Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Bush critics can expect character assassination
Common Ground Common Sense > Online Café > Just talking politics Archive
rox63
From the Asheville Citizen-Times:

http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll...60127034%2F1006

QUOTE
Anyone who now suggests Emperor Bush has no clothes can expect character assassination

by Thomas Sullivan
published January 28, 2006 6:00 am

When Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) dared question President Bush’s leadership by calling for immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq, the hawkish Vietnam veteran seemed an unlikely target for another swift boat-style attack.

But smear the messenger is a reflex among fringe activists unable to stomach questioning of their leaders, much less debate “responsibly” (the president’s word) how best to destroy al-Qaida or accomplish the mission in Iraq.

On Jan. 13, Cybercast News Service retaliated by insinuating that Murtha’s combat decorations are undeserved. The “swift boating” of Murtha had begun. We’ve gone from questioning fitness to lead to questioning fitness to question.

Reagan administration Secretary of the Navy James Webb responded in the New York Times, “To no one’s surprise, surrogates carry out the attacks, leaving President Bush and other Republican leaders to benefit from the results while publicly distancing themselves from the actual remarks.”

David Thibault, former producer of the Republican National Committee’s televised news magazine, runs Cybercast. Former Rush Limbaugh writer/producer Marc Morano wrote the article. Thibault told the Washington Post Murtha’s record is relevant now “because the congressman has really put himself in the forefront of the anti-war movement.”

“In other words,” the Post’s E. J. Dionne wrote, “if Murtha had just shut up and gone along with Bush, nothing would have been said about his service.” The message to combat veterans: get in the way of Bush and you’re road kill.

So Vietnam veteran Webb is one Virginia Democrat who had best watch his back.

In his Jan. 18 op-ed piece, he cautioned that such attacks invert the tradition of honoring combat veterans and will backfire in Republican faces. “A young American now serving in Iraq,” Webb wrote, “might rightly wonder whether his or her service will be deliberately misconstrued 20 years from now.” Webb believes that may be why most Iraq war veterans to declare for public office have chosen to run as Democrats.

Swift boating is one of the crudest forms of political activism and any past bipartisan misbehavior does not excuse it. Even Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly cries foul, if for no other reason than conservative operatives have begun eating their own.

On Jan. 17, Patriots to Restore Checks and Balances (PRCB) called for an investigation into the president’s authorization of the National Security Agency to violate domestic surveillance restrictions in the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act. PRCB members include former U.S. Rep. Bob Barr; Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform; Paul Weyrich, chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation; Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation; and David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union.

The liberal blogger, Digby, observes, “‘Conservative’ is a magic word that applies to those who are in other conservatives’ good graces. Until they aren’t. At which point they are liberals.” Even “patriots” has lost its mojo. PRCB members are excoriated online as terrorist enablers, traitors and not real conservatives.

By now the list of treasonous subversives includes Brent Scowcroft, former national security advisor under Presidents Ford and George H.W. Bush; former National Security Council member Rand Beers; former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke; former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill; former State Department Chief of Staff Col. Larry Wilkerson; National Review magazine’s founder William F. Buckley and editor Rich Lowry; the Washington Times’ Bruce Bartlett; Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), Sam Brownback (R-Kan.); and former Sen. Max Cleland, among others. All have questioned Bush’s leadership. Several drew campaigns of character assassination.

Real conservatives briefly considered that unethical. At a recent conference, “The Conservative Movement: Its Past, Present, and Future,” author Rick Perlstein spoke of being inspired by Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) who in 1960 supported Sen. Barry Goldwater for president over Richard Nixon, whom they considered unprincipled.

In 1965, YAF chairman Tom Charles Huston condemned conservatives “who abuse the truth, who resort to violence and engage in slander,” and “who seek victory at any price without regard for the broken lives … incurred by those who stand in the way.”

Yet, YAF moralists were soon working for President Nixon, inccluding Huston as architect of the political espionage campaign that became Watergate.

