Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Looking Back on 40 Years of Occupation
Common Ground Common Sense > National & International News > Op-Ed Articles from the Mainstream Media > Op-Ed Articles from the Mainstream Media Archive
Snuffysmith
Looking Back on 40 Years of Occupation
Digg. Email Print

<h6 class="date">Posted on Jun 3, 2007</h6> AP Photo / Emilio Morenatti With part of Israel’s security barrier in the background, a Palestinian woman shops for produce near the Kalandia checkpoint between Jerusalem and the West Bank city of Ramallah in April 2005.

By Chris Hedges

Israel captured and occupied the Gaza Strip and the West Bank 40 years ago this week. The victory was celebrated as a great triumph, at once tripling the size of the land under Israeli control, including East Jerusalem. It was, however, a Pyrrhic victory. As the occupation stretched over the decades, it transformed and deformed Israeli society. It led Israel to abandon the norms and practices of a democratic society until, in the name of national security, it began to routinely accept the brutal violence of occupation and open discrimination and abuse of Palestinians, including the torture of prisoners and collective reprisals for Palestinians attacks. Palestinian neighborhoods, olive groves and villages were, in the name of national security, bulldozed into the ground.

Israel’s image has shifted from that of a heroic, open society set amid a sea of despotic regimes to that of an international pariah. Israel’s West Bank separation barrier, built ostensibly to keep out Palestinian bombers, has also been used to swallow huge tracts of the West Bank into Israel. Palestinian towns are ringed by Israeli checkpoints. Major roads in the West Bank are reserved for Israeli settlers. The U.N. estimates that about half the West Bank is now off-limits to Palestinians. And every week there are new reports of Palestinian produce that is held up until it rots, pregnant women giving birth in cars because they cannot get to hospitals, and even senseless and avoidable deaths, such as one young woman who died recently when she couldn’t get through a checkpoint to her kidney dialysis treatment.

"We are raising commanders who are policemen,” former Israeli General Amiram Levine told the newspaper Maariv. “We ask them to excel at the checkpoint. What does it means to excel at the checkpoint? It means being enough of a bastard to delay a pregnant woman from getting to the hospital.”

The occupation was benign at the beginning. Israelis crossed into Palestinian territory to buy cheap vegetables, eat at local restaurants, spend the weekend in the desert oasis of Jericho and get their cars fixed. The Palestinians were a pool of cheap labor and by the mid-1980s, 40 percent of the Palestinian workforce was employed in Israel. The Palestinians flowed over the border to the shops and beaches of Tel Aviv. But the second-class status of Palestinians, growing repression by Israeli authorities in the West Bank and Gaza and festering poverty saw Palestinians, most of them too young to remember the moment of occupation, rise up in December 1987 to launch six years of street protests. The uprising eventually led to a peace accord between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization led by Yasir Arafat. Arafat, who had spent most of his life in exile, returned in triumph to Gaza.

The Oslo Accords that followed momentarily heralded a new era, a moment of hope. I was in Gaza when they were signed. The Gaza Strip was awash in a giddy optimism. Palestinian businessmen who had made their fortunes abroad returned to help build the new Palestinian state. The radical Islamists seemed to shrink away. Palestinian women threw off their head scarves and beauty salons sprouted on city streets. There was a brief and shining sense that life could be normal, free from strife and violence, that finally Palestinians had a future. But it all swiftly turned sour. The 1995 assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, coupled with mounting draconian restrictions on Palestinians to prevent them from entering Israel and keep them in submission, led to another uprising in 2000. This one, which I also covered for The New York Times, was far more violent. This latest uprising has led to the deaths of more than 4,300 Palestinians and 1,100 Israelis. It ushered in an Israeli policy that saw Jewish settlers relocated from Gaza. Gaza was then sealed off like a vast prison. Israel also began to build a security barrier—at a cost of about $ 1 million per mile—in the West Bank. When it is done, the barrier is expected to incorporate 40 percent of Palestinian land into the Israeli state.

