Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Articles on DOD, News, Commentary
Common Ground Common Sense > Issues that Affect Our Lives > U.S. Military Issues
Pages: 1, 2, 3
Snuffysmith
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

24 Hours on the 'Big Stick' - Weekly Standard opinion
How to Support the Troops - Boston Globe editorial
The Long-Term Costs of War - Intel Dump
The Continued Disrespect of Our Armed Forces - Blackfive
Speedhawk Challenges Osprey - Danger Room

Snuffysmith
Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand - New York Times
How the Pentagon Spreads Its Message - New York Times video
Thanking Our GIs - Washington Post editorial
The Department of Defense’s New Plan for Academia - Savage Minds

Snuffysmith
Critics Turn Crosshairs on Military's Main Rifle - USA Today
TV Military Analysts Co-opted by Pentagon - Outside the Beltway
Smart IO Campaign or Out of Bounds? - Abu Muqawama
The Hidden Hand - MountainRunner
Message Force Multipliers - Kings of War

Snuffysmith
Gates Assails Pentagon on Resources - White and Branigin, Washington Post
Air Force Under Fire From Gates - Peter Spiegel, Los Angeles Times
Why the Air Force Bugs Gates - Mark Thompson, Time
Air Force Must do More for War, Gates Says - Associated Press
Military Waivers for Ex-Convicts Increase - Ann Scott Tyson, Washington Post
Propaganda at Home - Boston Globe editorial
Pentagon Payola - Ralph Peters, New York Post opinion
The Problem with Culture (Ours) - Abu Muqawama, Abu Muqawama
The Ghost of Boyd Invoked - John Robb, Global Guerrillas
Gates: Air Force Must Do More - Sharon Weinberger, Danger Room
Stop the Presses! - Max Boot, Contentions
What's Behind the Hidden Hand... - Matt Armstrong, MountainRunner
What The Times Was Up To - John Podhoretz, Contentions
The Military's Talking Heads - Sharon Weinberger, Danger Room
Smith-Mundt: A Symposium... - Matt Armstrong, MountainRunner
Army's M4 Carbine Controversy Rages - Dan Dupont, Danger Room

Snuffysmith
Air and Land Power in COIN Operations Conference Report - Harvard University
A New Focus on Nation-Building - Gordon Lubold, Christian Science Monitor
US Air Farce - New York Post editorial
Ex-worker at Arsenal Faces Spy Charges - Jerry Seper, Washington Times
Fallout From 5 Years at War - USA Today editorial
Shake-up in Roles and Missions Coming - Westhawk, Westhawk
Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency - Matt Armstrong, MountainRunner
One World - Richard Fernandez, The Belmont Club
Secretary Gates Has Been Busy - Charlie, Abu Muqawama
The Problem with Being Ex-military... - Tom Barnett, Thomas PM Barnett
Pundits or Puppets Cont. - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Campaign Stars for Afghan and Iraq Medals - James Joyner, Outside the Beltway

Snuffysmith
Dissent in the Army - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Navy Will Stand Up 4th Fleet - Galrahn, Information Dissemination
Pentagon Suspends Briefings for Analysts - David Barstow, New York Times
Peters on "Gates's Grand Slam" - Steve Schippert, NR The Tank
The Last of America's Army in Vietnam - Richard Fernandez, The Belmont Club

Snuffysmith
When it Comes Time to Kill - David Zucchino, Los Angeles Times
Allegations Lead Army to Review Arms Policy - C.J. Chivers, New York Times
The Petraeus Promotion - Jeffrey Bell, Weekly Standard opinion
Snuffysmith
US Hones Intelligence Skills - Sara Carter, Washington Times
Another Amphib For the Humanitarian Mission - Galrahn, Information Dissemination
Nominations Signal Faith in Strategy - Jeff Schogol, Stars and Stripes
Gates Labors in Push for UAVs - Gordon Lubold, Christian Science Monitor
One-Stop Defense Shopping - Zakheim and Kadish, Washington Post opinion
More on the Generals - Kip, Abu Muqawama

