Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Pesticide study with children delayed
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Energy Independence, Environment, Science and Technology > Energy, Environment, Science and Technology Issues Archive
GreenPA
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/11/12...y.ap/index.html

QUOTE
Pesticide study with children delayed
Ethical concerns over test subjects and chemical industry funding
Friday, November 12, 2004 Posted: 10:13 AM EST (1513 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A planned government study into how children's bodies absorb pesticides and other chemicals has been temporarily suspended due to ethical concerns.

The Environmental Protection Agency said it would ask an outside panel of scientists to review its planned two-year study involving the families of 60 children in Duval County, Florida, and report back by spring. The study's design has already been reviewed by four other external boards, including two universities.

The study was to look at how pesticides, which can cause neurological damage in children, and chemicals such as flame retardants might be ingested, inhaled or otherwise absorbed through such things as food, drink, soil, crop residue and household dust.

"If we decide to go forward with this study, we want to make sure it's done right," EPA spokeswoman Cynthia Bergman said Wednesday. "There have been several concerns raised, including within the agency, and we want to be responsive and address those concerns."

Scientists at EPA and environmentalists questioned whether the government should give participating families $970 plus a camcorder and children's clothes, saying it might encourage low-income families to use pesticides in their homes.

EPA also had agreed to accept $2 million for the $9 million study from the American Chemistry Council, a trade group that represents chemical makers.

"It's fine that they pushed the pause button here," said Richard Wiles, senior vice president for the Environmental Working Group, an advocacy and research organization. "But for the study to have any integrity at all, they need to kick the chemical industry lobbyists and their money completely out of the process."

The trade group said in a statement that more review is useful, but it still supports the study "because of the great importance of increasing understanding of the exposures of young children to pesticides and other chemicals they naturally encounter in their daily lives."
sagehen
Note who was supposed to be the subject of the study: "Participants for the study were chosen from 6 health clinics and three hospitals in Jacksonville, FL. These medical facilities report that 51% of their births are to non-white mothers and 62% of mothers have only received an elementary or secondary education."
Source: http://www.organicconsumers.org/epa-alert.htm

In other words, it's ok to do "chemical experiments" on children of non-white, under-educated parents who might be tempted to take a video-recorder and $970 for their children. First, if allowing children to be exposed to harmful chemicals isn't bad enough, the underlying racism is utterly deplorable. Secondly, it's exploitationism of the first water.

"The trick here is that these products are known to have negative long term health effects. This is a short two year study. The results are already known...there will be little to no obvious negative effects on these children at the end of the two year period. The seemingly positive results of the study will allow the ACC to advertise positive "EPA study results" to the public, which will allow the ACC to more effectively lobby congress to weaken regulations on these products even more (thereby increasing profits dramatically). This technique has been exercised by the ACC for decades."
readyinTX
Hey all you Enviros! Kudos to you--I'm with you all the way.

Now, for the sake of policies affecting our environment, please come visit us at the Fair Elections forum and read up!

We need you help.
Jothika
American Chemistry Council...are there any groups--preferably backed by scientists--who oppose them?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.