Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Life in OUR America, Volume 5
Common Ground Common Sense > Online Café > Off-Topic > Off-Topic Archive
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 11 2006, 04:16 PM)
Well ....

We're just simple country folk up here in the hinterlands of civilization, Snuffysmith ....

And so ...

We have to see things as they are ....

Rather than how we might wish them to be ....

And so ....

And speaking of seeing things the way they might be, anyway ...

"Developing Nor'easter Heads Up East Coast"

By MATTHEW VERRINDER, Associated Press Writer

1 hour, 19 minutes ago

TRENTON, N.J. - A developing nor'easter headed up the East Coast on Saturday with a threat of heavy, blowing snow, putting road crews on overtime and cheering up skiers in a region spared harsh weather for most of this season.

Blizzard warnings were posted from the New York City area into eastern New England, where up to 15 inches of snow was possible, and a winter storm warning was issued for most of New Jersey, the National Weather Service said.

Heavy snow warnings were in effect from eastern Kentucky to southeastern New York state.


The New Jersey Department of Transportation had 600 trucks ready to plow snow and spread salt, plus 1,100 contractor trucks, the department said.

The department also had its regular maintenance staff of 735 employees, plus more than 400 other state employees, available to operate plows.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey had more than 160 pieces of heavy snow equipment at the New York region's Newark, Kennedy and LaGuardia airports.

Despite the likelihood that drivers would have to dig their cars out Sunday morning, the storm was great news for northern New Jersey's Hidden Valley Resort and its 12 ski slopes, said Roni Mattiello, director of snow sports.

"It means great, fresh powder to ski in tomorrow," Mattiello said.

"It will help us open terrain on the mountain that hasn't been opened yet because of the mild winter."

"Everyone is psyched and pumped up for skiing," she said.

Not all sports fans were elated, however.

New York's Aqueduct race track canceled Sunday's horse racing schedule.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 7 2006, 04:07 PM)
I have always thought ..

And always stated ....

That as a United States Senator ....

That is what John Kerry should be ....

And I think that he is finally starting to grow into that role, myself .....

And as a Senator, the nature of any "fight" that he is involved in should be one of wits and wisdom ...

Not fisticuffs ....

Nor demagoguery .......

Dear Livyjr,

In the last 24 hours, we've seen troubling reports that Dick Cheney directed "Scooter" Libby to release classified information to discredit critics of the war in Iraq...

We've heard hard-to-ignore accusations from a former top CIA official that the White House "cherry picked" intelligence to make the case for war...

And we've received stunning evidence that the president sat on his hands and did nothing for 12 hours after the White House had been informed that the levees broke in New Orleans.

Enough is enough.

Yesterday, we launched our nine-month Break Their Grip on Power campaign and thousands of people from all across the nation have already acted.

Let's expose the culture of corruption that has engulfed the Republican Congress and the culture of incompetence that has swallowed up the White House.

Let's get the focus back on solving the enormous challenges the people of this country are facing because of lack of leadership from Washington.

Every step of the way in 2006, we'll support Democratic candidates - giving them the help they need to break the Republicans' grip on power.

And, when the Republicans and their henchmen launch their vicious attacks on our candidates, we'll fight back with force and redouble our support for any candidate they target.

That's what it's going to take to win - nine months of relentless effort.

And it has to start now.

Let's go to work.

Sincerely,

John Kerry

Click on this URL to take action now
http://capwiz.com/congressorg/pyv/electors/
Livyjr
And here is an update on a TAY-RIZM case from REPUBLICAN George Pataki's capital city of Albany, New York that we have been tracking in here ....

And actually, I started tracking this case on the old John Kerry forum ....

Before the November 2004 elections ....

When this "big bust" was made ...

And REPUBLICAN BUSH WATER-CARRIER George Pataki had his face right there on the TV ....

Telling us how lucky we were to have REPUBLICANS in power here in OUR America ....

And how sorry we would be ....

If George W. Bush lost to Democrat John Kerry ....

The PATAKI STING .....

And DUE PROCESS OF LAW is right out the window ....

Here in George W. Bush's America ...

"Imam loses 4th bid for release - Albany suspect in FBI terror sting still danger to society, jurist rules"

By MICHELE MORGAN BOLTON, Staff writer, Albany, New York Times Union

First published: Saturday, February 11, 2006

ALBANY -- An imam at an Albany mosque facing terrorism charges lost his fourth bid for bail Friday, despite a lawyer's impassioned plea that he is a peaceful, deeply religious man desperately needed by his family and faith.

"To be isolated from every other human being, especially if you're a social person, has a devastating effect," said lawyer Terence L. Kindlon.

"Over the course of the past several months he has become profoundly depressed."

Yassin Aref, 35, has been held in 22-hour-a-day protective confinement in the Rensselaer County Jail since Sept. 30, when U.S. Magistrate Judge David Homer revoked his bail after 13 months of electronically monitored house arrest.

Aref and his co-defendant, Mohammed Hossain, an Albany pizza shop owner, were caught in an FBI sting beginning in August 2003 in which they allegedly took part in a fake plot to sell missile launchers to terrorists.

Hossain is free on bail.


A superseding indictment in September also charged the Iraqi refugee with having documented connections to key terrorist figures in the Middle East.

Friday's detention hearing, again before Homer, was the fourth for Aref.

Kindlon offered three new pieces of information he said warranted Aref's release.

First, he said, government red tape could delay a trial until at least 2007, violating the right to due process.

Assistant U.S. Attorney William Pericak brushed off Kindlon's claims, saying, "I think the case will be tried long before January."


Kindlon also noted that Aref's wife, who has a mental illness, is struggling to care for three young children and a newborn on public support and isolated by language barriers.

"They talk once a week, and they cry," Kindlon said.

"In her culture there is no such thing as a single mother."

"A woman is an extension of a man."

Finally, he said, there are national published reports that say the Bush administration's National Security Agency's penchant for potentially illegal, warrantless wiretapping was specifically responsible for Aref's arrest.

If so, such criminal activity requires the indictment to be tossed immediately, Kindlon said.


He believes prosecutors have made too much of Aref's private journal entries that allegedly link him to terrorist activity.

Kindlon said his client is not guilty.

He said he is yet to see any of the government's evidence.

"The government has issued secret security clearances to me and my colleague yet as of today we've seen no classified information," he said.

"I guess they've taken the position we don't need to see it."

"In the meanwhile, my client is rotting in jail."


Pericak asserted to Homer there is nothing new to consider.

He said both the journal entries and family situation are not new.

And Kindlon's request to toss the case based on the NSA allegations is the subject of a March 13 hearing, he said.

Homer agreed that Kindlon's arguments produced new issues but said they didn't persuade him Aref deserves to be free.

Five months in jail doesn't begin to approach an excess, Homer said.

He agreed that the March hearing will address wiretap issues.

"There is a tragic element to the effect of detention," the judge said.

"But it is the judicial function not to be affected by the tragedy."

"The effect on Mrs. Aref and the children is not a material fact."

There may well be innocent explanations for Aref's journal entries, but the current conclusion is they show he has substantial ties to terrorism and, thus, is a danger to society, Homer said.

During arguments, Aref bowed his head, and then gestured vehemently to Kindlon as the judge issued his decision.

Aref's wife, children and other family filed quietly from court, refusing to comment.

Outside, Kindlon said he was desperately disappointed with the decision, his client is heartbroken, but it doesn't stop here.

When asked if he thinks the federal government is tapping lawyers' phones, Kindlon unloaded:

"I think anyone's phone may be tapped."

"This administration is acting lawlessly."

"They don't give a damn about the Constitution."

"Every time I hear George Bush speak, I think someone should really read that guy his Miranda rights."


end quotes

For the record, Terry Kindlon served in Viet Nam ....

In combat ....

Where he was wounded in the head ....

And quite seriously so ..

And so ...

He is entitled to express his opinion on this administration ....

And what he calls its lawlessness .....

And as a fellow wounded combat veteran from the Viet Nam ...

I have to salute his candor ....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 11 2006, 05:01 PM)
And here is an update on a TAY-RIZM case from REPUBLICAN George Pataki's capital city of Albany, New York that we have been tracking in here ....

And actually, I started tracking this case on the old John Kerry forum ....

Before the November 2004 elections ....

When this "big bust" was made ...

And REPUBLICAN BUSH WATER-CARRIER George Pataki had his face right there on the TV ....

Telling us how lucky we were to have REPUBLICANS in power here in OUR America ....

And how sorry we would be ....

If George W. Bush lost to Democrat John Kerry ....

The PATAKI STING .....

And DUE PROCESS OF LAW is right out the window ....

Here in George W. Bush's America ...


"Imam loses 4th bid for release - Albany suspect in FBI terror sting still danger to society, jurist rules" 
 
By MICHELE MORGAN BOLTON, Staff writer, Albany, New York Times Union

First published: Saturday, February 11, 2006

Outside, Kindlon said he was desperately disappointed with the decision, his client is heartbroken, but it doesn't stop here.

When asked if he thinks the federal government is tapping lawyers' phones, Kindlon unloaded:

"I think anyone's phone may be tapped."

"This administration is acting lawlessly."

"They don't give a damn about the Constitution."

"Every time I hear George Bush speak, I think someone should really read that guy his Miranda rights."

"Cartoon fails test of tolerance"

By AHMED NEZAR KOBEISY
Albany, New York Times Union
First published: Saturday, February 11, 2006

A Danish newspaper's publication of a cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad wearing a turban shaped like a time bomb has fueled the Muslim world with anger and led to protests and violence.

The republication of that cartoon and of others that negatively portray Muslims is more evidence of the fragility of our global village.

Many people, particularly in the West, do not understand why Muslims are outraged.

Some have suggested that their anger is caused by the Islamic prohibition on drawing images of the Prophet Muhammad and that Muslims are trying to impose their norms of respecting the sacred on others, particularly in Europe, who, so they claim, have thrived on criticizing religions.

The real issue is the characterization of the Prophet Muhammad -- the most revered human being to Muslims and many non-Muslims who have studied his life -- as a terrorist.

Islam welcomes objective and rational criticism and debate.

It respects freedom of speech and of choosing one's religion or even no religion at all.

It does not allow the unfounded and unjustified negative portrayal of others, particularly people who are worthy of respect and reverence.

I would be offended if Jesus, Moses or Abraham were portrayed in a demeaning manner.


The caricature of the Prophet Muhammad reinforces a widespread stereotype of Islam as a religion of violence and of Muslims as terrorists.

It is a continuation of the Orientalists' view of Islam that since medieval times has portrayed the Prophet Muhammad as a Christian heretic and the followers of Islam as barbaric.

Those images are employed to deepen the divide between the two worlds and prevent mutual understanding and respect.

The cartoons that unleashed a worldwide wave of anger are not an innocent expression of personal opinion.

Muslims, like everyone else, have the right to express their resentment and rejection of what they perceive as offensive.

I believe the violence associated with the protests over the cartoons have been the acts of an emotionally driven mob that hijacked an inflamed situation.

I also believe that negative portrayals of Muslims have incited violent hate crimes against Muslim individuals, families and institutions in the United States and Europe.

Publishing offensive cartoons may be legal, but it is not acceptable to speak hatefully of any other group of people religious or otherwise.

The current controversy is about the blatant discrimination against people because of their religion.

Freedom of speech should not lead to hateful remarks or acts against a group on the basis of religion or color, race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation.

The newspapers that published the initial cartoon and many more offensive ones have failed the test of tolerance and respect.

To live in peace and harmony, diverse cultures must interact and get to know each other, appreciate their differences and celebrate their commonalties.

Ahmed Nezar Kobeisy is imam and director of the Islamic Center of the Capital District.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Jan 29 2006 @ 05:20 PM)
And speaking of George W. Bush ....

And incompetence ...

And ineptness .....

And the squandering of OUR United States tax dollars by George and his ....

We have ....

Surprise, surprise, surprise ....

"Audit: U.S.-Led Occupation Squandered Aid"

By JIM KRANE, Associated Press Writer

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - Iraqi money gambled away in the Philippines.

Thousands spent on a swimming pool that was never used.

An elevator repaired so poorly that it crashed, killing people.

A U.S. government audit found American-led occupation authorities squandered tens of millions of dollars that were supposed to be used to rebuild Iraq through undocumented spending and outright fraud.

In some cases, auditors recommend criminal charges be filed against the perpetrators.

In others, it asks the U.S. ambassador to Iraq to recoup the money.

Dryly written audit reports describe the Coalition Provisional Authority's offices in the south-central city of Hillah being awash in bricks of $100 bills taken from a central vault without documentation.

It describes one agent who kept almost $700,000 in cash in an unlocked footlocker and mentions a U.S. soldier who gambled away as much as $60,000 in reconstruction funds in the Philippines.

"Tens of millions of dollars in cash had gone in and out of the South-Central Region vault without any tracking of who deposited or withdrew the money, and why it was taken out," says a report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, which is in the midst of a series of audits for the Pentagon and State Department.

Much of the first audit reports deal with contracting in south-central Iraq, one of the country's least-hostile regions.

Audits have yet to be released for the occupation authority's spending in the rest of Iraq.

The audits offer a window into the chaotic U.S.-led occupation of Iraq of 2003-04, when inexperienced American officials — including workers from President Bush's election campaign — organized a cash-intensive "hearts and minds" mission to rebuild Iraq's devastated economy.

But the corruption and incompetence documented in the reports reveal that much of the effort, however well-intentioned, was wasted.

The failure of the rebuilding effort has been borne out most vividly by the rise of a virulent anti-American insurgency that has claimed most of the 2,237 U.S. military lives lost since the war began.

In some cases, auditors could find no trace of cash, much of which came from Iraqi oil revenues overseen by the occupation authority.

"Those deficiencies were so significant that we were precluded from accomplishing our stated objectives," the auditors said of U.S. officials in Hillah being unable to account for $97 million of the $120 million in Iraqi oil revenues earmarked for rebuilding projects.

An October 2005 audit found documentation for the spending of just $8 million of that money.

Negligence proved deadly in at least one case.

Three Iraqis plummeted to their deaths in an elevator in the Hillah General Hospital that was certified to have been replaced by a contractor who received $662,800.

Also in Hillah, occupation officials spent $108,140 to replace pumps and fix the city's Olympic swimming pool.

But the contractor merely polished the old plumbing to make it look new and collected his money.

When the pool was filled, the water came out a murky brown and the pool's reopening had to be canceled.

The reports did not identify the contractors involved.

Auditors have asked the U.S. ambassador to recover a total of $571,823 that the reports describe as overpaid funds.

In some cases, cash simply disappeared.

Two occupation authority field agents responsible for paying contractors left Iraq without accounting for more than $700,000 each.

When auditors confronted their manager and asked where the money was, the manger tried to clear one of the agents through false paperwork.

"This appears to be an attempt to remove outstanding balances by simply washing accounts," the auditor said.

The two agents were not identified and there was no word on whether the pair were referred for prosecution.

One report describes mismanagement of more than 2,000 small contracts in south-central Iraq worth $88 million.

Occupation staffers or those they supervised handed out millions to companies that never submitted required competitive bids or that were paid for unfinished work.

Other examples cited in the reports:

_Only a quarter of $23 million entrusted to civilian and military project and contracting officers to pay contractors ever found its way to those contractors.

_One contractor was paid $14,000 on four separate occasions for the same job.

_Of $7.3 million spent on a police academy near Hillah, auditors could account for just $4 million. They said $1.3 million was wasted on overpriced or duplicate construction or equipment not delivered. More than $2 million was missing.

_U.S. personnel "needlessly disbursed more than $1.8 million" of the estimated $2.3 million spent for renovating the library in the Shiite holy city of Karbala.

_The library contractor delivered only 18 of 68 personal computers called for and did not install Internet wiring or software. The computers worked only as stand-alones.

_The U.S.-led security transition command spent $945,000 for seven armored Mercedes-Benzes that were too lightly armored for Iraq. Auditors were able to account for only six of the cars.

_At one point, several paying agents kept cash inside the same filing cabinet in the Hillah vault. One agent took $100,000 from another's stack of cash to clear his own balance. "This was only discovered because the other paying agent had to make a disbursement that day and realized that he was short cash," the report says.

___

On the Net:

Special Inspector General: http://www.sigir.mil/audit(underscore)reports.html

And while George W. Bush ....

Loots OUR national treasury .....

And sends OUR tax dollars over to IRAQINAM to allegedly rebuild that country ....

Where they disappear ....

With nothing to show for their loss ....

But more chaos ....

We have from right here in OUR own country ....

This following .....

"A flood of questions amid fear of disaster - Schenectady meeting sends message to New York City officials urging speedy repair to Gilboa Dam"

By DAN HIGGINS, Staff writer, Albany, New York Times Union

First published: Friday, February 10, 2006

SCHENECTADY -- Even though crews are making emergency repairs to the Gilboa Dam this winter, large-scale renovations won't begin until 2008.

The news seemed to surprise members of the state Assembly Thursday, who heard testimony on dam safety at a public hearing at Schenectady County Community College.

The Assembly members, representing committees on environmental conservation and government operations, joined local and federal officials in urging New York City to work faster to bring the Schoharie County dam up to current safety standards.

The Gilboa Dam is owned by New York City and maintained by its Department of Environmental Protection.

The DEP commissioner, Emily Lloyd, said her department is moving as fast as possible on the $200 million project, and that the delay is because the city wants to carefully design the dam upgrades.

Local officials are worried about a dam failure, a worst-case scenario that DEP officials said was possible after a routine inspection in October revealed weaknesses in the 79-year-old structure.

If it failed, thousands of people would be homeless and property from Schoharie to Schenectady would be under more than 10 feet of water.

"If the dam fails, there aren't enough lawyers in Manhattan," to handle resulting lawsuits against New York City, U.S. Rep. Michael McNulty, D-Green Island, who was angry with the pace of repairs.


The daylong hearing Thursday was intended to get public input on how to improve the state's dam-inspection program.

But the Gilboa Dam took center stage.

The October inspection revealed the dam could slide off the underlying bedrock in the event of a massive rainstorm combined with record snowmelt.

It holds back 19 billion gallons of water on the Schoharie Creek and is one of 20 maintained by the city for downstate drinking water.

That worst-case scenario prompted communities as far north as Duanesburg to begin making emergency plans in case of a catastrophe.

New York's emergency repairs include adding siphons to drain out extra water and anchoring the dam to the bedrock.

That work won't be complete until September, which is too slow for some who testified Thursday at Schenectady County Community College.

Susan Savage, the chairwoman of the Schenectady County Legislature, told the committee that the hearing room they sat in Thursday would be inundated with 3 to 5 feet of water, even though the dam is nearly 60 miles away.

Six hundred buildings in Schenectady and Scotia would suffer some flood damage, and drinking water and sewage systems would be harmed.

McNulty also said he was angry because a letter he wrote to New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg dated Jan. 11 outlining concerns about the dam has gone unanswered.

Lloyd said Bloomberg is aware of how serious the situation is, and that his deputy mayor would visit the dam sometime this spring.

Rainy weather has slowed emergency repairs, but crews are waiting near the dam seven days a week for better conditions.

In the next 10 years, Lloyd said, the city will spend more than $400 million to repair or upgrade all of its aging dams.

Dan Higgins can be reached at 454-5523 or by e-mail at dhiggins@timesunion.com.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 11 2006, 05:01 PM)
Outside, Kindlon said he was desperately disappointed with the decision, his client is heartbroken, but it doesn't stop here.

When asked if he thinks the federal government is tapping lawyers' phones, Kindlon unloaded:

"I think anyone's phone may be tapped."

"This administration is acting lawlessly."

"They don't give a damn about the Constitution."

"Every time I hear George Bush speak, I think someone should really read that guy his Miranda rights."

"Bill of Rights can't be a casualty of war"

By HOWARD A. BROCK

Albany, New York Times Union
First published: Thursday, February 9, 2006

In "Godfather III," Michael Corleone plaintively cried out, "Just when I thought that I was out, they pull me back in."

Lately, I've been feeling a bit like Michael Corleone.

No, I am not a Mafia don.

I'm a Democratic activist, retired, who has been drifting away in a sea of frustration and disgust from the party only to be dragged back by Republican actions, attitudes and comments.

Today, we have the imbroglio over the Patriot Act and the confounding arrogance of President Bush in his specious arguments about his right to tap, without warrants, the telephones of Americans.

But wait, these are not new issues.

For me, it's deja vu.

I'm transported back 55 years, to when I first decided to throw my lot in with the Democrats.

The Republicans adhered to the trickle-down theory of economics (they still do), were anti-union and against the minimum wage (they still are), opposed to the safety net and a national health program (ditto) and were generally against the entire New Deal, which saved capitalism, altered the relationship between the states and the federal government, and gave some hope to the system's losers.

That's quite a record of opposition, but it was the sudden and vicious turning on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights by the Republicans that really decided things for me.

They used their membership on the House Un-American Activities Committee like a whip, lashing across the constitutional rights of members of the entertainment industry.

They summarily dismissed rights of witnesses, jailed some people and ruined many others.

The actions of the committee members were shocking to my young mind especially since our nation had just completed a world war to secure our basic rights.


Some memories stand out from the quick kaleidoscope of events.

Humphrey Bogart and Danny Kaye, who organized a protest against the committee, were cowed into retreating by their Hollywood bosses.

Larry Parks, the star of the "Jolson Story" found that his career reached a dead end.

John Garfield (my favorite) was haunted until his death at age 39.

The careers of writers, producers and directors were shattered.

Sen. Joseph McCarthy, a Republican from Wisconsin, soon came on the scene and with his phony list of communists in the State Department ushered in a political reign of terror without precedence in the United States.

Harry Truman, supposedly immune from intimidation, fell victim to McCarthy's pressure and initiated loyalty oaths as a prerequisite for employment by the federal government.

The Eisenhower administration, by failing to face up to the threat of "McCarthyism," became an enabler.

Red Channels, a publication, listed the names of those who were deemed not fit for employment because of their past political activities.

Republicans generally exploited the situation for political gain.

Charges of treason were not uncommon.


In some cases such accusations were made again later in connection with the anti-Vietnam War activities and have appeared still again concerning those who oppose the war on Iraq.


It was not always thus.

History tells us of numerous instances when rights were at risk.

Examples are the introduction by Federalist John Adams of the Alien and Sedition Acts, and actions by two of our most venerated presidents, Republican Abraham Lincoln and Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Lincoln was considered by many to be approaching dictatorship as he suspended the right of habeas corpus, imprisoned many citizens and closed down newspapers.

FDR, in the early days of World War II, rounded up American citizens and threw them into camps because of their Japanese ancestry.

The Supreme Court countenanced the act.

There were also constitutionally threatening actions in the administrations of Presidents Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt, Wilson, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan and Clinton.

The record speaks loudly and eloquently for the need for checks and balances.

George W. Bush has the potential to become the worst of the bunch.

Those few who objected to creation of the court under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act have been proved right.

An overwhelming number of requests for warrants has been approved.

Now the FISA court has been ignored by Bush.

The slippery slope has a slippery slope.

While previous presidents may have tipped the ship of state or brought it close to capsizing, it was soon or eventually righted again.

Estimates of how long the war on terror will last have been as high as 50 years.

Some say it will never be over.