Snuffysmith
Some War Veterans Find GI Bill Falls Short - Susan Kinzie, Washington Post
The Next Generation of Army Officers - Ray Kimball, Huffington Post
Killer Drone Invades Museum - David Axe, Danger Room
Strange Case of the Army's Robot Thief - Noah Shachtman, Danger Room
Where Soldiers Have to Live - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
A Wavering Military - Baltimore Sun editorial
Snuffysmith
Repairs Underway in Barracks, Army Says - Ann Scott Tyson, Washington Post
When You Wish Upon a Star - Phillip Carter, Slate opinion
Wrong-headed Thinking from Another Age - Tom Barnett, Thomas PM Barnett

Snuffysmith
Silver Star, Removed From Combat - Ann Scott Tyson, Washington Post
All The News That’s… A Rebuttal - Jill Russell, Small Wars Journal
The Pentagon’s Message, and Ours - New York Times letter to the editor
Narrow the College Gap for Vets - Christian Science Monitor editorial
Flat Top Follies - Peter Brookes, New York Post
The Few, the Proud, the Bad - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Iraqisms, Artillery and COIN - Paul McLeary, War, Military, COIN and Stuff
Army Embraces Distance Learning - Charlie, OPFOR

Snuffysmith
Senate Panel Moves to Shift War Costs - Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post
Bob Gates on Dissent - Max Boot, Contentions
How to Build a Jet Fighter - Reuben Johnson, Weekly Standard opinion
Cannons to the Left, Cannons to the Right... - Richard Fernandez, The Belmont Club
Give Her a Medal, Then Go Stupid - Kat, Argghhh!
An Officer or a Football Player? - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
An Education for Veterans - Washington Times editorial

ACADEMIA

Why Don't Colleges Teach Military History? - Justin Ewers, US News & World Report
Academia’s Jihad Against Military History - Mark Safranski, ZenPundit
Why Study War? - Victor Davis Hanson, City Journal opinion

Snuffysmith
gt. Merlin German, 1985-2008 - New York Post editorial
Saluting Wounded Warriors - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
COIN Roundatable - Uncle Jimbo, Blackfirve
USS Independence, LCS 2, Launched! - Pinch, Blackfive US INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY

Spying Gets Older and Wiser - James Bamford, Sydney Morning Herald
Proactive Cyber-Security Role for Spy Agencies - Brian Krebs, Washington Post

Snuffysmith
Military Check-up Time - Michael O'Hanlon, Washington Times opinion
US Troop Deployments Now a Zero-sum Game - Westhawk, Westhawk

NATO

A Name to Reckon With - Metodija A. Koloski, Washington Times opinon

Snuffysmith
Pass It Clean. Pass It Now. - National Review editorial
Military Check-up Time - Michael O'Hanlon, Washington Times opinion
Indictment of Army's Competence - Joseph Galloway, Miami Herald opinion
US Troop Deployments Now a Zero-sum Game - Westhawk, Westhawk
Senate Armed Forces FY09 Markup Bill - Galrahn, Information Dissemination
Navy May Need a Plan B For USS Enterprise - Galrahn, Information Dissemination
The Infamous Question 21 - Washington Post editorial
Healing Unseen Wounds - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump

Snuffysmith
US DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Hundreds of Laptops Missing at State - James Joyner, Outside the Beltway

US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Doing the Troops Wrong - Bob Herbert, New York Times opinion
Dad Builds Armored Vehicle for Son's War - Nancy Youssef, Nukes and Spooks
Army Eyes 100 Mile-Per-Hour Battle-Buggies - Noah Shachtman, Danger Room

US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Scrapped Vessels Haunt Coast Guard - Jen Haberkorn, Washington Times

Snuffysmith

The Pentagon vs. the U.S.: How Americans Have Become Targets of Their Own Military

By Scott Ritter, Truthdig

America is a country at war with itself.
Snuffysmith
Junior Officer Retention - Jaron Wharton, Center for a New American Security
Captain Crunch - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Military Looks for HUMVEE Successor - Gordon Lubold, Christian Science Monitor
USS San Antonio Good To Go - Galrahn, Information Dissemination
Lock and Load: Duncan Hunters Navy - Galrahn, Information Dissemination
Rise of the Counterinsurgents - Spencer Ackerman, Washington Independent
Has a Svengali Mesmerized the Pentagon? - DB, The Chicago Blog
The Counterinsgency Debate on NPR - Kip and Charlie, Abu Muqawama
COIN vs. Big Army Debate on NPR - Mark Safranski, ZenPundit
Are We About to Finally Get the Advisor Corps? - Westhawk, Westhawk
Flagless Advisors - Kip, Abu Muqawama

