Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Bush 'turned blind eye to Iraq deals'
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Foreign Policy and National Defense > Foreign Policy & National Defense Issues Archive
nnrecrut
LONDON
17/05/05 - News and city section

Bush 'turned blind eye to Iraq deals'By Patrick Sawer, Evening Standard

George Galloway arrived in Washington today to rebuff accusations that he profited from Iraqi oil sales as a Senate investigation found that the US government turned a blind eye to millions of dollars of sanctions busting.

The Bush administration knew about the illegal oil sales and kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's regime but did nothing about them, according to a report from Democrats on a Senate committee.

The report found that US oil purchases accounted for 52 per cent of kickbacks paid to the regime in return for sales of cheap oil under the UN's food for oil programme - more than the rest of the world put together.

The scale of the shipments is understood to dwarf those alleged to have been made by UN staff and European politicians such as Galloway and the former

French minister Charles Pasqua.

Mr Galloway, the newlyelected MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, has demanded an apology from the Senate subcommittee-which has named him as a beneficiary of Iraqi oil allocations. Mr Galloway, who overturned a 10,000 majority to win the seat for the anti-war Respect party, arrived in Washington yesterday and immediately demanded an apology from the subcommittee for what he called their "schoolboy dossier" against him. He said: "It was full of holes, full of falsehoods and full of value judgments that are apparently only shared here in Washington.

"I have no expectation of justice. I come not as the accused but as the accuser. I am going to show just how absurd this report is."

The new report accuses the Bush government of failing to take action against a Texas oil company which facilitated payments of "at least $37 million in illegal surcharges to the Hussein regime".

It also states that the State Department and the US military agreed to the shipment of nearly eight million barrels of oil bought by Jordan outside the Oil For Food programme.

It was not clear whether the Democrats' report would be accepted by the Republicans on the committee. The Pentagon declined to comment.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Find this story at http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article...82087?version=1
©2005 Associated New Media
heritage
Congress Eyes U.S. Oil-For-Food Bungling

Updated 7:39 AM ET May 17, 2005
By NICK WADHAMS

http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/news?e=pr...8a4tfp00&src=ap

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - Whether smuggled to Jordan or sold to Russian politicians, millions of barrels of illicit Iraqi oil ultimately fueled the cars and heated the homes of ordinary Americans, according to a U.S. Senate subcommittee.

After accusing politicians from France, Britain and Russia of involvement in Saddam Hussein's oil-for-food scheme, the committee focused on alleged American complicity in a report released Monday night.

The report claimed that Washington looked the other way as Texas oil company Bayoil bought Iraqi crude and sold it to American refineries. As a member of the U.N. Security Council, the United States allowed Saddam to pocket billions of dollars smuggling oil to Jordan, Turkey and Syria, it said.

"We've got to look in the mirror at ourselves as well as point fingers at others," Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., told reporters in a conference call on Monday before the report was released.

The two issues were among several to be discussed at a day-long hearing Tuesday by the subcommittee of the U.S. Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, chaired by Minnesota Republican Norm Coleman.

Coleman's subcommittee has released three reports since Thursday exploring how Saddam made billions in illegal oil sales despite U.N. sanctions imposed in 1991 after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. British, French and Russian politicians took part, the committee claimed.

Among those scheduled to testify Tuesday was George Galloway, the outspoken British lawmaker whom Coleman's subcommittee has accused of taking vouchers under oil-for-food.

As he got off the plane in Washington on Monday night, Galloway again denied the allegations and said the evidence against him was forged.

"It's Mr. Coleman who's been all over the news and he's a lick-spittle, crazed neocon who is engaged in a witch hunt against all those he perceives to have betrayed the United States in their plan to invade and occupy Iraq," Galloway told Associated Press Television News.

The oil-for-food program, which ran from 1996-2003, was designed to let Saddam's government sell oil in exchange for humanitarian goods to help the Iraqi people cope with crippling U.N. sanctions.

But Saddam peddled influence by awarding favored politicians, journalists and others vouchers for oil that could then be resold at a profit. He also smuggled oil to Turkey, Jordan and Syria outside the program, often with the explicit approval of the United States and the rest of the U.N. Security Council.

Many of the allegations made by Coleman's subcommittee are not new. In April, for example, Bayoil USA owner David Chalmers was indicted in U.S. District Court for allegedly funneling kickbacks to Saddam. Chalmers has denied any wrongdoing.

But rarely had the allegations been spelled out with so much detail or scope. Coleman's investigators have interviewed former top Iraqi officials and businessmen, who provided a behind-the-scenes look at how Saddam's grand scheme worked.

Monday's documents, released by the minority Democrats on Coleman's subcommittee, studied two issues: Bayoil's involvement in oil-for-food and a single instance that saw Saddam's regime smuggle more than 7 million barrels of oil out of the Iraqi port of Khor al-Amaya, apparently with U.S. knowledge, in the weeks before the invasion in 2003.

The report found that Bayoil imported some 200 million barrels over two years starting in September 2000 and sold it to U.S. oil companies. That was at a time when Saddam was trying to tinker with the price of oil so that when he sold it, companies could be compelled to pay him kickbacks.

The report claimed that Bayoil paid "directly or indirectly" some $37 million in kickbacks to Saddam even at a time that the United States and other members of the council had realized what Saddam was doing and began ordering price hikes to quash the kickbacks scheme.

Bayoil then sold the crude to U.S. companies, though there is no evidence the companies knew about the kickbacks, the report said.

Chalmers' lawyer, Frank Spagnoletti, could not immediately be located for comment late Monday. The report said Bayoil officials had refused to cooperate with the investigation. But Chalmers himself has denied wrongdoing in court.

The committee singled out the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control, which the United Nations repeatedly warned about Bayoil's scheme. It cited an apparent misunderstanding in which U.S. authorities assumed the United Nations would monitor individual companies, while at the United Nations, oil-for-food officials thought that was the responsibility of national governments.

The report's focus on the single instance of oil smuggling, through Khor al-Amaya, was meant to illustrate how Saddam sold oil outside oil-for-food.

The committee cited an October report by U.S. arms inspector Charles Duelfer saying that while Saddam pocketed more than $225 million illegally under oil-for-food, he made some $8 billion in illegal oil sales outside the program.
heritage
Senator Norm Coleman got a public lashing by his British witness today who has been all over the news.

George Galloway, the outspoken British lawmaker whom Coleman's subcommittee has accused of taking vouchers under oil-for-food said that he did nothing wrong and the news said he won a liable lawsuit about this issue.

Coleman wouldn't name his "Iraqi sources", whom Galloway said probably are imprisoned and were forced to give up names.
TheRestofUs
It just never ends does it? They are desperate to cover up the wholesale grabbing of vast sums by their greedy allies. It's getting harder and harder.

Their problem is that these greedy croneys are getting very sloppy, and are being caught. This could bring them down. But I don't hold my breath anymore.
heritage
Here is another forum on this Galloway person.

http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/for...ST&f=16&t=29489
TheRestofUs
This MP Galloway is an amazingly articulate man. They trashed the wrong guy! I hope the people of Minnesota see this. I hope they recall Coleman!

Is C-Span going to re-air this?
heritage
Check the C-span TV schedule at http://www.c-span.org.

Coleman's hearing probably was on C-span 3 while Congress was in session. C-span 1 or 2 usually replays those hearings after Congress ends. .
TheRestofUs
I checked the C-Span television schedules and didn't see any reference to Galloway. Thanks for the link though, I'm sure they will re-air it. Did you'all say that the MSM aired it? Very Cool if so.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.