If Bush is allowed to get away with his actions, his successors -- whatever their party -- will treat them as permanent, accepted practices.

Have we, as columnist Nat Hentoff has written, already "kissed the Fourth Amendment goodbye?"

If so, it is only the beginning.


By my calculation, the Bush administration is pursuing policies that jeopardize the right of habeus corpus and the First, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments.

The American people must resolve a couple of imminent major questions.

Can we fight the war on terror without the Bill of Rights becoming a casualty?

If one of those rights does fall, will it not be a considerable victory for our enemies?

Howard A. Brock lives in Altamont. He is a former talk-radio host and political strategist.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 10 2006, 07:06 PM)
And talk about HACK-O-CRATS ....

In the HACKOCRACY of George W. Bush ....

Here's another one gone ....

And HOORAY for that say I ....

"Man Who Left NASA Says He's Under Attack"

Thu Feb 9, 9:35 PM ET

COLLEGE STATION, Texas - A staffer who resigned from    NASA after he was accused of restricting access to a noted climate scientist said Thursday he was targeted because of his political ties.

George C. Deutsch, 24, resigned from the agency's public relations department earlier this week.

"What you do have is hearsay coming from a handful of people who have clear partisan ties and they are really coming after me as a Bush appointee," he told radio station WTAW.

"I was an easy target."

"I was low-hanging fruit."

The New York Times reported Wednesday that Deutsch attempted to limit reporters' access to Jim Hansen, a noted NASA climate scientist, and insisted that a Web designer insert the word "theory" before any mention of the Big Bang.

Deutsch denied the allegations.

"I have never been told to censor science, to squelch anything or to insert religion into any issue, absolutely not," said the former Bush campaign worker.

*

"The world is treading on thin ice"

By DERRICK Z. JACKSON

Albany, New York Times Union
First published: Tuesday, February 7, 2006

The burning issue was the thin ice encrusted on the boulders.

The rocks were half-submerged in a small stream at the foot of the White Mountains in Maine.

Ribbons of water swirled around them, propelled by two days of nonstop rain.

That was the first problem.

It was mid-January.

In northern New England, the rain usually would have been a foot of snow.


The boulders would have been smothered into giant marshmallows.

This aberration was amplified by the seductive warmth in Boston.

For the first time in about a quarter century of Januarys, I jogged around the Charles River on consecutive weekends in shorts.

The coup de ice came at the end of January when NASA's chief climate scientist, James Hansen, said Bush administration minions were muffling his warnings on global warming.

Hansen said officials at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in recent months have canceled or rejected interview requests for him and appointed monitors for approved interviews.

He reportedly was ordered last fall to remove preliminary information from the Internet that said last year might be the warmest year on record.

Last week, NASA announced that 2005 was indeed the warmest on record.

"In my three decades in government, I've never seen control of communications to the public so constrained," Hansen said last week.

"Communications from government scientists have never been so constrained."


Hansen, 63, said NASA, which denies any censorship, seemed particularly petrified by a December speech he gave in San Francisco before other earth and space scientists.

He said "business as usual" will lead to a "different planet."

The temperature will rise about 5 degrees Fahrenheit over this century to a warmth not seen for 3 million years, a time when sea levels were eight stories higher than today.

The human-induced melting of polar ice could bring those eight stories of water back in mere centuries, not a more natural timing of many thousands of years.

Hansen said we can beat the tipping point for runaway change if the United States leads global efforts to limit or eliminate greenhouse gases and pollutants.

There is no margin for business as usual.

It appears we will lose more time.

In his State of the Union address, Bush said, "America is addicted to oil," but did not mention the top first step environmentalists and scientists say the United States must take to fight global warming -- higher fuel-efficiency for cars.

He said he wanted to support more math and science for schoolchildren and more research in the physical sciences.

But if his minions ignore and stifle the best scientists we have today, there is no point.


In the early days of the Bush administration, Hansen's credentials earned him two invitations to address Vice President Dick Cheney's secretive, industry-packed energy task force.

He spoke two years ago to U.S. auto executives at ExxonMobil headquarters.

The White House went on to urge energy drilling at all costs.

Auto execs rebuffed Hansen on fuel efficiency by saying they only give consumers what they want.

"After the meeting, I watched TV and saw all these ads, with cars on top of mountain peaks and fantastic vistas of the American West," Hansen said.

"It's like the cigarette ads that use sex to sell."

"All the average person does with an SUV is commute to work or the store."

"They're creating a market they claim the public is demanding."

Listening to Hansen, it was clear he will continue to speak out for science despite the special interests.

He said the last time he checked, democracy only works when the public is well informed.

"For instance, they're using the economy as the reason not to consider taking action," Hansen said.

"I've been chastised for being a scientist saying we are damaging the economy in the long run."

"But you need to look at the broad problem."

"I think I'm free to do so and free to have my opinion."


The melting polar ice and the thin ice cap on the river boulder in Maine wait for America to listen to the right opinion.

The ice cube is the new canary warning of doom.

If we do not listen, it will melt in one place, and drown us in another.

Derrick Z. Jackson writes for the Boston Globe. His e-mail address is jackson@globe.com
Livyjr
And since we are on the subject of the "environment" in here, at the moment ....

"Travel Snarls as Snow Blankets Northast"

By SAMANTHA GROSS, Associated Press Writer

17 minutes ago

NEW YORK - The region's first major storm this winter brought lightning and 6 inches of snow to New York City on Sunday and a foot of snow to parts of New Jersey, canceling flights across the Northeast and knocking out power to hundreds of homes.

The New York metro area and much of the Northeast were under a blizzard warning, with the National Weather Service predicting winds up to 50 mph could bring down trees and power lines.

Heavy snow warnings were issued from eastern Kentucky to New England.


On average, 12 to 18 inches of snow were expected throughout the metro region, with temperatures as low as 23 degrees, forecasters said.

In Wayne, N.J., a foot of snow had accumulated Sunday, National Weather Service meteorologist Michael Silva said.

Hundreds of New Jersey homes were without power late Saturday.

In a rare display, lightning bolts joined the snow over LaGuardia Airport, where most airlines had canceled all flights until Sunday afternoon.

Delta, Delta Shuttle and American Airlines had canceled all flights at the airport until Monday, said Steve Coleman, spokesman for The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

More than 100 Sunday flights were canceled at John F. Kennedy International airport, including all Delta flights, and several carriers canceled most or all of their Sunday departing flights at Newark Liberty International.

Delta said it canceled its Sunday arrivals and departures at several other airports in the storm's path, including those in Philadelphia; Boston; Baltimore; Newark; Providence, R.I.; Washington, D.C.; and Hartford, Conn.

Four inches of snow had accumulated in parts of Fairfax, Va. late Saturday, and crews worked to clear the runways at Washington Dulles International Airport in suburban Virginia.

But the storm is good news and free advertising for ski resorts after an unseasonably warm January dragged down business, said Betsy Strickler at Jiminy Peak ski resort in western Massachusetts.

"The best PR is when people look up in the sky ... see the snow start to fall," she said.

In the hours before the snow began falling, New York residents formed long lines at supermarkets as they stocked up on bottled water and basic supplies.

The city's 353 salt-spreading plow trucks went out with 200,000 tons of rock salt on hand, said Kathy Dawkins, spokeswoman for the Department of Sanitation.

Twenty machines throughout the five boroughs would be melting up to 60 tons of snow per hour, she said.

The department's trucks have some 6,300 miles of city streets and roads to plow — about the distance from New York to Los Angeles and back, Dawkins said.

The New Jersey Department of Transportation had 600 trucks ready to plow snow and spread salt, plus 1,100 contractor trucks, the department said.

Officials also lowered the speed limit on the entire length of the New Jersey Turnpike to 45 mph.

About 2,100 road workers were on the job and more than 1,900 salt trucks and plows were out clearing roads around the Maryland — nearly a full deployment, officials said.
___

Associated Press writers Nahal Toosi and Desmond Butler in New York City, Bruce Shipkowski in Trenton, Sarah Brumfield in Baltimore and Brandie M. Jefferson in Boston contributed to this report.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 11 2006, 06:37 PM)
"The world is treading on thin ice" 
 
By DERRICK Z. JACKSON

Albany, New York Times Union
First published: Tuesday, February 7, 2006

Listening to Hansen, it was clear he will continue to speak out for science despite the special interests.

He said the last time he checked, democracy only works when the public is well informed.

"For instance, they're using the economy as the reason not to consider taking action," Hansen said.

"I've been chastised for being a scientist saying we are damaging the economy in the long run."

"But you need to look at the broad problem."

"I think I'm free to do so and free to have my opinion."

And from the "environment" .....

We jump over to politics ....

And specifically REPUBLICAN politics ...

Which certainly have an adverse effect on the environment ...

BUT ...

We are not supposed to talk about that ...

A GAG ORDER is in effect from the WHITE HOUSE on that subject ...

The environment, I mean ...

Because we are not supposed to know that there is GLOBAL WARMING ...

Or that this past year was the warmest on record ....

We are supposed to believe instead that we are a bunch of witless, mindless cattle out in a feedlot somewhere ...

And that George W. Bush and the REPUBLICANS have everything under control ...

And that they have OUR best interests at heart ....

And ....

But we are not that stupid, are we?

"New name possible in Senate race"

By ELIZABETH BENJAMIN, Capitol bureau, Albany, New York Times Union

First published: Sunday, February 12, 2006

ALBANY -- A former high-ranking national security official in three Republican presidential administrations is contemplating a challenge to U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.

But state GOP and Conservative leaders say it may be too late for her to mount a credible campaign.

Kathleen Troia "KT" McFarland, who was the highest-ranking woman in the Pentagon from 1982-85 as deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Public Affairs and speechwriter to Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger, confirmed Saturday she is eyeing the Senate race.

McFarland, a 54-year-old Manhattan resident, mother of five and grandmother of three who has never held elected office, had been raising money for a possible run against Democratic U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney.

But in recent weeks, McFarland said, she has been urged by "people in New York and Washington," whom she refused to identify, to consider a run against Clinton instead.


"Running against an incumbent, any incumbent, is never an easy challenge, but I am indeed giving it serious thought," McFarland said.

"I'm talking to Conservative leaders and Republican leaders and trying to get their feedback."

After spending the past two decades as a stay-at-home mom, McFarland said the Sept. 11 attacks inspired her to consider putting her past security experience to use in public life.

McFarland has raised $429,925 and had $390,864 on hand at the end of December, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

She said she will likely announce which office she will seek, if any, within the next few weeks.

In the meantime, she plans to focus on meeting New York's political leaders.

Christian Winthrop, a spokesman to former Yonkers Mayor John Spencer, who is the front-runner for the GOP nod in the Senate race and appears poised to land the Conservative line as well, derided McFarland as a "pro-abortion, big government, elitist liberal."

"If she wants to run for Senate, he added, "I suggest she try the Democrat Party."


McFarland confirmed she believes in a "woman's right to choose."

She favors parental notification and a ban on late-term partial-birth abortions.

"To me , a liberal is someone who supports civil rights for people," McFarland said.

"I don't know what liberal means to Mr. Spencer."

"We haven't had that conversation."

McFarland could fill the role Republican strategists once hoped former Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro would play: An aggressive woman with liberal leanings on social issues that would force Clinton to the left during her re-election campaign and potentially bloody her up before a widely expected 2008 White House run.


Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson on Saturday did not appeared concerned about McFarland.

"It appears once again that the Republican field is unsettled," Wolfson said.

State Republican Chairman Stephen Minarik said he has met with McFarland, and while he was impressed with her energy and professional experience, he told her getting into the Senate race now would be difficult.

"I told her it was a very late time to enter, and that it seemed that many of the county chairs had already made up their minds," Minarik said.

Spencer, who entered the Senate race last June, became the Republican front-runner in December when Pirro, who had been backed by Minarik, ended her troubled bid for federal office to run for state attorney general.


State Conservative Party Chairman Mike Long said he met with McFarland last week, but could not be encouraging about her chances of landing his party's line.

"I told her she was getting started a little late," the chairman said.

Long said he plans to ask the Conservative Party's executive committee to endorse Spencer on Monday at the end of the party's two-day meeting in Albany.

Elizabeth Benjamin can be reached at 454-5081 or by e-mail at ebenjamin@timesunion.com.
Livyjr
And of course, we can't talk about "politics" up here in the corrupt State of New York, one of the least, if not the least, democractic state in this union of OURS, without paying HOMAGE to "BIG JOE" Bruno .....

The REPUBLICAN "HAMMER" of the State of New York ...

As "TWO-GUN TEXAS TOMMY" DeLay was for the mighty REPUBLICANS down there in the corrupt REPUBLICAN-controlled TEN-MILES SQUARE of Washington, D.C. .....

"BIG JOE", or the "IRON DUKE", as he is affectionately known here in his DUKEDOM of Rensselaer County in the State of New York has been a FIXTURE of local politics up here for quite a while now ....

Since the 1980's, anyway ...

And if you think a snake has got twists and turns to it as it goes along ...

That snake cannot hold a candle to "BIG JOE" as he wends his way through the political swamp that politics is up here ....

Like that snake smelling a mouse in a tiny hole in a log a mile away ..

OUR "IRON DUKE" has a nose on him that can smell a dollar in a lobbyist's pocket anywhere in the world ...

And so ..

Never fear ....

OUR "BIG JOE" will find a way, come hell or high water, to get himself to where that dollar is ...

And so ....

"Bruno finds way to fly free"

Albany, New York Times Union
First published: Monday, February 6, 2006

When the Pataki administration told Senate Majority Leader Joseph L. Bruno he couldn't use a state helicopter, the Brunswick Republican wasn't about to be grounded.

He found another way to fly, and still didn't have to pay the tab.


On Nov. 29, Bruno was told by the Pataki administration that the state helicopter was tied up that day.

The chopper is frequently made available to Bruno for government business after the senator certifies to State Police he is using it for official work.

But after being told he'd get the copter and then abruptly getting turned down later, Bruno hired a Richmor Aviation jet for his visit to New York City.

He paid the $4,100 tab from his Committee to Re-Elect Senator Bruno campaign account, state records show.

That's less than half the cost of a round-trip for the aircraft, Richmor officials say, indicating Bruno must have taken it only one way and someone else used it coming back.

So the question remains:

was Bruno on state business, entitling him to the state helicopter, or political business, justifying his taking the money from his campaign fund?


"Senator Bruno had government meetings," said Bruno spokesman Mark Hansen.

The helicopter "was canceled at short notice; he had to get down there, and it was the most convenient way to get down there."

Hansen wouldn't say why the campaign was billed for state business, nor would he identify the business.

Bruno has said he was meeting with horse industry interests and trying to talk Mayor Michael Bloomberg into running for governor.


The senator's campaign donors also paid for another $16,100 in airfare for three other flights, perhaps for his trip to horse country in Kentucky, although Hansen wouldn't say; $11,246 for hundreds of school children to attend a Tri-City Valley Cats game at Joseph L. Bruno Stadium in Troy; and $7,987.67 for Senate Director of Communications John McArdle to "meet with Italian Government Officials," the campaign records show.

In September, McArdle accompanied Bruno to Italy to visit wine country and the senator's family homeland.

Although it is unlikely people in Italy will be voting in the senator's re-election bid this November, paying for McArdle's trip with campaign funds, Bruno said, was legitimate and he'd do it again.

Also on the trip were the senator's friend, lobbyist Richard Alteri, and son Ken Bruno, who was also a lobbyist at the time.

Bruno's campaign fund -- used for such things as restaurant meals, flowers, country club expenses and other things that aren't clearly political -- could afford it.

The fund, which has collected $4,000 from Alteri's Cable Television PAC in recent years, contained $2.58 million as of the middle of January after paying $277,100 in bills from the past six months.

Contributors: Capitol bureau reporters Jay Jochnowitz and James M. Odato. Got a tip? Call 454-5424 or e-mail jjochnowitz@timesunion.com. For more Capitol Confidential items on-line, visit blogs.timesunion.com/capitol/
Livyjr
And before I go back out to tend the fire for today ....

I want to leave this thought on "QUALITIES" to look for in a "LEADER" from the MEDITATIONS of the "GOOD EMPORER" Marcus Aurelius .....

Perhaps IF George W. Bush and that arrogant, over-weaning, self-important, hypocritical crowd of his had actually read some history, instead of trying to fill us up with this twaddle about them not needing to, because they are the ones that write it instead ....

This world of OURS could have been a different place ...

"Two kinds of readiness are constantly needed ...."

"To do ONLY what the logos of authority and law directs ...."

"WITH THE GOOD OF HUMAN BEINGS IN MIND ..."

"And to reconsider your opinion ..."

"When someone can set you straight ..."

"Or convert you to his ..."

"BUT ..."

"Your conversion should always rest on a conviction ..."

"That it's right ..."

"Or benefits others ..."

"NOTHING ELSE!"

"Not because it's more appealing ..."

"Or more popular ...."
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 4 2006, 07:25 AM)
BOOM ....BOOM ......BOOM ....BOOM .....

WAR DRUMS BEATING ...

A big fire burning ....

Dick Cheney, with a special gold-plated Abercrombie & Fitch BI-CENTENNIAL EDITION hatchet at only $750, half-naked, dressed only in a designer breech-clout and a special pair of leggings that he got in a Jackson Hole boutique for $3500, mouth drawn back in a rictus, teeth showing like a big Wyoming GRIZ, massive thighs pumping furiously, whirls and capers and cavorts around the fire like an imp released from the bowels of hell itself, gibbering and alternately grunting in some tongue intelligible to only himself, if even that ....

WHOA, DICK ...

Easy down there, big fellow ....

Easy down ....

You're kind of getting carried away now, here .....

That's it ...

That's it ...

Right, right, right ...

NOW ...

That's it ...

Just put the gun down, there, Dick ...

And everything will be alright ....

Now ...

That's it ...

Just assume the position ....

"Cheney Accidentally Shoots Fellow Hunter"

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

24 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot and wounded a companion during a weekend quail hunting trip in Texas, spraying the fellow hunter in the face and chest with shotgun pellets.

Harry Whittington, a millionaire attorney from Austin, was "alert and doing fine" in a Corpus Christi hospital Sunday after he was shot by Cheney on a ranch in south Texas, said Katharine Armstrong, the property's owner.


He was in stable condition Sunday, said Yvonne Wheeler, spokeswoman for the Christus Spohn Health System in Corpus Christi.

Armstrong in an interview with The Associated Press said Whittington, 78, was mostly injured on his right side, with the pellets hitting his cheek, neck and chest during the incident which occurred late afternoon on Saturday.

She said emergency personnel traveling with Cheney tended to Whittington until the ambulance arrived.

Cheney's spokeswoman, Lea Anne McBride, said the vice president met with Whittington and his wife at the hospital on Sunday.

Cheney "was pleased to see that he's doing fine and in good spirits," she said.

The shooting was first reported by the Corpus Christi Caller-Times.

The vice president's office did not disclose the accident until the day after it happened.

Armstrong said she was watching from a car while Cheney, Whittington and another hunter got out of the vehicle to shoot at a covey of quail.

Whittington shot a bird and went to look for it in the tall grass, while Cheney and the third hunter walked to another spot and discovered a second covey.

Whittington "came up from behind the vice president and the other hunter and didn't signal them or indicate to them or announce himself," Armstrong said.

"The vice president didn't see him," she continued.

"The covey flushed and the vice president picked out a bird and was following it and shot."

"And by god, Harry was in the line of fire and got peppered pretty good."

Whittington has been a private practice attorney in Austin since 1950 and has long been active in Texas Republican politics.


He's been appointed to several state boards, including when then-Gov. George W. Bush named him to the Texas Funeral Service Commission.

McBride did not comment about why the vice president's office did not tell reporters about the accident until the next day.

She referred the question to Armstrong, who could not be reached again Sunday evening.

Armstrong, owner of the Armstrong Ranch where the accident occurred, said Whittington was bleeding and Cheney was very apologetic.

"It broke the skin," she said of the shotgun pellets.

"It knocked him silly."

"But he was fine."

"He was talking."

"His eyes were open."

"It didn't get in his eyes or anything like that."

"Fortunately, the vice president has got a lot of medical people around him and so they were right there and probably more cautious than we would have been," she said.

"The vice president has got an ambulance on call, so the ambulance came."

Cheney is an avid hunter who makes annual hunting trips to South Dakota to hunt pheasants.

He also travels frequently to Arkansas to hunt ducks.

Armstrong said Cheney is a longtime friend who comes to the ranch to hunt about once a year and is "a very safe sportsman."

She said Whittington is a regular, too, but she thought it was the first time the two men hunted together.

"This is something that happens from time to time."

"You now, I've been peppered pretty well myself," said Armstrong.

The 50,000-acre Armstrong ranch has been in the influential south Texas family since the turn of the last century.

Katharine is the daughter of Tobin Armstrong, a politically connected rancher who has been a guest at the White House and spent 48 years as director of the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association.

He died in October.

Cheney was among the dignitaries who attended his funeral.
___

Associated Press writer Paul J. Weber in Dallas contributed to this report.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 12 2006, 05:56 PM)
WHOA, DICK ...

Easy down there, big fellow ....

Easy down ....

You're kind of getting carried away now, here .....

That's it ...

That's it ...

Right, right, right ...

NOW ...

That's it ...

Just put the gun down, there, Dick ...

And everything will be alright ....

Now ...

That's it ...

Just assume the position ....

"Cheney Accidentally Shoots Fellow Hunter"


By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot and wounded a companion during a weekend quail hunting trip in Texas, spraying the fellow hunter in the face and chest with shotgun pellets.

Harry Whittington, a millionaire attorney from Austin, was "alert and doing fine" in a Corpus Christi hospital Sunday after he was shot by Cheney on a ranch in south Texas, said Katharine Armstrong, the property's owner.

Well ....

The BIG GRIZ sure does have tongues wagging all across OUR America this morning .....

And here I am referring to all the news types on such organs of GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA as FOX NEWS FAIR AND BALANCED, YOU DECIDE .....

And the BIG ISSUE right now is the 24-HOUR GAP ....

Kind of like those gaps in the NIXXON WATERGATE TAPES, way back when ....

What happened in that 24-hour period of silence?

The "24-HOUR BLACKOUT", as it is now being called all across OUR America .....

To me, that answer is simple ...

They needed 24 hours to get all the stories straight ....

And then, there is the question of MOTIVE ...

Why the BIG GRIZ shot this guy in the first place ...

A gambling debt, perhaps ....

Some say it was over a woman, but that I'm not at all sure about, myself ....

Or some other kind of "deal" that went bad, especially down there in Texas, which is near the Mexican border of course, where you know what comes across for sale here in OUR America ....

Some wags are saying that with the noose tightening around his own neck, now that SCOOTER looks like he might turn "STATE'S EVIDENCE" against the BIG GRIZ here, that Dick is trying to buy his way back into the good graces of the American people as a "REFORMIST" by blowing away not only a lawyer, but a REPUBLICAN lawyer, but I don't know ...

Some people would say it was a good start, but again, I think we have to wait for more evidence on that line of reasoning to emerge ....

For I don't think Dick Cheney can even spell REFORM, let alone take an action, however laudable it might appear to him, to effect true reform, here in OUR America ....

