Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: BIDEN & BAYH... the short list according to the am news
Common Ground Common Sense > Online Café > Online Café > Online Café Archive
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
tazvil04
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:32 AM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 12:30 PM) *
QUOTE(Terra @ Aug 19 2008, 10:28 AM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 09:25 AM) *
Its a ruse.

He did that purposely to keep the specualtion away from Bayh.


Ya! I think you're on to something. Why would the agent of change pick Biden - a lifelong insider versus a fresh new face, at least to most of the U.S. smile.gif I definitely see room for Biden in other area's though.

PLUS - he'd be setting Bayh up to to run on his own after Obama.


I agree. I see him as a top choice for Secretary of State. I do not think there is any doubt about that. thumbsup.gif


yawn

you are getting as boring as bayh

you hate biden, but want him as sec. of state? That is bizarre.


I never said I hated Biden. Stop putting words in my mouth. I think he would be a lousy choice for Vice President, but an excellent choice for Secretary of State.

My bone with Biden I have said was his support for Condi Rice. He was all chummy chummy with her. It was such pandering.

Graham if you listen I am always acting for a result --- the result is Obama being elected.

I have been saying for years that we need to expand our message to be a 50 state message and speak the language that they speak in the red states.

Bayh can speak it. Biden cannot.

The reason I believe this is because I firmly believe that the Democratic party's positions are endorsed by most Americans, but we do not sell them well. A red stater like Bayh can sell them. He is someone that the middle America will trust because he is one of their own.

I want Obama to win. With Biden, Obama exposes hmiself to being accused of picking a same old same old insider -- and he highlights his foreign policy inexperience which he has said is his strength.

tazvil04
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:35 AM) *
bayh is hillary
I would rather it be obvious than hidden

If Bayh is VP, Obama will not last out two years, then Hillary will be Bayh's VP and your Bayh will disappear and Hillary will become president
then Jeb her VP
by then it will be too late for you to say, Damn, Graham was right all along,why didn't I see it back then (but then, that's my job).


Who's getting boring now?

Yadda, yadda, yadda...
Terra
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 09:33 AM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:29 AM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 12:24 PM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:13 AM) *
QUOTE(Terra @ Aug 19 2008, 12:05 PM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 06:28 AM) *
THE POST FROM YESTERDAY

Stop with your trash personal insult talk taz and beamer. Not very civil.

What a hypocrite beamer- you rail against the democrats in the senate, then you HOPE the democrats lose a seat solely so you can yap the next four years.
How trite.
If you say you don't want war, but vote for AIPAC's #2 man after Lieberman, how hypocritical is that?????? (like d'uh)........
If you didn't vote for Gore - EVERYTHING the last 8 years is those people's fault. EVERYTHING.So YOU must want war to continue.
Ya's can't have it both ways.

BTW- why isn't Obama doing better? Because HIS FIRM BASE DOESN'T LIKE HIM PANDERING TO PEOPLE WHO GOT US INTO THE MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE
SO LOSE THE BASE, YOU GOT NOTHING AT ALL.


IT WILL BE YOUR FAULT THE TWO OF YOU IF OBAMA LOSES BECAUSE THE CORE BASE DON'T VOTE.

I WON'T VOTE FOR BAYH.


So now you're admitting Obama isn't doing better as he was expected to do..



no, I am answering those who use that logic

Historically, NO candidate has had a big lead in August

But if his CORE BASE don't vote for him, he won't win. (that is the left)...
Everytime someone mentions Bayh, it helps McCain
Everytime someone mentions Hillary, it helps McCain

We don't want Lamont/Lieberman2


The core base of the Democratic party is pro-union pro jobs pro economic growth -- and so is Evan Bayh.

You are an enigma Graham. You spend the whole year promoting Barack Obama and now he gets the nomination and you say you will not vote for him if he chooses Evan Bayh. Talk about wishy washy -- you want to trust a candidate to be President of the US, but you refuse to endorse his judgment on Vice President...

Seems a little hypocritical to me...


I consider Bayh Hillary's toy
I told you before I wouldn't vote for Obama if he picks Hillary either
why bother it's the same as Hillary being president and we won to ensure that don't happen

one day you'll figure it out

either way, I don't care if you do or don't think its hypocritical because its constant

0

It is more important to lose and get rid of the Clinton's then compromise and keep the clinton's 50 percent is better than zero and Hillary will be blamed if Obama loses, and Obama will run again in 2012 and win then. So would rather win or lose without a Clinton ever again.

The Clinton's ruined America sure as their name is Bush.


Its funny you have said you would prefer HRC to Evan Bayh --- even though the former might cost OBama the election and would put your principal in there...

Why is that?

You suggest that I will learn some day.

I doubt it.

I do not have such paranoia as you do. Frankly, I hope I never do. It can't make for too happy a life.


Besides - What is wrong with being a toy!
tazvil04
QUOTE(Terra @ Aug 19 2008, 10:40 AM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 09:33 AM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:29 AM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 12:24 PM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:13 AM) *
QUOTE(Terra @ Aug 19 2008, 12:05 PM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 06:28 AM) *
THE POST FROM YESTERDAY

Stop with your trash personal insult talk taz and beamer. Not very civil.

What a hypocrite beamer- you rail against the democrats in the senate, then you HOPE the democrats lose a seat solely so you can yap the next four years.
How trite.
If you say you don't want war, but vote for AIPAC's #2 man after Lieberman, how hypocritical is that?????? (like d'uh)........
If you didn't vote for Gore - EVERYTHING the last 8 years is those people's fault. EVERYTHING.So YOU must want war to continue.
Ya's can't have it both ways.

BTW- why isn't Obama doing better? Because HIS FIRM BASE DOESN'T LIKE HIM PANDERING TO PEOPLE WHO GOT US INTO THE MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE
SO LOSE THE BASE, YOU GOT NOTHING AT ALL.


IT WILL BE YOUR FAULT THE TWO OF YOU IF OBAMA LOSES BECAUSE THE CORE BASE DON'T VOTE.

