Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: We all eat, drink and breath DU everyday!
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Energy Independence, Environment, Science and Technology > Environment
theroyprocess
We all eat, drink and breath DU everyday!.

Depleted Uranium - The Ultimate Dirty Bomb -10 min.
Youtube Video - Dr. Rokke, Leuren Moret

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg2NHfoC2pc&mode=related
----------------------------------------
Trap Rock URL

http://traprockpeace.org/
http://www.traprockpeace.org/depleted_uranium.html
http://traprockpeace.org/WBAIDepletedUranium.mp3
----------------------------------------
(Posted for educational and research purposes only,
in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107).

_________________
"Nuclear power is one hell of a way to boil water," Albert Einstein once said.
theroyprocess
FYI
Dr. Bertell - Free Video - DU
and the human body

Abrams tank fires Depleted Uranium

Dr. Rosalie Bertell's short new film describes what Depleted Uranium in combat does to the human body.

Here is Sister Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., Epidemiologist, in a short film, "Depleted Uranium Inside the Human Body". In this brief video, Dr. Bertell explains, using simple terms anyone can understand, how "Depleted" Uranium (Uranium-238) when used in combat, impacts and damages the human body.

This brief ten minute film should be required viewing for anyone contemplating enlisting for military service or for anyone who does not yet know what "Depleted" Uranium is doing to people all over the planet.

View the short video here:

http://tinyurl.com/3yumuw or

http://akamat.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/dep...ie-bertell-phd/

To read Dr. Bertell's articles:
http://www.iicph.org/

To watch more of Dr. Bertell's videos:
http://www.snowshoefilms.com/rbertell.html

After becoming familiar with the devastating effects of weaponized "Depleted" Uranium, a ceramic Uranium oxide gas that has been affecting millions of innocents in Europe, the Middle East and other parts of Asia, the United States, Somalia, and other nations of the world? Let's all do as Sister Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D. does and let our conscience dictate our next actions.

The United Nations is very clear that "Depleted Uranium" is considered illegal under international law. Its use is considered a crime against humanity.
See http://prop1.org/2000/du/resource/000310un.htm

In the words of Izaak Walton,

"The person that loses their conscience has nothing left worth keeping."
----------------------------------------------------------------

Depleted Uranium - The Ultimate Dirty Bomb -10 min.
Youtube Video - Dr. Rokke, Leuren Moret

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg2NHfoC2pc&mode=related
----------------------------------------
Trap Rock URL

http://traprockpeace.org/
http://www.traprockpeace.org/depleted_uranium.html
http://traprockpeace.org/WBAIDepletedUranium.mp3
----------------------------------------

BODY BURDEN -- HUMAN CONTAMINATION
http://www.ewg.org/issues/siteindex/issues.php?issueid=5004

Environmental Working Group URL
http://www.ewg.org/

Radiation & Public Health
http://www.radiation.org/index.html

RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT--DR. BERTELL

http://www.ratical.com/radiation/NRBE/NRadBioEffects.html
------------------------------------
"More worrisome is Dr. Abram Petkau’s observation that it takes only 700 millirads of protracted radiation (from external or internal sources) to lyse (break) the cell membrane. By protracted, I mean over a period of time, instead of all at once. In the absence of antioxidant enzyme protection, such as superoxide dismutase and catalase, a mere 10-20 millirads were required to destroy the cell membrane. P.S., we’re all deficient in antioxidant enzymes because there’s much more radiation-induced free radical damage than nature intended, thanks to the nuclear industry. "
--------------------------------------
United States: 215 atmospheric tests + 815 underground tests = 1,030
USSR: 219 atmospheric tests + 496 underground tests = 715
UK: 21 atmospheric tests + 24 underground tests = 45
France: 50 atmospheric tests + 160 underground tests = 210
China: 23 atmospheric tests + 22 underground tests = 45

The grand total of global atmospheric tests = 528

Source: Page 52, "Atomic Audit, the Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear
Weapons Since 1940," Stephen Schwartz, Editor, Brookings Institution Press,
Washington D.C., 1998.
-------------------------------------------------

*See also: NucNews Links and Archives (by date) at :
http://nucnews.net * (Posted for educational and research
purposes only, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107).

theroyprocess
FYI
http://tinyurl.com/ys8may [Indybay]

Despite Continuing Threats
DU Expert Pushes on with Pursuit of Truth

By Brian Covert
Independent Journalist
August 6, 2007 San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/08/06/18439097.php

KYOTO, JAPAN - If it seems that Dr. Asaf Durakovic's visits to Japan are
always preceded by violent threats and harassment back home in North
America, it is only because that is a constant reality for him.

Just before coming to Japan last year to appeal the deadly dangers of
depleted uranium to the Japanese government and public, his family received
a spate of threats by telephone back in the U.S. His latest Japan visit, his
third to this country, was preceded earlier this year by the ransacking of
his Washington D.C. home.