And regardless of the true reasons the OLD GRIZ blew this REPUBLICAN lawyer away, I think it is a perfect metaphor for the MESS that Dick and George have got this nation in, especially with respect to IRAQINAM ....

JUST DRAW AND SHOOT ....

And then go see what you killed afterwards ....

And so it goes ....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 13 2006, 07:28 AM)
Well ....

The BIG GRIZ sure does have tongues wagging all across OUR America this morning .....

And here I am referring to all the news types on such organs of GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA as FOX NEWS FAIR AND BALANCED, YOU DECIDE .....

Some wags are saying that with the noose tightening around his own neck, now that SCOOTER looks like he might turn "STATE'S EVIDENCE" against the BIG GRIZ here, that Dick is trying to buy his way back into the good graces of the American people as a "REFORMIST" by blowing away not only a lawyer, but a REPUBLICAN lawyer, but I don't know ...

Some people would say it was a good start, but again, I think we have to wait for more evidence on that line of reasoning to emerge ....

For I don't think Dick Cheney can even spell REFORM, let alone take an action, however laudable it might appear to him, to effect true reform, here in OUR America ....

"Senators: Cheney Should Be Probed in Leak"

February 12, 2006

WASHINGTON - Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald should investigate Vice President Dick Cheney and others in the CIA leak probe if they authorized an aide to give secret information to reporters, Democratic and Republican senators said Sunday.

Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., called the leak of intelligence information "inappropriate" if it is true that unnamed "superiors" instructed Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, to divulge the material on Iraq.

Sen. George Allen, R-Va., said a full investigation is necessary.

"I don't think anybody should be releasing classified information, period, whether in the Congress, executive branch or some underling in some bureaucracy," said Allen, who appeared with Reed on "Fox News Sunday."


According to court documents disclosed last week, Libby told a federal grand jury that he disclosed in July 2003 the contents of a classified National Intelligence Estimate as part of the Bush administration's defense of intelligence used to justify invading Iraq.

Fitzgerald said in the documents it was his understanding that "Mr. Libby testified that he was authorized to disclose information about the NIE to the press by his superiors."

The White House has refused to comment on the case.

"I think this calls into question in terms of Fitzgerald's investigation of the conduct of the vice president and others," Reed said.

"I think he has to look closely at their behavior."


Allen expressed confidence in Fitzgerald, whom he called "a very articulate, professional prosecutor."

"And I think the facts will lead wherever they lead, and I think he will prosecute as appropriate," Allen said.

Libby, 55, was indicted on charges that he lied to FBI agents and the grand jury about how he learned CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity and when he told reporters.

He is not charged with leaking classified information.
Snuffysmith
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HB14Ak03.html
SPEAKING FREELY
Freedom dead, democracy dying
By Aseem Shrivastava

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.

"Let us not speak falsely now, the hour is getting late." - Bob Dylan

Imagine: among the recent incidents following the publication of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed was one that went oddly unreported. In Tehran, Iranian police managed to catch a few European teenagers who were throwing glasses and plates at the crowd from the windows of the Danish Consulate when Danish flags were being burned on the street outside.

Later, police took the boys to the nearest station and gave them a thorough thrashing. One of the boys was kicked in his genitals by a policeman, while others held him down. Another was held against the wall and given a sound hammering with batons on his back. A third was kicked by several of them as he lay prostrate on the ground. "Naughty little boys" and various unmentionable abuses were barked at them by the policemen, who were obviously reveling in the sadistic enterprise.

All this was recorded on video by someone and handed over to the television channel that broadcast it this morning.

Back to reality.

Of course, the above story is made up, but not really, because all I did was make the characters involved switch roles, much as in role plays schoolkids are often asked to do in multicultural neighborhoods around Europe, in order to understand where "others are coming from".

The above is precisely what could be seen on TV screens across the world, after the British tabloid News of the World released the video clip of the beating of Iraqi teenage boys carried out by British soldiers some months back.

Let's have, if only for a change, the same rules for everyone.

Let us not fall into the temptation of the old alibi that it was the work of a few bad men in an otherwise decent establishment. In the video there are plenty of soldiers passing by as the beating is going on. None tries to stop it. How many times they must have seen such things, or done them themselves, or seen their superiors do or order them.

When brutalization is banal, it is too boring to talk about, let alone stop.

How many pictures and videos have been banned from the TV screens of the world at the orders of the Pentagon? If there were nothing to hide, we would indeed be living in a free world at the moment.

It won't do to pass the buck downward. Brigadier-General Janis Karpinski, the highest military officer to be punished ("scapegoated", in her own words) in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq (she was demoted to the rank of colonel), in her recent book One Woman's Army says the entire chain of command, starting with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, must be held accountable for the crimes at the prison since the blame "goes all the way to the top". Her interview with Amy Goodman on the news radio Democracy Now! program speaks volumes for the depth of cover-up going on quietly.

The New Standard had reported some months back that a Federal Bureau of Investigation e-mail released by the US government at the demand of the American Civil Liberties Union in December 2004 revealed that President George W Bush had sent out an executive order permitting the use of new interrogation techniques. The White House has neither confirmed nor denied that torture orders were given from the very top.

When the rot is this deep, it is understandable that justice cannot be done: for each finger pointing down at someone who infringed, there will be many times more pointing up toward the bosses who, far from disallowing, actually appear to have encouraged the tortures.

Britain has boasted much about its standards of military justice being some of the highest in the world. Let us see how far up the chain of command investigations are able to reach. Let's see whether the defense secretary is called upon to answer for the crimes.

If we are serious about such matters as peace and security, let us stop denying what is obvious to people living in Muslim countries. Let us not just keep our attention anchored on the silly cartoons and their aftermath on the streets of the Middle East. Let us consider the far graver matters threatening the moral core of civilization itself.

Now the actions last week on the streets of Cairo, Jakarta and Tehran appear in quite a different light. It should have been obvious that the issue - for people living there - did not concern freedom of expression at all. It should have been evident that it wasn't just a matter of a few cartoons. The actions against the cartoons are only at the little-rippling surface of surging anger among people living in Muslim countries at the systematic injustices they continue to suffer at the hands of the West, especially the United States and the United Kingdom. The Muslim clergy is able to make hay only because the blazing sun of foreign injustices refuses to set.

The Abu Ghraib revelations took place almost two years ago - those at the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba even earlier. More recently, it was learned that special Central Intelligence Agency flights were being routed through Europe to carry suspects to be tortured in places where it would be safe to do so. Illegal detentions and tortures continue in a global archipelago of prisons run by Washington.

No significant (by which I mean proportionate) justice has been done with regards to the torture revelations. Muslims, much more so than others, cannot forget that. Nor has there been any promise that the practices would be stopped. On the contrary, Washington has sought to legalize torture.

When one has come to live in such a brutalized global village, when men in suits and ties calmly impose barbarities on others in the name of defending something they call civilization and for passing on the torch of liberty to less fortunate souls in strange lands, the time has come to ask for a clear definition of "civilization".

If you reserve your brutality for bar-room brawls and post-soccer angst, or export it abroad in the shape of oil-seeking military missions masquerading as human-rights campaigns, it does not make you any less barbaric than those Muslims who were openly burning European flags and throwing stones at consulates last week. On the contrary, machines kill more effectively than machetes.

Much deeper things than just freedom of speech are at stake these days. The very dignity of human beings is under the sword - everywhere.

Long before the first atom had been split and the first-ever bomb dropped from the air (by the Italians on Libya in 1911), the great 19th-century American writer Herman Melville had written with self-critical honesty that few in this modern world (which, we are assured, is freer today than ever before) would dare, though the truth is far more grim today:
The fiend-like skill we display in the invention of all manner of death-dealing engines, the vindictiveness with which we carry on our wars, and the misery and desolation that follow in their train, are enough of themselves to distinguish the white civilized man as the most ferocious animal on the face of the earth ... it is needless to multiply the examples of civilized barbarity; they far exceed in the amount of misery they cause the crimes which we regard with such abhorrence in our less enlightened fellow-creature.
Times have moved on much since Melville. But the world is such that the integrity of a white man still has greater impact on human destinies than the honesty of others (who are by no means exempt from their duty to find and tell the truth). One shudders to imagine what Melville would have written today. But the rest of the world expects exactly such honesty from Western citizens today. And we know, from the example of numerous noble exceptions, that they are capable of it. It is for them to terminate their indoctrinated ignorance, seek the truth and make it count.

We are truly scratching the bottom of the barrel of civilization now.

Civilization is not just about good manners, about neat and tidy exteriors that conceal a beastliness that would put animals to shame. At least with the anti-cartoon protests in Islamic countries the barbarities were on the surface, obvious to onlookers. But how do you detect the insane, well-entrenched barbarism of civilized societies if you are only going to be allowed occasional peeks at the scale of organized evil, if the iceberg of dehumanized depravity pops up but once in a while, staying underground long enough to lull us all into the sleep of drugged babies - until the next set of revelations arrive? When dated defensive ideologies of freedom or human rights are used to defend indefensible state actions?

Freedom is dead. Democracy is dying. There are no human rights for those without power. The example of Iraq should teach us that there are things - loss of human dignity, for one, civil war for another - worse than dictatorship.

It is for the citizens of Europe and America to terminate their shameful silence, resume the struggles for freedom, peace and justice that have been in abeyance since the 1960s, and march in their millions on the streets of Western capitals.

Next month we await a show called Death to Iran. If it is allowed to be aired, Westerners will find little left in their pockets after they have paid their rising oil bills.

Beyond that, all bets are off.

Aseem Shrivastava is an independent writer. He can be reached at aseem62@yahoo.com.
Snuffysmith
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts02112006.html

Forget Iran, Americans Should be Hysterical About This
Nuking the Economy
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

Last week the Bureau of Labor Statistics re-benchmarked the payroll jobs data back to 2000. Thanks to Charles McMillion of MBG Information Services, I have the adjusted data from January 2001 through January 2006. If you are worried about terrorists, you don’t know what worry is.

Job growth over the last five years is the weakest on record. The US economy came up more than 7 million jobs short of keeping up with population growth. That’s one good reason for controlling immigration. An economy that cannot keep up with population growth should not be boosting population with heavy rates of legal and illegal immigration.

Over the past five years the US economy experienced a net job loss in goods producing activities. The entire job growth was in service-providing activities--primarily credit intermediation, health care and social assistance, waiters, waitresses and bartenders, and state and local government.

US manufacturing lost 2.9 million jobs, almost 17% of the manufacturing work force. The wipeout is across the board. Not a single manufacturing payroll classification created a single new job.

The declines in some manufacturing sectors have more in common with a country undergoing saturation bombing during war than with a super-economy that is “the envy of the world.” Communications equipment lost 43% of its workforce. Semiconductors and electronic components lost 37% of its workforce. The workforce in computers and electronic products declined 30%. Electrical equipment and appliances lost 25% of its employees. The workforce in motor vehicles and parts declined 12%. Furniture and related products lost 17% of its jobs. Apparel manufacturers lost almost half of the work force. Employment in textile mills declined 43%. Paper and paper products lost one-fifth of its jobs. The work force in plastics and rubber products declined by 15%. Even manufacturers of beverages and tobacco products experienced a 7% shrinkage in jobs.

The knowledge jobs that were supposed to take the place of lost manufacturing jobs in the globalized “new economy” never appeared. The information sector lost 17% of its jobs, with the telecommunications work force declining by 25%. Even wholesale and retail trade lost jobs. Despite massive new accounting burdens imposed by Sarbanes-Oxley, accounting and bookkeeping employment shrank by 4%. Computer systems design and related lost 9% of its jobs. Today there are 209,000 fewer managerial and supervisory jobs than 5 years ago.

In five years the US economy only created 70,000 jobs in architecture and engineering, many of which are clerical. Little wonder engineering enrollments are shrinking. There are no jobs for graduates. The talk about engineering shortages is absolute ignorance. There are several hundred thousand American engineers who are unemployed and have been for years. No student wants a degree that is nothing but a ticket to a soup line. Many engineers have written to me that they cannot even get Wal-Mart jobs because their education makes them over-qualified.

Offshore outsourcing and offshore production have left the US awash with unemployment among the highly educated. The low measured rate of unemployment does not include discouraged workers. Labor arbitrage has made the unemployment rate less and less a meaningful indicator. In the past unemployment resulted mainly from turnover in the labor force and recession. Recoveries pulled people back into jobs.

Unemployment benefits were intended to help people over the down time in the cycle when workers were laid off. Today the unemployment is permanent as entire occupations and industries are wiped out by labor arbitrage as corporations replace their American employees with foreign ones.

Economists who look beyond political press releases estimate the US unemployment rate to be between 7% and 8.5%. There are now hundreds of thousands of Americans who will never recover their investment in their university education.

Unless the BLS is falsifying the data or businesses are reporting the opposite of the facts, the US is experiencing a job depression. Most economists refuse to acknowledge the facts, because they endorsed globalization. It was a win-win situation, they said.

They were wrong.

At a time when America desperately needs the voices of educated people as a counterweight to the disinformation that emanates from the Bush administration and its supporters, economists have discredited themselves. This is especially true for “free market economists” who foolishly assumed that international labor arbitrage was an example of free trade that was benefitting Americans. Where is the benefit when employment in US export industries and import-competitive industries is shrinking? After decades of struggle to regain credibility, free market economics is on the verge of another wipeout.

No sane economist can possibly maintain that a deplorable record of merely 1,054,000 net new private sector jobs over five years is an indication of a healthy economy. The total number of private sector jobs created over the five year period is 500,000 jobs less than one year’s legal and illegal immigration! (In a December 2005 Center for Immigration Studies report based on the Census Bureau’s March 2005 Current Population Survey, Steven Camarota writes that there were 7,9 million new immigrants between January 2000 and March 2005.)

The economics profession has failed America. It touts a meaningless number while joblessness soars. Lazy journalists at the New York Times simply rewrite the Bush administration’s press releases.

On February 10 the Commerce Department released a record US trade deficit in goods and services for 2005--$726 billion. The US deficit in Advanced Technology Products reached a new high. Offshore production for home markets and jobs outsourcing has made the US highly dependent on foreign provided goods and services, while simultaneously reducing the export capability of the US economy. It is possible that there might be no exchange rate at which the US can balance its trade.

Polls indicate that the Bush administration is succeeding in whipping up fear and hysteria about Iran. The secretary of defense is promising Americans decades-long war. Is death in battle Bush’s solution to the job depression? Will Asians finance a decades-long war for a bankrupt country?

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com
Livyjr
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Feb 13 2006, 09:16 AM)
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts02112006.html

"Forget Iran, Americans Should be Hysterical About This
Nuking the Economy"


By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

Polls indicate that the Bush administration is succeeding in whipping up fear and hysteria about Iran.

The secretary of defense is promising Americans decades-long war.

Is death in battle Bush’s solution to the job depression?

Will Asians finance a decades-long war for a bankrupt country?


Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com
*

Somehow, Snuffysmith ....

I believe that that is exactly the case .....

George W. Bush is going to have OUR America as a sort of Hesse, or Brunswick ....

An "ARMY-EXPORTING" nation ....

And someone will finance that .....

For what that will grab them hold of ....

Combine your two articles above and look where it takes you to ....

We are reverting ....

Sliding back ...

For an example of where we are going, try India in the time of Clive ....

Or Afghanistan with its warlords ....

This concept of "state boundaries" is really becoming amorphous ...

And that begins right here in corporate boardrooms in OUR United States of America .....

Where the corporations do not see or respect state boundaries right here in OUR own nation ...

Let alone in the world ...

And so ...

Now you have CORPORATE ARMIES staking out territory ...

Just as the East India Company had its own 100,000 strong private army to do the same in India .....

America is turning into a real ugly place, Snuffysmith ...

A real ugly place, indeed ......

Over in another thread, I talked about quitting the killing in Viet Nam ....

And that is one of the things that I see as having been "changed" ...

Or "altered" in some way ....

With respect to this new ugly America ....

Is that they have "generated" a generation that will kill ...

And that will not question it ...

Because "they" see people like me as the "reason" that we lost in Viet Nam .....

Because we could think ....

We could discern ...

And we could reason ...

And therefore ...

Determine right from wrong ...

And on whose side we were really on ...

THAT WAS SEEN AS WEAKNESS BY THESE NEW CONS ...

And so ....

Through the use of video games and such, they have managed to de-personalize and trivialize human life to the point of where it is worthless ...

And now, they are going to try Viet Nam all over again ..

Believing they can win this time ...

Because no one will question pulling the trigger ....

And there is the folly of Viet Nam compounded all over again ...

Because there will never be enough of the invaders to kill all of the people resisting their invasion, in the end ...

And the more of them that you do manage to kill, what you have really done is to strengthen the survivors, when you believe you are cowing them instead .....

I honestly have never seen such a big a pack of fools as this BUSHCO crowd ....

Nor do I recall such a THUGGISH CORRUPT government here in OUR America in my lifetime, anyway ....

And so ....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 13 2006, 06:47 PM)
I honestly have never seen such a big a pack of fools as this BUSHCO crowd ....

Nor do I recall such a THUGGISH CORRUPT government here in OUR America in my lifetime, anyway ....

And so ....

*

And staying with this same subject for just as moment longer ....

"Cheney Cited for Breaking Hunting Law"

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

49 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney has been given a warning citation for breaking Texas hunting law by failing to buy a $7 stamp allowing him to shoot upland game birds.

The warning came from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department after it investigated Cheney's accidental shooting of a fellow quail hunter Saturday on the private Armstrong Ranch in the south part of the state.

The department found the accident was caused by a "hunter's judgment factor" when Cheney sprayed another hunter while aiming at flying birds.


The report said the victim, prominent Republican attorney Harry Whittington of Austin, was retrieving a downed bird and stepped out of the hunting line he was sharing with Cheney.

"Another covey was flushed and Cheney swung on a bird and fired, striking Whittington in the face, neck and chest at approximately 30 yards," the report said.

Cheney, an experienced hunter, has not commented publicly about the accident.

His office said Monday night in a statement that Cheney had a $125 nonresident hunting license and has sent a $7 check to cover the cost of the stamp.

"The staff asked for all permits needed, but was not informed of the $7 upland game bird stamp requirement," the statement said.

Whittington also received a warning for failing to have the stamp.

A department spokesman said warnings are being issued in most cases because the stamp requirement only went into effect five months ago and many hunters aren't aware of it.

Whittington was in stable condition at Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi-Memorial and was moved from intensive care to a "step-down unit" Monday.

Doctors decided to leave several birdshot pellets lodged in his skin rather than try to remove them.

Katharine Armstrong, owner of the ranch where the shooting occurred, said it happened toward the end of the hunt, when it was still sunny but as darkness was encroaching and they were preparing to go inside.

She said Whittington made a mistake by not announcing that he had walked up to rejoin the hunting line, and Cheney didn't see him as he tried to down a bird.

Armstrong said she saw Cheney's security detail running toward the scene.

"The first thing that crossed my mind was he had a heart problem," she told The Associated Press.

She said Cheney stayed "close but cool" while the agents and medical personnel treated Whittington, then took him by ambulance to the hospital.

Later, the hunting group sat down for dinner while Whittington was being treated, receiving updates from a family member at the hospital.

Armstrong described Cheney's demeanor during dinner as "very worried" about Whittington.

Pamela Willeford, the U.S. ambassador to Switzerland, another member of the hunting party, told The Dallas Morning News for a story in Tuesday's editions that she and Cheney didn't realize Whittington had picked up a bird and caught up with them.

Willeford said she has hunted with Cheney before and would again.

"He's a great shot."

"He's very safety conscious."

"This is something that unfortunately was a bad accident and when you're with a group like that, he's safe or safer than all the rest of us," she said.

The accident raised questions about Cheney's adherence to hunting safety practices and the White House's failure to disclose the accident in a timely way.

Duane Harvey, president of the Wisconsin Hunter Education Instructors Association, said if Whittington had made his presence known "that would have been a polite thing to do."

But, he added, "it's still the fault upon the shooter to identify his target and what is beyond it."


President Bush was told about Cheney's involvement in the accident shortly before 8 p.m. Saturday — about an hour after it occurred — but the White House did not disclose the accident until Sunday afternoon, and then only in response to press questions.

Facing a press corps upset that news had been withheld, press secretary Scott McClellan said, "I think you can always look back at these issues and look at how to do a better job."

Armstrong said she told Cheney on Sunday morning that she was going to inform the local paper, the Corpus Christi Caller-Times.

She said he agreed, and the newspaper was the first to report the incident on its Web site Sunday afternoon.

Secret Service spokesman Eric Zahren said that about an hour after Cheney shot Whittington, the head of the Secret Service's local office called the Kenedy County sheriff to report the accident.

"They made arrangements at the sheriff's request to have deputies come out and interview the vice president the following morning at 8 a.m. and that indeed did happen," Zahren said.

At least one deputy showed up at the ranch's front gate Saturday evening and asked to speak to Cheney but was turned away by the Secret Service, Zahren said.

There was some miscommunication that arrangements already had been made to interview Cheney the next morning, he said.

Gilbert San Miguel, chief deputy sheriff for Kenedy County, said the department's report had not been completed Monday and that it was being handled as a hunting accident, although he would not comment about what exactly they were investigating.

Both the sheriff's department and the state have determined that alcohol did not appear to be a factor.
___

On the Net:

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov

HHHHhhhmmmm ......

"Well, Deputy, yes, we know he shot somebody ..."

"But some punk like you isn't getting in there to talk to him about it ..."

"We'll handle this our own way ..."

Maybe they needed to dry Dick out overnight ...

Or to sedate him ....

In any event, they are saying that since this news came out about Dick Cheney shooting a REPUBLICAN lawyer ...

His popularity in America surged to an all-time new record high of some 96.754987 % ......

And that if he promises to shoot a bunch more, he could be the next president of OUR America by popular acclaim ...

And I guess his website is now being overloaded by people not only here in OUR America, but in the world as well, sending Dick the names of lawyers that they would like him to take hunting with him, the next time he goes ...

And so ...
Livyjr
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Oct 25 2005 @ 03:34 PM)
Funny how a guy can accidentally take a bullet to the TEMPLE.

QUOTE(Livyjr @ Oct 25 2005 @ 05:17 PM)
 
That was a sniper's signature on Calipari, jeffmoskin ....

An assassin's shot ......

The one sure shot to outright kill a man ....

And an expert made it happen .....

No more dealing with the enemies of George W. Bush for Calipari .....

Keep those earflaps down, jeffmoskin ....

QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 14 2006, 07:41 AM)
"Cheney Cited for Breaking Hunting Law"

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

Pamela Willeford, the U.S. ambassador to Switzerland, another member of the hunting party, told The Dallas Morning News for a story in Tuesday's editions that she and Cheney didn't realize Whittington had picked up a bird and caught up with them.

Willeford said she has hunted with Cheney before and would again.

"He's a great shot."

And two and two makes four ...

Or so the wags up here seem to be saying anyway ....

And they would know ...

Or so they would have us believe anyway .....

The wags, that is .....

After all, their crowd runs with people like Dick Cheney .....

And George Pataki, well, he carries water for George W. Bush, himself ...

And so ...

"CALIPARI SYNDROME" is what they are calling it ....

This shooting of this old REPUBLICAN lawyer by Dick Cheney, that is .....

Although no one can say for sure .....

I mean ...

