objectives were to calm the economic fears of Americans, develop policies to alleviate the problems of the Great Depression, and gain the support of the American people for his programs.

Immediately after his election, Roosevelt began to formulate policies to bring about relief from the economic hardships the American people were experiencing. These programs became known as the New Deal, a reference taken from a campaign speech in which he promised a "new deal for the American people." The New Deal focused on three general goals: relief for the needy, economic recovery, and financial reform. During the One Hundred Days, Congress enacted 15 major pieces of legislation establishing New Deal agencies and programs. Among these was the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which was established to protect depositors from losing their savings in the event of bank failure. Another program was the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), which put thousands of men to work on projects in national forests, parks, and public lands. The Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) was created to ease the desperate plight of the farmer during the Depression by establishing a program of production limits and federal subsidies. To address the problems of industry and workers, Congress passed the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) in June 1933. The NIRA established codes of fair practice for individual industries in order to promote industrial growth. It also created the National Recovery Administration (NRA). The NRA was perhaps one of the most sweeping and controversial of the early New Deal programs. Its purposes were twofold: first, to stabilize business with codes of "fair" competitive practice and, second, to generate more purchasing power by providing jobs, defining labor standards, and raising wages. The NRA also reflected trade union hopes for protection of basic hour and wage standards and liberal hopes for comprehensive planning. General Hugh S. Johnson headed the NRA and eventually proposed a "blanket code" pledging employers generally to observe the same labor standards. By mid-July 1933 he launched a crusade to whip up popular support for the NRA and its symbol of compliance, the "Blue Eagle," with the motto "We do our part." The eagle, which had been modeled on an Indian thunderbird, was displayed in windows and stamped on products to show a business's compliance. There was even a parade down New York's Fifth Avenue with over a quarter of a million marchers in September to show support for the NRA and the "Blue Eagle."

This is what we have now:

Less confidence in the government.

Jobs emigrating to countries all over the world.

Social Security under attack.

Huge budget deficits.

Occupying another country while we condemn others for doing the same.

etc., etc, etc.

A.B.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Mar 12 2005, 12:34 PM)
In 1932 When FDR was elected president, he recognized that what was needed badly was for the people to have jobs and to have confidence in the government.

When Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected to the presidency in 1932, it was on a promise to restore the confidence of the American people and to bring America out of the Great Depression.

Roosevelt stated in his first inaugural address that "we have nothing to fear but fear itself."

His objectives were to calm the economic fears of Americans .......

Immediately after his election, Roosevelt began to formulate policies to bring about relief from the economic hardships the American people were experiencing.

These programs became known as the New Deal, a reference taken from a campaign speech in which he promised a "new deal for the American people."

The New Deal focused on three general goals: relief for the needy, economic recovery, and financial reform.


During the One Hundred Days, Congress enacted 15 major pieces of legislation establishing New Deal agencies and programs.

Among these was the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which was established to protect depositors from losing their savings in the event of bank failure.

Another program was the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), which put thousands of men to work on projects in national forests, parks, and public lands.

A.B.

I have met older Americans who were in CCC camps in their younger days, and everyone of them was very thankful for what that experience of being productive with their lives meant to them.

They thought it was uplifting, and gave them a confidence and belief in themselves as young people that carried through into their older lives, which is the point they were at when I met some of them.

Near me, up in the mountains, we have a CCC dam, and I go up there every now and then, just to sit there, because it is a place of quiet and natural beauty.

That dam also quieted a lot of floods that could have been, BUT FOR ....

SO!

It was not just "make work"!

Under this Bush Co., the economic fears of Americans are being revived, and big time.

And as to confidence in government?

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Mar 12 2005, 05:38 PM)
I have met older Americans who were in CCC camps in their younger days, and everyone of them was very thankful for what that experience of being productive with their lives meant to them.

They thought it was uplifting, and gave them a confidence and belief in themselves as young people that carried through into their older lives, which is the point they were at when I met some of them.

Near me, up in the mountains, we have a CCC dam, and I go up there every now and then, just to sit there, because it is a place of quiet and natural beauty.

