Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: NON PROLIFERATION and ARMS CONTROL
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > Foreign Policy and National Defense > Foreign Policy & National Defense Issues Archive
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Snuffysmith
Iran: Sanctions Forced Nuke-Program Secrecy
(Associated Press)
http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/40813.htm

Iran said yesterday it was forced to keep its nuclear program secret because of U.S. and European efforts to deny it access to the technology.

Despite the initial secrecy, Iran now openly admits that it has the technology for producing fuel for nuclear reactors or atomic bombs.
Snuffysmith
Cooperative Threat Reduction Beyond Russia
(Rose Gottemoeller, Washington Quarterly)
http://twq.com/05spring/docs/05spring_gottemoeller.pdf

Given the successes and political controversies that threat reduction cooperation with Russia has generated, how much of a role can these programs play in Iraq and Libya, India and Pakistan, or even eventually Iran or North Korea?
Snuffysmith
Push for Nuclear-Free Middle East Resurfaces
(Walter Pincus, Washington Post)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...8-2005Mar5.html

Sunday, March 6
Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and several Arab countries have said they plan to push discussion of creating a nuclear-free Middle East at the May conference of nations that have signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty. For Arab nations, it is a way of highlighting their complaint that Israel's possession of nuclear weapons has been a major factor behind any proliferation in the region, and that the United States employs a double standard in demanding no nuclear weapons programs from Iran and Arab states.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, in a report Thursday, called for the United States and other nuclear powers "to intensify efforts to create of a zone free of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons in the Middle East." Citing the conflicts and rivalries that abound in the region, the report says, "This knot of real and exaggerated security threats and status seeking is pulled tighter still by Israel's undeclared possession of nuclear weapons, and by its continuing conflict with the Palestinians and with neighboring Arab states that do not recognize its existence."

George Perkovich, one of the study's authors, said one starting point for the region could be to have Israel halt its production of fissile materials, the same thing that is being asked of Iran. "Our aim should be to create a security environment, and you can't do that if you don't recognize publicly that Israel has nuclear weapons," he said.
Snuffysmith
Critic of U.N. Named Envoy
(Glenn Kessler and Colum Lynch, Washington Post)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...0-2005Mar7.html

Tuesday, March 8
President Bush named Undersecretary of State John R. Bolton yesterday as the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, a surprise choice that would send an outspoken critic of the world body's effectiveness to its inner councils.

Bolton's government experience stretches through three Republican administrations, and his tough language and willingness to eschew diplomatic niceties have earned him both fans and critics overseas and in the bureaucracy. In Bush's first term, he proved to be highly effective at advancing his strong conservative views within the administration, even when he was at odds with then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell and much of the State Department.
Snuffysmith
Tough Love or Tough Luck?
(Susan E. Rice, Washington Post - Opinion)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...1-2005Mar7.html

President Bush has shocked even his most cynical critics by nominating the combative neoconservative John Bolton to one of our most complex and sensitive diplomatic posts: U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Bolton served the past four years as undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, though then-Secretary of State Colin Powell initially resisted his appointment.

Powell's successor, Condoleezza Rice, who passed over Bolton for deputy secretary despite strong support for him from Vice President Cheney, put on a brave face yesterday in announcing his appointment to the United Nations. She stressed the administration's commitment to U.N. reform and praised Bolton as a friend of the United Nations who helped repeal the noxious General Assembly resolution equating Zionism with racism. But as Rice must know, keeping Bolton off her team at State may prove a Pyrrhic victory, if he takes his notoriously abrasive style to New York.
Snuffysmith
Dyer: The Secret Behind Missile Defense Is That It's Not About Defense
(Salt Lake Tribune - Opinion)
http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_2598317

The latest tempest in a teapot in Canada has been Prime Minster Paul Martin's long-delayed decision not to take part in the U.S. project for ballistic missile defense (BMD).