"Nothing was stolen from the house, but every single paper in my house was
scrutinized," Durakovic, 64, said in a recent interview here. "And I don't
know who did it. I have no idea. It was reported to the police [but] the
police were helpless" in finding the culprits. The windows of his car, he
adds, were smashed out earlier this year at his home in Canada.

And that's not counting what Durakovic calls the "betrayal" of the
organization he heads, the Toronto-based Uranium Medical Research Centre, by
outside infiltrators over the past year or the mysterious hit-and-run
incident in Toronto that targeted some of his colleagues in front of a
church on a quiet Sunday morning.

These anonymous acts of violence over the past year, he says, are the kind
of unfortunate price that all conscientious scientists throughout history
have had to pay in trying to get the truth out - in his case, the truth
about depleted uranium (DU), a lethal waste product of the uranium
enrichment process that has become a critical part of modern-day warfare.
Many doctors and scientists have joined the soup kitchen because of speaking
up against the obvious injustices that are going on in the world," Durakovic
said. He says he intends to keep on talking publicly about DU despite the
ongoing pressures to quit.

He was recently in Kyoto, the ancient Japanese capital, to do just that
before an audience of a couple hundred students and scholars at the
prestigious Doshisha University. His speaking appearances are generally
warmly received by the public in Japan, if not ignored by the Japanese
government and mainstream media.

Durakovic's troubles, of course, date back far beyond this year or last: As
a military insider, he had served at the rank of colonel in the U.S. Army
Medical Corps during the 1990-91 "Operation Desert Shield" phase of the
Persian Gulf War attack on Iraqi military forces. Upon returning to the
States, he was appointed chief of nuclear medicine at the Department of
Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Wilmington, Delaware. He recalls that a
group of American veterans who had served in Iraq were referred to him with
apparent traces of uranium in their bodies. Durakovic ordered diagnoses on
the soldiers and the tests, he says, came back positive.

The test records later were supposedly lost somewhere along the line by U.S
military officials; Durakovic then did more tests and came up with the same
positive results. "So it was obvious the [U.S.] government lied," Durakovic
told this writer in an interview in Osaka, Japan last year.

The pressure on Durakovic to immediately cease his testing of American
veterans for depleted uranium poisoning in their bodies was steadily raised,
including from the chief of the military hospital where he worked. Durakovic
was fired from the hospital in February 1997. He never got his job back. He
went on that year to found the nonprofit Uranium Medical Research Centre in
Toronto to continue testing for depleted uranium and to challenge official
claims of DU's minimal risks to humans and the environment. His team has
since gone to Afghanistan and Iraq to collect and test DU samples directly
from civilians, as well as from U.S. military veterans who are now
Stateside.

Over the past year, Durakovic and his colleagues have continued presenting
their findings at scientific gatherings and public forums around the world.
Durakovic himself last year won the "2004 Nuclear-Free Future Education
Award" in India in recognition of his work.

His team's tests for DU contamination continue to come up positive, he says.
The evidence has hit especially close to home for Durakovic: Two of his UMRC
field staff members fell ill after spending a few days in Samawah, Iraq,
collecting DU samples in 2003. One of them, Tedd Weyman, remains nearly
incapacitated to this day with severe respiratory problems. "It is alarming
because he [Weyman] only stayed in the area for eight days," Durakovic said.
"Now, I'm asking everybody to use their common sense and think of what might
have happened to people who were stationed there for three, four, six
months."

That includes the hundreds of Japanese Self-Defense Force soldiers still
stationed in Samawah, the same area in Iraq where Durakovic's team had
confirmed DU contamination. An estimated 500 Japanese soldiers recently
departed for Samawah with great fanfare from an SDF base in Itami, Hyogo
Prefecture in western Japan. How DU will affect those and other Japanese
soldiers now based in Iraq - ostensibly to help shore up the U.S.
occupation - remains to be seen, as the Japanese press and even opposition
political parties are mostly mute on the subject of depleted uranium. But
Durakovic says he would "very much appreciate an opportunity to be
introduced to some of those [Japanese] veterans" and hopefully test them for
DU someday.

His fight to reveal the truth about DU, he maintains, is not about merely
confronting the Pentagon or the U.S. Department of Defense, but also
standing up to what he calls the "political-industrial complex" of other
countries - such as Britain and Canada - that he sees as stonewalling or
trying to whitewash the facts and data surrounding depleted uranium.

"The Department of National Defence of Canada conducted a worthless study
[of DU] in which millions of dollars were spent, using the wrong population,
the wrong methodology and wrong specimens to come to the wrong conclusions,"
Durakovic said. "And their wrong conclusions were that there is no risk of
DU because they found nothing. But our team found DU, our team found sick
people, our team found catastrophic dimensions of radioactive warfare. .And
I asked the people from Canada: 'Why didn't you use a washing machine to
measure uranium isotopes? Because your methodology is as equally insensitive
as a washing machine'."

