How the Democrats Can Win in 2008
If the Democrats want to win the 2008, they should enlist former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura as their candidate.
I know most Minnesota DFLers considered him an embarrassment. But that's because most MN DFLers are pseudo-progressive elitists. Many DFLers are more than happy to see taxes continue to rise because they already make way more than enough money. Those DFLers who are not well off are generally of another stripe: unionists and entitle-ists. Really they're the same, both expect a governing body to force others to pay them money or support them at a level that is much higher than they generally deserve, and which frequently provides them with a better standard of living than the people they serve (see Bob Smith's blog entry, ``Your servant that makes more than you do,'' for more info on that).
Unionism in private industry is shrinking at incredible rates, while unionism in government, schools, and other government-monopoly services remain quite strong. No wonder DFLers don't mind the stench of teachers' union money in their candidates' coffers-the rich DFLers think throwing money at schools will fix stuff, and if not they can afford private schools or moving to different neighborhoods with higher quality schools, meanwhile, poor DFLers generally approve of unions, even those that have interests that are diametrically opposed with their own interests.
I think it is fair to say that the teachers' union exists to protect and enrich teachers. This is why any union exists, to promote the interests of its members. This puts them into immediate conflict with the public, especially students and parents. I have nothing against paying teachers livable salaries and all that; I think everyone who participates in society should have their basic needs met. Further, most teachers are fabulous people who give a lot of their own time to the task of helping other people's children learn and grow. However, just because teachers may be great people doesn't mean that their union should just get whatever it asks for. But that's exactly what happens when their union funds the campaigns of DFL candidates. It is a conflict of interest.
Jesse is a Real Liberal
Anyway, back to Jesse Ventura and the Democrats. Jesse Ventura is a liberal. A real liberal. He is not a Bill Clinton pretend, liberal hick turned slick politician, nor a John Kerry , east coast, old money, liberal. Jesse Ventura is an actual social liberal.
Yes he has some conservative qualities. He is generally fiscally conservative. Jesse Ventura could easily win the hearts and minds of a lot of the "Red" voters out there simply because he was in the Navy, he was a wrestler, a sports announcer, he's a hunter, he's wealthy (meaning he is not going to spend a lot of time guilt-tripping anyone over their money), he not only campaigned on a tax refund, but delivered. So the libertarian conservatives should love this guy. It's only the social conservatives who might have trouble with him.
To Jesse's credit here is that he has actively promoted actual liberal social policies. He is solidly pro-choice, no friend of religion (even vetoed a Pledge law), has stated approval for legalizing prostitution, approves of medical marijuana (and I would guess he would gladly entertain the idea of decriminalizing beyond that), supports public transportation (Jesse is one of the main reasons we have a light rail train in Minneapolis today), and actively supports gay rights (even standing by one of his gay cabinet members who had something of a scandal). His administration was even amenable to public school funding, just not the teachers' union. He has stated opposition to trade sanctions with Cuba.
In short, the man is an incredible breath of fresh air. I would vote for him without a moment's hesitation. Whether I agreed with him or not, I felt knew where he stood on issues and felt that he would stick to his principles. He was a leader, not a poll follower. He was a man, not a politician.
Democrats Unwilling to Think Openly and Rationally?
Sadly, I'm guessing that most Democrats are closed-minded, small-minded people who are unwilling to enlarge their thinking to recognize opportunities like this. Jesse Ventura would probably accept a Democratic nomination for president, and he would certainly win with it. In fact, I can't think of a single person the Republicans could run against Jesse who would even come close to being able to beat him.
So far I've heard Dems suggesting Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Howard Dean (!!!), and John Kerry . And all I can say is: what are you people smoking that you don't have the courage and gumption to promote the legalization of?
Maybe Obama, but he's a young guy who will have only served 2/3rds of a Senate term by 2008, and so he'll essentially be running for President with two whole years in Washington under his belt. Ridiculous. Plus, he's a Senator, not Mayor, not Governor, not Vice President. He's nobody so far. And the person he beat in Illinois for this Senate seat wasn't exactly a challenge. And he's a Harvard lawyer. Not very inspiring. Maybe to the good folks in Illinois he's a great Senator, but he couldn't possibly win the Presidency in 2008. Look for him in 2016. Maybe.
