HUGHES: FIXING U.S. IMAGE MAY TAKE YEARS - ANNE GEARAN, AP (SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, SEPTEMBER 28): It may take decades to change anti-American feelings around the world that have been aggravated by war in Iraq, U.S. policy toward Israel and America's "sex and violence" culture, said the State Department official in charge of dealing with the U.S. image abroad, Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Karen Hughes.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...&type=printableRICE, THE RETURN OF THE BAD COP? - SHMUEL ROSNER (HAARETZ, SEPTEMBER 26): A few weeks ago, a pro-Israel activist complained bitterly about the damaging influence of Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy Karen Hughes on U.S. policy. On the whole, this is a complaint that should not come as a surprise. Hughes is in charge of improving the American image around the world, including the Arab world; and during her visits to Arab capitals, she hears, and then reports at home, that the U.S. has no chance of improving its position as long as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains unresolved.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/rosnerB...listSrc=Y&art=1RECONSIDER FUNDING FOR UNITED NATIONS - EDITORIAL (WHEELING NEWS REGISTER, WV, SEPTEMBER 28): Congress might better divert some of the billions that now go down the U.N. rat hole instead to defense and U.S. public diplomacy efforts abroad.
http://www.news-register.net/editorials/ar...articleID=11012KEITH OLBERMANN TAKES A LOOK BACK AT BUSH'S FIRST MONTHS IN OFFICE LEADING UP TO 9/11 - (CROOKS AND LIARS, SEPTEMBER 27): Commentator Olbermann: "On January 25th, five days after Mr. Bush took office, counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke sent Rice a memo, attaching to it a document entitled 'Strategy for Eliminating the Threat... of al Qaeda. It was, Clarke wrote, 'developed by the last Administration to give to you...[incorporating] diplomatic, economic, military, public diplomacy and intelligence tools.'"
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/09/27/k...ding-up-to-911/BLUEPRINT FOR AN AMERICAN EMPIRE - GREG GRANDIN (ALTERNET, SEPTEMBER 27): To confront an adversarial press, tame a presumptuous Congress, and make inroads on college campuses, the Reagan administration orchestrated a sophisticated and centralized "public diplomacy" campaign that deployed techniques drawn from both the PR world and the intelligence community.
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/41972/U.S. SENATE PASSES NEW DETAINEE RULES - KATE ZERNIKE (INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE, SEPTEMBER 28): The U.S. Senate approved a measure on Thursday on the interrogations and trials of terrorism suspects, establishing far-reaching rules to deal with what President George W. Bush has called the most dangerous combatants in a different type of war.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/29/ame....0929detain.phpRUSHING OFF A CLIFF EDITORIAL (NEW YORK TIMES, SEPTEMBER 28): Last week, the White House and three Republican senators announced a terrible deal on this legislation that gave Mr. Bush most of what he wanted, including a blanket waiver for crimes Americans may have committed in the service of his antiterrorism policies. Americans of the future will know that in 2006, Congress passed a tyrannical law that will be ranked with the low points in American democracy, our generations version of the Alien and Sedition Acts.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/opinion/...agewanted=printDON'T SUSPEND HABEAS CORPUS: ANY BILL THAT DENIES THAT BASIC RIGHT TO DETAINEES SHOULD BE REJECTED - EDITORIAL (LOS ANGELES TIMES, SEPTEMBER 28)
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-...-opinion-centerHABEAS CORPUS, R.I.P. (1215 - 2006) - MOLLY IVINS (TRUTHDIG, SEPTEMBER 28/COMMON DREAMS): With a smug stroke of his pen, President Bush is set to wipe out a safeguard against illegal imprisonment that has endured as a cornerstone of legal justice since the Magna Carta.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0928-20.htmOUTSOURCING TORTURE EDITORIAL (BOSTON GLOBE, SEPTEMBER 28): If the United States would adhere to its "high standards" in dealing with Muslims, it might look to them for assistance against Islamic extremists. Instead, Congress and President Bush risk torturing detainees and embittering their communities.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial...torture?mode=PFACCOUNTING FOR THE DETAINEES - WILLIAM H. TAFT IV (WASHINGTON POST, SEPTEMBER 27): Some years ago the United States was a leading voice in deploring regimes that "disappeared" their opponents. It's time to reestablish our credentials as a critic of this practice.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2601143_pf.htmlA FAIR, SAFE WAY TO CLOSE GUANTANANAMO - MAX PAUL FRIEDMAN (CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, SEPTEMBER 27): Conditional release for those who do not appear dangerous, trials for those who do: This approach worked during WWII and can be refined now.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0927/p09s01-coop.htmlWHAT IRAQIS WANT: ONCE MORE WITH FEELING MARC LYNCH (ABU AARDVARK, SEPTEMBER 27): A large majority of Iraqis do, in fact, want American troops out as soon as possible.
