Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Iraq News Volume 8 November 8, 2005
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Foreign Policy and National Defense > Foreign Policy & National Defense Issues Archive
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Snuffysmith
Separate Blasts Kill Nearly 100 in Iraq

By Ellen Knickmeyer and Naseer Nouri

BAGHDAD, Nov. 18 -- Suicide bombers killed nearly 100 people Friday in one of the deadliest days of Iraq's insurgency, bringing houses down on sleeping families in Baghdad and shredding Shiite Muslim worshipers in two mosques in the eastern part of the country just as the victims turned their faces up to the preachers to hear their Friday sermons.

"We had just said 'God is Great' -- and then I felt nothing but a massive explosion," Mohammed Kofiq Akram said by telephone from a hospital in Khanaqin, the northeastern town where most of the deaths occurred. Akram said his head and right shoulder had been blasted by shrapnel.

At least 90 people were killed in the two mosques, according to Ibrahim Hassan Bajillan, head of the governing council for Diyala province. In both buildings, witnesses said, the explosions came just as worshipers were settling themselves on the floor to listen to their imams after finishing ritual prayers.

In Baghdad, there were no casualties in a hotel that Iraqi police and U.S. soldiers said was the target of two successive bombings. But the explosions leveled the simple houses outside the hotel's blast walls, killing at least eight people.

In the aftermath of the Baghdad blasts, emergency workers scooped a wailing, bleeding girl of about 8 or 9 off a mound of rubble from a collapsed apartment building while twisted vehicles burned and firefighters clawed with their hands to reach trapped families. "My son! My son!'' one woman screamed, collapsing in the arms of a ring of women in black abayas . The boy had been crushed to death.

Nationwide, the attacks were the deadliest since Sept. 14, when at least 14 insurgent bombings in Baghdad killed more than 160 people. Al Qaeda in Iraq was believed to have been involved in at least the Baghdad blasts on Friday. The insurgent group said in a statement that the bombings represented retaliation for a U.S. military offensive still underway in far western Iraq.

As in the September attacks, most of the victims Friday were civilians.

The same ruthless frequency of attacks that has dulled international attention to the carnage in Iraq has made Baghdad's emergency workers briskly efficient. Firefighters, sweating from exertion despite the coolness of the autumn morning, ferried oxygen and water to a man trapped under what had been the top floor of his home.

"Go! Go!" watching men exhorted.

The rescue fixated the neighborhood for more than an hour while other firefighters pulled one or two contorted, flopping corpses from nearby apartments.

When the survivor proved to be a Sudanese Arab -- a member of a group mistrusted by many in Iraq -- the neighbors watched silently. No cheers went up as rescuers carried the man on a stretcher down the hill of broken masonry, his body almost miraculously spared injury and his head twisting as he craned to see the destruction.

"Take pictures! Take more pictures of our tragedy!" a woman standing in one of at least four small, destroyed apartment buildings cried out to photographers as a neighbor wiped blood from her face.

"Let Bush see them,'' said the woman, who identified herself as Um Ahmad. "Let him be happy to see these pictures. Let him see what he did to us. We used to live in peace before he entered our country."

A man known in the neighborhood to be emotionally disturbed walked up to American soldiers at the scene to seek treatment for his bleeding face and back. As the Americans struggled to communicate with him, the man switched to English. "Why?" he cried. "Why?"

The dead in Baghdad included two women and two children, according to rescue crews.

Iraqi police and a U.S. military officer said the blasts in the capital appeared to have targeted the Hamra Hotel, which houses some Westerners, including journalists. The attackers apparently used a mix of high- and low-grade explosives and two vehicles to try to blow their way into the hotel compound, security officials said. The relatively sophisticated operation was almost identical to an Oct. 24 attack on the Palestine Hotel, which also houses Westerners. Eighteen Iraqis died in that triple-bomb attack.

A security camera at the Hamra filmed the first vehicle, a white van or minibus, as it exploded outside concrete blast walls guarding the hotel. The vehicle billowed into flame and dust as it drew level with a hotel employee walking to work.

The first blast appeared intended to blow down the blast walls so a second, larger vehicle bomb could enter the hotel complex, security officials said. But debris and craters left by the first blast apparently blocked the second vehicle, which exploded among the apartment buildings outside.

The force of the blast sent a bomber's foot into the hotel courtyard, and a scalp landed on the tile around the hotel pool. Part of what looked like an arm cleared the 12-story hotel to land in a yard hundreds of feet away.

A third vehicle bomb was discovered and detonated hours later.

The hotel bombings occurred less than a block from an Interior Ministry building where U.S. troops this week found a secret prison housing scores of mostly Sunni Arab prisoners. The security camera tape and other evidence indicated, however, that the hotel and not the now-emptied clandestine prison was the target, authorities said.

Friday's bombings in Khanaqin blew the roofs off both mosques, leaving them open to the sky and the tiled minarets above. Survivors gave nearly identical descriptions of both blasts: The attackers lined up among the rows of men and detonated explosive belts strapped around their waists.

The number of dead was expected to rise when the search for bodies resumed at daylight, said Bajillan, the provincial official.

Such blasts are comparatively infrequent in the Kurdish-populated north, which has been spared much of the bloodshed afflicting the rest of Iraq. In Baghdad and towns just to the south, attacks by the Sunni Muslim-led insurgency on Shiite mosques have killed hundreds of civilians, particularly since the Shiite-controlled government took office nearly seven months ago.

Special correspondent Hassan Shammari contributed to this report from Diyala province.




Would you like to send this article to a friend? Go to
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/e...er=emailarticle
Snuffysmith
Bush, in Asia, Vows To Keep U.S. in Iraq

By Peter Baker

OSAN AIR BASE, South Korea, Nov. 19 -- Facing a backlash on Iraq both at home and abroad, President Bush declared Saturday that an early troop withdrawal would be "a recipe for disaster" and renewed his vow to stay in the war until "we have completed our mission."

Trading his suit coat for a bomber's jacket, Bush delivered his sharp retort to war opponents surrounded by cheering troops in camouflage uniforms at this U.S. military base south of Seoul. While ostensibly on an overseas trip focused on economics, Bush directed his attention to critics at home in remarks just hours after the House voted down a proposal to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq.

"In Washington, there are some who say that the sacrifice is too great and they urge us to set a date for withdrawal before we have completed our mission," he told several thousand service members in a drafty hangar at the headquarters of the 7th Air Force, the main U.S. Air Force unit in South Korea. "Those who are in the fight know better."

It was the second time on this week-long trip that Bush has used a speech at a U.S. military base to advance his case on Iraq. Adopting the judgment of a top U.S. general in Iraq who called a withdrawal schedule "a recipe for disaster," the president promised to follow the "sober judgment" of the military. "We will fight the terrorists in Iraq," Bush said. "We will stay in the fight until we have achieved . . . the victory our brave troops have fought for."

But the appearance followed an unexpected embarrassment in keeping together his international coalition in Iraq. Just hours after Bush hailed South Korea for contributing more troops to Iraq than any other ally except Britain, South Korean defense officials revealed plans Friday to withdraw one-third of their force. Aides traveling with the president sought explanations from their South Korean counterparts while politely playing down the development in public.

The Iraq debate has shadowed Bush throughout his four-nation trip, from the tough speech he gave at a refueling stop at an Alaska air base on the way over to the harsh denunciations of his critics that his staff has issued each day. On Friday, thousands of protesters, angry about the war and global trade policies, chanted "No Bush" in the streets of the South Korean port city of Pusan, throwing rocks at police, who responded with powerful water cannon blasts.

Bush was in Pusan for the annual summit of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum. The APEC summit wrapped up Saturday with agreements by 21 nations representing half the world economy to push forward on global trade talks and coordinate regional efforts to head off a possible avian flu pandemic.

Bush also conferred with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, discussing Iran's nuclear program and the Kremlin's latest efforts to curtail domestic opposition. Bush met with President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono of Indonesia on Saturday to discuss economic and security issues, including the Muslim nation's struggle with terrorism.

After stopping here to address troops, Bush departed South Korea on Saturday en route to Beijing, where he planned talks with Chinese President Hu Jintao on trade, currency, human rights and North Korea's nuclear weapons program. Bush began his trip in Japan and is to finish it Monday in Mongolia before returning to Washington.

White House officials recognized that none of the issues discussed on the trip was likely to produce major news that would knock Iraq off the front page, especially after fresh reports of violence in Baghdad and word that a prominent pro-military Democrat, Rep. John P. Murtha (Pa.), had turned against the war. And so the president chose to confront the war debate rather than avoid it and commissioned advisers to map out a strategy to punch back.

White House counselor Dan Bartlett said the president had no choice, because he has been so provoked by Democrats accusing him of manipulating prewar intelligence. "There is a bright red line there, and it's one the Democrats have crossed," Bartlett said. "It's not only fair game for the president to correct the record, it's his obligation." Bartlett claimed some success, saying Democrats back in Washington in the last few days seemed "a bit back on their heels." He added, "They have a hard time defending their own position."

As part of a new campaign-style effort, the Bush team issued an unusually harsh statement on White House stationery attacking Murtha for calling for troop withdrawals, likening him to liberal maverick filmmaker Michael Moore and accusing the lawmaker of wanting to "surrender to the terrorists." Angry Democrats accused Bush of crossing a bright red line of his own.

Even the president's overseas friends have provided no solace from the troubles in Iraq. As the Japanese consider pulling out some of their self-defense forces from Iraq next spring, Bush concluded it was not even worth trying to persuade Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to keep them in place even though he called the Japanese leader "one of my best friends in the international community."

The South Koreans pulled a more awkward surprise. President Roh Moo Hyun played gracious host to a convivial, doff-the-ties visit, wining and dining Bush and showing him the nation's oldest and most fabled Buddhist temple, where they rang a bell together. During all the time he spent with Bush, Roh mentioned nothing about troop withdrawals, according to U.S. officials.

But then the South Korean Defense Ministry revealed its plans to allies in parliament, saying it intended to pull out 1,000 of its 3,200 troops from Iraq. Even Roh and the Foreign Ministry seemed surprise. Contacted at his office, a Foreign Ministry official said he could not explain and was still trying to find Defense Ministry colleagues to figure out what was happening.

With stunned U.S. officials seeking explanations, Foreign Minister Ban Ki Moon quickly emerged to tell reporters that the government would request National Assembly approval by Dec. 31 to keep some South Korean troops in Iraq. But he would not say how many. "At this point," he said, "it is planned that we will keep them but the government is considering various plans regarding the size."

Special correspondent Joohee Cho contributed to this report from Pusan.


