Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Blackwell intends to Run Out the Clock
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Civil Rights and Civil Liberties > Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Archive
JasonATexan
http://www.townhall.com/news/politics/2004...20041116a.shtml

Although Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell has yet to certify the results of the state's presidential voting, Republican President George W. Bush won 2,796,147 votes on Nov. 2 to Kerry's 2,659,664, a difference of 136,483. Ohio's 20 electoral votes helped Bush accumulate 286 in all, 16 more than he needed for re-election.
Gabrielle
Is there anything we can do to help?
JackD
I don't know much about recount processes. So, is this news good or bad?
MrJim
I don't understand how the post title relates to the post body. Fill me in?
tnwycked
I would just like to find some answers to a few questions about the election results and re-count

1. Did we get a audit in florida? And if so what was the results and if not, when or are we going to get one?

2. What is happening in Ohio today?

3. If blackwell is running the clock, he still legally has to have the vote results certified by Dec. 7, and the electorials dont vote until Dec. 13, so is the short time before electorials vote the problem and if so why?

5. I would love to see one single news source not based on the net that tells me ohio is going to get a re-count.

6. And if we get a re-count in ohio, what is legally suppose to happen if a possible mistake or fraud is found?

Please help a voter who doesnt quite understand what happens when her countrys cheating her country. blink.gif
JackD
QUOTE(tnwycked @ Nov 16 2004, 04:38 PM)
I would just like to find some answers to a few questions about the election results and re-count

1.  Did we get a audit in florida?  And if so what was the results and if not,  when or are we going to get one?

2.  What is happening in Ohio today?

3.  If blackwell is running the clock,  he still legally has to have the vote results certified by Dec. 7, and the electorials dont vote until Dec. 13,  so is the short time before electorials vote the problem and if so why?

5. I would love to see one single news source not based on the net that tells me ohio is going to get a re-count.

6. And if we get a re-count in ohio,  what is legally suppose to happen if a possible mistake or fraud is found?

Please help a voter who doesnt quite understand what happens when her countrys cheating her country. blink.gif
*



Good questions. Too bad all of the experts are too busy answer us! I just hate wating like this.
Buster0001
This article came from salon.com and it talks about Blackwell
not allowing votes to be counted. There has to be a way
for us to force him:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/11/16/palast/
Greg Palast:

QUOTE
Sean Hannity called me a putz. Oh, my! And soft-porn-site scribe Frank Salvato put me in with the "black helicopter" conspiracy league. Golly!

I can live with that. But when Salon disses my report of vote suppression in Ohio ("Was the Election Stolen?" by Farhad Manjoo), I have to respond. Manjoo went after my article, "Kerry Won," the latest in my series of investigations of our manipulated election system first published in America by ... Salon: "Florida's Flawed 'Voter-Cleansing' Program."

Now, the facts. Most voters in Ohio cast their ballots for John Kerry, which should, in accordance with Mrs. Gordon's civics lessons from sixth grade, have given Kerry the Electoral College majority and the White House. Trouble is, those votes won't be counted.

So where are these uncounted, but winning, votes? When I went to sleep the night of Nov. 2, Kerry was down in Ohio by 136,000 votes. But over a quarter million ballots had yet to be counted. Those abandoned ballots, overwhelmingly Democratic, sit in two piles, one called "spoiled" and the other "provisional."

The ugly, secret shame of American democracy is that 2 million votes are "spoiled" in presidential elections -- tossed away untallied as "unreadable." And the nasty part is that roughly half are cast by African-Americans. To learn of this astonishing Jim Crow thumb on the U.S. electoral scales, you have to hunt through the appendixes of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission report on the Florida 2000 race. The government's demographers concluded that of the 179,855 votes "spoiled" in Florida that year, 54 percent were cast by blacks. All other credible studies tell us that Florida is horribly typical of the nation.

Last Tuesday, in Ohio, Republicans played the spoilage game for all it was worth. Over 93,000 ballots were chucked on the spoilage pile, almost all of them generated by those infernal chad-making punch-card machines.

Whose votes were lost in the chad blizzard? According to a recent ACLU analysis of Ohio's system, votes stolen away by punch-card machine error are "overwhelmingly" found in African-American -- read "Democratic" -- precincts.

After the swindle of 2000, who would have the nerve to keep these machines in operation? Answer: the co-chair of Ohio's Bush-Cheney reelection campaign, J. Kenneth Blackwell, who also happens to have the convenient post of Ohio secretary of state. Blackwell, who makes Katherine Harris look like Thomas Jefferson, concedes the racially bent effects of punch-card voting; but in spite of this -- or because of this -- he refused to replace or fix these machines for the 2004 election.