That dam also quieted a lot of floods that could have been, BUT FOR ....

SO!

It was not just "make work"!

Under this Bush Co., the economic fears of Americans are being revived, and big time.

And as to confidence in government?

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!
*

I can't tell you HOW MANY bridges, tunnels, dams, public libraries, City and County buildings in and around Los Angeles have a 1930's date in the cornerstone.

I think we have a small dam on the Colorado that made agriculture possible in the southwest. It also made Las Vegas possible. The law of unintended consequences.
Livyjr
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Mar 14 2005, 10:21 AM)
I can't tell you HOW MANY bridges, tunnels, dams, public libraries, City and County buildings in and around Los Angeles have a 1930's date in the cornerstone.

I think we have a small dam on the Colorado that made agriculture possible in the southwest.

It also made Las Vegas possible.

The law of unintended consequences.

The LAW of unintended consequences, indeed!

CCC dams making two entirely different kinds of "refuges" possible for future generations!

One for me, a refuge from the insanity of the modern world; the other, a "refuge" from the sanity of the natural world!
brendan
I posted this on our newsfeed.
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Feb 24 2005, 07:02 AM)
George Bush has recently started comparing himself to one of our former great presidents, Franklin D. Roosevelt.

*

"The only thing we have to fear is... fear itself" - FDR

"The only thing we have is... fear itself" - GWB
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Mar 18 2005, 09:00 PM)
"The only thing we have to fear is... fear itself" - FDR

"The only thing we have is... fear itself" - GWB
*



Several weeks ago, many T.V. stations would not broadcast the movie " Saving Private Ryan "

The reason: They were AFRAID the FCC would censure them or fine them because of the graphic language.

When the film was shown in theaters, it was a big hit. I do not recall any objections to the language at that time.

In today's N.Y. times there is a story about IMAX theaters not showing a film which includes some material about the theory of evolution.

The reason: They were AFRAID the religious right would object.

Are we becoming a fearful nation?

Are we becoming a nation of people who fears our own government?

If not, should we be?

As jeffmoskin notes, under George Bush, shouldn't we be fearing being fearful?

Franklin D. Roosevelt said it first but he said it right.

" The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. "

A.B.
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Mar 14 2005, 11:21 AM)
I can't tell you HOW MANY bridges, tunnels, dams, public libraries, City and County buildings in and around Los Angeles have a 1930's date in the cornerstone.

I think we have a small dam on the Colorado that made agriculture possible in the southwest. It also made Las Vegas possible. The law of unintended consequences.
*



In addition to the program CCC, which stood for Civilian Conservation Corps, ( I believe I have that right ) which FDR started shortly after being elected preident in 1932 he also originated other programs.

The purpose of these programs was to provide employment for jobless people, of which there were many since the depression was deeply entrenched.

President Roosevelt thought it was of prime importance to get people back to work in order to get the economy rolling again.

A short write up about one of the other programs called Works Progress Administration " WPA " follows.

George Bush also believes in the importance of men and women having gainful employment.

He just doesn't think the jobs should be here in America.

A.B.



The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was a relief measure established in 1935 by executive order as the Works Progress Administration, and was redesigned in 1939 when it was transferred to the Federal Works Agency. Headed by Harry L. Hopkins and supplied with an initial congressional appropriation of $4,880,000,000, it offered work to the unemployed on an unprecedented scale by spending money on a wide variety of programs, including highways and building construction, slum clearance, reforestation, and rural rehabilitation. So gigantic an undertaking was inevitably attended by confusion, waste, and political favoritism, yet the 'pump-priming' effect stimulated private business during the depression years (audio clip, 87k) and inaugurated reforms that states had been unable to subsidize.
Particularly novel were the special programs. The Federal Writers' Project (more information available from Indiana State University's library) prepared state and regional guide books, organized archives, indexed newspapers, and conducted useful sociological and historical investigations. The Federal Arts Project gave unemployed artists the opportunity to decorate hundreds of post offices, schools, and other public buildings with murals, canvases, and sculptures; musicians organized symphony orchestras and community singing.(video clip, 493k) The Federal Theatre Project experimented with untried modes, and scores of stock companies toured the country with repertories of old and new plays, thus bringing drama to communities where it had been known only through the radio. (audio clip, 67k)

