IRAQIS TAKE NOTE OF ELECTION RESULTS AND RUMSFELD RESIGNATION - CHRISTOPHER BODEE, ASSOCIATED PRESS (NORTH COUNTY TIMES, NOVEMBER 9) Many Iraqis say the U.S.-led forces failed to offer day-to-day protection against insurgent and militia attacks.
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/11/09...2_0511_8_06.txt
"JUBA RETURNS," AND OTHER SNUFF FILMS FROM IRAQ: THE WAR OF THE SNIPERS - PATRICK COCKBURN (COUNTERPUNCH, NOVEMBER 9): The most recent Islamic Army propaganda video is about a black-masked man identified as "Juba," the Baghdad Sniper" and shows him prowling Baghdad in search for unwary American troops. Snipers have always fascinated film makers, propagandists and the general public because they personalize men making war.
http://www.counterpunch.org/patrick11092006.html
BAGHDAD SAYS 150,000 IRAQIS KILLED - IRAQI HEALTH MINISTER ALI AL-SHAMMARI TODAY SAID VIOLENCE OVER THE PAST THREE AND A HALF YEARS HAS KILLED SOME 150,000 IRAQIS (RFE/RL, NOVEMBER 9)
http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/...d5bd6cf5ef.html
HOW SECURITY GUARDS BECAME KILLERS - DAHR JAMAIL AND ALI AL-FADHILY (ASIA TIMES, NOVEMBER 10): One of the first decisions that the US occupation authorities and the Iraqi leaders working with them made was that each ministry could establish its own protection force independent of the control of the ministries of Interior and Defense.
http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HK10Ak01.html
A STAGGERING NEW BILL FOR IRAQ? - JESSICA HOLZER AND MATTHEW SWIBEL (FORBES, NOVEMBER 9): The U.S. armed services have requested a $160 billion supplemental appropriation to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in the remainder of fiscal year 2007 -- a staggering amount.
http://www.forbes.com/2006/11/08/iraq-appr...aily_newsletter
INCOMPLETE JUSTICE IN IRAQ - EDITORIAL (BOSTON GLOBE, NOVEMBER 8): If Iraqi authorities allow Saddam to be executed before his major crimes can be documented and judged in open court, they will be undermining the primary purpose of a tribunal that they wanted, understandably, to conduct in Iraq -- where the despot's Iraqi victims were disappeared, tortured, raped, and killed.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial...in_iraq?mode=PF
BUSH'S NOVEMBER SURPRISE - ROBERT SCHEER (TRUTHDIG, NOVEMBER 8/COMMON DREAMS): A fair international tribunal judging Hussein's many crimes would have provided a venue for exposing the tyrants international backers, led by the United States and its allies.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1108-25.htm
A DUBIOUS VERDICT - RICHARD FALK (INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE, NOVEMBER 7/COMMON DREAMS): The outcome of this first trial against Saddam's Baathist regime should have been internationalized, or at the very least, waited until normalcy had been restored in Iraq.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1107-21.htm
WHY HUSSEIN ULTIMATELY WINS, AND DIES A MARTYR: IN AN INTERNATIONAL COURT, HIS TRIAL WOULD HAVE HAD CREDIBILITY. THE TRIAL IN IRAQ DID NOT - GWYNNE DYER (THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, NOVEMBER 7/COMMON DREAMS)
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1107-24.htm
SADDAM VERDICT A PYRRHIC VICTORY FOR BUSH - RICHARD GWYN (TORONTO STAR, NOVEMBER 7/COMMON DREAMS): Saddam will die a martyr. And martyrs are always remembered.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1107-25.htm
NO CONFIDENCE IN BUSH - SCOT LEHIGH (BOSTON GLOBE, NOVEMBER 8): As for the decision to invade Iraq in the first place, Americans have decided it was a mistake.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial...in_bush?mode=PF
POST MORTEM: WHY REPUBLICANS GOT SHELLACKED IN THE MIDTERMS - FRED BARNES (WEEKLY STANDARD, NOVEMBER 8): Republicans lost the House and probably the Senate because of Iraq, corruption, and a record of taking up big issues and then doing nothing on them. Of these, the war was by far the biggest factor.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Publ...12/923kemje.asp
AND NOW, IRAQ - DAVID CORN (NATION, NOVEMBER 9): The bitterly fought Congressional election was merely the prelude to the real showdown in Washington: the battle over the Iraq War.