The result: 93,000 votes spoiled, uncounted. Salon's Manjoo, ignorant of the ACLU's precinct-by-precinct studies, simply dismisses out of hand the assertion that most of those were Kerry votes. But given that Ohio's spoiled ballots are concentrated in black and poor communities, it is hardly a wild leap to discern which candidate got punched out by the punch cards.

Now, on to the second pile of no-count ballots, the provisionals. And guess who got these second-class, back-of-the-bus ballots? Once again, Ohio's African-American voters.

The Republican Party declared the hunting season open for dark-skinned voters in October, announcing a plan to challenge "fraudulent" voters on a mass basis, the first such programmatic attack on the franchise since the days of the Night Riders.

And the tactic was very much the same as that used by the allies of the White Citizens Councils and Bull Conners in the early '60s: targeted and unequal application of picayune registration and voting requirements. The Ohio courts were not amused, slapping down the Republican Party's challenge lists before Election Day.

However, the party kept secret lists and a secret program in its back pocket to ambush black voters on Election Day, a scheme outed by BBC television the week before the election.

Majoo has an answer for that, too. On Oct. 27, Manjoo wrote an entire column defending the po' widdle Republicans from BBC's mean and unfounded attack, subtitled, "Investigative reporter Greg Palast discovers a 'secret' voting list, but the document doesn't necessarily prove Republican wrongdoing." Ace reporter Manjoo's entire investigation of the matter comes down to three quotations from a Republican Party flack, Mindy Tucker Fletcher, who -- surprise! -- denied the BBC's findings. I was never contacted nor was a single one of our experts.

Here's what we discovered at the BBC: several lists of voters, every one of them in an African-American precinct. Fletcher's official explanation (her third variant, by the way) was that these were returned undeliverable fundraising solicitations. Odd, that: Many of the addresses were those of homeless men's shelters, not where I'd expect a lot of Bush-Cheney donors. And why were the Republicans sending solicitations only to black voters? Is that their normal funding group?

More suspicious is that these lists of "undeliverable addresses" were sent, not to some clerk at a direct-mail house, but to the chief of research for the Republican National Committee in Washington as well as the executive director of the Bush-Cheney campaign in Florida. I guess they handle the clerical overflow work.

Or maybe, as every expert told us, these were hit lists meant to stop, impede, intimidate and slow down voters in African-American precincts. The Republicans have more than embarrassment to motivate them to mislead us about the true purpose of these lists: Profiling citizens of one race to block their voting, even if each challenge itself has merit, is a criminal violation of the Voting Rights Act.

Whatever their ultimate use of these lists, whatever the Republican game plan, we have the result: In Ohio, an astonishing 155,000 voters were shunted to provisional ballots, where their votes would be vulnerable to the partisan predation of GOP Secretary of State Blackwell. And once again, the provisionals were concentrated in the minority -- that is, Democratic -- areas.

Blackwell wasted no time in jiggering the rules to make sure as few provisional ballots as possible would be counted. He began by announcing that, for the first time in Ohio history, provisional ballots would not be counted if cast by a legal voter in the "wrong" precinct, even though the president remains the same for voters of all precincts. Furthermore, to increase the number of provisional ballots subject to challenge, Blackwell and other Republican office holders in Ohio went on a voter-roll-purging frenzy prior to the election. A favorite, first practiced in Florida in 2000, is to tag them ineligible "felon" voters. If a voter is wrongly purged, the registration is restored, yet the ballot will still be binned.

Add it up and the demographics of the spoiled and provisional ballots -- if they were all counted -- would overtake George Bush's teeny lead.

Lacking evidence to refute the hard stats and demographics that the uncounted votes are mostly Kerry's, Manjoo ducks behind this tautological rock: He can "prove that Kerry couldn't have won in Ohio: He conceded."

Kerry did not concede because he did not have the votes. He conceded because he could not get them counted. Kerry would have to demand a hand count of the spoiled punch cards. But the hard fact is that, just as Katherine Harris stopped the hand count of the punch cards in Florida, Blackwell would undoubtedly do the same in Ohio. And face it: In a legal showdown, Blackwell could count on the help of that pus-hole of partisanship, the U.S. Supreme Court. Been there, done that. Add in the ballot-by-ballot litigation required to force a count of all the provisional ballots under rules à la Blackwell, and Kerry, realistically, didn't stand a chance.

Unfortunately, neither did democracy.
JasonATexan
Without certified votes we can not have a recount. Basically it means they are going to run the clock out to stop the recount!
JackD
QUOTE(JasonATexan @ Nov 16 2004, 04:56 PM)
Without certified votes we can not have a recount. Basically it means they are going to run the clock out to stop the recount!
*



Hmmm....so what do we do?
brossignol
QUOTE(JasonATexan @ Nov 16 2004, 04:07 PM)


This is almost worthy of Activisms. Good job!