From what they seem to be saying .....

Dick was stroking and carressing his gun quite a bit that day ...

BUT WAS THAT ANYMORE THAN HE NORMALLY WOULD HAVE?

And there seems to be the real conundrum .....

Trying to figure out, at this point, what really would be abberrent behavior in Dick Cheney when he has a gun in his hands .....

Especially in light of this Calipari business that jeffmoskin and I were discussing above ....

That SIGNATURE shot .....

RIGHT TO THE TEMPLE ....

A man's head ....

A speeding car ....

Bigger than the eye on a speeding quail, though ...

And a lot slower, too .....

And a man with the fluid moves of the "Johnny-Texas Throw-Down" such as has Dick Cheney, with that gun in his hands ...

Lightning swift reflexes ...

Combined with a killer's instincts ....

The deadliest of combinations, they say ....

And OUR Dick has it in spades .....

SO ....

Might it be as they say .....

There is Dick, in his mind, looking out ...

And there ....

The road from the airport ...

And the car .....

The car that he had been told about ....

Coming .....

All the time Dick caressing that precision killing machine cradled in his arms ...

And now ...

With the fluid grace of a leopard or panther striking ...

Dick "throws down" .....

The scope automatically falls right on Dick's intended target .....

And .......

ba-BOOM .....

"Hunter Shot by Cheney Has Heart Attack"

By LYNN BREZOSKY and NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writers

14 minutes ago

CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas - The 78-year-old lawyer wounded by Vice President Dick Cheney in a hunting accident suffered a mild heart attack Tuesday after a shotgun pellet in his chest traveled to his heart, hospital officials said.

Harry Whittington was immediately moved back to the intensive care unit and will be watched for a week to make sure more of the metal pellets do not reach other vital organs.

He was reported in stable condition.


Whittington suffered a "silent heart attack" — obstructed blood flow, but without the classic heart-attack symptoms of pain and pressure, according to doctors at Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi-Memorial.

The doctors said they decided to treat the situation conservatively and leave the pellet alone rather than operate to remove it.

They said they are highly optimistic Whittington will recover and live a healthy life with the pellet in him.

Asked whether the pellet could move farther into his heart and become fatal, hospital officials said that was a hypothetical question they could not answer.

Hospital officials said they were not concerned about the six to 200 other pieces of birdshot that might still be lodged in Whittington's body.

Cheney was using 7 1/2 shot from a 28-gauge shotgun.

Shotgun pellets are typically made of steel or lead; the pellets in 7 1/2 shot are just under a tenth of an inch in diameter.

Cheney watched the news conference where doctors described Whittington's complications.

Then the vice president called him, wished him well and asked if there was anything that he needed.

"The vice president said that he stood ready to assist."

"Mr. Whittington's spirits were good, but obviously his situation deserves the careful monitoring that his doctors are providing," the vice president's office said in a statement.

Cheney, an experienced hunter, has not spoken publicly about the accident, which took place Saturday night while the vice president was aiming for a quail.

Critics of the Bush administration called for more answers from the Cheney himself.

Whittington has said through hospital officials that he does not want to comment on the shooting.

A young man at Whittington's Austin home who identified himself as his grandson said Tuesday he did not have time to talk to a reporter and closed the door.

The furor over the accident and the White House delay in making it public are "part of the secretive nature of this administration," said Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.

"I think it's time the American people heard from the vice president."

Before hospital officials announced details of Whittington's condition, the hunting accident had produced a raft of Cheney jokes on late-night television.

"I think Cheney is starting to lose it," Jay Leno said.

"After he shot the guy he screamed, `Anyone else want to call domestic wiretapping illegal?!'"

On Tuesday morning, the White House spokesman briefly joined in the merriment, joking that the orange school colors of the visiting University of Texas championship football team should not be mistaken for hunters' safety gear.

"The orange that they're wearing is not because they're concerned that the vice president may be there," press secretary Scott McClellan said.

"That's why I'm wearing it."


Hospital officials said they knew that Whittington had some birdshot near his heart and that there was a chance it could move closer since scar tissue had not had time to harden and hold the pellet in place.

After Whittington developed an irregular heartbeat, doctors performed a cardiac catheterization, in which a thin, flexible tube is inserted into the heart, to diagnose his condition, said Peter Banko, the administrator at the hospital.

The shot was either touching or embedded in the heart muscle near the top chambers, called the atria, officials said.

Two things resulted:

_It caused inflammation that pushed on the heart in a way to temporarily block blood flow, what the doctors called a "silent heart attack." This is not a traditional heart attack where an artery is blocked. They said Whittington's arteries, in fact, were healthy.

_It irritated the atria, caused an irregular heartbeat known as atrial fibrillation, which is not immediately life-threatening. But it must be treated because it can spur blood clots to form. Most cases can be corrected with medication.

White House physicians helped advise on the course of treatment, hospital officials said.

Texas officials said the shooting was an accident and no charges were brought against the vice president.

A Texas Parks and Wildlife Department report issued Monday said Whittington was retrieving a downed bird and stepped out of the hunting line he was sharing with Cheney.

"Another covey was flushed and Cheney swung on a bird and fired, striking Whittington in the face, neck and chest at approximately 30 yards," the report said.
___

Associated Press Writer Nedra Pickler contributed to this report from Washington.
___

On the Net:

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov





And
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 14 2006, 05:34 PM)
From what they seem to be saying .....

Dick was stroking and carressing his gun quite a bit that day ...

BUT WAS THAT ANYMORE THAN HE NORMALLY WOULD HAVE?

"Late Show with David Letterman," CBS

"Good news, ladies and gentlemen, we have finally located weapons of mass destruction: It's Dick Cheney."

"But here is the sad part -- before the trip Donald Rumsfeld had denied the guy's request for body armor."

"We can't get Bin Laden, but we nailed a 78-year-old attorney."

"The guy who got gunned down, he is a Republican lawyer and a big Republican donor and fortunately the buck shot was deflected by wads of laundered cash."

"So he's fine."

"He took a little in the wallet."

"The Tonight Show with Jay Leno," NBC

"Although it is beautiful here in California, the weather back East has been atrocious."

"There was so much snow in Washington, D.C., Dick Cheney accidentally shot a fat guy thinking it was a polar bear."

"That's the big story over the weekend."

"... Dick Cheney accidentally shot a fellow hunter, a 78-year-old lawyer."

"In fact, when people found out he shot a lawyer, his popularity is now at 92 percent."

"I think Cheney is starting to lose it."

"After he shot the guy he screamed, 'Anyone else want to call domestic wire tapping illegal?'"

"Dick Cheney is capitalizing on this for Valentine's Day."

"It's the new Dick Cheney cologne."

"It's called Duck!"

"The Daily Show with Jon Stewart," Comedy Central

The show's segment titles included "Cheney's Got a Gun," "No. 2 With a Bullet" and "Dead-Eye Dick."

"Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot a man during a quail hunt ... making 78-year-old Harry Whittington the first person shot by a sitting veep since Alexander Hamilton."

"Hamilton, of course, (was) shot in a duel with Aaron Burr over issues of honor, integrity and political maneuvering."

"Whittington?"

"Mistaken for a bird."

"Now, this story certainly has its humorous aspects."

"... But it also raises a serious issue, one which I feel very strongly about."

"... Moms, dads, if you're watching right now, I can't emphasize this enough: Do not let your kids go on hunting trips with the vice president."

"I don't care what kind of lucrative contracts they're trying to land, or energy regulations they're trying to get lifted -- it's just not worth it."

"Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson," CBS

"You can understand why this lawyer fellow let his guard down, because if you're out hunting with a politician, you think, 'If I'm going to get it, it's going to be in the back.'"

"The big scandal apparently is that they didn't release the news for 18 hours."

"I don't think that's a scandal at all."

"I'm quite pleased about that."

"Finally there's a secret the vice president's office can keep."

"Apparently the reason they didn't release the information right away is they said we had to get the facts right."

"That's never stopped them in the past."
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 11 2006, 07:52 AM)
And while we are on the subject of people in OUR America, these poor beleaguered LOW-HANGING FRUITS, as it were, being picked on and singled out for unfair prosecution merely because they are REPUBLICANS ...

And friends of George W. Bush ...

Like Kenny "BOY" Lay, for example ...

Who is certainly being discriminated against because he is one of George W. Bush's friends ....

We have ....


"Three More Lawmakers Linked to Abramoff"

By TONI LOCY and PETE YOST, Associated Press Writers

WASHINGTON - Three members of Congress have been linked to efforts by lobbyist Jack Abramoff and a former General Services Administration official to secure leases of government property for Abramoff's clients, according to court filings by federal prosecutors on Friday.

The filings in U.S. District Court do not allege any wrongdoing by the elected officials but list them in documents portraying David Safavian, a former GSA chief of staff, as an active adviser to Abramoff, giving the lobbyists tips on how to use members of Congress to navigate the agency's bureaucracy.

And while we are on the subject of these poor beleaguered LOW-HANGING FRUITS, as it were, being picked on and singled out for unfair prosecution merely because they are REPUBLICANS ...

And the not-so-low-hanging fruits, as well, it seems .....

We have .....

"Abramoff Said to Claim Close Ties to Rove"

By JOHN SOLOMON and PETE YOST, Associated Press Writers

Tue Feb 14, 2:45 AM ET

WASHINGTON - Three former associates of Jack Abramoff say the now-convicted lobbyist frequently told them he had strong ties to the White House through presidential confidant Karl Rove.

The White House said Monday night that Rove remembers meeting Abramoff at a 1990s political meeting and considered the lobbyist a "casual acquaintance" since President Bush took office in 2001.

New questions have arisen about Abramoff's ties to the White House since a photo emerged over the weekend showing Abramoff with Bush.

The White House would not release the photo or any others that Bush had taken with Abramoff.


Also surfacing were the contents of an e-mail from Abramoff to Washingtonian magazine claiming he had met briefly with the president nearly a dozen times and that Bush knew him well enough to make joking references to Abramoff's family.

Three former business associates of Abramoff, who worked with the lobbyist in various roles between 2001 and 2004, told The Associated Press that Abramoff routinely mentioned Rove when talking about his influence inside the White House.

One said he was present when Abramoff took a call from Rove's office to confirm a White House meeting had been approved between Malaysia's prime minister and Bush in May 2002.

Abramoff was being paid by Malaysia for helping it in Washington, according to evidence the Senate has made public.

All three associates would describe the Abramoff comments only on condition of anonymity, citing the ongoing investigation of Abramoff's work and fears that speaking out could affect their current businesses.

At least one said he had been interviewed by the FBI.

Abramoff was a $100,000 fundraiser for Bush and lobbying records obtained by the AP show his lobbying team logged nearly 200 meetings with the administration during its first 10 months in office on behalf of one of his clients, the Northern Mariana Islands.

The contacts between Abramoff's team and the administration included meetings with Attorney General John Ashcroft and policy advisers to Vice President Dick Cheney, the AP reported last year.


Abramoff's former assistant, Susan Ralston, went to work for Rove in 2001.

Abramoff's legal team declined comment Monday night.

According to one of the three former associates, frequently Abramoff's cell phone would ring and the lobbyist would tell the associate that the White House was calling.

To prove that he wasn't making up what he was telling the associate, Abramoff occasionally would hold up the phone so that the associate could see the incoming call was indeed a White House phone number.


Abramoff has pleaded guilty in a fraud and bribery conspiracy case and is cooperating with the investigation into those in Congress and the administration he used to lobby.

Asked about the three former Abramoff associates' account, the White House said Rove shared a common past with Abramoff as leaders of a young Republicans group decades ago.

"Mr. Rove remembers they had met at a political event in the 1990s," White House spokeswoman Erin Healy said.

"Since then, he would describe him as a casual acquaintance."

Healy said Rove has "no recollection" of talking to Abramoff about the Malaysian prime minister's meeting in May 2002.

She said Bush first met the prime minister at a foreign summit in October 2001 and that the 2002 meeting in the Oval Office was "another opportunity to get together to discuss the war on terror."
Livyjr
And then ....

There is the economy ...

"US retail sales raise interest rate fears"

By Tony Tassell

Tue Feb 14, 1:48 PM ET

Global markets were jolted on Tuesday by much stronger than expected US retail sales data that raised the prospect of further interest rate rises by the Federal Reserve.

Treasuries weakened while Wall Street shares firmed up on news that US retailers saw their biggest monthly sales increase in January since May 2004, as warm weather encouraged shoppers to spend.

The dollar rallied strongly but briefly.

Retail sales rose 2.3 per cent in January, sharply above the average 0.9 per cent increase forecast by economists.

Excluding auto sector sales, the rise was 2.2 per cent, the largest monthly gain for more than six years.

The news added to speculation of a strong recovery in economic growth in the first quarter after a weak fourth quarter last year.

In turn, this was expected to add pressure on Ben Bernanke, the new Fed chairman, to continue to tighten monetary policy.

The central bank has raised its benchmark Fed funds rate 14 times in the current cycle to 4.50 per cent.

A further rise to 4.75 per cent is widely expected at the next meeting of its rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee over March 27 and 28.

Interest rate futures on the Chicago Board of Trade were yesterday indicating expectations of a near 100 per cent probability of another quarter point rise to 5 per cent at FOMC meetings on May 10 or June 28-29.

Mr Bernanke will provide clues on the direction of interest rates when he delivers the Fed's semi-annual monetary policy report to the House Financial Services Committee today and the Senate Banking Committee tomorrow.

Tony Crescenzi, chief bond market strategist at Miller Tabak, described the retail sales figures as a "blowout" that put gross domestic product on track to post a gain of at least 5 per cent for the quarter.

"The data make a strong case for a 5 per cent funds rate, maybe even 5.25 per cent or higher."

"In turn, Treasury yields will follow."

"My credo remains that Treasuries rarely trade below the funds rate except when an interest rate cut is imminent."

"It's not," he said.


Al Goldman, strategist at AG Edwards, forecast that the funds rate would peak at 4.75 per cent.

He said the housing market had cooled and the economy should slow to a 3.2 per cent growth rate this year from 3.5 per cent in 2005.

Mr Goldman added that Mr Bernanke's testimony today was likely to be a "non-event" as it had been widely expected.

By late morning in New York, 10-year yields were 2.1 basis points higher, at 4.604 per cent.

Two-year yields were up 1.3bp at 4.691 per cent.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 1.2 per cent to 11,017.59 while the S&P 500 added 0.8 per cent to 1,273.30 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.8 per cent to 2,257.59.

The dollar initially rallied sharply in the wake of the retail sales data but then slipped.

The dollar reached $1.1856 against the euro before easing to $1.1893, roughly flat on the day.

In Europe, share prices were mixed amid the release of sluggish economic growth figures for the eurozone.

The data were offset by another strong reading of the ZEW Institute's index of investor confidence in Germany.

The FTSE Eurofirst 300 index initially rose to a fresh 4½-year high of 1,338.99, but slipped back to 1,330.80, down 0.2 per cent on the day.

Tokyo continued its volatile run.

The benchmark Nikkei 225 Average gained 1.9 per cent to 16,184.87.

The broader Topix index rose 1.1 per cent to 1,635.24.
jeffmoskin
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 14 2006, 04:42 PM)
Tokyo continued its volatile run.

The benchmark Nikkei 225 Average gained 1.9 per cent to 16,184.87.

The broader Topix index rose 1.1 per cent to 1,635.24.
*

Seems to me that the Nikkei average was around 30,000 during the boom years (80s) before plunging to 10,000 in the 90s.

Anybody remember this?
Snuffysmith
February 15, 2006
Masters of Deception
And now for the real news…
by Justin Raimondo
While the country – or, rather, the American media – is fixated on an accidental shooting by the vice president, and the airwaves are filled with the natterings of the chattering classes over this inconsequential albeit unfortunate matter, the real shooting is being largely ignored: the slaughter continues in Iraq. While reporters and pundits rush to track down every niggling detail of Quailgate, the story of how we were lied into war – and set up for a sequel – is largely untold.

Such is life in the post-9/11 Bizarro World we've all been consigned to: the trivial is spotlighted, while the real news occurs under cover of darkness. Scattered fragments of the story come out, however, and it is left for the inquiring reader – that's you and me, my friend – to fit together such pieces of the puzzle as we have and try to discern some consistent pattern.

The big news is that the Justice Department probe into the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame by Scooter Libby and his cohorts has taken a new and very interesting turn, one that perhaps sheds new light on a key aspect of the case: the motivation of Libby and his co-conspirators. As Raw Story reporter Larisa Alexandrovna reveals in the first really substantive addition to the story since Libby's indictment, Plame's highly sensitive work for the CIA – involving nuclear proliferation issues – had a very specific focus at the time of her outing:

"According to current and former intelligence officials, Plame Wilson, who worked on the clandestine side of the CIA in the Directorate of Operations as a non-official cover (NOC) officer, was part of an operation tracking distribution and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction technology to and from Iran.

"Speaking under strict confidentiality, intelligence officials revealed heretofore unreported elements of Plame's work. Their accounts suggest that Plame's outing was more serious than has previously been reported and carries grave implications for U.S. national security and its ability to monitor Iran's burgeoning nuclear program."

The exposure of Plame and her entire operation – Brewster Jennings & Associates, the CIA front company that cloaked this super-secret tracking program – effectively blinded the U.S. to the evolution of Iran's nuclear program. Not long after the outing of Plame – and just after a grand jury began hearing testimony in the Fitzgerald investigation – another security breach involving Iran made headlines: the Iranians had been alerted to the fact that the U.S. had broken the code governing their internal government communications, with the chief suspects being the neoconservative version of Che Guevara, Ahmed Chalabi, and his Iraqi National Congress, the source of much of the phony pre-invasion "intelligence" about Iraq. The truth about Iran's WMD (or lack of same) was rendered inaccessible, leaving the field open for the neocons and their foreign operatives to move into the vacuum and keep their very effective lie factory working overtime.

At the same time, the chief analyst at the Pentagon's Iran desk, Larry Franklin, a committed neoconservative, was making contact with two officials of the American Israel Political Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the heavy-hitting Washington lobby, feeding them information that they subsequently passed on to Israeli embassy officials, including Naor Gilon, the embassy's chief of political affairs, and another yet-to-be-named official (who some speculate may be Danny Ayalon, Israel's ambassador to the U.S.). The focus of the Franklin-AIPAC spy cabal: U.S. intelligence on Iran.

And that's not all. More interesting reportage by Alexandrovna points to a third prong of this disabling operation aimed at U.S. surveillance of Iran:

"Several U.S. and foreign intelligence sources, along with investigators, say an Iranian exile with ties to Iran-Contra peddled a bizarre tale of stolen uranium to governments on both sides of the Atlantic in the spring and summer of 2003.

"The story that was peddled – which detailed how an Iranian intelligence team infiltrated Iraq prior to the start of the war in March of 2003, and stole enriched uranium to use in their own nuclear weapons program – was part of an attempt to implicate both countries in a WMD plot."

A familiar cast of characters stars in this tale of intrigue and disinformation: Manucher Ghorbanifar, the Iranian arms merchant and master of deception, who, along with neoconservative guru Michael Ledeen – another player in this drama – was entangled in the Iran-Contra affair. Larry Franklin makes a guest appearance at a meeting in Rome where the plot was reportedly hatched. Oh, and a mysterious Iranian named "Ali," who, it turns out, is the pseudonym for Fereidoun Mahdavi, a former minister under the Shah, now a secretary to Ghorbanifar.

It would have been Plame's job to debunk Ali's tall tales. Knocking her and Brewster Jennings out of the running was necessarily a top priority for those with an interest in targeting Iran. There is a lot more here than has come to the attention of the "mainstream" media, and, again, Alexandrovna is digging where others fear to tread.

All indications are that an active campaign to set up Iran for attack was going full gear even as George W. Bush was declaring "mission accomplished" in Iraq. As we look at the different pieces of the puzzle, a definite picture begins to emerge: what we are seeing are the outlines of a coordinated covert action, engineered by neoconservative ideologues in and around the Pentagon and Dick Cheney's office, and carried out in cooperation with the Israelis. Their objective: gin up a war with Iran, even as we marched into Iraq. A one-two punch that will speed the forces of "democratization" and visit upon the region what Ledeen lauds as "creative destruction."

It is commonly assumed that the outing of Plame was retaliation for her husband's vocal opposition to the war and his debunking of the myth that Saddam sought uranium in the African nation of Niger with which to make a nuclear bomb. Yet this explanation was never really very satisfactory: it assumed an extraordinary amount of self-indulgent pettiness on the part of the leakers in the White House, and a level of vindictiveness bordering on stupidity.

As we begin to understand the nature of Plame's work, her exposure takes on new significance: the War Party was intent on blindfolding U.S. policymakers by ensuring that no one with any expertise or interest in debunking their lies would remain standing. Spared the sight of reality – which is that Iran is at least 10 years away from building a viable nuclear weapon – U.S. officials would then be free to do what they did in the case of Iraq: make it up as they go along.

Libby has already been indicted, but others, as we have seen, are knee-deep in this quagmire. As the investigation deepens and broadens, and the trial date (a year from now) approaches, the twists and turns of the scandal – which ought to go down in history as Neocongate – will be mapped by the meticulous Fitzgerald, as the story of how we were lied into war is laid bare.
Livyjr
QUOTE(jeffmoskin @ Feb 14 2006, 07:23 PM)
Seems to me that the Nikkei average was around 30,000 during the boom years (80s) before plunging to 10,000 in the 90s.

Anybody remember this?

*

Yes, I believe that I do, jeffmoskin ....

Which is why I like to watch these numbers ...

And especially listen to all the hype ...

From the HYPESTERS ....

Who get paid all those big bucks to feed us with this hype ....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Feb 15 2006, 05:53 AM)
February 15, 2006 

Masters of Deception - And now for the real news…
 
by Justin Raimondo

While the country – or, rather, the American media – is fixated on an accidental shooting by the vice president, and the airwaves are filled with the natterings of the chattering classes over this inconsequential albeit unfortunate matter, the real shooting is being largely ignored: the slaughter continues in Iraq.

Good morning, Snuffysmith .....

And thanks for your contribution in here this morning ....

When I read his opening lines, I have to wonder how old this Justin Raimondo really is ....

For he comes across as young and idealistic to me ...

AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH EITHER, believe me ....

It is just that when you are young, and this is not a universal law, or anything, I don't think that one can really appreciate such concepts as "inertia", "inertness", and just plain "total numbness" when it comes to a continuing stream of bad news, as is the case with IRAQINAM and all the lies that have been told to us by this administration since the first day they came into power here in OUR America in the year 2000 .....

I do some two and two, Snuffysmith, and I surmise by that, that you must have been around in some capacity during the Viet Nam times ....

And so ...

Whatever your own thoughts on those times might have been, the fact is ...

That you were there ..

As was jeffmoskin ...

And although I have a hole in my own record, having been out of the country in 1969 while in Viet Nam, it seems to me that people reacted the same way back then ....

It's like eating nothing but hot dogs morning, noon and night ....

At some point, it's just hard to stomach another ...

And so it is with this news .....

We, of course, are an experiment in here ..

In that people like me have no "background" at this ....

And there is no real "history" for this type of forum ...

Since the internet is still new enough ....

And so ...

Between us, we stick things up on the wall in here ...

And then we see what happens ....