In any case senators rarely go on to become President without first being VP or Governor or something. In fact, lawyers rarely go on to become President. Look at history:
W, business man, governor;
Clinton, lawyer, but also governor;
Bush, did serve in the House, but was also a business man, CIA director, vice president, ambassador to the UN, etc;
Reagan, actor and governor;
Carter, not a lawyer, but a Senator, then a governor, then a president;
Ford was a lawyer and in Congress, but he was not elected to be President, he was not even elected as a Vice President-he doesn't count;
Nixon, graduated law school, served in both the House and Senate, but also served as VP to a very strong president before losing and then winning the presidency;
LBJ was a teacher and in both houses of Congress, but he was also elected as Vice President and became President only because of an assassination;
JFK was an actual Senator, but not a lawyer-he also had a lot of TV appeal in the first major election to use TV;
Ike was a general in the Army;
Truman was a Senator, but became President the first time while he was VP, he was a lot of things, but never a lawyer;
FDR was a lawyer, but also governor of New York;
Hoover was a lot of things, including a cabinet member;
Coolidge was a Senator, but not when he ran for President, he was Governor of Massachusetts when he first went for the Oval Office, he had also been Lt. Governor and a Mayor;
Harding was a sitting Senator elected to the Presidency, but he was a publisher, not a lawyer;
Wilson was a professor and a governor before being elected President;
Taft was a skull and bones lawyer, but he was governor of the Phillipines and Secretary of War before his election;
Roosevelt was a businessman and VP, who became President after McKinley's assassination and then was elected in his own right later.
So I don't think Hillary or Obama or a Kerry re-run are even remotely good ideas. Obama might be okay if he does something else first. I myself might vote for Clinton for the heck of it, but I really don't think she would win.
Can't Beat Chimpy McFlightsuit?
What I do think is that the Dems should woo Ventura. They need to get over themselves and realize that they are losing the battle. In fact, they are barely even fighting the battle. That they could seriously lose an election to Chimpy McFlightsuit is astounding. The entire leadership of the Democratic party should be tossed out on its ear-baby with bathwater. That means completely sidelining anyone of the "serious" candidates in 2004 (Dean, Clark, etc) and the major players McAuliffe, Shrum, Clinton, etc.
Guys, it's time to "move on" and get some backbones and some candidates who also have backbones. Social liberals are begging you for it and you're not delivering. You're trotting out halfwits who move the party way to the right socially, and completely cave on financial issues. Clinton only got elected because Ross Perot split the conservative vote, heavily. Can you imagine what would have happened if Perot hadn't run? Twice? And things did not improve under Clinton in any way that was a result of his leadership. The areas he led on either imploded (i.e. health care) or were actually conservative issues in the first place (i.e. welfare reform). You need to run a leader, not just of a winning campaign, but of a social movement. And while he doesn't act like a social leader, Jesse Ventura is a strong-willed liberal.
If Ventura decides to run and does so on any ticket other than the Democratic ticket he will kill the Democrats chance to win in 2008. Moreso than Nader, Ventura has experience in politics and incredible name recognition. Unlike Nader, Ventura doesn't have a reputation as a stoddy old 60s liberal. While Ventura actually supports many of the same liberal social positions that Nader has been pushing, I think most Americans (even those supposed "values" voters) would go along with him because he stands up for himself instead of tailoring his message in focus group fashion. Even better, Ventura has been elected once already. In one of the most liberal states in the nation no less. If he can take a perennial blue state like Minnesota and someone like Arnold Schwarzeneggar can take California, I'm guessing Ventura could probably take the whole country.
Please, Democratic Party, work to bring Ventura into the game. With him you could not only win the next election, but you could change the course of the country in a very real way, a very positive way.
Do you want real change in America? Change for the better?
Are you concerned about privacy invasions, giant databases, and our civil liberties turning into door mats?
Are you becoming afraid of the Republicans intertwining church and state?
Are you disappointed with the Democrats "oh so close, but no cigar" repeat performances?
Do more social programs, increased spending, and increased deficits make you feel disenfranchised?
What happened to Bin Laden?
Jesse Ventura is one of the true
"last hopes" for America.
http://www.voters4ventura.com/ Check out this site and see why Jesse is the person for President in 2008.
Sign The Petition - Show your support for Ventura for President in 2008.