I WON'T VOTE FOR BAYH.


So now you're admitting Obama isn't doing better as he was expected to do..



no, I am answering those who use that logic

Historically, NO candidate has had a big lead in August

But if his CORE BASE don't vote for him, he won't win. (that is the left)...
Everytime someone mentions Bayh, it helps McCain
Everytime someone mentions Hillary, it helps McCain

We don't want Lamont/Lieberman2


The core base of the Democratic party is pro-union pro jobs pro economic growth -- and so is Evan Bayh.

You are an enigma Graham. You spend the whole year promoting Barack Obama and now he gets the nomination and you say you will not vote for him if he chooses Evan Bayh. Talk about wishy washy -- you want to trust a candidate to be President of the US, but you refuse to endorse his judgment on Vice President...

Seems a little hypocritical to me...


I consider Bayh Hillary's toy
I told you before I wouldn't vote for Obama if he picks Hillary either
why bother it's the same as Hillary being president and we won to ensure that don't happen

one day you'll figure it out

either way, I don't care if you do or don't think its hypocritical because its constant

0

It is more important to lose and get rid of the Clinton's then compromise and keep the clinton's 50 percent is better than zero and Hillary will be blamed if Obama loses, and Obama will run again in 2012 and win then. So would rather win or lose without a Clinton ever again.

The Clinton's ruined America sure as their name is Bush.


Its funny you have said you would prefer HRC to Evan Bayh --- even though the former might cost OBama the election and would put your principal in there...

Why is that?

You suggest that I will learn some day.

I doubt it.

I do not have such paranoia as you do. Frankly, I hope I never do. It can't make for too happy a life.


Besides - What is wrong with being a toy!


Egg-zactly.... thumbsup.gif

My thought is that Bayh was using Hillary. He wanted to be VP and he thought she was his best shot.

Well, now that he will be VP he could care a less about the Clintons. They may be friends, but that's it...
rla
I think having two minority group males on the ticket would be hard to overcome but I
prefer that to either Biden or Bayh.
Beamer
Maybe Joe’s trip to Georgia is a signal to the Obama camp about the job he really wants.
Arneoker
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 12:40 PM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:35 AM) *
bayh is hillary
I would rather it be obvious than hidden

If Bayh is VP, Obama will not last out two years, then Hillary will be Bayh's VP and your Bayh will disappear and Hillary will become president
then Jeb her VP
by then it will be too late for you to say, Damn, Graham was right all along,why didn't I see it back then (but then, that's my job).


Who's getting boring now?

Yadda, yadda, yadda...

Actually though I think that Graham's story here is interesting. But I think that my son's story about McCain coming into our house to take $1 million from him was a better story. (I learned several things from him that evening in just a few short words!)
graham4anything
QUOTE(rla @ Aug 19 2008, 12:43 PM) *
I think having two minority group males on the ticket would be hard to overcome but I
prefer that to either Biden or Bayh.



I would too.

Sebilius
Bloomberg(Jewish)
Richardson
Powell

taz-you all keep thinking I need meds? Reread your answer-Evan is a MADE MAN of the Bushclinton machine
I think your tears of sorrow now that Evan is not the VP has warped your thinking
graham4anything
QUOTE(Beamer @ Aug 19 2008, 12:47 PM) *
Maybe Joe’s trip to Georgia is a signal to the Obama camp about the job he really wants.


if you actually want Bayh, it means 100% of ALL your posts in the past not about Bayh were a lie.
Because the other 98% of them are at 100% polar diffeences than Bayh

so guess your siding with RealDem all this time was a crock of spit
Terra
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 09:50 AM) *
QUOTE(rla @ Aug 19 2008, 12:43 PM) *
I think having two minority group males on the ticket would be hard to overcome but I
prefer that to either Biden or Bayh.



I would too.

Sebilius
Bloomberg(Jewish)
Richardson
Powell

taz-you all keep thinking I need meds? Reread your answer-Evan is a MADE MAN of the Bushclinton machine
I think your tears of sorrow now that Evan is not the VP has warped your thinking


I'll go along with your list G - except Sebilius. If they try and run 2 minority groups at the same time, I'm seriously afraid it won't fly.
Terra
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 09:51 AM) *
QUOTE(Beamer @ Aug 19 2008, 12:47 PM) *
Maybe Joe’s trip to Georgia is a signal to the Obama camp about the job he really wants.


if you actually want Bayh, it means 100% of ALL your posts in the past not about Bayh were a lie.
Because the other 98% of them are at 100% polar diffeences than Bayh

so guess your siding with RealDem all this time was a crock of spit


Hey we are just flip-flopping here is all - which now days means changing your mind as circumstances change. cool.gif
Arneoker
I am now absolutely convinced.

John McCain really did come into my house and take $1 million from my son.

And I am sure that if McCain did not do that that my son would have shared some of that money with me, and I sure could have used it!
Marine
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 18 2008, 10:11 AM) *
Why would Barack choose someone to help on foreign policy and national security if these are the areas he is most comfortable with and the most daunting issues facing this nation are economic and a Sen. from DE does nothing to help shore up the midwest which Obama needs to win in Nov.?

If foreign policy and national security is Obama's forte' we are in deep do-do if he gts elected.
Marine
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 18 2008, 11:46 AM) *
Obama looked vulnearable?

He gained 15 points in the last 10 days, another 2 weeks and Hillary would have been toast

bad analogy

mcCain is not even running in Mass.

15 points? I hate to tell you Graham, Germany doesn't count.
tazvil04
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:26 AM) *
QUOTE(Terra @ Aug 19 2008, 12:23 PM) *
QUOTE
But if his CORE BASE don't vote for him, he won't win. (that is the left)...


Astute observation.


I figure you are being sarcastic

But Obama needs the left, not the right
He can win without the right
he will lose without the left

in 2000 and 2004, if you say it wasn't stolen, then it was because the core voters did not vote, because of the pandering to the right
though I don't buy that as it was stolen, just saying if it isn't

I think it will be Biden, who is acceptable to the left if it has to be.