Canada will share radar information about any incoming missile with the United States through the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), but it will not allow anti-missile interceptors on its soil (not that the U.S. wanted to put them there anyway), nor will it have any part in decisions to launch those weapons.

That should have kept everybody happy. The U.S. gets the information it wants, while Canada withholds its formal approval of a weapons initiative that a majority of Canadians (and of Martin's own Liberal Party caucus) think is dangerous and wrong.
Snuffysmith
Links of Interest:

New Website on Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty
http://www.NPT2005.org

The Arms Control Association (ACA) and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace launched a new Web site on the May 2005 Review Conference of the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). The website, NPT2005.org, provides valuable analysis of central issues and questions relating to the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and offers useful background information and resources for media, policymakers, diplomats, educators, and the general public.
Snuffysmith
Carnegie News:
On March 5-6, 2005, Carnegie Vice President for Studies George Perkovich and Director for Non-Proliferation Joseph Cirincione attended a conference in Tehran, Iran on “Nuclear Technology and Sustainable Development" at the Center for Strategic Research (CSR) of the Expediency Council, co-sponsored by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, and Ministry of Science, Research and Technology.

Joseph Cirincione toured the uranium conversion facility in Isfahan, Iran on Monday, March 7. It was the first time foreigners other than IAEA inspectors were given access to the facility.
Snuffysmith
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/7119928/

Iranian confirms underground nuke plant
Snuffysmith
http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_2598317

Dyer: The secret behind missile defense is that it's not about defense
Snuffysmith
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts03082005.html

Bush's Syrian Delusion
Paul Craig Roberts
theroyprocess
35th Anniversary of he NPT Treaty. The World Still Faces Annihilation

This past Saturday, March 5, 2005 marked the
35th anniversary of the NPT Treaty going into
effect, including, of course, it's Article VI
calling for the abolition of nuclear weapons. 35
years is a very, very long period of time. Many
reading this weren't even born then or were small
children. Lastly, Russia's inability to monitor
incoming "stuff" renders the possibility of an
accidental nuclear war MUCH more likely as we
drift towards unparalled catastrophes:

Article VI
Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to
pursue negotiations in good faith on effective
measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms
race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament.
and on a treaty on general and complete
disarmament under strict and effective
international control.


NPT Treaty:
http://www.cornnet.nl/~akmalten/docs.html

=============

"I have no hope of clearing my conscience.
The things we are working on are so terrible
that no amount of protesting or fiddling
with politics will save our souls."

Edward Teller
July 1945
===============

I am become Death, the shatterer of world's."
The line of Hindu scripture that flashed through Oppenheimer's mind
at the moment "gadget", the first test bomb exploded above the
New Mexico desert on July 16, 1945.

Bhagavad-Gita 11:32. Lord Krishna said: I am terrible time the destroyer
of all beings in all worlds, engaged to destroy all beings in this world, of these
heroic soldiers presently situated in the opposing army,
even without you none will be spared.
===============

A large part of History is replete with the struggle for human rights.
An eternal struggle in which a final victory can never be won.
But to tire in that struggle would mean the ruin of society.
-- Albert Einstein
(About one year before his death)
==============

Big Anti-Nuke Rally in New York Central Park

02 Dec 2004 21:46:46 GMT
U.S. National - Reuters
By Nicole Maestri

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N02426349.htm

NEW YORK (Reuters) - With tensions rising over nuclear
programs in Iran and North Korea, peace activists on
Thursday said they are planning a rally of 60,000
people next year to call for the abolition of nuclear weapons.

Organizers from United for Peace and Justice and Abolition
Now said they want to stage the demonstration in New York's
Central Park on May 1, before a United Nations
meeting to review the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The rally also comes ahead of the 60th anniversary of the
atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan by the
United States, which ended World War 2 in Asia.

The anti-nuclear weapons groups are working with the Mayors
for Peace to get representatives from around the world,
including the mayors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to come to
the rally and the treaty review conference.