Israeli air strikes have, over the past year, decimated the infrastructure in Gaza, destroying bridges, power stations and civilian administration buildings. The breakdown in law and order, coupled with the growing desperation in Gaza, has triggered an internecine conflict between Hamas and Fatah. There are some 200 Palestinians who have died in clashes and street fighting between the two factions during the past year—more than one-third of those killed by Israel during the same period.

The Israeli abuses have been well documented, not only by international human rights organizations, but Israeli human rights groups such as B’Tselem. On June 4, 2007, Amnesty International released a new 45-page report called “Enduring Occupation: Palestinians Under Siege in the West Bank,” which again illustrates the devastating impact of four decades of Israeli military occupation. The report documents the relentless expansion of unlawful settlements on occupied land. It details the ways Israel has seized or denied crucial resources, such as water, to Palestinians under occupation. It documents a plethora of measures that confine Palestinians to fragmented enclaves and hinder their access to work, health and education facilities. These measures include the 700-kilometer barrier or wall, more than 500 checkpoints and blockades, and a complicated system of permits to heavily restrict movement.

"Palestinians living in the West Bank are blocked at every turn. This is not simply an inconvenience—it can be a matter of life or death. It is unacceptable that women in labor, sick children, or victims of accidents on their way to hospital should be forced to take long detours and face delays which can cost them their lives,” said Malcolm Smart, director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Program.

"International action is urgently needed to address the widespread human rights abuses being committed under the occupation, and which are fueling resentment and despair among a predominantly young and increasingly radicalized Palestinian population,” said Smart. “For 40 years, the international community has failed to adequately address the Israeli-Palestinian problem; it cannot, must not, wait another 40 years to do so.”

Of Gaza’s 1.4 million residents, a staggering 1.1 million now depend on outside food assistance. The World Food Program has identified Gaza as one of the world’s hunger global hot spots. The WFP is a principal food aid provider to Palestinians, providing assistance to 640,000 Palestinians, more than a third of them in Gaza.

The desperation—with young men unable to find work, travel outside the Gaza Strip or West Bank and forced to sleep 10 to a room in concrete hovels without running water—has empowered the Islamic radicals. The desperation has led the Palestinian population, once one of the most secular in the Middle East, to turn to radical fundamentalism. The more pressure and violence Israel employs, the more these radicals are empowered.

The Israeli lobby in the United States is captive to the far right of Israeli politics. It exerts influence not on behalf of the Jewish state but an ideological strain within Israel that believes it can crush Palestinian aspirations through force. The self-defeating policies of the Bush administration are mirrored in the self-defeating policies championed by the hard-right administration of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Jerusalem. Israel flouts international law and dismisses Security Council resolutions to respect the integrity of Palestinian territory. It has instead trapped Palestinians in squalid, barricaded ghettos where they barely survive.

It is not in Israel’s interest—or our own—to continue to fuel increased Palestinian strife and rising militancy. Economic sanctions and an arms ban against Israel are our last hope. These were the tools that toppled the apartheid regime in South Africa. And it was, after all, the sanctions imposed by the first President Bush—he suspended $10 billion of loan guarantees for resettling Russian immigrants in Israel—that prodded right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir to attend peace talks in Madrid.

A trade embargo—even if imposed only by European states—would be a start. It is outside pressure that can alone halt the inexorable slide into a conflict that could become regional. And a new regional conflict with Israel could spell the end of the Zionist experiment in the Middle East. It may be quixotic, perhaps even impossible, but it is the last measure left to save Israel from itself.

Chris Hedges is a veteran journalist and former Mideast bureau chief for The New York Times. His most recent book is “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War On America.”
Snuffysmith
Six days of war, 40 years of pain
Fatah militant leader Taysir Jamal (centre) is holed up in a stronghold in the Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza.
Photo: ED O'Loughlin


Latest related coverage
AdvertisementAdvertisement Ed O'Loughlin
June 2, 2007
Forty years ago, Israel captured land from Syria, Egypt and Jordan, but this did not translate into lasting peace. Many on both sides of the battle are now pondering the lost opportunities.

SOME say the war that broke out in the Middle East 40 years ago this week had changed the entire region when it ended six days later. Others say it never ended at all. Of all the territories captured by Israel in the Six-Day War, only the Sinai peninsula has been returned to its former owner, Egypt, thanks to former US president Jimmy Carter's Camp David accords.