He'll get the left.

He's the anti-war Obaminator...
tazvil04
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 18 2008, 10:46 AM) *
Obama looked vulnearable?

He gained 15 points in the last 10 days, another 2 weeks and Hillary would have been toast

bad analogy

mcCain is not even running in Mass.


Graham what polls are you looking at?
tazvil04
QUOTE(rla @ Aug 19 2008, 10:43 AM) *
I think having two minority group males on the ticket would be hard to overcome but I
prefer that to either Biden or Bayh.


As I posted yesterday its about time this nation grew up and got rid of its xenophobia...

So I would not have a problem with that ticket.
graham4anything
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 01:19 PM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 18 2008, 10:46 AM) *
Obama looked vulnearable?

He gained 15 points in the last 10 days, another 2 weeks and Hillary would have been toast

bad analogy

mcCain is not even running in Mass.


Graham what polls are you looking at?


talk about something out of place

This was the Mass. primary

Hillary was winning by 35 points or 40

then Teddy and Kerry endorsed Obama, and Hillary only won by a handful, Obama closed the gap 15-25 points

another 2 weeks, Hillary would have easily lost Mass.
tazvil04
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 10:50 AM) *
QUOTE(rla @ Aug 19 2008, 12:43 PM) *
I think having two minority group males on the ticket would be hard to overcome but I
prefer that to either Biden or Bayh.



I would too.

Sebilius
Bloomberg(Jewish)
Richardson
Powell

taz-you all keep thinking I need meds? Reread your answer-Evan is a MADE MAN of the Bushclinton machine
I think your tears of sorrow now that Evan is not the VP has warped your thinking


Well, what I have seen is today -- unlike yesterday and the day before --- Bayh's name is apparently back in favor and Obama's express mention of Biden is likely a signal it is not Biden...which leaves Kaine (a neophyte) or Bayh (well experienced).

amy
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 18 2008, 10:11 AM) *
Why would Barack choose someone to help on foreign policy and national security if these are the areas he is most comfortable with and the most daunting issues facing this nation are economic and a Sen. from DE does nothing to help shore up the midwest which Obama needs to win in Nov.?

If foreign policy and national security is Obama's forte' we are in deep do-do if he gts elected.


If you like GW's brand of foreign policy, you're right...Mccain's the man to vote for.
graham4anything
Howard Finneman thinks its Biden (he has talked to the finalists)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26288748
Biden the clear frontrunner for Veep

By Howard Fineman
MSNBC
updated 2 hours, 19 minutes ago


Howard Fineman



ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - Within the last few hours I've spoken with two of the finalists for the role of Barack Obama's running-mate, and to two other sources who are close to the process.

My bottom line is this: Barring a big surprise or last-minute change of heart, the choice is likely to be Sen. Joe Biden of Deleware, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

He is a lively and feisty if unpredictable campaigner with working-class roots and a street-level feel for the hot spots of the globe — which he can use to go toe-to-toe with Sen. John McCain.

"If I had to bet my life on it, I'd bet it is Joe," said one of the other contenders.

Said another, "Barack is moving toward a seasoned Beltway type, and that probably means Biden."

NiteOwl
QUOTE(amy @ Aug 19 2008, 01:25 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 18 2008, 10:11 AM) *
Why would Barack choose someone to help on foreign policy and national security if these are the areas he is most comfortable with and the most daunting issues facing this nation are economic and a Sen. from DE does nothing to help shore up the midwest which Obama needs to win in Nov.?

If foreign policy and national security is Obama's forte' we are in deep do-do if he gts elected.


If you like GW's brand of foreign policy, you're right...Mccain's the man to vote for.



If you want to see those mushroom clouds... Aren't they pretty ?

Then... vote for Neo-con McCain.

Marine
QUOTE(amy @ Aug 19 2008, 12:25 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 18 2008, 10:11 AM) *
Why would Barack choose someone to help on foreign policy and national security if these are the areas he is most comfortable with and the most daunting issues facing this nation are economic and a Sen. from DE does nothing to help shore up the midwest which Obama needs to win in Nov.?

If foreign policy and national security is Obama's forte' we are in deep do-do if he gts elected.


If you like GW's brand of foreign policy, you're right...Mccain's the man to vote for.

What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?
Marine
QUOTE(NiteOwl @ Aug 19 2008, 12:31 PM) *
QUOTE(amy @ Aug 19 2008, 01:25 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 18 2008, 10:11 AM) *
Why would Barack choose someone to help on foreign policy and national security if these are the areas he is most comfortable with and the most daunting issues facing this nation are economic and a Sen. from DE does nothing to help shore up the midwest which Obama needs to win in Nov.?

If foreign policy and national security is Obama's forte' we are in deep do-do if he gts elected.


If you like GW's brand of foreign policy, you're right...Mccain's the man to vote for.



If you want to see those mushroom clouds... Aren't they pretty ?

Then... vote for Neo-con McCain.

Keep convincing me; then when McCain beats Obama by one vote I'd like to see your response.
amy
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:37 PM) *
QUOTE(amy @ Aug 19 2008, 12:25 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 18 2008, 10:11 AM) *
Why would Barack choose someone to help on foreign policy and national security if these are the areas he is most comfortable with and the most daunting issues facing this nation are economic and a Sen. from DE does nothing to help shore up the midwest which Obama needs to win in Nov.?

If foreign policy and national security is Obama's forte' we are in deep do-do if he gts elected.


If you like GW's brand of foreign policy, you're right...Mccain's the man to vote for.

What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?


Marine...you can't think beyond your backyard.....xenophobic, too.
Arneoker
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:37 PM) *
What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?