That anything-for-the-cause coldness persists. It would be nice to believe these attacks are aberrations, actions of a reactionary fringe that ethical Republican politicians will repudiate.

Don’t expect that until the public no longer lets them get away with it.

--------
Thomas M. Sullivan is a professional engineer who consults for industries ranging from chemicals to biotech. He lives in Asheville. His columns appear on alternate Saturdays
MrJim
So why do we even put up with this crap? Why aren't lawsuits being filed? If these people try to pull us into the gutter, why don't we drag them down with us?
Indianhead
Just like Joe McCarthy...eventually they will
take on someone who isn't afraid...isn't soft...
then there's a fight...then the public is engaged.
Salute_Liberty
Geez, what can be worse than betraying America's Constitution and Democracy (remember that a handful of Repub Senators knew that Bush was spying on American citizens and never told their peers), and accepting Abramoff's bribes to indicate how flawed and corrupted Repub NeoCons are when it comes to kowtowing to the highest bidders? That's almost like playing treason to America and the American Public!
graham4anything
If only there was outrage when this fraud happened early in the morning election night 2000

remember this---after the networks took back Al Gore's victory in Florida, in the dead of the night...and you wonder why some people think the conspiracy was in stealing the election in the first place-this event enabled everything else to happen

"A full cousin of George W. Bush, John Prescott Ellis, was analyzing data from the Voter News Service for Fox News and had several times contact by telephone with both George and Jeb Bush that night. It was his decision to call Florida for Bush, with Fox being the first network to do so. However, Fox had also incorrectly called the state for Gore before the polls had closed, like the other networks, and retracted around the same time they did which was at around 10pm that evening. Fox only called the state for Bush at 2:16am, shortly after the famous Volusia error was introduced. This error took 16,022 votes away from Gore and added those votes and more to Bush, producing more total votes in the precinct than there were registered voters. The other major networks announced the same totals within minutes. The error was corrected quickly and the calls retracted one by one. "
dennisjames
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Jan 28 2006, 06:33 PM)
If only there was outrage when this fraud happened early in the morning election night 2000

remember this---after the networks took back Al Gore's victory in Florida, in the dead of the night...and you wonder why some people think the conspiracy was in stealing the election in the first place-this event enabled everything else to happen

"A full cousin of George W. Bush, John Prescott Ellis, was analyzing data from the Voter News Service for Fox News and had several times contact by telephone with both George and Jeb Bush that night. It was his decision to call Florida for Bush, with Fox being the first network to do so. However, Fox had also incorrectly called the state for Gore before the polls had closed, like the other networks, and retracted around the same time they did which was at around 10pm that evening. Fox only called the state for Bush at 2:16am, shortly after the famous Volusia error was introduced. This error took 16,022 votes away from Gore and added those votes and more to Bush, producing more total votes in the precinct than there were registered voters. The other major networks announced the same totals within minutes. The error was corrected quickly and the calls retracted one by one. "
*

Kinda looks like it did in Ohio in 2004, doesn't it?
Pegatha
“A young American now serving in Iraq,” Webb wrote, “might rightly wonder whether his or her service will be deliberately misconstrued 20 years from now.” Webb believes that may be why most Iraq war veterans to declare for public office have chosen to run as Democrats.

Excellent point that bears repeating.
70sliberalism
QUOTE(MrJim @ Jan 28 2006, 10:59 AM)
So why do we even put up with this crap?  Why aren't lawsuits being filed?  If these people try to pull us into the gutter, why don't we drag them down with us?
*

Did you know we have a drunk and an actual murderer in the White House? I often wondered why the first couple is so publicly *born again* and found out they have much to be born again about. hockey.gif

How is that?
70sliberalism
QUOTE(Indianhead @ Jan 28 2006, 04:41 PM)
Just like Joe McCarthy...eventually they will
take on someone who isn't afraid...isn't soft...
then there's a fight...then the public is engaged.
*

Are you today announcing an exploratory committe to gage your viability as a candidate?


clap.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.