The Amber Alert PC system is already patented technology. Patented in other countries and the USA under a diffrent name and inventor. So why is a select few states acting like they invented it.
It is every states responsibility to do a technology and patent search. The Patents have been around since 1999-2002. Some people call it E.A.RS. THE ALREADY INVENTED TECHNOLOGY PREAMBER LEGISLATION.
The Patented technology is called E.A.R.S. How simular are the alerts identical in every aspect one used fax, internet, cell phones and the technology exspands past amber alerts. The already invented technology is a utility patent. I don't know where they are trying to go with it but it looks like a bad idea. The inventor has plans to give exsclusive rights to homeland security. The amber alert should not try andincorporate other technology. ITS COPYRIGHT AND PATENT CLAIMS.
The new technnology is only for homeland security or the marshals service its not intended for the amber alert. The amber alert was a good idea but many questions remain was it patented technology. A patent search reveled simular technogy with the highway sighns. The question remains about class action and law suits or insurance claims. If you are to keep your eyes on the road at all times who is responsible if you look up at a sighn the goverment put up and endorses.
The driver can claim distraction. Anyway this is a can of worms that will not go away the inventor of E.A.R.S. will only deal with homeland security or the marshals the highway patrol is a function also. The inventor is a criminologist and a law enforcement agent.But AMW is in no way the inventor of the amber alert. The technology was in private hands NOA is a patent infringement also.
This goes to the patent abuse and hearings. The big corporations want to steal from many small patents and invent new stuff. The goverment and states have a right to review all contracts and projects for existing technology. A law can be deemed unconstituitional. We have many treaties with other countries and talking more treaties. The goverment needs protocol and so do states. To steal patents is corporate fraud and classfied as goverment fraud also.
The ENd
Full Version: Amber Alert Web Portal
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Judicial System > Judicial System Issues Archive
QUOTE(revenge @ May 6 2005, 05:18 PM)
The Amber Alert PC system is already patented technology. Patented in other countries and the USA under a diffrent name and inventor. So why is a select few states acting like they invented it.
It is every states responsibility to do a technology and patent search. The Patents have been around since 1999-2002. Some people call it E.A.RS. THE ALREADY INVENTED TECHNOLOGY PREAMBER LEGISLATION.
The Patented technology is called E.A.R.S. How simular are the alerts identical in every aspect one used fax, internet, cell phones and the technology exspands past amber alerts. The already invented technology is a utility patent. I don't know where they are trying to go with it but it looks like a bad idea. The inventor has plans to give exsclusive rights to homeland security. The amber alert should not try andincorporate other technology. ITS COPYRIGHT AND PATENT CLAIMS.
The new technnology is only for homeland security or the marshals service its not intended for the amber alert. The amber alert was a good idea but many questions remain was it patented technology. A patent search reveled simular technogy with the highway sighns. The question remains about class action and law suits or insurance claims. If you are to keep your eyes on the road at all times who is responsible if you look up at a sighn the goverment put up and endorses.
The driver can claim distraction. Anyway this is a can of worms that will not go away the inventor of E.A.R.S. will only deal with homeland security or the marshals the highway patrol is a function also. The inventor is a criminologist and a law enforcement agent.But AMW is in no way the inventor of the amber alert. The technology was in private hands NOA is a patent infringement also.
This goes to the patent abuse and hearings. The big corporations want to steal from many small patents and invent new stuff. The goverment and states have a right to review all contracts and projects for existing technology. A law can be deemed unconstituitional. We have many treaties with other countries and talking more treaties. The goverment needs protocol and so do states. To steal patents is corporate fraud and classfied as goverment fraud also.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------cENSORED i MUST ASK APROVAL FIRST i JUST READ THE RULES.
It is every states responsibility to do a technology and patent search. The Patents have been around since 1999-2002. Some people call it E.A.RS. THE ALREADY INVENTED TECHNOLOGY PREAMBER LEGISLATION.
The Patented technology is called E.A.R.S. How simular are the alerts identical in every aspect one used fax, internet, cell phones and the technology exspands past amber alerts. The already invented technology is a utility patent. I don't know where they are trying to go with it but it looks like a bad idea. The inventor has plans to give exsclusive rights to homeland security. The amber alert should not try andincorporate other technology. ITS COPYRIGHT AND PATENT CLAIMS.
The new technnology is only for homeland security or the marshals service its not intended for the amber alert. The amber alert was a good idea but many questions remain was it patented technology. A patent search reveled simular technogy with the highway sighns. The question remains about class action and law suits or insurance claims. If you are to keep your eyes on the road at all times who is responsible if you look up at a sighn the goverment put up and endorses.
