It might be a coincidence that yesterday I posted about Michael Meacher - who is written off by some as a conspiracy theorist - but today on CNN there were hints that there is a change in the air. Lou Dobbs interviewed the lawyer of Colonel Anthony Schaffer. This military man claims that charts and documents were destroyed and that he tried to get the 911 Commission to listen to him but they would not. The White House was holding back information on ABLE DANGER.
The government are hiding the truth that Mohammad Atta was a double agent working for the west. But the conspiracy is much grander than just 911.

If you want to find out more google Anthony Schaffer or Curt Weldon.

If you have not already read it read the article from the Guardian that is under Michael Meacher when googled. It is past all the critical articles on him, at the bottom hiding there, the truth.

It would explain why Bush and Cheney did not testify under oath. They did not want to be bitten back later when it was found they had lied to the Commission.

If you think Plamegate and the Miers nomination are important, than Bush is correct in saying 'It's just background noise.' The real thunder is approaching. Now is the time for all those who keep using the term 'conspiracy theorist' to write people off as crazy, to either change sides or to keep very quiet. A HUGE storm is brewing.

Typically CNN underplayed it. They have been part of this conspiracy and they know it. They were the ones who continually gave democrats voices a back seat while propounding the views of neo-cons like Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld. They obediently put out propaganda and did not even question why Bush refused to do what Clinton did, which was to testify under oath and without his team-mate next to him (to keep the stories the same.)

The destruction of documents: Albert Pike's conspiracy, Bush's National Guard career (or lack of) and now the refusal to disclose Miers documents, show a pattern of deceit and covering-up.

The story of 911 was first questioned first in America in the Boston Globe (as far as I know), and a little known British journalist whose name I will not reveal, then it was exposed in the Daily Mail a conservative mainstream paper this summer. All along the Guardian has covered the story of MI5/MI6 terrorism. But only the left-wingers buy that paper.

Another strange thing is that a few of the 9/11 commission members say they never had access to these documents. However, Slade Gordon came out and said they in fact did have access to the documents and that they had nothing to do with Atta. I smell something fishy here. Able Danger supposedly proves that not only did the Bush White house know about Atta before hand but also that 9/11 could not have happened the way the "official story" says it did. Able Danger is a major victory for those of us who question the "official story" of 9/11. I really hope this is investigated thoroughly.

Not as destroyed as it appears -

http://www.calpundit.com/archives/003220.html