Snuffysmith
US Deploys More than 43,000 Unfit for Combat - Gregg Zoroya, USA Today
Pentagon Pundit Project and the NYT - Noah Shachtman, Danger Room
DoD Outreach: Minerva Project Update - DoD Bloggers Roundtable
DoD Minerva Consortia - David Betz, Kings of War
Pentagon's Academic Outreach - Sharon Weinberger, Danger Room
ONR Phase II T-Craft Contracts Issued - Galrahn, Information Dissemination

Snuffysmith
DISPATCHES FROM AMERICA
The US: Your masters of the universe

The US Air Force's new slogan, "Air Force - Above All" conveys the basic precept that mastery of the air means mastery of the ground. Yet the air force seeks more than that. It wants to extend its "mastery" to space and even to cyberspace. This is a disturbing manifestation of the military's quest for "full spectrum dominance", achieved at debilitating cost to the American taxpayer - and a potentially destabilizing one to the planet. - William J Astore (retired lieutenant colonel, USAF) (May 8, '08)
Snuffysmith
Why More Money is Sinking America's Armed Forces
Drowning in Dollars
By WINSLOW T. WHEELER

It is now conventional wisdom to say that the Pentagon budget is higher in "real" dollars[1] than at any point since the end of World War II. The $635 billion appropriated in fiscal year 2007 is $31 billion, or 5 percent, above the previous high water mark, 1952 at $604 billion. 2008 will be higher still at about $670 billion, [2] and 2009 will likely be more again.

What is not conventional wisdom - but should be - is that at today's historic high level of spending, our military forces are smaller than they have ever been since the end of World War II; equipment is – on average – older than it ever has been before, and key elements of our most important fighting forces are not fully prepared for combat. Recently, the addition of substantial additional sums of money – separate from the additional funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan – have made things not better, but worse.

For the budget data, little if any analysis is required, they are all readily available in an annual DOD publication, known as the "Greenbook."[3] It consists of a couple hundred pages of Pentagon budget and related data going back as much as 60 years. With the aid of this volume, people in Washington "analyze" Pentagon budgets: often merely by transcribing the Pentagon's numbers onto a spreadsheet, if not directly into an article or commentary.

Important basic data not included in the Greenbook are the numbers that comprise the force structure of US Armed Forces. Here and there, one can find how many divisions were in the Army for a given year; how many aircraft are in the Air Force, how many ships in the Navy, the nuclear bombers in the so-called strategic forces, and so on. Sometimes the Congressional Research Service (CRS) will crank out the numbers in a year by year table for a specified – but relatively short – period of time. The Defense Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee has published numbers for each of the military services for several years, and one can find various numbers in the budget justification materials the Armed Forces send to Capitol Hill. However, no one publishes the data in a reliable manner in annual increments for the post-World War II period for the key military forces; what data that are available from then to now jump from one way of counting the "beans" to another. There is no apples-to-apples, comparable set of numbers that reliably show the changes over time.

For example, data for the Army sometimes addresses only divisions; sometimes the data include independent combat brigades or regiments; sometimes it is unclear whether the numbers do or do not include the Army Reserve and/or National Guard. For the Navy, some presidential administrations anxious to inflate the numbers (such as the Reagan Administration when John Lehman was Secretary of the Navy) have included logistics ships in the "battle fleet;" others did not. Some include ships in the Naval Reserve; some will include lesser patrol craft; some do not. The differences from one year's listing to another are rarely made clear.

The biggest mess in the data appears to be in the Air Force. The historical data that is publicly available sometimes addresses "Primary Aircraft Authorization" (PAA); sometimes it counts "Total Available Inventory" (TAI, a number that can be significantly different from the PAA count). Sometimes the data for the "tactical" Air Force conflates attack aircraft along with fighter aircraft, and sometimes it is not clear what is included. Phone calls and e-mails to the Air Force's historical offices at Bolling and Maxwell Air Force Bases only confirmed the confusion: "No, we have no consistent data base;" "Sometimes aircraft are just aircraft." One would think the Air Force's detailed count in its so-called "Statistical Digest" would help, but parts of it are not available to the public, and the parts that are would seem to require mysticism to interpret, rather than mere familiarity with Arabic numbers.

