Greetings from RGE Monitor!
After Congress surprisingly rejected the $700bn bail-out of Wall Street by Main Street, the U.S.
stock markets tanked the most since Black Monday in 1987. See:
U.S.Congress Battles with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Legislation The rejected draft bill included a general but unspecified provision that the financial industry would pay for any outstanding cost for the program after 5 years. The m
ain components include: 1) $700bn released in installments: $250bn right away, $100bn later if results were to be positive, with an option to block the remaining $350bn;
2) equity warrants in return for bad asset purchase to recapitalize institutions and retain upside for taxpayers;
3) ability for the government to buy troubled assets from pension plans, local governments, small banks;
4) selective restrictions on
executive compensation;
5) independent oversight board;
6) the government’s ability as the owner of mortgages and MBSs to help more struggling homeowners to modify the terms of their home loans. However,
Democrats jettisoned a reform of the Bankruptcy law to lower debt value of purchased mortgages. Separately, Democrats' call for a
second stimulus package was rejected by Republicans in the Senate.
Among the possible changes in the bill that will be put to the vote again are:
1) expanding the role of FDIC to inject capital into credit markets by assisting banks with troubled assets,
2) raising size of bank accounts insured by FDIC to $250,000 from $100,000 currently,
3) mandatory insurance program for MBSs,
4) suspension of mark-to-market accounting,
5) required assessment of
real value of troubled assets by bank regulators,
6) extension of unemployment insurance. Most economists agree that this package is not addressing the underlying problems and that there are
alternative, more efficient solutions. A reform of the Bankruptcy law – that Democrats have been pushing for – is not among the proposed changes.
Credit and money markets effectively seized up after the House failed to pass the bill. Unsecured overnight lending among banks virtually stopped, sending the USD LIBOR rate to over 6%, an all-time high. Note that LIBOR is the baseline for pricing the interest-rate instruments universe of over $350 trillion, including unsecured bonds, interest rate derivatives, and credit default swaps. If banks stop lending and hoard cash instead, any liquidity pumped into the system by central banks will not be used for new loans to feed real economic consumption and investment.
Non-financial corporations that seemed distant from the financial storm are already encountering more difficult funding conditions both in the commercial paper and in the corporate bond markets.
The flight to quality as measured by the TED spreads renders traditional funding conditions by former investment banks in the
repo markets equally expensive. Moreover, the model of borrowing short at a discount and lending or investing in long term esoteric and lightly traded complex derivatives no longer seems viable.
Goldman’s desire to create a deposit base by purchasing the assets of failed banks may very well be too little, too late. Buffett’s $5bn investment in GS, though substantial, seems only to buy it time to look for a bigger and stronger (probably foreign) partner. Mitsubishi Bank’s investment in
Morgan Stanley of $9bn, though substantial as well, seems to only provide a cushion of time – over the past week hedge funds have been voting with their feet by withdrawing one third from Morgan’s brokerage unit.
In his latest writing,
Nouriel Roubini states the reasons for why the U.S. and global financial crisis is becoming much more severe in spite of the Treasury rescue plan. The risk of a total systemic meltdown is now as high as ever since the credit crunch is gripping European banks as well. In the past four days, the governments of no less than
seven European countries were required to nationalize banks or guarantee the deposits of large cross-border banking institutions. The
exposure of European banks is threefold: first, as direct buyers of ABS based on U.S. originated assets; second, there is substantial credit enhancement for EU banks provided by AIG and U.S. based monolines; third, because of the bursting of domestic housing bubbles in UK, Ireland, Spain, France, emerging Europe with a 2-year lag with respect to the U.S.
Interbank rates in
Hong Kong and
Singapore also shot up this week, leading their monetary authorities to inject liquidity and expand the allowable collateral.
Australia and Japan continued to inject liquidity into the domestic markets – over $20bn yesterday alone.
The central banks of several oil exporters are trying to avoid a sharp contraction of credit growth, now that foreign roll-over credit is not available. The
Russian government has stepped in to provide another $50bn to its corporate and financial borrowers whose external financing is maturing and it is encouraging bank consolidation. So far, the UAE’s
new liquidity facility has done little to ease interbank rates, with Eibor above 4% ahead of the Eid Holiday, likely because the banks are unwilling to avail themselves of the conditions. And other GCC countries, led by Kuwait, are reportedly loaning directly to the banking sector.