If Durakovic has faith in anything, it is in the power of science to rise
above all forms of politics. "Eventually, the truth of scientific
information will prevail. Political parties rise and fall. Governments and
kingdoms rise and fall. Swords and crowns can be dug [from] the mud of dirty
rivers But scientific facts will always remain unchallenged."

"That is what we have to encounter today," he adds. "In the unpleasant
reality of radioactive warfare, somebody has to be taking the consequences
for the work that is not according to the tastes of the current political
opinions." His plans for the coming year include continued testing of the
remaining 120-plus DU samples his team has taken from people in Iraq, as
well as DU testing of civilians in Port Hope, Canada and Padukah, Kentucky
in the U.S. - places in North America with their own histories of nuclear
contamination and cover-up.

So for now, despite all the threats and harassment, Dr. Asaf Durakovic
pushes on with his DU research, undeterred by the ideological winds of time:
"We were not afraid of the communist secret police. I lived in communist
Yugoslavia and I was not afraid of that. So I'm not going to be afraid of
free countries either."

Brian Ohkubo Covert is an independent journalist based in Hyogo, Japan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Title U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research and educational purposes.
theroyprocess
FYI
NukeNet Anti-Nuclear Network (nukenet@energyjustice.net)

Media Release
7 September 2007

Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake - Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant

NGO's demand the IAEA stop misleading the international community and
TEPCO improve transparency

NGOs today demanded that there be greater international accountability
from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and that Tokyo
Electric Power Company (TEPCO) improve its transparency surrounding the
impact of the Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake on the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear
Power Plant.

In a letter to the IAEA and TEPCO, Citizens' Nuclear Information
Center, Green Action, and Greenpeace Japan criticized the IAEA Expert
Mission to the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant for making
misleading statements about the impact of the earthquake on the plant1.
They also criticized Philippe Jamet, head of the Expert Mission, for
saying it would take "months or a year" to put the plant back into
operation, even though a careful reading of the Expert Mission's 17
August 2007 report shows that there are strong grounds for believing
that the plant can never be operated again.

The groups strongly supported the Expert Mission's goal of sharing the
findings and lessons learned with the international nuclear community.
However, they pointed out that there is a major barrier to the
achievement of this goal. That is that Tokyo Electric Power Company
(TEPCO) does not publish most of its reports in English.

The Citizens' Nuclear Information Center (CNIC) contacted TEPCO to ask
if it intended to translate a technical report published on its
Japanese web site on 10 August. TEPCO replied it did not. CNIC then
took the initiative of translating charts on neutron flux and reactor
pressure and publishing them on the following page

http://cnic.jp/english/topics/safety/earth...ort10aug07.html

The TEPCO report contains key information that will be useful to anyone
with a technical interest in the impact of the Chuetsu-Oki earthquake.

The groups wrote to TEPCO calling on it to publish on its web site full
translations of the technical reports relating to the Chuetsu-Oki
Earthquake which have been published by TEPCO in Japanese. If TEPCO can
provide such information in English to the IAEA, there is no reason why
it cannot provide it to a wider audience. Only when sufficient basic
data is available in English will the international community be able
to independently analyze the findings and the lessons learned.

Contacts

Philip WHITE, International Liaison Officer, Citizens' Nuclear
Information Center (Tokyo, Japan)
Phone: 81-3-3357-3800
Email 1: cnic@nifty.com Email 2: white@cnic.jp

Aileen Mioko SMITH, Director, Green Action (Kyoto, Japan)
Phone: 075-701-7223 / 090-3620-9251
Email: amsmith@gol.com

Jun HOSHIKAWA, Executive Director, Greenpeace Japan (Tokyo, Japan)
Phone: 81-3-5338-9800
Email: jun.hoshikawa@jp.greenpeace.org

1. Letters to IAEA and TEPCO dated 7 September, 2007 available on the
following web pages:

http://cnic.jp/english/topics/safety/earth...iaea7sep07.html

http://cnic.jp/english/topics/safety/earth...epco7sep07.html
______________________________________________________________________
Subscribe/Unsubscribe Here: http://www.energyjustice.net/nukenet/
Change your settings or access the archives at:
http://mail.energyjustice.net/mailman/list...ergyjustice.net
Magmak1
Thank you.
theroyprocess
Let them eat DU...forevermore!

There are over 430 nuclear reactors world wide. Of
those, 104 in the USA. They all make atom bomb
and dirty bomb elements. And many hidden agendas!

North Korea showed the value of extortion to the
world going nuclear. The big stick is the highest
political tool.