On Israel's northern front, its troops and settlers still occupy the Golan Heights, seized from Syria on the fifth day of the war. Their conventional forces may no longer be engaged with each other but a state of phoney war still exists between Israel and Syria. Sometimes — such as last July, for instance — it erupts into proxy violence in neighbouring Lebanon.

In the West Bank and East Jerusalem, tens of thousands of Israeli soldiers and paramilitary police are needed to control 2.5 million Palestinians and to protect the 450,000 Jewish settlers planted in their midst since the war.

To the south, the isolated Palestinian enclave of Gaza remains, in the eyes of the United Nations, under Israeli military occupation despite the withdrawal of about 7500 Jewish settlers in 2005.

Gaza's air space, sea access and border crossings are still under tight Israeli military control, its economy subject to an Israeli embargo backed by Western powers.

In the past two weeks alone Gaza militant groups have fired about 270 home-made rockets into Israel, killing two civilians, while Israeli shells and air strikes have killed at least 40 Palestinians.

The Six-Day War might have appeared to be a decisive victory for Israel but its outcome was never transformed into a workable political peace. Within months of the war's end, hostilities had resumed with Egypt along the line of the Suez Canal.

The 1970s brought the Yom Kippur War, a new wave of international terror attacks by Palestinian resistance groups and the beginning of Israel's long and bloody entanglement in Lebanon. In 1987 the first Palestinian uprising broke out against Israeli military occupation, flaring again with redoubled violence on both sides in October 2000.

So looking back on the war and its 40-year aftermath people on both sides can find cause for regret. Akiva Eldar, an Israeli historian and commentator with the left-of-centre daily Ha'aretz, served in the war as a reservist with Israeli military intelligence. He is among those who think the Six-Day War is still going on.

"I think we are still in the seventh day of the war," he says. "We won the first six days of the war but we keep losing the seventh day, and it doesn't look like things are going to improve in the near future. For the first time since Israel's establishment we had a chance to win peace with the Arabs by trading the territories we took from Jordan and Syria and Egypt, but we fell in love with the bargaining chip. Moshe Dayan (then Israeli's defence minister) used to say we are just waiting for a telephone call from the Arabs to talk peace, but the Arabs tried to call us a few times since then and we refused to take the call."

David Wilder is at the other end of Israel's political spectrum. A native of New Jersey, he is one of several hundred Jews who live under heavy military protection in the first and most extreme of all the Jewish West Bank settlements, carved out of the historic heart of the Palestinian city of Hebron. He, too, believes that Israel made a crucial error after the Six-Day War, although not the one cited by Eldar.

"The mistake the people of Israel made is to refuse to recognise that Eretz Israel (the claimed biblical land of Israel) is an integral part of the Jewish people and that Hebron and Jerusalem are no less a part of Eretz Israel than Tel Aviv and Haifa," says Wilder.

"The Arabs have a mentality that respects strength and despises weakness, and Israel has been exuding weakness for the past 20 or 30 years in that Israel refuses to recognise the fact that this is our land by right, and that makes the Arabs continue their terrorism. The prime example is Gush Katif (the Gaza settlements abandoned by Israeli in 2005). We gave them Gush Katif and the result is they are shooting rockets at us."

Only a few metres from David Wilder's office in the Israeli-controlled section of Hebron is the home of Sheikh Ayoub al-Awayweh, the 65-year-old leader of a local Palestinian clan.

Earlier this month, two Israeli human rights groups reported that military curfews and attacks and harassment by settlers have driven out 40 per cent of the Palestinian households in the Israeli-controlled part of Hebron. Awayweh recalls with fondness the days when the kings of Jordan ruled there instead.

"Under the Israelis we feel there is no respect for any kind of people — women, men, leaders and kids — nobody. The Jordanians were better. There is no comparison. At least they are Arabs and they know how we feel and what we need."

Dr Mustafa Barghouti, an independent politician and founder of a medical charity, was recently appointed Information Minister for the Palestinian Authority, the shadow government for a state that does not exist. He was 12 years old when the Israelis captured his West Bank home town of Ramallah.

