Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Iran - Volume 2
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Foreign Policy and National Defense > Foreign Policy & National Defense Issues Archive
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Snuffysmith
Iran Moves to Curb Hard-Liners

By Karl Vick

ISTANBUL, Oct. 7 -- Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Shiite Muslim cleric who holds ultimate authority in Iran, has altered the country's power structure by granting a relatively moderate panel new authority to supervise an elected government increasingly dominated by religious hard-liners.

Khamenei expanded the authority of the Expediency Council, an appointive body whose longtime chairman, former president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, is a fixture of Iranian politics and invariably described as wily insider. Rafsanjani lost last June's presidential election, but Khamenei's new decree, made public Oct. 1, gives Rafsanjani at least nominal supervision over the administration put in place by the winner, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The council also was given supervisory authority over the Iranian parliament, despite the squawks of lawmakers who accused the council of a power grab. Previously, the council was only empowered to settle disputes between the parliament and the Guardian Council -- another, more influential appointive body -- and to advise Khamenei.

"The adjudication of the Expediency Council is the final word," council secretary Mohsen Rezai told reporters in Tehran, the capital, this week. "And even if other state sectors do not agree with it, it is the final word and they have to accept it."

The practical effect of the change remains to be seen. The structure of Iran's theocratic government is complex and its operations are opaque.

But analysts found significance in the timing of the change, which had been proposed to Khamenei years earlier. Coming now, the expansion of the Expediency Council's power was widely viewed as, at minimum, a gesture intended to restore some prestige to Rafsanjani. He played a key role in elevating Khamenei to the position of supreme religious leader after the 1989 death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the 1979 revolution that installed Iran's religious government.

Others also saw an effort to balance the rise of hard-liners who control Iran's elective branches of government, as well as the judiciary and the Guardian Council. Control of parliament shifted to conservatives last year in an election the Guardian Council closed off to anyone else.

Ahmadinejad took office in August after a more credible victory -- a landslide fueled by a populist economic appeal. But he has had a shaky start. His cabinet selections proved controversial, and his confrontational approach to critics of Iran's nuclear program has been questioned even in Tehran.

"This is more than symbolic. This is the leader saying, 'We're moving too far right,' " said Karim Sadjadpour, who follows Iran for the International Crisis Group, a research group based in Brussels. "I'm loath to call Rafsanjani moderate, but in the current context, he is a voice of moderation."

Iran's government is united in defending its long-secret nuclear program, which it insists is intended only to generate electricity. But foreign diplomats said Iran's cause was hurt by the strident tone of the address that Ahmadinejad, a novice at foreign relations, delivered at the United Nations last month. U.S. diplomats seized on it to successfully lobby the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency to refer Iran to the Security Council.

Rafsanjani, 71, appeared to join in the criticism of Ahmadinejad at Friday prayers a week ago in Tehran.

"You need diplomacy and not slogans," said Rafsanjani, who is both a cleric and a millionaire businessman. "This is the place for wisdom, the place for seeking windows that will take you to the objective."

Ahmadinejad's cabinet nominations also drew criticism, and some ridicule. Parliament rejected four of his choices, including the nominee for Iran's vital oil ministry. The candidate had claimed to have a doctorate from an American college that turned out to be an on-line degree.

"Ahmadinejad has already shown that he needs a lot of supervision," said a professional political analyst in Tehran, who asked not to be named because his employer had not authorized his remarks. "Just last week his government sent two 'double urgent' bills to the parliament. He gets so excited."

Parliament approved his choice for interior minister, Mustafa Pourmohammadi, only after grilling him on his tenure as a top official in the Intelligence Ministry in the mid-1990s, when its agents were executing government critics in their homes. Two other ministries are headed by veterans of Iran's security services, and five more by veterans of the Revolutionary Guards, whose influence in government has steadily grown in recent years.

"The new guys are from a relatively dark place in the Islamic republic," said Ray Takeyh, an analyst for the Council on Foreign Relations based in Washington.

Sadjadpour said generational politics appeared to play a role in expanding the powers of Rafsanjani's council. Along with Khamenei, 66, Rafsanjani lived through the trauma of the Islamic revolution's early years, when the broad-based uprising against the U.S.-backed monarch, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, soon splintered into bloody factional fighting. That was followed by a bloody eight-year war with Iraq.

"They go back three or four decades, and they've been through a lot together," Sadjadpour said. "I think Khamenei is tending domestically to his power base, and he does want to avert an international crisis."


Would you like to send this article to a friend? Go to
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/e...er=emailarticle
Snuffysmith
Iran Has 12 Strategic Cruise Missiles

DEBKAfile Military Report

March 20, 2005, 9:27 PM (GMT+02:00)





The Ukrainian prosecutor-general Svyatoslav Piksun created a major international flap Friday, March 18, when he admitted to the Financial Times that 18 X-55 strategic cruise missiles, also known as Kh-55, had been “exported” - 12 to Iran and 6 to China in 2001. He could not explain how the “significant leak” of technology from the former Soviet Union’s nuclear arsenal occurred, but said the missiles had been sold without nuclear warheads.

The X-55 has a ranged of 3,000 km and is capable of carrying 200 kiloton nuclear warheads. Launched from Su-24 long-range strike aircraft in the Iranian air force, it can put Japan, all of Russia and Israel within range. Piksun’s admission is the first official confirmation of the Ukrainian missile sale that was first made public last month by a Ukrainian parliament member.

Their acquisition heightens concerns about Iran’s nuclear weapons program. The US embassy in Kiev is “closely monitoring” the investigation and demands the findings be made public in full. The Japanese embassy echoed the demand.

DEBKAfile’s Moscow sources reveal that the Ukrainian shipment to Iran included radioactive materials for making “dirty bombs.”