"Survivors (of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) are growing
increasingly concerned, watching developments around the
world, that nuclear weapons will again be used and that
nobody who will actually remember hell on earth will be
alive," said Jackie Cabasso, U.S. coordinator for Abolition Now.

United for Peace and Justice is applying with New York
City's parks department to hold the rally at Central Park's
Great Lawn -- the same location the coalition was denied
access to this summer ahead of the Republican National
Convention.

Instead, it held a rally in the streets that it estimated
drew a crowd of 400,000. The police declined to estimate the
size of the crowd, but it stretched out more than a mile
along two main avenues in central Manhattan.

Leslie Cagan, national coordinator for United for Peace and
Justice, said at a news conference she was "optimistic" they
would get permission to use the park this time.

"People's voices will be heard on May 1," Cagan said. "That
is a critical moment for people in this city and this
country to speak out for complete and total nuclear
disarmament."

The non-proliferation treaty's objective is to prevent the
spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology. The
treaty, which went into force in 1970, is reviewed every
five years.

Carah Ong

Communications Director
Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
PMB 121, 1187 Coast Village Road, Suite 1
Santa Barbara, California 93108-2794
Tel: (805) 965-3443 Fax: (805) 568-0466

http://www.wagingpeace.org
http://www.nuclearfiles.org

* See also: NucNews Links and Archives (by date) at http://nucnews.net * (Posted for educational and research purposes only, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107) *
Snuffysmith
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/E58...CF5208737C4.htm

Pakistan: Khan supplied Iran centrifuges
Snuffysmith
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/2d179256-90da-11d...000e2511c8.html

Nuclear Arms to lead Rice's Asian Tour
Snuffysmith
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2005Mar10.html

Rogue Pakistani Scientist Gave Iran Nuclear Centrifuges
Snuffysmith
http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2005_03/Cortright.asp

Bombs, Carrots, and Sticks: The Use of Incentives and Sanctions
David Cortright and George Lopez
Snuffysmith
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/f7a6a0fe-9006-11d...000e2511c8.html

An Offer that Iran cannot refuse
Brent Scowcroft and Daniel Poneman
Snuffysmith
http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_2603180

Depot zaps millionth munition
Chemical weapons: The facility edges closer to eliminating its stock of blister and nerve agents.
Snuffysmith
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/a..._iran_nuclear_6

Pakistan Admits Rogue Scientist Aided Iran
Snuffysmith
Sam Nunn: US not example for nuclear non-proliferation:

"It's awfully hard to ask countries around the globe to do a lot more to fight against the North Koreans or the Iranians getting nuclear weapons if we ourselves seem to be increasing our dependence on nuclear weapons," Nunn said.
http://tinyurl.com/4goyu
Snuffysmith
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GC12Ak02.html

Hunting Deadly Treasure in Iraq
Snuffysmith
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GC12Ak03.html

Pride, science, fear yield WMD
Snuffysmith
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/13/internat...059&partner=AOL

Looting at Iraqi Weapons Plants Was Systematic, Official Says
Snuffysmith
SPACE STATION TANGLED UP IN IRAN NONPROLIFERATION ACT

The Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000, intended in part to curb the
transfer of sensitive technologies from Russia to Iran, is now
poised to jeopardize U.S.-Russian cooperation on the International
Space Station.

The 2000 statute has the "potential to stop the space-station program
dead in its tracks," said David Goldston of the House Science
Committee in an interview with the Economist, which reported the
story in its March 12 issue.

A new report from the Congressional Research Service provides
background on the Act and its largely unintended impact on the
International Space Station.

See "The Iran Nonproliferation Act and the International Space
Station: Issues and Options," March 2, here:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/space/RS22072.pdf
Snuffysmith
ENERGY DEPT MAY RELEASE PORTIONS OF URANIUM HISTORY

After a decade of equivocation, the Department of Energy may soon
release portions of its long-promised history of highly enriched
uranium production from 1945 to 1996.