These reactors are 30, 40, 50 years old. They are
not designed to use mixed oxide fuel (MOX). It
is dangerous and will lead to the next Chernobyl
magnitude meltdown and a cascading global
depression. Will our governments use it as an
excuse to limit freedom? All machinery breaks
down in time. Nuclear reactors too!

From 1945 on...everyone has man-made radiation
in their DNA and each generation adds to their body
burden. The perfect killer, invisible, imperceptible.
No one is immune.
rla
Is nuclear power and hydrogen power the same, in this context?
theroyprocess
Ria,
Pollution from nuclear power is the longest lasting! We can use wave power, the oceans, to generate electricity and/or hydrogen fuel cells
for world wide distribution. It is very different.
theroyprocess
Atom bombs are packed in DU and lethal radioactive fallout
is still floating around the planet up in the atmosphere.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_7365890
The Salt Lake Tribune
"Exposed" Review

Atomic testing 'Exposed' lays bare atomic pain, grief The play, ending tonight, gathers downwinders' stories of death, disease By Brandon Griggs

Salt Lake Tribune Article Last Updated:11/04/2007 12:26:39 AM MDT

They come at the end of every performance of "Exposed," Plan-B Theatre's provocative drama about the human consequences of nuclear-weapons testing. Written by Utah journalist and author Mary Dickson, the play gathers sobering personal stories from "downwinders," or people exposed to radioactive fallout from nuclear explosions at the Nevada Test Site.

When "Exposed" premiered last month, the list contained 53 names of people, most of them Utahns, who died of cancers and other diseases their families believe were caused by nuclear fallout. Since then, producers of the play, which ends its sold-out run tonight at the Rose Wagner Performing Arts Center, have invited audience members to add names to a list on the wall by the theater's entrance.

As theatergoers contributed new names, director Jerry Rapier incorporated them into the play by typing them up and giving them to his actors to read at the end of the next performance. As of Friday afternoon, the list had grown to 131 names.

"It's been really heartbreaking, all the stories I've been hearing. I've heard people say, 'I added both my parents,' " says Dickson, who has been hugged by sobbing theatergoers after performances. "I keep finding more and more [names]. And the sad thing is, it's just a tiny fraction of them."

Dickson based "Exposed" on actual people, including herself and her sister Ann Dickson DeBirk, who died of lupus in 2001 and whose name is the last one read at the play's end. Many of Dickson's lines are lifted verbatim from government documents, interviews and personal conversations.

At a time when low-level radioactive waste is being buried in Utah's west desert and Utah lawmakers are considering whether to allow the state's first nuclear power plant, "Exposed" dramatizes some 50 years of American history to probe the shadowy legacy of nuclear testing. Between 1951 and 1992, the U.S. government detonated 928 nuclear bombs in southern Nevada, sending radioactive particles into the atmosphere.

In 1990, Congress passed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), which paid $50,000 to each person who contracted certain cancers and other serious diseases that might have resulted from living downwind of aboveground nuclear-weapon tests. In Utah, only residents of 10 southern counties are eligible for payments, although research suggests that radiation fallout spread widely across the state and beyond.

More than 27,000 Americans have made claims under RECA. So far, almost 19,000 of them, including downwinders, uranium miners and test-site workers, have received government payments totaling $1.25 billion. Meanwhile, pressure continues in Washington to extend the fund to more people in more places. One bill in Congress would allow downwinders in Idaho and Montana to apply for payments.

By speaking aloud the names of deceased downwinders at the end of "Exposed," and encouraging theatergoers to add more, the play's producers have created a living memorial to the dead not unlike an AIDS quilt or a recital of the names of 9/11 victims. As an emotional coda to the play, the list of names also connects audiences viscerally with a complex issue.

"It's an invitation to make it personal, which I think is effective," said Julie Jensen, a Salt Lake City playwright who added the names of her father and two aunts - all of whom grew up in southern Utah and died of cancer - to the list after attending Thursday's performance. "It's all very palpable. On the whole, for me, it worked."

Although the play ends its Salt Lake City run with tonight's performance, its influence will likely be felt beyond Utah. Rapier, Plan-B Theatre's producing director, said he has heard from theater companies in Chicago, Sacramento and the Bay Area that want to stage "Exposed." So the drama's requiem for the dead may continue to grow.
---------------------------
*See also: NucNews Links and Archives (by date) at :
http://nucnews.net * (Posted for educational and research
purposes only, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107).
veritas
From http://www.democraticunderground.com/discu...ess=102x3274801

QUOTE
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/ISL146529.htm
Afghans to probe whether U.S. used depleted uranium
19 Apr 2008 12:30:53 GMT
Source: Reuters
By Tan Ee Lyn


KABUL, April 19 (Reuters) - The Afghan government plans to investigate whether the United States used depleted uranium during its invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and if it might be linked to malformed babies born afterwards.