Would you like to send this article to a friend? Go to
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/e...er=emailarticle
theglobalchinese
Sorry, George, I'm In the Majority Michael Moore
Dear Mr. Bush:
I would like to extend my hand and invite you to join us, the mainstream American majority. We, the people -- that's the majority of the people -- share these majority opinions:
  • 1. Going to war was a mistake -- a big mistake. (link)
  • 2. You and your administration misled us into this war. (link)
  • 3. We want the war ended and our troops brought home. (link)
  • 4. We don't trust you. (link)
Now, I know this is a bitter pill to swallow. Iraq was going to be your great legacy. Now, it's just your legacy. It didn't have to end up this way. This week, when Republicans and conservative Democrats started jumping ship, you lashed out at them. You thought the most damning thing you could say to them was that they were "endorsing the policy positions of Michael Moore and the extreme liberal wing of the Democratic party." I mean, is that the best you can do to persuade them to stick with you -- compare them to me? You gotta come up with a better villain. For heaven's sakes, you had a hundred-plus million other Americans who think the same way I do -- and you could have picked on any one of them! But hey, why not cut out the name-calling and the smearing and just do the obvious thing: Come join the majority! Be one of us, your fellow Americans! Is it really that hard? Is there really any other choice? George, take a walk on the wild side!

Your loyal representative from the majority,

Michael Moore
www.michaelmoore.com
mmflint@aol.com
theglobalchinese
Car bombs kill 48; Bush says war on track NEWS.com.au
CAR bombs have killed 48 people in Iraq today, a day after more than 80 died in suicide blasts across the country and as US President George W. Bush pledged never to relent in his war on terror. In the deadliest attack today, a suicide car bomber blew up his vehicle near a crowded condolence tent during a funeral for a Shiite tribal sheikh in a small town north of Baghdad. Police Colonel Muthaffar Aboud said 35 people were killed and about 50 were wounded in the attack in Abu Sayda, near Baquba, about 65km north-east of Baghdad. The wounded were taken to at least two hospitals in Baquba. Iraqis traditionally set up tents to receive well-wishers at funerals. The fact the funeral was for a well-known tribal leader suggests the tent would have been packed with mourners.
49 Die in Iraq Blasts; Bombs Kill 5 GIs ABC News
Car bombs kill 48 in Iraq; Bush says war on track Swissinfo
Xinhua - Ireland Online - Scotsman - all 1,249 related »
Snuffysmith
Number Of Iraqi civilians Slaughtered In Bush's War 100,000 +
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7170.htm

Number of U.S. Military Personnel Slaughtered In Bush's War 2093
http://icasualties.org/oif/

Number of Days U.S. Citizen Jose Padilla Has Been Jailed Without Trial or Charges In Bush's Gulag 1291 = 3 Years and 196 Days
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9221.htm
Snuffysmith
Legal, Policy, Moral Issues In Iraq Prisoner Abuse
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iraq-05zzzzzzc.html

Washington (UPI) Nov 17, 2005 - The U.S. Army intervened this week to stop the apparent abuse of Iraqi prisoners, offering a sharp contrast to a similar situation last year and raising complicated legal question about the nature of the American occupation of Iraq.

-
Snuffysmith
Three Days That Changed America
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iraq-05zzzzzzd.html
Snuffysmith
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1121/p01s02-usfp.html
USA > Foreign Policy
from the November 21, 2005 edition

Why Iraq war support fell so fast

US public support has dropped faster than during the Vietnam and Korean wars, polls show.

By Linda Feldmann | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

WASHINGTON – The three most significant US wars since 1945 - Korea, Vietnam, and now Iraq - share an important trait: As casualties mounted, American public support declined.
In the two Asian wars, that decline proved irreversible. With Iraq, the additional bad news for President Bush is that support for the war in Iraq has eroded more quickly than it did in those two conflicts.

For Mr. Bush, low support for his handling of the war - now at 35 percent, according to the latest Gallup poll - has depleted any reserves of "political capital" he had from his reelection and threatens his entire agenda. Last week's bombshell political developments, both the bipartisan Senate resolution calling for more progress reports on Iraq and the stunning call for withdrawal by a Democratic hawk, Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, have not helped.

But the seeds of Bush's woes were planted early on. Just seven months into the Iraq war, Gallup found that the percentage of Americans who viewed the sending of troops as a mistake had jumped substantially - from 25 percent in March 2003 to 40 percent in October 2003.

In June 2004, for the first time, more than half the public (54 percent) thought the US had made a mistake, a figure that holds today.

With Vietnam, that 50-percent threshold was not crossed until August 1968, several years in; with Korea, it was March 1952, about a year and a half into US involvement.

Why did Americans go sour on the Iraq war so quickly, and what can Bush do about it?

John Mueller, an expert on war and public opinion at Ohio State University, links today's lower tolerance of casualties to a weaker public commitment to the cause than was felt during the two previous, cold war-era conflicts. The discounting of the main justifications for the Iraq war - alleged weapons of mass destruction and support for international terrorism - has left many Americans skeptical of the entire enterprise.

In fact, "I'm impressed by how high support still is," Professor Mueller says. He notes that some Americans' continuing connection of the Iraq war to the war on terror is fueling that support.

In addition, intense political polarization gives Bush resilient support among Republicans.

But among Democratic voters who supported the US-led invasion initially, most have long abandoned the president. In polls, independent voters now track mostly with Democrats. And, analysts say, once someone loses confidence in the conduct of a war, it is exceedingly difficult to woo them back.

"[Bush's] best option is bringing peace and security to Iraq," says Darrell West, a political scientist at Brown University. "If he can accomplish that, people will think the war's going well and that he made the right decision. But that's proving almost impossible to achieve."

Pollster Daniel Yankelovich, writing in the September/October 2005 issue of Foreign Affairs magazine, states that "in my judgment the Bush administration has about a year before the public's impatience will force it to change course."

Not helping the president has been the modern phenomenon of 24/7 cable news coverage, which brings instant magnification to the daily death toll and the longstanding media practice of focusing on negative developments.

And there is the lingering public memory of Vietnam itself, which, in the Iraq war, may have made the public warier sooner of getting stuck in a quagmire.

Scholars like Mueller at Ohio State speak of an emerging "Iraq syndrome" that will have consequences for US foreign policy long after American forces pull out - particularly in Washington's ability to deal forcefully with other countries it views as threatening, such as North Korea and Iran.

"Iraq syndrome" seems to be playing out, too, with the American public. The just-released quadrennial survey of American attitudes toward foreign policy - produced jointly by the Pew Research Center and the Council on Foreign Relations - shows a revival of isolationism. Now, 42 percent of Americans say the US should "mind its own business internationally and let other countries get along the best they can on their own" - up from 30 percent in 2002.

According to Pew Research Center director Andrew Kohut, that 42 percent figure is also similar to how the US public felt in the mid-1970s, at the end of the Vietnam War, and in the 1990s, at the end of the cold war.


SOURCE: THE GALLUP ORGANIZATION; RICH CLABAUGH - STAFF
Snuffysmith
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10118732/site/newsweek/

Intel: Iran Won't Need an Exit Strategy
By Scott Johnson and Michael Hirsh
Newsweek
Confrontations don't seem to bother Mowaffaq al-Rubaie. After Saddam Hussein was found hiding in a rathole in late 2003, Rubaie was the only senior Iraqi official to call the ex-dictator a coward to his face. And last week, after a dangerous overland journey to Tehran, Rubaie went head-to-head with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's fiery Islamist president. One of Rubaie's key messages to his fellow Shiite: stop stirring up trouble. Rubaie, Iraq's national-security adviser, and other Iraqi officials chastised Iran for supporting Shiite militias and aggravating the insurgency. More gently, they asked for Tehran's help. Mainly the Iraqis demonstrated that, at a strategic level, they are thinking about what their country could look like after the Americans leave.

Rubaie returned home on Friday with what he regards as an important prize: a memorandum of understanding with Tehran that commits the two governments to cooperate on sensitive intelligence-sharing matters, counterterrorism and cross-border infiltration of Qaeda figures. Yet Rubaie's bold diplomacy took even the powerful U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, by surprise. Khalilzad told NEWSWEEK in a telephone interview that he found out about the agreement only afterward. The diplomatic confusion shows that Iraq remains in a shaky state of limbo, somewhere between independence and occupation.

"It's not clear whether [Rubaie] has authority to negotiate that or not," added a senior American official involved with Iraq policy, who spoke on condition he not be identified. Rubaie, who plans to run for prime minister next month, insists he was acting with the authority of Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari, who is expected to ratify the agreement soon. Rubaie notes he was accompanied on his mission by top Iraqi intelligence and security officials.

The Americans and Rubaie do agree on one thing: Iranian interference continues to haunt future scenarios for an independent, stable Iraq. Khalilzad, echoing other U.S. officials, said he is hoping for a "significant withdrawal" of U.S. troops from Iraq next year. But the Bush administration worries that a fractured Iraq under weak leadership will be Tehran's playground, a place where rabid anti-Americans like Ahmadinejad can continue to sap U.S. strength, diverting Washington from its efforts to confront Iran over its own nuclear plans. Already many Iraqis are convinced that Iranian intelligence provides key support to Shiite militias. Some see Iranian hands in the torture chambers discovered last week beneath an Interior Ministry compound, which was run by Shiite officials allegedly linked to Tehran.

While most of Iraq's insurgents are Sunni, there is considerable evidence that Shiite Iran is helping to prolong the conflict. Khalilzad says that Tehran's "short-term goal may be to keep the U.S. preoccupied in Iraq while it's advancing its long-term goal of establishing [regional] domination." Some Western officials believe the new, shaped bombs being used against Coalition forces with deadly effect—called "explosively formed projectiles" or EFPs—are made to the exact design perfected by Iranian intelligence and supplied to Lebanese Hizbullah in the 1980s. According to a senior security source in Iraq's Maysan province, the Iranians have also been supplying one of the Shiite militias, the Mahdi Army, with surface-to-air missiles.

The area along the 1,200-mile border between the two countries, once littered with tens of thousands of bodies after the 1980s Iran-Iraq war, continues to be a dangerous no man's land. The Iraqi delegation's 20-car convoy from the border to Baghdad, traveling at well over 100mph for long stretches, proved just how hazardous this corner of Iraq still is. (A NEWSWEEK reporter accompanied the delegation from the border crossing.) Along the way, guards from the convoy shot at some cars and forced others off the road. There were several Iraqi Army checkpoints—a signal of the increased presence of the nation's security forces—but also what appeared to be at least three ad hoc checkpoints that looked to be illegal.

The Iraqis and Iranians signed the diplomatic memo after three days of all-night negotiations in which senior officials bickered over many topics. Among them: whether the Iraqis would agree to single out the controversial anti-Tehran group based in Iraq, the Mujahedin-e Khalq, in the wording of the memorandum (Rubaie refused); and whether Iran would acknowledge its role in supporting Hizbullah activities in Iraq. After an angry denial, Tehran did finally sign on to language that states "both countries should stop any support of groups, official or non-official, including proxies" that cause trouble. The Iranians "were adamant [at first]," says Rubaie. "They didn't want to sign." But the clause was so important to the Iraqis that one of their delegation stayed until 5 in the morning to ensure that the language was included in the final draft.

