QUOTE(Jothika @ Nov 18 2004, 06:09 PM)
How did it get FDA approval at all, then? You must admit, though that article didn't, that Bush has a definite agenda against the
abortion pill.
And I don't think that it is so much motivated by concern for our health as it is for the contentment of his constituency.
It actually languished for some time, mired in politics, before approval was begrudgingly granted. This drug had to pass higher hurdles of patient exposure than most and has a relatively decent safety profile considering the circumstances of it's use and the high dose of adjunct therapy (misoprostol).
Many of the serious adverse events reported with the combination occurred in women who had additional risks (i.e., smoking). While the risks associated with it's use have been overblown by the moral majority, I wouldn't be so dismissive with an "everybody knows it's safe" quip - women who use this method of abortion should
not be alone for the first few days after use and whoever is with them needs to be a responsible adult, know what is going on, what the patient needs to avoid (e.g. aspirin) & what signs and symptoms to look for.
As for the references to safety in ectopic pregnancy, people need to consider the dangers inherent in ectopic pregnancy in and of itself. Reputable healthcare providers do exams and ultrasounds to ensure they can see an embryo in the uterus that is at least 7 weeks in gestation. If your HCG is indicative of pregnancy and they don't see/feel what they expect to see, they'll start working you up to rule out ectopic pregnancy or molar pregnancy, etc.