Parts of Afghanistan, particularly the mountainous region of Tora Bora in the east -- the suspected hideout of al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden -- came under heavy U.S. bombing in late 2001 when the Taliban regime was ousted.

Depleted uranium is a heavy metal used in some weapons that can pierce armour. It has small levels of radioactivity associated with it.

Cases of malformed babies delivered in the heavily bombed Afghan areas have come to light, Faizullah Kakar, Afghan deputy public health minister for technical affairs said on Saturday, citing an unnamed U.S. expert.

Kakar told Reuters the Afghan government planned to investigate the matter.

"We have decided to do a study to see what is going on. We will take samples of soil, rocks, water in different areas where the war had taken place in the past and look in the same area to see if there is an excess of malformed babies," Kakar said.

"It's then that we can tell you what is going on. But until then it is still speculation," he said.

"In Afghanistan, we have so many problems with nutritional deficiency, like folic acid. So it's difficult to tell if it's due to depleted uranium or due to some nutritional problems or some other genetic issues," he said.

Asked if the United States had told Afghanistan if depleted uranium was used during the war, Kakar said: "They have not told us that they have used it, but my source said it was used."

Kakar said he would like to see the study done as soon as possible, but the Afghan government, which largely relies on Western aid and troops, needed to find ways of funding it. (Editing by Sayed Salahuddin and Charles Dick)
veritas
QUOTE
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2008/04/29/are...72767559743.txt

Crews moving contaminated sand from ship to rail
Tuesday, April 29, 2008 9:07 PM PDT
By Erik Olson (48 comments)


TDN.com The Daily News Online - Serving The Lower Columbia. WA

Longshoremen should finish unloading 6,700 tons of sand contaminated with depleted uranium and lead Tuesday afternoon, said Chad Hyslop, spokesman for the disposal company American Ecology.

The BBC Alabama arrived at the port Saturday afternoon with the 306 containers carrying the contaminated sand from Camp Doha, a U.S. Army base in Kuwait. The sand was packaged in bags designed to transport hazardous waste.

Longshoremen unloaded the containers in two shifts Sunday, then two more Monday, Hyslop said. They wore standard safety gear, and dust protection equipment and respirators were available, he said.

However, no one has opted to wear the respirators, he said.

“It’s gone real smooth,” Hyslop said.

Half of the containers will be loaded onto 76 rail cars and transported to an American Ecology disposal site in Idaho. The other half will remain at the port until the trains return to haul them to Idaho. The containers all will be at the disposal site in Idaho within 15 to 30 days, Hyslop said.

State Department of Health personnel are at the port to test radiation levels and to ensure none of the sand spills, Hyslop said. U.S. Customs agents also were on hand to inspect the cargo, he said.

The sand became contaminated with low levels of depleted uranium following a fire at Camp Doha during the first Gulf War in 1991, according to Hyslop and Army sources. The Army then discovered potentially hazardous levels of lead in the shipment.

Hyslop said he’s been happy with the job the port and other government agencies have done in helping with the transport of the material.

“We’re extremely pleased and impressed with the outstanding professionalism of the Port of Longview,” he said.

RELATED STORIES

April 15: Contaminated sand from Gulf War to pass through Longview
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2008/04/15/are...7d443239356.txt

April 22: Arrival of toxic sand delayed
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2008/04/22/are...f4740047164.txt

April 24: Kuwaiti sand bound for Longview has high levels of lead; extended stay likely
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2008/04/25/are...cd759120435.txt
veritas
QUOTE
http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/a/181.html

European Parliament passes far reaching DU resolution in landslide vote

The European Parliament has passed its fourth and most far-reaching resolution yet against the use of uranium weapons. MEPs have called for an EU and NATO-wide moratorium and global ban.

22 May 2008 - ICBUW

The resolution reflects an increasingly outspoken position from the European Parliament on the issue of uranium weapons. It begins with a call for EU member states to submit reports on DU to the UN Secretary General in line with last year's General Assembly resolution and classifies DU along with cluster bombs and landmines as inhumane. In response to the wealth of new information on DU's threat to health, it then requests that the European Council and Commission launch studies into areas where DU has been used.

It then calls for a halt to the deployment of military and civilian personnel in areas where DU has been used and urges member states to provide information on DU hazards to service personnel and civilian organisations.

The resolution goes on to request that an environmental inventory recording the use of uranium weapons is set up and that a financial mechanism is put in place for victim assistance in contaminated areas.

EU and NATO member states are finally urged to impose a moratorium on DU's use and to redouble efforts that may lead to a global ban. Moreover it calls on the EU to take a lead in working towards this goal if a link is made between uranium weapons and ill health is proved.

The resolution was proposed by the Greens/European Free Alliance. ICBUW acted in an advisory role during the drafting of the text.