Iraqi officials are all too aware of how deeply Iran has infiltrated Baghdad. Some assert that a special unit controlled by a man named Ahmed al-Mohandiss, with ties to Iran, abused the prisoners in the Interior Ministry facility. Last week, as the government was launching a promised investigation into alleged torture at the Jadriyah jail, three senior Iraqi officials told NEWSWEEK that Mohandiss was now in Iran. "He is certainly one of the people who, if we find him, there are a few questions we'd like him to answer," Rubaie says.

The Iraqis also met resistance on other issues—principally how to handle the Great Satan. Iraqi officials said they were struck by how skittish Iran remains about the continued American presence in its backyard. When one of the Iraqi delegates invited Iran's new president to visit Iraq, as thousands of Iraqi pilgrims have done over the past two years, Ahmadinejad told him, "We can't be in the same place as the Americans are. The Americans have to leave before I can come." Afterward, on the trip back to Baghdad, the official observed: "They're obsessed with the Americans. They're really obsessed." That's exactly what has everyone so worried. Still, the Iraqis believe that the implicit message they had to deliver to Tehran—the sooner you stick to the agreement, the sooner the Americans will depart—may be their only leverage.

With Owen Matthews in Maysan
Snuffysmith
http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news2/nyt096.html

November 20, 2005
Widespread Violence Kills Dozens Across Iraq

By EDWARD WONG
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Nov. 20 - The Marine Corps said today that 15 Iraqi civilians and a United States marine were killed on Saturday when a roadside bomb exploded in the town of Haditha, 140 miles northwest of Baghdad. At least 11 other Iraqis were killed or discovered dead today in various incidents, and military officials reported the deaths of two more Americans and a British soldier.

The deaths capped one of the deadliest three-day periods since the American invasion. In all, at least 155 Iraqis and 7 foreign soldiers have been killed in a spate of bombings and assaults that began Friday morning, when jihadists tried using two trucks packed with explosives to demolish a Baghdad hotel full of Western journalists.

That attack was followed by a pair of suicide bombings in two mosques in the northern Kurdish town of Khanaqin that left at least 80 dead and more than 100 wounded.

It is unclear what exactly provoked this series of attacks, but several factors could be stirring the anger of the Sunni-led insurgency. Last week, the American military announced that soldiers had discovered 169 malnourished, mostly Sunni Arab detainees in a secret police prison in Baghdad run by the Shiite-led Interior Ministry. The interior minister, Bayan Jabr, tried to play down the discovery, but admitted that seven of the detainees had been tortured.

In the northern city of Mosul, a senior police officer said a house raided on Saturday by the Iraqi police and American soldiers may have been a base for Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, the militant group led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

The officer, Brig. Gen. Muhammad al-Wagaa, said the Iraqi police surrounded the house after interrogating an insurgent captured on Friday. A fierce gun battle erupted, he said, and the police called for assistance from the American military.

The insurgents then detonated a ready-to-use car bomb in the house, General Wagaa said. The blast killed 11 people inside, he said, and Iraqi and American forces captured four people. One of the dead insurgents, the general added, was a woman wearing an amulet around her neck that proclaimed her a martyr.

The general did not have any information about whether Mr. Zarqawi might have been in the house or linked to the people there. An American military spokesman said tonight that the Americans had no details related to Mr. Zarqawi.

In western Baghdad today, hundreds of people, most of them Sunni Arabs, protested the abuse and torture of detainees. Several Sunni political groups and the top United Nations human rights official have called for an international inquiry into incidents of torture at the Baghdad prison.

The recent attacks may have also been partly sparked by the approach of the Dec. 15 elections for a four-year Parliament, which is then expected to appoint a government. American commanders have warned that violence will be on the rise in the period leading up to the elections. Last January, the week of the elections for a transitional assembly was one of the bloodiest in the two-and-a-half-year-old war.

The most devastating attacks have been aimed at Shiites, who make up at least 60 percent of the population and, after years of domination by Saddam Hussein and his fellow Sunni Arabs, have taken the reins of power in the transitional government. The religious Shiite parties are expected to come away from the Dec. 15 elections with the most significant bloc in the Parliament.

Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the most influential Shiite cleric in Iraq, has called for restraint in the face of insurgent attacks on the Shiite populace, but it is unclear how long he will adhere to his policy of tolerance, given the rising anger among Shiites.

The bombing in Haditha on Saturday was aimed at a convoy of American marines and Iraqi soldiers, a Marine spokesman, Capt. Jeffrey S. Pool, said. After the explosion, gunmen opened fire on the convoy. At least eight insurgents were killed in the firefight, the captain said.

Haditha sits on the Euphrates River in the Sunni-dominated province of Anbar. Since last spring, marines have conducted offensive sweeps of a dozen or so towns along the river, in hopes of disrupting the smuggling of foreign fighters from the Syrian border into Iraq. In almost all the cases, the insurgents fled from the towns in advance of the Americans. The latest operation began on Nov. 5 in the town of Husayba, right up against the Syrian border, and met more resistance than usual.

South of Baghdad today, a car bomb exploded by a convoy carrying the mayor of Madaen, killing five civilians. The mayor was unharmed. Madaen is one of a belt of volatile towns ringing Baghdad where violence is particularly rampant between Shiites and Sunnis. Recently, Shiites have been moving into Madaen, while Sunnis have been leaving out of fear of reprisal.

In the Sadr City neighborhood of Baghdad, the police discovered three bodies, all blindfolded, handcuffed and shot in the head, an Interior Ministry official said. A headless body was found off a highway south of Baghdad. A policeman was shot dead in the capital. A roadside bomb explosion in Baghdad killed a child and wounded five others.

The American military said a soldier was killed by small-arms fire while on patrol north of Baghdad, and a marine died of wounds received during a firefight on Saturday in the western town of Karma.

British officials said one of their soldiers was killed in a roadside bomb explosion near the southern city of Basra.

British soldiers in the south have come under increasing attack from Shiite fighters linked to Moktada al-Sadr, a radical Shiite cleric who ignited two rebellions against the American-led forces last year.

British officers say the Shiite guerillas also have ties to Iran, but it is unclear whether the Iranian government itself is sponsoring the attacks.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
Snuffysmith
Iraqi Shi'i, Kurdish, Sunni Leaders All Agreed in Cairo There Should Be Timetable of Withdrawal of Foreign Forces, Supported Resistance, Condemned Terrorism

Iraqis Say There Should Be Troop Timetable

By SALAH NASRAWI Associated Press Writer

Nov 21, 2005, 11:30 AM EST

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- Leaders of Iraq's sharply divided Shiites, Kurds and Sunnis, seeking common ground for their political future together, agreed Monday there should be a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops, and that resistance was the right of all - but that acts of terror should be condemned.

After hours of negotiations at the Arab League, the participants in a national accord conference reached a final statement aimed at showing the points of agreement between the communities.

The three-day gathering was held to prepare for a wider conference due to be held in February in Iraq, part of a U.S.-backed Arab League attempt to bring the communities closer together and assure Sunni Arab participation in a political process now dominated by Iraq's Shi'i majority and large Kurdish minority.

The participants in Cairo agreed on "calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops according to a timetable, through putting in place an immediate national program to rebuild the armed forces ... control the borders and the security situation" and end terror attacks.

"The Iraqi people are looking forward to the day when the foreign forces will leave Iraq, when its armed and security forces will be rebuilt and when they can enjoy peace and stability and get rid of terrorism," the statement said.

Sunni leaders have been pressing the Shi'i-majority government to agree to a timetable for the withdrawal of all foreign troops. The statement recognized that goal, but did not lay down a specific time - reflecting instead the government's stance that Iraqi security forces must be built up first (which is basically the US position).

On Monday, Iraqi Interior Minister Bayan Jabr suggested U.S.-led forces should able to leave Iraq by the end of next year, saying the one-year extension of the mandate for multinational force in Iraq by the U.N. Security Council earlier this month could be the last.

"By mid next year we will be 75 percent done in building our forces and by the end of next year it will be fully ready," he told the Arab satellite station Al-Jazeera.

The conference's final statement also stated that "resistance is a legitimate right for all people" - a nod to Sunni Arab leaders who have sought to distinguish Iraqi resistance fighters they say are resisting the U.S. presence in Iraq from terrorism.

But the statement added, "Terrorism is not legitimate resistance and thus we condemn terrorism and the acts of violence, killings and kidnappings that target Iraqi citizens; civil, governmental and humanitarian organizations; national wealth and houses of worships. We ask that they be immediately confronted."

The Cairo meeting was marred by differences between participants at times and at one point saw Shi'i and Kurdish delegates storm out of a closed session when one of the speakers said they had sold out to the Americans.

A major goal of the conference was to resolve who can attend the wider gathering in February. Shi'is have been skeptical of the conference from the start and strongly opposed participation by Sunni Arab officials from the former Saddam regime or from pro-resistance groups.

The statement also stressed the participants commitment to the Iraq's unity. It called for releasing all "innocent detainees" who have not been convicted by courts and asked that allegations of torture be investigated and those responsible be held accountable.

The statement also demanded "an immediate stop to arbitrary raids and arrests without a documented judicial order."

Participants asked the Arab countries to support Iraq by eliminating or reducing its debts and strengthening the Arab diplomatic presence in Baghdad.
Snuffysmith
Iraqi leaders demand timetable for troop withdrawal

By Agence France Presse

Iraqi leaders reached a tentative agreement Monday to demand a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops from their war-torn country during talks ahead of a reconciliation conference to be held next year.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11102.htm
Snuffysmith
Rumsfeld Calls For Substantive, Mindful Iraq Debate
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iraq-05zzzzzze.html

Washington (SPX) Nov 22, 2005 - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld acknowledged that a spirited debate about the Iraq War is justified; however, he urged that this debate be substantive, factually based and mindful of its real-world consequences.
Snuffysmith
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/...tem/itemID/9951

American Majority Criticizes Bush’s Handling of Iraq

(Angus Reid Global Scan) – Many adults in the United States remain dissatisfied with George W. Bush’s approach to the coalition effort, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 51 per cent of respondents rate the president’s handling of the situation in Iraq as poor.

The coalition effort against Saddam Hussein’s regime was launched in March 2003. At least 2,095 American soldiers have died during the military operation, and more than 15,500 troops have been injured.

On Nov. 17, Democratic Pennsylvania congressman John Murtha—a Vietnam War veteran—introduced a bill seeking the withdrawal of U.S. troops stationed in Iraq "at the earliest practicable date." Yesterday, Murtha defended his call, saying, "The public turned against this war before I said it. The public is emotionally tied into finding a solution to this thing, and that’s what I hope this administration is going to find out.’’

On Nov. 20, U.S. president George W. Bush called Murtha "a fine man, a good man, who served our country with honour and distinction," adding, "I disagree with his position. An immediate withdrawal of our troops from Iraq will only strengthen the terrorists’ hand in Iraq, and in the broader war on terror. That’s the goal of the enemy."

