http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/for...topic=53443&hl=

has the last 1500 posts, and due to length has been closed.

This would be the start of Volume 3

Hope I did not make a mistake here...I was trying to post the last answer on the Vol.2 but it did not take...

Yahoo!!! First to post, outside orignal poster.

Nyuk nyuk nyuk nyuk

Now, down to business.

I can say absolutely 100% for sure that I'm not sure what the hell happened.

But I shore do smells a rat.


Edit: damn -- G4A beat me to the 2nd post.

As this is a new thread, let me be the first to reitterate-

19 bumbling people could not do a millitary style precision hit on the 2 WTC buildings, and have 4 WTC buildings fall down.

Let alone have a mysterious passport float down to earth and not be used by a low NYC Criminal to steal electronics, but to come to the attention of the actual agent of the US Government who could then i.d. the 19 bumblers.

Yeah, sounds like the nose knows it smells like crap.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/2242594.stm

Saturday, 7 September, 2002, 09:48 GMT 10:48 UK
Taleban 'warned US of huge attack'
Taleban news conference in September 2001


By Kate Clark
Former BBC correspondent in Kabul
An aide to the former Taleban foreign minister, Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil, has revealed that he was sent to warn American diplomats and the United Nations that Osama bin Laden was due to launch a huge attack on American soil.

Neither organisation heeded the warning, which was given just weeks before the 11 September attacks.

The aide said he had urged the Americans to launch a military campaign against al-Qaeda but was told that this was politically impossible.

Osama Bin Laden
Bin Laden: The Taleban's chief "guest"
Mr Muttawakil, who was known to be deeply unhappy with the Arab and other foreign militants in Afghanistan, learned of Osama bin Laden's plan in July.

The attack was imminent, he discovered, and it would be huge. Bin Laden hoped to kill thousands of US citizens.

Destructive guests

The information had come not from other members of the Taleban but from the leader of the Islamic movement of Uzbekistan, Tohir Yuldash, who had found refuge in Afghanistan and had good links with al-Qaeda.

The minister was deeply worried that the US military would react with deadly vengeance against Afghanistan.

The guests [al-Qaeda] were going to destroy the guesthouse [Afghanistan]

Taleban official
As he put it, al-Qaeda, the Taleban's guests, were going to destroy the guest house.

One of his former aides told me how he had been sent to issue warnings.

He went first to the American consulate in Peshawar in Pakistan, then to the United Nations. But neither warning was heeded.

One US official explained why:

"We were hearing a lot of that kind of stuff," he said.

"When people keep saying the sky's going to fall in, and it doesn't, a kind of 'warning fatigue' sets in."

Another diplomatic source said he had thought the meeting was an attempt to rattle the US to please funders in the Gulf, a bid to raise money from al-Qaeda's donors.

Only Taleban alert

And the fact that the aide had been told not to mention Mr Muttawakil's name also led to a downgrading of the information.

At the time, late July last year, 19 members of al-Qaeda were already in place in America, waiting to launch their deadly attacks.

It is already known that American domestic intelligence failed to heed information, but this is the only known alert that came from inside the Taleban movement.

The former foreign minister himself is now unavailable for comment - he handed himself in to the Afghan authorities in February.

He remains in US custody in Kandahar, one of the few senior Taleban whom America has managed to arrest.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/01/abc-blame-clinton/

New ABC Docudrama Blames Clinton For 9/11, Praises Bush
On September 10 and 11, ABC will air a “docudrama” called “The Path to 9/11.” It was written by Cyrus Nowrasteh, who describes himself as “more of a libertarian than a strict conservative,” and is giving interviews to hard-right sites like FrontPageMag to promote the film.

What will it say about President Clinton? Here’s Rush Limbaugh with a preview:

A friend of mine [Cyrus Nowrasteh] out in California has produced and filmed — I think it’s a two-part mini-series on 9/11 that ABC is going to run in prime-time over two nights, close to or on 9/11. It’s sort of surprising that ABC’s picked it up, to me. I’ve had a lot of people tell me about it, my friends told me about it…And from what I have been told, the film really zeros in on the shortcomings of the Clinton administration in doing anything about militant Islamofascism or terrorism during its administration. It cites failures of Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright and Sandy Burglar.