Where in that entire article did you get your post title from?
JasonATexan
QUOTE(brossignol @ Nov 16 2004, 05:19 PM)
This is almost worthy of Activisms.  Good job!

Where in that entire article did you get your post title from?
*


Blackwell has yet to certify the results of the state's presidential voting
brossignol
QUOTE(JasonATexan @ Nov 16 2004, 05:21 PM)
Blackwell has yet to certify the results of the state's presidential voting
*


Ah, I see. Then I take it back. Your title at least had some basis in reality. smile.gif

However, did they finish counting the provisionals and absentees yet? The results cannot be certified until they have the results.

I wouldn't expect that to take until December. Is there a law in Ohio that say the SOS cannot certify the results until a particular date or only that he must certify it before a certain date?
gmanders777
The official tallies are due at the Secretary of State's Office by December 1. The Secretary of State must certify the election under Ohio law by December 3.
brossignol
QUOTE(gmanders777 @ Nov 16 2004, 05:34 PM)
The official tallies are due at the Secretary of State's Office by December 1. The Secretary of State must certify the election under Ohio law by December 3.
*


Right. But is there anything that says they cannot be certified before a certain date?

The last I had heard is that provisionals are still being counted. Not sure about absentees.

Has there been any ETA for the completion of THAT count?

I mean, if they are all counted by, say, 11/20, why couldn't they be certified that day or the next?
BrokeInOhio
QUOTE(brossignol @ Nov 16 2004, 07:39 PM)
Right.  But is there anything that says they cannot be certified before a certain date?

The last I had heard is that provisionals are still being counted.  Not sure about absentees.

Has there been any ETA for the completion of THAT count?

I mean, if they are all counted by, say, 11/20, why couldn't they be certified that day or the next?
*

The provisional ballots count results are not expected to be available until the 22nd.
searchingforsanity
Did you see this article?

Ohio Has Clearer Picture of Ballots Now

By MARK WILLIAMS, Associated Press Writer

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...63&sid=96378798

COLUMBUS, Ohio - Most of the presidential election provisional ballots rejected so far in Ohio came from people who were not even registered to vote, election officials said after spending nearly two weeks poring over thousands of disputed votes.

The vast majority of provisional ballots have been legitimate, however. Of the 11 counties that have completed checking ballots, 81 percent of the ballots are valid, according to a survey Monday by The Associated Press.

Unofficial vote totals show President Bush (news - web sites) beating Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites) by 136,000 votes in Ohio, and Kerry has conceded there are not enough outstanding votes to swing the state his way.

It is too early to know whether the provisional ballots have benefited Bush or Kerry because counties first need to determine their validity before conducting the count.

Some people said they were holding out hope for a miracle until all votes were counted. Lawyers with Kerry's campaign were in Ohio to check into voters' concerns about ballots, but said they were not trying to challenge the election.

The counties have until Dec. 1 to complete their final count.

The focus is on the 155,337 provisional ballots cast by Ohio voters. Provisional ballots are cast by voters whose names are not on the rolls for some reason or whose eligibility is otherwise in doubt, and are counted after the election is over if they are deemed valid.

Reasons provisional ballots were rejected in Ohio included missing information such as addresses or signatures and people voting in precincts where they do not live. Other people simply were not registered.

"Some people thought because they had changed their mailing address at the post office, or had changed their utilities, that they had done everything necessary to be eligible to vote," said Nancy Moore, deputy director of the Belmont County Board of Elections. "They still have to change their address at the board of elections. We're not mindreaders."

In another twist to the tally, a statewide recount of the presidential vote appears inevitable after a pair of third-party candidates said they have collected enough money to pay for it.

The recount would be conducted after the election results are certified.

The candidates said they are not trying to overturn Bush's victory in Ohio, but just want to ensure that all votes were counted properly in the face of concerns about Election Day irregularities.

"Our bottom line is to stand up for the integrity of the voting process because the voting process is the heart of the democratic process," said Blair Bobier, spokesman for Green Party candidate David Cobb.

In New Hampshire, third-party presidential candidate Ralph Nader (news - web sites) has asked for a recount covering 11 of the state's 126 precincts that use Diebold Inc.'s Accuvote optical scanning machines to count paper ballots. Depending on the results, his campaign could ask for recounts in other states, spokesman Kevin Zeese said Monday.
brossignol
QUOTE(BrokeInOhio @ Nov 16 2004, 06:24 PM)
The provisional ballots count results are not expected to be available until the 22nd.
*


OK, then why not certify on the 23rd, or, heck, even the 24th??

Of course, then there is the holiday weekend, so I am sure nothing will get done until the 29th. But that is a far cry from the 3rd or 6th or whatever of December.

