QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 2 2008, 06:16 PM)

George W.'s War
... a bedtime story for children age 3-5, aseptisized, glorified and obfuscated by Marine.
QUOTE
No one likes war. War is a horrific affair, bloody and expensive.
Sending our men and women into battle to perhaps die or be maimed is an unconscionable thought.
Yet some wars need to be waged, and someone needs to lead.
War is the result when an aggressive nation, interested in quick profits and generally lacking creativity, imagination and empathy, attempts to impose by force, destruction, death and terror, it's will over another nation, to grab it's land, or resources, or some strategic asset, or to exercise a forceful control over the attacked nation, as to make it serve the interests of the forceful nation, and when the attacked nation decides to retaliate with the objective to either destroy or disable the attacking force to render it harmless, or to discourage the attacking force from pursuing it's effort, before convincing the attacking force, whether through
a counter war or diplomacy, to surrender any gains made at the expense of the attacked nation, and eventually to compensate the damage caused by the attacking nation.
From the forceful nation's point of view, sending men and women to attack and kill other people, or convice them to risk their limbs and lives for an objective, that in ***ALL*** cases short of resisting imminent extermination, does not improve these people's daily conditions of life, except those winning privileges from their rank in the chain of command, from this forceful nation's poibnt of view, people are a cheap, expendable commodity, easy to deceive, to achieve domestic economical or political gains, or to reach a specific status among all the parties in the world.
From the attacked nation's viewpoint, short of correctly assessing, and informing the people of the attacker's motivations and formal demands, the first duty of the attacked nation's leadership is to execute defensive operations following prepared plans in an attempt to disable the attacking forces, provided the nature of the attack is correctly assessed and provided defense plans correctly addresses the kind of the attack.
Eventually these plans involve men and women and include major risks to their lives to achieve the objectives of these plans. Short of addressing the nature of the attack, the attacked nation's leadership duty is, in recognition of the infinite value of it's people lives, and
to guarantee the nation it's constituency, namely it's people, to inform them of the failure of the initial defense plans, and open negotiations with the attacking nation.
On recognizing it's incapacity to defend the people it serves, either through defensive operations or negotiations, the leadership's final duty, before finally resigning in light of it's failure, is to inform the people that they are left with the choice of attempting to survive the hazards of warfare as civilians throughout the outcome of the war, including the risk of enslavement and extermination, or to join any resistance movement and deny the attacking nation any of it's wrongfully confiscated gains to raise the cost of waging war to levels far greater than any gains that can be won throuigh negotiations.
QUOTE
The citizenry and Congress are often ambivalent or largely opposed to any given war. It's up to our leader to convince them. That's why we call the leader "Commander in Chief."
The President of the US is called "Commander-in-Chief" because he is given the responsibility to carry out the decisions made by Congress, representative of the People.
The decision to wage war is the sole decision of Congress, in accordance with the USC, and *all* treaties that are to be considered as law of the land.
The President remains in all times subordinated to Congress.QUOTE
George W.'s war was no different. There was lots of resistance to it. Many in Congress were vehemently against the idea. The Commander in Chief had to lobby for legislative approval.
Along with supporters, George W. used the force of his convictions, the power of his title and every ounce of moral suasion he could muster to rally support. He had to assure Congress and the public that the war was morally justified, winnable and affordable.
Congress eventually came around and voted overwhelmingly to wage war.
George W Bush has repetitively initimidated, lied to, coerced and corrupted members of Congress into granting him unconstitutional powers and to renounce to carry on it's duty to indict the POTUS for his criminal acts.
George W Bush has repetitively lied to the People, through the use of pompous metaphors, with the criminal assistance of Congress that renounced it's duty to investigate and prosecute George W Bush constitutional crimes, it's duty to request unambiguous replies to it's questions, it's duty to duely and accurately inform the People of the POTUS violations of the Constitution, and it's duty to denounce and sanction the POTUS systematic obfuscation of his reports to Congress and to the People.
QUOTE
George W. then lobbied .... Congress began to drag its feet about funding the effort.
Many who had voted to support the war ...
Congress is directly responsible for the Nation's state of bankruptcy.
Congress is directly responsible in waging wars of aggression on foreign nations by renouncing to call the POTUS to comply to the US constitution.
Both the POTUS and Congress have broken their oaths by failing to comply and support the US constitution.
Both the POTUS and Congress are directly responsible for the
shattering of the constituency, namely the destruction of the nation.
QUOTE
So on that historic day, Oct. 19, 1781, in a place called Yorktown , a satisfied George Washington sat upon his beautiful white horse and accepted the surrender of Lord Cornwallis, effectively ending the Revolutionary War.
As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible, avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering, also, that timely disbursements, to prepare for danger, frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions, in time of peace, to discharge the debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear. . . .
Towards the preservation of your Government and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only, that you steadily discountenance irregular opposition to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretext. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the Constitution, alterations which will impair the energy of the system; and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown. . . . .
It is important likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution in those intrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department, to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power and proneness to abuse it, which predominate in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position.
The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasion of the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield. . . .
General George Washington, Farewell Address, September 17, 1796.