In January of this year, DOE once again categorically denied a
Freedom of Information Act request for the document, which was
originally supposed to be published in 1997 (SN, 02/01/05).

But upon appeal from the Federation of American Scientists, DOE
officials last week said the blanket denial could not be sustained,
and that while some portions of the document were exempt from
disclosure, others were not.

So, for example, "information revealing the location and quantity of
fissile material can be properly withheld" for security reasons.

However, the report also "contains a great deal of purely factual
information, such as facts, figures, photographs and historical
narrative...A significant amount of the withheld factual information
contained in the Report could be released without revealing the
location or quantities of fissile materials."

Accordingly, the DOE Office of Security was advised that it "cannot
continue to withhold this information under the cited reasoning" and
must either release all such factual information or else provide a
new rationale for withholding it.

The March 7 ruling of the DOE Office of Hearings and Appeals is
available here:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2005/03/doe-heu-appeal.pdf

A previously published companion report on the history of plutonium
production, entitled "Plutonium: The First 50 Years," is here:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/pu50y.html
Snuffysmith
Pakistan Reviving Nuclear Black Market, Experts Say
(Louis Charbonneau, Reuters)
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L1468909.htm

Pakistan has developed new illicit channels to upgrade its nuclear weapons programme, despite efforts by the U.N. atomic watchdog to shut down all illegal procurement avenues, diplomats and nuclear experts said.

Western diplomats familiar with an investigation of the nuclear black market by the U.N.'s Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said this news was disturbing.

While Pakistan appeared to be shopping for its own needs, the existence of some nuclear black market channels meant there were still ways for rogue states or terrorist groups to acquire technology that could be used in atomic weapons, they said.
Snuffysmith
Bush Seeks to Ban Some Nations From All Nuclear Technology
(David E. Sanger, New York Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/15/politics/15treaty.html

Behind President Bush's recent shift in dealing with Iran's nuclear program lies a less visible goal: to rewrite, in effect, the main treaty governing the spread of nuclear technology, without actually renegotiating it.

In their public statements and background briefings in recent days, Mr. Bush's aides have acknowledged that Iran appears to have the right - on paper, at least - to enrich uranium to produce electric power. But Mr. Bush has managed to convince his reluctant European allies that the only acceptable outcome of their negotiations with Iran is that it must give up that right.

In what amounts to a reinterpretation of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Mr. Bush now argues that there is a new class of nations that simply cannot be trusted with the technology to produce nuclear material even if the treaty itself makes no such distinction.
Snuffysmith
Iran Rebuffs US Over Nuclear Plans
(Scott Peterson, Christian Science Monitor)
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0314/p01s03-wome.html

Iran's rejection of new US incentives to urge the Islamic republic to halt its nuclear ambitions could not have been on more prominent display. The US offer - to drop objections to Iran's entry into the World Trade Organization and permit it to purchase spare aircraft parts if it freezes its nuclear program - marks the first significant policy change toward Iran since President Bush labeled it part of an "axis of evil" in January 2002. But Iran dismisses the offer as "insignificant" and says the price will be much higher to get it to give up nuclear technology that it legally has a right to pursue under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

" The question is: How much of that [Iran rejection] is negotiating in the bazaar, and how much of that is true?" asks Joseph Cirincione, head of the nonproliferation program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, who returned last week from a nuclear conference in Tehran that included a visit to an Iranian conversion facility at Isfahan.

He says that, while there needs to be give and take on both sides, "That is exactly what many in the administration don't want to do - for some, the whole point is to overthrow the regime," he says. "So you really have a problem: The radicals in Tehran and Washington have the ability to torpedo any negotiations, by insisting on the right to enrich uranium on one hand, and insisting on the right to overthrow the government on the other."
Snuffysmith
U.S., E.U. Pressure Iran on Nuclear Ambitions
(NPR's Radio Talkshow "Day to Day")
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4531204

The United States and the European Union have launched a coordinated effort to pressure Iran to give up its nuclear program. Iran insists it is developing nuclear power for energy purposes only, but many nations fear Iran is working to build nuclear weapons. NPR's Madeleine Brand discusses the latest developments in that effort with Joseph Cirincione of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Snuffysmith
Looting at Weapons Plants was Systematic, Iraqi Says
(James Glantz and William J. Broad, New York Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/13/internat...ast/13loot.html?

