Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Native-American speaker touts 2nd Amendment rights
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Second Amendment, Gun Safety and Gun Control > Second Amendment, Gun Safety and Gun Control Archive
WHIGHF
QUOTE
http://www.athensnews.com/issue/article.php3?story_id=21703

Native-American speaker touts 2nd Amendment rights
2005-09-29
By Angela Rito
Athens NEWS Campus Reporter


A Native-American professor from Oklahoma defended the Second Amendment in a speech at Ohio University's Bentley Hall on Tuesday night.

"Owning a weapon is a precious freedom," declared David Yeagley, a member of the Comanche Nation.

Yeagley's speech, entitled "He Who Takes My Weapon Is My Enemy: An American Indian View of the Second Amendment," was sponsored by the OU Second Amendment Club and Young America's Foundation.

Yeagley is a columnist for the Internet magazine Front Line, in which he advocates conservative ideas from a Native-American viewpoint. The liberal arts professor holds degrees from Oberlin, Yale, Emory, the University of Hartford and the University of Arizona and currently teaches at the University of Oklahoma.

The professor talked about the importance of owning a weapon in Native-American society, citing his recent visit with an American Indian friend on the reservation who had killed the deer that he and his family ate for dinner that night. "A gun is like a part of clothing for Indians today," Yeagley said.

Yeagley spoke of his Native-American heritage, citing the Comanche Indians as having once been considered the largest hunting empire in America. "They were not known for peace or tranquility," he acknowledged. However, Yeagley said that the Comanches were not a warlike nation that actively took over other territories; they merely intimidated other Indian nations in order to keep them off of their lands.

"Land and resources are valuable assets," said Yeagley. "If you have them, someone will want to take them."

The professor questioned why someone would want to take away another person's gun. "Do they want to prevent you from protecting what you have?" he asked.

Yeagley cited some statistics from the book "Seven Myths of Gun Control" by Richard Poe in his speech, including research that rejects the "myth" that the right to bear arms increases violent crime and the alleged misconception that guns pose a threat to children. He said that when guns are not being used for hunting animals, they are usually possessed for the sake of protection from criminals. "In most cases of criminal encounter the gun doesn't even have to be used," he said. "Merely brandishing it causes the criminal to flee."

The professor said that the surrender of arms suggests submissiveness to the government, which by definition should be "of the people, for the people and by the people." "Muslims? Mexicans? Egyptians? Who is the enemy on this land this day to protect yourself from?" Yeagley asked. "Could it possibly be the U.S. government?

"In modern history, every nation that has disarmed its people has turned into a tyrannical, oppressive government," Yeagley commented, repeating a common refrain among gun-rights advocates, "from Stalin to Castro and even Hitler."

Yeagley suggested that gun control "infantilizes" citizens. "It's like saying, 'You can't be trusted to take care of yourself. Give me your weapon and I will take care of you instead,'" he said.

The lecturer mentioned several 17th-century laws that actually required the possession of guns in Virginia and Connecticut, one of which even enforced bringing rifles to church. "Have we come full circle or what?" he asked.

Yeagley argued that no human should have such power over another as to take away his or her weapon (though most so-called gun control doesn't involve "taking" guns, but rather registering them or limiting their sale).

"Giving up your gun to someone else on demand is called surrender," Yeagley said. "It means that you have given up your ability to protect yourself to a power that is greater than you."

The professor closed by proclaiming his and other Native Americans' pride in the United States despite the gun-control issue. "America," he said, touching the U.S. flag, "what a great country."

Yeagley has appeared on Fox News Channel's "Hannity and Colmes" and has spoken at colleges and churches all over the country.
Frenchy
A true and original American who understands & celebrates the intent of constitutional freedom. This coming from someone who well knows the loss of freedom from an oppressive nation. Kudos to this gentleman!
shammala
We do love our guns!!!
I think it is in our genes,you should see the care that goes into our guns!!!
I use mine for hunting only and clean it every week!!!
It is like an article of clothing,I keep mine in a beaded gun case,that I made from my first deer.
Alexander38
"In modern history, every nation that has disarmed its people has turned into a tyrannical, oppressive government," Yeagley commented, repeating a common refrain among gun-rights advocates, "from Stalin to Castro and even Hitler."