Therefore, a simple – even simplistic – analysis that tracks the budgets of the military services (readily available from the Greenbook) together with the annual force structure of the Army, Navy, and Air Force is not easy to put together. Unless, that is, if you consult a remarkable analysis by Franklin C. Spinney, "Defense Death Spiral," put together in the late 1990s and available at http://www.d-n-i.net/fcs/defense_death_spiral/contents.htm.

While I should reveal that Spinney is a personal friend and a colleague over the years, I must also say his extraordinary analysis is far from simplistic; using unclassified data available inside the Pentagon, he put together a comprehensive work of 75 briefing slides. It addresses the Pentagon's budget, the military services' force structure and modernization programs, military readiness and training, and the resources spent for each. Inter alia, it stands alone as an evaluation of what we get for our money. Its conclusion - that America's defense forces have been shrinking, aging, and becoming less ready to fight, at increasing cost – is unassailable.

The problem is that Spinney's briefing is now several years old. It does not include two important subsequent developments: 1) the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the additional money appropriated for them, along with the additional stress the wars have imposed on the people and equipment in our armed forces, and 2) the additional funding that has been put into the Pentagon's budget, other than what has been spent in Iraq and Afghanistan. One would hope that, despite the human and material stress of the wars, the fundamentally negative trends Spinney found in the1990s would have been ameliorated. Indeed, the so-called baseline (or "base") DOD budget, which is supposed to exclude war-related spending, has increased – in constant dollars – from $370.8 billion in 2001 to $518.3 billion,[4] a 40 percent increase, in 2009. It would be hoped that one of the largest increases in "peacetime" military spending since World War II would have brought some redress to the shrinking, aging, less ready nature of the higher cost military that Spinney found and documented.

However, the increase in non-war spending since 2001 has been significantly larger than the 40 percent cited above. Both the military services and Congress have crammed non-war spending into the "war" supplementals that have been enacted each year since 2002. Items such as additional C-17, V-22, F-16, and other aircraft, which are highly unlikely to ever see service in Iraq or Afghanistan, have been added as well as money for a reorganization of the Army, initiated well before the wars started, an expansion of the Army and Marine Corps, which also is unlikely to show any presence in the wars, plus much else. The problem is that no specific measurement has been made of this non-war spending in the "war supplemetals." Each year's war funding measures contain several billions that are readily identifiable, plus other amounts that are not so easily identified and which would require a detailed analysis of budget data that are not publicly available.[5]

Were anyone with access to the detailed Pentagon accounts to set out upon that analysis, they would encounter the chaos of the Pentagon's financial records. Finding just what that has actually been spent for the wars, and what has not, will be no easy task. The financial books are literally incompetent – according to all too many years of reporting by GAO, CRS, and the Pentagon's own Inspector General (DOD IG). The precise amount of non-war spending in the war supplementals could only be identified after many, many man hours of auditing and investigation, and it may never be fully known, thanks to the Pentagon's very deficient self-management.

We can only say at this point that the 40% increase in the baseline Pentagon budget is an understatement of how much has been available to address the concerns Spinney identified. Understatement or not, the amount is considerable. Comparing actual Pentagon base budgets to the base budgets planned when George W. Bush came to office for the years from 2001 to 2005 (and extrapolating out the same planned rate of increase to 2009) computes to over $770 billion[6] added to the base Pentagon spending plan since 2001.

In other words, almost three quarters of a trillion dollars over has been added above the level of Defense Department spending planned just before George W. Bush was inaugurated; none of it has been specified for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; it is a "peacetime" addition to the defense budget. One would hope that it has been used effectively to address the problems – the shrinking, the aging, the reduced readiness – that Spinney identified.

But it has not; the added money has not reversed these trends, some of which are now significantly worse.

Winslow T. Wheeler spent 31 years working on Capitol Hill with senators from both political parties and the Government Accountability Office, specializing in national security affairs. Currently, he directs the Straus Military Reform Project of the Center for Defense Information in Washington and is author of The Wastrels of Defense.