According to DEBKAfile’s military sources, the 12 strategic cruise missiles place the strategic ratio between the Islamic Republic and Israel on a completely new level. Iran shares this asset with only two other world powers, the United States and Russia. This weapon is used for destroying known relatively fixed-position targets, such as Israel’s Dimona nuclear center and population centers. Its guidance system combines inertial-Doppler navigation and position correction based on in-flight comparison of terrain in targeted regions with images stored in the memory of its on-board computer. The propulsion system is a dual-flow engine located underneath the missile’s tail.

Possession of the Kh-55 makes Iran’s Shahab-3 or its projected Shahab-4 missile programs irrelevant. Tehran may have given them exposure as a red herring to distract attention from its high-profile missile asset.

The breakup of the Soviet Union left about 1,000 missiles in Ukraine’s arsenal, half of which were meant to be turned over to Russia in the 1990s and half destroyed under a US-funded disarmament program. The 18 sold under the table slipped through the cracks of this accord.

The previous government in Kiev arrested and charged a local businessman for the illegal exports and his trial is still underway, the Ukrainian prosecutor said, adding that two Russian businessmen were suspected of masterminding the sale, one of whom, Oleg Orlov, was arrested last July in Prague in response to a Ukrainian warrant. Under the new government that took office in January, SBU chief Alexander Turchinov has reopened the investigation.
theglobalchinese
Iran press fumes over UK claims BBC News
Iranian newspapers have been building up a head of steam over the past few days after Britain accused elements in Iran of involvement in fatal attacks against British forces in southern Iraq.
One illegal war was bad enough Tony, so don’t meddle in Iran Sunday Herald
Military team looks for proof of Iran's links with Iraq rebels Scotland on Sunday
IranMania News - United Press International - Christian Science Monitor - Times Online - all 310 related »
Snuffysmith
US Briefs On Alleged Iranian Nuclear Warhead Work: Diplomats
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzg.html

Vienna (AFP) Oct 9, 2005 - The United States has briefed key nations on intelligence that it says shows Iranian atomic weapons work, namely research on getting a missile warhead to explode at an altitude that would maximize the blast of a nuclear explosion, diplomats and analysts told AFP.
Snuffysmith
Iran Official Says US Incapable Of Going To War
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzh.html
Snuffysmith
Iran Softens Tone In Nuclear Stand-Off
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzi.html

Tehran (AFP) Oct 10, 2005 - Iran on Monday softened its tone amid a crisis over its disputed nuclear programme, with a senior national security official asserting the country had made a "strategic choice" to pursue negotiations.
Snuffysmith
Iran Must Obey Rules on Nuclear Program: Blair
(Reuters)
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle....&archived=False

Tuesday, October 11
Iran must obey international rules over its nuclear program and should not doubt the will of the international community to ensure it does so, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said on Tuesday.

Blair, due to hold talks on Iran soon with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, said Britain and the United States would continue to put pressure on Iran over its nuclear activities, which Washington says -- and Iran denies -- are a cover for making atomic bombs.

"The position of Europe and America has been the same on this. We will continue the pressure," Blair told a news conference.
Snuffysmith
Experts Predict US Attack on Iran :

Scott Ritter - ex of the US Marine Corps and former chief UN Weapons Inspector in Iraq - was unequivocal. Plans for an attack on Iran are being drawn up and acted upon “right now….as we speak”.
http://tinyurl.com/e39me
Snuffysmith
Iran's heritage deserves respect from America and Europe :

The greatness that was Persia continues to endure through the repeated turmoil of the Middle East
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,...1590719,00.html
theglobalchinese
US's Rice fails to win Russia backing on Iran ABC News
US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice failed on Saturday to win Russia's support for referring Iran to the UN Security Council should the Islamic republic refuse to resume talks over its suspected nuclear arms programs.
Russia: Considering Iran's nuclear issue within IAEA Xinhua
Rice fails to persuade Russia to move on Iran nuclear program USA Today
BBC News - IranMania News - Voice of America - Reuters.uk - all 535 related »
theglobalchinese
Iran sees no hurdle to resumption of talks with EU Tehran Times
Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid-Reza Asefi said here on Sunday that Iran sees no obstacle to cooperation with the European Union, represented by Germany, France, and Britain.
Russians gave aid with nukes: report Melbourne Herald Sun
Iran says wants nuclear talks, but no concessions ABC News
Aljazeera.com - Houston Chronicle - Malayala Manorama - Malaysia Star - all 670 related »
Snuffysmith
Military Action Against Iran Not On Agenda: British FM
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzl.html

London (AFP) Oct 16, 2005 - Military action against Iran is not on anyone's agenda, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said Sunday after a meeting with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Iran's controversial nuclear programme.
Snuffysmith
Iran Refuses To Return To Full Nuclear Suspension
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzm.html
Snuffysmith
Iran Must Return To Talks: US
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzn.html

Washington (AFP) Oct 17, 2005 - The White House said Monday that Iran must return to negotiations aimed at easing fears that Tehran is trying to get nuclear weapons or face possible UN Security Council sanctions.
Snuffysmith
Analysis: Iran-UK Ties Toward Freezing?
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzo.html
Snuffysmith
Are we going to war with Iran?