Yesterday in a speech to the American Enterprise Institute, U.S. vice-president Dick Cheney defended the Bush administration’s decision to go to war, adding, "The flaws in the intelligence are plain enough in hindsight. But any suggestion that pre-war information was distorted, hyped or fabricated by the leader of the nation is utterly false."

Polling Data

How would you rate U.S. president George W. Bush’s handling of the situation in Iraq?

Excellent
16%

Good
17%

Fair
15%

Poor
51%



Source: Rasmussen Reports
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,000 American adults, conducted on Nov. 16 and Nov. 17, 2005. Margin of error is 3 per cent.
Snuffysmith
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/899...49D15893ECE.htm

Iran urges Iraq to set pullout timetable

Tuesday 22 November 2005, 18:56 Makka Time, 15:56 GMT
Khamenei ® called on Talabani to press for a timetable

Iran's spiritual leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has called on visiting Iraqi President Jalal Talabani to press for a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops from Iraq.

On Tuesday, Khamenei also argued it was the US that was to blame for the ongoing violence in Iraq, amid efforts by Talabani to win Iranian help in combatting the fighting ravaging his country.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran holds the American government responsible for the suffering of the Iraqi people and all the crimes and assassinations now being committed in Iraq," Khamenei was quoted as saying by official media.

"The presence of foreign troops is damaging for the Iraqis, and the Iraqi government could ask for their departure by proposing a timetable," Khamenei said, adding: "The US and Britain will eventually have to leave Iraq with a bitter experience."

Khamenei told Talabani, the first Iraqi head of state to visit Iran in nearly four decades, his country "would be empowered by the development, security, independence and the empowerment of Iraq".

Ties between Iran and Iraq's new authorities have been close, with Baghdad's new government dominated by Iranian-backed Kurdish figures such as Talabani and Shia parties that were backed by Tehran during Saddam Hussein's rule.

Key number

Iraqi political analyst Awni al-Qalamchi said the Iranian statements are designed to tell the US that Iran is a key player in Iraqi politics.

Iran-backed Shia have dominated
Iraqi politics since the invasion

"Iran helped the US occupying Iraq, just like other Arab countries, hoping to benefit politically and financially," he told Aljazeera.net.


"It gained great influence in Iraq when all the political parties it backs ascended to power.



"But when the US realised Iran had become more influential than it should be, it tried to put limits to it.

"Khamenei's statements aim to tell the Americans that Iran is still there and can cause you a headache in Iraq.

"I think Khamenei's statement does not reflect Iran's real position and ambitions in Iraq."

Deal

Despite Talabani's statements denying Iran's involvement in Iraq's internal issues, the visit is seen as an attempt to put more pressure on Tehran, whose relations with the US have come to a standstill because of Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Talabani and Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad denied in joint statements the US-UK accusation that Iran is interfering in Iraq's internal affairs.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran holds the American government responsible for the suffering of the Iraqi people and all the crimes and assassinations now being committed in Iraq"

Ali Khamenei,
Iran's spiritual leader

Talabani said he is confident Iran will provide Iraq with essential help in combatting "terrorism in Iraq".

"Iraq's President Jalal Talabani does not enjoy the freedom to make his own decisions. We all know that he cannot make any move without US approval," Iraqi political analyst Fadil al-Rubei told Aljazeera.net.

"What is the secret behind promoting Iran's innocence from the US's accusations? I believe that it is a deal.

"The US will help polishing Iran's stained image among Iraqis, in return Iran would send its murderers and killing squads to fight the Iraqi resistance in Falluja and other western Iraqi cities," he said.

Support

Ali al-Awsie, a member of the ruling Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI), hailed Khamenei's statement, stressing it reflected the hopes of every Iraqi.

"Khamenei's statements come after the Iraqi national reconciliation conference in Cairo, where all Iraqi factions agreed on asking the US occupation for a withdrawal timetable," he told Aljazeera.net.

But the Iranian-backed SCIRI and other ruling parties in Iraq do not want foreign troops to leave before powerful and effective Iraqi forces are deployed.

"We seek effective guarantees that the situation will be properly maintained after the occupation troops are gone," al-Awsie said.

Aljazeera.net's Ahmed Janabi contributed to this report.
Snuffysmith
Iraqi Leaders Call for Pullout Timetable

By SALAH NASRAWI

CAIRO, Egypt -- Iraqi leaders at a reconciliation conference reached out to the Sunni Arab community by calling for a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S.-led forces and saying the country's opposition had a "legitimate right" of resistance.

A day after the communique was finalized by Iraqi Shiite, Kurdish and Sunni leaders, Washington reiterated Tuesday that the United States would stay only as long as it takes to stabilize Iraq.

The communique condemned terrorism but was a clear acknowledgment of the Sunni position that insurgents should not be labeled as terrorists if they don't target innocent civilians or institutions that provide for the welfare of Iraqis.

The leaders agreed on "calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops according to a timetable, through putting in place an immediate national program to rebuild the armed forces ... control the borders and the security situation" and end terror attacks.

The preparatory reconciliation conference, held under the auspices of the Arab League, was attended by Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and Iraqi Shiite and Kurdish lawmakers as well as leading Sunni politicians.

Sunni leaders have been pressing the Shiite-majority government to agree to a timetable for the withdrawal of all foreign troops. The statement recognized that goal, but did not lay down a specific time _ reflecting instead the government's stance that Iraqi security forces must be built up first.

On Monday, Iraqi Interior Minister Bayan Jabr suggested U.S.-led forces should be able to leave Iraq by the end of next year, saying the one-year extension of the mandate for the multinational force in Iraq by the U.N. Security Council this month could be the last.

"By the middle of next year we will be 75 percent done in building our forces and by the end of next year it will be fully ready," he told the Arab satellite station Al-Jazeera.

On Tuesday, the State Department "the United States supports the ongoing transitional political process in Iraq, and encourages participation by all Iraqis in the political process."

"President Bush has made our position very clear," department spokeswoman Julie Reside said. "The coalition remains committed to helping the Iraqi people achieve stability and security as they rebuild their country. We will stay as long as it takes to achieve those goals and no longer."

Debate in Washington over when to bring troops home turned bitter last week after decorated Vietnam War vet Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., called for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, and estimated a pullout could be complete within six months. Republicans rejected Murtha's position.

In Egypt, the final communique's attempt to define terrorism omitted any reference to attacks against U.S. or Iraqi forces. Delegates from across the political and religious spectrum said the omission was intentional. They spoke anonymously, saying they feared retribution.

"Though resistance is a legitimate right for all people, terrorism does not represent resistance. Therefore, we condemn terrorism and acts of violence, killing and kidnapping targeting Iraqi citizens and humanitarian, civil, government institutions, national resources and houses of worships," the document said.

The final communique also stressed participants' commitment to Iraq's unity and called for the release of all "innocent detainees" who have not been convicted. It asked that allegations of torture against prisoners be investigated and those responsible be held accountable.

The statement also demanded "an immediate end to arbitrary raids and arrests without a documented judicial order."

The communique included no means for implementing its provisions, leaving it unclear what it will mean in reality other than to stand as a symbol of a first step toward bringing the feuding parties together in an agreement in principle.

"We are committed to this statement as far as it is in the best interests of the Iraqi people," said Harith al-Dhari, leader of the powerful Association of Muslim Scholars, a hard-line Sunni group. He said he had reservations about the document as a whole, and delegates said he had again expressed strong opposition to the concept of federalism enshrined in Iraq's new constitution.

The gathering was part of a U.S.-backed league attempt to bring the communities closer together and assure Sunni Arab participation in a political process now dominated by Iraq's Shiite majority and large Kurdish minority.

The conference also decided on broad conditions for selecting delegates to a wider reconciliation gathering in the last week of February or the first week of March in Iraq. It essentially opens the way for all those who are willing to renounce violence against fellow Iraqis.

Shiites had been strongly opposed to participation in the conference by Sunni Arab officials from the regime of Saddam Hussein or from pro-insurgency groups. That objection seemed to have been glossed over in the communique.

The Cairo meeting was marred by differences between participants at times, and at one point Shiite and Kurdish delegates stormed out of a closed session when one of the speakers said they had sold out to the Americans.


Would you like to send this article to a friend? Go to
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/e...er=emailarticle
Snuffysmith
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle...ticle328526.ece
Iraq's oil: The spoils of war
By Philip Thornton, Economics Correspondent
Published: 22 November 2005

Iraqis face the dire prospect of losing up to $200bn (£116bn) of the wealth of their country if an American-inspired plan to hand over development of its oil reserves to US and British multinationals comes into force next year. A report produced by American and British pressure groups warns Iraq will be caught in an "old colonial trap" if it allows foreign companies to take a share of its vast energy reserves. The report is certain to reawaken fears that the real purpose of the 2003 war on Iraq was to ensure its oil came under Western control.

The Iraqi government has announced plans to seek foreign investment to exploit its oil reserves after the general election, which will be held next month. Iraq has 115 billion barrels of proved oil reserves, the third largest in the world.

According to the report, from groups including War on Want and the New Economics Foundation (NEF), the new Iraqi constitution opened the way for greater foreign investment. Negotiations with oil companies are already under way ahead of next month's election and before legislation is passed, it said.

The groups said they had amassed details of high-level pressure from the US and UK governments on Iraq to look to foreign companies to rebuild its oil industry. It said a Foreign Office code of practice issued in summer last year said at least $4bn would be needed to restore production to the levels before the 1990-91 Gulf War. "Given Iraq's needs it is not realistic to cut government spending in other areas and Iraq would need to engage with the international oil companies to provide appropriate levels of foreign direct investment to do this," it said.

Yesterday's report said the use of production sharing agreements (PSAs) was proposed by the US State Department before the invasion and adopted by the Coalition Provisional Authority. "The current government is fast-tracking the process. It is already negotiating contracts with oil companies in parallel with the constitutional process, elections and passage of a Petroleum Law," the report, Crude Designs, said.

Earlier this year a BBC Newsnight report claimed to have uncovered documents showing the Bush administration made plans to secure Iraqi oil even before the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US. Based on its analysis of PSAs in seven countries, it said multinationals would seek rates of return on their investment from 42 to 162 per cent, far in excess of typical 12 per cent rates.

Taking an assumption of $40 a barrel, below the current price of almost $60, and a likely contract term of 25 to 40 years, it said that Iraq stood to lose between £74bn and $194bn. Andrew Simms, the NEF's policy director, said: "Over the last century, Britain and the US left a global trail of conflict, social upheaval and environmental damage as they sought to capture and control a disproportionate share of the world's oil reserves. Now it seems they are determined to increase their ecological debts at Iraq's expense. Instead of a new beginning, Iraq is caught in a very old colonial trap."

Louise Richards, chief executive of War on Want, said: "People have increasingly come to realise the Iraq war was about oil, profits and plunder. Despite claims from politicians that this is a conspiracy theory, our report gives detailed evidence to show Iraq's oil profits are well within the sights of the oil multinationals."