You really do wonder about that? What other things do you wonder about? Do you wonder if McCain thinks of himself as a Panamanian?
tazvil04
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 11:30 AM) *
Howard Finneman thinks its Biden (he has talked to the finalists)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26288748
Biden the clear frontrunner for Veep

By Howard Fineman
MSNBC
updated 2 hours, 19 minutes ago


Howard Fineman



ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - Within the last few hours I've spoken with two of the finalists for the role of Barack Obama's running-mate, and to two other sources who are close to the process.

My bottom line is this: Barring a big surprise or last-minute change of heart, the choice is likely to be Sen. Joe Biden of Deleware, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

He is a lively and feisty if unpredictable campaigner with working-class roots and a street-level feel for the hot spots of the globe — which he can use to go toe-to-toe with Sen. John McCain.

"If I had to bet my life on it, I'd bet it is Joe," said one of the other contenders.

Said another, "Barack is moving toward a seasoned Beltway type, and that probably means Biden."


Now I know its Bayh.

He's talked to the finalists -- so because Biden gives the strongest denial he's the choice? Rofl2.gif
amy
QUOTE(Arneoker @ Aug 19 2008, 01:40 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:37 PM) *
What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?

You really do wonder about that? What other things do you wonder about? Do you wonder if McCain thinks of himself as a Panamanian?


McCain thinks he's the ultimate American...Marine would agree with him.
tazvil04
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 11:38 AM) *
QUOTE(NiteOwl @ Aug 19 2008, 12:31 PM) *
QUOTE(amy @ Aug 19 2008, 01:25 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 18 2008, 10:11 AM) *
Why would Barack choose someone to help on foreign policy and national security if these are the areas he is most comfortable with and the most daunting issues facing this nation are economic and a Sen. from DE does nothing to help shore up the midwest which Obama needs to win in Nov.?

If foreign policy and national security is Obama's forte' we are in deep do-do if he gts elected.


If you like GW's brand of foreign policy, you're right...Mccain's the man to vote for.



If you want to see those mushroom clouds... Aren't they pretty ?

Then... vote for Neo-con McCain.

Keep convincing me; then when McCain beats Obama by one vote I'd like to see your response.


If Obama loses by one vote in TX I'll eat my hat. cool.gif
Arneoker
QUOTE(amy @ Aug 19 2008, 01:41 PM) *
QUOTE(Arneoker @ Aug 19 2008, 01:40 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:37 PM) *
What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?

You really do wonder about that? What other things do you wonder about? Do you wonder if McCain thinks of himself as a Panamanian?


McCain thinks he's the ultimate American...Marine would agree with him.

I don't know Amy, from Marine's post one could reasonably think that he wonders about all sorts of things that most people take for granted!
graham4anything
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 01:41 PM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 11:30 AM) *
Howard Finneman thinks its Biden (he has talked to the finalists)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26288748
Biden the clear frontrunner for Veep

By Howard Fineman
MSNBC
updated 2 hours, 19 minutes ago


Howard Fineman



ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - Within the last few hours I've spoken with two of the finalists for the role of Barack Obama's running-mate, and to two other sources who are close to the process.

My bottom line is this: Barring a big surprise or last-minute change of heart, the choice is likely to be Sen. Joe Biden of Deleware, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

He is a lively and feisty if unpredictable campaigner with working-class roots and a street-level feel for the hot spots of the globe — which he can use to go toe-to-toe with Sen. John McCain.

"If I had to bet my life on it, I'd bet it is Joe," said one of the other contenders.

Said another, "Barack is moving toward a seasoned Beltway type, and that probably means Biden."


Now I know its Bayh.

He's talked to the finalists -- so because Biden gives the strongest denial he's the choice? Rofl2.gif



and you thought Dick Gephardt was the vp in 2004
Arneoker
Here is my prediction:

Someone here will have egg on their face in just a few days.

And that someone may very well be employing some very elaborate egg removal techniques...
graham4anything
well arneoker- I was the one who was independent of the Edwards/Clark people in 2004...and I saw Edwards for what he was from day one
you on the other hand still defend him
by the way-I am not saying it won't be bayh- I am saying if it is, we are all dead emotinally and actually, because it will mean hillary won.

here's another article-

Barack Obama chooses Kathleen Sebelius for Vice President
August 18, 2008
We have a credible lead that Barack Obama will be announcing Kathleen Sebelius for Vice President / VP.
http://www.tribbleagency.com/?p=1747
Our sources work within an ad agency that is hired by the Obama campaign, and have noted that the vast majority of the discussions there are regarding material logistics in terms of Kathleen on the vice president ticket. Now until this is verified please file it as rumor, however our sources on this are not bad.. and have yet to be proven wrong.

Our source noted “It will get a women on the ticket that shares the same views as Obama” a reference to many of the Hillary supporters..

Then of course we had to do some research.

We held some general opinions prior to this little research project. One of them being that they wouldn’t have multiple domain providers, it becomes a hassle.. so the chances are they used the same registrar.

The Main BARACK OBAMA site is using Godaddy as their registrar and uses DomainControl.com as their DNS… pretty generic.. as anyone can pretty much do that…

Now were it get’s interesting is the other contenders…

Domain Name: BARACKOBAMA.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: NS05.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS06.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

It appears OBAMASEBELIUS.COM is owned by the Obama Campaign, and the ‘hidden’ registration will turn into a website after the announcement. Our lead noted that a site is already being designed .. and advertising agencies are always full of leaks. Again file as rumor until verified…

We will compare the evidence we are allowed to show you without anyone getting fired.

So lets compare our suspect:

Domain Name: OBAMASEBELIUS.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: NS03.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS04.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

So far a perfect match for Kathleen Sebelius

But let’s research this more as there are other contenders out there that could have the exact same output. Let’s look at Joe Biden.

Domain Name: OBAMABIDEN.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: NS19.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS20.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

Sounds good so far.. until you see this:

Registrant:
LYLE DEAN
1571 CHURCH ST
SAN FRANCISCO, California 94131
United States

That’s a show stopper… because there is no way that Obama would allow this to happen with the domain name owned by someone else with unknown political views that could turn it into a porn site.

So let’s check Senator Evan Bayh, as a potential candidate.