By Dan Plesch

The US army and marines are heavily committed in Iraq, but soldiers could be found if the Bush administration were intent on invasion. Donald Rumsfeld has been reorganising the army to increase front-line forces by a third. More importantly, naval and air force firepower has barely been used in Iraq. Just 120 B52 and stealth bombers could target 5,000 points in Iran with satellite-guided bombs in just one mission. It is for this reason that John Pike of globalsecurity.org thinks that a US attack could come with no warning at all.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10651.htm
Snuffysmith
Female firefighters find they can take the heat in Iran
The 11 members of the women-only squad are creating a model for cities
across the country. By Scott Peterson
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1019/p01s03-wome.html?s=hns
theglobalchinese
Arab League Holds Second Day of Talks with Iraqi Leaders Chosun Ilbo
Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa has held a second day of meetings in Baghdad with Iraqi leaders to help promote reconciliation efforts among Iraq's divided communities.
Arab League chief meets Kurdish leaders Aljazeera.net
Arab League chief extends Iraq visit United Press International
Bahrain News Agency - Arabic News - Daily Times - Xinhua - all 128 related »
Snuffysmith
Blair Warns Iran On Dangers Of Isolation From The West
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzt.html

London (AFP) Oct 24, 2005 - British Prime Minister Tony Blair warned Iran on Monday that the country would face "a much more difficult life" if it did not improve its relations with Western states.
Snuffysmith
Russia Renews Support For Iran Nuclear Program
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzu.html
Snuffysmith
U.S. Wants Russia to Push Iran on Nukes
(Judith Ingram, Associated Press)

Monday, October 24
The U.S. national security adviser met with Russia's foreign minister on Monday, as Washington pushes diplomatic efforts to confront Iran over its nuclear program. Iran's foreign minister held separate talks in the Russian capital. National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley met with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and other senior officials at the start of his two-day visit.

The United States has been trying to rally support for bringing Iran before the U.N. Security Council for possible economic penalties if it does not provide answers and allay fears about its nuclear program, which the U.S. says is a covert drive to build nuclear weapons.
Snuffysmith
Analysis: Iranian Agents In U.S?
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzv.html

Washington (UPI) Oct 25, 2005 - Iranian Intelligence agents have entered the United States to spread disinformation, according to the Iran Policy Committee, a group composed mostly of former U.S. government officials who are lobbying the Bush administration for regime change in Teheran.
Snuffysmith
Iranian Bomb Could Lead Others To 'Reconsider Options': Think-Tank
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzw.html
Snuffysmith
Iran: Ahmadinejad: Wipe Israel off map:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has openly called for Israel to be wiped off the map.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/15E...3CE0E9957EA.htm
Snuffysmith
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/26/internat...26cnd-iran.html

Iran's President Says Israel Must Be 'Wiped Off the Map'

By NAZILA FATHI
Published: October 26, 2005
TEHRAN, Oct. 26 - Iran's new hard-line president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, told a group of students at an anti-Israel event today that Israel must be "wiped off the map" and that attacks by Palestinians will destroy it, the Iranian student news agency, ISNA, reported.

He was speaking to an audience of about 4,000 student at a program called The World without Zionism, in preparation for an annual anti-Israel demonstration held on the last Friday of the holy month of Ramadan.

His tone was reminiscent of that of the early days of Iran's Islamic revolution in 1979. Iran and Israel have been bitter enemies since then, and anti-Israel slogans are common at rallies.

Senior officials had avoided provocative language over the past decade, but Mr. Ahmadinejad appears to be taking a more confrontational tone.

He said in his remarks today that the issue of a Palestinian state would be resolved only when Palestinians took control of all their lands.

"The establishment of Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world," Mr. Ahmadinejad said, the news agency reported. "The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of the war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land."

Referring to comments by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the Islamic revolution, Mr. Admadinejad said, "As the imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map."

The remarks brought swift reaction in Israel and in some Western capitals.

Mark Regev, spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, said Mr. Ahmadinejad and the Hamas leader, Mahmoud Zahar, "speak openly about destroying the Jewish state ... and it appears the problem with these extremists is that they followed through on their violent declarations with violent actions," The Associated Press reported.

"I think it reconfirms what we have been saying about the regime in Iran," the White House press secretary, Scott McClellan, told reporters in Washington. according to The A.P. "It underscores the concerns we have about Iran's nuclear intentions."

France's foreign minister, Philippe Douste-Blazy, learning of Mr. Admadinejad's comments, said "I condemn them very forcefully," adding that he will summon Iran's ambassador to Paris to ask for an explanation, Agence France-Presse reported.

The tone of Mr. Ahmadinejad's predecessor, Mohammad Khatami, had differed markedly, with Mr. Khatami proposing a dialogue among civilizations and pursuing a policy of détente.

At the funeral of Pope John Paul II in April, Mr. Khatami was seated close to the Israeli president, Moshe Katsav, who said he shook hands with Mr. Khatami and chatted briefly. Mr. Katsav was born in the Iranian city of Yazd, which is Mr. Khatami's home town, and speaks fluent Persian.

However, despite media photos that showed the two men standing next to one another, Mr. Khatami denied the account of the encounter after he returned to Iran.

Mr. Ahmadinejad also called Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip a trick, and said Gaza is part of Palestinian territories and the withdrawal was aimed at convincing the Islamic states to acknowledge Israel.

"Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury," Mr. Ahmadinejad said. Any Islamic leader "who recognizes the Zionist regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the Islamic world."
Snuffysmith
Iranian's 'Wipe Israel Off Map' Words Prompt Sharp World Response
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzx.html

Paris, France (AFP) Oct 26, 2005 - Widespread condemnation greeted remarks Wednesday by Iran's president that Israel should be wiped of the map, with Jerusalem seeing Teheran as a "clear and present danger" and Washington renewing concern about the Islamic Republic's nuclear aims.
Snuffysmith
Tehran warns against 'interference' in nuclear talks
http://www.spacewar.com/2005/051026172332.mbeffw1w.html
Snuffysmith
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/051026/1/3vykm.html

Thursday October 27, 5:56 AM

Iran sheltering Bin Laden sons and Al-Qaeda members: report


Iran is providing refuge to around 25 leading members of the Al-Qaeda terror group including three of Osama bin Laden's sons, a German magazine reported.

Cicero magazine said Saad, Mohammed and Othman bin Laden as well as other Al-Qaeda members from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, north Africa and Europe were living in and around Tehran under the protection of Iran's Republican Guard.

