(Note from MC -- This is an oldie but goodie from the year 2000. And FYI since I keep forgetting to post it: A couple of months ago I was watching C-SPAN and Dennis Moore proposed a Social Security lockbox to keep Republicans from grabbing Social Security money and spending it, but Republicans of course would not allow this to get out of committee.)
MY ACTIVITIES IN CONGRESS
Newspaper Article
Moore Patience
Congressman finds building bipartisan coalitions is one of toughest tasks for lawmakers
Reprinted with the permission of the
Osawatomie Graphic
By Sue South
April 26, 2000
Building bipartisan coalitions to address issues facing Congress and pass meaningful legislation is essential, but it's also one of the toughest things a federal lawmaker faces, as U.S. Rep. Dennis Moore found out during his first 15 months in office.
Recent accomplishments of Congress, such as the repeal of the earnings limit for Social Security beneficiaries, are the result of Democrats and Republicans working together toward the same goal, not against each other.
"I think people in this country are absolutely thrilled when they see Congress work on a bipartisan basis." Moore said during an interview last week. "We should do that on other issues such as the Patients' Bill of Rights and campaign finance reform."
The 3rd District congressman was in Paola last week to conduct a forum on the high cost of prescription medications for the elderly and to speak to the Paola Rotary Club.
Even when legislation has support from both sides of the aisle, congressional leadership holds the upper hand. The House and Senate passed their own versions of a patients' bill of rights, and a conference committee has been charged with negotiating the differences.
It was bipartisan legislation sponsored by Democrats and Republicans to provide basic protections for medical patients, Moore said.
"The disturbing thing about the conference committee, is the speaker (House Speaker Dennis Hastert) appointed 13 conferees and 12 voted against it," he said. "It doesn't bode well."
The leadership also is holding up legislation to require trigger locks on guns, he said.
"I'm not taking away anyone's rights to a firearm, if they legally have one," he said. "I think it would pass, if the leadership would let us vote on it."
Trigger locks are a safeguard that could help prevent serious injuries and fatal accidents, Moore said.
A bill that Moore introduced to reduce and simplify estate taxes by increasing the unified estate and gift tax credit to $3 million is another victim of leadership control. The legislation would cover most small-business owners and farmers, and would protect the 80 to 90 percent of Americans with estates smaller than $3 million.
"I found out that leadership totally controls the agenda," he said. "If it wants something to get on the floor, it will."
Campaign finance reform is the same way. The House passed the Shays-Meehan Act last year, but similar legislation was blocked in the Senate by one senator, he said.
A bill that would require tax-exempt groups that attempt to influence the outcome of federal elections to disclose who contributes to them and how much is a victim of partisanship.
"At the very least, people should know who it is trying to influence their vote," Moore said. "We have 58 co-sponsors, but the only Republican is Chris Shays.
"It's frustrating when you see such extreme partisanship," he said.
He also is frustrated by Congress' broken promises, particularly the promise of funding to help states pay the extra costs of special education.
When Congress passed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 1975, it promised to fund up to 40 percent of the extra costs, Moore said. The funding is at 12 percent now.
"Congress made a promise and ought to keep this promise," he said. "It would help states and local school boards out, if Congress would keep up its end of the deal."
Among the recent accomplishments of the House is a passage of a measure that provides tax breaks for small businesses, he said.
Major provisions of the bill include pension portability, tax credits for businesses opening in economically depressed areas and a reduced estate tax. It also would accelerate the 100 percent deduction for the self-employed and increase the deduction for the purchase of business equipment.
The House also passed legislation to increase the current standard deduction for married couples, and a bill written by Moore to increase the amount individuals may contribute to individual retirement accounts from $2,000 to $5,000 per year [is gaining support.]
Congress is now faced with deciding what to do with a true budget surplus, not one that includes Social Security funds, Moore said. The real benefit of that is, if substantial portions of the national debt can be paid off, the interest on the debt would be reduced and taxes could be cut.
At 13.5 percent of the federal budget, interest paid on the national debt is the federal government's third largest expense behind Social Security and national defense and ahead of Medicare.
Moore voted last year to apply 50 percent of the surplus to debt reduction, 25 percent to bolstering Social Security and 25 percent to other purposes. That would not extend the solvency of Social Security, but would future generations in a position to do something about their own retirement needs, Moore said.
"It's the only fair thing to do for our kids and grandkids," he said.
On the international front, Moore said he thought the current administration was ambiguous about saying what it would do about a threat to Taiwan from China.
"We are backing Taiwan and its right to be secure from aggressive force used by China," Moore said. "This president and past presidents haven't been any more explicit than to say we don't want this to happen.
"It doesn't make sense that China would make these threats to Taiwan when trying to get permanent trade relations with us," he said.
Moore supports free trade with China.
"I really think that's the right thing to do for our country," he said.
China, not the United States, is making all the concessions, such as lowering tariffs, he said. That would give the United States the same opportunities China has had for years.
"Once you get to know them better, hopefully, you will try to sit down and settle disputes peacefully," Moore said. "Then you have a forum for a relationship before you start throwing bombs at each other."
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:vACdu...+congress&hl=en(I have no doubt goofed again when posting this link due to computer incompetence - note from MC)