Iran fears that Israel is a stepping stone to the Zionists taking over the world. Israel has nuclear weapons which it kept secret for many years, thereby avoiding safety checks by the international nuclear weapons organization. Then Vanunu Mordechai blew the whistle and was kidnapped by Mossad and subsequently jailed for a very long time. People who work at the nuclear weapons plant are silenced by the Israeli government and live in fear, never talking to reporters.
Why should Iran be denied Nuclear Weapons, which would be safety checked by the international board, but Israel allowed them? Is it something to do with USA and British hopes of taking over the whole of the Middle East by alligning itself with and financing Israel? This hope can only lead to all out nuclear war. Pakistan, which is supposed to be an ally in the war on terror allowed one of its top scientists to go free after selling their secrets to the axis of evil country North Korea and others.
While shouting that Iran should leave the UN for saying Israel should be wiped off the map, nobody is saying anything about UN member Sudan. They have been committing genocide there quite openly since the Iraq war began. China, who has a veto vote on the UN as it is a permanent member, unlike Japan, has been the supplier of weapons to the Arab government so that they could torture then kill innocent young black boys, rape girls and women and torch their villages, leaving them without protection in the world. Rather than punishing China, America outsources work there and imports their goods, leaving US citizens with the choice of joining the services or risking unemployment.
Rush Limbaugh, during Clinton's years always criticized the UN because of Sudan's membership. I hope he has been speaking out the past 3 years that the Arabs have been slaughtering the blacks. If not, he must be a racist.
And why is it that almost nobody is taking notice of the Darfurians? Because Sudan cleverly used the war in Iraq as a cover for its atrocities (much like Japan used the war against Germany as a cover) and they get little media attention. Even silent consent from Bush. He manages to keep his head in the sand like an ostrich, then take it out to say that torture is okay. He is the most racist president since Woodrow Wilson who brought the KKK back to life after Lincoln abolished it. The KKK is alive and well in the White House as well as in torture chambers all over the world, including the British and USA managed ones.
Bush also allowed the good people of New Orleans to go unheard: the Governor's calls for help went unanswered. People were locked in, unsupplied, and guarded at the Superdome, and shouting 'We want help' outside the Convention Centre, as if it was some wierd reality show about survival.
Meanwhile empty buses left the New Orleans area, videoed and reported by three young men, not CNN (who merely interviewed them and showed their video). They had had to forge Press Passes to get past the National Guard in another surreal moment in US history. Buses to the Convention Centre and Superdome were turned back twice according to reports I heard, and so was the Red Cross. That reminds us of the Red Cross's vain attempts to contact POWs over the war on terror. However the chances of investigations into the aftermath of Katrina are probably nil.
Take a look at this story: The Bridge Too Far - which CNN promised, but failed to follow up on.
http://radio.weblogs.com/0107064/2005/09/07.html#a1013 (Hope it works)