The magazine quoted a "top-ranking Western secret service agent" as saying the Al-Qaeda members were free to move around.

"They are not under arrest or house arrest," the unnamed source told the respected monthly Cicero. "They can do what they like."

Saad bin Laden, who is around 25, is thought to have played a key financial and logistical role in several Al-Qaeda attacks and is on a US most-wanted list.

Osama bin Laden is believed to have more than 20 sons by several wives.

The article was written by journalist Bruno Schirra.

Cicero and Schirra made national headlines in Germany last month when police raided the magazine's offices and Schirra's Berlin home after he wrote a story alleging links between Iran and Al-Qaeda's frontman in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

The police were searching for evidence to identify Schirra's sources after he quoted classified German documents in that story.

Interior Minister Otto Schily was forced to appear before a parliamentary committee to explain his order to carry out the raid.

Cicero was launched in March 2004 and describes itself as a "magazine of political culture".
lazyboy
Oct 26 05
Iran Daily

At 'The World Without Zionism' conference Mahmoud Almadinejad the President of Iran is quoted as saying: 'The world arrogant powers founded the Zionist regime in the heart of the Muslim world as a base for implementing their expansionist intentions...Since the issue of Palestine is a key matter facing the Muslim world, a particular group cannot declare their views in this respect behind closed doors.' He referred to the Zionist regime's recent withdrawal from the Gaza Strip as a trick noting that Gaza is part of Palestinian territory and the withdrawal is meant to make other Muslim states acknowledge the Zionist regime of Israel. Pointing to the evil attempts of the U S and Israel to sow discord among warring forces in Palestine and other parts of the Muslim world, Ahmadineijad siad attempts were aimed at forcing Muslims to acknowledge the existence of Israel.

EUROPE ATTACKED IRAN IN THE 1980s WAR - THROUGH SADDAM HUSSEIN

130,000 Iranian families still suffer from Saddam's Poison Gas. Reza Aqnouri announced that Iranian war veterans are planning to file a lawsuit against the BRITISH government for its role in PROVIDING SADDAM WITH CHEMICAL WEAPONS. He also said Britain must apologize to the Iranian nation and pay compensation to the victims' families. The statistics are based on WHO records. (World Health Organization) He also said the German Government has officially admitted its role in supplying chemical weapons to Saddam's regime. Aqanouri is from the center for Commemorating Martyrs and Victims of Chemical Weapons.

There are four other European countries, which the Center believes helped Saddam acquire these weapons during the war, he said, but declined to name them until the investigations are complete.
Snuffysmith
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?artic...rnational_news/

Russia launches Iran's first satellite

Moscow, Russian Federation



27 October 2005 11:22

Russia put Iran's first ever satellite into space on Thursday, as a Kosmos-3M rocket blasted off from the northwestern Plesetsk launch site carrying one Russian and seven foreign devices, the Russian space agency said.

The launcher successfully took off at 0652 GMT carrying a Russian military Mozhayets-5 satellite, an Iranian Sina-1, a Chinese China-DMC, a British Topsat, a European Space Agency SSETI Express, a Norwegian NCube, a German UVE-1 and a Japanese XI-V, the agency said in a statement.

The Iranian press has described the satellite as being for telecommunications and research purposes.

Iranian officials have repeatedly said they were on the verge of seeing their first satellite launched. In July, former deputy communications minister Hassan Shafti said a telecommunications satellite codenamed "Mesbah" (Lantern) would be launched this year.

He said that out of five Iranian satellites planned for construction, three are to be launched over the next three years.

Iran has been making continued progress in ballistics, a source of concern in the West along with the country's nuclear programme. - Sapa-AFP
Snuffysmith
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid...icle%2FShowFull

JPost.com » Israel » Article


Oct. 27, 2005 1:13 | Updated Oct. 27, 2005 9:00
Russia says Iran not a nuclear threat
By HERB KEINON


Significant Israeli-Russian differences over Iran, Hamas and Hizbullah emerged during talks Wednesday between Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom.

Lavrov arrived Tuesday for two days of talks in Israel and the Palestinian Authority. After meeting Shalom he traveled to Ramallah for talks with PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas. He is scheduled to meet Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on Thursday.

The differences of opinion regarding Iran became apparent at a joint Shalom-Lavrov press conference in Jerusalem.

While Shalom said Israel believed Iran would become a "clear and present" nuclear danger in some six months, Lavrov said Russia had not received information from either the International Atomic Energy Commission or any intelligence services supporting this position. He called on Israel to present Russia with these facts if it had them.

"As I told Silvan Shalom, if our Israeli friends have this information, if they have these facts, we would be the first interested to find out about it," Lavrov said. "We are taking this very seriously and would be the last one to be lenient about violations of the nonproliferation regime."

One diplomatic official in Jerusalem said the Israeli-Russian discrepancies over Iran's threat had to do with the question of when Iran would be considered a clear and present danger. While Israel believed this point would be reached when Iran obtained all the know-how needed to develop a nuclear bomb, Russia believed that Teheran would only be a clear and present danger when it was well on the way to building the bomb, the official said.

While Israel and the US are interested in seeing the Iranian question taken to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions as soon as possible, Lavrov made it clear that Moscow was in no great hurry.

"We rely on the professional assessment of the International Atomic Energy Agency," he said. "The agency is working there, the agency has a mandate to verify all questions which emerged during past activities around Iran that were not reported, and the agency has the mandate to find out whether there are signs of a secret, military nuclear program. This is being reported by the agency to the governing board.

"The agency is making progress; it closed some of the issues of the past and continues to work on the remaining questions. We can only rely on the professional assessments of the agency. We have to wait for the next report of the IAEA," Lavrov said.

The differences on Hamas and Hizbullah did not come out in the open at the press conference, but were present during the meeting.

