Full Version: Circuit Court Rules DeLay Must Stay On Ballot
I'm not sure where this stands now. The lawyer says he will appeal to the Supreme Court. (If it goes to the SC, considering that it almost always rules in favor of the GOP on political issues, I think we know the probable outcome.) However, time is running short, and it would require extraordinarily quick action by the Supremes. Another possibility would be to appeal to the entire 5th Circuit, which seems more likely.
By KELLEY SHANNON
Associated Press Writer
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A federal appeals court panel on Thursday refused to let Texas Republicans replace Tom DeLay’s name on the November congressional ballot.
The finding upheld a July ruling by a federal judge that the ballot must list DeLay, who won a March primary before resigning from Congress on June 9. He now lives in Virginia but is awaiting trial in Texas state court on money laundering and conspiracy charges alleging that illegal corporate cash helped pay for legislative campaigns in 2002.
“This was a victory for fair and ethical elections protecting the integrity of the democratic process. Both parties have nominees for the general election and it’s time to move forward,” said Cris Feldman, a lawyer for the Texas Democratic Party.
The Republicans’ lawyer said he would appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“What’s happening here is the Democrat Party is trying to control the Republican nominee,” said GOP attorney Jim Bopp. “I think that’s fundamentally incompatible with a viable two-party system and a democratic process.”
Republicans want to pick another nominee to face Democrat Nick Lampson in November. Democrats sued to keep DeLay on the ballot. Keeping him on the ballot presumably gives them an easier race and bolsters their attempts to make the indicted former House majority leader their symbol for claims of Republican corruption.
Thursday’s ruling said that GOP state chairwoman Tina Benkiser acted unconstitutionally when she tried to remove DeLay as the party nominee because he had moved.
Democrats had noted that DeLay’s wife, Christine, still lives in the DeLays’ house in Sugar Land, just outside Houston.
While the U.S. Constitution requires a candidate to live in-state, the question is where he is residing on Election Day, not now, said the three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
“DeLay could be a current resident of Virginia ... and nonetheless move back to Texas before November,” the opinion said.
DeLay has suggested he might actively campaign if he is left on the ballot. His spokeswoman, Dani DeLay Ferro, did not respond to a request for comment.
If DeLay withdraws from the race — rather than being declared ineligible — by law Republicans could not replace him with another candidate.
By KELLEY SHANNON
Associated Press Writer
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A federal appeals court panel on Thursday refused to let Texas Republicans replace Tom DeLay’s name on the November congressional ballot.
The finding upheld a July ruling by a federal judge that the ballot must list DeLay, who won a March primary before resigning from Congress on June 9. He now lives in Virginia but is awaiting trial in Texas state court on money laundering and conspiracy charges alleging that illegal corporate cash helped pay for legislative campaigns in 2002.
“This was a victory for fair and ethical elections protecting the integrity of the democratic process. Both parties have nominees for the general election and it’s time to move forward,” said Cris Feldman, a lawyer for the Texas Democratic Party.
The Republicans’ lawyer said he would appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“What’s happening here is the Democrat Party is trying to control the Republican nominee,” said GOP attorney Jim Bopp. “I think that’s fundamentally incompatible with a viable two-party system and a democratic process.”
Republicans want to pick another nominee to face Democrat Nick Lampson in November. Democrats sued to keep DeLay on the ballot. Keeping him on the ballot presumably gives them an easier race and bolsters their attempts to make the indicted former House majority leader their symbol for claims of Republican corruption.
Thursday’s ruling said that GOP state chairwoman Tina Benkiser acted unconstitutionally when she tried to remove DeLay as the party nominee because he had moved.
Democrats had noted that DeLay’s wife, Christine, still lives in the DeLays’ house in Sugar Land, just outside Houston.
While the U.S. Constitution requires a candidate to live in-state, the question is where he is residing on Election Day, not now, said the three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
“DeLay could be a current resident of Virginia ... and nonetheless move back to Texas before November,” the opinion said.
DeLay has suggested he might actively campaign if he is left on the ballot. His spokeswoman, Dani DeLay Ferro, did not respond to a request for comment.
If DeLay withdraws from the race — rather than being declared ineligible — by law Republicans could not replace him with another candidate.
Watch the piece of sh*t win. 
QUOTE(D103486 @ Aug 3 2006, 05:09 PM)
Watch the piece of sh*t win.
If he stays on the ballot, I wouldn't rule out that possibility. However, his negatives are so high that Lampson would certainly have a good shot.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.