Domain Name: OBAMABAYH.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: NS1.COFFEYDESIGN.COM
Name Server: NS2.COFFEYDESIGN.COM

Nameservers don’t match, and to make it worse.. the site goes to an RSS parser.. and nothing more.

So let’s try Tim Kaine

Domain Name: OBAMAKAINE.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: CPNS01.SECURESERVER.NET
Name Server: CPNS02.SECURESERVER.NET

Nameservers don’t match as well… however the registrar does.

This is possible, however unlikely. The chances are the same group that built BARACKOBAMA.COM will be building the new site. So the chances are that they are all going to be roughly identical.

This evidence isn’t conclusive with what is currently available, but the signs do point to Kathleen Sebelius.

Now coupled that with the lead we got.. and we feel there is well over a 50% chance that she will be Obama’s vice president.

Enjoy the speculation.
NiteOwl
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:38 PM) *
Keep convincing me; then when McCain beats Obama by one vote I'd like to see your response.


You like to glow in the dark ?

Personally I'd rather not.

Restarting the cold war with Russia is not wise... especially when it is far more likely to end in a nuclear offensive.

Marine
QUOTE(Arneoker @ Aug 19 2008, 12:40 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:37 PM) *
What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?

You really do wonder about that? What other things do you wonder about? Do you wonder if McCain thinks of himself as a Panamanian?

Well, I'd guess McCain would consider himself a military brat. Military brats never get to stay one place for a long time,. Sometimes a friend they had in the second grade will show back up in the ninth grade, sometimes you'll never see your best friend ever again.

My two kids got to live in three different Europeon countries, does that qualify them to be president or make them experts in foreign affairs?
Marine
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 12:48 PM) *
well arneoker- I was the one who was independent of the Edwards/Clark people in 2004...and I saw Edwards for what he was from day one
you on the other hand still defend him
by the way-I am not saying it won't be bayh- I am saying if it is, we are all dead emotinally and actually, because it will mean hillary won.

here's another article-

Barack Obama chooses Kathleen Sebelius for Vice President
August 18, 2008
We have a credible lead that Barack Obama will be announcing Kathleen Sebelius for Vice President / VP.
http://www.tribbleagency.com/?p=1747
Our sources work within an ad agency that is hired by the Obama campaign, and have noted that the vast majority of the discussions there are regarding material logistics in terms of Kathleen on the vice president ticket. Now until this is verified please file it as rumor, however our sources on this are not bad.. and have yet to be proven wrong.

Our source noted “It will get a women on the ticket that shares the same views as Obama” a reference to many of the Hillary supporters..

Then of course we had to do some research.

We held some general opinions prior to this little research project. One of them being that they wouldn’t have multiple domain providers, it becomes a hassle.. so the chances are they used the same registrar.

The Main BARACK OBAMA site is using Godaddy as their registrar and uses DomainControl.com as their DNS… pretty generic.. as anyone can pretty much do that…

Now were it get’s interesting is the other contenders…

Domain Name: BARACKOBAMA.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: NS05.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS06.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

It appears OBAMASEBELIUS.COM is owned by the Obama Campaign, and the ‘hidden’ registration will turn into a website after the announcement. Our lead noted that a site is already being designed .. and advertising agencies are always full of leaks. Again file as rumor until verified…

We will compare the evidence we are allowed to show you without anyone getting fired.

So lets compare our suspect:

Domain Name: OBAMASEBELIUS.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: NS03.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS04.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

So far a perfect match for Kathleen Sebelius

But let’s research this more as there are other contenders out there that could have the exact same output. Let’s look at Joe Biden.

Domain Name: OBAMABIDEN.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: NS19.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS20.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

Sounds good so far.. until you see this:

Registrant:
LYLE DEAN
1571 CHURCH ST
SAN FRANCISCO, California 94131
United States

That’s a show stopper… because there is no way that Obama would allow this to happen with the domain name owned by someone else with unknown political views that could turn it into a porn site.

So let’s check Senator Evan Bayh, as a potential candidate.

Domain Name: OBAMABAYH.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: NS1.COFFEYDESIGN.COM
Name Server: NS2.COFFEYDESIGN.COM

Nameservers don’t match, and to make it worse.. the site goes to an RSS parser.. and nothing more.

So let’s try Tim Kaine

Domain Name: OBAMAKAINE.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Name Server: CPNS01.SECURESERVER.NET
Name Server: CPNS02.SECURESERVER.NET

Nameservers don’t match as well… however the registrar does.

This is possible, however unlikely. The chances are the same group that built BARACKOBAMA.COM will be building the new site. So the chances are that they are all going to be roughly identical.

This evidence isn’t conclusive with what is currently available, but the signs do point to Kathleen Sebelius.

Now coupled that with the lead we got.. and we feel there is well over a 50% chance that she will be Obama’s vice president.

Enjoy the speculation.

http://www.tribbleagency.com/
Marine
QUOTE(NiteOwl @ Aug 19 2008, 12:49 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:38 PM) *
Keep convincing me; then when McCain beats Obama by one vote I'd like to see your response.


You like to glow in the dark ?

Personally I'd rather not.

Restarting the cold war with Russia is not wise... especially when it is far more likely to end in a nuclear offensive.

Most the triggers on the Russians bombs are currently dead due to lack of maintenance. The Russians know this, the Americans know this, almost everyone in the world knows this. Except you. But then you couldn't use scare tactics if you did.
tazvil04
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 11:37 AM) *
QUOTE(amy @ Aug 19 2008, 12:25 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 12:56 PM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 18 2008, 10:11 AM) *
Why would Barack choose someone to help on foreign policy and national security if these are the areas he is most comfortable with and the most daunting issues facing this nation are economic and a Sen. from DE does nothing to help shore up the midwest which Obama needs to win in Nov.?

If foreign policy and national security is Obama's forte' we are in deep do-do if he gts elected.


If you like GW's brand of foreign policy, you're right...Mccain's the man to vote for.