The current Iraqi government has indicated that it wants to treble production from two million barrels a day this year to six million. The US Energy Information Administration said such an increase would ease "market tensions" that have kept the price high. But governments and oil companies in the West said the report was purely hypothetical and that the issue was a matter for the Iraqi people. They also pointed out that Iraq needed money to rebuild in the sector.

A spokesman for the Foreign Office said the country's oil industry was in desperate need of investment after years of under-investment, UN sanctions, vandalism by Saddam Hussein and more recent sabotage by insurgents and general looting. "The Iraqi government has made it clear that the decision is a matter for its authorities but they understand that it would require a lot of investment," he said. He said it was not surprising that Iraq should look to outside experts to help rebuild an industry that was the key source of revenue to help rebuild the country.

"We work closely with other departments such as the Treasury to give assistance and advice," he said, adding that the Foreign Office had not been involved in specific lobbying.

Gregg Muttitt, of Platform, a campaign group that co-authored the report, said Iraq had an existing - albeit damaged - network of oil expertise and could use current revenues or new borrowings to fund investment. The report named several companies, including the Anglo-Dutch Shell group, as jockeying for position before a new government is elected. In 2003, Walter van de Vijver, then head of exploration and production, said investors would need "some assurance of future income and a supportive contractual arrangement". The groupsaidyesterday that the involvement of foreign oil companies would be determined by the new Iraqi administration. "We aspire to establish a long-term presence in Iraq and a long-term relationship with the Iraqis, including the newly elected government."

No multinationals are operating in Iraq now because of the poor security situation.

Iraqis face the dire prospect of losing up to $200bn (£116bn) of the wealth of their country if an American-inspired plan to hand over development of its oil reserves to US and British multinationals comes into force next year. A report produced by American and British pressure groups warns Iraq will be caught in an "old colonial trap" if it allows foreign companies to take a share of its vast energy reserves. The report is certain to reawaken fears that the real purpose of the 2003 war on Iraq was to ensure its oil came under Western control.

The Iraqi government has announced plans to seek foreign investment to exploit its oil reserves after the general election, which will be held next month. Iraq has 115 billion barrels of proved oil reserves, the third largest in the world.

According to the report, from groups including War on Want and the New Economics Foundation (NEF), the new Iraqi constitution opened the way for greater foreign investment. Negotiations with oil companies are already under way ahead of next month's election and before legislation is passed, it said.

The groups said they had amassed details of high-level pressure from the US and UK governments on Iraq to look to foreign companies to rebuild its oil industry. It said a Foreign Office code of practice issued in summer last year said at least $4bn would be needed to restore production to the levels before the 1990-91 Gulf War. "Given Iraq's needs it is not realistic to cut government spending in other areas and Iraq would need to engage with the international oil companies to provide appropriate levels of foreign direct investment to do this," it said.

Yesterday's report said the use of production sharing agreements (PSAs) was proposed by the US State Department before the invasion and adopted by the Coalition Provisional Authority. "The current government is fast-tracking the process. It is already negotiating contracts with oil companies in parallel with the constitutional process, elections and passage of a Petroleum Law," the report, Crude Designs, said.

Earlier this year a BBC Newsnight report claimed to have uncovered documents showing the Bush administration made plans to secure Iraqi oil even before the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US. Based on its analysis of PSAs in seven countries, it said multinationals would seek rates of return on their investment from 42 to 162 per cent, far in excess of typical 12 per cent rates.

Taking an assumption of $40 a barrel, below the current price of almost $60, and a likely contract term of 25 to 40 years, it said that Iraq stood to lose between £74bn and $194bn. Andrew Simms, the NEF's policy director, said: "Over the last century, Britain and the US left a global trail of conflict, social upheaval and environmental damage as they sought to capture and control a disproportionate share of the world's oil reserves. Now it seems they are determined to increase their ecological debts at Iraq's expense. Instead of a new beginning, Iraq is caught in a very old colonial trap."
Louise Richards, chief executive of War on Want, said: "People have increasingly come to realise the Iraq war was about oil, profits and plunder. Despite claims from politicians that this is a conspiracy theory, our report gives detailed evidence to show Iraq's oil profits are well within the sights of the oil multinationals."

The current Iraqi government has indicated that it wants to treble production from two million barrels a day this year to six million. The US Energy Information Administration said such an increase would ease "market tensions" that have kept the price high. But governments and oil companies in the West said the report was purely hypothetical and that the issue was a matter for the Iraqi people. They also pointed out that Iraq needed money to rebuild in the sector.

A spokesman for the Foreign Office said the country's oil industry was in desperate need of investment after years of under-investment, UN sanctions, vandalism by Saddam Hussein and more recent sabotage by insurgents and general looting. "The Iraqi government has made it clear that the decision is a matter for its authorities but they understand that it would require a lot of investment," he said. He said it was not surprising that Iraq should look to outside experts to help rebuild an industry that was the key source of revenue to help rebuild the country.

"We work closely with other departments such as the Treasury to give assistance and advice," he said, adding that the Foreign Office had not been involved in specific lobbying.

Gregg Muttitt, of Platform, a campaign group that co-authored the report, said Iraq had an existing - albeit damaged - network of oil expertise and could use current revenues or new borrowings to fund investment. The report named several companies, including the Anglo-Dutch Shell group, as jockeying for position before a new government is elected. In 2003, Walter van de Vijver, then head of exploration and production, said investors would need "some assurance of future income and a supportive contractual arrangement". The groupsaidyesterday that the involvement of foreign oil companies would be determined by the new Iraqi administration. "We aspire to establish a long-term presence in Iraq and a long-term relationship with the Iraqis, including the newly elected government."

No multinationals are operating in Iraq now because of the poor security situation.
Snuffysmith
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1123/p01s02-woiq.html
November 23, 2005 edition

New Iraq strategy: Stay in hot spots

To keep insurgents from retaking towns, US troops are now setting up local camps.

By Scott Peterson | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

FALLUJAH, IRAQ – As US Marines battle insurgents in a string of towns in Iraq's western Anbar Province, they are applying lessons learned from their experience in Fallujah: Flush out insurgents, then stay there.
Some of those farming towns, along the Euphrates River, have been cleared and cleared again up to three times during the past year, as militants reestablish their grip when US and Iraqi forces depart.


Now marines are setting up temporary camp in these remote outposts - just as they did here in Fallujah a year ago, when marines cleared the city of Al Qaeda and nationalist insurgents, who had turned the city into a haven for kidnapping gangs and a launching pad for suicide attacks on Baghdad.

The key lesson from the Fallujah battle? "Go and stay," says Col. Dave Berger, commander of Regimental Combat Team 8. "The worst thing you can do is go and then leave. If you go, get something done and leave, each time you leave you lose [the Iraqis'] trust"

It was Fallujah where the US military decided to set a precedent in Iraq, hoping that a full-scale offensive - which heavily damaged the city - followed by a carefully controlled return of the 300,000 residents, would undermine the insurgency.

During that offensive last November, some US forces controversially used white phosphorus incendiary rounds against insurgent strongholds. But US officials deny reports that they targeted civilians.

Berger calls Fallujah today a test-case "biosphere." Since the offensive the city has been ringed with a half-dozen checkpoints, open only to residents with special identity cards. Americans have controlled variables here, like nowhere else in Iraq.

But the line is fine between having a security presence and helping rebuild a sustainable economy and infrastructure, as marines are attempting here. And while Fallujah may be reporting some success, it has also received the most US attention and forces; a fact that can't be duplicated in every trouble spot.

"It's going to be hard to convince [Iraqis] we're going to stay this time" in other towns, says Colonel Berger, a Farnham, Va., native who spent last year atthe Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies, and still keeps in touch with security experts there.

Another senior Marine officer, speaking off the record, estimated it would take twice as many marines on the ground to copy the Fallujah model everywhere. Currently there are 22,000 US Marines in western Iraq. And such a boost in manpower might not be advisable, considering the different circumstances of each town.

"We are always going to be viewed by many Iraqis as an occupation force, and we can't change that perception," says Berger. "The best we can do is ... make our signature lower and lower."

The price of a steady presence has been high. One marine and 15 Iraqi civilians were killed Saturday by a roadside bomb in Haditha, the 2nd Marine Division said Monday. It noted that eight insurgents were also killed, and that in October marines had launched assaults there and in Barwana and Haqlaniyah "to establish bases to maintain a long-term security presence."

Likewise, marine units that began a new US-Iraqi offensive, Operation Steel Curtain, on Nov. 5 quickly set up temporary bases in Husayba, Karabila,and Obeidi as they took towns from militants.

The Pentagon is planning to issue a directive that will codify that strategy, by turning "what it calls 'stability operations' into a core military mission comparable to full-scale combat," The New York Times reported Sunday.

There have been no announced plans to increase the overall number of US forces in Iraq. But the Fallujah strategy of "go and stay" is a mind-set that is already filtering down to combat units that are trained to kill an enemy. Marines interviewed say that progress on civil affairs is an equally important metric of success in places like Fallujah - and that winning the peace often proves more difficult than winning the war.

"Once you take a city, you've got to go through it slowly and clear it," says Capt. William Grube, commander of Fox Company, of the 2nd Battalion, 6th Marine Regiment, whose unit lives in and helps patrol the city. He says previous operations in Anbar Province, where US and Iraqi forces attacked and then withdrew, were simply "playing whack-a-mole."

"At some point, you need to take it, and sit there, and hold it for real," says Captain Grube, from Emmaus, Pa. In Fallujah, "the longer we have the place stable, the more chance there is to undermine support for insurgents."

"When you look at the near term, of course it is going to be negative," says Grube, about Fallujan views of how badly damaged their city was by the offensive. So he takes the long view - one that many Iraqis remain uncertain about.

"I don't think they will wake up one day and say, 'I'm all for transparency and the rights of man,'" says Grube. "We have to show by example that you can be powerful, but not a brutal conqueror."

That label is often applied to US forces in Fallujah by residents of this Sunni city that once gave bedrock support to Saddam Hussein. "Fallujah, from day one [of the US attack] to now, is like a big prison - you have a time limit to get out, and to get in, and a [curfew] time you must sleep," says Sheikh Ahmed Sarhan Abd, deputy head of the Fallujah Sheikhs Council. "This emergency situation was supposed to last three or four months, not one year."

"We have not really seen happiness during the Eid [religious celebration]," says Sheikh Ahmed, who blames Iraqi police and army, as well as US forces. "If we want to go to the mosque, Iraqi forces stand at the doorway with guns. Yes, there are insurgents, but you can't put students and our sons in the same basket."
Snuffysmith
http://www.aljazeerah.info/News%20archives...0Occupation.htm

Iraqi Leaders Call for US Pullout Timetable, Acknowledge Resistance to the Occupation

By SALAH NASRAWI Associated Press Writer

Nov 22, 2005, 12:07 PM EST

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- Iraqi leaders at a reconciliation conference reached out to the Sunni Arab community by calling for a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S.-led forces and saying the country's opposition had a "legitimate right" of resistance.