And somehow, in here, in Life in OUR America, we have managed to survive into a fifth volume .....

And rarely does IRAQINAM show up in here these days ....

Not because I won't "get onto" that subject ....

But because there is not a lot in the "press" when I do my scans for news ....

And it is the same old YADA day after day after day ....

Death and destruction ...

Destruction and death ....

Over and over and over ...

Incompetence, ineptness and LIES on the part of George W. Bush and his ...

And death and destruction ...

Destruction and death ...

YADA, YADA, YADA, YADA, YADA ..............................

AND WE HAVE NO CONTROL ...

No knob ...

No lever ...

No dial ...

We cannot turn it off ..

We cannot stop the madness ..

SO ...

We "shut it off", instead .....

As a means of self-protection ...

And self-preservation .....

I know up here where I am that there are still divisions and hostilities between the populace as a result of this IRAQINAM war, and those divisions and hostilities preclude meaningful dialogue on this war ...

Just as was the case with Viet Nam ....

And again, back then, it seemed that we were powerless, too ...

And so ..

We look for something else to talk about ...

Like Dick Cheney ....

Because it lightens up the mood, if nothing else ....

And Justin needs to consider these things, so that he can make his method of presentation adapt with his audience ...

And here, I am not claiming to be the GREAT COMMUNICATOR, at all ....

I just know that I have limits of endurance, myself, to what I can really bear to hear in one day ....

And so ....

I try to keep myself below that limit in here ...

And I try and avoid my own tendency to want to ask people why they cannot see what is going on ....

Because I have learned over time that that is just the way it is ...

We see what we see ...

When we see it ...

But perhaps more importantly to Justin ...

There are times when we just turn right off ..

And so ...

That is not a commentary on Justin, so much as it is a reflection on human nature, and what I have experienced of it in my limited time down here on this earth of ours ..

And so ...
Livyjr
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Feb 15 2006, 05:53 AM)
February 15, 2006 

"Masters of Deception - And now for the real news …" 
by Justin Raimondo

It is commonly assumed that the outing of Plame was retaliation for her husband's vocal opposition to the war and his debunking of the myth that Saddam sought uranium in the African nation of Niger with which to make a nuclear bomb.

Yet this explanation was never really very satisfactory: it assumed an extraordinary amount of self-indulgent pettiness on the part of the leakers in the White House, and a level of vindictiveness bordering on stupidity.

As we begin to understand the nature of Plame's work, her exposure takes on new significance: the War Party was intent on blindfolding U.S. policymakers by ensuring that no one with any expertise or interest in debunking their lies would remain standing.

Spared the sight of reality – which is that Iran is at least 10 years away from building a viable nuclear weapon – U.S. officials would then be free to do what they did in the case of Iraq: make it up as they go along.

Now, Snuffysmith ...

With my above said .....

And out of the way ....

It is clear that Justin does have something to offer here ...

And it should be heard ...

Even though in a lot of ways ...

It just serves to stuff our helplessness and impotence as American citizens further down our throats ....

We have been toyed with here in OUR America ...

Played with ....

We have had our emotions tweaked ....

We have had our heads packed tight with a mountain of lies ....

And twaddle ....

And outright plain old TEXAS BULL**** .....

And we have been told that our neighbor down the road WILL INVITE TAY-RISTS to sit with him and his at their Sunday main meal ....

If they are not for George W. Bush ...

Who is the ONLY person on the whole face of this earth who is both alert enough to recognize this EXTREME DANGER OUR OWN NEIGHBORS REPRESENT TO US, and RESOLUTE ENOUGH to stop this threat, by blowing up a lot of the world, and by killing off a lot of people, and by suspending due process of law so that George W. Bush can jail OUR neighbors, for our national security, of course ...

And America sucks that pablum up, right through a straw, as though it were the very gospel truth, itself ....

I could say that these are strange times in which we live ...

But my continuing study of history has kind of convinced me that ALL times are strange ....

And about all that really does change is the date on the calendar .....

And maybe men's hair styles ...

And facial hair, of course ....

Whether the scruffy Brad Pitt, "GEE, MOMMY, I WAS TOO TUCKERED OUT TO SHAVE THIS MORNING" type of look is in or out today ....

And that is about it .....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 15 2006, 08:00 AM)
We have been toyed with here in OUR America ...

Played with ....

We have had our emotions tweaked ....

We have had our heads packed tight with a mountain of lies ....

And twaddle ....

And outright plain old TEXAS BULL**** .....

"Lawyers Group Says Bush Exceeds His Powers"

By ANNA JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer

13 February 2006

CHICAGO - The American Bar Association denounced President Bush's warrantless domestic surveillance program Monday, accusing him of exceeding his powers under the Constitution.

The program has prompted a heated debate about presidential powers in the war on terror since it was disclosed in December.

The nation's largest organization of lawyers adopted a policy opposing any future government use of electronic surveillance in the United States for foreign intelligence purposes without first obtaining warrants from a special court set up under the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The 400,000-member ABA said that if the president believes the FISA is inadequate to protect Americans, he should to ask Congress to amend the act.

Bush and his administration have defended the warrantless eavesdropping, saying it is needed to fill a gap in U.S. security and is allowable under both the president's constitutional powers and the congressional measure authorizing him to go to war in September 2001.

The ABA has urged Congress to affirm that when it authorized Bush to go to war, it did not intend to endorse warrantless spying.
Snuffysmith
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 15 2006, 02:31 PM)
Good morning, Snuffysmith .....

And thanks for your contribution in here this morning ....

When I read his opening lines, I have to wonder how old this Justin Raimondo really is ....

For he comes across as young and idealistic to me ...

AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH EITHER, believe me ....

It is just that when you are young, and this is not a universal law, or anything, I don't think that one can really appreciate such concepts as "inertia", "inertness", and just plain "total numbness" when it comes to a continuing stream of bad news, as is the case with IRAQINAM and all the lies that have been told to us by this administration since the first day they came into power here in OUR America in the year 2000 .....

I do some two and two, Snuffysmith, and I surmise by that, that you must have been around in some capacity during the Viet Nam times ....

And so ...

Whatever your own thoughts on those times might have been, the fact is ...

That you were there ..

As was jeffmoskin ...

And although I have a hole in my own record, having been out of the country in 1969 while in Viet Nam, it seems to me that people reacted the same way back then ....

It's like eating nothing but hot dogs morning, noon and night ....

At some point, it's just hard to stomach another ...

And so it is with this news .....

We, of course, are an experiment in here ..

In that people like me have no "background" at this ....

And there is no real "history" for this type of forum ...

Since the internet is still new enough ....

And so ...

Between us, we stick things up on the wall in here ...

And then we see what happens ....

And somehow, in here, in Life in OUR America, we have managed to survive into a fifth volume .....

And rarely does IRAQINAM show up in here these days ....

Not because I won't "get onto" that subject ....

But because there is not a lot in the "press" when I do my scans for news ....

And it is the same old YADA day after day after day ....

Death and destruction ...

Destruction and death ....

Over and over and over ...

Incompetence, ineptness and LIES on the part of George W. Bush and his ...

And death and destruction ...

Destruction and death ...

YADA, YADA, YADA, YADA, YADA ..............................

AND WE HAVE NO CONTROL ...

No knob ...

No lever ...

No dial ...

We cannot turn it off ..

We cannot stop the madness ..

SO ...

We "shut it off", instead .....

As a means of self-protection ...

And self-preservation .....

I know up here where I am that there are still divisions and hostilities between the populace as a result of this IRAQINAM war, and those divisions and hostilities preclude meaningful dialogue on this war ...

Just as was the case with Viet Nam ....

And again, back then, it seemed that we were powerless, too ...

And so ..

We look for something else to talk about ...

Like Dick Cheney ....

Because it lightens up the mood, if nothing else ....

And Justin needs to consider these things, so that he can make his method of presentation adapt with his audience ...

And here, I am not claiming to be the GREAT COMMUNICATOR, at all ....

I just know that I have limits of endurance, myself, to what I can really bear to hear in one day ....

And so ....

I try to keep myself below that limit in here ...

And I try and avoid my own tendency to want to ask people why they cannot see what is going on ....

Because I have learned over time that that is just the way it is ...

We see what we see ...

When we see it ...

But perhaps more importantly to Justin ...

There are times when we just turn right off ..

And so ...

That is not a commentary on Justin, so much as it is a reflection on human nature, and what I have experienced of it in my limited time down here on this earth of ours ..

And so ...
*



I'd say Raimondo is in his late 40s.And that puts me about 10 years older than him. And I was around during the Vietnam era as were most of my friends, colleagues, and associates. And because we were young then, it left impressions and scars for the rest of our lives. and like victims of child abuse, some of us go back for more. Unfortunately. I don't eat hotdogs.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Feb 15 2006, 11:47 AM)
I'd say Raimondo is in his late 40s.

And that puts me about 10 years older than him.

And I was around during the Vietnam era as were most of my friends, colleagues, and associates.

And because we were young then, it left impressions and scars for the rest of our lives.

And like victims of child abuse, some of us go back for more.

Unfortunately.

I don't eat hotdogs.

*

And as a Viet Nam veteran, Snuffysmith, I would say that you just said a mouthful ....

And it is a mouthful that never gets considered ....

Which is what young people like yourself thought about the sanity of the older generation around them during the Viet Nam war times .....

I have said that I have a hole in my record back then, and I do ....

When I was in Viet Nam, I had no news of what was going on over here ...

Or in the world, for that matter ....

And so ....

To this day, when people talk about what went on over here during that time ....

I just have to stand there nodding my head like some bobble-headed geek ....

Because I haven't the slightest idea what they are talking about ....

And I have no real good way to fill in the blanks ...

And so ....

As to someone your age at that time, there would have been no chance that I would have an idea of what it was like back here for you ...

And similarly, I would have no way to fill in those blanks ....

And history never bothered to record your thoughts ...

Or to even consider that they mattered ...

And so ...
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 14 2006, 05:34 PM)
And two and two makes four ...

Or so the wags up here seem to be saying anyway ....

And they would know ...

Or so they would have us believe anyway .....

The wags, that is .....

After all, their crowd runs with people like Dick Cheney .....

And George Pataki, well, he carries water for George W. Bush, himself ...

And so ...

"CALIPARI SYNDROME" is what they are calling it ....

This shooting of this old REPUBLICAN lawyer by Dick Cheney, that is .....

Although no one can say for sure .....

I mean ...

From what they seem to be saying .....

Dick was stroking and carressing his gun quite a bit that day ...

BUT WAS THAT ANYMORE THAN HE NORMALLY WOULD HAVE?

And there seems to be the real conundrum .....

Trying to figure out, at this point, what really would be abberrent behavior in Dick Cheney when he has a gun in his hands .....

Especially in light of this Calipari business that jeffmoskin and I were discussing above ....

That SIGNATURE shot .....

RIGHT TO THE TEMPLE ....

A man's head ....

A speeding car ....

Bigger than the eye on a speeding quail, though ...

And a lot slower, too .....

And a man with the fluid moves of the "Johnny-Texas Throw-Down" such as has Dick Cheney, with that gun in his hands ...

Lightning swift reflexes ...

Combined with a killer's instincts ....

The deadliest of combinations, they say ....

And OUR Dick has it in spades .....

SO ....

Might it be as they say .....

There is Dick, in his mind, looking out ...

And there ....

The road from the airport ...

And the car .....

The car that he had been told about ....

Coming .....

All the time Dick caressing that precision killing machine cradled in his arms ...

And now ...

With the fluid grace of a leopard or panther striking ...

Dick "throws down" .....

The scope automatically falls right on Dick's intended target .....

And .......

ba-BOOM
.....

And winging our way back forward in time from the Viet Nam times to this BIZARRO-WORLD that has replaced those Viet Nam times, now that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have become ascendent here in OUR America ....

We have what looks like Dick Cheney going through some kind of epiphany here ......

Or a soul-cleansing, perhaps ...

Or an expiation, as some wags are calling it .....

Whatever, the BIG GRIZ is stepping right up to the plate and he is saying to all the candid world, that yes, he did blow the old lawyer away ..

And is there somebody who wants to do a thing about it?

If so, BRANG UM ON ....

"Cheney Breaks Silence on Hunting Accident"

By NEDRA PICKLER and LYNN BREZOSKY, Associated Press Writers

2 hours, 25 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday accepted full blame for shooting a fellow hunter and defended his decision to not publicly disclose the accident until the following day.

He called it "one of the worst days of my life."

"I'm the guy who pulled the trigger that fired the round that hit Harry," Cheney told Fox News Channel in his first public comments since the shooting Saturday in south Texas.

Cheney described seeing 78-year-old Harry Whittington fall to the ground after he pulled the trigger while aiming at a covey of quail.

"The image of him falling is something I'll never ever be able to get out of my mind," Cheney said.

"I fired, and there's Harry falling."

"It was, I'd have to say, one of the worst days of my life at that moment."

Cheney has been under intense political pressure to speak out about the shooting incident, which has become a public relations embarrassment and potential political liability for the White House.

Until Wednesday, Cheney had refused to comment on why he withheld information about the shooting, which prolonged the controversy and made him the butt of jokes.

Cheney was soft-spoken and somber during the interview with Fox's Brit Hume.

"You can talk about all of the other conditions that exist at the time but that's the bottom line and — it was not Harry's fault," he said.

"You can't blame anybody else."

"I'm the guy who pulled the trigger and shot my friend."

Cheney said he had had a beer at lunch that day, but nobody was drinking when they went back out to hunt several hours later.

Texas officials said the shooting was an accident, and no charges have been brought against the vice president.

A report that the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department issued Monday said Whittington was retrieving a downed bird and stepped out of the hunting line he was sharing with Cheney.

"Another covey was flushed and Cheney swung on a bird and fired, striking Whittington in the face, neck and chest at approximately 30 yards," the report said.

"I ran over to him," Cheney said.

"He was laying there on his back, obviously, bleeding."

"You could see where the shot struck him."

He said he has no idea if he hit a bird because he was focused on Whittington.

"I said, `Harry, I had no idea you were there.'"

"He didn't respond," Cheney said.

Whittington was reported doing well at a Texas hospital Wednesday, a day after doctors said that a pellet entered his heart and he had what they called "a mild heart attack."

Hospital officials said the Texan, though still listed in intensive care, had a normal heart rhythm again Wednesday afternoon and was sitting up in a chair, eating and planning to do some legal work in his room.

Cheney has been roundly criticized for failing to tell the public about the accident until the next day.

He said he thought it made sense to let the owner of the ranch where it happened reveal the accident on the local newspaper's Web site Sunday morning.

"I thought that was the right call," Cheney said.

"I still do."

Cheney said he agreed that ranch owner Katharine Armstrong should make the story public, because she was an eyewitness, because she grew up on the ranch and because she is "an acknowledged expert in all of this" as a past head of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.

He also agreed with her decision to choose the local newspaper as the way to get the news out.

"I thought that made good sense because you can get as accurate a story as possible from somebody who knew and understood hunting and then it would immediately go up to the wires and be posted on the Web site, which is the way it went out and I thought that was the right call," Cheney said.

"What do you think now?" he was asked.

"I still do," Cheney responded.

"The accuracy was enormously important."

"I had no press person with me."


Armstrong told reporters that Whittington made a mistake by not announcing himself as he returned to the hunting line after breaking off to retrieve a downed bird.

But Cheney, an avid and longtime hunter, said Whittington was not to blame.

Through hospital officials, Whittington has declined to comment.

"He still kind of wonders what all the hoopla is about," said Peter Banko, administrator of Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi-Memorial.

Cheney was using No. 7 1/2 shot from a 28-gauge shotgun.

Shotgun pellets typically are made of steel or lead; the pellets in No. 7 1/2 shot are just under one-tenth of an inch in diameter.

The pellet that traveled to Whittington's heart was either touching or embedded in the heart muscle near the top chambers, called the atria, officials said.
___

Lynn Brezosky contributed to this report from Corpus Christi.
___

On the Net:

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 15 2006, 06:18 PM)
"Cheney Breaks Silence on Hunting Accident"

By NEDRA PICKLER and LYNN BREZOSKY, Associated Press Writers

WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday accepted full blame for shooting a fellow hunter and defended his decision to not publicly disclose the accident until the following day.

Cheney said he agreed that ranch owner Katharine Armstrong should make the story public, because she was an eyewitness, because she grew up on the ranch and because she is "an acknowledged expert in all of this" as a past head of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.

He also agreed with her decision to choose the local newspaper as the way to get the news out.

"I thought that made good sense because you can get as accurate a story as possible from somebody who knew and understood hunting and then it would immediately go up to the wires and be posted on the Web site, which is the way it went out and I thought that was the right call," Cheney said.

"What do you think now?" he was asked.

"I still do," Cheney responded.

"The accuracy was enormously important."

"I had no press person with me."

February 12, 2006

Breaking News

"CHENEY SAYS SHOOTING OF FELLOW HUNTER WAS BASED ON FAULTY INTELLIGENCE - Believed Shooting Victim Was Zawahiri, Veep Says"

Vice President Dick Cheney revealed today that he shot a fellow hunter while on a quail hunting trip over the weekend because he believed the man was the fugitive terror mastermind Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Mr. Cheney acknowledged that the man he sprayed with pellets on Saturday was not al-Zawahiri but rather Harry Whittington, a 78-year-old millionaire lawyer from Austin, blaming the mix-up on "faulty intelligence."

"I believed I had credible intelligence that al-Zawahiri had infiltrated my hunting party in disguise with the intent of spraying me with pellets," Mr. Cheney told reporters.

"Only after I shot Harry in the face and he shouted 'Cheney, you bastard' did I realize that this intelligence was faulty."

Moments after Mr. Cheney's assault on Mr. Whittington, Mr. al-Zawahiri appeared in a new videotape broadcast on al-Jazeera to announce that he was uninjured in the vice president's attack because, in his words, "I was in Pakistan."

An aide to the vice president said he believed that the American people would believe Mr. Cheney's version of events, but added, "If he was going to shoot any of his cronies right now it's a shame it wasn't Jack Abramoff."

At the White House, President George W. Bush defended his vice president's shooting of a fellow hunter, saying that the attack sent "a strong message to terrorists everywhere."

"The message is, if Dick Cheney is willing to shoot an innocent American citizen at point-blank range, imagine what he'll do to you," Mr. Bush said.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 15 2006, 06:43 PM)
February 12, 2006

Breaking News

"CHENEY SAYS SHOOTING OF FELLOW HUNTER WAS BASED ON FAULTY INTELLIGENCE - Believed Shooting Victim Was Zawahiri, Veep Says"

Vice President Dick Cheney revealed today that he shot a fellow hunter while on a quail hunting trip over the weekend because he believed the man was the fugitive terror mastermind Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Mr. Cheney acknowledged that the man he sprayed with pellets on Saturday was not al-Zawahiri but rather Harry Whittington, a 78-year-old millionaire lawyer from Austin, blaming the mix-up on "faulty intelligence."

Moments after Mr. Cheney's assault on Mr. Whittington, Mr. al-Zawahiri appeared in a new videotape broadcast on al-Jazeera to announce that he was uninjured in the vice president's attack because, in his words, "I was in Pakistan."

An aide to the vice president said he believed that the American people would believe Mr. Cheney's version of events, but added, "If he was going to shoot any of his cronies right now it's a shame it wasn't Jack Abramoff."

At the White House, President George W. Bush defended his vice president's shooting of a fellow hunter, saying that the attack sent "a strong message to terrorists everywhere."

"The message is, if Dick Cheney is willing to shoot an innocent American citizen at point-blank range, imagine what he'll do to you," Mr. Bush said.

*

And from the internet ....

We have some forensic analysis of this incident that has all of OUR America and the world talking .....

Did Dick Cheney just "throw down" on poor Harry, as some are saying, because he caught a glimpse of old Harry coming after him with a raised gun out of the corner of his eye, and his lightning quick reflexes just took over .....

Or is it as some others are saying, that with a natural-born predator such as the BIG GRIZ is, you just never know when they are going to turn .....

That the glue that holds the veneer of civilization onto the BIG GRIZ has become "tired" with age ....

OR ....

Could it be something else, entirely ....

Let us look and see as Comedy Central's Rob Corddry, playing the role of a "vice president firearms mishap analyst," explained it all Monday night for "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart:

Stewart: Rob, obviously a very unfortunate situation.

How is the vice president handling it?

Corddry: Jon, tonight the vice president is standing by his decision to shoot Harry Whittington.

According to the best intelligence available, there were quail hidden in the brush.

Everyone believed at the time there were quail in the brush.

And while the quail turned out to be a 78-year-old man, even knowing that today, Mr. Cheney insists he still would have shot Mr. Whittington in the face.

He believes the world is a better place for his spreading buckshot throughout the entire region of Mr. Whittington's face.

Stewart: But why, Rob?

If he had known Mr. Whittington was not a bird, why would he still have shot him?

Corddry: Jon, in a post-9/11 world, the American people expect their leaders to be decisive.

To not have shot his friend in the face would have sent a message to the quail that America is weak.

Stewart: That's horrible.

Corddry: Look, the mere fact that we're even talking about how the vice president drives up with his rich friends in cars to shoot farm-raised wingless quail-tards is letting the quail know "how" we're hunting them.

I'm sure right now those birds are laughing at us in that little "covey" of theirs.

Stewart: I'm not sure birds can laugh, Rob.

Corddry: Well, whatever it is they do -- coo -- they're cooing at us right now, Jon, because here we are talking openly about our plans to hunt them.

Jig is up.

Quails one, America zero.

end quotes

And with this seemingly whacked-out BUSHCO crowd that is rampant in OUR America right now, I bet this is about as close to the truth as any of these stories on this shooting of this lawyer by Dick Cheney will be ....
Snuffysmith
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 15 2006, 11:55 PM)
And as a Viet Nam veteran, Snuffysmith, I would say that you just said a mouthful ....

And it is a mouthful that never gets considered ....

Which is what young people like yourself thought about the sanity of the older generation around them during the Viet Nam war times .....

I have said that I have a hole in my record back then, and I do ....

When I was in Viet Nam, I had no news of what was going on over here ...

Or in the world, for that matter ....

And so ....

To this day, when people talk about what went on over here during that time ....

I just have to stand there nodding my head like some bobble-headed geek ....

Because I haven't the slightest idea what they are talking about ....

And I have no real good way to fill in the blanks ...

And so ....

As to someone your age at that time, there would have been no chance that I would have an idea of what it was like back here for you ...

And similarly, I would have no way to fill in those blanks ....

And history never bothered to record your thoughts ...

Or to even consider that they mattered ...

And so ...
*



It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance. Robert F. Kennedy
US Attorney General 1961-64, assassinated in Los Angeles while campaigning, 1968.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Feb 15 2006, 10:28 PM)
"It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped ....."

"Each time a man stands up for an ideal ...."

"Or acts to improve the lot of others ....

"Or strikes out against injustice ...."

"He sends forth a tiny ripple of hope ..."

"And crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring ..."

"Those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."


- Robert F. Kennedy, US Attorney General 1961-64, assassinated in Los Angeles while campaigning, 1968.
*

Well, Snuffysmith ....

There it is ...

There it is ...

Which is why each day, we make the long trek into here ...

And power up the transmitter one more time ....