"First we had occupation and then limitation of movements and then gradually we saw the Israelis begin to confiscate our lands for their settlements," he recalls.

"Then they confiscated more lands for the security of the settlements, and then they confiscated more land for roads. They now have effectively confiscated more than half of the occupied territories, and we can't go from one part of what's left to another … I think the apartheid system we have here is much worse than the one they had in South Africa, because the victims are being blamed for it, not the ones who have the power."

On the other side of the ethnic divide, Yuval Steinitz, philosopher and Knesset member for the hardline Likud Party, has few regrets about the war or its aftermath. He believes they were the making of modern Israel.

"On the eve of the Six-Day War, Israel was a poor country with only 2 million Jews threatened by the standing armies of other countries, not just by terrorists," he says.

"We still have many troubles and we are facing terrorism and other threats but today it is a much stronger and wealthier country … Sinai is demilitarised. There is no Syrian artillery on the Golan Heights. Jerusalem isn't divided and there are no Jordanian snipers in East Jerusalem. Our relations with the US, Russia, China — all the major powers — are better than they used to be in the late 1960s and we have peace treaties with two important Arab countries, Jordan and Egypt." He is less sanguine, however, about relations with the Palestinians in the occupied territories.

"I don't see any way forward. I used to be a Peace Now activist in the 1980s, but I moved to the Likud because I understood with sorrow and regret that the goal of the Palestinians is not the establishment of a Palestinian state but the destruction of the Jewish state. For some people it's more important to destroy the other side than to build for themselves."

Taysir Jamal, 33, is even less cheerful about the future. A Fatah member and officer of the Palestine Authority's presidential guard, he says he is on a death list drawn up by the rival Hamas movement.

Two weeks ago, his fellow al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades commander, Baha Abu Jarad, 32, was gunned down in the street outside the north Gaza residence where both had taken refuge, one of dozens of victims of a simmering Hamas-Fatah feud.

<a name="contentSwap4"> This week Taysir Jamal seemed almost wistful as he showed off his prestigious Russian-made Kalashnikov and a bag of new factory-made rocket-propelled grenades.

"The situation has completely changed since the Six-Day War," he said.

"Now there is a Kalashnikov in every home, resistance groups everywhere, shooting all the time. Before 1967 if the Egyptians (then controlling Gaza) caught you with even one bullet you could be executed for it.

"Before 1967, all the Palestinians were united, but now you have secular groups, religious groups, centrists, extremists, Hamas, PFLP (Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine), Islamic Jihad, Fatah. There's chaos everywhere."

Yakov Attias is also nostalgic about a period he is too young to remember himself. Born in 1966 to Moroccan immigrant parents, he was raised the

hard way in the Jewish half of Jerusalem's Mosrara neighbourhood, divided by the 1948 armistice line. Today he runs a family car park on what is still marked on UN maps as "no man's land".

"Growing up I had a million Arab friends from the Old City but I wouldn't even walk there now," he says.

He thinks Israel wasted several chances to make peace with the Palestinians before the Islamic hardline Hamas movement won Palestinian Authority elections last year. Now he thinks it's too late. And Israel might be richer on paper, he says, but it has become a less pleasant, less egalitarian and more divided country.

"For me it's sad. Fifteen or 20 years ago we were one of the best countries in the world to live in but now it's not so good. The settlers took all the young soldiers to guard their houses and they got all the money from the state for their settlements. After the murder of (prime minister Yitzhak) Rabin it turned people in Israel against each other."

A hundred kilometres and a universe away from Jerusalem, 45-year-old social worker Mona Hamed was out shopping in Gaza City on Wednesday to feed her husband and eight children. Like many Palestinian state employees she has gone for months with little or no pay as a result of the international boycott of the Hamas-led Government.

"Things are much worse than they were before 1967. I don't mean those days were good, but now it's worse. Then there were still rules for war, but now the Israelis will bomb anything. Then there was no internal conflict but now there is a civil war. People don't like each other like they used to.

"They are always angry with each other and because the world is boycotting us the financial situation is very bad. It's like our lives have come to a halt."

Ed O'Loughlin is Jerusalem correspondent.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.