A day after the communique was finalized by Iraqi Shi'i, Kurdish and Sunni leaders, Washington reiterated Tuesday that the United States would stay only as long as it takes to stabilize Iraq.

The communique condemned terrorism but was a clear acknowledgment of the Sunni position that Iraqi resistance fighters should not be labeled as terrorists if they don't target innocent civilians or institutions that provide for the welfare of Iraqis.

The leaders agreed on "calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops according to a timetable, through putting in place an immediate national program to rebuild the armed forces ... control the borders and the security situation" and end terror attacks.

The preparatory reconciliation conference, held under the auspices of the Arab League, was attended by Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and Iraqi Shi'i and Kurdish lawmakers as well as leading Sunni politicians.

Sunni leaders have been pressing the US-backed Shi'i-led government to agree to a timetable for the withdrawal of all foreign troops. The statement recognized that goal, but did not lay down a specific time - reflecting instead the government's stance that Iraqi security forces must be built up first.

On Monday, Iraqi Interior Minister Bayan Jabr suggested U.S.-led forces should be able to leave Iraq by the end of next year, saying the one-year extension of the mandate for the multinational force in Iraq by the U.N. Security Council this month could be the last.

"By the middle of next year we will be 75 percent done in building our forces and by the end of next year it will be fully ready," he told the Arab TV satellite station Al-Jazeera.

On Tuesday, the State Department said "the United States supports the ongoing transitional political process in Iraq, and encourages participation by all Iraqis in the political process."

"President Bush has made our position very clear," department spokeswoman Julie Reside said. "The coalition remains committed to helping the Iraqi people achieve stability and security as they rebuild their country. We will stay as long as it takes to achieve those goals and no longer."

Debate in Washington over when to bring troops home turned bitter last week after decorated Vietnam War vet Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., called for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, and estimated a pullout could be complete within six months. Republicans rejected Murtha's position.

In Egypt, the final communique's attempt to define terrorism omitted any reference to attacks against U.S. or Iraqi forces. Delegates from across the political and religious spectrum said the omission was intentional. They spoke anonymously, saying they feared retribution.

"Though resistance is a legitimate right for all people, terrorism does not represent resistance. Therefore, we condemn terrorism and acts of violence, killing and kidnapping targeting Iraqi citizens and humanitarian, civil, government institutions, national resources and houses of worships," the document said.

The final communique also stressed participants' commitment to Iraq's unity and called for the release of all "innocent detainees" who have not been convicted. It asked that allegations of torture against prisoners be investigated and those responsible be held accountable.

The statement also demanded "an immediate end to arbitrary raids and arrests without a documented judicial order."

The communique included no means for implementing its provisions, leaving it unclear what it will mean in reality other than to stand as a symbol of a first step toward bringing the feuding parties together in an agreement in principle.

"We are committed to this statement as far as it is in the best interests of the Iraqi people," said Harith al-Dhari, leader of the powerful Association of Muslim Scholars, a hard-line Sunni group. He said he had reservations about the document as a whole, and delegates said he had again expressed strong opposition to the concept of federalism enshrined in Iraq's new constitution.

The gathering was part of a U.S.-backed Arab League attempt to bring the communities closer together and assure Sunni Arab participation in a political process now dominated by the US-backed Shi'is and Kurds.

The conference also decided on broad conditions for selecting delegates to a wider reconciliation gathering in the last week of February or the first week of March in Iraq. It essentially opens the way for all those who are willing to renounce violence against fellow Iraqis.

Shi'is had been strongly opposed to participation in the conference by Sunni Arab officials from the regime of Saddam Hussein or from pro-resistance groups. That objection seemed to have been glossed over in the communique.

The Cairo meeting was marred by differences between participants at times, and at one point Shi'i and Kurdish delegates stormed out of a closed session when one of the speakers said they had sold out to the Americans.
Snuffysmith
More Wheels Spin Off Iraq Policy
Jim Lobe
WASHINGTON - In a major new blow to President George W. Bush's determination to "stay the course" in Iraq, an influential Democratic hawk with close ties to the uniformed military has called for Washington to begin withdrawing U.S. troops immediately.
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=31073
theglobalchinese
Warning over Jazeera bombing report Reuters
Britain has warned media organizations they are breaking the law if they publish details of a leaked document said to show US President George W. Bush wanted to bomb Arabic television station Al Jazeera. The government's top lawyer warned editors in a note after the Daily Mirror newspaper reported on Monday that a secret British government memo said British Prime Minister Tony Blair had talked Bush out of bombing the broadcaster in April last year. Several British newspapers reported the attorney general's note on Tuesday and repeated the Mirror's allegations, which the White House said were "so outlandish" they did not merit a response. Blair's office declined to comment. Al Jazeera, which has repeatedly denied U.S. accusations it sides with insurgents in Iraq, called on Britain and the United States to state quickly whether the report was accurate. "If the report is correct then this would be both shocking and worrisome not only to Al Jazeera but to media organizations across the world," the Qatar-based station said in a statement. The story would also be a shock for Qatar, a small Gulf state which cultivates good relations with Washington. The Mirror said the memo came from Blair's Downing Street office and turned up in May last year at the local office of Tony Clarke, then a member of parliament for the town of Northampton. Clarke handed the document back to the government. Leo O'Connor, who used to work for Clarke, and civil servant David Keogh were charged last Thursday under Britain's Official Secrets Act with making a "damaging disclosure of a document relating to international relations".

WHITE HOUSE SUMMIT
The Mirror said Bush told Blair at a White House summit on April 16 last year that he wanted to target Al Jazeera. The summit took place as U.S. forces in Iraq were launching a major assault on the insurgent stronghold of Fallujah. The paper quoted an unnamed government official suggesting Bush's threat was a joke but added another unidentified source saying the U.S. president was serious. White House spokesman Scott McClellan said: "We are not interested in dignifying something so outlandish and inconceivable with a response." The attorney general told media that publishing the contents of a document which is known to have been unlawfully disclosed by a civil servant was a breach of the Official Secrets Act. Kevin Maguire, the Mirror's associate editor, said government officials had given no indication of any legal problems with the story when contacted before publication. "We were astonished, 24 hours later, to be threatened with the Official Secrets Act and to be requested to give various undertakings to avoid being injuncted," he told BBC radio. Al Jazeera said that, if true, the story would raise serious doubts about the U.S. administration's version of previous incidents involving the station's journalists and offices. In 2001, the station's Kabul office was hit by U.S. bombs and in 2003 Al Jazeera reporter Tareq Ayyoub was killed in a U.S. strike on its Baghdad office. The United States has denied deliberately targeting the station.
Journalistic Bomb Washington Post
Bush Spoke of Attacking Arab News Channel, British Tabloid Says New York Times
Guardian Unlimited - The Age (subscription) - Collective Bellaciao - The Conservative Voice - all 287 related »
Snuffysmith
Iraq Troop Withdrawals Driven By Politics
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iraq-05zzzzzzj.html

Washington (UPI) Nov 22, 2005 - The U.S. military will recommend the number of troops that can be prudently withdrawn from Iraq - if any - but the final decision for the American military presence there will be up to policy officials in Washington. And they will consider political factors as well when they craft a final plan, a top U.S. general in Iraq said Tuesday.
Snuffysmith
Iraq Debate Normal In Democracy, Giambastiani Says
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iraq-05zzzzzzi.html
Snuffysmith
Outside View: Russia Back In Iraq
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iraq-05zzzzzzk.html
Snuffysmith
No Change In German Position On Iraq: Merkel
http://www.spacewar.com/news/iraq-05zzzzzzl.html
Snuffysmith
Iraq war may go for decades: report

From correspondents in London

The Oxford Research Group non-governmental organisation, which assesses constructive approaches to dealing with international terrorism and the "war on terror", says the war in Iraq is only in its early stages.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11125.htm
Snuffysmith
How Ragtag Insurgents Beat the World's Sole Superpower

By Ted Rall

As inexperienced weekend warriors shot up carloads of civilians from rooftops above invisible checkpoints, it soon became apparent that our forces were undereducated, poorly trained and excessively preoccupied with their own safety. The Americans' cultural insensitivity, often beyond the point of brutality, transformed people grateful to be liberated into insurgents in a matter of months.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11128.htm
Snuffysmith
Proof That Bush Lied

Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept From Hill Panel

By Murray Waas, special to National Journal

Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda, according to government records and current and former officials with firsthand knowledge of the matter.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11121.htm
Snuffysmith
Cheney: US never had burden of proof

By Times Of India

"We never had the burden of proof," he said, adding that it had been up to Iraqi president Saddam Hussein to prove to the world that he didn't have such weapons.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11123.htm
Snuffysmith
A plague on both their houses

By Patrick J. Buchanan

In invading Iraq, we attacked and occupied a country of 25 million that had not attacked us, did not threaten us, did not want war with us – to strip it of weapons we now know it did not have.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11127.htm
Snuffysmith
Sunni leader and 4 family members slain in Baghdad :

Armed attackers wearing Iraqi army uniforms have broken into the home of a senior Sunni leader and killed him, his three sons and his son-in-law on the outskirts of Baghdad, his brother and an interior ministry official said.
http://tinyurl.com/dcsrl
Snuffysmith
2 Iraqi's Killed At Communist Party Office:

Unidentified men broke into the party building and killed two activists in the reception area, it added.
http://khon.com/khon/display.cfm?storyID=9137§ionID=1155
Snuffysmith
Up close: the reality of Iraq's hidden war :

Women and children came out carrying white flags. It was eerie seeing columns of people appearing through the smoke and explosions, with no one knowing which direction the shooting was coming from. I am sure we will hear of more casualties.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1648676,00.html
Snuffysmith
Iraq’s economic divide :

Everyone who looks at Iraq sees a nation divided between Shia, Sunni, and Kurd communities. But an equally fundamental division — one that has contributed as much to the ongoing insurrection as sectarian strife and opposition to the American-led military occupation — is the widening gap between Iraq’s rich and poor.
http://tinyurl.com/eyowu
Snuffysmith
Russian parliament condemns US use of phosphorus bombs in Iraq :

The Russian parliament condemned today as 'absolutely unacceptable' the use last year by US forces in Iraq of toxic white phosphorus bombs, which it said was prohibited under international law.
http://www.forbes.com/business/feeds/afx/2...afx2351931.html
Snuffysmith
U.S. morale in Iraq is marked 'fragile':

"Morale is a roller coaster," said Lt. Rusten Currie, who has spent 10 months in Iraq. "We were all idealistic to begin with, wanting to find Osama bin Laden and (Abu Musab al-) Zarqawi, and bring them to justice — whatever that means. Now we just want to go home."
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocount...news/ci_3245026
Snuffysmith
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml.../24/ixhome.html

Another former Blair aide speaks out over going to war in Iraq
By David Rennie in Warsaw
(Filed: 24/11/2005)

A second member of Tony Blair's foreign policy inner circle has broken ranks to call the Prime Minister's Iraq war alliance with President George W Bush a strategic blunder, with "damaging" consequences for Britain.

