• There's a widespread skepticism about the final vote counts in many states, especially because of the vast difference between those results & the exit polls.
• The single academic argument in favor of the voting-results-as-is harkens from the Cal-Tech/MIT Electronic Voting Project.
• The leaders of both schools' efforts in this consortium are men with strong ties to the radical-right movement.
• The arguments they make in this unsigned paper run counter to the core positions they've taken before on electronic voting.

For a full explanation, read the story at http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/14/03617/399

The CNN exit polls were directly reversed statistics of the original exit polls everyone claimed were wrong....In other news, bogus

Thanks for posting this. Quite the contrast to the previous Caltech/MIT 95 page dissertaion signed by both Institute's Presidents. I especially liked the excerpt the post writes about pertaining to pages 45-47 in the 2001 study on the speculation of problems if more computerized methods were used! It really makes the later paper seem more like a fake.

Cool!

YEP.