You have the conservatives versus the liberals and you have the rich versus the poor. But it is not quite as simple as that. Some of us do not lack money (rich white western) but care about the poor. Some of us are against conservative right wingers but hold traditional values. In short, some of us are liberation theologists. Others of us are Libertarians. Some are both. We believe that our Christianity requires that we work on behalf of the poor. The liberals are not getting the overall picture, they are stuck in their own groove and cannot see anything on the horizon except their next pleasurable occupation....much like the conservatives.

The liberals will not win any elections because they are not intelligent enough to use the helping hand that the liberation theologists and libertarians give them time after time after time. The liberals are too hell bent on preserving their precious 'rights' and ignore the rights of those who are not as wealthy, healthy, or mature as them....think of the Muslim embryo or any embryo.

Liberals are for themselves, their freedome, their rights. Liberation theologists are for the rights of the poor and the oppressed. A liberal elite and a conservative can easily sit in a coffee room and get on with each other...but a liberation theologist will be disgusted with both of them and will not want to share any space with either.

The biggest issue to a liberal is 'myself'. The biggest issue to conservatives are 'us' as opposed to 'them.' Both are completely oblivious to their responsibilities towards society in general, their children in particular and of course their neighbours far and near.

Before the last election I was down and out...by drugs inflicted on me by my family. But before that I had been very active and as the election approached I had dropped many hints which my research and the research of many others like me would have helped liberals if only they had not been so selfish. My research showed that Bush was NOT a CONSERVATIVE and I gave sources etc....that others had given me....before we were all blocked off the internet. Not one of you seemed interested. Why not? In your lack of ability to see how the Conservatives were playing the DISINGENUOUS card, and in your general distaste of traditional values, you allowed Catholics to sway the election (seemingly at any rate - I still believe Gore won) for Bush. It did not MATTER which way Catholics ACTUALLY VOTED because the MEDIA had already made it clear in both 2000 and 2004 that the VATICAN desired for them to vote ANTI ABORTION. But the information that was going around was VERY DAMAGING TO BUSH'S ANTI-ABORTION CREDENTIALS...however as far as I know NOBODY TOOK THE SLIGHTEST BIT OF NOTICE. Y

You should have been outside Catholic churches canvassing people and putting handouts in their hands telling them Bush was PRO-Abortion. But because you also are PRO ABORTION, you did not want to even hold your nose and save the life of any unborn child and sacrifice your Holy Grail of FREEDOM TO KILL.

END OF RANT....(Please, I do not wish to offend. Some people are exactly in the same position as me and they have been supportive of my posts in the past. I address the liberals reading this.)

The fix is that they make a problem and then provide solutions which only add to the problem, though people have not yet figured it out.

Abortion is an example. Problem is a single mother cannot afford to look after her baby. Solution given by liberals is to take away the baby's life. Unforeseen result is that if you take someone else's rights away you are laying the foundation for having your own rights taken away. It might come via the same channels, or it might come by a revolt against the status quo (of liberal ideals). If it is based on faulty logic - ie. my rights are greater than your rights - then we are doomed together. We cannot safeguard for ourselves that which we deny to others.

Another example. Africa. The illuminati decided that it would be great if Africa which had not enough food to feed the people, was flooded with guns. The illuminati decided that it would be great if the various governments revolted against the people and committed genocide. Both these policies lead to what the illuminati want....for an unpopulated interior of the Continent of Africa. Why share the resources of Africa with indigenous people when you can simply depopulate with various plans including biological weapons like Aids.

The solution. Make sure that they ALL have guns. The small tribes who used to have their warfare with sticks now have youngsters who fire off guns for the simplest perceived offense and often at their OWN people. The problem was death by guns, and the solution leads to anarchy because the youngsters do not respect the old traditions.

The same happens all over the world just in different ways.

Communism in China was roundly condemned. Along came capitalism. Suddenly all the poor people in Shanghai and Beijing found themselves being routed out of their homes, the homes burnt to the ground and the government selling land to big business tycoons for office blocks. The problem was Communism, the solution was Capitalism which was equally bad for the poor, if not even worse for the POOR>

Now what we have is Capitalism being the Devil. What is the solution. How about COMMUNISM? That is what they are going to say. It does not matter that Communism failed. It does not matter that it was apparently routed out by Reagan and John Paul 11. We are getting COMMUNISM whether we like it or not and basically because we do not DESERVE any better.

I would like to point to a few patterns. The illuminati love patterns with words and with numbers, and symbols.

Look at all these significant places which happen to fall on or around 33 degrees latitude.
Hiroshima
Nagasaki
Baghdad
Dallas.
They were all the scenes of great historically infamous acts. Three of the four have two 'A's in them. Now look at this:

Saddam Hussein
Osama Bin Ladin
Barack O Bama
They all have a lot of 'A's in them. Particularly the last one. I am certain this is just a happy coincidence. It also applies to Nelson Mandella. Maybe the As saved his life. He later did a Rhodes Scholarship and was brought on board the British Imperialism and New World Order bandwagon. Clinton (Bill) was also a Rhodes Scholar. Who was Clinton's dad? That is a secret it seems.

A is a favourite of the freemasons. It has a pyramid shape. Take off the cross bar and it is more obvious and they do it all the time in company logos. M is also used by some companies to show their Freemason origins.

In the advertising of the Da Vinci Code (I notice that already it is available in the convenience shops of Tokyo alongside other films that are ancient) you would have seen that the A and V were in red. The A did not have a cross bar. The other letters were in black. Maybe you did not get this in America. I noticed it in Tokyo.

See the pattern repeating itself. The problem is Terrorism (well, terrorism was the excuse for Militaristic Fascism, and the solution is Communism.) Barack Obama has many policies that fit in with communism and so does his friend and mentor Mrs Clinton. He is against private OWNERSHIP. Friends, you may not care about your child in the womb, but you are going to care when they come for your pornographic DVDs. He is against guns. He is for big government.

I just realized that apart from Europe all the continents have two As in them.

America
Asia
Africa
Antartic
Arctic (woops! just one)
Australia (wow! three)

Japan also has two As. This was captured after the second world war.

Then there is the dubious honour of three As in Canada.

What can be the meaning of this?????

Diana who died on st Aidan's feast day (anagram) And to make this happen they had to tow her around for four hours either dead or still alive, so that it would end up on the right day that they announced her death. (Local time.)
Madonna who is still very much alive....and belongs to a CABALIST Sect...who she supports financially in return for ???. (Note the As)

I think you might find my post on Barack Obama interesting. I read quite a bit of your posts which included comments about Obama, and I think you would be in the majority of whom I speak in the post. It's called "Obama Dreams."

Tamaj13