Sir Stephen Wall, the Prime Minister's former top adviser on Europe and a former ambassador to the European Union, worked at the heart of Downing Street before and during the US-led invasion of Iraq.


Sir Stephen Wall delivered a scathing attack on Tony Blair
Recently retired from Whitehall, Sir Stephen yesterday delivered a powerful critique of Mr Blair's decision to join Mr Bush in a rush for war, and to cut short the diplomatic process under way at the United Nations, splitting Europe in the process.

Mr Blair and Downing Street did not have to choose that path, and did not foresee the degree to which those actions would shatter relationships inside Europe, with "hugely damaging" consequences that linger to this day, Sir Stephen told The Daily Telegraph.

The Bush administration had no appreciation of the damage being done to their ally, Mr Blair.

Nor did the Bush administration greatly care, as their vision was fixed on regime change in Baghdad. "I doubt whether they appreciated the extent to which this was causing a split in Europe, that this was causing a problem for Britain," Sir Stephen said.

His analysis of the lingering harm dealt to Britain's most important international relationships is strikingly similar to criticisms levelled recently in the memoirs of Sir Christopher Meyer, the British Ambassador to Washington throughout the Iraq invasion.

In a speech on the future of the European Union, given at the British Embassy in Luxembourg in honour of Sir Winston Churchill, Sir Stephen Wall was last night due to declare: "The United States has demonstrated the uses - and abuses - of hard power. I believe we in Europe have demonstrated the value of soft power.

"That optimistic view overlooks one hugely damaging event: the division of Europe over the Iraq war. We have not yet recovered from it."

In a draft distributed on the eve of his speech, Sir Stephen continued: "Whatever the rights and wrongs of Britain's decision to accompany the United States to war in Iraq, I believe it should be the determination of every British Prime Minister in future to put reaching an agreement at European level higher on his or her list of priorities than being at one with the United States. We should not agree to act only if there is European agreement. But acting without such agreement should be the last resort, not the first."

The explicit reference to the United States was removed at the last minute. But, reached by telephone on his way to Luxembourg, Sir Stephen confirmed his strong belief that Mr Blair's ongoing disputes with other EU leaders, including over future trade and economic policy, have their roots in Iraq.

He said: "I don't think we understood at the time the degree to which this was going to polarise Europe. We didn't want the split with Germany, didn't intend the split with France."

The crisis was "not inevitable", he said. "Tony Blair took a certain view, and I think would stand by it, about the urgency of the threat represented by Saddam Hussein. But we could have decided we were going to pursue a longer game with Iraq, pursued the second resolution [asking the United Nations to agree to the use of force to enforce controls on banned weapons]. It may be that we would have come to a point further down the road where we realised that Saddam Hussein was stringing us along. But our policy was not one that let us even take that fork in the road."

"Tony Blair did not want to brook delay, and I am arguing there is a price to pay for that, because most of the things we want to do internationally involve the EU," said Sir Stephen, now a lobbyist with the US consultancy firm Hill and Knowlton.

david.rennie@telegraph.co.uk
Snuffysmith
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-1887806,00.html

The Times November 24, 2005

Bush set to pull out 60,000 troops
By Tim Reid
Growing political and public aversion to the war in Iraq is forcing the President’s hand



PRESIDENT BUSH is planning a major pullout of US troops from Iraq amid rising opposition to the war on Capitol Hill and across America.
After a fortnight in which the political debate has rapidly moved from how to fight the war to how best to get out of Iraq, the White House is looking at reducing troop levels by at least 60,000 next year.



Confirming the worst fears of the war’s conservative supporters, who argue that more troops are needed to defeat the insurgency, senior military officials made clear yesterday that the Bush Administration’s goal is to cut troop levels from 160,000 to below 100,000 by the end of 2006.

Condoleezza Rice, the Secretary of State, far from denying the withdrawal plan first reported in The Washington Post, said that a gradual pullout of troops could begin “fairly soon”, and that the number of coalition troops is “clearly going to come down”.

Dr Rice told Fox News that the US will not need to maintain its present troop levels in Iraq for “very much longer”, because Iraqi security forces are “stepping up”. She added: “I think that’s how the President will want to look at this.”

The talk of withdrawal comes after a profound and swift change in attitude about Iraq in Congress. The issue, festering just below the surface for months, has exploded in Washington and is resonating loudly throughout America. In the past fortnight the war has eclipsed every other subject and is accelerating Mr Bush’s slide in the polls.

For the first time senior Republicans are demanding an exit strategy, and with nearly two thirds of Americans now believing that the invasion was a mistake, the political debate is focused on how to end US involvement.

The mood swing began after the US death toll in Iraq passed 2,000 last month, days before the indictment of Lewis Libby, Vice-President Cheney’s former chief-of-staff, for his role in the CIA-leak scandal.

Democrats exploited Mr Libby’s indictment to broaden the debate about how the White House made the case for war, accusing the Administration of manipulating prewar intelligence. Those claims triggered fierce rebuttals from Mr Bush and Mr Cheney. They alleged that Democrats, many of whom voted for the war, saw the same intelligence as the White House. Mr Cheney called the accusations “revisionism of the most corrupt and shameless variety”.

But polls suggest the Democrat claims had some success. For the first time, a majority of Americans believe that Mr Bush is dishonest. Only 29 per cent believe that Mr Cheney is honest. The President’s approval rating is 36 per cent.

With debate about how the White House led the country into war raging, the Republican-controlled Senate backed a resolution last week — by 79 to 19 — that a phased redeployment of US forces from Iraq should begin next year.

The sponsors of that proposal were John Warner, the powerful Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Bill Frist, the Republican Senate leader.

They denied that the move was to distance Republicans from an increasingly unpopular war before next year’s mid-term elections. But John McCain, one of the few Republicans advocating a troop increase, said of his party: “They’re nervous. They see the polls.”

Bill Clinton, the former President, then appeared to disavow his support for the war, declaring it to have been a “big mistake”.

The issue moved centre stage on Friday after John Murtha, a Democrat congressman and a decorated Vietnam veteran who voted for the war, called for a total withdrawal of US troops. That call provoked an ugly and at times hysterical debate in the House of Representatives on Friday night. In a moment of vaudevillian theatrics, one Democrat crossed the floor with his fists raised.

Although Mr Murtha’s proposal for an immediate withdrawal was defeated 403 to 3, Republican attacks on the former Marine’s patriotism backfired. Talk about withdrawal, recently at the fringes of debate, now dominates the agenda. In the past 48 hours several Democrats with their eyes on the 2008 presidential race have talked about a phased pullout.

Fred Barnes, a commentator on the conservative Weekly Standard, said: “These events are ominous . . . they suggest that troop removal has superseded victory as the primary American concern.”

Frank Luntz, a Republican pollster, said: “Americans are demanding a light at the end of the tunnel. Congress is responding to the question: when will it be over?”
Snuffysmith
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cf...jectID=10356665

Report drops Fallujah bombshell

24.11.05
By Peter Popham and Anne Penketh


ROME: The controversy over the American use of white phosphorus as a weapon of war in Fallujah deepened yesterday when it was revealed that a US intelligence assessment had characterised WP as a "chemical weapon".

The Italian journalist who sparked the controversy, Sigfrido Ranucci, told a press conference in Rome that while a colleague was browsing American Defence Department websites he had stumbled on a declassified intelligence report from the first Gulf War.

The file was headed "Possible use of phosphorous chemical weapons by Iraq in Kurdish areas along the Iraqi-Turkish-Iranian borders".

The report was made in late February 1991 during the Iraqi crackdown on the Kurdish uprising that followed the coalition victory against Iraq.

"Iraqi forces loyal to President Saddam may have possibly used white phosphorous (WP) chemical weapons against Kurdish rebels and the populace in Erbil and Dohuk. "The WP chemical was delivered by artillery rounds and helicopter gunships."

The intelligence report added that "reports of possible WP chemical weapon attacks spread quickly among the populace in Erbil and Dohuk.

"As a result, hundreds of thousands of Kurds fled from these two areas across the border into Turkey".

Ranucci commented that "when Saddam used WP it was a chemical weapon but when the Americans use it, it's a conventional weapon. The injuries it inflicts, however, are just as terrible, however you describe it".

In the original RAI documentary, witnesses inside Fallujah during the November 2004 bombardment described the terror and excruciating agony suffered by victims of the shells fired by American artillery.

Two former US soldiers who fought at Fallujah told how they had been ordered to prepare to use the weapons.

The film and still photos posted on the website of the channel that made the film - rainews24.it - show the strange corpses discovered after the city's destruction.

Many of the skin on the bodies had apparently melted or caramelised so their features were indistinguishable.

Ranucci said he had seen "more than 100" of what he described as "anomalous corpses" in the city.

The US State Department and the Pentagon have shifted their position repeatedly in the aftermath of the film's showing.

After initially denying that US forces use WP as a weapon, the Pentagon said WP had been used against insurgents in Fallujah.

Military analysts said there remained questions about the official US position on its observance of the 1980 conventional weapons treaty which governs the use of WP as an incendiary weapon and sets prohibitions, such as its use on civilians.

Daryl Kimball, the director of the Arms Control Association in Washington, yesterday called for an independent investigation to scrutinise the US use of WP in Fallujah.

"If it was used as an incendiary weapon, clear restrictions apply," he said. "Given that the US and UK went into Iraq on the ground that Saddam Hussein had used chemical weapons against his own people, we need to make sure that we are not violating the laws that we have subscribed to." Although WP is classified as a conventional not a chemical weapon, its effects are chemical as well as merely thermal. The choking white smoke it produces is highly toxic, and causes severe burns internally and externally to anyone caught in its path.

Yesterday a further wrinkle was added to the row when Adam Mynott, a BBC correspondent posted to Nassiriya during the invasion of Iraq in April 2003, told Rai News 24 that he had seen WP apparently used as a weapon against insurgents in that city.
Snuffysmith
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051124/ap_on_...GZhBHNlYwM3MjE-

Suicide Bombing Leaves 30 Dead in Iraq By BASSEM MROUE, Associated Press Writer

A suicide car bomber targeting U.S. troops handing out toys to children at a hospital in central Iraq killed 30 people Thursday, including four police guards, three women and two children, officials said.

Another 35 people were wounded in the morning attack in Mahmoudiya, about 20 miles south of Baghdad, said Dr. Dawoud al-Taie, the director of the local hospital.

Elsewhere, three American soldiers from Task Force Baghdad died of gunshot wounds Wednesday in Baghdad, and a fourth died of wounds sustained Wednesday from a roadside bomb in Hit, 85 miles west of Baghdad, another statement said.

Most of the more than 140,000 U.S. troops in Iraq got a traditional Thanksgiving meal of turkey and all the trimmings at their bases Thursday. In Baghdad, they were visited by U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, who called their service "a huge sacrifice, but a sacrifice for a good cause."