By March, 1936, the WPA rolls had reached a total of more than 3,400,000 persons; after initial cuts in June 1939, it averaged 2,300,000 monthly; and by June 30, 1943, when it was officially terminated, the WPA had employed more than 8,500,000 different persons on 1,410,000 individual projects, and had spent about $11 billion. During its 8-year history, the WPA built 651,087 miles of highways, roads, and streets; and constructed, repaired, or improved 124,031 bridges, 125,110 public buildings, 8,192 parks, and 853 airport landing fields.

(Sources: Encyclopedia of American History, 7th Ed., Jeffrey B. Morris and Richard B. Morris, eds., 1996. The Oxford Companion to American History, Thomas H. Johnson. 1966)
TheRestofUs
FDR the "Bright Father".

GWB the "Dark Father".
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(TheRestofUs @ Mar 19 2005, 01:35 PM)
FDR the "Bright Father".

GWB the "Dark Father".
*


You are too kind to GWB.

A.B.
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Mar 19 2005, 05:00 PM)
You are too kind to GWB.

A.B.
*

BUMP!

The mods are cleaning house again.
underbear1
What's to compare one was a great president with a great First Lady, and the other is in the White House now, from vote fraud and propaganda. mad.gif
marc-the-democrat
I remeber during the 2000 Republican Convention he had mentioned that there was another Geoge W that led this country... some how trying to equate himslef to George Washington. It made me sick to my stomach. This guy is so full of himself. His legacy is failure and low standards and he needs to start getting used to it.
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(marc-the-democrat @ Mar 21 2005, 03:12 PM)
I remeber during the 2000 Republican Convention he had mentioned that there was another Geoge W that led this country...  some how trying to equate himslef to George Washington.  It made me sick to my stomach.  This guy is so full of himself.  His legacy is failure and low standards and he needs to start getting used to it.
*



Well said.

The tragedy to the country is that this imposter actually believes that he belongs right up there with the the great presidents.

A.B.
jesseaw
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Feb 24 2005, 07:35 PM)
Okay, I will.

SLOGAN:

George W Bush has recently taken to comparing himself to Franklin D Roosevelt. But the only thing they have in common is Social Security:
FDR created it, and GWB is determined to finish it off.

Is this okay?
*



Definitely okay!! Great and true slogan!! Please do send it to the Democrats and Howard Dean with your okay to use it in their campaign to counter George W. Bush's lies and deceit.

Hope this helps.

Sincerely,

Jesseaw
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Feb 24 2005, 09:02 AM)
George Bush has recently started comparing himself to one of our former great presidents, Franklin D. Roosevelt.

This president was a president during my younger years and also during my military service in World War II.

M. Bush would be wise to not compare himself with this president.

F.D.R. as he was known to the public was one who leveled with Americans.

Here is one example.

This article written by Columnist Bob Herbert of the N.Y. Times

April 18, 2005
OP-ED COLUMNIST
A Radical in the White House
By BOB HERBERT

ast week - April 12, to be exact - was the 60th anniversary of the death of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. "I have a terrific headache," he said, before collapsing at the Little White House in Warm Springs, Ga. He died of a massive cerebral hemorrhage on the 83rd day of his fourth term as president. His hold on the nation was such that most Americans, stunned by the announcement of his death that spring afternoon, reacted as though they had lost a close relative.

That more wasn't made of this anniversary is not just a matter of time; it's a measure of the distance the U.S. has traveled from the egalitarian ideals championed by F.D.R. His goal was "to make a country in which no one is left out." That kind of thinking has long since been consigned to the political dumpster. We're now in the age of Bush, Cheney and DeLay, small men committed to the concentration of big bucks in the hands of the fortunate few.