In the weeks after Baghdad fell in April 2003, looters systematically dismantled and removed tons of machinery from Saddam Hussein's most important weapons installations, including some with high-precision equipment capable of making parts for nuclear arms, a senior Iraqi official said this week in the government's first extensive comments on the looting.

The Iraqi official, Sami al-Araji, the deputy minister of industry, said it appeared that a highly organized operation had pinpointed specific plants in search of valuable equipment, some of which could be used for both military and civilian applications, and carted the machinery away.

Dr. Araji said his account was based largely on observations by government employees and officials who either worked at the sites or lived near them.
Snuffysmith
Iran and Israel's Nuclear Weapons
(Joseph Cirincione, Globalist)
http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=3217

For quite some time now, Washington officials have been pressuring the International Atomic Energy Agency to find Iran's nuclear power program in "material breach" of its treaty obligations not to develop nuclear weapons.

The tough talk against Tehran has inadvertently put on the table a program that no one in Washington wants to discuss openly — Israel's nuclear weapons program.

In fact, the world does well to remember that most Middle East weapons programs began as a response to Israel's development of nuclear weapons. That program started in the early 1950s — and had secretly yielded a bomb by 1968.
Snuffysmith
US is Urged to Back 2 Nuclear Treaties
(Bryan Bender, Boston Globe)
http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/...clear_treaties/

Diplomats representing more than a dozen countries have urged the United States to embrace a set of proposed treaties to stem the spread of nuclear arms. They accuse Washington of backing away from a collective approach to arms control and helping to erode a three-decade framework for controlling nuclear weapons.

Meeting in the Norwegian capital over two days earlier this month, the diplomats and European, African, and Asian nuclear specialists blamed the United States' refusal to support two major treaties -- which would halt production of weapons-grade material and stop all nuclear testing -- for providing greater incentive for other nations with nuclear ambitions to cling to their weapons programs.

In the process, they said, Washington may be reinforcing Iran's and North Korea's sense that nuclear arsenals are critical to their security.
Snuffysmith
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/03/15/news/nukes.html

News Analysis: Bush seeks to change worldwide nuclear pact
Snuffysmith
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/82b0deea-9529-11d...000e2511c8.html

N. Korea may 'boost nuclear arsenal' to deter US
Snuffysmith
Bush seeks to alter global nuclear pact:

Bush's aides have acknowledged that Iran appears to have the right - on paper, at least - to enrich uranium to produce electric power. But Bush has managed to convince his reluctant European allies that the only acceptable outcome of their negotiations with Iran is that it give up that right.
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file...news/nukes.html

http://tinyurl.com/656hp
Snuffysmith
Forward Observer: Penetrating Debate
By George C. Wilson, CongressDaily

President Bush's new request for money to study building a nuclear weapon that could penetrate the earth to kill enemy commanders in their bunkers deep underground is already politically radioactive within four congressional committees and will soon mushroom into a wider debate.

Bush and company contend the nukes should at least be looked at as a way of destroying enemy command posts and ammunition storage dumps buried so deep that nothing now in the arsenal can reach them. Opponents counter that pursuit of a nuclear bunker buster, even without a commitment to build one, would give other nations an excuse to leap over the firebreak separating conventional and nuclear weapons—a leap that would endanger everyone on the planet, given the administration's recent admission that any nuke exploding underground would hurl deadly radioactive fallout into the air above.

Congress, during last-minute wheeling and dealing last year, struck out the study money Bush wanted for the nuclear bunker buster, formally called RNEP for Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator. Bush gained political strength in Congress in the last election, but he has lost some significant debating points because his own expert on the bunker buster has just acknowledged there is no way to keep its fallout sealed inside the earth.