What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?


Marine:

He has a world view. I know this may be something foreign to you. However, growing up as a minority and being forced to live in different cultures it helps one to be able to observe and examine the point of view of other people and put yourself in their place. Our foreign policy the last four years has been guided by someone who sees the world in black and white terms. This may be how you see the world too. I cannot say. But George W. Bush entered office with a Cold War us vs. them mentality while we were on the cusp of a globalized economy in which distance was compressed. He used that world view to ignore the terrorist threats that were facing this nation, demonize oil nations that his cronies would like to have their hands on, and North Korea which he thought he could swagger into submission. His reckless approach where Bush and his advisors demonstrated a serious lack of perspective advancing with minimal international support has been seen by many as the reason for our lack of success in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Without international support, the US invasion was seen as prophetic since BIn Laden had said the US would try and occupy an oil rich state in the Middle East.

Respect is all that Iran is looking for. It is all North Korea wanted. It was all Saddam Hussein was trying to preserved after we disarmed him.

But Bush has not only not given these nations respect (though this recently changed with North Korea) but rather he has responded by demonizing them as "evil". This has not served to advance our interest and after the invasion of Iraq in 2003 it became clear to the North Koreans that regime change was the Bush MO and if NK wanted to keep its sovereignty it had better develope a nuclear weapon. And so it did.

Iran similarly has not been shown any respect. Granted they have been behaving badly, but some of this has to be traced to a couple of things. First, they helped us after 9/11 and were designated as part of an axis of evil. Second, such a designation has made regime change a possibility so developing a nuclear weapon as with North Korea is their way to defend themselves.

What Obama brings to this equation is perspective.

He knows what it is like to be on the outside looking in. He knows how to accord people and cultures respect. His worldview can be very helpful to US foreign policy. His openness would be extremely valuable to solving many solutions overseas. Evidence of this can be seen in Obama's endorsement of the Iraq Study Group report. The Bush Administration has rejected its calls to talk with enemies liek Syria and Iran. Israel ignored Bush requests not to talk with them because the Israelis are frustrated with the state of the region and they want peace. We need a foreign policy that is not afraid to engage enemies and if they are intransigent lets expose them for their being unreasomnable.

In particular, Bush's former counsellor Karen Hughes has stated on NPR and you continue to ignore that the best act that American people could do to change the perception of America in the world is elect Barack Obama. Now, this is a former chief advisor to Bush who said this. Polling shows that Arabs and others trust Obama. This is not a bad thing. Not all Arabs are enemies. Not all Iranians are enemies.

Stop being afraid of a person because he is different. One would think that your exposure in the military to different persons would not make you so afraid of difference.

Arneoker
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:50 PM) *
Well, I'd guess McCain would consider himself a military brat. Military brats never get to stay one place for a long time,. Sometimes a friend they had in the second grade will show back up in the ninth grade, sometimes you'll never see your best friend ever again.

My two kids got to live in three different Europeon countries, does that qualify them to be president or make them experts in foreign affairs?

Should I wonder what country your two kids feel a part of, since they have lived in four of them?
Arneoker
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 01:48 PM) *
well arneoker- I was the one who was independent of the Edwards/Clark people in 2004...and I saw Edwards for what he was from day one
you on the other hand still defend him

Well I grant that you judged Edwards' character better than I did. But that does not make your absurd theories about him any less absurd.

Everyone here has been right on something, sometimes.
tazvil04
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 11:59 AM) *
QUOTE(NiteOwl @ Aug 19 2008, 12:49 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:38 PM) *
Keep convincing me; then when McCain beats Obama by one vote I'd like to see your response.


You like to glow in the dark ?

Personally I'd rather not.

Restarting the cold war with Russia is not wise... especially when it is far more likely to end in a nuclear offensive.

Most the triggers on the Russians bombs are currently dead due to lack of maintenance. The Russians know this, the Americans know this, almost everyone in the world knows this. Except you. But then you couldn't use scare tactics if you did.


No one doubts that marine.

However, perhaps you haven't heard of the recent strategic missile success that Russia has had --- they recently tested successfully a missile desgined to penetrate through a missile defense system.

Imagine those going into mass development.

Russia's economy is on automatic pilot thanks to its energy reserves.

IT might not take them long to surpass us with strategic weapons if they put their mind to it.

Russian missile test adds to arms race fearsLuke Harding in Moscow The Guardian, Wednesday May 30 2007 Article history
Russia's new intercontinental ballistic missile takes off from Plesetsk launching pad. Photograph: Reuters

Russia yesterday threatened a new cold war-style arms race with the United States by announcing that it had successfully tested a new intercontinental ballistic missile capable of penetrating American defences.
Russia's hawkish first deputy prime minister, Sergei Ivanov, said the country had tested both a new multiple-warhead intercontinental missile, the RS-24, and an improved version of its short-range Iskander missile.

He said the missiles were capable of destroying enemy systems and added: "As of today Russia has new missiles that are capable of overcoming any existing or future missile defence systems. In terms of defence and security, Russia can look calmly to the country's future."

The missile tests follow months of anger in Moscow over the Bush administration's determination to install parts of a controversial missile defence shield in eastern Europe.

President Vladimir Putin has been incensed by the Pentagon's plans to site missile interceptors and radar shields in Poland and the Czech Republic. The row has contributed to the worst relations between Russia and the west for 20 years.

But as well as confrontational rhetoric from Mr Putin, Russia has also been preparing a secret military response, analysts said yesterday. They said the new RS-24 missile was capable of:

· carrying multiple independent warheads, making it almost impossible to shoot down

· travelling inter-continentally to hit targets thousands of miles away

· using sophisticated navigation systems which allow the warheads to lock on to different targets

Yesterday's launch took place at the Plesetsk cosmodrome in north-west Russia. The missile successfully hit its target 3,400 miles away in far eastern Kamchatka peninsula, on Russia's Pacific coast, the Russian strategic missile forces said.