To get a sense of just how radical Roosevelt was (compared with the politics of today), consider the State of the Union address he delivered from the White House on Jan. 11, 1944. He was already in declining health and, suffering from a cold, he gave the speech over the radio in the form of a fireside chat.

After talking about the war, which was still being fought on two fronts, the president offered what should have been recognized immediately for what it was, nothing less than a blueprint for the future of the United States. It was the clearest statement I've ever seen of the kind of nation the U.S. could have become in the years between the end of World War II and now. Roosevelt referred to his proposals in that speech as "a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race or creed."

Among these rights, he said, are:

"The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation.

"The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation.

"The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living.

"The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad.

"The right of every family to a decent home.

"The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health.

"The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident and unemployment.

"The right to a good education."

I mentioned this a few days ago to an acquaintance who is 30 years old. She said, "Wow, I can't believe a president would say that."

Roosevelt's vision gave conservatives in both parties apoplexy in 1944 and it would still drive them crazy today. But the truth is that during the 1950's and 60's the nation made substantial progress toward his wonderfully admirable goals, before the momentum of liberal politics slowed with the war in Vietnam and the election in 1968 of Richard Nixon.

It wouldn't be long before Ronald Reagan was, as the historian Robert Dallek put it, attacking Medicare as "the advance wave of socialism" and Dick Cheney, from a seat in Congress, was giving the thumbs down to Head Start. Mr. Cheney says he has since seen the light on Head Start. But his real idea of a head start is to throw government money at people who already have more cash than they know what to do with. He's one of the leaders of the G.O.P. gang (the members should all wear masks) that has executed a wholesale transfer of wealth via tax cuts from working people to the very rich.

Roosevelt was far from a perfect president, but he gave hope and a sense of the possible to a nation in dire need. And he famously warned against giving in to fear.

The nation is now in the hands of leaders who are experts at exploiting fear, and indifferent to the needs and hopes, even the suffering, of ordinary people.

"The test of our progress," said Roosevelt, "is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."

Sixty years after his death we should be raising a toast to F.D.R. and his progressive ideas. And we should take that opportunity to ask: How in the world did we allow ourselves to get from there to here?


E-mail: bobherb@nytimes.com




*
Livyjr
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Mar 18 2005, 08:00 PM)
"The only thing we have to fear is... fear itself" - FDR

"The only thing we have is... fear itself" - GWB

"I need to be able to move the right people to the right place at the right time to protect you, and I'm not going to accept a lousy bill out of the United Nations Senate!"

-THE president of the United States, The Most Honrable George W. Bush, South Bend, Indiana; October 31, 2002
Livyjr
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Mar 21 2005, 02:17 PM)
Well said.

The tragedy to the country is that this imposter actually believes that he belongs right up there with the the great presidents.

A.B.

I think I would have the tragedy as being from all of the Americans who truly believe that George W. Bush should be at the top of the heap when it comes to who did the best job as an American president!

That is not only a tragedy, but what does it bode for this nation's future, when someone like George W. Bush has become the STANDARD by which the next American presidential candidate will be measured, and then chosen?
Livyjr
"Natural gas is hemispheric!"

"I like to call it hemispheric in nature, because it is a product that we can find in our neighborhoods!"


- George W. Bush, the ULTIMATE president of the United States, Austin, Texas; December 20, 2000
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Apr 20 2005, 06:21 AM)
"Natural gas is hemispheric!"

"I like to call it hemispheric in nature, because it is a product that we can find in our neighborhoods!"


- George W. Bush, the ULTIMATE president of the United States, Austin, Texas; December 20, 2000

And for all you people out there who are trying to compare FDR to George W. Bush, I'll bet FDR never would have thought up something like this to say to the world, while he was president!

Now, what does that say about FDR?
amy
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Apr 20 2005, 08:23 AM)
And for all you people out there who are trying to compare FDR to George W. Bush, I'll bet FDR never would have thought up something like this to say to the world, while he was president!