The outcome of the final vote:

Total votes 521.

In favour: 491
Against: 18
Abstentions: 12
veritas
QUOTE
http://www.truthout.org/article/the-depleted-uranium-threat

The Depleted Uranium Threat
Wednesday 13 August 2008

by: Thomas D. Williams, t r u t h o u t | Truthout Original Report


..."The Defense Department is refusing to comply with orders or sign contracts to clean up 11 hazardous waste sites, including one in Hawaii, and has asked the White House and Justice Department to intervene on its behalf." - The Associated Press, July 1, 2008

While attempting to act as the planet's nuclear watchdogs, the United States and Great Britain have become two of the world's largest, cancer-causing radiated dust and rusty depleted uranium projectile polluters.

Using tanks and planes, the US and British military have fired hundreds of tons of radioactive depleted uranium munitions (DU) while fighting the first Gulf War, the Balkans War, and the more recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. For two decades, successive US and British government leadership has done little overall to clean up the hazardous war waste. And, when repeatedly asked questions about it, spokespersons for Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown and US President George W. Bush, as well as the two presidential candidates, Senator Barack Obama (D-Illinois) and Senator John McCain (R-Arizona), didn't respond to a large number of e-mails and telephone calls over a month's time.

Ironically, while firing this nuclear by-product all over Iraq, Afghanistan and the former Yugoslavia, both Britain and the US regularly criticized and put financial or political pressure on Iran, Syria, North Korea and Pakistan for developing nuclear weapons. Of those four countries, only Pakistan is said to possess depleted uranium munitions, but their military forces have not been notorious for using them...

MORE...

(last paragraph) A Government Accountability Office investigation two years ago found the military's and the Department of Energy's handling of depleted uranium and other nuclear waste a fiscal quagmire to clean up. In the United States, DU munitions manufacturing operations have created numerous hazardous-waste concerns. The military has had to deal with firing range cleanups of DU, while the Energy Department is responsible for oversight of nuclear installations. "The nation's military installations and nuclear weapons production facilities," said the GAO, "have accumulated many types of waste and contamination over the years. The federal government estimated its environmental liability to clean up this waste at
$249 billion in fiscal year 2004, representing the federal government's third-largest reported liability. It represents a significant future outflow of funds at the same time as many other competing demands for federal dollars, but is currently not auditable," the GAO said.
jeffmoskin
Facts:

There are 6.5 BILLION people on this planet.

America has 5% of them, and we use 25% of the planet's energy.

The other 95% wants to live like Americans, so we are looking at an enormous increase in global energy usage.

Oil is at peak; gas is close behind. The good news is that we have lots of coal. The bad news is that we might have to use it.

That leaves nuclear.

Read up on the advancements that have been made since the first reactors of the 1950s. They are ten times more efficient, produce far less waste material, are intrinsically safe (no Chernobyl style RBMK reactor has or ever will be built in the USA), and produce no greenhouse gases. Check out the CANDU (Canadian reactor which uses non-enriched uranium), or the Westinghouse and GE modular Phase III and IV fast breeder reactors. Try Google.

Unless the world wants to retreat to stone-age living, we are going to have to get used to the "N" word.
theroyprocess
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NucNews/message/28644
Old Nuclear Cash Cows Exposed

ISIS Press Release 24/09/08
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/OldNuclearCashCowsExposed.php

The “nuclear renaissance” may be a convenient charade to distract
people while industry milks the old nuclear cash cows to drain the
public coffers and endanger the nation Dr. Mae-Wan Ho <clip>
---------------------------------
http://uruknet.info/?p=m47430&hd=&size=1&l=e
Marine Speaks Out on Using Depleted Uranium Munitions in Iraq
September 22, 2008

Quotes from this video:

…this is the Agent Orange of this occupation. This weapon has no
purpose in Iraq granted this was during the initial invasion. So I,
maybe, can understand its deployment. But, let’s be clear here
depleted uranium is an anti-armor weapon… the Iraqis do not have
armor. They don’t have tanks. They don’t have bombers. Why are we
using this? And again I urge you to do the research yourselves. I can
quickly say that we’re using this because it’s a way to get rid of
atomic waste. We do not know what to do with that.

We’re poisoning our soldiers, we are poisoning the people of Iraq,
but make no mistake we are poisoning the people of the world. I can
test every single person in this room and I can find depleted uranium
in your hair.

The VA has continually denied my request to be tested for depleted
uranium. This letter clearly shows that they’re saying a test doesn’t
even exist. And I will say for the record, a test does exist, it’s
the wrong test. It’s the urinalysis that’s used to detect exposure,
immediate exposure. The problem with depleted uranium is that these
particles dig deep within your body, and you will not find them in
your urine after a couple days. You need a very expensive test… one
the VA us certainly not willing to pay for. But I would also like to
point out that the VA does recognize the danger of depleted uranium,
while they might not want to test for it, or talk about it, or give
us any briefings on it.