But, I am not sure that it honestly matters. The Electoral College meets on Dec 16, right? Those ballots are not certified by the House until like January 6th. Recounts or whatever can still be ongoing.

But, keep in mind, at all times, it only takes one member of the House and one member of the Senate to stand up and say they do not agree with the results of the Electoral College and then it is up to them to decide.
jeffmoskin
And when they do decide to let the House vote on it, the rules say one vote per state. Bush by a landslide. Again.
JRSocal
QUOTE(JasonATexan @ Nov 16 2004, 02:07 PM)
http://www.townhall.com/news/politics/2004...20041116a.shtml

Although Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell has yet to certify the results of the state's presidential voting, Republican President George W. Bush won 2,796,147 votes on Nov. 2 to Kerry's 2,659,664, a difference of 136,483. Ohio's 20 electoral votes helped Bush accumulate 286 in all, 16 more than he needed for re-election.
*



He changed the recount rules AFTER the election, and now he has changed the cost of the recount.

This spells G U I L T Y . He needs to be known as Katherine Blackwell.

They fixed another election on us.
brossignol
QUOTE(JRSocal @ Nov 16 2004, 10:23 PM)
He changed the recount rules AFTER the election, and now he has changed the cost of the recount.

This spells G U I L T Y .  He needs to be known as Katherine Blackwell.

They fixed another election on us.
*


Ya know, I keep hearing this. Does anyone have a link to a REAL media source that states this. The reason is that I looked around and the only real media I saw that said anything about it were the Ohio newspapers and they all indicated that there was some confusion regarding what was acceptable and what was not and did not mention the birth date thing at all.
BrokeInOhio
http://serform2.sos.state.oh.us/sos/index....os.state.oh.us/

Blackwell's site, there is a link somewhere in the layers to read his directives. I would sift through it to find it again, but going to bed. I have read so much over the past few days, I can't remember if I read the provisional ballot item on here or on the news......maybe it was the moritz law site......seems like the date of the directive was 11/9 or 11/11. Sorry I couldn't be more help.

Edit: Click in the upper right for this statement regarding the court decision:

http://serform2.sos.state.oh.us/sos/news/index4.htm
brossignol
QUOTE(BrokeInOhio @ Nov 16 2004, 10:35 PM)
http://serform2.sos.state.oh.us/sos/index....os.state.oh.us/

Blackwell's site, there is a link somewhere in the layers to read his directives.  I would sift through it to find it again, but going to bed.  I have read so much over the past few days, I can't remember if I read the provisional ballot item on here or on the news......maybe it was the moritz law site......seems like the date of the directive was 11/9 or 11/11.  Sorry I couldn't be more help.

Edit:  Click in the upper right for this statement regarding the court decision: 

http://serform2.sos.state.oh.us/sos/news/index4.htm
*


Well, the court decision is in regards to the issue of provisionals not counting if the voter is in the wrong precinct.

I was still unable to find any solid information regarding the alleged directive regarding the date of birth, but I did dig this up from Daily Kos:

"Here is the exchange I just had by email with one of the Columbus Dispatch editors, regarding this story. His most recent reply is at the top; my original message is at the bottom. Take it as you will:

At 08:42 PM 11/11/2004 -0500, you wrote:

Dear Mr. Miller,
thank you for your reply! If that's the case, then why would the elections officials be reporting that Blackwell had issued it? Can you tell me a little more?
Thanks very much.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Miller
Sent: Nov 11, 2004 7:37 PM

Subject: Re: BREAKING re: Blackwell changes rules on ballot counting

We checked this out today. Blackwell did not issue such a directive.

Alan

At 06:54 AM 11/11/2004 -0500, you wrote:

Dear Mr. Miller,
the local press in Cuyahoga County, Ohio is breaking a story about how Kenneth Blackwell,
the Ohio Secretary of State, has changed the rules suddenly concerning the counting
of provisional ballots in Ohio. His change was directed only at Cuyahoga County,
which is a heavily democratic area. Blackwell has angered the elections officials
there by sending down an order at 2:30 pm yesterday saying that all ballots which
don't have the date of birth on the front must be disqualified. However, this goes
against the original rules for the counting of provisional ballots, which said that
the absence of that information should not disqualify any ballot.

Please check out the story at this link and please investigate this! Kenneth Blackwell
was chair of the Bush reelection campaign in Ohio and is a partisan out to make
sure that such irregularities occur so as to impede the inclusion of democratic
votes:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/11/03225/949#44

PLEASE INVESTIGATE AND DO A STORY!!

Thank you."
Activisms
We can all sign a petition to get him ousted, forced out of there, and nowhere near the area during recounts.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.