http://abuaardvark.typepad.com/abuaardvark...iraqis_wan.htmlSEE ALSO
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/28/poll.iraq/http://www.antiwar.com/lobe/?articleid=9762IRAQI JOURNALISTS ADD LAWS TO LIST OF DANGERS - PAUL VON ZIELBAUER (NEW YORK TIMES, SEPTEMBER 29): Under a broad new set of laws criminalizing speech that ridicules the government or its officials, some resurrected verbatim from Saddam HusseinVs penal code, roughly a dozen Iraqi journalists have been charged with offending public officials in the past year.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/29/world/mi...agewanted=printIRAQ CONTRACTOR'S WORK IS FURTHER CRITICIZED - 13 OF 14 PROJECTS FOUND WANTING BY AUDIT - GRIFF WITTE (WASHINGTON, SEPTEMBER 29): The contractor that botched construction of a $75 million police academy in Baghdad so badly that human waste dripped from the ceilings has produced shoddy work on 13 out of 14 projects reviewed by federal auditors, the top official monitoring Iraq's reconstruction told Congress yesterday.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2801048_pf.htmlIRAQ AT THE GATES OF HELL: GEORGE BUSH'S IRAQ IN 21 QUESTIONS - TOM ENGELHARDT (TOMDISPATCH, SEPTEMBER 28): Iraq is the tragedy of our times, an event that has brought out, and will continue to bring out, the worst in us all. It is carnage incarnate.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=125142THE MYTHS AND REALITIES OF IRAQ - NIKOLAS GVOSDEV AND RAY TAKEYH (BOSTON GLOBE, SEPTEMBER 29): The problems that the American invasion was to avert have only grown worse.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial...of_iraq?mode=PFSTAY THE COURSE IN IRAQ? WHAT COURSE?: IF IRAQ IS THE CENTRAL FRONT FOR THE WAR ON TERROR, IT'S ONLY BECAUSE THE WAR THERE HAS MADE IT SO - DANIEL SCHORR (CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, SEPTEMBER 29)
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0929/p09s02-cods.htmlINFIDEL DOCUMENTS - FOUAD AJAMI (WALL STREET JOURNAL, SEPTEMBER 28): We needn't give credence to the assertion of President Bush -- that the jihadists would turn up in our cities if we pulled up stakes from Baghdad -- to recognize that a terrible price would be paid were we to opt for a hasty and unseemly withdrawal from Iraq.
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB1159...6922176290.htmlPAID SUBSCRIPTION
100 DEAD IN IRAQ ON THURSDAY; INCLUDING 60 BODIES FOUND IN BAGHDAD (INFORMED COMMENT: THOUGHTS ON THE MIDDLE EAST, HISTORY, AND RELIGION, SEPTEMBER 29): Bush accused the Democrats of being the party of "cut and run," on Thursday. But when you are losing a guerrilla war, you should begin considering an orderly retreat. Otherwise you will be stuck in an ever worsening quagmire.