According to diplomatic officials, when Shalom said the international community must keep Hamas from gaining legitimacy, Lavrov compared Hamas with Hizbullah, which Russia believes has a legitimate political wing.

When Lavrov said Russia's ambassador to Lebanon met with a Hizbullah leader in the summer, Shalom asked how Russia would feel if Israel's ambassador to Russia would meet with a representative of Chechnyan terrorists. Lavrov did not reply.

Russia, according to Israeli officials, believes that organizations like Hamas and Hizbullah can eventually be brought "into the fold" and convinced to give up their terrorists ways.

Lavrov, during his meeting with Shalom, pointed to the IRA in Northern Ireland as an example of how a terrorist organization could transform itself. The difference, Shalom rebutted, was that the IRA never sought the destruction of England.

Another area of disagreement between Russia and Israel had to do with the UN report on Syrian involvement in the February assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri.

Shalom, at the press conference, said Israel believes "strong action must be taken by international community to ensure that Syria's interference in Lebanon and support of terror against Israel is brought to an end. Russia's position on this will be crucial."

Although Israel has taken a low profile on this matter, it is believed to be in favor of sanctions against Syria if it did not cooperate fully with the UN investigation.

However, Mikhail Kamynin, a Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman accompanying Lavrov, was quoted by Inter-Fax as saying that "a resolution of the Security Council on the investigation of the murder of Lebanese ex-prime minister Rafik Hariri should be just. It should confirm the impartial character of the investigation done. Russia opposes sanctions against Syria. We shall do our best for preventing attempts to impose sanctions on Syria."

On another matter of concern to Israel, Russian arms sales to Syria, Lavrov told Shalom that Russia would not sell Syria weapons that would upset the current strategic balance in the region.

Prior to his meeting with Shalom, Lavrov met with President Moshe Katsav and focused on the Palestinians.

He reiterated Russian President Vladimir Putin's admiration for Sharon's single-mindedness with regard to Israel's pullout from the Gaza Strip, and said Russia was investing significant efforts through the Quartet and via its bilateral relations in keeping the peace process on track.

However, Lavrov said he feared the momentum generated by the disengagement plan would dissipate and the opportunity that it seemed to promise would be lost.

Under the circumstances it was difficult to remain optimistic, Katsav said. If Abbas was unable to meet the conditions for peace, the whole process could drag on for another decade, he added.

Katsav and Lavrov also discussed matters relating to Iran and Syria and anti-Semitism in Russia. Lavrov said Putin was determined to eradicate all manifestations of anti-Semitism in Russia, and had demanded that the full force of the law be implemented in this regard.

Greer Fay Cashman contributed to this report.
Snuffysmith
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?ed...rticle_id=19662


Western nations condemn Iran over remarks on Israel
EU describes comments as 'despicable' and 'unacceptable'


Compiled by Daily Star staff
Friday, October 28, 2005


Iran was hit by a barrage of world condemnation Thursday after its hard-line president called for Israel to be "wiped off the map," but the clerical regime struck back with yet more verbal attacks against the Jewish state. Israel called for Iran to be suspended from the UN over President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's remarks and the Palestinian Authority condemned the comments.

Speaking at the end of an EU summit, Blair said he felt "a real sense of revulsion"by Ahmadinejad's remarks.

"If they continue down this path, then people are going to believe that they are a real threat to our world security and stability," he said.

In an apparent reference to the U.S., Blair said "we will have discussions with our main allies over the next few days" on how to respond.

Earlier, the EU described the comments as "despicable and unacceptable" and "inconsistent with any claim to be a mature and responsible member of the international community."

Blair speculated that some members of the Iranian regime probably thought that the rest of the world has been "sufficiently distracted" with other issues to notice what it was doing and saying.

French President Jacques Chirac condemned the comments as "senseless and irresponsible."

Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat rejected the remarks. "We have recognized the state of Israel and we are pursuing a peace process with Israel ..."

Iran's ambassadors to Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands were summoned by those countries' respective Foreign Ministries to hear official protests.

A statement from Premier Ariel Sharon's office quoted him as saying: "A country that calls for the destruction of another people cannot be a member of the United Nations."

"Such a country that has nuclear weapons is a danger, not only to Israel and the Middle East, but also to Europe," he said in a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

Lavrov said the comments would give powers seeking to halt Iran's nuclear program more arguments to refer Tehran to the Security Council.

Lavrov said Russia has summoned the Iranian ambassador in Moscow to clarify Ahmadinejad's comments.

EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana also spoke out against Ahmadinejad's statement, but stopped short of calling for Iran to be suspended from the UN.

"Iran is a member of the United Nations," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said. "What I think we would encourage instead is Iran to start behaving in a responsible manner as a member of the international community."

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan expressed dismay about the remarks and reminded all member states Israel is a long-standing UN member "with the same rights and obligations as every other member."

Iran, however, was unrepentant, confirming its dramatic shift to the right that came with Ahmadinejad's shock election win in June.

The spokesman of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Sayyed Massoud Jazihiri, backed up Ahmadinejad by describing Israel as a "cancerous tumor."

He said the West "was right to be afraid, because two decades ago when the Imam [Khomeini] called for Israel to be wiped off the map they thought it was a slogan, but as time passes we are seeing signs of unity in the Islamic world."

"We have no doubts that at the end of the road, the victory of Muslims and the defeat of Israel is inevitable," Jazihiri said.

Iran's Foreign Ministry

also ordered its diplomats to lodge official protests over Europe's attitude toward "Zionist crimes".

"In protest at the exacerbation of the Zionist regime's crimes and its suppression of the Palestinian nation, Iran's embassies in Western countries were instructed to convey Iran's strong protest to European governments for their indifference toward the issue," the Foreign Ministry said.

