Things just got very interesting in Ohio.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Things just got very interesting in Ohio.
« on: Today at 10:40:11pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/3/04
rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/c04/c04_wj120204_arnebeck.rm WATCH THE VIDEO FROM C-SPAN ABOUT THE RECOUNT IN OHIO!!!!!!
Things just got very interesting in Ohio.
While the Kerry campaign is certainly keeping an eye on the situation in Ohio, it seems some laywers are getting some real results. A great Daily Kos diary (note this page now takes quote a while to load, so I have put most of the information here) alerted me to an interview on C-Span today where my new hero, Cliff Arnebeck (bio), an attorney for Alliance for Democracy, who is going to file a suit sometime between Friday and Monday. They only have until Monday to recount and finish this up because, under federal law, December 13 is when the members of the Electoral College cast their votes.
This might be why why Blackwell keeps delaying the certification of Ohio's vote. Mr Blackwell is playing a dual role as Ohio’s Secretary of State (and thus its chief electoral official) and as Co-Chairman of the Bush-Cheney reelection campaign there. As the Rev. Al Sharpton puts it "We need to investigate, coordinate, litigate, recount and recuse," he said, referring to the legitimacy of the Ohio vote. "Mr. Blackwell cannot be both the owner of the team and the umpire." Blackwell has gotten some unwanted attention on this issue. Just recently Conyers and other House Judiciary Democrats asked Blackwell to explain alleged Ohio election Irregularities. (PDF) This document is a MUST READ for anyone interested in preserving Democracy. Pa** it on to everyone you know. They are asking him to explain the following:
Why did Warren County officials exclude members of the press from observing vote counting on election night, claiming an FBI agent had warned of a terrorist threat that was a "10" on a scale of one to ten, but the FBI has no knowledge of such a warning?
Why did precincts in Perry County apparently record more votes than voters?
Why did Butler County and a number of other counties record more votes for an underfunded Democratic candidate for State Supreme Court than were recorded for the Democratic Presidential candidate?
Why did historically Democratic precincts in Cleveland record up to twenty-two times more votes for the Constitution Party Presidential candidate than all third-party candidates combined received in the 2000 election?
Why did voters in Mahong County report that when they attempted to record a vote for John Kerry their vote was displayed as being cast for George W. Bush?
Why did there appear to be a shortage of voting machines in traditionally Democratic precincts on election day, causing up to ten hour delays for voters, while there was an apparent surplus of voting machines in traditionally Republican precincts?
But I digress. Back to Mr. Arnebeck....
What Arnebeck is doing here is important. He is not demanding a recount. He is saying that he HAS EVIDENCE that the election result in Ohio is wrong. Let that sink in. Evidence of fraud that could overturn the election results. This is big. Mr. Arnebeck claims that he has proof that the Ohio election result is actually the opposite of what has been reported. His proof will show that Kerry won 51% of the vote in Ohio.
Listen for yourself. Go to http://www.cspan.org/ under "Recent Programs" and click on "Washington Journal Entire Program (12/02/04)", if you cant find it there try this:
Open Real Player, go to open location, and put in this URL:
rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/c04/c04_wj120204_arnebeck.rm
Now I just tried it and the servers over there are being hit hard so here is the relevant bit from a transcript:
"The only logical explanation is that there was a movement of some 65,000 votes or so that were cast for Kerry into the Bush column. Which created a margin that is approximately the total margin by which Bush was reported to have won Ohio. So our current view of the evidence is that this is where the fix occurred.
There were a variety of other problems in the election. There was the suppression of black voters in Franklin Co. by shorting machines in black and high Democratic performance districts. There was what we would call a precinct shuffle in Summit Co. and Cuyahuga Co. where a deliberate confusion was created about where people could vote. They cast their provisional ballots...there were election officials were telling them that they could vote in any precinct of the county and it would be counted. And then you've got Blackwell saying they won't be counted.
Our present feeling is that this is, while a serious conspiracy to violate the civil rights of a protected cla** of voters namely those of the black race, that this is not where the real fix occurred. This is something we will discuss in the lawsuit, but we intend to focus very, to hone in very aggressively in full tilt litigation with full discovery on what we believe is the fraud that occurred in the southern part of the state with the shift of votes.
Look at the two races. In effect the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court race is a benchmark race for the presidential race because both of these races were competitive, they were running neck and neck. All right so this gives you a basis to say "all right what happened in this situation and how does it relate to the other, the benchmark." Now a more ingenious approach might have been if you're going to do this you should have made the adjustment also in the Supreme Court race too, so this wouldn't stand out. This stands out like a sore thumb.
I think what happened is, all this civil rights violation was a red herring intended to stimulate the public interest groups and civil rights organizations to hone in on this, on this horrendous, horrendous attack on the rights of black voters. They thought that's what we would go after, the clock would run out, we wouldn't be able to prove our case. The real fraud occurred in this switching of votes in southern Ohio. That's our present view of the evidence."
The old bait and switch. Smells like Rove to me.Please forward this information LIBERALY!
