QUOTE(noonanda @ Dec 20 2004, 03:40 PM)
I guess if we disagree on a subject that we are just trolls or freepers.
Originally a slang term for a member of Free Republic; but also refers to anyone (or one, in general) of right-wing or Republican political stance.
So the facts that some people believe that hunting helps control overpopulation means we are just wrong?
Have you ever seen a deer starve to death due to overpopulation?
Actually, out here in West Texas, I have seen years with quite a lot of starving deer. Average rainfall is about 17" annual, but follow a good green pasture year with a dry one, and the wet year's bumper crop starves in droves. Then, just to add some excitement, the deer come out of the browned out pastures and graze along the highway right of way they usually avoid, making for a huge increase of night time collisions with passing cars. A good friend of mine damn near died and will limp for the rest of his life after one such accident coming home from Austin.
The top of the food chain predators that once ate the surplus are long gone. Hunting is replacement function. We just had the a record rain year, the season has already been extended with emphasis on taking breeding does rather than trophy bucks, and that may not reduce population by enough if we go back to another dry year.
I see nothing wrong, philosophically or ecologically, with controlled hunting. In case nobody noticed, WE are now the top of the food chain predator. Before the days of Wildlife Commissions or deer rifles, the first humans to cross from Siberia hunted several species of large animal prey to extinction with nothing more than wooden spears, pit traps, and hunger. Seen a Wooly Mammoth lately? Number of legally hunted species in danger of extinction in North Amerca now: ZERO.
I personally have no use for the "canned" hunt, but since the prey however helpless is non-native to begin with such hunts are an ecological cipher whatever one's personal opinion of the alleged "sport" may be.