Not quite true, it is not the case for either the Scandinavian countries nor UK, or Netherlands for that matter, and what about Belgium and France?
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(Alexander38 @ Oct 26 2005, 02:26 PM)
"In modern history, every nation that has disarmed its people has turned into a tyrannical, oppressive government," Yeagley commented, repeating a common refrain among gun-rights advocates, "from Stalin to Castro and even Hitler."
Not quite true, it is not the case for either the Scandinavian countries nor UK, or Netherlands for that matter, and what about Belgium and France?
*

Are Danes allowed to own firearms? If so, what kind?
Alexander38
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Oct 26 2005, 10:27 PM)
Are Danes allowed to own firearms? If so, what kind?
*


Mostly hunting weapons and guns for a shooting range (Rifles, revolvers and pistols)
But after the big war we established a homeguard not unlike the one you have in the states today, eksept that they operate independently of the millitary in most cases and have their weapons such as LMG, sniper rifles, SMG and assault weapons of various kinds in their homes (Eksplosives is the ekseption).
Frenchy
QUOTE(Alexander38 @ Oct 26 2005, 04:37 PM)
Mostly hunting weapons and guns for a shooting range (Rifles, revolvers and pistols)
But after the big war we established a homeguard not unlike the one you have in the states today, eksept that they operate independently of the millitary in most cases and have their weapons such as LMG, sniper rifles, SMG and assault weapons of various kinds in their homes (Eksplosives is the ekseption).
*


A true militia...not un-like that our forefathers originally intended.
Alexander38
QUOTE(Frenchy @ Oct 27 2005, 01:41 AM)
A true militia...not un-like that our forefathers originally intended.
*


True but a well regulatet one, just like it is mention in constitution.
By the way it is mostly (More than 85%) former soldiers that are member of our *Hjemmeværn* or * Homeguard* directly translatet.
It is by the way written into it's by laws that it may NOT obey a sitting govement IF the country is occupied, since the govement in quistion will be seen as the occupiers mouthpieces and irrelevant, and it cannot aksept any surrender from the govements side if the country gets occupied after the surrender.
Frenchy
QUOTE(Alexander38 @ Oct 27 2005, 08:42 PM)
True but a well regulatet one, just like it is mention in constitution.
By the way it is mostly (More than 85%) former soldiers that are member of our *Hjemmeværn* or * Homeguard* directly translatet.
It is by the way written into it's by laws that it may NOT obey a sitting govement IF the country is occupied, since the govement in quistion will be seen as the occupiers mouthpieces and irrelevant, and it cannot aksept any surrender from the govements side if the country gets occupied after the surrender.
*


What is the low and high age to serve, Alexander? Is it comparible to Switzerland?
Alexander38
QUOTE(Frenchy @ Oct 28 2005, 06:00 AM)
What is the low and high age to serve, Alexander? Is it comparible to Switzerland?
*


18 to 50 can be ekstentet to 58 if the person involved is in good shape, conterary to the regular army theres full gender equallity in the homeguard, you just have to learn the basics about millitary and civilian law and pass a physical course to be eligble.
Frenchy
QUOTE(Alexander38 @ Oct 28 2005, 06:03 PM)
18 to 50 can be ekstentet to 58 if the person involved is in good shape, conterary to the regular army theres full gender equallity in the homeguard, you just have to learn the basics about millitary and civilian law and pass a physical course to be eligble.
*


That's a good system.
Pkemp22402
QUOTE
Yeagley cited some statistics from the book "Seven Myths of Gun Control" by Richard Poe in his speech, including research that rejects the "myth" that the right to bear arms increases violent crime and the alleged misconception that guns pose a threat to children. He said that when guns are not being used for hunting animals, they are usually possessed for the sake of protection from criminals. "In most cases of criminal encounter the gun doesn't even have to be used," he said. "Merely brandishing it causes the criminal to flee."


I agree with this statement completely. Allowing gun ownership actually decreases the crime rate in states that allow concealed weapons to be carried.


QUOTE
The professor closed by proclaiming his and other Native Americans' pride in the United States despite the gun-control issue. "America," he said, touching the U.S. flag, "what a great country." 


smile.gif smile.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.