That round on impact aerosols and vaporizes and these particles go up
in the air, and that’s why I was saying I can test every single one
of you and find it in your hair. These particles blow up into the
atmosphere and are disseminated all around the entire globe. They
have found depleted uranium on the skin of NASA vehicles in space. We
are changing the entire genome of our planet: human beings, cats and
dogs, plants. We are changing the genetic makeup of our planet by
using these munitions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
--------------------------
YouTube Video - Poison DUst - Part 1 of 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJftO_nxOQY...feature=related

YouTube Video - Poison DUst - Part 2 of 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbaVp8Avj70...feature=related

YouTube Video - Poison DUst - Part 3 of 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Snp0wkVhTMM...feature=related

YouTube Video - Poison DUst - Part 4 of 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZEpJETLNPQ...feature=related
----------------------
Video - Would you like some nuclear waste with your champagne?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbRP-QfeI-8...feature=related
theroyprocess
New radiation data.
-----------------------
Radiation Science That Will Never Make TIME or Newsweek

The following is a September 9 newsletter from the Low Level Radiation Campaign http://www.llrc.org .

What is unique (and righteous) about this small group of non-compromised scientists is that they study and discuss in depth *all* radioactive pollution, regardless of the source... be it nuclear power plants, Uranium weapons production and manufacturing plants, military or national weapons laboratory operations, outdoor "testing" and firing.

In other words, the Low Level Radiation Campaign www.llrc.org goes the full distance. These scientists go courageously where others do not (dare not?) go. So let's all do whatever we can to help support this organization's efforts. The Low Level Radiation Campaign depends on donations in order to keep operating. And even if we don't have a few bucks to throw their way, we can certainly forward this newsletter along!

Why is the research of the Low Level Radiation Campaign so important? The deliberate radioactive contamination of the US - and the rest of the world - is only growing over time. Radiological effects on the human body are cumulative and will be passed along to future generations, both in our genes and in our environment. Thus, continued studies are necessary in order to know the long-term implications of these damages to our health.

Granted, on a personal level, for those of us in middle age and later years, this might not seem that important. But to our kids and grand kids, nieces and nephews, and all of their kids on down the line? This rampant, continued onslaught of radioactive pollution now on the up-swing with the "Nukuler Resurgence" being pushed upon us, along with the manufacture of more Uranium Wars in a growing number of countries... is most certain to impact our descendants in a huge - and most tragically unfortunate - way.

The invisible radioactive contamination of the US is certainly Uncle Sam's (and our allies') "best kept dirty secret." Our federal government has had a more-than-curious, pathological Love Affair with the widespread, liberal use of radionuclides as an environmental contaminant.

How long are we going to maintain the role of helpless victim, begging our own government to "Please stop radioactively poisoning us and deliberately contaminating our kids' air, water, and soil, Uncle Sam?" Certainly, if a greater number of people find out what's going on... those in power will be unable to
ignore us all!

Beyond the immorality of bombarding our environment (and lungs) with radioactive gasses, nor is this pollution justified on a legal basis. Actions such as toxic, radioactive outdoor "testing" are a violation of basic human rights of US citizens under international law. http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_26286.shtml

As I see it? The least we can do is spread the word - and let everyone else know that the continuous bombardment of chemically toxic and radioactive emissions into our air, water, and soil is simply NOT Okay!

With gratitude for all you do - and best wishes to all,

Cathy Garger
------------------
New Scientist report on Uranium risks compromises ICRP

ICRP model in trouble

A New Scientist report on Uranium toxicity reveals a massive gap in the scientific modelling of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). There are massive implications for all aspects of nuclear policy and Uranium weaponry.

"Secondary Photoelectron effect"

The dangers of Uranium may have little to do with its inherent radioactivity. The Low Level Radiation Campaign's Dr. Chris Busby has proposed that genetic damage is caused by the interaction of natural gamma and other radiation fields with Uranium or any element of high atomic number. The impact of the gamma causes localised showers of ionisations close to particles and even single atoms of elements of high atomic number. Research by Busby in conjunction with Pr. Ewald Schnug, a colleague at Germany's Federal Agricultural Research Centre, is about to be published [see footnote].

