http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washingt...1&ref=media

Okay now that the NY Times finally got 8000 pages ( Two years after FOIA suits) on this psy-op to get the American public to swallow the propaganda delivered through the willing, compliant, cooperating media especially on the Iraq war, have you heard any uproar, not a word out of the co-conspirators in this collusion .

Shame on all, to me this is treasonous.And even more so is sending the troops on such a trumped up mission. There certainly seem to be ample grounds for impeachments. Not only on the POTUS, V-POTUS, DOD officials and the retired officers. Here they are, mercenary media employees and extra pay from DOD plus their retirement pay, which also IMO should be eliminated.

This is just not tolerable. I hope you each take time to read the whole article in the link as well as the Q&A with the article's author and the publicly submitted comments.

And have you heard any apologies for this betrayal of public trust, either by the media or the involved "Expert Analyst". Mouths for hire, no ethics no moral values, just lie as instructed and pick up your check or get a bunch of DOD contracts.



lenal

The problem is the NYT was co-opted on the invasion.

They carried all the cheerleadering rants for the war at the time.
Now they want to claim everyone was mislead. Who mislead them?

Liberal buyers remorse...common folk knew better...and still do.

They were correct in endorsing Mrs. Clinton...but now they hedge...
liberals have no roots. It's why I'm a conservative Democrat.
Liberals have no individual roots...they waiver...flip-flop and lose
all populist support as a result. They have a senator of worth and yet they
wring ther hands...its the weakness of liberalism...that has been crushed
by Republicans for years. Choose a side and fight...or wring your hands.

Two wrongs do not add up to right in the moral sense. If that is liberal so be it........I consider myself liberal because it it a relative term to distinguish myself from the extreme right wing neocons. In fact in those considerations there are few on here that would use the term conservative, too often labels mean only what the person using it chooses to have it mean at any particular moment it is applied. I didn't buy any of the BS, I believed Hans Blix and Scott Ridder. The AUMF has been phony military tool used for purely political and economic goals wrapped up in patriotism and the flag.

And yeah, NYT had some of the plants like Judy Miller that were a part of the psyop gang. Schooled by Scooter.

I have roots......wonder what you mean by that declaration " liberals have no individual roots. They waiver and flip-flop and lose "etc.......Speak just for yourself, as I am doing here. Neither of us have the license to speak for others.


Attack the messenger seems to be your response to my topic post.

I object.


lenal

.

The PBS News Hour is doing a segment on this story in my time zone right now.


lenal