To traverse the hazards and perils of uncharted cyber-space, winging our way ever further into the trackless bounds of the BLOG-O-SPHERE ....

Because of these words above ..

And not because they were said by Bobby Kennedy ...

But because they were true before he ever put voice to them ...

And long after we are gone, they will remain true as well ...

And so ..

In our own time, we should be true to them, in return ....

Is my thought, anyway ....

Onwards ...

Upwards ..

Towards the splendid shining city we go ...
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 15 2006, 06:59 PM)
Did Dick Cheney just "throw down" on poor Harry, as some are saying, because he caught a glimpse of old Harry coming after him with a raised gun out of the corner of his eye, and his lightning quick "BORN KILLER'S" reflexes just took over .....

Or is it as some others are saying, that with a natural-born carnivorous predator such as the BIG GRIZ is, you just never know when they are going to turn .....

That the glue that holds the veneer of civilization onto the BIG GRIZ has become "tired" with age ....

Yes, indeed ...

You do hear it said from time to time that these big, predatory carnivores like Dick Cheney, the "BIG WYOMING GRIZ", that they can be tamed ...

Domesticated ...

As though they were just some big dog or something ....

And some people do appear able to tame them ...

To have wild animals like wolves and grizzly bears around them ...

Even living with them in houses and such ....

But the question always does remain ...

Are they really tame?

Might they turn?

And no one, absolutely no one ...

Ever quite knows for sure ....

"Cheney expresses remorse, DEFIANCE - Speaking on shooting, vice president accepts blame, rejects critics"

By PETER BAKER, Washington Post
First published: Thursday, February 16, 2006

WASHINGTON -- Vice President Dick Cheney accepted full responsibility Wednesday for shooting a 78-year-old lawyer during a hunting accident in Texas last weekend, calling it "one of the worst days of my life," but he no regret about waiting until the next day to reveal the incident to the public.

Breaking his silence four days after the shooting, a subdued Cheney recounted the incident in stark and personal terms, saying he was haunted by the memory of his friend, Harry Whittington, falling to the ground.

While Cheney allies have faulted Whittington for not signaling fellow hunters that he was nearby, the vice president said the blame belongs to him.

"Ultimately, I'm the guy who pulled the trigger and fired the round that hit Harry," Cheney said in a hastily arranged White House interview with the Fox News Channel -- which Democrats maintain has a pro-Bush bias.

"It was not Harry's fault."

"You can't blame anybody else."

"I'm the guy who pulled the trigger and shot my friend."

"And I say that is something I'll never forget."

The vice president rejected critics, including Republicans, who said the incident should have been announced promptly by the White House, rather than by the ranch owner calling a local reporter the next day.

"I thought that made good sense because you get as accurate a story as possible from somebody who knew and understood hunting," he said, adding, "And I thought that was the right call."

"... I still do."

Cheney, however, agreed to discuss the accident publicly only after the White House signaled that President Bush wished that Cheney had made the news public more quickly.


According to The New York Times, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said that when he said, as he first did on Monday, that "you can always look back at these issues and work to do better," he had been "speaking on behalf of the White House and the President."

The interview came as Whittington's condition was upgraded at Christus Spohn Hospital in Corpus Christi, Texas, where a birdshot pellet was discovered to have moved to his heart and doctors performed a cardiac catheterization Tuesday.

Whittington was in stable condition Wednesday and being kept in intensive care only to guard his privacy, hospital officials said.

"He's doing extremely well," said Peter Banko, a hospital vice president, who estimated that Whittington would remain hospitalized six more days.

He said Whittington "still kind of wonders what all the hoopla is about."

"It's kind of much ado about nothing."

The White House expressed hope that Cheney's public comments would defuse the uproar.

But Democrats continued to pound away.

Even before the interview, the office of Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., issued a statement accusing Cheney of being "unable, or unwilling, to level with the American people."

Cheney's account largely squared with that of Katharine Armstrong, one of the owners of the huge Armstrong Ranch in southern Texas where the vice president was hunting Saturday.

Whittington, dressed in hunter's orange, had left the group of three hunters to recover another bird he had shot and, according to Armstrong, failed to let his partners know he had returned.

Cheney said he was trying to shoot a low-flying quail when he swung his 28-gauge shotgun to the right, the setting sun in his eyes.

"I turned and shot at the bird, and at that second saw Harry standing there," he said.


Cheney estimated that Whittington was 30 yards away when the birdshot struck the right side of his face, neck and torso and knocked him to the ground, where he lay bleeding as the vice president rushed over.

The vice president said a physician assistant from his entourage arrived on the scene within a minute or two to treat Whittington, who was later taken to a hospital with as many as 200 pellets embedded in him.

The vice president said he had consumed a beer during a barbecue lunch hours earlier, but added that no one was drinking at the time of the shooting.

Kenedy County Sheriff Ramon Salinas III has said that the shooting was an accident with no misconduct involved.

But if Whittington were to die, Carlos Valdez, the district attorney for Kleberg County, said a grand jury would investigate the case and could press criminal charges.

end quotes

Well ...

Forensic analysis, indeed ....

First off, clearly, after this "blackout" of any news leaking out on this INCIDENT, it would be expected that the BIG GRIZ's story would match that of this Ms. Armstrong ...

My God, they had long enough to get this all rehearsed after all ...

"Okay, Dick, this is what we are all going to say ..."

And now, we have this rich REPUBLICAN lawyer "cooping" there in an intensive care room ....

"FOR HIS PRIVACY" ...

Which means that someone of a lesser stature than this lawyer who really needs that room is going to be deprived ...

Because of this deference being shown this rich REPUBLICAN lawyer ...

Who don't need to be in intensive care, at all ....

According to them, anyway ...

As though intensive care in a hospital were like a private hotel for rich REPUBLICAN shooting victims who want their "right to privacy" jealously guarded ....

BY EVERYONE ...

While they work assiduously to guarantee that we do not have the same ...

RIGHTS, that is ....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 16 2006, 07:52 AM)
Yes, indeed ...

You do hear it said from time to time that these big, predatory carnivores like Dick Cheney, the "BIG WYOMING GRIZ", that they can be tamed ...

Domesticated ...

As though they were just some big dog or something ....

And some people do appear able to tame them ...

To have wild animals like wolves and grizzly bears around them ...

Even living with them in houses and such ....

But the question always does remain ...

Are they really tame?

Might they turn?

And no one, absolutely no one ...

Ever quite knows for sure ....

And in the end, the real grizzly bear, or the wolf, for that matter, would not stoop to, or tolerate, the exceedingly beastial, sick and perverted abombinal "conduct" that its alleged human "counterpart", the HONORABLE Richard Cheney, the "BIG GRIZ", has been advocating for quite some time now, that being the TORTURE of human beings by Dick and George's version of what they think OUR America should be ...

Which is this crawling obscenity similar to the one in Europe that OUR other America went to war to defeat back in the 1940's ......

"New, graphic images from Abu Ghraib aired - Officials fear previously unseen pictures, video will further enflame Muslims"

By ROBERT H. REID, Associated Press
First published: Thursday, February 16, 2006

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- New images showing Iraqis abused by U.S. guards at Abu Ghraib prison three years ago threatened Wednesday to enflame public anger already running high over footage of British soldiers beating youths in southern Iraq.

Images of naked prisoners, some bloodied and lying on the floor, were taken about the same time as earlier photos that triggered a worldwide scandal and led to military trials and prison sentences for several lower-ranking American soldiers.

Many of the pictures broadcast Wednesday by Australia's Special Broadcasting Service, including some that appear to show corpses, were more graphic than those previously published.

One of the video clips depicted a group of naked men with bags over their heads standing together and masturbating.

The network said it was forced to participate.


In the Middle East, where there have been widespread anti-Western protests recently over caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya TV aired some of the Australian station's footage but refrained from using the most shocking and sexually explicit images.

CNN also broadcast excerpts.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the Defense Department believed the release of additional images of prisoner abuse was harmful and "could only further inflame and possibly incite unnecessary violence in the world."

Whitman said he did not know whether the photos and video clips were among images the Pentagon has been withholding from public release since 2004.


But another defense official said Army officials had reviewed the photographs posted on the Sydney Morning Herald's Web site and matched them to images that were among those turned over to military authorities in 2004 by a U.S. soldier.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to address the matter publicly, said the photos contained no new information about abuse.

Although the Abu Ghraib case was exhaustively reported here years ago, the new images could revive the issue of treatment of Iraqis by U.S.-led occupation forces.

This week's release of video showing British troops beating Iraqi youths during a violent 2004 protest in the southern city of Amarah prompted the Basra provincial administration to sever ties with British authorities.

The fresh Abu Ghraib pictures were broadcast as the United States is trying to reach out to the disaffected Sunni Arab community, the backbone of the insurgency, in hopes of encouraging Sunni insurgents to lay down their arms and join the political process.

Most of those who suffered abuse at Abu Ghraib were believed to have been Sunni Arabs.

Mindful of the risks, some key Iraqi officials either avoided comment or sought to play down the images, noting the Americans had already punished Abu Ghraib guards.

Presidential security adviser Lt. Gen. Wafiq al-Samaraei called the abuse "unjustifiable" but added that it was important to remember that the actions occurred more than two years ago, offenders had been punished and rules on treatment of prisoners were tightened.

Saddam warned U.S.

Saddam Hussein told aides in the mid-1990s that he warned the United States it could be hit by a terrorist attack, ABC News reported Wednesday, citing 12 hours of tapes the network obtained of the former Iraqi dictator's talks with his Cabinet.

"Terrorism is coming."

"I told the Americans," Saddam is heard saying, adding he "told the British as well."

"In the future, what would prevent a booby-trapped car causing a nuclear explosion in Washington or a germ or a chemical one?" Saddam said.

But he insisted Iraq would never launch such an attack.

ABC News said the CIA found the tapes in Iraq and that the 12 hours were provided to it by Bill Tierney, a former member of a U.N. inspection team who was translating them for the FBI.

Official alleges torture

Nermine Othman, Iraq's human rights minister, said that 170 Iraqis were tortured last year in a secret prison in Baghdad.

Othman said the torture occurred in Interior Ministry buildings.

Death squad operating

Maj. Gen. Joseph Peterson, the American general overseeing the training of Iraqi police, said the U.S. military has stumbled across the first evidence of a death squad within Iraq's Interior Ministry.

Allegations that death squads targeting Sunnis are operating within Shiite-dominated police forces have been circulating since last May.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Feb 15 2006, 10:28 PM)
"Those ripples build a current ...."

"That can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."


- Robert F. Kennedy, US Attorney General 1961-64, assassinated in Los Angeles while campaigning, 1968.
*

We can only hope ...

Even with an oppressive and tyrannical crowd that is as well entrenched here in OUR America as these BUSHCOS .....

Who, like a virus ...

Seem to have infected OUR America with perversion and beastiality ...

Right on down to the level of its most common citizens ....

"Iraq Death Squad Claims Being Investigated"

By PAUL GARWOOD, Associated Press Writer

1 hour, 1 minute ago

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq's Interior Ministry has launched an investigation into claims that a police death squad has been operating in the country, a top official said Thursday.

Meanwhile, attacks around the country killed 10 people, including six Iraqis who died in a car bomb in Bagdad.


Iraq Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari also condemned the latest images of detainees abused in the U.S.-run Abu Ghraib prison in 2003, but noted that those responsible had already been punished.

The investigation into the death squads was announced as police found the bodies of 10 more men who had been shot execution-style and dumped in three different areas of Baghdad's predominantly Shiite suburb of Shula.

Maj. Gen. Hussein Kamal, Iraq's deputy interior minister in charge of domestic intelligence, said the investigation followed U.S. military claims that soldiers had detained 22 Iraqi men wearing police uniforms who were about to kill a Sunni Arab man last month.

"We have been informed about this and the interior minister has formed an investigation committee to learn more about the Sunni person and those 22 men, particularly whether they work for the Interior Ministry or claim to belong to the ministry," Kamal told The Associated Press.

A U.S. general said American forces had found evidence of a death squad operating in Iraq's Interior Ministry, the Chicago Tribune reported on its Web site Wednesday evening.

Maj. Gen. Joseph Peterson, who commands the civilian police training teams in Iraq, said the men were employed by the Interior Ministry as highway patrol officers.


An American military official in Baghdad confirmed the report but declined to provide further details.

He spoke on condition of anonymity as he was unauthorized to speak to the media.

The bodies of Sunni Arabs, bound and gagged and shot in the head, have been turning up in Baghdad for months, fueling allegations of sectarian killings, which Sunni Arab leaders say are often carried out by Shiites in army or police uniforms.

Shiites have also been systematically massacred by Sunni extremists in Baghdad, Diyala province and mixed areas to the south of the capital.

Human Rights Minister Nermine Othman said she believed lower-level Interior Ministry officials were using criminals to kill Iraqis.

"I think there are many people inside the Interior Ministry involved with these deaths or giving the uniforms of colleagues to criminals," she said.

"These officials are helping the criminals by informing them on where targeted people are going or where people are living."

"They are helping them in different ways."


A Sunni Arab political group, the Iraqi Islamic Party, praised the investigation and said perpetrators should be brought to justice.

"Since a very long time, we have been talking about such violations and we have been telling the Interior Ministry officials that there are squads that raid houses and arrest people who are found later executed in different parts of the capital," said party member Nasser al-Ani.

In the latest violence, a car bomb targeting a U.S. military patrol killed six civilians and wounded 11 Thursday in northern Baghdad's Shula neighborhood, said police Maj. Moussa Abdul Karim.

An Iraqi policeman was killed and three bystanders were wounded by a car bomb in Baghdad's Karradah neighborhood, while gunmen killed an Iraqi Army captain and his driver in the northern city of Kirkuk, police said.

Three prominent Iraqi tribal members were also fatally shot in a drive-by attack on their car north of Baghdad, police said.

A Jordanian Embassy driver was killed in a drive-by shooting in western Baghdad, officials said.

Another car bomb blast in Baghdad targeted the convoy of Nouri al-Nouri, a former government human rights official who was dismissed in December over the discovery of tortured detainees in a Baghdad government building.

Al-Nouri escaped the blast unharmed but four civilians were wounded, police Lt. Mohammed Khayoun said.

The motive for the attack was unclear, but it came as Othman, the human rights minister, said several Interior and Justice Ministry employees were expected to be prosecuted over the torture about 170 Iraqis, most found in November at the Jadriyah Interior Ministry facility in Baghdad.

Othman said her ministry will release a final report on the torture claims next month.

In a statement on the detainee abuse photos broadcast on an Australian TV station Wednesday, al-Jaafari said "the Iraqi government condemns the torture practices revealed through the recent pictures that show Iraqi prisoners being tortured."

But he welcomed the U.S. denunciation of the pictures, which date back to 2003, when earlier images were released of U.S. forces abusing detainees.
Snuffysmith
http://www.counterpunch.org/solomon02162006.html

Dancing Around Accountability
Dick Cheney's Fox Trot
By NORMAN SOLOMON

When Dick Cheney surfaced on Wednesday long enough for an interview with Fox News eminence Brit Hume -- an event that CNN’s Jack Cafferty promptly likened to “Bonnie interviewing Clyde” -- the vice presidential spin emerged from a timeworn bag of political tricks. Cheney took responsibility. Whatever that means.

The New York Times website swiftly made its top headline “Cheney Takes Full Responsibility for Shooting Hunter.” Just before Fox News Channel aired interview segments at length, the summary from anchor Hume told viewers that Cheney had accepted “full responsibility for the incident.” Hours later, the Washington Post’s front-page story led this way: “Vice President Cheney accepted full responsibility yesterday...”

Ironically -- while news outlets kept using the phrase “full responsibility” -- the transcript of the interview posted on FoxNews.com shows that Cheney never used any form of the word “responsibility.”

Whatever their exact words, the politicians who can’t avoid acknowledging culpability are often the beneficiaries of excessive media plaudits for supposedly owning up to what they’ve done wrong. But those politicians rarely do more than just what the spin doctor ordered.

It’s not brave or even forthright for an official to express the contrition that seems advisable from a public-relations standpoint. When a convicted defendant voices remorse just before sentencing, the statement is often viewed as little more than a ploy dictated by circumstance. But when a politician ostensibly “takes responsibility” in the court of public opinion, much of the media coverage attaches great significance to an essentially hollow statement that is a transparent effort to extinguish a scandal-fueled firestorm.

In almost every instance when a politician “takes responsibility” with great fanfare, there’s no penalty attached to the proclamation. Across the terrain of political media, the I-take-responsibility maneuver is the equivalent of a hit-and-run driver offering an over-the-shoulder yell of “Sorry about that” while speeding away from a grisly scene.

On July 30, 2003 -- several months after the occupation of Iraq began -- President Bush held a news conference while U.S. forces continued to search in vain for weapons of mass destruction. High up in a front-page story, the New York Times reported that Bush “took responsibility for the first time for an assertion in his State of the Union address about Iraq’s nuclear weapons program that turned out to be based on questionable intelligence.”

Bush told reporters: “I take personal responsibility for everything I say, of course. I also take responsibility for making decisions on war and peace. And I analyzed a thorough body of intelligence, good, solid, sound intelligence that led me to come to the conclusion that it was necessary to remove Saddam Hussein from power.”

In that instance, as in so many others, the president’s declaration about taking responsibility was nothing more than hot air for inflated rhetoric -- a dodge to divert attention from indefensible actions and evident deceptions.

Last year, on Sept. 13 at the White House, the president said: “Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at all levels of government, and to the extent that the federal government didn’t fully do its job right, I take responsibility.” Policies during the five months since then have compounded the administration’s deadly negligence in response to Hurricane Katrina, underscoring the diversionary significance of the I-take-responsibility scam.

When Brit Hume and Dick Cheney did their Fox trot, they were performing the kind of spectacle we’ve seen many times on television. Network correspondents and powerful politicians know the boundaries and the steps. Their footwork may look simple, but it’s fancy and well-practiced. Contrary to pretense, the probing journalist doesn’t probe too much, and the forthcoming politician merely hunkers down with a new twist.

And so it goes: Whether the media uproar has to do with a quail hunt, or lethal negligence in connection with a hurricane, or chronic deception for a war, top officials may finally opt to “take responsibility.” But that’s nothing more than a propaganda technique for those who view lying as an essential means of governance.

Norman Solomon’s latest book is “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” For information, go to: www.WarMadeEasy.com
Livyjr
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Feb 16 2006, 10:11 AM)
http://www.counterpunch.org/solomon02162006.html

"Dancing Around Accountability - Dick Cheney's Fox Trot"

By NORMAN SOLOMON

And so it goes:

Whether the media uproar has to do with a quail hunt ....

Or lethal negligence in connection with a hurricane ....

Or chronic deception for a war .....

Top officials may finally opt to “take responsibility” ....

But that’s nothing more than a propaganda technique ....

For those who view lying as an essential means of governance .....

There was a time in this country when it had "leaders" instead of politicians ...

And there was a time when those leaders talked straight ...

Because they needed to be understood ...

Much was at stake ...

And it had to do with the survival of the nation itself ...

For example ...

George Washington .....

He did not use a spokesperson like this present BUSHCO crowd does ...

He could speak for himself ....

Because he was one ...

A practiced leader ...

And so ...

He did not need some media dandy to go out there and pump him up ...

And Abe Lincoln ...

Read the Lincoln-Douglas Debates ...

And there is Lincoln articulating HIS own point of view ...

Whether you like it ...

Or not ...

And whether you agree ....

Or not ....

As well .....

And there are others ....

FDR certainly was articulate ....

Eisenhower was a leader .....

He could also speak for himself ......

And now ...

We have a charade on-going in the White House, it seems ...

We have a caricature for a president ...

And a seeming thug for a vice-president ...

And we are supposed to believe that this is all the result of some "rational" process ....

And what a crock that is ....

For a rational approach to governing does not produce skewed results like these ....

No way in HELL ....

SO ....

The concluding lines in this article you posted above really speak volumes about where we are right now today in OUR America ....

With this crowd we have in power ....

Who view lying as an essential means of THEIR governance .....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Feb 16 2006, 10:11 AM)
http://www.counterpunch.org/solomon02162006.html

"Dancing Around Accountability - Dick Cheney's Fox Trot"

By NORMAN SOLOMON

When Dick Cheney surfaced on Wednesday long enough for an interview with Fox News eminence Brit Hume -- an event that CNN’s Jack Cafferty promptly likened to “Bonnie interviewing Clyde” -- the vice presidential spin emerged from a timeworn bag of political tricks.

Cheney took responsibility.

But that’s nothing more than a propaganda technique ...

For those who view lying as an essential means of governance ....

Well ...

Whatever the dance really is that America's Dick is doing .....

As always ...

He has a ready and willing partner ....

In America's George .....

"Oh, Dick ..."

"Oh, Dick ..."

"That's just so absolutely, you know, well, how can I say this, so powerful, Dick ..."

"That was so powerful ..."

"That was very powerful, indeed ..."

"OH, Dick, I'm so satisfied ..."

"Bush Approves Cheney's Handling of Mishap"

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

30 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - President Bush said Thursday he was satisfied with Vice President Dick Cheney's explanation about his shooting accident in Texas.

"I thought the vice president handled the issue just fine," the president said in his first public comments on Saturday's accident.

"I thought his explanation yesterday was a powerful explanation."


Bush said it was "a deeply traumatic moment for him and obviously it was a tragic moment for Harry Whittington."

He said that the shooting "profoundly affected the vice president."

Bush said Democrats are drawing "the wrong conclusion about a tragic accident" when they say it depicts the White House as overly secretive.

"Yesterday when he was here in the Oval Office I saw the deep concern he (Cheney) had about a person who he wounded," Bush said.

"I thought yesterday's explanation was a very strong and important explanation to make to the American people."


Bush said Whittington, the 78-year-old attorney shot by Cheney in the face, chest and neck, is "a fine man" whom he knew from his days as governor of Texas.

"He's been involved in our state's politics for a long period of time."

"My concern is for Harry and I know the vice president feels the same way."

While some White House officials were unhappy about the vice president's handling of the accident, Bush did not publicly object to Cheney's decision not to make the shooting public until Sunday, the day after it happened.

The president also did not express concern about the fact that Cheney did not speak to him about the accident until they saw each other on Monday.


Bush recounted Cheney's explanation of the accident.

"He heard a bird flush and he turned and pulled the trigger and saw his friend get wounded," the president said.

Bush, during an Oval Office photo opportunity, seemed upset when pressed about whether he was satisfied that Cheney had disclosed the shooting in a timely way.

"I'm satisfied with the explanation he gave," Bush said tersely.

"I thought his explanation yesterday was a very strong and powerful explanation and I'm satisfied with the explanation he gave," the president said.


end quotes

Strong and powerful?

What is this?

The Elizabethan stage, or something?

Was Dick orating here?

Was this some kind of drama presentation?

Or was Dick Cheney supposed to be telling us the truth, instead?
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 16 2006, 04:56 PM)
"Bush Approves Cheney's Handling of Mishap"

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - President Bush said Thursday he was satisfied with Vice President Dick Cheney's explanation about his shooting accident in Texas.

"I thought the vice president handled the issue just fine," the president said in his first public comments on Saturday's accident.

"I thought his explanation yesterday was a powerful explanation."

Unfortunately, George ...

