In the words of Douglas Neidermeyer, "Your all worthless and weak!"

You folks are not challenging my arguments as much as I expected. I don't know if you agree with most of them or just are incapable of proving why you disagree with most of them.

Here's the record so far:

DAA#1 Defeated
DAA#2 Alive
DAA#3 Defeated
DAA#4 Unchallenged and Archived (feel free to challenge it in a new thread)
DAA#5 Unaddressed
DAA#6 Alive

Here's the next one:

A monarchy is better than the alternatives.

All other forms of government are easy to hijack because they have no official human head. They are run by either private hidden agendas or bureaucracy which amounts to an evolving artificial intelligence, usally money in either case. Capitalism even has the gall to put money at the helm. So given the choice between money and a human being the dictator, at least a human being is capable of having morals other than more money.

Let's hear your petty weak arguments. Any takers? BWUHUHUHAHAHA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!

A somewhat counter argument might be that one common sense, common ground between
Conservatives and Liberals is the sanctity of Contracts. Conservatives need a system of Contracts and Enforcement to protect their major value of private propertity. Liberals need a system of
enforcable Contracts to legitimatize the Authority of the Constitution and Bill of Rights which rests all
Governmental Power in the hands of the governed (an aggregate of individual Persons)...

I agree that contracts are an alternative. I also agree that it is "a somewhat counter argument", as contracts may contain hidden agendas and loopholes. I have yet to see the perfect contract of government.

Please show me a Monarchy that didn't have, "hidden agendas"? Starting upward and outward
from the individual Person, expanding Awareness of One's Own, "Hidden Agendas," allows One
to more adaptatively perceive & conceive, "Hidden Agendas" in the social system...blaming
money is too much like blamming the Devil...

My argument does not defend monarchies of the past. Every monarchy probably has had hidden agendas. However, there is no need for hidden agendas if everyone were united. It is easier to unite everyone under one human vision than it is to unite everyone under multiple human visions or no human vision.

1 Vision = At least a chance at being a united one.
2+ Visions = Less of a chance at being a united one.
0 Visions = Even less of a chance at being a united one.

...more adaptively than what?

For every person adapting, there is another person counter-adapting.

Not exactly. The existence of the devil has never been proven.

The existence of money is undisputed. Although extent of money's influence is disputable, nobody denies that money is influential.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$_____$$$$$$____$$$_$$$_$$_$$$$$_____$$$$
$$$$_____$$$$$$____$$$_$$$_$$_$$$$$_____$$$$
$$$$$$_$$$$$$$$_$$$_$$_$$$_$$_$$$$$_$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$_$$$$$$$$_$$$_$$_$$$_$$_$$$$$_$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$_$$$$$$$$____$$$_$$$_$$_$$$$$_____$$$$
$$$$$$_$$$$$$$$____$$$_$$$_$$_$$$$$_____$$$$
$$$$$$_$$$$$$$$_$_$$$$_$$$_$$_$$$$$_$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$_$$$$$$$$_$_$$$$_$$$_$$_$$$$$_$$$$$$$$
$$$$_____$$$$$$_$$__$$$___$$$____$$_____$$$$
$$$$_____$$$$$$_$$__$$$___$$$____$$_____$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$