Full story: http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0305/031405fo.htm
Snuffysmith
No Incentives Enough for Iran to Halt Nuclear Program: Khatami
(Agence France-Presse)
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?p...7-3-2005_pg7_47

Iran’s President Mohammad Khatami asserted on Wednesday that no incentives would be enough to convince the Islamic republic to renounce its nuclear programme, but pledged the country would make “every effort” to convince the world it was not seeking atomic weapons.

“We will not give up our nuclear technology in return for any incentives. We will not accept any incentives. And we will make every effort to convince the world that what we have is peaceful,” Khatami told a news conference.

When asked to respond to US demands that Iran abandon its bid to master the fuel cycle and enrich uranium, Khatami replied, “Then I ask (US President George W) Bush to stop his incorrect policies against Iran and the Middle East."

“Part of the crisis in the Middle East comes form the US. If the US really wants to put a stop to atomic weapons, it should go to the countries that are not members of the NPT (nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) and who do not abide by international regulations. The most dangerous of them is Israel,” he added. “We are also worried about nuclear weapons."
Snuffysmith
Iran Offers Europe 'Guarantees' on Its Nuclear Program
(Jad Mouawad, New York Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/17/internat...ast/17nuke.html

President Mohammad Khatami said Wednesday that his country would not drop its uranium-enrichment program but was ready to provide "objective guarantees" that European negotiators were seeking about Iran's nuclear program.

Britain, France and Germany have been negotiating with Iran on behalf of the European Union to end Iran's enrichment program, which the United States suspects is secretly being used to develop nuclear weapons and Iran insists is being used for civilian energy purposes.
Snuffysmith
Rice Seeks Details on Pakistani's Nuclear Help to Iran
(Joel Brinkley and Steven R. Weisman, New York Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/16/internat...16pakistan.html

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice plans to press President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for more information on the help a rogue Pakistani scientist, A. Q. Khan, is believed to have given Iran to develop a nuclear weapons program, a senior administration official said Tuesday.

Speaking on the eve of talks that Ms. Rice plans to hold with Indian and Pakistani leaders on the first leg of her trip to Asia, the official said that Pakistan had been helpful in the past on sharing information from its own investigation of Dr. Khan, but that the administration wanted more.

" We have been getting good cooperation from the Pakistanis," the official said when asked about the investigation into Iran. "They have been pursuing this. Of course we always want more. We always discuss nonproliferation with the Pakistanis. I am sure we will discuss it this time. I am sure A. Q. Khan will come up."
Snuffysmith
In Asia, Rice Says North Korea More Isolated From Neighbors
(Glenn Kessler, Washington Post)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2005Mar15.html

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asserted Tuesday that North Korea's "isolation from its neighbors has deepened" as it has bolstered its nuclear stockpile in the past year, even as South Korea and China continue to maintain close economic links to the North.

Speaking to reporters as she traveled to India for the first leg of a week-long Asian tour, Rice also brushed aside North Korea's pronouncement Tuesday that it might increase its nuclear arsenal to maintain a balance of power in East Asia and help prevent a U.S. attack. Rice reiterated the administration's position that it had "no intention" of attacking or invading North Korea.

She said the Bush administration understood that South Korea needed to seek good relations with its neighbor, but she said "the relationship is not moving as rapidly as it once was" because the North continues to develop weapons.
Snuffysmith
U.S. Official Turns Up Rhetoric on North Korea
(Reuters)
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wo...headlines-world

Stalled six-country negotiations on North Korea's nuclear weapons program must be accelerated or other ways of dealing with the issue must be considered, the U.S. point man on the issue said Tuesday.

Although the China-hosted talks are the preferred format for resolving the issue, said Christopher Hill, U.S. ambassador to South Korea, "we need to see some progress here. If we don't, we need to look at other ways to deal with this."