A car bomb also exploded Thursday evening near a crowded soft drink stand in the Shiite city of Hillah, 60 miles south of Baghdad, killing at least two people, police Capt. Muthanna Khalid said.

Hillah has frequently been targeted by suicide bombers, but it was unclear if the latest blast was such an attack. On Feb. 28, a suicide car bomber killed 125 people in Hillah — the deadliest single strike since the fall of Saddam Hussein.

The suicide bomber in Mahmoudiya was targeting U.S. military vehicles parked near the hospital, said Iraqi army Capt. Ibrahim Abdeallah. He said two U.S. soldiers were wounded and one Humvee damaged.

The U.S. soldiers were distributing toys to children in the hospital, said police Maj. Falah al-Mohammedawi.

Dr. Osama Kassab of Baghdad's Yarmouk hospital said 23 were injured and three killed at his facility. It was not clear if these were in addition to the dead and wounded cited by the doctor in Mahmoudiya.

"It was an explosion at the gate of the hospital," said one woman who had wounds on her face and legs. "My children are gone. My brother is gone."

Mahmoudiya is a religiously mixed town in the so-called "Triangle of Death," a region known for attacks on coalition forces and Shiites moving through the area to visit shrines south of the region.

In the southern Dora neighborhood of Baghdad, gunmen ambushed a police patrol, killing four officers, police Capt. Qassim Hussein said.

In a separate attack, a bodyguard for the head of the Iraqi Islamic Party branch in Khalis, 50 miles north of Baghdad, was wounded in a drive-by shooting Thursday. Hussein Abid al-Zubeidi, who is also a member of the Diyala provincial council, said he escaped unharmed from the attack near Baqouba, 35 miles northeast of Baghdad.

In a similar shooting, former Iraqi army Col. Hussein Mohammed was killed late Wednesday in Baqouba, said Dr. Ahmed Fouad, a morgue attendant.

Insurgents have repeatedly struck in the Khalis-Baqouba area, mostly focusing on Iraqis who join the security forces or participate in politics.

A roadside bomb Thursday slightly injured three Polish soldiers and one Iraqi child near Camp Echo, the headquarters for Poland's military mission in Diwaniyah, 80 miles south of Baghdad, said Col. Zdzislaw Gnatowski, a military spokesman in Warsaw.

Government spokesman Laith Kubba told reporters that insurgent attacks are expected to rise before the Dec. 15 parliamentary election. He said "Muslim extremists and Saddam's criminals" will be making their last stand.

Some insurgent groups have declared a boycott of the election and have threatened politicians who participate.

The presidential security adviser said several insurgent groups have contacted President Jalal Talabani's office in the past few days to respond to his call for them to lay down their arms and join the political process.

"Many groups have called and some of them clearly expressed the readiness to join the political process," Lt. Gen. Wafiq al-Samaraei told The Associated Press on Thursday. This shows that "the initiative was welcomed by Iraqis."

Al-Samaraei, a former military intelligence chief under Saddam, did not say whether the groups were Muslim extremists or belonged to the Saddam's Baath Party.

But some residents of Anbar province said four insurgent groups that are active in that area were conferring among themselves to chose a representative to meet government officials.

The United States hopes that a big Sunni turnout next month will produce a broad-based government that can win the minority's trust, helping to take the steam out of the insurgency and hasten the day when American and other foreign troops can go home.

Many Sunnis, who comprise about 20 percent of Iraq's 27 million people but were dominant under Saddam, boycotted the January election, enabling rival Shiites and Kurds to dominate the transitional government, which heightened tensions.

In Qaim, U.S. Marines of the 1st Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion spoke Thursday about missing family and friends back home as they prepared to spend their Thanksgiving on patrol near the Syrian border.

"Serving my country is important but losing friends makes me more thankful for what I have and for what I used to take for granted," said Cpl. Brian Zwart, 20, of Fruitport, Mich., who operates a 25mm cannon atop an armored personnel carrier.

Others thought about what they might be doing if they were back home.

"I could be sitting on the couch at home watching football with my dad. Instead I'm driving in Iraq," said Lance Cpl. Kyle Maxwell, 21, of Petaluma, Calif. Maxwell is spending his first Thanksgiving away from home driving an armored personnel carrier on patrol.

Soldiers in Baghdad also ran in a 5-kilometer "Turkey Trot" race, then enjoyed a large big spread including turkey, ham, mashed potatoes, stuffing, sweet potatoes, shrimp cocktail and about five kinds of pie for dessert.

North of Baghdad, country music star Aaron Tippin was scheduled to give a concert to soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division at Forward Operating Base Speicher.



Copyright © 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.


Copyright © 2005 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Questions or Comments
Privacy Policy -Terms of Service - Copyright/IP Policy - Ad Feedback
Snuffysmith
http://www.voanews.com/english/2005-11-23-voa66.cfm



Iraqi PM Criticizes Call for US, British Troop Withdrawal
By Alisha Ryu
Baghdad
23 November 2005

Iraq's Shi'ite prime minister lashed out Wednesday against Sunni Arab assertions that the country's Sunni-led insurgency is legitimate because it is only aimed at ridding the country of foreign occupiers.


Ibrahim al-Jaafari
During a government-sponsored seminar on anti-terrorism Wednesday, Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari bluntly told lawmakers that many people in Iraq were "tired" of the slogans that call for the departure of the British and the Americans.

Mr. Jaafari said that the nearly 180,000 foreign troops in Iraq were operating under a United Nations mandate and urged all Iraqis to be tolerant of their presence until that mandate ends at the end of 2006.

The prime minister's remarks were clearly meant to show his displeasure over a declaration, made at a recent reconciliation conference in Cairo, that called for a specific timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. and other coalition troops from Iraq. The declaration also said that opponents of the coalition troop presence here had a legitimate right to resist.

The communiqué drafted by Iraqi Shi'ite, Kurdish and Sunni politicians who attended the conference was hailed as a step forward in reaching out to the disaffected Sunni Muslim minority.

So far, Sunnis have largely boycotted the political process, partly because they say that Iraq could not be considered sovereign while foreign troops patrolled Iraqi streets. Disgruntled Sunni Arabs, angry over losing privileges and jobs after the fall of Saddam Hussein, are believed to be financing and supporting much of violence in the country's two-and-a-half year-old insurgency.

But some Shi'ite officials, including Mr. Jaafari and Iraq's controversial interior minister, Bayan Jabr, says the Cairo declaration failed to address the problem of Sunni insurgents and extremists targeting Shi'ite civilians and the government's largely Shi'ite security forces.

There are no exact figures on how many Shi'ite civilians and security personnel have been killed in Iraq in insurgent violence, but estimates run into the thousands.

Last week, Sunni leaders widely criticized Interior Minister Jabr after U.S. troops inadvertently discovered nearly 170 starving and abused Sunni Arab detainees in an interior ministry-run facility in Baghdad.

Sunni Arabs said that the incident proved that Shi'ite officials inside the ministry are working with an Iranian-backed militia called the Badr Brigade to round up, torture, and kill Sunnis in revenge for attacks by Sunni insurgents. Interior Minister Jabr says his detention facility only held hardcore terrorists, who had warrants out for their arrest.

Since the discovery of the detainees, there has been growing friction between the U.S. military and Mr. Jabr, on the one side, and the head of the Badr organization, Hadi al-Ameri. Mr. Jabr and Mr. Ameri have both denied charges that the interior ministry has close ties with the Badr group.

Speaking to the Iraqi media on Wednesday, Mr. Ameri, who is also a Shi'ite lawmaker in the National Assembly, did not mention his group's tense relations with the U.S. military. Instead, he called on Iraqis to accept the presence of foreign troops, including more than 140,000 U.S. troops.

Mr. Ameri says the presence of multi-national forces is necessary to keep stability while the country builds up its security forces. He says, in this context, whoever targets coalition troops for violence should be automatically considered terrorists, not legitimate fighters.
Snuffysmith
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10107233/

More deadly blasts shatter Iraqi cities
Death toll for week passes 200 as dozens die in Mahmoudiya, Hillah

Khalid Mohammed / AP

Updated: 4:26 p.m. ET Nov. 24, 2005
BAGHDAD, Iraq - A suicide bomber blew up his car outside a hospital south of Baghdad on Thursday while U.S. troops handed out candy and food to children, killing 30 people and wounding about 40, including four Americans.

As U.S. troops spent another Thanksgiving at war, two soldiers died in another bombing near the capital, and the U.S. command said four American deaths occurred Wednesday.

Elsewhere, 11 Iraqis were killed and 17 injured Thursday when a car bomb exploded near a crowded soft drink stand in Hillah, a mostly Shiite Muslim city 60 miles south of Baghdad. More than 200 people — mostly Shiites — have died from suicide attacks and car bombs since Friday.

Amid the bloodshed, at least four insurgent groups reportedly were mulling a government offer to talk peace — a hopeful sign for efforts to end an insurgency that has claimed thousands of lives.

Three women and two children were among the dead in the attack outside the hospital in Mahmoudiya, a flashpoint town 20 miles south of Baghdad in the “triangle of death” notorious for attacks on Shiite Muslims, U.S. troops and foreign travelers.

A civil affairs team from the U.S. Army’s Task Force Baghdad was at the hospital studying ways to upgrade the facility when the bomber struck just outside the guarded compound, a U.S. military statement said.

Some American soldiers were distributing toys and food to children when the attack occurred about 10:40 a.m., Iraqi police Maj. Falah al-Mohammedawi said.

“There was an explosion at the gate of the hospital,” sobbed one woman with wounds on her face and legs. “My children are gone. My brother is gone.”

The two U.S. soldiers killed Thursday died when their patrol was hit by a roadside bomb southwest of the capital, a U.S. statement said.

Four more American soldiers were killed Wednesday — three in the Baghdad area and one in Hit, 85 miles west of the capital in the Euphrates River valley, the command said.

At least 2,104 U.S. military personnel have died since the war began in 2003, according to an Associated Press count. The AP count is four lower than the Defense Department’s tally, which was last updated at 10 a.m. EST Wednesday.

In Baghdad, U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad marked the military’s third Thanksgiving in Iraq by praising the “huge sacrifice” of American troops. Most of the 140,000 troops got a traditional meal of turkey and the trimmings at dining halls — or on the hoods of Humvees before going on patrol.

U.S. and Iraqi officials had been expecting a rise in violence before the Dec. 15 election, when voters will select their first fully constitutional parliament since the ouster of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

On Thursday, government spokesman Laith Kubba called the pre-election attacks “the last stand” of “Muslim extremists and Saddam’s criminals,” predicting they would rapidly lose support after establishment of a new government and a national reconciliation conference expected early next year.

More voters of the Sunni Arab minority, the backbone of the insurgency, are expected to vote this time, unlike the January balloting that many of them boycotted. Some Sunni insurgent groups have condemned the election and are expected to l