The driver can claim distraction. Anyway this is a can of worms that will not go away the inventor of E.A.R.S. will only deal with homeland security or the marshals the highway patrol is a function also. The inventor is a criminologist and a law enforcement agent.But AMW is in no way the inventor of the amber alert. The technology was in private hands NOA is a patent infringement also.
This goes to the patent abuse and hearings. The big corporations want to steal from many small patents and invent new stuff. The goverment and states have a right to review all contracts and projects for existing technology. A law can be deemed unconstituitional. We have many treaties with other countries and talking more treaties. The goverment needs protocol and so do states. To steal patents is corporate fraud and classfied as goverment fraud also.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------cENSORED i MUST ASK APROVAL FIRST i JUST READ THE RULES.
QUOTE(revenge @ May 6 2005, 05:18 PM)
The Amber Alert PC system is already patented technology. Patented in other countries and the USA under a diffrent name and inventor. So why is a select few states acting like they invented it.
It is every states responsibility to do a technology and patent search. The Patents have been around since 1999-2002. Some people call it E.A.RS. THE ALREADY INVENTED TECHNOLOGY PREAMBER LEGISLATION.
The Patented technology is called E.A.R.S. How simular are the alerts identical in every aspect one used fax, internet, cell phones and the technology exspands past amber alerts. The already invented technology is a utility patent. I don't know where they are trying to go with it but it looks like a bad idea. The inventor has plans to give exsclusive rights to homeland security. The amber alert should not try andincorporate other technology. ITS COPYRIGHT AND PATENT CLAIMS.
The new technnology is only for homeland security or the marshals service its not intended for the amber alert. The amber alert was a good idea but many questions remain was it patented technology. A patent search reveled simular technogy with the highway sighns. The question remains about class action and law suits or insurance claims. If you are to keep your eyes on the road at all times who is responsible if you look up at a sighn the goverment put up and endorses.
The driver can claim distraction. Anyway this is a can of worms that will not go away the inventor of E.A.R.S. will only deal with homeland security or the marshals the highway patrol is a function also. The inventor is a criminologist and a law enforcement agent.But AMW is in no way the inventor of the amber alert. The technology was in private hands NOA is a patent infringement also.
This goes to the patent abuse and hearings. The big corporations want to steal from many small patents and invent new stuff. The goverment and states have a right to review all contracts and projects for existing technology. A law can be deemed unconstituitional. We have many treaties with other countries and talking more treaties. The goverment needs protocol and so do states. To steal patents is corporate fraud and classfied as goverment fraud also.
The ENd
It is every states responsibility to do a technology and patent search. The Patents have been around since 1999-2002. Some people call it E.A.RS. THE ALREADY INVENTED TECHNOLOGY PREAMBER LEGISLATION.
The Patented technology is called E.A.R.S. How simular are the alerts identical in every aspect one used fax, internet, cell phones and the technology exspands past amber alerts. The already invented technology is a utility patent. I don't know where they are trying to go with it but it looks like a bad idea. The inventor has plans to give exsclusive rights to homeland security. The amber alert should not try andincorporate other technology. ITS COPYRIGHT AND PATENT CLAIMS.
The new technnology is only for homeland security or the marshals service its not intended for the amber alert. The amber alert was a good idea but many questions remain was it patented technology. A patent search reveled simular technogy with the highway sighns. The question remains about class action and law suits or insurance claims. If you are to keep your eyes on the road at all times who is responsible if you look up at a sighn the goverment put up and endorses.
The driver can claim distraction. Anyway this is a can of worms that will not go away the inventor of E.A.R.S. will only deal with homeland security or the marshals the highway patrol is a function also. The inventor is a criminologist and a law enforcement agent.But AMW is in no way the inventor of the amber alert. The technology was in private hands NOA is a patent infringement also.
This goes to the patent abuse and hearings. The big corporations want to steal from many small patents and invent new stuff. The goverment and states have a right to review all contracts and projects for existing technology. A law can be deemed unconstituitional. We have many treaties with other countries and talking more treaties. The goverment needs protocol and so do states. To steal patents is corporate fraud and classfied as goverment fraud also.
The ENd
The author realized he can not give contact info to the inventor. But he will contact the moderators who he respects and they will say yes or no. I just got off the phone with the inventor of E.A.R.S. he wants investors in particular Dean And Gore but has no way to make contact. He wouldn't know where to start. He has no idea if they would be intrested. All he can do is cross his fingers and wish apon a star. He wishes MTV or Time warner would contact him anything. He has had a few offers but they are not worth what the technology is worth. Anyway make the dream happen.
Bye
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.