But the Iranian Embassy in Paris said Iran had "no hostility" toward Jews. - Agencies
Snuffysmith
Diplomacy On Iran's Nuclear Program To Continue: Analysts
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzzc.html

Vienna, Austria (AFP) Oct 27, 2005 - The Iranian president's call for Israel to be "wiped off the map" is a blow to international talks over Iran's nuclear program but does not mean Tehran necessarily faces UN reprisals, diplomats and analysts told AFP Thursday.
Snuffysmith
Politics & Policies: Iran A Clear Danger
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzz.html

-
Snuffysmith
Moscow Condemns Iran, But Says Nukes Cooperation To Continue
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzza.html
Snuffysmith
Outside View: Russia Mediates Iran Nukes
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzzb.html
Snuffysmith
U.K. Warns Iran Over Israel Threat
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzy.html
Snuffysmith
Iran May Be 'Six Months' From Nuclear Bomb: Israeli FM
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzzd.html
Snuffysmith
Hard-Line Iran Could Be Seen As 'Real Threat': Blair
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzze.html
Snuffysmith
http://www.wpherald.com/storyview.php?Stor...27-121401-9887r

Iran: Clear and present danger
By Claude Salhani
UPI International Editor
Published October 27, 2005


WASHINGTON -- Apprehension over hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's election to the presidency of the Islamic republic was justified by his call on Wednesday for Israel to be "wiped off the map."

Running on a populist vote, Ahmadinejad, backed by Supreme leader Ali Khamenei, much to the detriment of the more experienced and more moderate former president, Hashemi Rafsanjani, won the elections in a landslide victory last June.


Israel's Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom said Tehran's regime presented "a clear and present danger," and Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shimon Peres called on the international community to react and expel Iran from the United Nations.

Similar calls of distress over the Iranian president's quasi declaration of war on the Jewish state were echoed in numerous capitals around the world.

The British Foreign Office described Ahmadinejad's comments as "deeply disturbing and sickening." French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy summoned Iran's ambassador to the Quai d'Orsay, the French foreign ministry, demanding an explanation.

The White House reiterated Washington's growing concerns over Tehran's nuclear ambitions, no doubt encouraging those calling for regime change in Tehran to up the ante. In Israel, similar concerns were echoed by Shalom who said, "Iran is trying to buy time ... so it can develop a nuclear bomb."

Ahmadinejad's comments were made at a conference in Tehran titled "The World without Zionism," attended by some 3,000 students who chanted "Death to Israel" and "Death to America." As the French say, "Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.'

"As the Imam said, 'Israel must be wiped off the map,'" said Ahmadinejad, referring to Iran's late revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Addressing students at the conference, Ahmadinejad said, "To those who doubt, to those who ask is it possible, or those who do not believe, I say accomplishment of a world without America and Israel is both possible and feasible."

A veteran of the Revolutionary Guards, Ahmadinejad took office in August amid speculation he might have participated in the storming of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979, and the taking of U.S. diplomats as hostages for 444 days. Former hostages have said they recognized Ahmadinejad as one of the student leaders who frequently came to the embassy to question the detained diplomats.

Analysts see Ahmadinejad's outrageous statement as nothing new, really, but rather more of a return to rhetoric of the early days of the Iranian revolution when the ayatollahs openly called for the Muslim world to act against Israel, which it called "Little Satan," and the United States, who was referred to as "Great Satan" -- Shaitan Bazorg, in Farsi.

Khomeini first called for Israel's eradication in 1979, shortly after coming to power.

Ahmadinejad's call to "wipe Israel off the map" raises the ante in Iran's negotiation over its nuclear policy with the EU-3 -- Britain, France and Germany -- who all reacted strongly to the Iranian president's statements.

Ahmadinejad's declaration will give fodder -- and renewed hope -- to opponents of the Tehran regime, many of who are urging the Bush administration to recognize the emerging threat posed by Iran's theocratic leadership and to adopt a firm policy aimed at changing the current regime.

Iran, states the Iran Policy Committee, a U.S. lobby group pushing hard for regime change, sees the Islamic republic as posing six threats to American interests and ideals. The group points out the following:

-- Iran's drive to acquire nuclear weapons.

-- Iran's continuing support for and involvement with terrorist networks such as Palestinian Islamist groups and Lebanon's Hezbollah, which Iran supports financially and militarily.

-- Publicly stated opposition to the Arab-Israel peace process.

-- Iran's disruptive role in Iraq.

-- Iran's expansionist radical ideology.

-- Denial of basic human rights to its own population.

While some observers may see the Iranian president's pugnacious statement as simple rhetoric, such declarations by a sitting head of state leaves room for concern in more than one way.

First it shows Ahmadinejad's government is far from mature, representing a danger for a country wishing to acquire weapons of mass destruction.

Second, it indicates the existence of severe rifts between Ahmadinejad and the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

"Contrary to most predictions, the victory of Ahmadinejad, following the rout of reformists in February's legislative elections, has not led to a 'homogenization' of power in the country," said veteran Iranian journalist Safa Haeri, from Paris.

"Ahmadinejad's performance on Wednesday puts Iran firmly on the path of confrontation," writes Haeri.

"The danger of such a radical statesman is that by knotting religious beliefs with the nuclear issue, it makes for an explosive issue that will explode in the face of all Iranians," Haeri quotes an Iranian analyst in Asia Times Online.

"Ahmadinejad's statement would certainly strengthen the international consensus against Iran."

Indeed, it goes without saying now that Iran will be perceived as a pariah state at the United Nations. Whether it will stop there remains in doubt.
Snuffysmith
http://www.wpherald.com/storyview.php?Stor...27-080654-5178r

Iran leader: Israel will be wiped off the map
By Joshua Mitnick
The Washington Times
Published October 27, 2005


RAMALLAH, West Bank -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad yesterday predicted a wave of Palestinian attacks that would erase Israel "from the face of the Islamic world," just hours before a suicide bomber killed five Israelis in a marketplace.