The statement said the missile would replace two ageing ICBM systems - the RS-18 and RS-20, known in the west as the SS-19 Stiletto and SS-18 Satan, respectively. Separately, an upgraded and more accurate version of the Iskander-M cruise missile, was fired from southern Astrakhan.

Mr Ivanov, a potential successor to Mr Putin next year, hailed both tests as successful. He said Russia now had a "new tactical system and a new strategic system". He also signalled that Russia was preparing to upgrade its nuclear forces.

The treaty between the US and the Soviet Union banning intermediate range nuclear weapons was no longer effective, warned Mr Ivanov, Russia's former defence minister, because it did not apply to Russia's neighbours such as China.

Alexander Pikayev, an arms control expert and senior analyst at the Moscow-based Institute for World Economy and International Relations, said the development of the missile had probably been inevitable after the Bush administration unilaterally withdrew from the Soviet-era anti-ballistic missile treaty in 2002, preventing the Start-II treaty from coming into force. The treaty banned missiles with multiple warheads.

The test comes at a time of increased tension between Russia and the west over missiles and other weapons issues.

The Bush administration insists its new missile defence system is aimed at rogue missiles fired by Iran or North Korea. But Russia says the system destroys the strategic balance of forces in Europe and is a direct threat to the country's nuclear arsenal.

"We consider it harmful and dangerous to turn Europe into a powder keg," Mr Putin said yesterday when asked at a news conference with the Portuguese prime minister, Jose Socrates, about the test.

On Monday Russia called for an emergency conference in June on the key Soviet-era conventional forces in Europe treaty, which has been a source of increasing friction between Moscow and Nato.

The call follows last month's statement from Mr Putin in which he declared a moratorium on observing Russia's obligations under the treaty, which limits the number of aircraft, tanks and other non-nuclear heavy weapons around Europe. The treaty was first signed in 1990 and amended in 1999 to reflect changes since the Soviet breakup.

Russia has ratified the amended version, but the US and other Nato members have refused to do so until Moscow withdraws troops from the former Soviet republics of Moldova and Georgia - an issue Moscow says is unrelated.

Mr Putin warned that Russia could dump the treaty altogether if western nations refused to ratify its amended version, and the foreign ministry said on Monday that it had lodged a formal request for a conference among treaty signatories in Vienna, Austria, on June 12-15.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/may/30/usa.topstories3
amy
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:50 PM) *
QUOTE(Arneoker @ Aug 19 2008, 12:40 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:37 PM) *
What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?

You really do wonder about that? What other things do you wonder about? Do you wonder if McCain thinks of himself as a Panamanian?

Well, I'd guess McCain would consider himself a military brat. Military brats never get to stay one place for a long time,. Sometimes a friend they had in the second grade will show back up in the ninth grade, sometimes you'll never see your best friend ever again.

My two kids got to live in three different Europeon countries, does that qualify them to be president or make them experts in foreign affairs?


No, living in foreign nations doesn't qualify one to be POTUS. But according to your logic, if your girls were qualified to be president they won't be really qualified because they lived in foreign countries. blink.gif
Arneoker
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:59 PM) *
Most the triggers on the Russians bombs are currently dead due to lack of maintenance. The Russians know this, the Americans know this, almost everyone in the world knows this. Except you. But then you couldn't use scare tactics if you did.

So there is something wrong with using scare tactics?

I guess my wife being forced to wear a burka would be a good thing then!
tazvil04
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 11:50 AM) *
QUOTE(Arneoker @ Aug 19 2008, 12:40 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:37 PM) *
What experience has Obama got? Living in Indonesia when he was 10 years old? Parnohadiningrat Sudjadnan, the Indonesian ambassador to the U.S said, "Back home people think of him as one of us". I wonder what Obama thinks?

You really do wonder about that? What other things do you wonder about? Do you wonder if McCain thinks of himself as a Panamanian?

Well, I'd guess McCain would consider himself a military brat. Military brats never get to stay one place for a long time,. Sometimes a friend they had in the second grade will show back up in the ninth grade, sometimes you'll never see your best friend ever again.

My two kids got to live in three different Europeon countries, does that qualify them to be president or make them experts in foreign affairs?


If they similarly devleoped their resume like Barack Obama has I should think so...

-community leader with and emphasis in health care and economic development
-civil rights lawyer
-3 term Staet Senator
-first term US Senate
-acclaimed author
-first time national campaign leader who won nomination against one of the top poltical families in the US.

Experience abroad cannot be underestimated in my opinion.

Oftentimes we act with apparent blinders on and without a broad understanding of how we are perceived and whether our conduct is the best action for a particular situation.

One would think that your children's experience would make that more apparent to you...
graham4anything
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Aug 19 2008, 10:37 AM) *
Evan Bayh: No Memory of Neocon Iraq Liberation Committee





I have not heard directly from Senator Evan Bayh's office about the issue of his having co-chaired with John McCain and Joseph Lieberman the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq.

But I just ran across this admission by Senator Bayh that he has no recollection of the neoconservative operation to which his name was attached. He does admit that it was attached though -- just not sure how it got there.

From the Wall Street Journal:

Sen. Bayh now says he regrets his early support of the Iraq war and has no recollection of the committee. "I don't remember any meetings, any conversations, any anything," Sen. Bayh said in a telephone interview Tuesday. "Obviously my name was linked to it, but other than that there's nothing that can be said."
Senators are busy -- and they get signed up for all sorts of stuff by staffers who operate in their bosses' names. That's just the way the system works.

But this is the first time I've seen a US Senator who has probably done many things by name that he has no direct recollection of disown an act by declaring ignorance of it.

I take Senator Bayh at his word that he may not recall this high profile committee that garnered lots of press attention and had McCain, Lieberman, Scheunemann, James Woolsey and others attached.

But then I think that the Senator owes us an explanation of how his staff signed him up for this -- or how it happened. He should do an investigation of the action done in his name and then share the results publicly.

