1. Harry Potter was written with the intention of making young minds think about black magic etc in a nice light.
2. Holy Blood Holy Grail was written to make people believe that Jesus did not die on the cross but went on to live somewhere in Europe and have a family who became the European Royals. Am I right?
3. Anyone critical of the official history of the Jewish holocaust is jailed. And the bishops bless the jailers. Whereas they say nothing much about 4.
4. The Da Vinci Code, although a fiction, is based on the above Holy Blood book which is sold as 'fact'. It too claims Jesus did not die on the cross but lived on to marry and have children I believe.
5. The courtcase. The Da Vinci Code is accused of stealing ideas from the factual book and this gives us endless more publicity about the roots of Jesus' 'family in Europe'.
6. Some of the evidence that Jesus went to England is the hymn 'Jerusalem' which was written by an Arch Druid, though this fact is not advertised. William Blake.
7. The Glastonbury legend about Jesus going to England claims he went at the age of 12 with his uncle Joseph of Arimethia. The Christians do not really believe this story but it does nothing to alter the later years of Jesus life, so they do not object.
8. The conspiracy theories are many and varied.
Jesus did not die, someone else did. Simon of Cyrene is in the lead for this position.
'Crucifixion' took place, but it was not what we all think, and was really symbolic.
Jesus was crucified but he survived to go on to live in England.
There are probably more out there but I have not spent much time on this conspiracy, I am only writing what I know about.
St Paul was a Roman agent, for some purpose or other.
Comments:
If they had one conspiracy theory that you could really get your teeth into it would be easier to refute it. But they have many. If you refute one, they come up with another. So it is a pointless task. And in the end the Jesuits are in charge of history and they are known liars, and also, to make matters more complicated many of their websites are infected with a Freemason virus.
The dA-Vinci story is interesting because it relies on Leonardo da Vinci. Notice how I wrote da Vinci. It is not a name anyway, it means 'from Vinci' and most experts would never refer to the artist by the place he came from without his name. It is advertised all over Tokyo with the cross bar of the A missing. The A and the V are in red and the other letters in white, so it looks like two pyramids, one inverted. This is just funny, not very important. But the signs that Dan Brown writes about are supposed to be secret information the artist had about Jesus not being divine. True, there are these signs in some of the paintings, and I found out that one is a finger pointing to Heaven. The artist sometimes did two copies of a painting at different dates. It is funny that all the paintings with the signals in them came after he was sponsored by a now extinct family, the Sforza family from Milan. They also sponsored Mozart, and we know that Mozart was supported by the Freemasons, that is how he managed to survive because the rich people who he wrote music for would rarely pay up.
I just thought these bits of information ought to be out there and not locked away from view.
I am a bit troubled that one week a Christian friend told me that it may be just as well if we go with the story that Jesus was not divine. That was hardly a surprise as she was not a Catholic and she is Japanese, her knowledge of things Christian was not very deep. However the next week I discovered that a professor of theology has been teaching the same thing to would-be priests ie. that it does not really MATTER anyway. That redemption does not rely on the old story. Oh well. I leave it to you to decide for yourself. I wonder why the bishops remain silent. I am not saying that it matters to you non-believers out there. It doesn't. But perhaps there are some believers who are easily fooled into accepting the latest trends without bothering to figure out if there might not be an agenda behind it: to undermine Christianity from within.
Of course, the fact that the Shrub pretends to be Christian and acting in the name of Christ is more damaging than any of the above, what with torture being legal etc. He may in fact still be thinking back to his days in Skull and Bones and recalling promises he made to whoever they worshipped back then.
One wonders why The Da Vinci Code was given such great publicity, as well as Harry Potter, when there are numerous books that are still best sellers and get virtually no publicity. What gives? Why the attention on Dan Brown and Harry Potter?
Then I have a problem with the New American Version of the bible. I only noticed this in the mass readings for 23 April and 1 John 5:1-5. If you compare that message (conquering the world for Christ) to the other numerous translations (we have already overcome worldliness through Jesus' death on the cross) they are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
