Group Cites Electronic Voting Problems
AP - 45 minutes ago
The record use of electronic voting machines on Nov. 2 led to hundreds of voting irregularities and shows the need for higher standards, a voting rights group said Thursday.

The companies that make the electronic machines said their equipment was reliable and had relatively few problems considering the millions who cast their ballots.

The Election Verification Project reviewed nearly 900 reports of electronic voting problems on Election Day, ranging from lost votes in North Carolina to miscounted votes in Ohio and breakdowns in New Orleans that caused long lines and shut down polling places.

"The documented problems with touch screen machines, vote-counting irregularities and the fact that votes cannot be verified or recounted show us how vulnerable our democracy will be in the future when there are disputed or unclear results," said Kim Alexander, a project member and president of the California Voter Foundation.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...ectronic_voting

I still hold to my opinion that we have not yet found evidence of voter fraud, and we might never find it.  But, the one thing that is fact is that some of the machines produce NO paper-trail.  THAT is a very big problem!

When we do find the fraud, bross--will your very soul simply explode?

Curious.  I mean, you have waged QUITE the battle!

When we do find the fraud, bross--will your very soul simply explode?

Curious.  I mean, you have waged QUITE the battle!

Now, now... He's getting better. He can't deny the diebold system is bunk any longer, stopped trying to call Bev a wacko...

A couple of more days and we may make a liberal out of him 

What is the difference between idealistic and realistic?

Can one pursue both simultaneously?  Absolutely.

Actually I meant that we can attack the election process both backwardly (idealistically) and forwardly (realistically) at the same time, because both ways are important to us.