There is a federal judge out there ...

Who seems to be questioning some of the statements of your alleged Justice Department .......

Which maybe were not quite powerful enough ...

In convincing this federal judge ...

And the American people, as well ...

That your alleged Justice Department was following any laws at all ...

When it unilaterally decided ...

That it wanted to violate the rights ...

Of the American people ....

As they are set down in the laws of this nation ...

Laws which your crowd sees fit to disregard ...

Whenever you or they please ....

"Judge Orders Action on Spying Documents"

By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer

53 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - A federal judge dealt a setback to the Bush administration on its warrantless surveillance program, ordering the Justice Department on Thursday to release documents about the highly classified effort within 20 days or compile a list of what it is withholding.

U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy said a private group will suffer irreparable harm if the documents it has been seeking since December are not processed promptly under the Freedom of Information Act.

The Justice Department failed to meet the time restraints under FOIA and failed to make a case that it was impractical to deal quickly with the request by the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller said no determination has been made as to what the government's next step will be.


At a court hearing a week ago, Justice Department lawyer Rupa Bhattacharyya said the government would respond starting March 3, but she said she had no information on when the process might be completed.

Timing will depend on complexity, "and in this case there are a lot of complexities," Bhattacharyya said.

Kennedy wrote that "courts have the authority to impose concrete deadlines on agencies that delay the processing of requests meriting expedition."

Routine FOIA requests are to be handled within 20 days while expedited requests have no set time limit under the law, prompting the Justice Department to take the position that the amount of time for expedited requests could be longer than that for the routine 20-day handling.

"Congress could not have intended to create the absurd situation" enabling the government to unilaterally exceed the standard 20-day period, Kennedy wrote.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 16 2006, 04:56 PM)
"I'm satisfied with the explanation he gave," Bush said tersely.

"I thought his explanation yesterday was a very strong and powerful explanation and I'm satisfied with the explanation he gave," the president said.

Somebody is not pleased with yours, though, George ...

That torture stuff that you and Dick are promoting .....

And all that stuff involving those men and their private parts .....

Who did you guys think you would be impressing with that as your military policy for taking over the world, anyway?

And who exactly is responsible for that business with these men and their private parts?

Douglas Feith?

Paul Wolfowitz?

RUMMY, himself?

"Annan Says U.S. Should Close Gitmo Prison"

By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer

46 minutes ago

UNITED NATIONS - Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Thursday said the United States should close the prison at Guantanamo Bay for terror suspects as soon as possible, backing a key conclusion of a U.N.-appointed independent panel.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan rejected the call to shut the camp, saying the military treats all detainees humanely and "these are dangerous terrorists that we're talking about."

The panel's report, released Wednesday in Geneva and leaked earlier in the week, said the United States must close the detention facility "without further delay" because it is effectively a torture camp where prisoners have no access to justice.


Annan told reporters he didn't necessarily agree with everything in the report, but he did support its opposition to people being held "in perpetuity" without being charged and prosecuted in a public court.

This is "something that is common under every legal system," he said.

"I think sooner or later there will be a need to close the Guantanamo (camp), and I think it will be up to the government to decide, and hopefully to do it as soon as is possible," the secretary-general told reporters.

The 54-page report summarizing an investigation by five U.N. experts, accused the United States of practices that "amount to torture" and demanded detainees be allowed a fair trial or be freed.

The panel, which had sought access to Guantanamo Bay since 2002, refused a U.S. offer for three experts to visit the camp in November after being told they could not interview detainees.


Annan said the report by a U.N.-appointed independent panel was not a U.N. report but one by individual experts.

"So we should see it in that light," he said.

U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said the report will be presented to the U.N. Commission of Human Rights, which appointed the panel, when it convenes on March 13 in Geneva.

Manfred Nowak, the U.N. investigator for torture who was one of the panel's experts, told The Associated Press in Geneva that the detainees at Guantanamo "should be released or brought before an independent court."

"That should not be done in Guantanamo Bay, but before ordinary U.S. courts, or courts in their countries of origin or perhaps an international tribunal," he said.

The United States should allow "a full and independent investigation" at Guantanamo and also give the United Nations access to other detention centers, including secret ones, in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, Nowak said by telephone from his office in Vienna, Austria.

"We want to have all information about secret places of detention because whenever there is a secret place of detention, there is also a higher risk that people are subjected to torture," he said.


The United States is holding about 490 men at the military detention center.

They are accused of links to Afghanistan's ousted Taliban regime or to al-Qaida, but only a handful have been charged.

The U.N. investigators said photographic evidence — corroborated by testimony of former prisoners — showed detainees shackled, chained and hooded.

Prisoners were beaten, stripped and shaved if they resisted, they said.

The report's findings were based on interviews with former detainees, public documents, media reports, lawyers and questions answered by the U.S. government, which detailed the number of prisoners held but did not give their names or the status of charges against them.

Some of the interrogation techniques — particularly the use of dogs, exposure to extreme temperatures, sleep deprivation and prolonged isolation — caused extreme suffering, the report said.

"Such treatment amounts to torture, as it inflicts severe pain or suffering on the victims for the purpose of intimidation and/or punishment," the report said.


The International Committee of the Red Cross is the only independent monitoring body allowed to visit Guantanamo's detainees, but it reports its findings solely to U.S. authorities.

Legislators and journalists have been allowed in on guided tours but few are permitted to see interrogations.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the U.N. report "clearly suffers from their unwillingness to take us up on our offer to go down to Guantanamo to observe first-hand the operations."

McClellan, the White House spokesman, echoed Whitman, saying "it's a discredit to the U.N. when a team like this goes about rushing to report something when they haven't even looked into the facts."

"All they have done is look at the allegations."


Although his statement did not address specific allegations, the Pentagon has acknowledged 10 cases of abuse or mistreatment at Guantanamo, including a female interrogator climbing onto a detainee's lap and a detainee whose knees were bruised from being forced to kneel repeatedly.

In Strasbourg, France, the European Parliament condemned the treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo and renewed its calls for the detention center to be closed.

Human rights activists also supported the investigators' findings.

Amnesty International said the report was only the "tip of the iceberg."

"The United States also operates detention facilities at Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan, Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in Iraq and has been implicated in the use of secret detention facilities in other countries," an Amnesty statement said.

Many of the allegations in the report have been made before.

But the document represented the first inquiry launched by the 53-nation U.N. Human Rights Commission, the world body's top rights watchdog.
___

Associated Press correspondents Sam Cage and Alexander G. Higgins in Geneva, Jan Sliva in Strasbourg, France, and Jennifer Loven in Washington contributed to this report.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 16 2006, 05:30 PM)
"Annan Says U.S. Should Close Gitmo Prison"

By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS - Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Thursday said the United States should close the prison at Guantanamo Bay for terror suspects as soon as possible, backing a key conclusion of a U.N.-appointed independent panel.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan rejected the call to shut the camp, saying the military treats all detainees humanely and "these are dangerous terrorists that we're talking about."

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the U.N. report "clearly suffers from their unwillingness to take us up on our offer to go down to Guantanamo to observe first-hand the operations."

McClellan, the White House spokesman, echoed Whitman, saying "it's a discredit to the U.N. when a team like this goes about rushing to report something when they haven't even looked into the facts."

"All they have done is look at the allegations."

NOW ....

There is a pot calling a kettle black alright .....

Scotty "BOY" McClellan running his mouth about the U.N. rushing to report something when they haven't even looked into the facts .....

Those same words from Scotty "BOY" McClellan apply directly to George W. Bush's ill-fated BLITZKREIG armored invasion of IRAQINAM ......

Where George W. Bush, and Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld and Colin Powell, and "CON-JOB CONNIE" Rice and Scotty "BOY" were all rushing to report something when they not only hadn't even looked into the facts .....

But had made up out of whole cloth an entirely different reality ...

Than the one that actually existed .....

In the real time and space occupied by the rest of us ...

Here in OUR America ....

And so ....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr)
"Climate expert claims coercion - Top NASA scientist says Bush administration is pressuring him to stop speaking out about dangers of greenhouse gases and links to global warming"

By ANDREW C. REVKIN, New York Times
First published: Sunday, January 29, 2006

NEW YORK - The top climate scientist at NASA says the Bush administration has tried to stop him from speaking out since he gave a lecture last month calling prompt reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases linked to global warming.

The scientist, James E. Hansen, longtime director of the agency's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said in an interview that officials at NASA headquarters had ordered the public affairs staff to review his coming lectures, papers, postings on the Goddard Web site and requests for interviews from journalists.

Hansen said he would ignore the restrictions.

And here .....

Once again ...

As a GOOD AMERICAN .....

One who gets his daily operating instructions ....

Or general orders, as it were, for the day ....

Right from Scotty "BOY" McClellan himself .....

His daily tips on what you must do today for George W. Bush and the REPUBLICAN PARTY ...

To be considered a GOOD AMERICAN ...

By them .....

I find myself once again in the position of having to issue this disclaimer before posting this next story ....

That this GLOBAL WARMING business discussed in this article ....

WELL ...

It's not real .....

No, no ...

It's not real at all ....

It's a political attack on George W. Bush and Dick Cheney is really what it is ...

Because George and Dick have a lot of lawyers down there in the White House with them ...

And all these lawyers are real smart and everything like that ...

And they have conducted their own research ...

And what they have found ...

Is that there is absolutely no GLOBAL WARMING whatsoever ....

And so .....

THIS NEXT STORY JUST CANNOT BE TRUE ....

Right, Scotty ....

"Greenland glaciers melting faster, study finds"

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent

1 hour, 54 minutes ago

ST. LOUIS (Reuters) - Greenland's glaciers are dumping twice as much ice into the Atlantic Ocean now as five years ago because glaciers are moving and melting more quickly, researchers said on Thursday.

This could mean oceans will rise even faster than forecast, and rising surface air temperatures appear to be to blame, the researchers report in Friday's issue of the journal Science.

"This change, combined with increased melting, suggests that existing estimates of future sea level rise are too low," Julian Dowdeswell of the Scott Polar Research Institute at Britain's Cambridge University wrote in a commentary.

"At 1.7 million square km (656,000 square miles), up to 3 km (nearly two miles) thick and a little smaller than Mexico, the Greenland Ice Sheet would raise global sea level by about 7 meters (22 feet) if it melted completely."


The study did not explore what is causing the rising air temperatures in Greenland, but most scientists agree that human activity, notably the burning of fossil fuels, is playing an important role in global warming.

Eric Rignot of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology and Pannir Kanagaratnam of the University of Kansas used satellite data to track the movement of Greenland's glaciers, which slide slowly down to the sea and deposit ice.

They calculated that Greenland contributes about 0.02 inch (half a millimeter) to the annual 0.1 inch (3 mm) rise in global sea levels.

Since 1996, southeast Greenland's outlet glaciers have been flowing more quickly and since 2000 glaciers farther north have also sped up.

Rignot and Kanagaratnam found that ice loss due to glacier flow has increased from 12 cubic miles of ice loss per year in 1996 to 36 cubic miles of ice loss per year in 2005.


"It takes a long time to build and melt an ice sheet, but glaciers can react quickly to temperature changes," Rignot said in a statement.

He said the models now used to predict how much ice Greenland will lose, and what effect that will have on sea levels, may underestimate the outcome.

Rising air temperatures are clearly a factor, the researchers told a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which publishes Science.

Over the last 20 years, the air temperature in southeast Greenland has risen by 5.4 degrees F (3 degrees C).

Warmer air lubricates the bottoms of glaciers, helping them slide faster.

"Climate warming can work in different ways, but generally speaking, if you warm up the ice sheet, the glacier will flow faster," said Rignot.

And it may melt even more quickly in years to come, he added.

"The southern half of Greenland is reacting to what we think is climate warming."

"The northern half is waiting, but I don't think it's going to take long," Rignot said.
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 16 2006, 05:41 PM)
NOW ....

There is a pot calling a kettle black alright .....

Scotty "BOY" McClellan running his mouth about the U.N. rushing to report something when they haven't even looked into the facts .....

Those same words from Scotty "BOY" McClellan apply directly to George W. Bush's ill-fated BLITZKREIG armored invasion of IRAQINAM ......

Where George W. Bush, and Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld and Colin Powell, and "CON-JOB CONNIE" Rice and Scotty "BOY" were all rushing to report something when they not only hadn't even looked into the facts .....

But had made up out of whole cloth an entirely different reality ...

Than the one that actually existed .....

In the real time and space occupied by the rest of us ...

Here in OUR America ....

And so ....

*

And speaking about "CON-JOB" .....

February 16, 2006

"Rice Is Seeking Millions to Prod Changes in Iran"

By STEVEN R. WEISMAN

WASHINGTON, Feb. 15 — The Bush administration, frustrated by Iranian defiance over its nuclear program, proposed Wednesday to spend $85 million to promote political change inside Iran by subsidizing dissident groups, unions, student fellowships and television and radio broadcasts.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, announcing a request for the money at a Senate hearing, said the administration had worked out a way to circumvent American laws barring financial relations with Iran to allow some money to go directly to groups promoting change inside the country.

"We are going to begin a new effort to support the aspirations of the Iranian people," Ms. Rice said at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"We will use this money to develop support networks for Iranian reformers, political dissidents and human rights activists."

Senior State Department officials said they did not intend to publicize recipients of the money in the future, for fear that they could be jailed or even killed.


"This is a very good idea, but all these efforts face the same problem," said Michael McFaul, a political science professor at Stanford University.

"In working with their potential colleagues in Iran, will they get them into trouble?"

"Once they participate in a training program, what happens to them back in their country?"

The scope of the administration's effort goes beyond the numbers.

Until now, the United States has been cautious about supporting dissident groups, fearful that Iranians may view these efforts as an echo of past American meddling in Iran's affairs.

Though no one uses the words "regime change" to describe the ultimate American goal, that term has been used by conservatives in Congress who have in the last few years pressed for aid to Iranian dissidents.

Ms. Rice said the State Department was requesting $75 million to promote democracy in Iran, which she said would be added to $10 million already appropriated for that purpose.

The total is an increase from only $3.5 million the previous year.

Until recently, the administration has been cautious about embracing the "regime change" approach, but some conservatives at the Defense Department and Vice President Dick Cheney's office are known to be resigned to a nuclear-armed Iran and to argue that the best way to address that problem is by opening Iran to democracy and reform.

American officials, asking not to be identified while discussing internal administration deliberations, said the election last year of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whose actions and statements have alarmed the West, had strengthened the hands of those who want to promote internal change in Iran.


European countries involved in negotiating with Iran over the last year have also been uneasy until recently about doing anything to provoke Iranian leaders.

But now that talks over Iran's nuclear program are at an impasse, and Iran is proceeding with uranium enrichment in defiance of the West, there is less concern about harming relations.

Ms. Rice's announcement is considered certain to anger Iranian leaders, who have long cited the American support for a coup in 1953 as an example of its designs on Iran.

The administration's limited attempts to channel money to human rights groups, labor unions and political organizations in Iran have not achieved much success so far, and many experts fear that future efforts could aid the wrong people or backfire on them if the financing becomes public.

The administration will try to upgrade American broadcasts into Iran by Voice of America and Radio Farda, an American-sponsored station that mostly plays music.

Ms. Rice's announcement said the administration would try to form partnerships with Farsi satellite television and radio stations in Los Angeles.

But Iranian experts caution that the private American stations have content that may be viewed as unsuitable in Iran.

In addition, American officials say the administration needs to be careful not to align itself with people in the Iranian diaspora who have political agendas that are unpopular in Iran.

Among these are monarchists who support the family of the late shah of Iran.


The American aid announced by Ms. Rice is to include $25 million to support "political dissidents, labor union leaders and human rights activists" and to work with nongovernmental organizations outside Iran to build support inside the country.

The administration plans $50 million to increase television broadcasting to 24 hours a day all week in Farsi into Iran.

Another $5 million is aimed at bringing Iranian students and scholars to study in the West, and $5 million more is earmarked for setting up Internet sites.

end quotes

AAAaahhh ...

The sweet sounds of another great big HOOVER vacuum cleaner starting up here ...

With its suction hose firmly into the bulk and mass of OUR tax dollars in the American treasury ...

And its outlet going to God only knows where ......

But somebody's pocket, indeed .....

Trickle down economy, hell ...

This is "suck up" economics in operation, big time ...

Here in OUR America ...

A con-job, indeed ...

Shades of Ahmad Chalabi and his Iraqinami National Congress, all over again ...

And what's his name ...

That "Sling-shot" guy ...

Or was it "Oddball" ....

No, that wasn't it ....

Oh, yeah ..

Curveball .....

And here we go again ....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 16 2006, 06:39 PM)
February 16, 2006

"Rice Is Seeking Millions to Prod Changes in Iran"

By STEVEN R. WEISMAN

WASHINGTON, Feb. 15 — The Bush administration, frustrated by Iranian defiance over its nuclear program, proposed Wednesday to spend $85 million to promote political change inside Iran by subsidizing dissident groups, unions, student fellowships and television and radio broadcasts.

"We are going to begin a new effort to support the aspirations of the Iranian people," Ms. Rice said at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.


end quotes

AAAaahhh ...

The sweet sounds of another great big HOOVER vacuum cleaner starting up here ...

With its suction hose firmly into the bulk and mass of OUR tax dollars in the American treasury ...

And its outlet going to God only knows where ......

But somebody's pocket, indeed .....

Trickle down economy, hell ...

This is "suck up" economics in operation, big time ...

Here in OUR America ...

A con-job, indeed ...

Shades of Ahmad Chalabi and his Iraqinami National Congress, all over again ...

And what's his name ...

That "Sling-shot" guy ...

Or was it "Oddball" ....

No, that wasn't it ....

Oh, yeah ..

Curveball .....

And here we go again ....

*

NY Times, February 15, 2006

"Quick Rise for Purveyors of Propaganda in Iraq"

By DAVID S. CLOUD

WASHINGTON, Feb. 14 — Two years ago, Christian Bailey and Paige Craig were living in a half-renovated Washington group house, with a string of failed startup companies behind them.

Mr. Bailey, a boyish-looking Briton, and Mr. Craig, a chain-smoking former Marine sergeant, then began winning multimillion-dollar contracts with the United States military to produce propaganda in Iraq.

Now their company, Lincoln Group, works out of elegant offices along Pennsylvania Avenue and sponsors polo matches in Virginia horse country.

Mr. Bailey recently bought a million-dollar Georgetown row house.

Mr. Craig drives a Jaguar and shows up for interviews accompanied by his "director of security," a beefy bodyguard.


The company's rise, though, has been built in part by exaggerated claims about its abilities and connections, according to interviews with more than a dozen current and former Lincoln Group employees and associates, and a review of company documents.

In collecting government money, Lincoln has followed a blueprint taught to Mr. Bailey by Daniel S. Peña Sr., a retired American businessman who described Mr. Bailey as a protégé.

Federal contracts in Washington can supply easy seed capital for a struggling entrepreneur, Mr. Peña says he advised a youthful Mr. Bailey in the mid-1990's when the two men started a short-lived technology company.

"I told him, 'When in trouble, go to D.C.,' and the kid listened," Mr. Peña said.


Mr. Bailey defends his company's record, saying, "Lincoln Group successfully executes challenging assignments."

He added that "teams are created from the best available resources."

Lincoln won its contracts after claiming to have partnerships with major media and advertising companies, former government officials with extensive Middle East experience, and ex-military officers with background in intelligence and psychological warfare, the documents show.

But some of those companies and individuals say their associations were fleeting.

Lincoln has also run into problems delivering on work for the military after its partnerships with more experienced firms fell apart, company documents and interviews indicate.

The firm has continued to bid for new business from the Pentagon and has hired two Washington lobbying firms to promote itself on Capitol Hill and with the Bush administration.

"They appear very professional on the surface, then you dig a little deeper and you find that they are pretty amateurish," said Jason Santamaria, a former Marine officer whom the company once described as a "strategic adviser."


The company's work in Iraq, where Mr. Bailey and Mr. Craig visit from time to time to direct operations, is facing growing scrutiny.

The Pentagon's inspector general last month opened an audit of Lincoln Group's contracts there, according to two Defense Department officials.

A separate inquiry ordered by Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the top American commander in Iraq, after disclosures late last year that Lincoln Group paid Iraqi publications to run one-sided stories by American soldiers, has been completed but not made public, military officials said.

A spokesman for General Casey, Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, declined to comment on Lincoln Group, citing the ongoing investigation.

In interviews, Mr. Bailey, 30, and Mr. Craig, 31, said they had succeeded by anticipating the military's need for help communicating with and influencing the Iraqi public, just as the insurgency was building.

"We saw that it was very hard for the U.S. to do that work," Mr. Bailey said.

"They didn't do media and outreach very well."

"We had local offices in a tough environment where traditional U.S. contractors would not operate."


He disputed suggestions that Lincoln had experienced difficulty delivering on work for the military, saying the firm had "successfully executed" more than 20 contracts from the Defense Department.

Lincoln's roster of advisers and other businesses assisting it has continually changed, Mr. Craig said, because "our work in often hostile environments has occasionally proved to be too risky or challenging for some of our partners."

Little in Mr. Bailey's background indicated he would end up doing propaganda work in Iraq.

Born in Britain as Christian Jozefowicz, he changed his name when he graduated from Oxford University and moved to San Francisco during the late-1990's dot-com boom.

There he founded or advised several companies and plunged into the Silicon Valley social scene, according to Mr. Bailey and several friends and former business associates.

Among the companies were Express Action, a company that planned to develop an Internet service to calculate duties on overseas purchases, and Motion Power, which intended to invent a shoe that would generate its own electrical power to run portable consumer devices.

"You would have been proud had you seen this 23-year-old kid pitching, with no product, no customers, no business plan," Mr. Bailey wrote in a letter to Mr. Peña, describing how he raised $15 million from investors for Express Action.


Mr. Bailey later moved to New York and sought investors for an investment fund, according to documents filed with the National Futures Association.

In 2003, he moved to Washington.

Mr. Craig's path to the capital began when he dropped out of West Point to pursue, he says, his interests in business and national security.

Enlisting in the Marines in 1995, he began working in military intelligence.

He earned an undergraduate degree in information technology while stationed in Okinawa and Australia through the University of Maryland and a masters in business administration from National University, which runs academic programs on military bases.

He left the Marines in 2000.

By 2004, Mr. Bailey had moved into Mr. Craig's house near downtown Washington, and the two had formed the company that eventually became Lincoln Group.

Their original goal was to make money exploiting Iraq's most obvious surplus — its shattered infrastructure.

But those efforts faltered.

A project to export scrap metal fell apart after the Iraqi government banned scrap exports in 2004, Mr. Bailey said.

A pile of scrap metal, purchased with a loan from an Indonesian bank, has been sitting in Basra ever since, according to two ex-employees.

Like several other former Lincoln workers, they asked to remain anonymous because they had signed confidentiality agreements with the company or still dealt with the firm.

Lincoln also spent about $50,000 for two portable brick-making machines from Texas.

The company had hoped to set up a brick plant near Mosul, where the demand for construction materials was vast, according to a presentation Mr. Bailey made to potential investors in Dubai.

The machines, though, were principally designed for homeowners or small contractors.

Lincoln would not comment on the project.

Eventually, Lincoln began working with the American military, which was spending millions on contractors for a broad range of services.