Speaking at his U.S. Senate nomination hearing to be assistant secretary of State for Asian and Pacific affairs, Hill talked about urging Russia and "any country doing any business" with North Korea to reconsider activities it may be involved in that encourage Pyongyang's "bad behavior."
Snuffysmith
India, US hit snags over Iran, F-16s to Pak
(Times of India)
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1053675.cms

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's first visit to India as part of a shift towards closer ties hit a few snags on Wednesday over the proposed gas pipeline from Iran and the possible sale of F-16s to Pakistan.

Rice said Washington - seeking to apply international pressure over what it says is a secret Iranian programme to develop nuclear weapons - was concerned over plans for a USD 4 billion gas pipeline through Pakistan to India. India made it clear to Rice that it was going ahead with talks on the gas pipeline notwithstanding Washington's objections.

Before starting her tour, Rice has said ties between the United States and India, former Cold War foes, had never been better. But Singh said India also had good relations with historic trading partner Iran and would push ahead with talks on the gas pipeline. The proposal is at an early stage and is aimed at easing India's energy requirements.
theroyprocess
[Please spread the word far and wide, and help get your
representatives to sign on. This needs a Move-On type
promotion - please solicit help! et]

NORTON INTRODUCES BILL FOR TRANSFER OF WEAPON FUNDS TO
DOMESTIC NEEDS

Criticizes Bush for Decreasing Funding for Nuclear Threat
Reduction

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 16, 2005

http://www.norton.house.gov/issues2.cfm?id=10279

Washington, DC — Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)
reintroduced the Nuclear Disarmament and Economic Conversion
Act of 2005 (NDECA) today as Japan and the United States
mark the 60th anniversary of the devastation of Japanese
cities by an atomic bomb by the United States to end World
War II. NDECA would require the United States to disable
and dismantle its nuclear weapons when all other nations
possessing nuclear weapons enact laws to do the same.
NDECA further provides that when our nuclear weapons are
dismantled, the resources used to support nuclear weapons
programs would be diverted to our growing human and
infrastructure needs, such as housing, health care, Social
Security and the environment.
Norton has introduced this bill every year following a
ballot initiative in the District in 1993.

The Congresswoman said: “In addition to the economic cost of
nuclear weapons, the weapons have increased as a
destabilizing force in world affairs.” Norton, a member of
the Homeland Security Committee, said that the threat was
greatest today from inadequately defended nuclear materials
throughout the world. She criticized the Bush
administration for reducing nuclear threat spending since
9/11. Norton said that with 45 million people still without
health care, Social Security without the benefits for the
huge baby boomer generation, an economy burdened with a
dangerous deficit, and millions of Americans pushed back
into poverty, the time has come to begin transferring
funding for nuclear weapons to urgent domestic needs.

Norton’s full introductory statement follows:

Mr. Speaker, today, I am again introducing the Nuclear
Disarmament and Economic Conversion Act (NDECA), as I have
done since 1994. I have introduced this bill every year
based on a ballot initiative passed by D.C. residents in
1993. NDECA will require the United States to disable and
dismantle its nuclear weapons when all other nations
possessing nuclear weapons enact laws to do the same. NDECA
further provides that when U.S. nuclear weapons are
dismantled, the resources used to support nuclear weapon
programs would be diverted to our growing human and
infrastructure needs, such as housing, health care, Social
Security and the environment.

This year’s introduction of this bill has special meaning
because this is the sixtieth anniversary of the U.S. bombing
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Only the United States has used
an atom bomb, but today the number of nations with this
capability has grown dangerously and continues without
effective intervention by the Bush administration.

In addition to the economic cost of nuclear weapons, the
weapons have increased as a destabilizing force in world
affairs. North Korea, at least in part in response to
stepped up aggressive talk and U.S. policies, has responded
in a dangerously paranoid fashion by announcing that it is
expanding its nuclear capabilities and even that it now has
a nuclear weapon, although these claims have not been
entirely verified. Iran also appears to be pursuing greater
nuclear capability and is resisting inspections. India and
Pakistan have moved back from the precipice of several years
ago but each remains poised with nuclear weapons.