Notes

[1] "Real" dollars are those adjusted for inflation. In dollars not adjusted for inflation, the 2008 budget (at $670 billion) is 63 times higher than the post-World War II 1947 Pentagon budget of $10.6 billion.
[2] If one were to also count Department of Energy nuclear weapons costs ($17 billion) and miscellaneous defense costs in other federal agencies ($3.8 billion), the total so-called "National Defense" budget function, used by OMB, would come to $693.2 billion. If other defense-related costs in the Departments of Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs, and State, some retirement costs in the Department of the Treasury, and DOD's share (21%) of the annual interest on the national debt were also to be counted, the grand total for all national security related costs for the 2008 federal budget would come to $926.8 billion.
[3] This publication, officially titled "National Defense Budget Estimates" can be found for recent fiscal years at the website of the Defense Department's Comptroller at http://www.defenselink.mil/comptroller/def...2009/index.html.
[4] Constant 2009 dollars.
[5] That analysis is not performed here; it would best be done by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the Government Accountability Office (GAO), or any of the hundreds of hired "professional staffers" on Capitol Hill working for committees and subcommittees purporting to exercise oversight of the defense budget. Each of those entities has access to the requisite detailed budget data.
[6] The dollars counted here are "current year" dollars. The calculation in 2008 or 2009 dollars would be a larger number.
Snuffysmith
MILITARY -- JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR SAYS MILITARY READY TO REPEAL 'DON'T ASK DON'T TELL': On Sunday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen told graduating cadets at the U.S. Military Academy that the military was ready to accept gay servicemembers if Congress repeals the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) policy. "It's a law, and we follow it," Mullen said. Should the law change, the military will carry that out too," he said. Mullen's statement is a refreshing change from the rhetoric that has come from other Bush administration officials. In March 2007, then-Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Peter Pace stated publicly that homosexuality is "immoral" and that he supported DADT because "we should not condone immoral acts." Mullen is also reflecting the growing rejection of DADT among the public and the military. A 2004 poll found that a majority of junior enlisted servicemembers believed gays and lesbians should be allowed to service openly in the military, up from 16 percent in 1992. The Military Readiness Enhancement Act, which would lift the ban on openly gay servicemembers, currently has the support of 142 lawmakers.
Snuffysmith
According to Pentagon records, "[m]ore than 43,000 U.S. troops listed as medically unfit for combat in the weeks before their scheduled deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan since 2003 were sent anyway." Veterans groups say this "reliance on troops found medically 'non-deployable' is another sign of stress placed on a military that has sent 1.6 million servicemembers to the war zones."
Snuffysmith
Pentagon Drops Post in Pakistan for Top General - Eric Schmitt, New York Times
Army's 'Stop-loss' Orders Up Dramatically - Julian Barnes, Los Angeles Times
Age, Mold Assail Military Barracks - Alan Gomez, US Today
GI Benefits Stymie Funding Bill - Richard Wolf, US Today
Department Begins Roles, Missions Review - Jim Garamone, AFPS
Inside the Ring - Bill Gertz, Washington Times
Disenfranchised Over There - von Spakovsky and Buhler, Weekly Standard opinion
A Better GI Bill - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump

US DEFENSE CONTRACTORS

The Lucrative Art of War - New York Times editorial
War's Shopping Cart - Nick Turse, Los Angeles Times opinion

Snuffysmith

The Military's Pricey Restaurant Tastes: Gone Are the Days of Grunts Peeling Potatoes

Nick Turse, Metropolitan Books

ForeignPolicy: Judging by the Pentagon's own accounting, the army, navy, air force and marines have been very hungry -- and they've been chowing down.
Snuffysmith

VA Retreats on Voter Registration Efforts for Wounded Veterans

Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet

Democracy and Elections: The Department of Veterans Affairs says it will help ex-soldiers to register and vote, yet it won't allow registration drives on VA facilities.
Snuffysmith
A Navy Man Looks Out for the Army - Anna Mulrine, US News and World Report
Military Considering New Cremation Policies - Associated Press

Snuffysmith
Man Held is Not Leader of Al-Qaeda in Iraq - Freeman and Sabah, Washington Post
US Military Denies Iraq Report of al-Qaida Arrest - Associated Press
Leader of al-Qaida in Iraq Has Not Been Captured - Voice of America
Iraq al-Qaeda Chief Not Captured - BBC News
US Military Denies al Masri in Custody - Bill Roggio, The Long War Journal
Snuffysmith
Pentagon Considers Adding Forces in Afghanistan...
The New York Times Sat May 03 2008 04:42:28 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Snuffysmith
Pentagon Is Open to Moving More Marines to Afghanistan
Snuffysmith
Defense Budget Overkill - Los Angeles Times editorial
The Suffering of Soldiers - New York Times editorial
Milblogs: Letters from War - Ashley Hoffman, Diplomatic Courier
Maybe the Army's Not So Hidebound Afterall - Fred Kaplan, Slate
Fred Kaplan, What a Mensch - Charlie, Abu Muqawama