The firm rented a one-story house inside the Green Zone, the heavily fortified government compound in central Baghdad.

Furnished with two sofas and a sheet of plywood that served as a desk, the house had a single telephone and an overloaded electrical outlet.

Lincoln formed a partnership with The Rendon Group, a Washington company with close ties to the Bush administration, and won a $5 million Pentagon contract to help inform Iraqis about the American-led effort to defeat the insurgency and form a new government.

One contract requirement was to get Iraqi publications to run articles written by the military, according to several ex-Lincoln employees.

Rendon soon dropped out and Lincoln handled the contract alone.


But the company had fewer than two dozen workers and little experience with public relations, according to several ex-employees.

Problems arose from the start.

In a 2004 briefing to the military, Lincoln conceded that it was "not yet fully staffed" and that "media monitoring software" required by the contract was "not ready."

And the government did not provide that much work at first.

The military's public affairs office produced only a few articles a day during that period, one Lincoln ex-employee said.

A small State Department contract to assist small businesses had just been cancelled, he said, and the firm was having difficulty making its payroll.

Lincoln lacked the armored vehicles or security guards employed by more established contractors.

When venturing outside the Green Zone, employees would grab weapons and climb into one of two beat-up Proton sedans, which employees were told were chosen to blend in with dilapidated Iraqi vehicles on the streets.

After winning a small contract from the Marines to do polling, the company hired Iraqis to go door-to-door in Anbar Province with questionnaires.

To protect themselves from possible insurgent reprisals, they were told to say they were working for an Iraqi university, according to a former Lincoln employee.

Last August, gunmen came to the home of one of the Iraqi workers, killing him and three others, according to an ex- employee.

Mr. Bailey said it was not clear whether the killing was related to the polling, but the company decided to move a Lincoln office staffed by Iraqis in downtown Baghdad to a less noticeable location.

Back in the United States, Mr. Bailey and Mr. Craig worked to drum up more business.

In late 2004, Mr. Craig traveled to Fort Bragg, N.C., to meet with officers of the 18th Airborne Corps, which was preparing take over management of Lincoln's public affairs contract in Iraq, according to a former employee and company documents.

Despite the problems with the existing work, Lincoln said it could assist the military in the more secretive realm of "information operations," according to a transcript of the briefing.

Unlike public affairs work, information operations are meant to influence and help defeat foreign adversaries, using deception, if necessary.


The briefing also touted the firm's "strategic advisers," including Mr. Santamaria, the former Marine officer, who received a master's degree from the Wharton business school and was co-author of a business book called "The Marine Corps Way."

Mr. Santamaria said he reviewed several investment proposals for Lincoln during a two-week association in late 2004.

But after becoming "concerned about their methods," he said, "I severed ties with them as quickly as I could."

A Lincoln spokesman, William Dixon, said "it was a mistake" to include Mr. Santamaria's name in the December briefing because he was no longer affiliated with the company.

Lincoln may simply have been following another principle taught by Mr. Peña.

"How do you create an instant track record?" Mr. Peña says he told Mr. Bailey.

"You joint-venture with someone who has a track record."

Early last summer, military commanders made Lincoln Group the main civilian contractor for carrying out an aggressive propaganda campaign in Anbar Province, known as the Western Mission project.

Over the next several months, the military transferred tens of millions of dollars to Lincoln for the project, records show.


The company hired dozens of employees, including academics and former military personnel, as well as hundreds of contract workers in Iraq and elsewhere, a number that fluctuates by contract requirements, according to Mr. Dixon, the Lincoln spokesman.

With the new duties came substantial new requirements, including producing television and radio ads, buying newspaper ads and placing many more articles in the Iraqi press.

The military also approved paying Iraqi editors to run stories, according to ex-Lincoln employees.

Lincoln also enlisted the New York advertising executive Jerry Della Femina, chairman of Della Femina Rothschild Jeary & Partners.

Mr. Della Femina said he was introduced to Mr. Craig last spring by a Washington lobbyist.

Mr. Della Femina said his firm "did a great deal of work" on advertising ideas for Lincoln to present to the military's Special Operations Command, which last summer was soliciting bids for contracts, potentially worth millions, for psychological operations.

Lincoln listed Mr. Della Femina as a "creative director" in materials presented last spring at a meeting with Special Operations officers in Tampa.

But Mr. Della Femina said his firm pulled out before executing any of the ideas.

Three months after ending the collaboration, Mr. Della Femina said, he discovered that Lincoln's Web site listed him as one of its partners.

"I was surprised that they had our name on their Web site in the first place," he said.

After he asked that his name be removed, Mr. Craig said, "we honored his request within the week."

By that time, Lincoln had already been notified by Special Operations Command that it and two other companies had been chosen to compete for work under the contract.

Lincoln later told Special Operations Command that one of its principal subcontractors was Omnicom Group Inc. of New York, an advertising and marketing conglomerate.

A proposal signed by Mr. Bailey in October said Lincoln "has exploited the extensive experience and expertise of the Omnicom Group."

But Pat Sloan, an Omnicom spokeswoman, said she could find no evidence it has ever worked with Lincoln Group.

"We're not aware of any relationship with Lincoln Group," she said.


She noted that Omnicom had once owned 49 percent of Mr. Della Femina's agency but had sold the stake in early 2005.

Michael J. Jeary, president of Mr. Della Femina's agency, said Lincoln's claim of Omnicom as a subcontractor was an "honest mistake" because he had never told the firm Omnicom had sold its minority stake.

Although Lincoln Group's work in Iraq is now under scrutiny in two Pentagon investigations, the firm is hunting for more government work.

Last month, Mr. Bailey attended a going-away reception at the Virginia condominium of a mid-level government employee on her way to a new job at the American Embassy in Baghdad.

Her job: overseeing contracts.
Snuffysmith
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/horton.php?articleid=8556

As Long as We're Talking About the Constitution…
Why not read it?
by Scott Horton
"In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution."
- Thomas Jefferson

All over the country, and even in the press, the U.S. Constitution is being discussed in regards to the president's war powers. This is apparently a side benefit of having an empire so corrupt and murderous that many folks are considering impeaching and removing the president who lied us into war and claims unlimited authority to wiretap, kidnap, torture, and murder whomever he likes – his lawyers even insist that the "commander in chief" has the "inherent" and "plenary" authority to crush a child's testicles to get at the boy's father. (Really. Click here to read all about it.)

The Constitution is not holy writ, but the government it describes would be a hell of a lot better than the one we have now.

It is a commonly held fallacy that the president of the United States has unlimited authority over this country's foreign policy. What authority does the Constitution grant the president in this regard? Well, he is to retain civilian supremacy over the military "when called into the actual service of the United States," and he can negotiate treaties that have no authority whatsoever unless and until ratified by a super-majority of the U.S. Senate. That's it. There is nothing else.

Congress holds "all legislative powers," according to the first sentence of the first section of Article One.

One could argue, as Thomas Jefferson did, that the spirit and letter of the Constitution has been corrupted since the first Washington administration, when the president accepted Alexander Hamilton's view that the new government could do anything not expressly forbidden by the Constitution and signed the law creating the second Bank of the United States – an act that caused Jefferson to resign his position as secretary of state. Even accepting Hamilton's false premise, as every generation since then has, it is apparent that precisely what is considered forbidden by the Constitution has been about as fluid as George Washington's interpretation of it and the whims of various politicians in the years since.

No where is this clearer than in the record of America's wars. Of the five wars that were actually declared by the Congress, as required by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11, not one was defensive. The war of 1812-14 was the result of Jefferson and Madison's perfectly constitutional, yet economically and politically suicidal, trade war against Britain. James Madison, the Constitution's principal author, chose to take an aggressive posture against Britain (while, of course, playing the victim), and succeeded only in getting the Capitol burned to the ground and making Andrew Jackson (who would go on to centralize more authority in the presidency) into a war hero.

It's too bad Madison ignored his own advice on how to keep the government limited. In 1795, he had argued that America should do its best to avoid foreign conflicts since,

"[O]f all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few."

The war against Mexico (in which half of that country was stolen) was provoked by U.S. troops as soon as possible after Texas' entry to the Union. Congress was "notified," that is, lied to, and declared war after the fact, to the infernal consternation of a congressman from Illinois named Abraham Lincoln. After gaining the presidency for himself, Lincoln turned around and provoked the first shots of the Civil War by sending troops to occupy Ft. Sumter, a tax-collection post in the bay of a state that had declared its independence. According to Thomas DiLorenzo, Lincoln "wrote to his naval commander Gustavus Fox thanking him for his assistance in drawing the first shot." Congress never did declare war, only that the war the president had started was for the purpose of "preserving the union" – months later.

By the time the Civil War was over, the idea that anything could limit the powers of the federal government was gone forever. The final step from a limited constitutional republic to a single nation-state had been taken – the union had become the nation – the united States, plural, replaced forever by the United States, singular. The right of people to secede from what they consider to be an illegitimate government, articulated so clearly in the Declaration of Independence, had been replaced by the president's prerogative to conquer them by violent force. (Yes, private slavery is also wrong.)

As soon as the settlement of the West, and the near extermination of the American Indians, was complete, the American empire went looking for foreign colonies to conquer. Apparently, the step between post-constitutional "statehood" and empire wasn't quite as far as the step from republic to nation-state. Hawaii was taken at 40-inch gun point in 1893.

(Throughout all this is a history of violent intervention in Central and South America that defies imagination.)


The "splendid little" Spanish-American war of 1898, which William Graham Sumner argued actually resulted in the U.S. being conquered by Spain, was sold to the people and the Congress as a defensive response to Spanish sabotage of the battleship Maine – which was, of course, a lie. "Acquired" were Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines– where a brutal "anti-insurgency" campaign took the lives of hundreds of thousands, all in the name of "liberation." There was no constitutional provision for how to suppress insurrections by the subjects of foreign colonies, so the Marines just improvised.

With the arrival of the butcher Woodrow Wilson, favorite of American court historians and thus of state-educated folks everywhere, came a whole "New Freedom," which included mass arrests, deportations, jailing of dissenters, and all the other staples of a totalitarian reign of terror. He had already invaded Mexico, Nicaragua, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic – all without just cause or congressional declaration – before lying the U.S. into World War I. The suspicious sinking of the Lusitania, a ship full of civilians (and unbeknownst to them, munitions for British forces fighting the Kaiser), was not enough to convince the American people to get involved in the "Great War" in Europe, but when the people were shown an intercepted message known as the Zimmerman Telegram, which showed Germany's offer of an alliance with Mexico in the event of war with the United States and a promise to help them retake the American Southwest, opinion against Germany hit a fever pitch. How Germany could help Mexico retake New Mexico and Arizona when they couldn't conquer France, England, or Russia was never explained, but it was enough, and Wilson got his declaration of war.

America's entry into World War I set the 20th century on a course of death and totalitarianism. As described by Jim Powell in Wilson's War: How Woodrow Wilson's Great Blunder Led to Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and World War II, due to Wilson's interference, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin and Paul Wolfowitz's hero, Leon Trotsky, were able to seize power in Russia and create the Soviet Union, and the French and British were able to so humiliate the Germans as to assure the rise of the Nazi death machine.

Between Wilson and his fascist spawn, Franklin Roosevelt, there was an attempted "return to normalcy," but the incredible consolidation of state power during the Wilson years was far too extensive to be undone, and the Republican administrations of Coolidge, Harding, and Hoover were hardly in a hurry to undo Wilson's gains. After all, he had just been emulating their conservative socialism.

By the time Franklin Roosevelt and Harry "Lucky" Truman were through, the Constitution was nothing but pretty calligraphy on parchment for folks to reminisce about on the Fourth of July. Through various states of national emergency, the wholesale rewriting of the interstate commerce clause by the courts, and America's participation in WWII (another war in which the American people were deceived into thinking that our intervention was defensive in nature, though their sons were conscripted when that still wasn't good enough), Washington, D.C., had permanently established itself as the center of economic and political power in the United States. Garet Garrett called it Ex-America way back then: a massive warfare/welfare/regulatory/national security state, the final reduction of the several states to the status of large counties under "federal" control, a permanent military-industrial complex, and the inheritance of all the Western empires, plus Japan's. War could now be declared by the president or the United Nations Security Council. The Constitution was no longer amended when politicians decided they needed more power – they just went ahead. The rule of law was dead.

It is impossible to have a limited constitutional republic in a state of perpetual war. Since WWII, the Right has agitated for more foreign conflict – a government's most effective means of expanding its control – while the Left has sung J.P. Morgan's song of good democratic government and pushed for the disregard of the limits the law places on the actions of the state. As the historians Gabriel Kolko and Murray Rothbard have shown, the push for "progressive" government regulation of business in the years before World War I and during the Great Depression was led by the big businesses that were to be regulated. They had decided that competing over control of congressmen was easier than competing in a free market. The Left bought it, and continues to. When the Republicans are in charge, the Left is mad at them for "not doing enough." When Democrats are in power, the Left openly laments that our government doesn't interfere in people's lives quite as much as in Europe. Even the most atrocious and aggressive wars are sometimes praised by liberals, who, believing wholeheartedly in the benevolent power of the state to order the domestic sphere, carry that faith over into "humanitarian" and "peacekeeping" roles for the U.S. military around the world. Enumerated powers? Never heard of such a thing.

The Cold War – a neat euphemism for 40 years of constant fear and warmongering – required even those most dedicated to markets and the rule of law to accept a "totalitarian bureaucracy on our shores," according to the court intellectuals, as the military fought its proxy wars and the CIA installed its dictators overseas. As the Cold War was winding down, the National Security Council was preparing to scrap the Constitution altogether and create a military dictatorship, as detailed in the Miami Herald on July 5, 1987.

When the Soviet menace imploded, the U.S. government created and found new enemies here and abroad to fight in the name of ending the distribution of illegal drugs and stopping aggressive war, beginning with Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, which American diplomats had, of course, invited.

It is easy to see why the politicians lie us into all these conflicts: Americans don't want empire and never have. We have continued to believe in the traditions of our nation's founders, who led a successful rebellion against an empire and created in its place, at least they claimed, just enough government to protect our rights. When the politicians send our families off to war, they must always call it "liberation" and "defending freedom" against the forces of malevolent tyrants in order to disguise our empire's truly aggressive nature.

With the "war on terror," we see the brutal face of the $2.5 trillion per year government that has been created in this land, supposedly under this Constitution, in the name of all these good works. Halliburton – which has done such a great job with the ghost prisons overseas – has now been awarded the contract to build domestic concentration camps. In the event of a "Red Alert," we may very well see the Department of Homeland Security fulfill its destiny as the American National Police Force; the repeal (or reinterpretation out of existence) of posse comitatus; and the deployment of the military's new Northern Command over the people of this once-free land.

Some may try to pretend that the U.S. has become like the Soviet Union "allofasudden," under the corrupt direction of recent leaders, but the truth is that our government has been turning into this imperial leviathan for generations, while the citizenry has bought every lie and cheered it on. It has taken the blundering stupidity and ruthlessness of this recent gang to make people see what's happened – and now it may be too late to do anything about it.

There's one course left open, and that is the election of the House of Representative every two years. (Look out, they're trying to destroy that, too.) All bills for raising and appropriating revenue must originate in the House. They finally ended the Vietnam War by refusing to continue paying for it.

The U.S. Constitution provides us with the mechanism to completely purge our government without bloodshed – and we may not have many chances left. We could, theoretically, in this year's primary elections, send the machine candidates in both parties home and completely purge the House of Representatives (current reelection rate 99 percent). But will the choice between republic or empire be on the ballot in 2006?
Livyjr
Good morning, Snuffysmith .....

I just finished reading this post above ...

And as always ...

It left me with some thoughts and impressions ....

Which I am still mulling over, to be truthful .....

And it is interesting how this post fits in to an evolving "train of thought" that I have been having ...

Along the same lines ....

This "flow" from a Republic of individual states to this CORRUPT TYRANNICAL EMPIRE that we find ourselves in today ....

In here, I "style" myself as a student of history ...

Because in reality ...

Out there, in the non-BLOG-O-SPHERIC reality, I am a "student of history" .....

It is just something that I do ...

On my own ...

For my own reasons ...

BUT ...

Since one of those reasons is CITIZENSHIP ...

That makes my studies relevant in here ...

If I can have them be so ...

And my point of view, in counterpoint to this author's views above ...

Is that what is visited down on us by what purports to be OUR OWN GOVERNMENT ....

IS OUR OWN FAULT ....

If we have this CORRUPT TRAVESTY of a government today here in OUR America ...

It is because we have abdicated on what OUR citizenship responsibilities demand of us ...

And we have done that too many days in a row ....

Until now ...

We are here ....

Has a die really been cast?

A study of history says yes ...

And no ....

Yes, because, obviously ...

We are here, regardless of where we might have wanted to be ...

And no ...

Because nothing, including the EMPIRE OF ROME, lasts forever ...

As I have said before, I am a combat veteran ...

And so ..

Perhaps my mind is indeed altered ....

I study the past ...

But I am not at all obsessed by it ...

Since like the bullet that just went whinging by your head ...

IT IS GONE ...

The bullet that goes by is never the one to kill you ..

And so ...

And I am not overly concerned about the future, either ....

Whether it be doom and gloom ...

Or not ...

Because no one can say for sure what that future will be ...

And so ...

My concerns are right now ....

Regardless of how good or bad life around me seems ....

And that is why I try hard to put some thought into my words in here ....

Because here is where change has to start ....

If a train is coming roaring down the tracks ...

And you want to divert it ...

To avoid a calamity further down the line ....

Then you have to find a switch ...

And you have to throw that switch in time to divert that on-coming train over onto a different track ....

And if you can't .....

Well, let's just say for the moment that we will not consider that second option overlong in here, for the moment, at least ....

And so ....
Livyjr
QUOTE(Livyjr @ Feb 17 2006, 08:00 AM)
If we have this CORRUPT TRAVESTY of a government today here in OUR America ...

It is because we have abdicated on what OUR citizenship responsibilities demand of us ...

And we have done that too many days in a row ....

Until now ...

We are here ....

A funny thing occurs when people get lost in the woods ....

They begin to run ....

Even though they don't know where they are ....

If you are lost ...

And you don't know where you are ...

You should stop and rest and think for a moment about how you got to that spot ...

But people don't do that ....

When the thought comes into their head that they are lost ...

People don't look backwards for their own trail in to that spot ...

Which has to exist ...

Unless you floated down on a parachute, or something ....

To the contrary ...

People panic ....

And so ...

They run looking for the exit ....

Never realizing that it was right behind them, all the time ....

"Tension Between Doctors, Free Clinics Rise"

By MICHAEL KUNZELMAN, Associated Press Writer

Thu Feb 16, 3:37 AM ET

LONG BEACH, Miss. - When Clifton Davis hurt his eye recently, he went to a free medical clinic in this hurricane-wrecked community.

For Davis, and others with health insurance, getting free care is easier than figuring out if regular doctors are still around.


"I don't even know who's open," said Davis, a 49-year-old landscaper.

"Everything got torn up by the storm."

Nearly six months after Katrina, there are still a half dozen free clinics in coastal Mississippi seeing hundreds of patients a day.

At the same time, hundreds of doctors whose offices were destroyed are struggling to rebuild their practices.

Some complain that jump-starting their businesses will be tougher as long as clinics are providing free care and free medicine.

"We are very appreciative of what they've done, but it's time to move on," said Dr. Douglas Lanier, who treats kidney diseases at Memorial Hospital in Gulfport.


The Long Beach clinic is one of the region's largest, with several doctors treating around 170 patients a day.

Under a big tent set up in an Episcopal school's parking lot, patients wait on folding chairs and school desks.

Doctors use picnic tables for desks and examine patients in areas screened off by plastic tarps.

For patients with no insurance and no transportation, the clinics often are the only option, said Jennifer Knight, a registered nurse who serves as the Long Beach clinic's medical services director.

Knight estimates about half her patients either have insurance or lost coverage after Katrina.

She said she's aware of the resentment of some local doctors.


"My answer to that is, 'Come to the area and open your office.'"

"... It's not my pleasure to serve people in a tent."

"It's not optimal care."

Her clinic is the target of fewer complaints, she says, because the staff includes some local doctors — and they're getting paid for their work.

Some of the visiting physicians at the clinic were sponsored by out-of-state institutions.

Others came on their own.

Some stay a day or two, others remain for as long as two or three weeks.

Many have used vacation time.

Catherine May, a psychiatrist with a private practice in Washington, D.C., said she relished the chance to apply her training in emergency medicine and came on her own.

"They needed the help," May said.

"I also find the work intensely gratifying and interesting."

In less than two weeks, Knight plans to merge her clinic with a nearby medical center, Coastal Family Health, and operate out of a trailer instead of a tent.

Many patients will continue to get free care, but others will be charged according to their ability to pay, she said.

Tension between local doctors and the free clinics is more pronounced in Bay St. Louis, which before Katrina wrecked it was a quaint resort town about 40 miles east of New Orleans.

Less than three-quarters of Bay St. Louis' pre-Katrina population of 8,200 has returned.

The Virginia-based Loudoun Medical Group opened a free clinic in the historic train depot.

Despite complaints from some area doctors, city officials have asked the group to stay until April.


Harold "Buz" Olsen, the city's community and economic development director, said between 40 and 80 patients a day visit the clinic for a variety of injuries and illnesses, including the nagging respiratory ailment locals have taken to calling "Katrina crud."

"It fills a need."

"It really does," Olsen said of the clinic.

"This is a place that's helping those who don't have the wherewithal to pay."

A day after Katrina demolished his Bay St. Louis office, Dr. James Crittenden raised a tent in his parking lot and started treating patients — both those who could pay and those who couldn't.

His income has dropped around 40 percent since the storm, but the internist said he views free care as an investment, not just a public service.

Still, he wants local doctors providing the care — not the clinic.

"The only way we can get back up and running is to put the patients back in the system, whether they're free or paying," Crittenden said.

Faith-based groups run many of the free clinics, including one at Bethel Lutheran Church in Biloxi, farther east on Mississippi's coast.

Judy Bultman, who worked at a Veterans Affairs hospital in Gulfport that was leveled by Katrina, now spends her days managing the clinic.

Many of the patients who visit her clinic are newly unemployed but have annual incomes that disqualify them from Medicare, she said.

Those patients, she added, wouldn't help pay private doctors' bills.

"I'm not doing battle with anybody to keep this clinic open," she said.

"We're trying to respond to the needs, the unmet needs, of the people."

Dr. Rowe Crowder downplays the friction between local physicians and the free clinics.

Still, the 41-year-old internist has grave doubts about staying in his native Bay St. Louis.

At least once a day, he fields a phone call or e-mail from a recruiter dangling a job that would take him far from the devastation.

The offers tempt Crowder, who lost his home and two offices to Katrina.

These days, Crowder lives in a donated trailer home and treats patients in another trailer parked outside Hancock Medical Center in Bay St. Louis.

He works for the hospital now, earning a salary less than half of what he made before the hurricane.

"Going to work for the hospital was a way for me to stay here and be part of the rebuilding," said Crowder, whose post-Katrina office attire often includes an untucked polo shirt, shorts and sockless loafers.

"But I'm not in a position to do a kamikaze run and wipe myself out financially."
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.