This country must lead the world community in redoubling
efforts to push back the new surge of nuclear proliferation.
Our country would be better able to dissuade other nations
who aspire to become or remain nuclear powers if we
ourselves took greater initiative in dismantling our own
nuclear weapons program. We moved in the right direction
when the Senate ratified the Moscow Treaty in 2003, which
provides that by 2012 both the United States and Russia will
reduce their long-range warheads two-thirds from
approximately 6,000 warheads each to 2,200. However, the
Administration has failed to build on this effort.
According to a recent study, “Securing The Bomb: An Agenda
for Action” (May, 2004; prepared by the Belfer Center,
Harvard University Kennedy School of Government): “Total
nuclear-threat-reduction spending remains less than one
quarter of one percent of the U.S. military budget. Indeed,
on average, the Bush administration requests for
nuclear-threat-reduction spending over FY 2002 – 2005 have
been less, in real terms, than the last Clinton
administration request, made long before the 9/11 attacks
ever occurred.”

However, the problem today is far more complicated than
nuclear disarmament by nation states. The greatest threat
today is from inadequately defended and guarded sites in
many countries where there is enough material to make
nuclear weapons and many opportunities for terrorists to
secure nuclear materials. Astonishingly, because of the
absence of presidential leadership, less nuclear material
was seized in the two years following the 9/11 attacks than
in the two years immediately preceding the attacks
(“Securing The Bomb: An Agenda for Action”, May 2004).

I serve on the Prevention of Nuclear and Biological Attack
Subcommittee of the Homeland Security Committee. I know that
threats from nuclear proliferation and available nuclear
material are more dangerous in the post 9/11 era than at any
time since I first introduced this bill in 1994. The way to
begin is closing down nuclear capability here and around the
world.

With 45 million people still without health insurance,
Social Security without the benefits for the huge baby
boomer generation, an economy burdened with a dangerous
deficit, and millions of Americans pushed back into poverty
during the last four years, the time has come to begin the
transfer of nuclear weapons funds to urgent domestic needs.

Proposition One Committee
P.O. Box 27217, Washington, DC 20038 USA
202-682-4282 (phone and fax)
prop1@prop1.org | http://prop1.org

~ Peace Through Reason - Convert the War Machines! ~

* See also: NucNews Links and Archives (by date) at http://nucnews.net *
(Posted for educational and research purposes only,
in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107) *
Snuffysmith
http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_serv...service_id=7387

Iran takes defense measures fearing possible attacks
Snuffysmith
China, Iran Missile Sales Confirmed
--------------------

Ukraine official blames criminals and says ex-President Kuchma's government wasn't involved in shipments of Soviet-era weapons.

By David Holley
Times Staff Writer

March 19 2005

MOSCOW; Smugglers in Ukraine shipped 18 cruise missiles, each capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, to Iran and China at the beginning of the decade, Ukrainian prosecutors said Friday.

The complete article can be viewed at:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wo...0,6666610.story
Snuffysmith
U.S. Misled Allies About Nuclear Export

By Dafna Linzer

In an effort to increase pressure on North Korea, the Bush administration told its Asian allies in briefings earlier this year that Pyongyang had exported nuclear material to Libya. That was a significant new charge, the first allegation that North Korea was helping to create a new nuclear weapons state.

To view the entire article, go to http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...er=emailarticle
Snuffysmith
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2005Mar17.html

Destroyer of Worlds
The Bomb: A Life
Snuffysmith
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2005Mar17.html

Arms and the Man
Ronald Reagan and His Quest to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
Snuffysmith
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2005Mar17.html

In Brief: Giggling at the Apocalypse
Snuffysmith
http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/Focus/GC22Dh01.html

Nuclear gambit backfires
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.