Snuffysmith
Gates Praises MRAPs as Lifesavers - Tom Vanden Brook, USA Today
Air Combat by Remote Control - Brian Carney, Wall Street Journal opinion
Preventing an Arms Race in Outer Space - James Carroll, Boston Globe opinion
Webb Veterans Bill Misses the Mark - Washington Times editorial
Vietnam Ghosts - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Personal Responsibility - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump

Snuffysmith
Alexander Cockburn
Real Clear Numbers: 101,000 Casualties a Year
Snuffysmith
“Burying the Ghosts of Vietnam” - Bob Cassidy, Small Wars Journal
The Ghosts of Vietnam - Richard Fernandez, The Belmont Club
More Armor for MRAPs - Noah Shachtman, Danger Room
Vietnam Ghosts - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Gates in Touch with the Future, But... - Tom Barnett, Thomas PM Barnett
So Near Yet So Far - Richard Fernandez, The Belmont Club
Force Structure for Small Wars - Andrew Pavord, Small Wars Journal
Contracting Out Iraqi Army Advising - Peter Singer, The Brookings Institution
Top US Commando Says Strain of War Limits Forces - Associated Press
Personal Responsibility - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump

Snuffysmith
Pentagon Capers | The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Comedy Central</h2>Fmr. Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith may be schmuck-like, but he has enormous elastic balls.
www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=82151 - 43k -
Snuffysmith
Snuffysmith
Gates Urges Military to Focus on Current Wars - Josh White, Washington Post
Gates Says New Arms Must Play Role Now - Thom Shanker, New York Times
Gates Urges Focus on Needs in Iraq, Afghanistan - Julian Barnes, Los Angeles Times
Gates on Low-Intensity Warfare - Max Boot, Contentions
Gates’ Speech at Colorado Springs - David Betz, Kings of War
That's Why Abu Muqawama Loves You, Bobby - Abu Muqawama
“Burying the Ghosts of Vietnam” - Bob Cassidy, Small Wars Journal
Which “Ghosts” Should We Be Trying to Bury - Gian Gentile, Small Wars Journal
The Ghosts of Vietnam - Richard Fernandez, The Belmont Club
Vietnam Ghosts - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Contracting out Foreign Military Training - Matt Armstrong, MountainRunner
Understanding Smith-Mundt's Barriers - Matt Armstrong, MountainRunner
Sent to War by a Letter - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump

Snuffysmith

The Military Death Toll While Enforcing the Occupation of Iraq
by Paul de Rooij

Updated 20 March 2008

A regularly updated resource with links to many articles, quotes, and important information missing from mainstream news coverage about the war in Iraq.

Snuffysmith
Army's Next Crop of Generals Forged in COIN - Ann Scott Tyson, Washington Post
Gates Urges Military to Focus on Current Wars - Josh White, Washington Post
Gates Says New Arms Must Play Role Now - Thom Shanker, New York Times
Gates Urges Focus on Needs in Iraq, Afghanistan - Julian Barnes, Los Angeles Times
Gates on Low-Intensity Warfare - Max Boot, Contentions
Gates’ Speech at Colorado Springs - David Betz, Kings of War
Secretary Gates Gets a Case of Sloppy Thinking - Westhawk, Westhawk
That's Why Abu Muqawama Loves You, Bobby - Abu Muqawama
“Burying the Ghosts of Vietnam” - Bob Cassidy, Small Wars Journal
Which “Ghosts” Should We Be Trying to Bury - Gian Gentile, Small Wars Journal
The Ghosts of Vietnam - Richard Fernandez, The Belmont Club
Vietnam Ghosts - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Contracting out Foreign Military Training - Matt Armstrong, MountainRunner
Understanding Smith-Mundt's Barriers - Matt Armstrong, MountainRunner