http://www.juancole.com/ (scroll down link for item)
A WAR WE HAVE TO WIN - JEFF JACOBY (BOSTON GLOBE, SEPTEMBER 27): Has US military action in Iraq inflamed the global jihad? Undoubtedly. But just imagine how galvanized it would be by a US retreat.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial..._to_win?mode=PFFIGHTING THEM OVER THERE: IRAQ IS NOT A BREEDING GROUND FOR TERRORISTS, IT'S A DUMPING GROUND - LEE SMITH (WEEKLY STANDARD, SEPTEMBER 28): We should start to see Iraq the way Arab regimes see such jihad-zones, as a far away place for Muslim fanatics to go and die.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Publ...12/745vhonu.aspIRAQ AND JIHAD -- A CONSENSUS SURFACES: THE CONTINUING SPREAD OF ISLAMIST TERRORISM AROUND THE WORLD -- CITED IN AN INTELLIGENCE REPORT -- IS UNLIKELY TO ALTER BUSH'S COURSE - PETER GRIER (CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, SEPTEMBER 28)
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0928/p01s02-usfp.htmOF COURSE IRAQ MADE IT WORSE - DANIEL BENJAMIN AND STEVEN SIMON (WASHINGTON POST, SEPTEMBER 29): The invasion of Iraq was the wrong answer to the terrorist challenge, for which we will pay a high price for years to come.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...6092801455.htmlTERRORISTS' 'EXCUSE DU JOUR': IF THERE WERE NO IRAQ WAR, EXTREMISTS WOULD JUST FIND ANOTHER RALLYING CRY - JONAH GOLDBERG (LOS ANGELES TIMES, SEPTEMBER 28)
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-...inion-rightrailNEW WOODWARD BOOK SAYS BUSH IGNORED URGENT WARNING ON IRAQ - DAVID E. SANGER (NEW YORK TIMES, SEPTEMBER 29): As its title indicates, "State of Denial" by Bob Woodward follows the storyline of an administration that seemed to have only a foggy notion that early military success in Iraq had given way to resentment of the occupiers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/29/washingt...agewanted=printTWO WARS, ONE MISSION: FAVORING THE 'GOOD WAR' IN AFGHANISTAN OVER IRAQ IGNORES THAT THE TWO COUNTRIES' FATES ARE INTERTWINED - RICH LOWRY AND DAVID B. RIVKIN JR. (LOS ANGELES TIMES, SEPTEMBER 28)
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commen...omment-opinionsMISSING FROM THE NIE: AFGHANISTAN - PAUL SPERRY (ANTIWAR.COM, SEPTEMBER 29): The media missed the real story regarding the National Intelligence Estimate of the global terror threat. It's not what's in the declassified executive summary of the report -- Iraq, which was unavoidable -- it's what's absent from it -- Afghanistan, where the Taliban are making a frightening and bloody comeback.
http://www.antiwar.com/sperry/?articleid=9766WHEN HAMID MET PERVEZ - EDITORIAL (NEW YORK TIMES, SEPTEMBER 29): Mr. Bush needs to focus on the real problems of Afghan security and reconstruction.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/29/opinion/...agewanted=printAFGHANISTAN'S GOOD NEWS: SEEDS OF ECONOMIC PROGRESS - BY KARL F. INDERFURTH (CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, SEPTEMBER 29)
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0929/p09s01-coop.htmlUSE BRINKMANSHIP ON IRAN: ANY DIPLOMATIC EFFORT BY THE U.S. WON'T WORK UNLESS BACKED UP BY A CREDIBLE THREAT OF FORCE - ROBERT D. KAPLAN (LOS ANGELES TIMES, SEPTEMBER 29)
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-...inion-rightrailIRAN'S URANIUM GLITCH: TECHNICAL TROUBLES OFFER TIME FOR DIPLOMACY - DAVID IGNATIUS (WASHINGTON POST, SEPTEMBER 29): Intelligence analysts believe that Iran is encountering technical difficulties in mastering the complex process of uranium enrichment. That means the West may have a bit more time than previously expected to pursue a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear standoff.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2801453_pf.htmlUNEASY PARTNERS: PAKISTAN AND THE UNITED STATES - EHSAN AHRARI (ANTIWAR.COM, SEPTEMBER 29)
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/ahrari.php?articleid=9764THE MUSHARRAF EXCEPTION - ROBERT L. POLLOCK (WALL STREET JOURNAL, SEPTEMBER 29): Over the longer term, the credibility of our efforts to address the root causes of terror will require nudging Pakistan, too, back toward the democratic path.