All elements absorb gamma radiation and re-emit its energy in the form of secondary photo-electrons. Their ability to do this varies with the fourth power of the atomic number of the element; Uranium absorbs gamma rays 585365 times more effectively than water does. The shower of localised ionisations caused by the secondary photo-electrons creates a mechanism for genetic damage which is ignored by the conventional model of radiation risk. (The arithmetic is in LLRC's journal Radioactive Times April 2008 page 8. www.llrc.org/rat/subrat/rat72.pdf)

In 2003 Busby reported this "Secondary Photoelectron effect" to the British Government's Committee Examining Radiation Risk of Internal Emitters (CERRIE). It was one of the many important topics omitted by the CERRIE Majority Report. Subsequently Busby published two papers [see footnote] and described the effect to the UK Ministry of Defence Depleted Uranium Oversight Board and CoRWM (Committee on Radioactive Waste Management).

Heavy metal poisoning

The New Scientist has discussed the Secondary Photoelectron effect only in relation to Depleted Uranium, although it has far wider relevance. It has potential to explain why heavy metals are toxic. Heavy metal toxicity exists despite wide differences in chemistry; until now no-one has understood the reason.

Uranium DNA affinity

Uranium itself has a high affinity for the phosphates in the DNA molecule and it is known that, at small total body burdens of Uranium, a very high proportion of it will be on the DNA. Meditated by the Secondary Photoelectron effect, Uranium focuses the energy of natural gamma radiation onto DNA. This has the potential to explain observed high risks of genetic diseases associated with nuclear facilities and events like Chernobyl which are ignored by the ICRP and sneered at by the pro-nuclear International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Health Organisation (which has to defer to IAEA in matters of radiation and health).

Policy implications

The mining, processing, use and disposal of Uranium must now be seen as creating health hazards far greater than predicted by the ICRP's out of date modelling. There are extremely important policy implications for nuclear power, disposal of radioactive waste, and nuclear weapons (including depleted Uranium and new generations of weapons containing other types of Uranium).

As LLRC has said since 1992, the effects of other types of radioactive pollution have probably been underestimated too, but it now seems that Uranium is the dominant problem.

New light on Busby's "Second Event theory"

In the last 20 years Chris Busby has proposed his "Second Event theory" as a possible explanation of how radioactive elements that decay more than once (Strontium 90 is an example) may have a greater effect on genetic mutation. A first radioactive disintegration that hits a cell without killing it forces the cell to repair itself. If a second disintegration hits the same cell during the repair process, which takes a few hours, it may cause a mutation that the cell cannot repair. This is all in Wings of Death
(http://www.llrc.org/wings/wingspage.htm)

Supporters of nuclear power have attacked the theory, not least because they said radiation could not initiate the repair process in cells, but in the New Scientist article the ICRP's Hans-Georg Menzel accepts that "double hits of energy are known to be the most damaging to cells." The Majority Report of CERRIE denied this in 2004 after long arguments. See the Minority Report (http://www.llrc.org/wobblyscience/subtopic/cerrie.htm) for the true state of the debate on the Second Event theory.

The Secondary Photoelectron effect is now seen to be another case of the general Second Event theory, describing how sequences of radiation events can be concentrated into very localised cellular targets. These considerations make nonsense of the conventional model of radiation biology, which views radiation in terms of average energy transfer across large volumes of tissue. The old concept of "dose" is now useful only for those exposure regimes where the radiation truly is well-averaged. The regulation of radioactivity in the environment is about to enter a new phase in which "ionisation density" will be the vital parameter.

Compton scattering

In the New Scientist article Mark Hill of Oxford University is reported as saying that Compton scattering would reduce the importance of the secondary photo-electron effect. However, Hill only discusses high energy gamma; the low energy part of the natural gamma spectrum will create relatively high ionisation densities with a correspondingly enhanced probability of causing double hits to DNA.
The New Scientist article in full is only accessible to subscribers
but it is free on http://www.nuwinfo.se/tickell20080903newscientist.html
and http://www.pharmacychoice.com/News/article...rticle_ID=93531

The Low Level Radiation Campaign plays a key role in all this. LLRC funds much of Dr. Busby's research. It was LLRC's publicity material that alerted Professor Schnug to Dr. Busby's existence, and our office put them in touch with each other. It was our journal Radioactive Times that alerted New Scientist to the imminent publication of Busby and Schnug's new paper.

LLRC does all this and much more on a microscopic budget, but we need money. Please consider a donation. http://www.llrc.org/donation.htm

1. "Advanced Biochemical and Biophysical Aspects of Uranium Contamination". Chris Busby and Ewald Schnug: Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Bundesallee 50, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany in "Loads and Fate of Fertilizer Derived Uranium", pp. xx-xx Edited by L.J. De Kok & E. Schnug © 2007 Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands
2 Busby C (2005) Depleted Uranium weapons, Metal Particles, and Radiation Dose European Journal of Biology and Bioelectromagnetics Vol 1 No 1 p 82-93 www.ebab.eu.com
3. Busby C (2005) Does Uranium Contamination amplify natural background radiation dose to DNA?
European Journal of Biology and Bioelectromagnetics Vol 1 No 2 p 120-131 www.ebab.eu.com
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.