Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Why the Iraq Surge Already Is a Failure
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Foreign Policy and National Defense > Afghanistan and Iraq
Noonan
Why the Iraq Surge Already Is a Failure

By Shaun Mullen



Divers search for victims after explosion on key Baghdad bridge

It has been a hugely embarrassing month for President Bush’s last-gasp “surge” strategy.

It is not surprising that casualties are way up and that 13 days into April some 55 U.S. troops have been killed, a rate of death higher than any month since Baghdad fell four years ago this week.

A spike in deaths was to be expected because of increased action in the capital and elsewhere, so we can put that unpleasant reality aside and move on to two hugely symbolic events on Thursday that should not have happened if the surge was working:

* The deaths of eight people from a suicide bomb attack just a few feet from the main chamber of the Iraqi Parliament. Two Sunni legislators died and 20 people were wounded, including 11 members of Parliament.

Parliament reconvened today to condemn the attack, but few members attended.

* The destruction by truck bomb of the heavily traveled Sarafiya Bridge across the Tigris, an oft photographed symbol of a Baghdad that no longer exists except in the delusion minds of John McCain and his ilk. Six people died.

The grim reality is that despite the best efforts of U.S. commanders and their troops, Iraq continues to become less safe and the war has now reached into the heart of what was supposed to be the most secure place in the entire country – the hermetically sealed Green Zone.

No Americans were wounded in the attacks. Both appeared to have been indiscriminate, targeting Iraqis in general as a civil war unleashed by the botched U.S. occupation rages on.

In a sense, the occupiers have become a sideshow and the spike in American deaths is merely collateral damage in a larger drama that will continue despite the surge – and to an extent because of it.

There is collateral damage in Washington, as well.

An isolated President Bush is yet again looking for a way to rescue failed military, political and reconstruction strategies that never have been in sync over the last four years because of his manifold leadership failures.

The latest solution is to find a high-level coordinator – in effect a war czar — to see the surge through, but everyone approached to date has turned down the White House.

Pathetic.

Grimmer still is the news that nearly half of the West Point class of 2001, the first class affected by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, are opting out of continuing to serve in the Army at the end of their required 5 years. The reason most often given is repeated tours in the war zones, a phenomenon similar to that seen at the end of the Vietnam War.

Bush has stretched the Army to the breaking point and now it is losing its best and brightest because of a failed presidency and a failed war.

Photograph by Wathiq Khuzaie/Getty Images
rla
In my opinion it is not a failure because it is buying time to complete the Iraqi Legislative oil deal,
which was its purpose.
cutecat
QUOTE(rla @ Apr 13 2007, 07:36 AM) *
In my opinion it is not a failure because it is buying time to complete the Iraqi Legislative oil deal,
which was its purpose.



Your giving administration credit for compasionate thinking. This was not the purpose. The purpose was to reverse American opionion and carry over to next administration.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.