http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20061127&s=corn
THE TABLE TURNS: AMERICAN VOTERS SAY, "BUSH SUCKS!" COUNTERPUNCH - SUSAN BLOCK (COUNTERPUNCH, NOVEMBER 8): The election was a referendum on the flabbergastingly evil reign of George II, the craven Bushites and the putrid, crony-riddled, page-diddling, mostly Republican War Machine.
http://www.counterpunch.org/block11082006.html
THE NATION'S NEW WARRIOR - EDITORIAL (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, NOVEMBER 9): Most Americans want changes in the government's approach to the Iraq war. Americans want to prevail in Iraq.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion...newsopinion-hed
IRAQ WINS THE ELECTION, WHAT NOW? - TOM HAYDEN (COMMON DREAMS, NOVEMBER 8): American voters insisted on changing course, and let Iraq become the critical factor in overthrowing a rigged Republican majority.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1108-32.htm
ONLY A MINOR EARTHQUAKE - CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER (WASHINGTON POST, NOVEMBER 10): The election was not so much the war itself as the perceived administration policy of "stay the course," which implied endless intervention with no victory in sight.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0901775_pf.html
ON MIDTERMS, MANDATES, AND MURTHA - ARIANNA HUFFINGTON (HUFFINGTON POST, NOVEMBER 8): The GOP lost for three reasons: Iraq, Iraq, and Iraq. Period. End of discussion.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huff...an_b_33647.html
THE IRAQ WAR ELECTION - JOHN NICHOLS (NATION, NOVEMBER 8/COMMON DREAMS): The anti-war message won.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1108-24.htm
MEETING AT THE MIDDLE - E. J. DIONNE JR. (WASHINGTON POST, NOVEMBER 9): Tuesday's vote can make clear to the Iraqi government that there is a limit to American patience. The Shiite majority in Iraq must take more steps to reconcile with the Sunni minority.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...6110802080.html
WINDS OF RAGE, WINDS OF CHANGE - JOAN VENNOCHI (BOSTON GLOBE, NOVEMBER 9): The real message of the election is something less than a call for immediate withdrawal. But voters clearly want to begin the process of extricating this country from Iraq.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial..._change?mode=PF
SANTORUM GONE! POMBO GONE! BURNS GONE! RUMSFELD GONE!: COUNT YOUR BLESSINGS: NEOCONS AND NEOLIBS TAKE A BIG HIT, AS VOTERS SAY NO TO BUSH, WAR AND FREE TRADE - ALEXANDER COCKBURN AND JEFFREY ST. CLAIR (COUNTERPUNCH, NOVEMBER 8): The voters want the US out of Iraq.
http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn11082006.html
IT'S OVER FOR BUSH - EDITORIAL (NATION, NOVEMBER 9): Americans want out of this disastrous war -- now, as soon as possible.
http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20061127&s=editors
NOW THE DECIDER MUST LISTEN - EUGENE ROBINSON (WASHINGTON POST, NOVEMBER 10): "I haven't seen any indication that Bush is ready to ask himself the questions that millions of Americans posed on Tuesday: What are we accomplishing in Iraq?"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0901769_pf.html
THE DEFENSE SECRETARY WE HAD: TOUGH -- AND UNACCOUNTABLE - DAVID IGNATIUS (WASHINGTON POST, NOVEMBER 9): The Bush administration in recent weeks has -- very much in secret -- begun to ask itself the tough questions: Is the Iraq strategy working? Can we achieve our goals with the tools we have?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0802084_pf.html
UNDERSTANDING GATES: IT'S NOT AS SIMPLE AS FATHER'S TEAM VS. SON'S - JAMES MANN (WASHINGTON POST, NOVEMBER 10): Now, Bush has decided, without saying so, that his original judgment on Iraq was wrong.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...6110901774.html
A BUSH RETREAT? - REVIEW & OUTLOOK (WALL STREET JOURNAL, NOVEMBER 9): One reason the Iraqi government of Nouri al-Maliki has had such a hard time dismantling Shiite militias is because Shiites fear that it's only a matter of time before the U.S. abandons them again and they will have to confront the Sunni Baathist insurgency on their own. If President Bush wants to reassure Shiites on this score and about Mr. Gates, he should announce that the recent efforts to appease the Sunni terrorist political fronts in Iraq have failed.