The attack, which wounded about 30, also made a mockery of a major speech by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who appealed in Ramallah yesterday for an end to attacks that he said were undermining attempts to establish a Palestinian state.


Iran's firebrand president called for Israel's destruction at a conference in Tehran titled "The World Without Zionism."

"There is no doubt that the new wave in Palestine will soon wipe off this disgraceful blot from the face of the Islamic world," state-run television quoted Mr. Ahmadinejad as telling a group of students. "Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury, [while] any [Islamic leader] who recognizes the Zionist regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the Islamic world."

The appeal by Mr. Abbas for an end to Palestinian violence was brushed off by West Bank militants interviewed by The Washington Times. They said they consider Mr. Abbas too weak a political figure to end the attacks.

Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said the Iranian president and Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar "speak openly about destroying the Jewish state ... and it appears the problem with these extremists is that they followed through on their violent declarations with violent actions."

In Washington, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the speech "reconfirms what we have been saying about the regime in Iran. ... It underscores the concerns we have about Iran's nuclear intentions."

Hours after Mr. Ahmadinejad spoke, a blast ripped through an open-air market in the northern Israeli city of Hadera, threatening to destabilize a nine-month-old pause in violence between Israel and the Palestinians.

Witnesses said the explosion, the first in an Israeli city since the army's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip last month, threw bodies through the air, overturned produce stalls and shattered nearby windows.

The extremist group Islamic Jihad took responsibility for the bombing, carried out by a 20-year-old Palestinian blacksmith, and said it was retaliation for the killing of one of its top chiefs in the West Bank this week.

The attack was a slight to Mr. Abbas, who had addressed the Palestinian parliament in Ramallah in the morning about the need for law and order in the West Bank and Gaza.

During the address, Mr. Abbas rapped the podium in frustration at hecklers who suggested that members from the militant group Hamas had been justified in launching rocket attacks into Israel last month.

Mr. Abbas said militant groups could not say they are contributing to the relative calm with Israel -- which has broad support, according to Palestinian opinion polls -- while acting on their own to retaliate for Israel's military offensives.

"There is no country in the world" where armed groups act on their own in the name of the state, he said.

The remarks, however, did nothing to satisfy Israeli officials. Public Security Minister Gideon Ezra said on Israeli radio, "The Palestinian Authority talks, but it doesn't do anything."

"The Palestinian Authority says it can't do anything, but that's not acceptable. The PA knows the identity of the heads of the [militant] organizations, but it's not doing anything."

The Palestinian Authority's plan to disarm militant groups begins with co-opting gunmen associated with its own Fatah party.

The gradualist approach assumes that once Mr. Abbas reins in armed groups loyal to his party, he will have more clout to confront Islamic militant opposition groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia told the parliament that the government needs to control Fatah's Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade by absorbing it into the Palestinian security service. Like Hamas and Islamic Jihad, the brigade attacks Israelis with suicide bombers.

Training camps for brigade members are scheduled to begin next month, but the Fatah militias are divided over whether to join the Palestinian security forces.

"I will not be absorbed," said an Al Aqsa fugitive from Ramallah, who used the pseudonym Abu Ikhmeed.

"Many of us don't trust the political echelon. They come and talk to us while they talk to Israel as it continues to kill."

Abu Ikhmeed, however, acknowledged that the majority of brigade members want to join the security forces, but that they could not be expected to obey the orders of Palestinian commanders who are viewed as weak and corrupt.
theglobalchinese
Iran says not threatening attack on Israel ABC News
Iran said on Saturday it stood by its U.N. commitments not to use violence against another country, responding to international criticism over remarks by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vowing to destroy Israel. "The Islamic Republic of Iran is committed to its U.N. charter commitments," a Foreign Ministry statement read. "It has never used force against a second country or threatened the use of force."
Iranian leader joins huge anti-Israel rally Seattle Times
Demonstrators fill streets of Iran Indianapolis Star
CNN International - Bloomberg - New York Times - IranMania News - all 2,020 related »
theglobalchinese
Lawmaker Condemn Iranian President's Statement on Israel Voice of America
The US House of Representatives has approved a resolution condemning the statement by Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad calling for the destruction of Israel.
Iran pledges peace in war of words Melbourne Herald Sun
Iran says not threatening attack on Israel Reuters.uk
Ha'aretz (subscription) - CNN International - Seattle Times - Bangkok Post - all 1,946 related »
Snuffysmith
Analysis: Iran President Attacks Israel
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzzg.html

London (UPI) Oct 28, 2005 - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent call for Israel to be "wiped off the map" has enraged much of the international community and heightened fears that Tehran's nuclear intentions are military in nature. However opinions are divided as to whether his comments should be seen as an indication of a growing threat to the West.
Snuffysmith
Iran Won't Return To Nuclear Freeze: Ahmadinejad
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzzh.html
Snuffysmith
Iran Says Not Afraid Of War, Sanctions
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzzj.html

Tehran (AFP) Oct 31, 2005 - Iran is unfazed by the threat of war or sanctions over its disputed nuclear programme and mounting international pressure has only hardened its resolve, a senior official said Monday.
Snuffysmith
Analysis: A Pre-Staged Crisis?
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzzi.html
Snuffysmith
Outside View: Ominously Misguided
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iran-05zzzzzk.html
Snuffysmith
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/hirsch.php?articleid=7861


November 1, 2005
The Real Reason for
Nuking Iran
Why a nuclear attack is on the neocon agenda
by Jorge Hirsch
The strategic decision by the United States to nuke Iran was probably made long ago. Tactics adjust to unpredictable events as they unfold.