The "I don't remember this" explanation doesn't quite get over the big hump of how he could unknowingly become a co-helmsman of one of the most controversial NGOs tied to the clamor to invade Iraq.

-- Steve Clemons



whenever one of the sockpuppets starts to move the thread, I go back and read the thread

It was this post that brought marine onto the board hijacking the thread into something it wasn't

So this post has important info in it against Bayh, and as such, it is trying to be diverted

in my opinion
NiteOwl
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:59 PM) *
QUOTE(NiteOwl @ Aug 19 2008, 12:49 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:38 PM) *
Keep convincing me; then when McCain beats Obama by one vote I'd like to see your response.


You like to glow in the dark ?

Personally I'd rather not.

Restarting the cold war with Russia is not wise... especially when it is far more likely to end in a nuclear offensive.

Most the triggers on the Russians bombs are currently dead due to lack of maintenance. The Russians know this, the Americans know this, almost everyone in the world knows this. Except you. But then you couldn't use scare tactics if you did.



So you expect us to base our safety on the inability of the Russian Government / military to mount an offensive because their missiles are all duds ?

You may want to base your defense on their limited capabilities... I, and I would think most, don't.

Somehow, when push comes to shove if they are threatened, I'd bet that they come up with a solution...

Besides... it's not a scare tactic. Russia is in a much stronger position to wage war than we are at the overstretched moment.

tazvil04
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 11:43 AM) *
QUOTE(tazvil04 @ Aug 19 2008, 01:41 PM) *
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 11:30 AM) *
Howard Finneman thinks its Biden (he has talked to the finalists)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26288748
Biden the clear frontrunner for Veep

By Howard Fineman
MSNBC
updated 2 hours, 19 minutes ago


Howard Fineman



ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - Within the last few hours I've spoken with two of the finalists for the role of Barack Obama's running-mate, and to two other sources who are close to the process.

My bottom line is this: Barring a big surprise or last-minute change of heart, the choice is likely to be Sen. Joe Biden of Deleware, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

He is a lively and feisty if unpredictable campaigner with working-class roots and a street-level feel for the hot spots of the globe — which he can use to go toe-to-toe with Sen. John McCain.

"If I had to bet my life on it, I'd bet it is Joe," said one of the other contenders.

Said another, "Barack is moving toward a seasoned Beltway type, and that probably means Biden."


Now I know its Bayh.

He's talked to the finalists -- so because Biden gives the strongest denial he's the choice? Rofl2.gif



and you thought Dick Gephardt was the vp in 2004


Dick Gephart?

I urged Wes Clark.

I thought it might be Edwards, though.

I do not know where you get Gephart...
Marine
QUOTE(NiteOwl @ Aug 19 2008, 01:11 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:59 PM) *
QUOTE(NiteOwl @ Aug 19 2008, 12:49 PM) *
QUOTE(Marine @ Aug 19 2008, 01:38 PM) *
Keep convincing me; then when McCain beats Obama by one vote I'd like to see your response.


You like to glow in the dark ?

Personally I'd rather not.

Restarting the cold war with Russia is not wise... especially when it is far more likely to end in a nuclear offensive.

Most the triggers on the Russians bombs are currently dead due to lack of maintenance. The Russians know this, the Americans know this, almost everyone in the world knows this. Except you. But then you couldn't use scare tactics if you did.



So you expect us to base our safety on the inability of the Russian Government / military to mount an offensive because their missiles are all duds ?

You may want to base your defense on their limited capabilities... I, and I would think most, don't.

Somehow, when push comes to shove if they are threatened, I'd bet that they come up with a solution...

Besides... it's not a scare tactic. Russia is in a much stronger position to wage war than we are at the overstretched moment.

If it was necessary the United States military could still make hash out of Russia's armed services even in our "overstretched" position. Believe it or not, the Russians know this.
Arneoker
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 02:10 PM) *
whenever one of the sockpuppets starts to move the thread, I go back and read the thread

It was this post that brought marine onto the board hijacking the thread into something it wasn't

So this post has important info in it against Bayh, and as such, it is trying to be diverted

in my opinion

In my son's opinion John McCain came to our house to take $1 million from him.

But seriously, the worst thing anyone could to kill off this dud of an argument against Bayh would be to repeat it.
Arneoker
QUOTE(graham4anything @ Aug 19 2008, 02:10 PM) *
QUOTE(Snuffysmith @ Aug 19 2008, 10:37 AM) *
Evan Bayh: No Memory of Neocon Iraq Liberation Committee





I have not heard directly from Senator Evan Bayh's office about the issue of his having co-chaired with John McCain and Joseph Lieberman the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq.

But I just ran across this admission by Senator Bayh that he has no recollection of the neoconservative operation to which his name was attached. He does admit that it was attached though -- just not sure how it got there.

From the Wall Street Journal:

Sen. Bayh now says he regrets his early support of the Iraq war and has no recollection of the committee. "I don't remember any meetings, any conversations, any anything," Sen. Bayh said in a telephone interview Tuesday. "Obviously my name was linked to it, but other than that there's nothing that can be said."
Senators are busy -- and they get signed up for all sorts of stuff by staffers who operate in their bosses' names. That's just the way the system works.

But this is the first time I've seen a US Senator who has probably done many things by name that he has no direct recollection of disown an act by declaring ignorance of it.

I take Senator Bayh at his word that he may not recall this high profile committee that garnered lots of press attention and had McCain, Lieberman, Scheunemann, James Woolsey and others attached.

But then I think that the Senator owes us an explanation of how his staff signed him up for this -- or how it happened. He should do an investigation of the action done in his name and then share the results publicly.

The "I don't remember this" explanation doesn't quite get over the big hump of how he could unknowingly become a co-helmsman of one of the most controversial NGOs tied to the clamor to invade Iraq.

-- Steve Clemons



whenever one of the sockpuppets starts to move the thread, I go back and read the thread

It was this post that brought marine onto the board hijacking the thread into something it wasn't

So this post has important info in it against Bayh, and as such, it is trying to be diverted

in my opinion

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.