Snuffysmith
U.S. military cuts ties with Chalabi Once a neocon favorite, he had 'unauthorized' contacts with Iran

Snuffysmith
DoD Scales Back AFRICOM Ambitions - Gordon Lubold, Christian Science Monitor
GI Bill Blues - Los Angeles Times editorial
Reagan and the Draft - Lawrence Korb, Washington Times opinion
Proper Promotions - Max Boot, Contentions
This is Promising News - David Betz, Kings of War
The New Generalship - Mark Safranski, ZenPundit
McMaster Promoted, Finally... - Abu Muqawama, Abu Muqawama
Last War, This War, Next War - Jules Crittenden, Forward Movement
Prisoners in Kosovo - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump

Snuffysmith
Gates Lauds Moves to Bolster Civilian Agencies - AFPS
Of Budgets and Priorities and the War of Ideas - Matt Armstrong, MountainRunner

Snuffysmith
EVENTS OF INTEREST

4-5 June 208 - 2008 Joint Symposium - Strategic Re-Assessment: From Long-Range Planning to Future Strategy and Forces (Public Event). Washington, D.C. Sponsored by the Institute for National Strategic Studies, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and US Joint Forces Command. Fundamental to the development and implementation of a successful future defense posture is a foundation comprised of a well-reasoned assessment of the future security environment, a clear understanding of the “realm of the possible” for and limitations of military forces, and an understanding of the nation’s security objectives. Developing an appropriate assessment of the future security environment is not something done in a vacuum as it is impossible to fully separate purely military or national security issues from other elements of the national and global environment. This is particularly true for the United States. Technical innovation and adaptation, the rise and decline of other actors on the international stage, domestic politics, globalization and its effects on trade, migration, communications, and the power of nonstate actors all, bear heavily on any security assessment. There is no shortage of assessments of the future security environment. In the last decade, National Defense University itself has produced several, most recently, Strategic Challenges – America’s Global Security Agenda. The objectives of this symposium are to examine some of these strategic assessments, to review our success at incorporating their key elements into strategic and operational plans, and to propose ways to institutionalize best practices into the process for future force development and joint force planning. We will explore these issues through a series of panel discussions and keynote addresses. Featured speakers will include military officers, government officials, and experts from research institutes.

17-19 June 208 - 3rd Annual North American Security Colloquium: Wars Without Borders (Public Event). Kingston, Ontario. Sponsored by the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College, Queen's Centre for International Relations, and Defence Management Studies at Queen's University, and the Canadian 'Forces' Land Doctrine and Training System. The conflicts today in Iraq and in Afghanistan are examples of what some leading scholars and many commanders have termed “continuous wars among the people.” This type of conflict is developing or occurring in other regions of the world, in Africa and in Latin America for example. In many of these situations traditional and legal borders no longer define or contain the conflict, nor do obvious sovereign entities control belligerents. International commitments to control these conflicts necessarily demand complex, multi-dimensional diplomatic, military, police, and humanitarian responses. What has been learned about such conflicts from operations in Iraq and Afghanistan may to some degree be transferable to conflicts in other regions. Assuming that the international community may well face future operations characterized by regional, borderless “wars among the people”, the centres at Queen’s University and their partners propose convening a distinguished group of approximately 200 experts from academic, military, governmental, and international institutions to examine how best to prepare commanders, military units and governments to plan for and conduct complex, multi-dimensional stability campaigns in this new environment.

16-18 September 2008 - The U.S. Army and the Interagency Process: A Historical Perspective (Public Event - Conference / Call for Papers). Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Sponsored by the U.S. Army Combat Studies Institute. The symposium will include a variety of guest speakers, panel sessions, and general discussions. This symposium will explore the partnership between the U.S. Army and government agencies in attaining national goals and objectives in peace and war within a historical context. Separate international topics may be presented. The symposium will also examine current issues, dilemmas, problems, trends, and practices associated with U.S. Army operations requiring close interagency cooperation.

Snuffysmith
Editorial: Fixing the Military
Snuffysmith
Our Finest Sons and Daughters - Phillip Carter, Intel Dump
Army (Exoskeleton) or Marines (V-22)? - Herschel Smith, The Captain's Journal
Darpa's Greatest Hits and Misses - Sharon Weinberger, Danger Room
New GI Bill - Philadelphia Inquirer editorial
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.