Bangladesh: Arrests of Islamic Militants Raise Questions about Terror
http://enews.voanews.com/t?ctl=C12631:2F72C9DCountry banned two extremist Islamic groups and arrested 70 of members
this month Bangladesh has banned two extremist Islamic groups and
arrested 70 of their members this month - admitting a problem the
country has long denied. The question now being asked is whether
Bangladesh's homegrown militant groups could be linked to any global
terrorist organizations. In the past month, the Bangladesh government
arrested 70 militants from Jagrata Muslim Janata Bangladesh and
Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen and banned the two radical Islamic groups.The
suspects have been charged with sedition for their alleged roles in a
series of killings, robberies and political violence and bombings
across the country. The charges do not include attacks on opposition
party members, such as an assassination attempt on the former prime
minister, Sheikh Hasina. Abdul Jalil, the general secretary of the
opposition Awami League, says his party is pleased, as it has been
trying to convince the government for years to move against militant
organizations. He thinks the difference now is Dhaka is under
international pressure to do more to crackdown on militancy in the age
of anti-terrorism. "By doing this, they have accepted the reality. But
still then the people of Bangladesh doubt that the arrests and taking
action against all these fundamentalist parties is [anything] but an
eyewash to the foreign world," he said.Critics say the government has
been reluctant to act because of tensions within the ruling coalition
- which for the first time include two Islamic parties: Islami Oikya
Jote and Jamaat-e-Islami. The government denies this is an issue. But
some experts note there has been a so-called " Islamicization" of
Bangladeshi politics since Islamic parties entered the government in
2001. Ali Dayan Hasan, the Bangladesh analyst for Human Rights Watch -
based in Pakistan, said "Jamaat-e-Islami is an international
organization. It has a political wing that operates in Pakistan. And
it is an ideological international religious organization. It has very
clearly statedpolitical aims. Those political aims go against the
grain of pluralism and democracy and secular politics, as we
understand it… And the second you have that sort of political outlet
as a member of the government, you have to start catering to its
demands."Bangladesh was founded as a secular state in 1971, when it
broke free of neighboring Pakistan. The vast majority of its 141
million people are moderate Muslims. And members of the ruling
coalition say there are no designs to change the system. Abdur Razzak
is a spokesman for the Jamaat-e-Islami and he denies his party wants
more Islam in government. "It has been taking part in the elections of
this country since 1979. It has been represented in the parliament in
one way or another. Jamaat believes in rule of law, multi-body
systems, democracy, human rights, independence of judiciary - you name
it," he said.Despite political disagreements about why the government
decided to act now against these two Islamic militant groups - there
is general agreement that they pose a threat. But is the nature of
that threat related in any way to international terror
organizations?Zachary Abuza is the author of the book, "The Rise of
Militant Islam in Southeast Asia." He sees parallels between the
attitude of the Bangladesh government today and that of the Indonesian
government, before the 2002 terrorist bombings on Bali by a militant
group linked toal-Qaida. "What is coming out of the Bangladesh
government sounds hauntingly like what is coming out of the Indonesian
government before the Bali attacks. You're getting this constant
mantra about how they're moderate; it's a tolerant, secular society
that has no tradition of Islamic radicalism. And I think that really
belies some of the evidence we've seen," he said.That evidence, says
Mr. Abuza, is anecdotal but worrying. Bangladeshi radicals have fought
alongside the hard-line Islamic Taleban in Afghanistan. And there are
some Bangladeshis who support Osama bin Laden - the head of the
al-Qaida terror network, which has declared a holy war on the United
States and non-Muslims. But despite those tentative links, Mr. Abuza,
along with Human Rights Watch and Bangladesh government and opposition
leaders, say there is no compelling evidence to suggest that al-Qaida
is using Bangladesh to hide or train operatives for its campaign of
global terror, as it did in Afghanistan.There is more concern that
smaller militant organizations - possibly regional groups from
northeastern India or Pakistan, fighting against their own governments
- could be taking advantage of what had been the government's apparent
reluctance to act against them. That would make Bangladesh a refuge
for militant organizations seeking to hide or train for their own
operations.Christine Fair is a South Asia analyst for the independent
policy group, the United States Institute of Peace, based in
Washington. "I don't think it's in the realm of the far-fetched to say
that other militant organizations can take advantage of local
political environments to train, to conduct operations, that is
completely in the realm of possibility. And you don't have to have an
overarching al-Qaida connection for that to happen," she said.Many are
now waiting to see how the Bangladesh government handles the trials of
the 70 militants it arrested this month as a means of gauging its
commitment to fighting political violence and terror within its own
borders. It may be the key, some warn, to ensuring that Bangladesh is
not seen as the new haven for other militant organizations seeking
tocarry out agendas of their own.