http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB1159...8500677436.htmlPAID SUBSCRIPTION
EMBRACE FOR A STRONGMAN: LUCKILY FOR KAZAKHSTAN'S RULER, PRESIDENT BUSH DOESN'T HEED HIS OWN SPEECHES - EDITORIAL (WASHINGTON POST, SEPTEMBER 29): The history of U.S. relations with Muslim states during the Cold War -- such as Iran and Iraq -- vividly demonstrates the shortsightedness of befriending rulers such as Nursultan Nazarbayev, Kazhazstan's president.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2801673_pf.htmlDON'T PLAY POLITICS WITH KAZAKHSTAN - S. FREDERICK STARR (WASHINGTON POST, SEPTEMBER 28): U.S. critics of Kazakhstan have every right to remind us that the country still falls short in many respects. But in the eyes of some Kazakhs, the United States may be a less than perfect partner as well. If either of these groups succeeds in damaging the basis of our partnership, further progress in Kazakh social policy and legal and electoral reform will be the first to suffer. And Kazakh oil will then flow mainly to China and other countries that pay their bills and ask no questions.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2601141_pf.htmlKAZAKHSTAN'S NO JOKE: THOUGH LAMPOONED BY A BRITISH COMEDIAN, THE HUGE CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRY IS AN IMPORTANT IF TROUBLED ALLY EDITORIAL (LOS ANGELES TIMES, SEPTEMBER 29): The president can have more influence over Nazarbayev by keeping him close -- and offering incentives to open his society -- than by shunning him.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-...pinion-leftrailTHE ISLAMIZATION OF MOROCCO: EXTREMISM IS DISPLACING MODERATION IN THE NORTH AFRICAN KINGDOM - OLIVIER GUITTA (WEEKLY STANDARD, OCTOBER 2)
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Publ...12/740boykt.aspMUSLIMS' COMPLICITY WITH VIOLENCE: UNLESS IT CLAMPS DOWN VIGOROUSLY ON FANATICISM, THE ISLAMIC WORLD RISKS VALIDATING ITS WORST CARICATURES - MAX BOOT (LOS ANGELES TIMES, SEPTEMBER 27)
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commen...omment-opinionsISLAM AND THE POPE - THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN (NEW YORK TIMES, SEPTEMBER 29): "I'm all for a respectful dialogue between Islam and the West, but first there needs to be a respectful, free dialogue between Muslims and Muslims."
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/29/opini...agewanted=printPAID SUBSCRIPTION
THE GRAND DELUSION - DAVID BROOKS (NEW YORK TIMES, SEPTEMBER 28): More and more people are falling for the Grand Delusion -- the notion that if we just leave the extremists alone, they will leave us alone. The blunt fact is that groups of Islamic extremists will continue to compete and grow until mainstream Islamic moderates can establish a more civilized set of criteria for prestige and greatness.
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/opini...agewanted=printPAID SUBSCRIPTION
I'M NO BUSH HATER: THERE'S A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DISLIKING THE PRESIDENT AND DISLIKING HIS POLICIES - ROSA BROOKS (LOS ANGELES TIMES, SEPTEMBER 29): The United States is in trouble. The spread of militant Islamic extremism and WMD will pose dangers for decades to come, and global warming, disease and poverty are all serious threats.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-...inion-rightrail WORDS VS. DEEDS: BUSH AND ISLAM - NICOLA NASSER (COUNTERPUNCH, SEPTEMBER 28): Bush accuses Islamists of forcing their version of things on others while he unsheathes his sword out and high to dictate a 21st century white man mission to convert Muslims to a version of Islam that serves U.S. interests.
http://www.counterpunch.org/nasser09282006.htmlKEEPING TERRORISM AWAY - EDWARD ROYCE (WASHINGTON TIMES, SEPTEMBER 29): Five years after September 11, 2001, the view from the cave of an aging and possibly dying bin Laden is not one of victory, but of disintegrating plans for a caliphate stretching across the Islamic world. (Edward Royce, California Republican, is chairman of the House International Relations Terrorism Subcommittee).
http://www.washtimes.com/functions/print.p...28-101420-8000rPOW! (NOT.) - BAGNEWSNOTES (SEPTEMBER 24): While American men and women are spilling real blood in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Global War on Terror has devolved into a clown show.
http://bagnewsnotes.typepad.com/bagnews/2006/09/pow_not.htmlFINAL REPORT: FORGING A WORLD OF LIBERTY UNDER LAW, U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY, G. JOHN IKENBERRY AND ANNE-MARIE SLAUGHTER PRINCETON PROJECT ON NATIONAL SECURITY (SEPTEMBER 27): The basic objective of U.S. strategy must be to protect the American people and the American way of life. To achieve this goal in the 21st century, American strategy must, inter alia, be: a) integrated, fusing hard power -- the power to coerce -- and soft power -- the power to attract;

adapted to the information age, enabling us to be fast and flexible in a world where information moves instantly, actors respond to it instantly, and specialized small units come together for only a limited time for a defined purpose -- whether to make a deal, restructure a company, or plan and execute a terrorist attack.
http://www.wws.princeton.edu/ppns/report/FinalReport.pdf