There was such an event last week, when Iran's president declared that Israel must be "wiped off" the map. The surprise was not the statement, which was an often-repeated quote by the late Ayatollah Khomeini, directed at a domestic student audience. What was surprising was both the timing (amid discussions about whether Iran should be allowed to enrich uranium) and the relatively low-key U.S. response. Tony Blair expressed "revulsion," Chirac was "profoundly shocked," the European Union in a joint statement "condemned [it] in the strongest terms." Instead, Bush was quiet.

White House Spokesman Scott McClellan commented, "It underscores the concerns we have about Iran's nuclear intentions," and the usually vociferous U.S. ambassador to the UN John Bolton only said that Ahmadinejad's remarks about Israel were "pernicious and unacceptable." Those are uncharacteristically mild statements for this administration in the face of such a provocative statement by Iran against one of the U.S.' closest allies. Why?

Because Iran's intended underlying message to the U.S., which was ill-timed only in appearance, was: If you nuke us, the world will know that you did it because Iran supports the Palestinian cause.

Instead, it is in the U.S.' interests to de-emphasize any suggestion to that effect, hence its low-key response. Because nuking Iran for threatening Israel will inflame the Arab world and will not be acceptable to our European allies nor even to the American public. There are many other justifications that the Western world and the American public will find more acceptable, and these will be emphasized by the Bush administration at the right moment.


Iran "is determined to get nuclear weapons deliverable on ballistic missiles that it can then use to intimidate not only its own region but possibly to supply to terrorists." (John Bolton, Oct. 15, 2005)
"We cannot let Iran, a leading sponsor of international terrorism, acquire the most destructive weapons and the means to deliver them to Europe, most of central Asia and the Middle East, or beyond." (John Bolton, June 24, 2004)
"[S]yria and Iran … share the goal of hurting America. … State sponsors like Syria and Iran have a long history of collaboration with terrorists…." (George Bush, Oct. 6, 2005)
The 9/11 Commission determined that al-Qaeda had long-standing and strong ties to Iran, for example that "senior al-Qaeda operatives and trainers traveled to Iran to receive training in explosives." (By contrast, it found no ties between al-Qaeda and Iraq).
Iran was responsible for the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing, where 19 Americans were killed and 372 wounded, according to a June 2001 indictment by the U.S. attorney general. According to the 9/11 Commission, al-Qaeda may also have been involved.
Hezbollah, a terrorist group tied to Iran, carried out the suicide bombing in Beirut that killed 241 U.S. Marines in 1982. Iran was directly involved, according to a ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth in May 2003.
The real reason for nuking Iran, however, is none of the above. It was spelled out with surprising candor in the Pentagon draft document "Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations" [.pdf] as one of several possible reasons geographic combatant commanders may request presidential approval for use of nuclear weapons:

"To demonstrate U.S. intent and capability to use nuclear weapons to deter adversary use of WMD."

Yes, you read it right: The U.S. is prepared to break a 60-year-old taboo on the use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries – not because the survival of the country is at stake, not because the lives of many Americans or allies are at stake – just to demonstrate that it can do it.

The U.S. has maintained for some time now that it reserves the right to respond with nuclear weapons to attacks or intended attacks with WMD, and that it intends to use nuclear weapons to destroy underground enemy facilities. It is argued that such statements have deterrent value, and that maintaining ambiguity as to what might trigger a U.S. nuclear attack deters countries from pursuing military initiatives that are contrary to U.S. interests.

Nonsense. Those statements have no deterrent value because no one in his or her right mind would believe that the greatest democracy in the world would do such a thing.

Unless the U.S. demonstrates, by actually doing it once, that it is indeed prepared to do so.

How do you create the conditions to perform such a demonstration and avoid immediate universal condemnation?


You declare Iran to be the second member of the "axis of evil."
You start a "global war on terror."
You invade the first member of the axis (Iraq) and put 150,000 U.S. troops at the doorstep of the second member, in harm's way – not enough troops to invade Iran, nor to prevent an Iranian invasion of Iraq after Iran is attacked.
You strike Iran's facilities, using conventional and nuclear bombs, to deter Iran from retaliating with missiles with chemical warheads and from invading Iraq, thereby saving the lives of 150,000 American soldiers.
You argue that Iran's chemical and nuclear facilities had to be destroyed to prevent terrorists using weapons from those facilities to attack the U.S. (Never mind that the nuclear facilities were just nuclear reactors, not nuclear weapons).
You get Israel to pull the trigger, i.e., bomb some Iranian installations (as it did in Iraq at Osirak) to provoke an Iranian response.
Now enter the world after the U.S. "demo," according to U.S. planners:

There will be no doubt that U.S. statements on the use of nuclear weapons will have deterrent value.
The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty will be amended to prohibit uranium-enrichment for all countries that do not do it already; violators will be nuked.
North Korea will be forced to disarm under the now real and credible threat of massive U.S. nuclear attack.
Any country suspected of pursuing nuclear weapons or any other military capability that could threaten the U.S. or its allies will be nuked.
Russia, China, and all other nuclear countries will eventually be forced to disarm under the threat of massive U.S. nuclear attack.
However, the real world does not always follow the script envisioned by U.S. planners, as the Iraq experience illustrates. So here is a more likely "post-demo" scenario:

Many non-nuclear countries, including those currently friendly to the U.S., will rush to develop a nuclear deterrent, and many will succeed.
Terrorist groups sympathetic to Iran will do their utmost to retaliate in-kind against the U.S., and eventually will succeed.
With the taboo against the use of nuclear weapons broken, use of them by other countries will follow in various regional conflicts, and subsequent escalation will lead to global nuclear war.
Bye-bye world, including the United States of America.
Snuffysmith
What's behind Iranian leader's anti-Israel rant
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's zeal brings leverage at home - but not
abroad. By Dan Murphy
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1101/p01s02-wome.html?s=hns
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.