How does it deal with President Bush? Salon has a review:

Condoleezza Rice gets that fated memo about planes flying into buildings, and makes it very clear to anyone who’ll listen just how concerned President Bush is about these terrorist threats — despite the fact that we’re given little concrete evidence of the president’s concern or interest in taking action. Maybe my memory fails me, but the only person I remember talking about Osama bin Laden back in 1998 was President Clinton, while the current anti-terrorist stalwarts worked the country into a frenzy over what? Blow jobs. In the end, “The Path to 9/11″ feels like an excruciatingly long, winding and deceptive path, indeed.

The director of the film, David Cunningham, is already backtracking about its accuracy, saying “this is not a documentary.” OK, fair enough. But the movie is being billed as “based on The 9/11 Commission Report.”

for everyone's convenience, let me review the previous thread,

Did so! Did not! You're blind, did so! You're crazy, did not! yada yada yada...

Ok, lets resume.

actually, the #2 thread is still open.

They must have done some editing, so someone should just put this on the other one again.

Could have sworn someone said when it hits around 1500 answers, and 30 pages, it is archieved and another begins...

Maybe they are trying to divide us?

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/September..._b_Activist.htm

Writer of ABC’s 9/11 ‘Docudrama’ Is Avowed Conservative Activist

Think Progress | September 1 2006

Comment: Clinton did pass up the opportunity to grab bin Laden on several occasions - both administrations were responsible for protecting the terrorists. flashback: Clinton administration protection of terrorists

ABC will air a “docudrama” next weekend called “The Path to 9/11? which blames President Clinton for the 9/11 attacks while praising President Bush.

The writer of the movie is an unabashed conservative named Cyrus Nowrasteh. Last year, Nowrasteh spoke on a panel titled, “Rebels With a Cause: How Conservatives Can Lead Hollywood’s Next Paradigm Shift.” He has described Michael Moore as “an out of control socialist weasel,” and conducted interviews with right-wing websites like FrontPageMag.

The problem isn’t that Nowrasteh is conservative. The problem is that Nowrasteh and ABC are representing “The Path to 9/11? as an unbiased historical drama. Promos for the movie say it is “based on the 9/11 Commission Report.” Nowrasteh claims he “wanted to match the just-the-facts tone of the report,” and describes the project as “an objective telling of the events of 9/11.”

Here’s some of the objectivity you can expect: Nowrasteh says the film shows how Clinton had “frequent opportunities…in the 90s to stop Bin Laden in his tracks — but lacked the will to do so.” He has referenced Clinton’s “lack of response” to Al Qaeda “and how this emboldened Bin Laden to keep attacking American interests.” A review today in Salon.com says the film paints Clinton “as a buffoon more interested in blow jobs than terrorists.”

The funny thing about blaming Bill that is interesting...

If you use the logic that Bush was only 9 months in office when 9-11 happened, then

Bush's Poppy #41 was to blame for the first WTC blast, which happened only a few months into clinton's term

Bill Clinton was nurtured and shaped to fulfil his role for the New World Order. He was influenced by a cleric who was a freemason, he was working and living in the same place as Albert Pike had done, and doing the same job (a lawyer). He was educted by Jesuits at Georgetown University I believe. He was then given a Rhodes Scholarship to Oxford University in England where he would be introduced to the Plot and indoctrinated on the need for a NWO. Cecil Rhodes of Rhodesia fame, (Rhodesia later became Zimbabwe and Zambia or something like that) believed in British Imperialism and was dedicated to getting the USA back under British rule. He had been a freemason but was disallusioned, thinking that freemasons were not political enough. He had set up a secret society. He then had the Rhodes Scholarship which was another tool of the illuminati.

The Bush's have for generations belonged to Skull and Bones, which is Yale's way of chosing the illuminatis' people for leadership roles. It does not matter how stupid those people are, in fact the stupider the better. To match the followers. Dumb down the leaders first.