Now, what does that say about FDR?
*


'What does that say about FDR?" Well, it says that he was a wise, articulate, intelligent man! Now GW Bush on the other hand...... whistling.gif
Livyjr
QUOTE(amy @ Apr 20 2005, 06:55 AM)
'What does that say about FDR?"

Well, it says that he was a wise, articulate, intelligent man!

Now GW Bush on the other hand...... whistling.gif

Well done, amy!
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Apr 20 2005, 07:05 PM)
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Apr 20 2005, 06:21 AM)
"Natural gas is hemispheric!"

"I like to call it hemispheric in nature, because it is a product that we can find in our neighborhoods!"

- George W. Bush, the ULTIMATE president of the United States, Austin, Texas; December 20, 2000

Well done, amy!
*


Words fail me.

A.B.
amy
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Apr 20 2005, 08:14 PM)
Words fail me.

A.B.
*


How on earth did GW Bush get through Yale Univ.? He graduated with a "C" average, didn't he? Not that grades are necessarily an indicator of intelligence, but... in this case I do wonder...
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(amy @ Apr 20 2005, 07:36 PM)
How on earth did GW Bush get through Yale Univ.? He graduated with a "C" average, didn't he? Not that grades are necessarily an indicator of intelligence, but... in this case I do wonder...
*


When you have an elitist father who is an alumnus ( or is it alumni ) of Yale and continues to send big bucks to the school, it is a given that you are going to " get through " Yale or practically any other university.

That's also how he shows up with a ' C' average. Did you think he really was THAT smart?

If it was you, Amy, - and I'm pretty sure it was - who left those muffins on the table, thank you. I chomped down two of them and left a couple for anyone else who came by.

I plan to bring Beacon over to the place one of these days. He may not want to leave.

A.B.
amy
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Apr 20 2005, 08:54 PM)
When you have an elitist father who is an alumnus ( or is it alumni ) of Yale and continues to send big bucks to the school, it is a given that you are going to " get through " Yale or practically any other university.

That's also how he shows up with a ' C' average. Did you think he really was THAT smart?

If it was you, Amy, - and I'm pretty sure it was - who left those muffins on the table, thank you. I chomped down two of them and left a couple for anyone else who came by.

I plan to bring Beacon over to the place one of these days. He may not want to leave.

A.B.
*


Ah, I will leave some biscuits for Beacon or does he enjoy muffins? He really is a beautiful dog-are English setters "high strung"?
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(Abu Beacon @ Apr 20 2005, 05:54 PM)
When you have an elitist father who is an alumnus ( or is it alumni ) of Yale and continues to send big bucks to the school, it is a given that you are going to " get through " Yale or practically any other university.

That's also how he shows up with a ' C' average. Did you think he really was THAT smart?

If it was you, Amy, - and I'm pretty sure it was - who left those muffins on the table, thank you. I chomped down two of them and left a couple for anyone else who came by.

I plan to bring Beacon over to the place one of these days. He may not want to leave.

A.B.
*

Chances are you will find the existance of a "BUSH HALL". Perhaps Beacon will wish to relieve himself there.
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(amy @ Apr 20 2005, 08:01 PM)
amy, I am going to respond to this on A.B.'s Corners.
*
Abu Beacon
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Apr 20 2005, 08:11 PM)
Chances are you will find the existance of a "BUSH HALL". Perhaps Beacon will wish to relieve himself there.
*


I am particular where I take Beacon.

A.B.
amy
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Apr 20 2005, 09:11 PM)
Chances are you will find the existance of a "BUSH HALL". Perhaps Beacon will wish to relieve himself there.
*

Got me laughing out loud again! roflmbo.gif
Livyjr
QUOTE(amy @ Apr 20 2005, 06:36 PM)
How on earth did GW Bush get through Yale Univ.?

"What I'm suggesting to you is, if you can't name the foreign minister of Mexico, therefore, you know, you're not capable of what you do."

"But the truth of the matter is, you are, whether you can, or not!"


- Just one of the seemingly endless stream of PROFUNDITIES uttered by the sauve, erudite and urbane president of the United States, the inestimable George W. Bush, as quoted in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer; November 6, 1999
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.