Say a Curse word or two here (editied of couse) ... I want the Indictmets already ... Quit Teasing ME !!!

To Quote Cheney "&^#@ Yourself" - WH You Damn Ba$#25ds.

GONNA GET @#@#%^# Indicted ... the Lot of You !!!!

HA HA ...




I feel a little better.

Rush and Hannity can go to HELLOS TOO!!!

The lack of news on this is getting to me ... darn it !!!!

Here's a poll to vent at:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080261/#survey

I LIKE'Y THE RESULTS !!!!

Who could not be interested in the Leak Investigation???? I've spent all day surreptitiously checking for indictments, trying to get ahead on my work, so when they DO come, I'll have a few minutes to read all the skinny!

Oh, thank GOD for a vent frustrations thread! Enough suspense already!!!! When in the HELL is this going to finally break! I guess Thursday is the day of the news conference. Do we have to wait until THEN???

I know, I keep checking from work and delete my cookies, files and clear my
history as soon as I'm done! I'm the only employee in the office but you
never know who comes in to check afterwards. The maintenance kid asked
to check his email today and when he left, I realized this website was on the
drop-down list and started panicking because he's a Bush lover!

That's right follow the fu#$&^% Cheney Money Trail ... All the way back to his Bu%% F%@& buddies screwing the US Average American.

ALL THE WAY !!!



I'm feeling a little bit better now.

Vice President James Baker


urggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I've heard that the indictments will be sealed. So does that mean we don't get to find out who was indicted for what? If that's the case, you'll hear my agonized screams all the way across the continent.

OOOOH, no, they can't do that, can they??

That's the thing I don't know. Perhaps it's just the details of the indictments that can't be made public, because it deals with issues of national security and classified information. So perhaps we can find out simple thing like person A was indicted for perjury, and person B was indicted for obstruction of justice. But they just can't tell us the details. I'm ok with that. I just want to know who the indicted people are, and what they are charged with.

You know what is really funny

For the last 10 days or so, there have been 100s and 100s of articles posted all proporting to know what is happening.

And this guy Fitzgerald keeps it all inside. No real leaks about the leak.

so none of us know anymore anything. Just rumors. And we have been debating rumors for all this time.

I just hope we are not all let down when it is announced

I will defnitely be disappointed if Rove, for instance, walks

I think your right ... it has to be sealed till delivered ... I think, don't know for sure ...

Here's something I've been wondering for awhile, now. We're all so gung-ho on Fitzgerald, despite his being a Republican, as he has such a stirling reputation for independence. How are we going to respond to him if he doesn't indict anybody? Will we turn on him, and accuse him of chicanery?

Who said he was republican? He is an independent voter from Brooklyn, NY

I threw a dart and these are the random emoticons that popped up.

Are you sure about that? I thought I'd read that he was a repub. Sorry, if I'm wrong.

A lot of people will certainly be very disappointed and accuse Fitzgerald of wrongdoing. But realize this at least: He is not a republican and never has been. He has always been an independent.

I read you loud and clear, Redbird.

Okay, okay! Excuuuuuuze me! (in honor of Steve Martin's recent award)

I have seen that a lot too, but I think it was assumption based on him being a Bush appointee. More reliable information asserts he is definitely an independent.

I heard recently that he describes himself as an independent. I don't know what to think about the indictments. Like everything else we thought would bring these thugs down, they manage to slither away. We have no chance until we win the House and the Senate. Meanwhile they continue to rape the Republic!

He wasn't appointed by Bush.

Ashcroft recused himself and somehow this Brooklyn kid who indicted the WTC 1993 bombers among others and went to Chicago got the job, through a recommendation of others. He had worked for Mary White in NYC

Its like most people don't realize Rudy G. was an independent through alot of his career too, and only became a republican to get the nomination for mayor (much like Mike Bloomberg who is a liberal democrat hiding as a repub.)

For all intents Rudy is too.

(4) Sealed Indictment. The magistrate judge to whom an indictment is returned may direct that the indictment be kept secret until the defendant is in custody or has been released pending trial. The clerk must then seal the indictment, and no person may disclose the indictment's existence except as necessary to issue or execute a warrant or summons.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

http://www.law.ku.edu/research/frcriIII.htm

Finally a vent post.

I am tired of .

I want them to get caught in their ugly web !

I am sooooooooo of all of THEM !

@#%%E$%#$@%^&^%**&*%%^$#$$%###^&*&^^^^#%%$$@^%!!!*%&$#@!

You probably did read that, Pegatha. We are all reading so much, everywhere, from all sorts of places. On TV tonight NBC interviewed an old friend of his and he said that Fitz was "apolitical." A workaholic with no political or other ties. Just a man with a hatred for corruption.

And I read that he was Bush appointee.

That's right, he is really an independent. He registered in IL as an Independent, found out it was actually a political party, and changed to unaffiliated. Was on the CNN website a few days ago.

God help us all if this turns into nothing. Because then we'll have yet another round of gloating conservatives claiming their mandate to steamroll over every thing in sight.

I am hopeful. I am guardedly optimistic. But mostly I have a gnawing worry in the pit of my stomach.

Sunshine started a smart post earlier warning against putting all the eggs in one basket.

We can keep up the doubts and opposition indictments or not. They are so evil on so many levels. Indictments should be viewed as a plus but if they don't come that won't bring back the 2000 US service people; it won't put 500 billion back in the treasury; it won't heal the wounded soldiers or make up for the tens of thousands of Iraqi's Bush & Cheney killed. If the special prosecuter does not come back with important indictments then we should be more vocal and steadfast in resisting these monsters.

putting it mildly

How true How True ...

(expletive deleted - we REALLY don't like this one - Admin ) !!!

I'm felling better all the time

*(#$PHJNFUOEJROMFEO90d9843322@@#(R%)(_

Venting.

MSNBC just said that there won't be any announcements or action
today. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Here's another rumor, but I heard that the "targets" have already been sent letters telling them they should expect bad news from Fitzgerald and, perhaps, the Grand Jury. My sister said she got this from Crooks and Liars. If this is old news to you all, I'm sorry. But I too, am actually home today with a sick five year old, thinking I'd just hang in front of the TV with my popcorn and watch the show! It better happen SOON!!! :hexe:

ARGH!!!!!! I hope they are wrong!

Can I vent?

I sure wish that graham guy would stop posting his rants about Clinton.
We are all nervous and all and we don't want to hear graham posting about
Bill at this point
even if it is true.

Can't he just go away.
We are all frustrated here...
so CAN IT graham, okay???

Thats whats Huff Post is saying too

LOL!