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB1163...1728718013.html
PAID SUBSCRIPTION
SHIFT COMING IN US POLICY ON IRAQ: 'STAY THE COURSE' AND 'CUT AND RUN' AREN'T OPTIONS. SPEAKING TO 'AXIS OF EVIL' NEIGHBORS MAY BE - HOWARD LAFRANCHI (CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, NOVEMBER 8): The recommendations of what is simply being called the Baker commission are likely to have a greater impact on US policy than the election results.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1108/p01s01-uspo.html
STAGE SET FOR IRAQ POLICY SHIFT: BOTH PARTIES MAY SEEK COVER IN RECOMMENDATIONS OF STUDY GROUP - GLENN KESSLER AND THOMAS E. RICKS (WASHINGTON POST, NOVEMBER 9): The Baker-Hamilton study group's most likely recommendation will be to curtail the goal of democratizing Iraq and instead emphasize stability.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0802517_pf.html
GATES CRASHER - REUEL MARC GERECHT (WALL STREET JOURNAL, NOVEMBER 10): The Baker-Hamilton Iraq Survey Group has not discovered any way for the U.S. to exit Iraq -- except under catastrophic conditions.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1163125719...in_commentaries
PAID SUBSCRIPTION
'W.' MUST NOW STAND FOR 'WAR' - JOHN PODHORETZ (NEW YORK POST, NOVEMBER 9): Some early press leaks suggest the recommendations of the Baker Iraq Survey Group is to have a big international conference, make some deal with Iran and Syria, call it a landmark in world history and get out. Whatever that is, it wouldn't be victory but a face-saving exit.
http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print....n_podhoretz.htm
TIME TO TALK TO THE BAD GUYS - ANATOL LIEVEN (INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE, NOVEMBER 9): The only way in which America can now extricate itself from Iraq with some honor, while limiting the conflict there, is to appeal to Iraq's neighbors for help.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/09/opinion/edlieven.php
THE IRAQ MANDATE - ROBERT DREYFUSS (TOMPAINE.COM, NOVEMBER 8): Iraq's insurgency isn't going away until the last American soldier leaves Iraq.
http://www.tompaine.com/print/the_iraq_mandate.php
U.S. MUST GET OUT OF IRAQ -- NOW: IRAQ TAUGHT HIM THAT THE WEST HAS OVERESTIMATED THE INFLUENCE OF THE COALITION AND UNDERESTIMATED IRAQIS - RORY STEWART (TORONTO STAR, NOVEMBER 8): Withdrawal is coming. The sooner it happens, the better for Iraqis and for the United States.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1108-22.htm
RUMSFELD'S DEPARTURE - EDITORIAL (NEW YORK TIMES, NOVEMBER 9): Iraq must come first. Mr. Rumsfeld's departure has to be followed by a major change in policy if American troops can be brought home without leaving a disaster behind.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/09/opinion/...agewanted=print
DON'T BLAME RUMSFELD! - VICTOR DAVIS HANSON (NATIONAL REVIEW, NOVEMBER 9): For the future, neither precipitous withdrawal nor a big build-up are the right solutions, the former will leave chaos, the latter will only ensure perpetual Iraqi dependency.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=M...GY5YzBhYTBhMjU=
IMPERIAL HUBRIS: HAWKISH PROPONENTS OF "THE INCOMPETENCE DODGE" WON'T HAVE DONALD RUMSFELD TO KICK AROUND ANYMORE - SPENCER ACKERMAN (AMERICAN PROSPECT, NOVEMBER 8): There's an additional upside to the end of the Rumsfeld era: no more will Iraq hawks be able to wash away their sins in the blood of the defense secretary.
http://www.prospect.org/web/printfriendly-view.ww?id=12196














